Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov ESTTA Tracking number: ESTTA1095460 Filing date: 11/13/2020

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Proceeding 91253643 Party Defendant Gifted Invictus LLC Correspondence JEFFREY STURMAN Address STURMAN LAW LLC 8700 E JEFFERSON AVE #371706 DENVER, CO 80237 UNITED STATES Primary Email: tm-docketAsturmanlaw.com 720-772-1724

Submission Motion for Summary Judgment

Yes, the Filer previously made its initial disclosures pursuant to Trademark Rule 2.120(a); OR the motion for summary judgment is based on claim or issue pre- clusion, or lack of jurisdiction.

The deadline for pretrial disclosures for the first testimony period as originally set or reset: 11/14/2020 Filer's Name Jeffrey Sturman Filer's email [email protected] Signature /Jeffrey Sturman/ Date 11/13/2020 Attachments Motion for Summary Judgement_INVICTA S.p.A. v. Gifted Invictus LLC_Op pos- ition Proceeding Number 91253643.pdf(151506 bytes ) Exhibits for Motion for Summary Judgement_INVICTA S.p.A. v. Gifted In victus LLC_Opposition Proceeding Number 91253643.pdf(963706 bytes ) IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

INVICTA S.p.A., Opposition No. 91253643

Opposer, Serial No. 88577810 Trademark: GIFTED INVICTUS v.

Gifted Invictus LLC,

Applicant.

APPLICANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES 1

Introduction 4

Argument 5 Legal Standard for Summary Judgment 5 Legal Standard to Establish a Likelihood of Confusion 5 Context for Evaluating Trademarks for Likelihood of Confusion 7 Likelihood of Confusion Factors 8 Analysis of Specific DuPont Factors 10

Conclusion 12

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

Cases Page Number Application of Ferrero, 479 F.2d 1395 (CCPA 1973) 12 Carnation Co. v. California Growers Wineries, 97 F.2d 80, 25 CCPA 1277 (1938) 12

1 of 14 Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Procter & Gamble Co., 434 F.2d 794, 167 USPQ 713 (9th Cir. 1970) 8 Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986) 5 Champagne Louis Roederer, S.A. v. Delicato Vineyards, 148 F.3d 1373, 47 USPQ2d 1459 (Fed. Cir. 1998) 6, 11 Coach Servs., Inc. v. Triumph Learning LLC, 668 F.3d 1356, 101 USPQ2d 1713 (Fed. Cir. 2012) 8 Coca-Cola Company v. Gemini Rising, Inc., 346 F. Supp. 1183 (E.D.N.Y. 1972) 12 Coca-Cola Company v. Seven-Up Company 497 F.2d 1351 (CCPA 1974) 11 Cunningham v. Laser Golf Corp., 222 F.3d 943, 55 USPQ2d 1842 (Fed. Cir. 2000) 10 Dan Robbins Associates v. Questor Corp., 599 F.2d 1009 (CCPA 1979) 11 EI DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Yoshida Internat'l, Inc., 393 F. Supp. 502 (E.D.N.Y. 1975) 12 Electronic Design Sales Inc. v. Electronic Data Systems Corporation, 954 F. 2d 713, 21 USPQ2d 1388 8 Federated Foods, Inc. v. Fort Howard Paper Co., 544 F.2d 1098, 192 USPQ 24 (CCPA 1976) 8 Florence Mfg. Co. v. J. C. Dowd & Co., 178 F. 73 (2 Cir. 1910) 12 Franklin Mint Corp. v. Master Mfg. Co., 667 F.2d 1005, 212 USPQ 233 (CCPA 1981) 6, 11 Giant Food, Inc. v. Nation's Foodservice, Inc., 710 F.2d 1565, 218 USPQ 390, (Fed. Cir. 1983) 5 Helene Curtis Industries Inc. v. Suave Shoe Corp., 13 USPQ2d 1618 (TTAB 1989) 7 Herbko Intern., Inc. v. Kappa Books, Inc., 308 F.3d 1156 (Fed. Cir. 2002) 6 Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Packard Press, Inc., 281 F.3d 1261 (Fed. Cir. 2002) 6, 8 Hiram Walker & Sons v. Penn-Maryland Corporation, 79 F.2d 836 (2 Cir. 1935) 12 Homeowners Group, Inc. v. Home Marketing Specialists, Inc., 931 F.2d 1100 (6th Cir. 1991) 12 In Re Bed & Breakfast Registry, 791 F.2d 157, 229 USPQ 818 (Fed. Cir. 1986) 8 In re Coors Brewing Co., 343 F.3d 1340, 68 USPQ2d 1059, 1062 (Fed. Cir. 2003) 7 In re Cordua Rests. LP, 110 USPQ2d 1227, 1229 n.4 (TTAB 2014), aff’d, 823 F.3d 594, 118 USPQ2d 1632 (Fed. Cir. 2016) 9 In re Dixie Restaurants, Inc., 105 F.3d 1405, 1406 (Fed. Cir. 1997) 5, 10

2 of 14 In re E.I. DuPont DeNemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 1361, 177 USPQ 563, 567 (CCPA 1973) 6, 8, 10 In re Iolo Techs., LLC, 95 USPQ2d 1498 (TTAB 2010) 8 In re Max Capital Grp. Ltd., 93 USPQ2d 1243 (TTAB 2010) 9 In re Mighty Leaf Tea, 601 F.3d 1342, 94 USPQ2d 1257 (Fed. Cir. 2010) 8, 10 In Re National Data Corporation, 753 F.2d 1056, 224 USPQ 749 (Fed. Cir. 1985) 7, 11 In re Red Bull GmbH, 78 USPQ2d 1375 (TTAB 2006) 9

In re St. Helena Hospital, 774 F.3d 747, 113 USPQ2d 1082 (Fed. Cir. 2014) 7 In re Thor Tech, Inc., 90 USPQ2d 1634 (TTAB 2009) 9 Interstate Brands Corp. v. Celestial Seasonings, Inc., 576 F.2d 926, 198 USPQ 151 (CCPA 1978) 6 Kangol Ltd. v. KangaROOS U.S.A. Inc., 974 F.2d 161, 23 USPQ2d 1945 (Fed. Cir. 1992) 11 Keebler Co. v. Murray Bakery Prods., 866 F.2d 1386, 9 USPQ2d 1736 (Fed. Cir. 1989) 12 Kellogg Co. v. Pack'em Enters., 951 F.2d 330, 21 USPQ2d 1142 (Fed. Cir. 1991) 6, 10 Lincoln Logs Ltd. v. Lincoln Pre-Cut Log Homes, Inc., 971 F.2d 732 (Fed. Cir. 1992) 5 Magnavox Co. v. Multivox Corp. of America, 341 F.2d 139, 52 CCPA 1025 (1965) 7 New England Fish Co. v. The Hervin Co., 511 F.2d 562, 184 USPQ 817 (CCPA 1975) 11 Odom's Tennessee Pride Sausage, Inc. v. FF Acquisition, L.L.C., 600 F.3d 1343 (Fed. Cir. 2010) 10 Olde Tyme Foods Inc. v. Roundy’s Inc., 961 F.2d 200, 22 USPQ2d 1542 (Fed. Cir. 1992) 5 Packard Press v. Hewlett-Packard, 227 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2000) 7 Paula Payne Products Co. v. Johnson’s Publishing Co., 473 F.2d 901, 177 USPQ 76 (CCPA 1973) 7, 11 Price Candy Co. v. Gold Medal Candy Corp., 220 F.2d 759, 105 USPQ 266 (CCPA 1955) 10, 13

Recot Inc. v. M.C. Becton, 214 F.3d 1322, 54 USPQ2d 1894 (Fed. Cir. 2000) 6, 8 Shen Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. The Ritz Hotel Limited, 393 F.3d 1238 (Fed. Cir. 2004) 5, 6, 11

3 of 14 Sleepmaster Prods. Co. v. American Auto-Felt Corp., 241 F.2d 738, 113 USPQ 63 (CCPA 1957) 7 Specialty Brands, Inc. v. Coffee Bean Distribs., Inc., 748 F.2d 669 (Fed. Cir. 1984) 7 Spice Islands, Inc. v. Frank Tea & Spice Co., 505 F.2d 1293, 184 USPQ 35 (CCPA 1974) 7 Taubman Co. v. Webfeats Taubman Co. v. Webfeats, 319 F. 3d 770 (6th Cir. 2003) 12

Threshold.TV Inc. v. Metronome Enters. Inc., 96 USPQ2d 1031 (TTAB 2010) 10 Witco Chem. Co. v. Whitfield Chem. Co., 418 F.2d 1403, 164 USPQ 43 (CCPA 1969), aff’g 153 USPQ 412 (TTAB 1967) 8 Xtreme Lashes, LLC v. Xtended Beauty, Inc., 576 F.3d 221 (5th Cir. 2009) 8 Rules Page Number Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a) 4 Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c) 5 Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e) 5 Regulations Page Number 37 C.F.R. §2.127 4

I. Introduction

Applicant, Gifted Invictus LLC, (“Applicant”), by and through their undersigned legal counsel, submit Applicant’s Motion for Summary Judgement under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ​See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a); 37 C.F.R. §2.127. Applicant respectfully asks the Board to deny INVICTA S.p.A.’s (“Opposer”) claim in opposition of Applicant’s trademark

GIFTED INVICTUS under Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act on account of Opposer’s INVICTA trademarks.

There is no dispute as to any material fact relevant to the issue of likelihood of confusion between Applicant’s Trademark and Opposer’s Trademarks in connection with the goods and services as listed in Applicant’s trademark application and Opposer’s Trademark Registrations.

4 of 14 Applicant is therefore entitled to judgement as a matter of law on the grounds that no likelihood of confusion exists between Applicant’s Trademark and Opposer’s Trademarks.

II. Argument

A. Legal Standard for Summary Judgment

Summary judgment is appropriate when the record shows that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ.

P. 56(c); ​See ​Lincoln Logs Ltd. v. Lincoln Pre-Cut Log Homes, Inc.​, 971 F.2d 732, 734 (Fed.

Cir. 1992); ​Celotex Corp. v. Catrett​, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986). A dispute as to a material fact issue is genuine only if a reasonable fact finder viewing the entire record could resolve the dispute in favor of the nonmoving party. ​See ​Olde Tyme Foods Inc. v. Roundy’s Inc.​, 961 F.2d 200, 22 USPQ2d 1542, 1544 (Fed. Cir. 1992).

The nonmoving party may not rest on the “mere allegations” of their pleading and assertions of counsel, but must designate specific portions of the record or produce additional evidence showing the existence of a genuine issue of material fact for trial. ​See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e).

B. Legal Standard to Establish a Likelihood of Confusion

“Whether there is a likelihood of confusion is a question of law based on underlying facts, such as the similarity of the marks and the relatedness of the goods or services.” ​Shen

Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. The Ritz Hotel Limited​, 393 F.3d 1238, 1241 (Fed. Cir. 2004) (​citing

In re Dixie Restaurants, Inc.​, 105 F.3d 1405, 1406, 41 USPQ2d 1531 (Fed. Cir. 1997)); ​see ​also

Recot Inc. v. M.C. Becton​, 214 F.3d 1322, 1326, 54 USPQ2d 1894 (Fed. Cir. 2000). “Likelihood of confusion ‘is a legal conclusion’ and cannot be ‘admitted’ as a fact.” ​Giant Food, Inc. v.

5 of 14 Nation's Foodservice, Inc.​, 710 F.2d 1565, 1569, 218 USPQ 390, 394 (Fed. Cir. 1983);

Interstate Brands Corp. v. Celestial Seasonings, Inc.​, 576 F.2d 926, 929, 198 USPQ 151, 153 (CCPA 1978)).

The Board determines likelihood of confusion on a case-specific basis, using the factors set forth in ​DuPont​. ​See ​In re E.I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.​, 476 F.2d 1357, 1361, 177 USPQ

563, 567 (CCPA 1973). ​Recot Inc. v. M.C. Becton​, 214 F.3d at 1326. The Board does not need to consider every single DuPont factor. Rather, only factors that are relevant need be considered. ​See ​Shen Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Ritz Hotel Ltd.​, 393 F.3d at 1241. “We know of no reason why, in a particular case, a single DuPont factor may not be dispositive” and holding that ‘substantial and undisputed differences’ between two competing marks justified a conclusion of no likelihood of confusion on summary judgment.” ​Champagne Louis Roederer,

S.A. v. Delicato Vineyards​, 148 F.3d 1373, 1375, 47 USPQ2d 1459 (Fed. Cir. 1998) (​quoting

Kellogg Co. v. Pack'em Enters.​, 951 F.2d 330, 332-33, 21 USPQ2d 1142, 1144-45 (Fed. Cir. 1991)). The Board and federal courts throughout the United States continue to reinforce the foundational principle that the predominant inquiry in likelihood of confusion matters rests upon the similarity or dissimilarity of the trademarks themselves. ​See e.g., ​Herbko Intern., Inc. v.

Kappa Books, Inc.​, 308 F.3d 1156, 1165 (Fed. Cir. 2002) (​quoting ​In re E.I. DuPont DeNemours

& Co.​, 476 F.2d at 1361, 177 USPQ at 567; ​Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Packard Press, Inc.​, 281 F.3d 1261, 1265 (Fed. Cir. 2002)).

The trademarks at issue should not be analyzed in piecemeal. ​See ​Franklin Mint Corp. v.

Master Mfg. Co.​, 667 F.2d 1005, 1007, 212 USPQ 233, 234 (CCPA 1981). “The ultimate conclusion of similarity or dissimilarity of the marks must rest on consideration of the marks in their entirety.” ​Packard Press v. Hewlett-Packard​, 227 F.3d 1352, 1358 (Fed. Cir. 2000). While it is proper to afford more weight to particular portions of a trademark, such analysis “does not

6 of 14 excuse consideration of the other components of the mark as a whole.” ​Id​.( ​citing ​Sleepmaster

Prods. Co. v. American Auto-Felt Corp.​, 241 F.2d 738, 741, 113 USPQ 63, 66 (CCPA 1957)); see ​also ​In Re National Data Corporation​, 753 F.2d 1056, 1059, 224 USPQ 749 (Fed. Cir. 1985). “Arguments to the effect that one portion of a mark possesses no trademark significance leading to a direct comparison between only what remains is an erroneous approach.” ​Specialty

Brands, Inc. v. Coffee Bean Distribs., Inc.​, 748 F.2d 669, 673 (Fed. Cir. 1984) (​citing ​Spice

Islands, Inc. v. Frank Tea & Spice Co.​, 505 F.2d 1293, 1295, 184 USPQ 35, 37 (CCPA 1974)).

See​ ​also Magnavox Co. v. Multivox Corp. of America​, 341 F.2d 139, 52 CCPA 1025 (1965).

A. Context for Evaluating Trademarks for Likelihood of Confusion

“[S]imilarity is not a binary factor but is a matter of degree.” ​In re St. Helena Hospital​, 774

F.3d 747, 113 USPQ2d 1082, 1085 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (​quoting ​In re Coors Brewing Co.​, 343 F.3d 1340, 68 USPQ2d 1059, 1062 (Fed. Cir. 2003)). When determining whether a likelihood of confusion exists, the proper inquiry is not an evaluation of whether the trademarks at issue, or the goods or services in connection with those trademarks are likely to be confused by the consuming public. Rather, the correct manner of analysis is into whether a likelihood of confusion exists regarding the source or sponsorship of the goods or services that the trademarks are used in connection with. ​See​, e.g., ​Paula Payne Products Co. v. Johnson’s

Publishing Co.​, 473 F.2d 901, 902, 177 USPQ 76, 77 (CCPA 1973) (“[T]he question is not whether people will confuse the marks, but rather whether the marks will confuse people into believing that the goods they identify emanate from the same source.”) ​See ​also ​Helene Curtis

Industries Inc. v. Suave Shoe Corp.​, 13 USPQ2d 1618, 1624 (TTAB 1989). Likelihood of confusion requires “a probability of confusion”, not just a “mere possibility.”

Xtreme Lashes, LLC v. Xtended Beauty, Inc.​, 576 F.3d 221, 226 (5th Cir. 2009). “We are not

7 of 14 concerned with mere theoretical possibilities of confusion, deception, or mistake or with de minimis situations but with the practicalities of the commercial world, with which the trademark laws deal.” ​Electronic Design Sales Inc. v. Electronic Data Systems Corporation​, 954 F. 2d 713,

21 USPQ2d 1388, 1391, (​quoting ​Witco Chem. Co. v. Whitfield Chem. Co.​, 418 F.2d 1403, 164

USPQ 43, 44-45 (CCPA 1969), aff’g 153 USPQ 412 (TTAB 1967)); ​see ​also ​Carter-Wallace,

Inc. v. Procter & Gamble Co.​, 434 F.2d 794, 804, 167 USPQ 713, 720 (9th Cir. 1970). “No mechanical rule determines likelihood of confusion, and each case requires weighing of the facts and circumstances of the particular mark.” ​In re Mighty Leaf Tea​, 601 F.3d 1342, 94 USPQ2d 1257, 1259 (Fed. Cir. 2010).

C. Likelihood of Confusion Factors

The only ​du Pont factor at issue in this matter is the entirely dissimilar nature of the trademarks at issue. ​See ​du Pont​, 476 F.2d at 1362-63, 177 USPQ at 568-69. “This factor examines the relevant features of the marks, including appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression.” ​Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Packard Press, Inc.​, 281 F.3d at 1265-1266

(​citing ​Recot, Inc. v. M.C. Becton​, 214 F.3d at 1329). ​See ​also ​In Re Bed & Breakfast Registry​, 791 F.2d 157, 159, 229 USPQ 818, 819 (Fed. Cir. 1986). This factor is a key consideration in any likelihood of confusion analysis. ​See ​Federated Foods, Inc. v. Fort Howard Paper Co.​, 544

F.2d 1098, 1103, 192 USPQ 24, 29 (CCPA 1976); ​In re Iolo Techs., LLC​, 95 USPQ2d 1498,

1499 (TTAB 2010); ​In re Max Capital Grp. Ltd.​, 93 USPQ2d 1243, 1244 (TTAB 2010); ​In re

Thor Tech, Inc.​, 90 USPQ2d 1634, 1635 (TTAB 2009). “The proper test is not a side-by-side comparison of the marks, but instead whether the marks are sufficiently similar in terms of their commercial impression such that persons who encounter the marks would be likely to assume a connection between the parties.” ​Coach

8 of 14 Servs., Inc. v. Triumph Learning LLC​, 668 F.3d 1356, 1377, 101 USPQ2d 1713, 1721 (Fed. Cir. 2012). Applicant’s Trademark and Opposer’s Trademarks are distinctly different in their sight, sound, and commercial impression.

Applicant’s Trademark, GIFTED INVICTUS, begins with the word ‘gifted’, a two syllable term with numerous connotations on its own. Merriam-Webster defines ‘gifted’ as “having great natural ability; revealing a special gift”.1 Cambridge dictionary defines ‘gifted’ as “having special ability in a particular subject or activity”.2 Therefore, a consumer who encounters Applicant’s

Trademark is immediately presented with a situation which requires them to determine which definition of the term ‘gifted’ is applicable. Thereafter, the consumer is presented with the term,

‘invictus’, which is not defined by Merriam-Webster or Cambridge dictionaries.3 4 As such, a consumer presented with Applicant’s Trademark has no definitive definition to rely upon. Rather, the meaning of the trademark GIFTED INVICTUS is left open to interpretation.

Applicant respectfully requests that the Board take judicial notice of the preceding dictionary definitions based upon its precedent of doing so when the record shows that the evidence is “the electronic equivalent of a print publication”. ​In re Red Bull GmbH​, 78 USPQ2d

1375, 1378 (TTAB 2006). ​See ​also ​In re Cordua Rests. LP, 110 USPQ2d 1227, 1229 n.4 (TTAB

2014), aff’d, 823 F.3d 594, 118 USPQ2d 1632 (Fed. Cir. 2016); ​Threshold.TV Inc. v. Metronome

Enters. Inc.​, 96 USPQ2d 1031, 1038 n.14 (TTAB 2010).

1 ​See​ Exhibit 1 showing the definition of ‘gifted’ as displayed on merriam-webster.com. 2 See Exhibit 2 showing the definition of ‘gifted’ as displayed on dictionary.cambridge.org. 3 ​ ​ ​See​ Exhibit 3 showing the lack of an entry in the Merriam Webster dictionary for the term ‘invictus’, as displayed on merriam-webster.com. 4 ​See​ Exhibit 4 showing the lack of an entry in the Cambridge dictionary for the term ‘invictus’, as displayed on dictionary.cambridge.org.

9 of 14 Opposer’s Trademarks for INVICTA, consists of one word, which contains three syllables. The English translation of Opposer’s “INVICTA” trademarks is “invincible”, as evidenced by the translation statement included on the associated registrations.5

D. Analysis of Specific DuPont Factors A determination of likelihood of confusion between two trademarks is made based upon the specific facts and evidence made of record in each case. ​See ​In re Dixie Restaurants, Inc.​, 105 F.3d at 1406-07, 41 USPQ2d at 1533. “No mechanical rule determines likelihood of confusion, and each case requires weighing of the facts and circumstances of the particular mark." ​In re Mighty Leaf Tea​, 601 F.3d 1342, 1346, 94 USPQ2d 1257, 1259 (Fed. Cir 2010).

Additionally, any one of the DuPont factors may control a particular case. ​See ​id​. ​See ​also ​du

Pont​, 476 F.2d at 1361-62, 177; ​Cunningham v. Laser Golf Corp​., 222 F.3d 943, 946, 55 USPQ2d 1842, 1845 (Fed. Cir. 2000). After comparing the marks in appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression, it is blatantly clear that they are different in far more ways than they are alike. ​See ​Price Candy Co. v. Gold Medal Candy Corp.​, 220 F.2d 759, 105 USPQ 266 (CCPA 1955) (where there are both similarities and differences in the marks, these must be weighed against one another to see which predominate). This alone should be sufficient for Applicant to prevail. ​See ​Odom's Tennessee Pride Sausage, Inc. v. FF Acquisition,

L.L.C.​, 600 F.3d 1343, 1346-47 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (affirming summary judgment based on dissimilarity between marks alone, finding that individual aspects of the marks collectively created a difference in overall commercial impression); ​Kellogg Co. v. Pack'Em Enters. Inc.​, 951 F.2d 330, 21 USPQ2d 1142 (granting summary judgment solely based on dissimilarity between

5 ​See​ Exhibit 5 which shows printouts from the TSDR system of the USPTO for U.S. Registration Numbers 2151279, 3976519, 5409829, and 5409408.

10 of 14 the marks “Froot Loops” and “Frootee Ice,” which are arguably more similar than the marks at issue in the instant proceeding).

“What is important is not whether people will confuse the marks, but whether the marks will be likely to confuse people into believing that the goods or services they are purchasing emanate from the same source.” ​Kangol Ltd. v. KangaROOS U.S.A. Inc.​, 974 F.2d 161, 23

USPQ2d 1945 (Fed. Cir. 1992) (​citing ​Paula Payne Prods. Co. v. Johnson Publishing Co.​, 473 F.2d 901, 177 USPQ at 77).

The trademarks at issue should not be analyzed in piecemeal. ​See​ ​Franklin Mint Corp. v.

Master Mfg. Co.​, 667 F.2d at 1007, 212 USPQ at 234. “We have said, so often as not to require citation of authority, that marks must be viewed as the public sees them, i.e., in their entireties.”

Coca-Cola Company v. Seven-Up Company​ 497 F.2d 1351 (CCPA 1974). The analysis cannot be predicated on dissecting the marks into their various components; that is, the decision must be based on the entire marks, not just part of the marks. ​See​ ​In Re National Data Corporation​,

753 F.2d at 1058, 224 USPQ at 751. ​See​ ​also​ ​Franklin Mint Corp. v. Master Mfg. Co.​, 212 USPQ at 234. “The overall commercial impression derived from viewing the marks in their entireties is controlling.” ​Dan Robbins Associates v. Questor Corp.​, 599 F.2d 1009, 1013 (CCPA

1979) (​citing​ ​New England Fish Co. v. The Hervin Co.​, 511 F.2d 562, 563, 184 USPQ 817, 818 (CCPA 1975)).

Such unequivocal level of dissimilarity precludes a finding of likelihood of confusion. ​See

Shen Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Ritz Hotel Ltd.​, 393 F.3d at 1243; ​Champagne Louis Roederer,

S.A. v. Delicato Vineyards​, 148 F.3d at 1375 (affirming TTAB determination of no likelihood of confusion between CRISTAL and CRYSTAL CREEK wines).

11 of 14 I. Conclusion

As is often the case, the most important factor in this proceeding is the “dissimilarity in commercial impression” of the trademarks at issue. ​Keebler Co. v. Murray Bakery Prods.​, 866 F.2d 1386, 1388, 9 USPQ2d 1736, 1739 (Fed. Cir. 1989). “The ultimate question remains whether relevant consumers are likely to believe that the products or services offered by the parties are affiliated in some way.” ​Homeowners Group, Inc. v. Home Marketing Specialists,

Inc.​, 931 F.2d 1100, 1107 (6th Cir. 1991). The mere fact that one trademark causes a consumer to think of another trademark does not on its own demonstrate a likelihood of confusion regarding the source of the goods. ​See ​Application of Ferrero​, 479 F.2d 1395, 1397 (CCPA 1973). Therefore, the question in this case, as is the concern in all trademark matters, is whether consumers of Applicant’s goods are likely to think that the origin of such goods is the cited trademark. ​See ​Taubman Co. v. Webfeats Taubman Co. v. Webfeats​, 319 F. 3d 770, 776 (6th Cir. 2003).

The correct manner of analysis is to determine the perspective of the average consumer.

See ​EI DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Yoshida Internat'l, Inc.​, 393 F. Supp. 502, 513 (E.D.N.Y.

1975) (​citing ​Florence Mfg. Co. v. J. C. Dowd & Co.​, 178 F. 73, 75 (2 Cir. 1910)); ​Coca-Cola

Company v. Gemini Rising, Inc.​, 346 F. Supp. 1183, 1190 (E.D.N.Y. 1972). While the average consumer is not necessarily a trademark or brand expert, the “purchasing public must be credited with at least a modicum of intelligence,” or “with a minimum capacity for discrimination.”

EI DuPont De Nemours & Co. 393 F. Supp. at 513 (​quoting ​Carnation Co. v. California Growers

Wineries​, 97 F.2d 80, 81, 25 CCPA 1277 (1938)); ​Hiram Walker & Sons v. Penn-Maryland

Corporation​, 79 F.2d 836, 839 (2 Cir. 1935). The differences between Applicant’s and

12 of 14 Opposer’s trademarks predominate any similarities between them. ​See ​Price Candy Co. 220 F.2d 759, 105 USPQ 266.

Therefore, Applicant respectfully asserts that the Board should deny Opposer’s opposition to Applicant’s trademark registration, and grant Applicant’s Motion for Summary

Judgement.

Dated: November 13, 2020 Respectfully submitted, /Jeffrey Sturman/ Jeffrey Sturman, Esq. Sturman Law, LLC 8700 E Jefferson Ave # 371706 Denver, CO 80237 Phone: 720-772-1724 Attorney for Applicant

13 of 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Jeffrey Sturman, as attorney for Gifted Invictus LLC hereby certify that a true and complete copy of Applicant’s Motion for Summary Judgement has been served upon Opposer,

INVICTA S.p.A., by sending the filed documents on November 13, 2020 to the correspondence email address as listed on TTABBVUE: [email protected] and [email protected].

/Jeffrey Sturman/ Jeffrey Sturman, Esq. Sturman Law, LLC 8700 E Jefferson Ave # 371706 Denver, CO 80237 Phone: 720-772-1724 Attorney for Applicant

14 of 14 5/16/2019 EXHIBITS 1-50 - Google Docs

EXHIBIT 1

https://docs.google.com/document/d/19teLHp_VPEvoP_xmaiYZOw0unQ26P9VRZjIiHlAO888/edit 1/50 10/4/2020 Gifted | Definition of Gifted by Merriam-Webster

SINCE 1828

GAMES BROWSE THESAURUS WORD OF THE DAY WORDS AT PLAY

LOG IN REGISTER

settings SAVED WORDS

gifted

dictionary thesaurus view recents

Login or Register Hello,

GAMES BROWSE THESAURUS WORD OF THE DAY WORDS AT PLAY SETTINGS

SAVED WORDS view recents

Anti Fatigue Comfort Floor Mat by Sky Mat… 6,193 $47.97 Add to Cart

gifted

adjective Save Word https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gifted 1/12 10/4/2020 Gifted | Definition of Gifted by Merriam-Webster To save this word, you'll need to log in.

Log In gift·ed | \ ˈgif-təd \

Definition of gifted

1 : having great natural ability : talented gifted children 2 : revealing a special gift gifted voices Other Words from gifted More Example Sentences Learn More about gifted

Keep scrolling for more

Other Words from gifted

giftedly adverb giftedness noun

Examples of gifted in a Sentence

He's an extremely gifted student. a school for gifted children Recent Examples on the Web Kentrell Mason is just one of several gifted offensive linemen in Humble ISD. — Marcus Gutierrez, Houston Chronicle, "Football: 12 Humble ISD players to watch when the season kicks off tommorow," 24 Sep. 2020 Because for a gifted hitchhiker like lanternfly, the question is not really if but when. — Marc Mcandrews, Smithsonian Magazine, "Can Scientists Stop the Plague of the Spotted Lanternfly?," 22 Sep. 2020

These example sentences are selected automatically from various online news sources to reflect current usage of the word 'gifted.' Views expressed in the examples do not represent the opinion of Merriam-Webster or its editors. Send us feedback.

See More

First Known Use of gifted

1644, in the meaning defined at sense 1

Keep scrolling for more

Learn More about gifted

Share gifted

Post the Definition of gifted to Facebook Share the Definition of gifted on Twitter

Time Traveler for gifted

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gifted 2/12 5/16/2019 EXHIBITS 1-50 - Google Docs

EXHIBIT 2

https://docs.google.com/document/d/19teLHp_VPEvoP_xmaiYZOw0unQ26P9VRZjIiHlAO888/edit 2/50 10/6/2020 GIFTED | definition in the Cambridge English Dictionary

Search English    

Meaning of gifted in English   gifted adjective

US  /ˈɡɪf.tɪd/ UK  /ˈɡɪf.tɪd/

  C1

having special ability in a particular subject or activity:

• a gifted dancer/musician

 Thesaurus: synonyms, antonyms, and examples

good at doing something because of practice skillful She's a skillful driver. skilled He's a skilled mechanic. good at She's very good at dealing with people. able She's a very able student. gifted She's a gifted musician. talented He's a very talented actor. See more results »

 Thesaurus: synonyms, antonyms, and examples

  smart, or having a special ability:

• Schools often fail to meet the needs of gifted children.

Synonym Thistalented website uses cookies. For more information, please visit the Privacy and Cookies Policy. Accept and hide this message  https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/gifted 1/6 5/16/2019 EXHIBITS 1-50 - Google Docs

EXHIBIT 3

https://docs.google.com/document/d/19teLHp_VPEvoP_xmaiYZOw0unQ26P9VRZjIiHlAO888/edit 3/50 10/6/2020 Invictus - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

SINCE 1828

GAMES BROWSE THESAURUS WORD OF THE DAY WORDS AT PLAY

LOG IN REGISTER

settings SAVED WORDS

invictus

dictionary thesaurus view recents

Login or Register Hello,

GAMES BROWSE THESAURUS WORD OF THE DAY WORDS AT PLAY SETTINGS

SAVED WORDS view recents

“invictus”

The word you've entered isn't in the dictionary. Click on a spelling suggestion below or try again using the search bar above. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/invictus 1/5 5/16/2019 EXHIBITS 1-50 - Google Docs

EXHIBIT 4

https://docs.google.com/document/d/19teLHp_VPEvoP_xmaiYZOw0unQ26P9VRZjIiHlAO888/edit 4/50 10/6/2020 invictus - Did you spell it correctly. Alternative spellings in the British English Dictionary - Cambridge Dictionary (US)

Search English    

FIND YOUR NEXT FAVORITE

START FREE TRIAL

Free trial is for new customers only. Restrictions apply.

Search suggestions for invictus

We have these words with similar spellings or pronunciations:

invites

invidious

convicts

evicts

invents

inverts

invests

invite

invited

invitee

This website uses cookies. For more information, please visit the Privacy and Cookies Policy. Test your vocabulary with our fun image quizzes Accept and hide this message  https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/spellcheck/english/?q=invictus 1/4 5/16/2019 EXHIBITS 1-50 - Google Docs

EXHIBIT 5

https://docs.google.com/document/d/19teLHp_VPEvoP_xmaiYZOw0unQ26P9VRZjIiHlAO888/edit 5/50 10/6/2020 Status Search SN 2151279

For assistance with TSDR, email [email protected] and include your serial number, the document you are looking for, and a screenshot of any error messages you have received.

STATUS DOCUMENTS MAINTENANCE Back to Search Print

Generated on: This page was generated by TSDR on 2020-10-06 05:43:32 EDT

Mark: INVICTA

US Serial Number: 75089464 Application Filing Date: Apr. 16, 1996

US Registration Number: 2151279 Registration Date: Apr. 14, 1998

Register: Principal

Mark Type: Trademark

TM5 Common Status LIVE/REGISTRATION/Issued and Active Descriptor: The trademark application has been registered with the Office.

Status: The registration has been renewed.

Status Date: Aug. 02, 2018

Publication Date: May 20, 1997 Notice of Allowance Date: Aug. 12, 1997

Mark Information

Mark Literal Elements: INVICTA

Standard Character Claim: No

Mark Drawing Type: 5 - AN ILLUSTRATION DRAWING WITH WORD(S) /LETTER(S)/ NUMBER(S) INSTYLIZED FORM

Translation: The English translation of the mark is "invincible" from the Latin.

Related Properties Information

Goods and Services

Privacy - Terms Note: https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=2151279&caseSearchType=US_APPLICATION&caseType=DEFAULT&searchType=statusSearch 1/2 10/6/2020 Status Search SN 2151279 The following symbols indicate that the registrant/owner has amended the goods/services: Brackets [..] indicate deleted goods/services; Double parenthesis ((..)) identify any goods/services not claimed in a Section 15 affidavit of incontestability; and Asterisks *..* identify additional (new) wording in the goods/services. For: [ shorts, Bermuda shorts, ] clothes, trousers, [ overalls, track-suits, top, body-suits, T-shirts, ] shirts, polo-neck shirts, plush shirts, [ tricot shirts, pile shirts, waistcoats, sports jackets in different fabrics, jackets in different fabrics, cloaks, swimsuits, scarfs, hats, ] gloves, [ caps, gaiters, spats, shoes, ponchos, ] ski gloves

International Class(es): 025 - Primary Class U.S Class(es): 022, 039

Class Status: ACTIVE

Basis: 1(a)

First Use: 1961 Use in Commerce: 1961

Basis Information (Case Level)

Current Owner(s) Information

Owner Name: INVICTA SPA

Owner Address: Via Fornacino 96 Leini ITALY 10040

Legal Entity Type: JOINT STOCK COMPANY State or Country Where ITALY Organized:

Attorney/Correspondence Information

Prosecution History

TM Staff and Location Information

Assignment Abstract Of Title Information - Click to Load

Proceedings - Click to Load

Privacy - Terms https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=2151279&caseSearchType=US_APPLICATION&caseType=DEFAULT&searchType=statusSearch 2/2

10/6/2020 Status Search SN 3976519

For assistance with TSDR, email [email protected] and include your serial number, the document you are looking for, and a screenshot of any error messages you have received.

STATUS DOCUMENTS MAINTENANCE Back to Search Print

Generated on: This page was generated by TSDR on 2020-10-06 05:46:29 EDT

Mark: INVICTA

US Serial Number: 79009560 Application Filing Date: Nov. 22, 2004

US Registration Number: 3976519 Registration Date: Jun. 14, 2011

Register: Principal

Mark Type: Trademark

TM5 Common Status LIVE/REGISTRATION/Issued and Active Descriptor: The trademark application has been registered with the Office.

Status: A partial Section 71 declaration has been accepted.

Status Date: Mar. 05, 2018

Publication Date: Jun. 06, 2006

Mark Information

Mark Literal Elements: INVICTA

Standard Character Claim: Yes. The mark consists of standard characters without claim to any particular font style, size, or color.

Mark Drawing Type: 4 - STANDARD CHARACTER MARK

Translation: The English translation of the word INVICTA in the mark is INVINCIBLE.

Related Properties Information

Goods and Services

Note: Privacy - Terms https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=3976519&caseSearchType=US_APPLICATION&caseType=DEFAULT&searchType=statusSearch 1/3 10/6/2020 Status Search SN 3976519 The following symbols indicate that the registrant/owner has amended the goods/services: Brackets [..] indicate deleted goods/services; Double parenthesis ((..)) identify any goods/services not claimed in a Section 15 affidavit of incontestability; and Asterisks *..* identify additional (new) wording in the goods/services. For: [ scuba masks and underwater sport goggles, safety goggles, safety helmets ]

International Class(es): 009 - Primary Class U.S Class(es): 021, 023, 026, 036, 038

Class Status: SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Basis: 66(a)

For: [ Paper and cardboard, stationery, ] note books, note pads, school diaries; soft and hard school supply pouches for holding pens and pencils among other articles; pencil sharpeners, drawing rulers, erasers, personal organizers, [ address books, ] folders

International Class(es): 016 - Primary Class U.S Class(es): 002, 005, 022, 023, 029, 037, 038, 050

Class Status: ACTIVE

Basis: 66(a)

For: Leather and imitation leather bags, suitcases, shoulder bags, wallets, [ coin purses, ] rucksacks, school bags, sports bags, waistpacks [, umbrellas ]

International Class(es): 018 - Primary Class U.S Class(es): 001, 002, 003, 022, 041

Class Status: ACTIVE

Basis: 66(a)

For: Clothing, namely, jackets, insulated jackets, down jackets, rain jackets, fleece jackets, wind jackets, vests, insulated vests, down vests, [ fleece vests, wind vests, ] pants, short pants, [ jerseys, ] shirts, T-shirts, gloves, mittens, headbands; headgear, namely, caps; footwear, namely, sports shoes, [ boots, ] sneakers

International Class(es): 025 - Primary Class U.S Class(es): 022, 039

Class Status: ACTIVE

Basis: 66(a)

Basis Information (Case Level)

Current Owner(s) Information

Owner Name: Invicta Spa

Owner Address: Via Fornacino, 96 Leinì (TO) ITALY I-10040 Privacy - Terms https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=3976519&caseSearchType=US_APPLICATION&caseType=DEFAULT&searchType=statusSearch 2/3 10/6/2020 Status Search SN 3976519 Legal Entity Type: JOINT STOCK COMPANY State or Country Where ITALY Organized:

Attorney/Correspondence Information

Prosecution History

International Registration Information (Section 66a)

TM Staff and Location Information

Assignment Abstract Of Title Information - Click to Load

Proceedings - Click to Load

Privacy - Terms https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=3976519&caseSearchType=US_APPLICATION&caseType=DEFAULT&searchType=statusSearch 3/3

10/6/2020 Status Search SN 5409829

For assistance with TSDR, email [email protected] and include your serial number, the document you are looking for, and a screenshot of any error messages you have received.

STATUS DOCUMENTS MAINTENANCE Back to Search Print

Generated on: This page was generated by TSDR on 2020-10-06 05:47:22 EDT

Mark: INVICTA

US Serial Number: 86301552 Application Filing Date: Jun. 05, 2014

US Registration Number: 5409829 Registration Date: Feb. 27, 2018

Register: Principal

Mark Type: Trademark

TM5 Common Status LIVE/REGISTRATION/Issued and Active Descriptor: The trademark application has been registered with the Office.

Status: Registered. The registration date is used to determine when post-registration maintenance documents are due.

Status Date: Feb. 27, 2018

Publication Date: Jun. 16, 2015

Mark Information

Mark Literal Elements: INVICTA

Standard Character Claim: Yes. The mark consists of standard characters without claim to any particular font style, size, or color.

Mark Drawing Type: 4 - STANDARD CHARACTER MARK

Translation: The English translation of "Invicta" in the mark is "invincible".

Related Properties Information

Foreign Information Privacy - Terms https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=5409829&caseSearchType=US_APPLICATION&caseType=DEFAULT&searchType=statusSearch 1/3 10/6/2020 Status Search SN 5409829 Goods and Services

Note: The following symbols indicate that the registrant/owner has amended the goods/services: Brackets [..] indicate deleted goods/services; Double parenthesis ((..)) identify any goods/services not claimed in a Section 15 affidavit of incontestability; and Asterisks *..* identify additional (new) wording in the goods/services. For: Rucksacks; backpacks; school bags, shoulder bags for carrying infants, reusable shopping bags; travelling bags and duffle bags; bags and holdalls for sports; handbags; beach bags; backpacks for hiking and climbing, satchels, briefcases, pocket wallets; purses; key cases; hip bags; suitcases; umbrellas, trunks; walking sticks; overnight suitcases; vanity cases sold empty, wheeled shopping bags and wheeled suitcases

International Class(es): 018 - Primary Class U.S Class(es): 001, 002, 003, 022, 041

Class Status: ACTIVE

Basis: 44(e)

For: Technical apparel for maintaining physical shape, namely, trousers, sport suits, shorts; swimwear, bathing suits, bikinis, slips, swimsuit shorts, swimming caps; pareos, bras, ponchos; underwear, namely, body shapers, boxers, T-shirts, tank tops, bras, leotards, shorts, slips, thongs; leather wear and lounge wear, namely, leather hats and lounge pants; bathrobes, nightdresses, pajamas; pants, trousers, overalls, jeans, shorts, jackets, coats, waistcoats, overcoats, waterproof clothing, namely, jackets and pants; hosiery, knitwear, namely, sweaters, cardigans, fleece pullover tops, jumpers, woven shirts; dresses, track suits, shirts, polo shirts, nightshirts for men, T-shirts, undershirts, dresses, skirts, trousers, skirts, gowns; socks; dressing gowns; waist bands; balaclavas, scarves, silk scarves, neckwear, neckerchiefs, neck scarves, bandanas, roll necks, namely, neck gaiters; gloves and mittens, ski gloves; headwear, namely, hats, caps, bandanas, visors, wrist bands; belts and ties; shoes, sneakers, boots, sandals, slippers, sport and athletic shoes, studs for golf shoes or sport shoes, mountaineering shoes; ski boots and trekking boots, gaiters, bands for protecting face and ears from cold

International Class(es): 025 - Primary Class U.S Class(es): 022, 039

Class Status: ACTIVE

Basis: 44(e)

Basis Information (Case Level)

Current Owner(s) Information

Owner Name: Invicta S.p.A.

Owner Address: via Fornacino 96 Leini ITALY 10040

Legal Entity Type: società per azioni (spa) State or Country Where ITALY Organized: Privacy - Terms https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=5409829&caseSearchType=US_APPLICATION&caseType=DEFAULT&searchType=statusSearch 2/3 10/6/2020 Status Search SN 5409829 Attorney/Correspondence Information

Prosecution History

TM Staff and Location Information

Assignment Abstract Of Title Information - Click to Load

Proceedings - Click to Load

Privacy - Terms https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=5409829&caseSearchType=US_APPLICATION&caseType=DEFAULT&searchType=statusSearch 3/3 Reg. No. 5,409,829 Invicta S.p.A. (ITALY società per azioni (spa) ) Via Fornacino 96 Registered Feb. 27, 2018 Leini, ITALY 10040 CLASS 18: Rucksacks; backpacks; school bags, shoulder bags for carrying infants, reusable Int. Cl.: 18, 25 shopping bags; travelling bags and duffle bags; bags and holdalls for sports; handbags; beach bags; backpacks for hiking and climbing, satchels, briefcases, pocket wallets; purses; key Trademark cases; hip bags; suitcases; umbrellas, trunks; walking sticks; overnight suitcases; vanity cases Principal Register sold empty, wheeled shopping bags and wheeled suitcases CLASS 25: Technical apparel for maintaining physical shape, namely, trousers, sport suits, shorts; swimwear, bathing suits, bikinis, slips, swimsuit shorts, swimming caps; pareos, bras, ponchos; underwear, namely, body shapers, boxers, T-shirts, tank tops, bras, leotards, shorts, slips, thongs; leather wear and lounge wear, namely, leather hats and lounge pants; bathrobes, nightdresses, pajamas; pants, trousers, overalls, jeans, shorts, jackets, coats, waistcoats, overcoats, waterproof clothing, namely, jackets and pants; hosiery, knitwear, namely, sweaters, cardigans, fleece pullover tops, jumpers, woven shirts; dresses, track suits, shirts, polo shirts, nightshirts for men, T-shirts, undershirts, dresses, skirts, trousers, skirts, gowns; socks; dressing gowns; waist bands; balaclavas, scarves, silk scarves, neckwear, neckerchiefs, neck scarves, bandanas, roll necks, namely, neck gaiters; gloves and mittens, ski gloves; headwear, namely, hats, caps, bandanas, visors, wrist bands; belts and ties; shoes, sneakers, boots, sandals, slippers, sport and athletic shoes, studs for golf shoes or sport shoes, mountaineering shoes; ski boots and trekking boots, gaiters, bands for protecting face and ears from cold

THE MARK CONSISTS OF STANDARD CHARACTERS WITHOUT CLAIM TO ANY PARTICULAR FONT STYLE, SIZE OR COLOR

OWNER OF ITALY REG. NO. 945484, DATED 11-22-2004, RENEWED AS REG. NO. 945484, DATED 05-21-2014, EXPIRES 05-21-2024

OWNER OF U.S. REG. NO. 2109406, 2151279, 3976519

The English translation of "Invicta" in the mark is "invincible".

SER. NO. 86-301,552, FILED 06-05-2014 10/6/2020 Status Search SN 5409408

For assistance with TSDR, email [email protected] and include your serial number, the document you are looking for, and a screenshot of any error messages you have received.

STATUS DOCUMENTS MAINTENANCE Back to Search Print

Generated on: This page was generated by TSDR on 2020-10-06 05:48:17 EDT

Mark: INVICTA

US Serial Number: 79146181 Application Filing Date: Dec. 13, 2013

US Registration Number: 5409408 Registration Date: Feb. 27, 2018

Register: Principal

Mark Type: Service Mark

TM5 Common Status LIVE/REGISTRATION/Issued and Active Descriptor: The trademark application has been registered with the Office.

Status: Registered. The registration date is used to determine when post-registration maintenance documents are due.

Status Date: Feb. 27, 2018

Publication Date: May 19, 2015

Mark Information

Mark Literal Elements: INVICTA

Standard Character Claim: Yes. The mark consists of standard characters without claim to any particular font style, size, or color.

Mark Drawing Type: 4 - STANDARD CHARACTER MARK

Color(s) Claimed: Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark.

Translation: The English translation of "INVICTA" in the mark is "INVINCIBLE".

Related Properties Information

Goods and Services Privacy - Terms https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=5409408&caseSearchType=US_APPLICATION&caseType=DEFAULT&searchType=statusSearch 1/3 10/6/2020 Status Search SN 5409408 Note: The following symbols indicate that the registrant/owner has amended the goods/services: Brackets [..] indicate deleted goods/services; Double parenthesis ((..)) identify any goods/services not claimed in a Section 15 affidavit of incontestability; and Asterisks *..* identify additional (new) wording in the goods/services. For: Retail, wholesale, and online retail and online wholesale store services featuring, cases for electronic diaries, for photographic apparatus, for compact discs, for DVDs and video cassettes, for laptops, for telephones and mobile telephones, for smartphones, covers for mobile telephones, for smartphones, for tablet computers and for electronic and computer products, cases for calculators, printed matter, including stationery articles, decalcomania transfers, bookmarkers, printed tickets, tag labels, cards, business cards, greetings cards, invitations, stickers, gift voucher, writing or drawing books, diaries, block note pads, posters, calendars, photographs, printed publications, books, periodicals, manuals and handbooks, magazines, newspapers, newsletters, catalogues, brochures and pamphlets, articles for correspondence, including writing papers and envelopes, daily and weekly planners, ring covers, folders for drawing, loose-leaf binders, gift wrapping paper, shopping bags of paper, plastic materials for packaging, rucksacks, backpacks, school bags, shoulder bags for carrying infants, bags, shopping bags, travelling bags and duffel bags for travel, bags and holdalls for sports, handbags, bags for campers, beach bags, backpacks for hiking and climbing, satchels, briefcases, pocket wallets, purses, key cases, hip bags, suitcases, umbrellas, trunks, walking sticks, overnight suitcases, vanity cases, sample bags, garment bags for clothing, wheeled bags, wheeled backpacks and wheeled suitcases, articles of clothing, footwear, active wear, sportswear, namely, trousers, sport suits, shorts, swimwear, bathing suits, bikinis, slips, swimsuit shorts, swimming caps, pareos, bras, ponchos, underwear, namely, body suits, boxers, T-shirts, tank tops, bras, culottes, leotards, shorts, slips, thongs, leather wear and lounge wear, bathrobes, nightdresses, pajamas, apparel of any design and nature made from fabrics of any nature, namely, pants, trousers, work clothing and work overalls, jeans, shorts, jackets, coats, waistcoats, overcoats, raincoats, hosiery, knitwear, sweaters, cardigans, fleece tops and bottoms jumpers, twin sets, woven shirts, dresses, training and track suits, body suits, shirts, plush shirts, polo shirts, nightshirts for men, T-shirts, undershirts, cut and sew tops, dresses, skirts, trousers-skirts, gowns, socks, dressing gowns, bands, balaclavas, scarves, silk scarves, neck and face mask bands, gloves and mittens, ski gloves, headwear, namely, hats, caps, bandanas, basques, visors, wrist bands, belts and ties, footwear, shoes, dress shoes, sneakers, boots, chaps, sandals, slippers, sport and athletic shoes, studded shoes, mountaineering shoes, ski boots and trekking boots, gaiters, heeled shoes, bands for protecting face and ear from cold, skis, gloves for sports, namely, for football, soccer, hockey, rugby, golf, bicycle and motorcycle, bob-sleighs, sports articles, namely, sleighs, roller skates, games, toys, recreational equipment, namely, skateboards, ski and surf boards, parachutes for paragliding, paragliders, hang gliders

International Class(es): 035 - Primary Class U.S Class(es): 100, 101, 102

Class Status: ACTIVE

Basis: 66(a)

Basis Information (Case Level)

Current Owner(s) Information

Owner Name: Invicta S.p.A.

Owner Address: Via Fornacino, 96 I-10040 Leini (TO) ITALY Privacy - Terms https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=5409408&caseSearchType=US_APPLICATION&caseType=DEFAULT&searchType=statusSearch 2/3 10/6/2020 Status Search SN 5409408 Legal Entity Type: società per azioni (spa) State or Country Where ITALY Organized:

Attorney/Correspondence Information

Prosecution History

International Registration Information (Section 66a)

TM Staff and Location Information

Assignment Abstract Of Title Information - Click to Load

Proceedings - Click to Load

Privacy - Terms https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=5409408&caseSearchType=US_APPLICATION&caseType=DEFAULT&searchType=statusSearch 3/3 Reg. No. 5,409,408 Invicta S.p.A. (ITALY società per azioni (spa) ) Via Fornacino, 96 Registered Feb. 27, 2018 I-10040 Leini (to) ITALY

Int. Cl.: 35 CLASS 35: Retail, wholesale, and online retail and online wholesale store services featuring, cases for electronic diaries, for photographic apparatus, for compact discs, for DVDs and Service Mark video cassettes, for laptops, for telephones and mobile telephones, for smartphones, covers for mobile telephones, for smartphones, for tablet computers and for electronic and computer Principal Register products, cases for calculators, printed matter, including stationery articles, decalcomania transfers, bookmarkers, printed tickets, tag labels, cards, business cards, greetings cards, invitations, stickers, gift voucher, writing or drawing books, diaries, block note pads, posters, calendars, photographs, printed publications, books, periodicals, manuals and handbooks, magazines, newspapers, newsletters, catalogues, brochures and pamphlets, articles for correspondence, including writing papers and envelopes, daily and weekly planners, ring covers, folders for drawing, loose-leaf binders, gift wrapping paper, shopping bags of paper, plastic materials for packaging, rucksacks, backpacks, school bags, shoulder bags for carrying infants, bags, shopping bags, travelling bags and duffel bags for travel, bags and holdalls for sports, handbags, bags for campers, beach bags, backpacks for hiking and climbing, satchels, briefcases, pocket wallets, purses, key cases, hip bags, suitcases, umbrellas, trunks, walking sticks, overnight suitcases, vanity cases, sample bags, garment bags for clothing, wheeled bags, wheeled backpacks and wheeled suitcases, articles of clothing, footwear, active wear, sportswear, namely, trousers, sport suits, shorts, swimwear, bathing suits, bikinis, slips, swimsuit shorts, swimming caps, pareos, bras, ponchos, underwear, namely, body suits, boxers, T-shirts, tank tops, bras, culottes, leotards, shorts, slips, thongs, leather wear and lounge wear, bathrobes, nightdresses, pajamas, apparel of any design and nature made from fabrics of any nature, namely, pants, trousers, work clothing and work overalls, jeans, shorts, jackets, coats, waistcoats, overcoats, raincoats, hosiery, knitwear, sweaters, cardigans, fleece tops and bottoms jumpers, twin sets, woven shirts, dresses, training and track suits, body suits, shirts, plush shirts, polo shirts, nightshirts for men, T-shirts, undershirts, cut and sew tops, dresses, skirts, trousers-skirts, gowns, socks, dressing gowns, bands, balaclavas, scarves, silk scarves, neck and face mask bands, gloves and mittens, ski gloves, headwear, namely, hats, caps, bandanas, basques, visors, wrist bands, belts and ties, footwear, shoes, dress shoes, sneakers, boots, chaps, sandals, slippers, sport and athletic shoes, studded shoes, mountaineering shoes, ski boots and trekking boots, gaiters, heeled shoes, bands for protecting face and ear from cold, skis, gloves for sports, namely, for football, soccer, hockey, rugby, golf, bicycle and motorcycle, bob-sleighs, sports articles, namely, sleighs, roller skates, games, toys, recreational equipment, namely, skateboards, ski and surf boards, parachutes for paragliding, paragliders, hang gliders

THE MARK CONSISTS OF STANDARD CHARACTERS WITHOUT CLAIM TO ANY PARTICULAR FONT STYLE, SIZE OR COLOR

OWNER OF U.S. REG. NO. 2109407, 2151279, 3976519

PRIORITY DATE OF 11-14-2013 IS CLAIMED

OWNER OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION 1201001 DATED 12-13-2013, EXPIRES 12-13-2023

The English translation of "INVICTA" in the mark is "INVINCIBLE".

SER. NO. 79-146,181, FILED 12-13-2013

Page: 2 of 3 / RN # 5409408