Introduction to Nonabelian Hodge Theory Flat connections, Higgs bundles and complex variations of Hodge structure
Alberto Garc´ıa-Raboso and Steven Rayan
The correspondence between Higgs bundles and local systems can be viewed as a Hodge theorem for non-abelian cohomology.
— Carlos T. Simpson [67]
1 Introduction ...... 1 2 Zoology of connections ...... 5 2.1 Differentials ...... 5 2.2 Connections ...... 7 3 The correspondence between Higgs bundles and local systems ...... 13 4 A sketch of proof ...... 14 4.1 Hermitian metrics ...... 15 4.2 Harmonic bundles ...... 17 4.3 From flat bundles to harmonic bundles ...... 20 4.4 From Higgs bundles to harmonic bundles ...... 21 4.5 Extensions ...... 22 5 The hyperk¨ahlermanifold ...... 23 6 Properties of the moduli space of Higgs bundles on a curve ...... 24 6.1 The first example: the cotangent bundle of a Jacobian ...... 25 6.2 The Hitchin map, spectral curves, and other features of X (r, d) . . 26 M 7 The circle action and complex variations of Hodge structure ...... 30 8 Example calculations ...... 34 8.1 y(1, d) ...... 34 P 8.2 y(2, 1) ...... 34 P 8.3 Degree independence of Betti numbers ...... 37 References ...... 37
1 Introduction arXiv:1406.1693v4 [math.CV] 19 Dec 2014
Hodge theory bridges the topological, smooth and holomorphic worlds. In the abelian case, these are embodied by the Betti, de Rham and Dolbeault
Alberto Garc´ıa-Raboso, e-mail: [email protected] Steven Rayan, e-mail: [email protected]
1 2 Alberto Garc´ıa-Raboso and Steven Rayan
cohomology groups, respectively, of a smooth compact K¨ahlermanifold, X. The standard isomorphisms
1 HB(X, C) ∼= Hom(H1(X, Z), C) ∼= Hom(π1X, C) then assert that we are, in particular, looking at representations of the fundamental group of X in the additive group of the complex numbers. Therefore, it is only natural to ask which smooth and holomorphic objects realize representations of π1X in other, possibly nonabelian, groups. In the first case, a complete answer is given by the Riemann-Hilbert correspondence: representations of π1X in the general linear group GLr(C) (up to conjugacy) are equivalent to C∞ vector bundles on X equipped with a flat connection. The first results making a connection with the holomorphic world appeared in the works of Narasimhan and Seshadri [57, 63] in the 1960s: they discovered that unitary representations of the fundamental group of a compact Riemann surface yield stable1 holomorphic vector bundles. Their correspondence was extended to higher-dimensional compact K¨ahlermanifolds by Donaldson [19, 20], Mehta and Ramanathan [51], and Uhlenbeck and Yau [72]. A seminal paper of Hitchin’s, [35], introduced the notion of a Higgs field, the data of which incorporates the non-unitary part of a GLr(C)-representation. A flurry of activity —Donaldson [21], Diederich and Ohsawa [14], Beilinson and Deligne (unpublished), Corlette [13], Jost and Yau [41, 42], Simpson [64]— culminated in Simpson’s correspondence [67] between GLr(C)-representations of π1X and holomorphic vector bundles on X equipped with a Higgs field. It is this nonabelian Hodge theorem that the first part of these notes concentrates on. After describing the main actors in 2, we will state it in 3 and give an outline of its proof (closely following [67§]) in 4. In Figure 1 we§ have represented all of the objects that will appear in 2– 4§ with an emphasis on the world in which each one of them lives, and how§ § they are described (what we call contexts; cf. 2.1). We hope it will help the reader succesfully navigate these sections. § Although we have tried to make our discussion here as self-contained as possible, those wishing for extended expositions on these and other related concepts can refer to the textbooks [45], [40] and [73]. In the second part ( 5– 8), we move to the level of moduli spaces: those of Higgs bundles, flat connections,§ § and representations of the fundamental group. Simpson calls these the Dolbeault, de Rham, and Betti moduli spaces, respectively [68]. We focus in particular on the moduli space of Higgs bundles on a curve, because another aspect of Hodge theory —complex variations of Hodge structure— arises naturally from the C×-action on this space. (In this survey, we concentrate on the case of ordinary Higgs bundles; for more general Hitchin systems, in which the Higgs field is permitted to take values in an arbitrary line bundle, see [61, 10, 49]. The genus zero case is treated in, e.g.,
1 The appropriate stability condition in this setting is slope stability; for holomorphic vector bundles, this is the same as Definition 6 with φ = 0. Introduction to Nonabelian Hodge Theory 3
[3, 1].) In section 7, we explain how the C×-action enables one to calculate Betti numbers of§ the moduli space of Higgs bundles. As a consequence of the nonabelian Hodge theorem, these Betti numbers are also those of the de Rham and Betti spaces. For a concrete example of the role that complex variations of Hodge structure play in the topology of Higgs bundle moduli spaces, we give in 8 an outline of Hitchin’s calculation of the Betti numbers for the space of rank§ 2 Higgs bundles. Historically, after Hitchin’s calculation in [35], the Betti numbers for rank 3 were computed by Gothen [26, 27] and the Betti numbers for rank 4 were calculated by Garc´ıa-Prada,Heinloth, and Schmitt [24]. All of these calculations stem from Hitchin’s Morse-theoretic localization technique [35], although the rank 4 calculation is motivic in nature. Computing the Betti numbers of these noncompact spaces is a difficult problem, even with the C×-action. There are conjectural Betti numbers for Higgs bundle moduli spaces of all ranks, derived arithmetically by Hausel and Rodriguez-Villegas [31], and using physical arguments by Chuang, Diaconescu, and Pan [12], demonstrating the diversity of tools employed in the study of Higgs bundles. In these notes, we are admittedly only skimming a bit of cream from the top of a rich theory. Dig deeper and you will find:
the nonabelian Hodge correspondence for groups other than GLr [67]; • the nonabelian Hodge correspondence over quasiprojective varieties, in its • tame [52, 65, 5, 43, 53, 54] and wild [6, 7, 55, 74] variants; moduli spaces of parabolic Higgs bundles, e.g., [46, 58, 8, 56, 23, 48]; • connections to generalized complex geometry, e.g., [38]; • the central role of Higgs bundles in the geometric Langlands conjecture, • e.g., [17, 22]; the pivotal part played by Higgs bundles in Ngˆo’sproof of the fundamental • lemma [60]. Of course, any errors, omissions, or misrepresentations in this survey are our fault alone. Acknowledgements. We thank Chuck Doran, David Morrison, Radu Laza, and Johannes Walcher for organizing the Workshop on Hodge Theory in String Theory, as well as Alan Thompson for arranging the concentrated graduate course in which we gave these lectures. We are indebted to Noriko Yui for encouraging us to contribute these notes, and for organizing a vibrant and productive thematic program at the Fields Institute. These notes benefited from useful comments and suggestions by Philip Boalch, Tam´asHausel, Tony Pantev, and an anonymous referee. We also thank Marco Gualtieri and Lisa Jeffrey for their support and for providing a stimulating working environment in Toronto. 4 Alberto Garc´ıa-Raboso and Steven Rayan ) ) 0 X X A O X, 4.4) X, § context: ) = ( theorem ∞ ) = ( O description) C , 2.2, Example 5) O § , X ∞ metrics ( ( Koszul-Malgrange ( X C ( Hermitian–Yang–Mills = 0 Holomorphic context: λ 2.2, Example 9) 2.2, Example 10) § Higgs bundles § ( ( The holomorphic world Higgs bundles ( 3) § -connection 4.2) h § ( d theorem ( - 4.2, Proposition 3) λ Nonabelian Hodge § ( Vector bundles Harmonic bundles + flat = 1 λ 4.3) § 2.2, Example 4) 2.2, Example 7) The smooth world Flat bundles § § ( ( Harmonic metrics ( theorem Flat holomorphic bundles 2.2, Example 5) § ( Koszul-Malgrange 2.2, Example 4) § ( X correspondence Riemann-Hilbert 1 π of Topological context Local systems Representations The topological world
Fig. 1 The objects in nonabelian Hodge theory and their relationships. Introduction to Nonabelian Hodge Theory 5 2 Zoology of connections
Both the statement and the inner workings of the nonabelian Hodge corre- spondence revolve around a collection of operators that are generically known as connections. In order to accommodate all the cases we will have need for, we offer some general definitions and statements immediately followed by a detailed discussion of those cases.
2.1 Differentials
Let X be a topological space, a sheaf of commutative C-algebras on X making the pair (X, ) into a locally-ringedO space, and a locally-free sheaf of coherent -modulesO on X2. K O Definition 1. A differential on the pair ( , ) is a degree 1, C-linear deriva- V O K tion of the exterior algebra • that squares to zero. O K In concrete terms, a differential consists of a collection of C-linear maps
D(k) : Vk Vk+1 , k 0 OK → O K ≥ satisfying the graded Leibniz rule
D(k1+k2)(ω ω ) = D(k1)(ω ) ω + ( 1)k1 ω D(k2)ω 1 ∧ 2 1 ∧ 2 − 1 ∧ 2 Vk1 Vk2 (k+1) (k) for ω1 and ω2 , and such that D D = 0. We will follow the∈ commonO K practice∈ O ofK omitting the superscript◦ from the notation, denoting simply by D all of the above maps —which leaves us with the tantalising equation D2 = 0. Observe that this data turns
0 D D V2 D −→ O −−→K −−→ OK −−→· · · into a cochain complex of sheaves of C-vector spaces. In fact, the compat- ibility with products expressed by the graded Leibniz rule makes the pair V • ,D into a cdga (=commutative differential graded algebra) object in O K the category of sheaves of C-vector spaces on X, and its hypercohomology, k V H X, • ,D , into a graded commutative C-algebra. O K
2 The reader unfamiliar with the language of locally-ringed spaces should think of the pair (X, ) as selecting a geometric context —the examples below should make this clear. O “A locally-free sheaf of coherent -modules on X” is then just a way of saying “a vector O bundle of finite rank” in that context. 6 Alberto Garc´ıa-Raboso and Steven Rayan
Examples
0 Example 1. Let X = X be a compact K¨ahlermanifold, = X the sheaf of 1 O A smooth complex-valued functions on it, and = X the sheaf of smooth complex-valued 1-forms on X. The exterior derivativeK A of smooth complex- valued differential forms,
d : k k+1, k 0, (1) AX → AX ≥ is then a differential on the pair ( 0 , 1 ). The associated complex, AX AX 0 0 d 1 d 2 d , (2) −→ AX −→AX −→AX −→· · · is known as the de Rham complex of X, for it computes the de Rham coho- mology of X:
k k k H (X) = H Γ (X, • ), d = H X, ( • , d) . (3) dR AX ∼ AX Example 2. Recall that, on a complex manifold, we can separate smooth complex-valued k-forms into their (p, q) components: M k = p,q. AX ∼ AX p+q=k
The image under the de Rham differential (cf. Example 1) of a k-form ω of type (p, q) splits as the sum of two terms,
dω = ∂ω + ∂ω, where ∂ω and ∂ω are (k +1)-forms of type (p+1, q) and (p, q +1), respectively. These so-called Dolbeault operators, ∂ and ∂, restrict to differentials on the 0 1,0 0 0,1 pairs ( X , X ) and ( X , X ), respectively. The cochain complex associated to theA secondA of theseA is calledA the Dolbeault complex of X,
0 0 ∂ 0,1 ∂ 0,2 ∂ , −→ AX −−→AX −−→AX −−→· · · and it gives rise to some of the Dolbeault cohomology groups of X:
0,k k 0, k 0, H (X) = H Γ (X, •), ∂ = H X, ( •, ∂) . ∂ AX ∼ AX The Dolbeault cohomology groups Hp,q(X) for p = 0 will appear later on in ∂ our discussion. 6
0 0,1 Example 3. Let = X = ker ∂ : X X be the sheaf of holomorphic O O 0 { A → A } 1,0 functions on X. The X -module structure on X naturally restricts to A 1 A 1,0 1,1 an X -module structure on the sheaf = ΩX = ker ∂ : X X of holomorphicO 1-forms on X. The holomorphicK de Rham{ differentialA →, A } Introduction to Nonabelian Hodge Theory 7
d : Ωk Ωk+1, k 0, h X → X ≥ induced by the de Rham differential on smooth complex-valued differential 1 forms, then becomes a differential on the pair ( X ,ΩX ). The associated complex, O d d d 0 h Ω1 h Ω2 h , −→ OX −−→ X −−→ X −−→· · · receives the name of holomorphic de Rham complex of X, and it turns out to also compute the de Rham cohomology of X.
2.2 Connections
Definition 2. Let D be a differential on ( , ), a locally-free sheaf of O K V coherent -modules on X, and λ C.A λ-D-connection on is a C-linear map, : O , satisfying∈ the λ-twisted Leibniz rule, V ∇ V → V ⊗O K (fv) = λv Df + f v, for f , v . ∇ ⊗ ∇ ∈ O ∈ V Curvature
There is a canonical extension of such an operator to a collection of C-linear maps, (k) : Vk Vk+1 , k 0, (4) ∇ V ⊗O OK → V ⊗O O K ≥ defined through the λ-twisted Leibniz rule
(k)(v ω) = λv Dω + (v) ω, for ω Vk , v . ∇ ⊗ ⊗ ∇ ∧ ∈ OK ∈ V It is an easy exercise to check that the compositions (k+1) (k) are linear over Vk , in the sense that ∇ ◦ ∇ O K (k+1) (k) (v ω) = (1) (0) (v) ω, for v V, ω Vk . ∇ ◦ ∇ ⊗ ∇ ◦ ∇ ∧ ∈ ∈ O In particular, (1) (0) is -linear and can be considered as a global section of the sheaf of∇ endomorphisms◦ ∇ O of with values in V2 through the standard duality isomorphism V O K Hom , V2 = Hom , End ( ) V2 O V V ⊗O OK ∼ O O O V ⊗O OK = Γ X, End ( ) V2 . ∼ O V ⊗O OK Definition 3. The curvature of a λ-D-connection, , on is ∇ V (1) (0) Γ X, End ( ) V2 . ∇ ◦ ∇ ∈ O V ⊗O OK 8 Alberto Garc´ıa-Raboso and Steven Rayan
We say that is flat (or integrable) if its curvature vanishes. ∇ Once again, we drop the superscripts and simply denote by all of the operators (4), so that flatness is the requirement 2 = 0. ∇ ∇ Cohomology
A pair ( , ) as above where is flat carries with it an intrinsic notion of cohomology:V ∇ namely, the hypercohomology∇ of the complex of sheaves of C-vector spaces
2 0 ∇ ∇ V ∇ . (5) −→ V −−→V ⊗O K −−→V ⊗O OK −−→· · · V The latter is a dg-module over the cdga • ,D , and hence its hyperco- O K V homology, H•(X, ( , )), comes equipped with a H• X, • ,D -module structure. V ∇ O K In the remainder, we will need not only these hypercohomology groups, but also the complex of C-vector spaces that computes them: the complex of derived global sections of (5), denoted by RΓ (X, ( , )). If the sheaves V V ∇ • are acyclic, this is simply the complex of global sections of (5), V ⊗O O K V RΓ ( , ) = Γ (X, • ), . V ∇ V ⊗O O K ∇ Otherwise3, it is the complex RΓ ( , ) = Γ (X, •), e V ∇ I ∇ V of global sections of any acyclic resolution, ( • , ) ( •, e ), of (5). V ⊗O OK ∇ → I ∇ Tensor products and duals
Definition 4. Given two locally-free sheaves of coherent -modules equipped with λ-D-connections, ( , ) and ( , ), their tensorO product is given by V1 ∇1 V2 ∇2
( 1, 1) ( 2, 2) = ( 1 2, 1 1 + 1 2). V ∇ ⊗ V ∇ V ⊗O V ∇ ⊗ ⊗ ∇
Curvature is additive under this operation, and so 1 1 + 1 2 is a flat λ-D-connection if so are and . ∇ ⊗ ⊗ ∇ ∇1 ∇2 Definition 5. Let ( , ) be a locally-free sheaf of coherent -modules V ∇ O equipped with a λ-D-connection. We define its dual,( , )∗, as the pair V ∇ ( ∗, ∗), where the λ-D-connection ∗ is defined by the equation V ∇ ∇
∗(η)(v) + η( v) = λD(ηv), for η ∗, v . ∇ ∇ ∈ V ∈ V 3 In the smooth setting, all of our sheaves are fine, hence acyclic, and this extra complication does not show up; some care must be exercised in the holomorphic category though. Introduction to Nonabelian Hodge Theory 9
It is a good exercise to check that ∗ satisfies the appropriate Leibniz rule, and that it is flat if is. ∇ ∇ Categories of λ-D-connections
For any fixed value of λ, there is an obvious notion of morphism between locally-free sheaves of coherent -modules equipped with a λ-D-connection; O namely, a morphism from ( 1, 1) to ( 2, 2) is a morphism of sheaves of -modules, f : , thatV commutes∇ V with∇ the connections: O V1 → V2
1 1 ∇ 1 V V ⊗O K f f id ⊗ K 2 2 ∇ 2 V V ⊗O K We will refer to the category determined by these arrows as the category of λ-D-connections. In terms of the duals and tensor products, the above definition of morphisms is equivalent to setting
Hom ( , ), ( , ) V1 ∇1 V2 ∇2 ∗ 1+1 2 ∇1 ⊗ ⊗∇ = ker Γ (X, 1∗ 2) Γ ( 1∗ 2 ) . V ⊗O V −−−−−−−−−−→ V ⊗O V ⊗O K
If we restrict our attention to the full subcategory of flat λ-D-connections, these morphism sets have the following nice description in terms of the intrinsic cohomologies defined above: