DOCSLIB.ORG

2019 Oklahoma Agriculture Statistics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2019 Oklahoma Agriculture Statistics Published October 2019 Contains 2017 revised and 2018 preliminary data Cover photo courtesy of Oklahoma Department of Agriculture, Food and Forestry and Braden Schovanec Graphic design of cover created by Morgan Vance, Public Information Officer, Oklahoma Department of Agriculture, Food and Forestry This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture under Agreement No. 58- 3AEU-5-0010. This publication, printed by the Central Printing Division, Office of Management and Enterprises Services, is compiled by the Division of Agricultural Statistics as authorized by the Oklahoma Board of Agriculture. One thousand copies have been printed and distributed at a cost of $5,130. Copies have been deposited with the Publications Clearinghouse of the Oklahoma Department of Libraries. OKLAHOMA AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS 2019 Issued Cooperatively By National Oklahoma Agricultural Department of Statistics Agriculture, Service Food and Forestry Hubert Hamer, Administrator Blayne Arthur, Commissioner Kevin Barnes, Associate Administrator Members of the Oklahoma State Board of Agriculture: Blayne Arthur, Secretary and Commissioner of Agriculture Ed Hurliman - Broken Bow Jay Franklin – Vinita Joe Farris – Taloga Karen Krehbiel Dodson - Hydro Prepared by USDA-NASS, Southern Plains Regional Field Office P.O. Box 70 Austin, Texas 78767 512-501-3200 ~ 800-626-3142 e-mail: [email protected] USDA-NASS, Oklahoma Field Office P.O. Box 528804 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73152 405-415-8850 ~ 888-525-9226 e-mail: [email protected] Field Office Staff: Troy Marshall, State Statistician Carla Whitt, State Survey Coordinator This report is also available on the Internet at www.nass.usda.gov/ok State of Oklahoma Department of Agriculture, Food, and Forestry J. Kevin Stitt Blayne Arthur Governor Secretary of Agriculture Oklahoma Agriculturists — It is a pleasure to present to you the 2019 edition of the Oklahoma Agriculture Statistics Bulletin. 2019 has been a difficult year to be involved in agriculture. However, even with many challenges, there is no doubt we are blessed to live in a state with an impressive agricultural footprint and an impact extending far beyond our state lines. In light of the recent hardships faced due to flood waters, it is humbling to see data proving our producers endure and overcome record-breaking storms and natural disasters. I commend and extend the most sincere thank you to each of them for their unwavering grit and strong resilience when it comes to providing for our state. I am so proud of the partnership and the work done by the United States Department of Agriculture’s National Agriculture Statistics Services. This partnership allows us to collect data and information that ultimately assists our producers and policy makers make decisions that impact all of the agriculture industry. Thank you to the USDA-NASS state staff for not only their hard work put into this bulletin, but the efforts they put in year-round. At the department, we work with producers and consumers to ensure the continual value and productivity of the agricultural industry. I hope these statistics fill you with pride for Oklahoma agriculture and inspires you to support our hardworking producers. Sincerely, Blayne Arthur Oklahoma Secretary of Agriculture 2800 N. Lincoln, Oklahoma City, OK 73105 • (405) 521-3864 United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service Oklahoma Field Office Cooperating with the Oklahoma Department of Agriculture, Food and Forestry P.O. Box 528804 · Oklahoma City, OK 73152-8804 (405) 415-8850 · FAX (405) 528-2296 · www.nass.usda.gov/ok Agriculture Producers and Data Users: Welcome to the 2019 edition of Oklahoma Agricultural Statistics. This publication, which is also available on our web site, is published annually as a reliable source of state agricultural production, prices, farm income, and various other agriculture data since the 1950’s. This publication would not be possible without the cooperation of all the Oklahoma farmers, ranchers, agribusinesses, and commodity groups across our great state. Their cooperation is what ensures the agricultural industry has timely and accurate data show their importance to the State of Oklahoma. Thank you to all those who participated or encourage response to our surveys. I would like to also recognize our team of NASDA enumerators across the state, as well as in our Data Collection Center, and the staff of the Southern Plains Regional Field Office. Their consistent commitment to data quality allows us to continually provide Oklahoma with highest quality of agriculture statistics. It is also important to recognize the Oklahoma State Board of Agriculture and Oklahoma Department of Agriculture, Food and Forestry for providing the necessary resources to help make this bulletin possible. In April, NASS released the 2017 Census of Agriculture publication. This comprehensive publication provides the Agricultural Industry with the necessary data to make informed decision about the future of Oklahoma Agriculture. Thanks to all sister agencies/commodity groups who disseminated the results. To learn more about the results for Oklahoma visit our publication at on our website at www.nass.usda.gov/ok. For your questions, comments, and informational requests, please feel free to contact my office. Regards, Troy Marshall State Statistician TABLE OF CONTENTS Secretary’s Remarks ....................................................................................................................................... ii State Statistician Remarks .............................................................................................................................. iii State Agriculture Overview Crop Production Summary – Oklahoma: 2018 .......................................................................................... 4 Select Commodities, State Ranking and Value of Production – Oklahoma: 2015-2018 ............................ 4 Farms and Land in Farms, by Sales Class – Oklahoma and United States: 2014-2018 ............................ 5 Select Commodities, U.S. Ranking and State Production – Oklahoma: 2018 ........................................... 6 Record Highs and Lows, Selected Commodities – Oklahoma: 1867-2018 ................................................ 7 Consumption of Commercial Fertilizers – Oklahoma and United States: 2015-2017 ................................. 8 Crop Weather 2018 Crop Weather Review ...................................................................................................................... 9 Average Temperature by Month – Oklahoma: 2018 and Historic ............................................................ 11 Average Precipitation by Month – Oklahoma: 2018 and Historic ............................................................. 12 Crops General 2018 Crop Production Review ........................................................................................................... 13 2018 Crop Calendar .......................................................................................................................... 14 Marketing Percentages by Month, Select Crops – Oklahoma: Marketing Year 2014-2018 ................ 14 Crop Acreage, Yield, Production, and Value – Oklahoma: 2014-2018 and Historic ........................... 15 Silage Acreage, Yield, and Production – Oklahoma: 2014-2018 and Historic .................................... 18 Corn Corn for Grain Acreage, Yield, and Production, by County – Oklahoma: 2017-2018 ......................... 18 Cotton Upland Cotton Acreage, Yield, and Production, by County – Oklahoma: 2017-2018 ......................... 20 Hay Hay Acreage, Yield, Production, and Value – Oklahoma: 2014-2018 and Historic ............................ 21 Hay Prices Received by Month – Oklahoma: Marketing Year 2014-2018 and Historic ...................... 22 Alfalfa Hay Acreage, Yield, and Production, by County – Oklahoma: 2017-2018 .............................. 23 Other Hay Acreage, Yield, and Production, by County – Oklahoma: 2017-2018 ............................... 24 Peanuts Peanut Acreage, Yield, and Production, by County – Oklahoma: 2017-2018 .................................... 26 Sorghum Sorghum Acreage, Yield, and Production, by County – Oklahoma: 2017-2018 ................................. 27 Sorghum for Grain Prices Received by Month – Oklahoma: Marketing Year 2014-2018 and Historic ....................................................................................................................................... 28 Soybeans Soybean Acreage, Yield, and Production, by County – Oklahoma: 2017-2018 ................................. 29 Oklahoma Agricultural Statistics (2019) Table of Contents - 2 Wheat Winter Wheat Acreage, Yield, and Production, by County – Oklahoma: 2017-2018 .......................... 31 Winter Wheat Prices Received by Month – Oklahoma: Marketing Year 2014-2018 and Historic ....................................................................................................................................... 33 Wheat Varieties, Percent of Seeded Acres – Oklahoma: 2015-2019 ................................................. 33 Wheat Varieties by District – Oklahoma: Crop Year 2019 ................................................................. 34 Grain Stocks Grain Stocks – Oklahoma: 2014-2018 ............................................................................................... 36 Grain Storage Facilities and Capacity – Oklahoma:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Livestock and Landscapes
    SUSTAINABILITY PATHWAYS LIVESTOCK AND LANDSCAPES SHARE OF LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION IN GLOBAL LAND SURFACE DID YOU KNOW? Agricultural land used for ENVIRONMENT Twenty-six percent of the Planet’s ice-free land is used for livestock grazing LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION and 33 percent of croplands are used for livestock feed production. Livestock contribute to seven percent of the total greenhouse gas emissions through enteric fermentation and manure. In developed countries, 90 percent of cattle Agricutural land used for belong to six breed and 20 percent of livestock breeds are at risk of extinction. OTHER AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION SOCIAL One billion poor people, mostly pastoralists in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, depend on livestock for food and livelihoods. Globally, livestock provides 25 percent of protein intake and 15 percent of dietary energy. ECONOMY Livestock contributes up to 40 percent of agricultural gross domestic product across a significant portion of South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa but receives just three percent of global agricultural development funding. GOVERNANCE With rising incomes in the developing world, demand for animal products will continue to surge; 74 percent for meat, 58 percent for dairy products and 500 percent for eggs. Meeting increasing demand is a major sustainability challenge. LIVESTOCK AND LANDSCAPES SUSTAINABILITY PATHWAYS WHY DOES LIVESTOCK MATTER FOR SUSTAINABILITY? £ The livestock sector is one of the key drivers of land-use change. Each year, 13 £ As livestock density increases and is in closer confines with wildlife and humans, billion hectares of forest area are lost due to land conversion for agricultural uses there is a growing risk of disease that threatens every single one of us: 66 percent of as pastures or cropland, for both food and livestock feed crop production.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Land Tax in Montana
    What follows is a summary of how Montana and seven other Western states handle agricultural land for property tax purposes. The states included are Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Colorado. The topics are Definition of Agricultural Land Use, Income and Acreage Requirements, and Methodology for Valuing Agricultural Land. There is some overlap in the topics because each state adds its own nuances to how it defines and values agricultural land and how it describes those procedures. Definition of Agricultural Land Use MONTANA The term "agricultural" for property tax purposes, refers to "the production of food, feed, and fiber commodities, livestock and poultry, bees, fruits and vegetables, and sod, ornamental, nursery, and horticultural crops that are raised, grown, or produced for commercial purposes." The term also refers to the raising of domestic animals and wildlife in domestication or a captive environment. [Section 15-1-101(a), MCA)] WYOMING The term "agricultural land", for property tax purposes, means "land which has been used or employed during the previous two years and presently is being used and employed for the primary purpose of obtaining a monetary profit as agricultural or horticultural use or any combination thereof is to be agricultural land...unless legally zoned otherwise by a zoning authority." [Section 39-13-101(a)(iii), WY ST] NORTH DAKOTA "'Agricultural property' means platted or unplatted lands used for raising agricultural crops or grazing farm animals, except lands platted and assessed as agricultural property prior to March 30, 1981, shall continue to be assessed as agricultural property until put to a use other than raising agricultural crops or grazing farm animals." North Dakota code also provides that "property platted on or after March 30, 1981, is not agricultural property when any four of the following conditions exist: a.
    [Show full text]
  • Increase Food Production Without Expanding Agricultural Land
    COURSE 2 Increase Food Production without Expanding Agricultural Land In addition to the demand-reduction measures addressed in Course 1, the world must boost the output of food on existing agricultural land. To approach the goal of net-zero expansion of agricultural land, improvements in crop and livestock productivity must exceed historical rates of yield gains. Chapter 10 assesses the land-use challenge, based on recent trend lines. Chapters 11–16 discuss possible ways to increase food production per hectare while adapting to climate change. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 10. Assessing the Challenge of Limiting Agricultural Land Expansion .............................147 Chapter 11. Menu Item: Increase Livestock and Pasture Productivity ........................................167 Chapter 12. Menu Item: Improve Crop Breeding to Boost Yields ..............................................179 Chapter 13. Menu Item: Improve Soil and Water Management ...............................................195 Chapter 14. Menu Item: Plant Existing Cropland More Frequently ........................................... 205 Chapter 15. Adapt to Climate Change ........................................................................... 209 Chapter 16. How Much Could Boosting Crop and Livestock Productivity Contribute to Closing the Land and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Gaps? .....................................................221 Creating a Sustainable Food Future 145 146 WRI.org CHAPTER 10 ASSESSING THE CHALLENGE OF LIMITING AGRICULTURAL LAND EXPANSION How hard will it be to stop net expansion of agricultural land? This chapter evaluates projections by other researchers of changes in land use and explains why we consider the most optimistic projections to be too optimistic. We discuss estimates of “yield gaps,” which attempt to measure the potential of farmers to increase yields given current crop varieties. Finally, we examine conflicting data about recent land-cover change and agricultural expansion to determine what they imply for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Intensive Agriculture: High Technology and Environmental Benefits
    University of Arkansas School of Law [email protected] $ (479) 575-7646 An Agricultural Law Research Article Sustainable Intensive Agriculture: High Technology and Environmental Benefits by Drew L. Kershen Originally published in KANSAS JOURNAL OF LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY 16 KAN. J. L. & PUB. POL’Y 424 (2007) www.NationalAgLawCenter.org SUSTAINABLE INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE: HIGH TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS Drew L. Kershen- I. PREFACE In the coming decades, agriculture faces three significant challenges. While these challenges will manifest themselves in ways unique to the cultural, socio-economic, and political conditions of different countries, developed and developing nations alike will face these challenges. Moreover, for the purposes of this article, the author assumes these challenges are truisms; consequently, there is no need to cite authority to support the author's identification and assertions. 1 Agriculture faces an agronomic challenge. Millions of people are still hungry in our world. Moreover, the world's population will continue to grow . for at least several decades. Agriculture must produce the food necessary to provide the people of the world-including those who presently have the money to feel secure about their daily bread-with an adequate supply of nutritious food'. "Agriculture must first be about food production for the survival and health of human beings, Agriculture faces an environmental challenge. It cannot produce the food needed for human beings if it exhausts or abuses Earth's soil, water, air, and biodiversity. Moreover, the general public, governments, and civil organizations from all societal sectors (academic, business, consumer, for­ profit and non-profit, public interest, and scientific) demand that agriculture Earl Sneed Centennial Professor of Law, University of Oklahoma, College of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia
    SAMVEL AVETISYAN AGRICULTURE AND FOOD PROCESSING IN ARMENIA YEREVAN 2010 Dedicated to the memory of the author’s son, Sergey Avetisyan Approved for publication by the Scientifi c and Technical Council of the RA Ministry of Agriculture Peer Reviewers: Doctor of Economics, Prof. Ashot Bayadyan Candidate Doctor of Economics, Docent Sergey Meloyan Technical Editor: Doctor of Economics Hrachya Tspnetsyan Samvel S. Avetisyan Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia – Limush Publishing House, Yerevan 2010 - 138 pages Photos courtesy CARD, Zaven Khachikyan, Hambardzum Hovhannisyan This book presents the current state and development opportunities of the Armenian agriculture. Special importance has been attached to the potential of agriculture, the agricultural reform process, accomplishments and problems. The author brings up particular facts in combination with historic data. Brief information is offered on leading agricultural and processing enterprises. The book can be a useful source for people interested in the agrarian sector of Armenia, specialists, and students. Publication of this book is made possible by the generous fi nancial support of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and assistance of the “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. The contents do not necessarily represent the views of USDA, the U.S. Government or “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. INTRODUCTION Food and Agriculture sector is one of the most important industries in Armenia’s economy. The role of the agrarian sector has been critical from the perspectives of the country’s economic development, food safety, and overcoming rural poverty. It is remarkable that still prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union, Armenia made unprecedented steps towards agrarian reforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Terminology for Integrated Resources Planning and Management
    Terminology for Integrated Resources Planning and Management February 1998 compiled and edited by Keya Choudhury and Louisa J.M. Jansen Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Preface An integrated approach to the planning and management of land resources has been developed by FAO since its appointment as Task Manager for the implementation of Agenda 21/Chapter 10 (UN, 1992). The new approach emphasizes two main characteristics: - the active participation of stakeholders at national, provincial and local levels in the process of planning and decision making; and - the integration of technical, institutional, legal and socio-economic aspects. To achieve the implementation of land-use planning and land management cooperation among experts from the disciplines involved and integration of the respective results are required in order to identify and evaluate all biophysical, socio- economic and legal attributes of the land. The glossary aims to contribute to the development of a common technical language in land resources planning and management. The terms, methods and concepts used by the different sectors involved should be understood by all partners in an identical way, independent from their backgrounds and professional experiences. The terms and definitions which are included in this glossary encompass conservation and management of soil, (fresh-) water and vegetation; climate; farming systems; crop production, livestock and fish production; land tenure and sustainable development. The comments and suggestions received
    [Show full text]
  • Albanian Agriculture: Dramatic Changes from a Very Centralized Economy to Free Market
    MEDlT N° 1/2000 ALBANIAN AGRICULTURE: DRAMATIC CHANGES FROM A VERY CENTRALIZED ECONOMY TO FREE MARKET. A STRATEGY FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ZYHDI TEQlA (*) - ISMAIL BEKA (**) - ENGJEU SHKRELI (***) lbania used to be wide real growth is also the closest and most ABSTRACT critical for agriculture sector A centralized econo- growth. my in east Europe. Albania started its transition to a market economy in 1991. It is one of The crisis of 1997 led to a the few economies in transition to have experienced positive agricultur­ At the beginning of '90 the al growth early in the reform process, as opposed to most Central and real deterioration in macro­ country was involved in a Eastern European countries which saw their agriculture sector contract economic stability. In the process of dramatic chan­ over several years. But since 1995, output growth of agricultural pro­ first six months, inflation duction has stagnated and early high sector growth rates have slowed. ges. To overcome this situation, a new Agricultural Development Strategy is escalated to 28 percent due Agriculture have been in elaborated. The dramatic changes that have occurred until now and the to supply shortages as secu­ the forward of this process. main topics of a new agricultural development strategy are presented in rity broke down and eco­ Reforms implemented after this paper. nomic activities were dis­ 1991 have completely chan­ rupted, and as public confi­ ged Albanian agriculture. RESUME dence plummeted. Over the Instead of some hundred same period, the exchange large scale agricultural co­ L'Albanie demarra sa transition vers (me economie de marcbe en 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Land Rights in Albania and Their Impact on Agriculture Land Market and Investments”
    Address: Rr. Leke Dukagjini, No. 11/1, Kati 4, Ap. 2, Tirana, Albania Tel/Fax: +355 42 225237 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.dsaconsult.com “Agricultural land rights in Albania and their impact on agriculture land market and investments” Dr. Edvin Zhllima, [email protected] (Contact Author) Dr. Drini Imami, [email protected] Faculty of Economics and Agribusiness, Agriculture University of Tirana & Development Solutions Associates Scientific reviewer: Prof. As. Engjell Skreli Note: This research work was based on a structured survey developed within the framework of the Project “Assessing land rights security in the context of agriculture and social development in rural Albania”, implemented by Development Solutions Associates and RRPP. CERGE-EI & GDN support enabled in-depth statistical analysis of the implemented survey, whose findings are presented in this report. 1 Abstract In early 1990s, a land redistribution reform was endorsed by the government in Albania and implemented in various forms by rural communities. This land reform resulted in small and fragmented farms, and generated property rights insecurity due to overlap of claims between pre-collectivization “old owners” and post-1990’ “new owners” and due to inefficient land institutional functioning. This paper analysis perceived land property (in) security, its causes and impact on land tenure. The theoretical background of this study consists in transaction costs approach to property rights theory and the empirical research is based on a structured survey. The land tenure insecurity is evident in Albania and its manifestation is weaker when ancestral rights are combined with legal rights. Possession of both informal and formal rights, accompanied with other farms physical related factors, positively affects agriculture land related investments.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Organic Production and IPM Guide for Potatoes
    http://hdl.handle.net/1813/42897 2016 Organic Production and IPM Guide for Potatoes NYS IPM Publication No. 138 Integrated Pest Management New York State Department of Agriculture & Markets Coordinating Editor Abby Seaman* (Cornell University, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, New York State IPM Program) Contributors and Resources George Abawi (Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant Microbe Biology, retired) Michael Glos (Kingbird Farm, Richford, NY) Beth Gugino (The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Plant Pathology) Don Halseth (Cornell University, Section of Horticulture, retired) Michael Helms* (Cornell University, Pesticide Management Education Program) Andy Leed (Starflower Farm, Candor NY) Margaret T. McGrath* (Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant Microbe Biology) Charles L. Mohler (Cornell University, Section of Soil and Crop Sciences, retired) Brian Nault* (Cornell University, Department of Entomology) Anusuya Rangarajan (Cornell University Horticulture-SIPS, Vegetable Crop Production ) Ward M. Tingey (Cornell University, Department of Entomology, Emeritus) Thomas A. Zitter (Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant Microbe Biology, retired) *Pesticide Information and Regulatory Compliance Staff Writers Mary Kirkwyland and Elizabeth Thomas (Cornell University, NYSAES, New York State IPM Program) Editing for the 2016 update Mary Kirkwyland (Cornell University, NYSAES, New York State IPM Program) Special Appreciation Format based on the Integrated Crop and Pest Management Guidelines for Commercial Vegetable Production (https://ipmguidelines.org/ Reference 1). Content Editors Stephen Reiners and Abby Seaman, with numerous discipline editors Funded through a grant from the New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets The information in this guide reflects the current authors’ best effort to interpret a complex body of scientific research, and to translate this into practical management options.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture: a Glossary of Terms, Programs, and Laws, 2005 Edition
    Agriculture: A Glossary of Terms, Programs, and Laws, 2005 Edition Updated June 16, 2005 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov 97-905 Agriculture: A Glossary of Terms, Programs, and Laws, 2005 Edition Summary The complexities of federal farm and food programs have generated a unique vocabulary. Common understanding of these terms (new and old) is important to those involved in policymaking in this area. For this reason, the House Agriculture Committee requested that CRS prepare a glossary of agriculture and related terms (e.g., food programs, conservation, forestry, environmental protection, etc.). Besides defining terms and phrases with specialized meanings for agriculture, the glossary also identifies acronyms, abbreviations, agencies, programs, and laws related to agriculture that are of particular interest to the staff and Members of Congress. CRS is releasing it for general congressional use with the permission of the Committee. The approximately 2,500 entries in this glossary were selected in large part on the basis of Committee instructions and the informed judgment of numerous CRS experts. Time and resource constraints influenced how much and what was included. Many of the glossary explanations have been drawn from other published sources, including previous CRS glossaries, those published by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and other federal agencies, and glossaries contained in the publications of various organizations, universities, and authors. In collecting these definitions, the compilers discovered that many terms have diverse specialized meanings in different professional settings. In this glossary, the definitions or explanations have been written to reflect their relevance to agriculture and recent changes in farm and food policies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Agriculture in Ensuring Food Security in Developing Countries: Considerations in the Context of the Problem of Sustainable Food Production
    sustainability Article The Role of Agriculture in Ensuring Food Security in Developing Countries: Considerations in the Context of the Problem of Sustainable Food Production Karolina Pawlak * and Małgorzata Kołodziejczak Department of Economics and Economic Policy in Agribusiness, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznan, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 May 2020; Accepted: 5 July 2020; Published: 7 July 2020 Abstract: Ensuring food security has become an issue of key importance to countries with different degrees of economic development, while the agricultural sector plays a strategic role in improving food availability. The aim of this paper is to identify relationships between the undernourishment scale and selected characteristics describing the agricultural sector within identified clusters of developing countries. Typological groups of countries were separated using Ward’s method. It results from the analyses that the greatest problems with maintaining food security are observed in the developing countries with a high share of agriculture in their Gross Domestic Product (GDP), adverse conditions hindering agricultural production and deficient infrastructure. Based on research results desirable and tailored strategies for food security improvement in individual clusters were developed. Promoting investments in agricultural infrastructure and extension services along with adopting measures aimed at increasing the households’ purchasing power, especially those in rural areas, appear to be key drivers for improving both food availability and food access. The paper focuses not only on identifying the reasons of undernourishment, but also contributes to recognition of the most effective ways to solve the hunger problem under a country’s unique conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Beginning Farmer's Guide to Agriculture Words, Terms and Definitions
    W 941 A Beginning Farmer’s Guide to Agriculture Words, Terms and Definitions A Beginning Farmer’s Guide to Agriculture Words, Terms and Defnitions l A Compiled by: Mitchell Mote, Extension Agent, Rutherford County Andrew P. Griffth, Associate Professor, Department of Agriculture and Resource Economics Kevin Rose, Extension County Director, Giles County Troy Dugger, Program Coordinator, Center for Proftable Agriculture INTRODUCTION This document is designed as a guide to help new or beginning farmers understand agriculture terminology. There are many terms related to different aspects of agriculture that may not be known to those who have not been involved in farming or have very little farming experience. Many of these terms and their meaning can be found in this document. While this list is not exhaustive of all the terms used in the feld of agriculture, it is prepared with the hope that the terms found in this guide will be useful and provide new and beginning farmers a foundation to better understand agriculture. How to “Talk” Farming Avian HOW TO TALK FARMING A beginning farmer's guide to Agriculture Words, Terms and Definitions Acidic: A soil pH of less than 7.0. The Apiary: A place where honeybees are Avian: Pertaining to poultry and/or fowl. lower the number, the more acidic the kept; colonies of bees in hives. soil will be. The pH scale ranges from Backgrounding: The feeding and 0 to 14, with 7 as neutral. Aquaculture: The commercial management of meat animals from production of aquatic plants or animals the time they are weaned as calves Acre: U.S.
    [Show full text]