Office of the President December 2019

Houston Bar Association Judicial Evaluation Results

The quality of the judiciary is of crucial importance to the legal profession and the community. The HBA conducts this Judicial Evaluation Questionnaire in odd-numbered years to obtain its members’ opinions concerning each judge’s performance. To be included on the Evaluation Questionnaire, judges must have actively served on their current court for a minimum of six months as of the date the online questionnaire opened. In election years, the HBA conducts a poll to determine members’ opinions regarding judicial candidates for state and local elections. The results of this Judicial Evaluation Questionnaire are not an opinion or endorsement of any member of the judiciary. TOTAL QUESTIONNAIRES RETURNED: 1,276

Sincerely,

Benny Agosto, Jr. 2019-2020 President Houston Bar Association

PLEASE NOTE: The individual percentages have been rounded to the nearest one-tenth percent. As a result, they may not perfectly sum to 100%. Contents David Hittner...... 44 Kenneth M. Hoyt...... 45 Supreme Court of Texas ...... 5 Lynn N. Hughes ...... 46 Jimmy Blacklock ...... 5 Sim Lake ...... 47 Jeffrey S. Boyd ...... 6 Gray H. Miller ...... 48 J. Brett Busby ...... 7 Lee H. Rosenthal ...... 49 John Phillip Devine ...... 8 Hilda G. Tagle ...... 50 Paul W. Green ...... 9 Ewing Werlein, Jr...... 51 Eva M. Guzman ...... 10 U.S. Magistrate Courts ...... 52 Nathan L. Hecht ...... 11 Peter Bray ...... 52 Debra H. Lehrmann ...... 12 Christina Bryan...... 53 Court of Criminal Appeals ...... 13 Nancy K. Johnson ...... 54 Barbara Hervey ...... 13 Dena Hanovice Palermo ...... 55 Michael E. Keasler ...... 14 Frances H. Stacy ...... 56 Mary Lou Keel ...... 15 Bankruptcy Courts ...... 57 Sharon Keller ...... 16 Marvin Isgur ...... 57 David Newell ...... 17 David R. Jones ...... 58 Bert Richardson ...... 18 Jeffrey P. Norman ...... 59 Michelle Slaughter ...... 19 Eduardo V. Rodriguez ...... 60 Scott Walker ...... 20 Immigration Courts ...... 61 Kevin Yeary ...... 21 Nimmo Bhagat ...... 61 Houston Courts of Appeals ...... 22 Sam Brown IV...... 62 Frances Bourliot ...... 22 Gary E. Endelman...... 63 Tracy Christopher ...... 23 Marcos Gemoets...... 64 Julie Countiss ...... 24 Saul E. Greenstein ...... 65 Kem Thompson Frost ...... 25 Richard A. Jamadar ...... 66 Gordon Goodman ...... 26 Anwer A. Khan ...... 67 Meagan Hassan ...... 27 Lisa Luis ...... 68 Richard Hightower ...... 28 Georgina M. Picos ...... 69 Kevin Jewell ...... 29 Richard D. Walton ...... 70 Peter Kelly ...... 30 Clarease Rankin Yates ...... 71 Evelyn Keyes ...... 31 Civil District Courts ...... 72 Sarah Beth Landau ...... 32 Kyle Carter ...... 72 Russell Lloyd ...... 33 Rabeea Sultan Collier ...... 73 Margaret “Meg” Poissant ...... 34 Dedra Davis ...... 74 Sherry Radack ...... 35 Scot “dolli” Dollinger ...... 75 Charles A. Spain...... 36 Mike Engelhart ...... 76 Ken Wise ...... 37 Michael Gomez ...... 77 Jerry Zimmerer ...... 38 Tanya Garrison ...... 78 U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ursula A. Hall ...... 79 Texas ...... 39 Kristen Brauchle Hawkins ...... 80 Nancy F. Atlas ...... 39 Steven Kirkland ...... 81 Alfred H. Bennett ...... 40 Jaclanel McFarland ...... 82 Keith P. Ellison ...... 41 Beau A. Miller ...... 83 Vanessa Gilmore ...... 42 Daryl L. Moore ...... 84 Andrew S. Hanen...... 43 Elaine H. Palmer ...... 85 Juvenile District Courts ...... 128 Latosha Lewis Payne ...... 86 Michelle Moore ...... 128 Fredericka Phillips ...... 87 Natalia Cokinos Oakes ...... 129 Lauren Reeder ...... 88 Leah Shapiro ...... 130 Donna Roth ...... 89 Probate Courts ...... 131 R. K. Sandill ...... 90 Jason Cox ...... 131 Robert Schaffer ...... 91 James Horwitz ...... 132 Cory Don Sepolio ...... 92 Michael Newman ...... 133 Alexandra Smoots-Thomas ...... 93 Jerry Simoneaux ...... 134 Christine Weems ...... 94 Associate Judges, Family District Courts...... 135 Larry Weiman ...... 95 Bethany Arnold ...... 135 Criminal District Courts ...... 96 Kimberly Baughman ...... 136 Frank Aguilar ...... 96 Charles Collins ...... 137 Abigail Anastasio ...... 97 James Cooper...... 138 Ramona Franklin ...... 98 Jim Evans ...... 139 Greg Glass ...... 99 Katrina M. Griffith ...... 140 Lori Chambers Gray ...... 100 Deborah Patterson ...... 141 Nikita V. Harmon ...... 101 Frank Pierce ...... 142 Josh Hill ...... 102 Yahaira Quezada ...... 143 Kelli Johnson ...... 103 Ryan Salfiti ...... 144 Robert Johnson ...... 104 Associate Judges, Juvenile District Courts ..... 145 DaSean Jones ...... 105 Eric Andell ...... 145 Hazel B. Jones ...... 106 Dena Fisher ...... 146 Danilo Lacayo ...... 107 William Thursland ...... 147 Jason Luong ...... 108 Associate Judges, IV-D Courts ...... 148 Amy Martin ...... 109 David Longoria ...... 148 Chris Morton ...... 110 Conrad Moren...... 149 George Powell ...... 111 Veronica Torrez...... 150 Herb Ritchie ...... 112 Gregory R. Wettman ...... 151 Randy Roll ...... 113 Associate Judges, Probate Courts ...... 152 Chuck Silverman ...... 114 Clarinda Comstock ...... 152 Hilary Unger ...... 115 Amy R. Parsons ...... 153 Brian E. Warren ...... 116 Susie Rowley ...... 154 Family District Courts ...... 117 Ruth Ann Stiles ...... 155 Janice Berg ...... 117 Harris County Civil Courts at Law ...... 156 Linda Marie Dunson ...... 118 George Barnstone ...... 156 Angela L. Graves-Harrington ...... 119 Lesley Briones ...... 157 Sonya L. Heath ...... 120 Jim F. Kovach ...... 158 Tristan H. Longino ...... 121 LaShawn A. Williams ...... 159 Gloria E. Lopez...... 122 Harris County Criminal Courts at Law ...... 160 Julia Maldonado ...... 123 Kelley Andrews ...... 160 Sandra Peake ...... 124 Shannon Baldwin ...... 161 Barbara J. Stalder ...... 125 Ronnisha Bowman ...... 162 Germaine J. Tanner ...... 126 Franklin Bynum ...... 163 Clinton E. Wells, Jr...... 127 Genesis E. Draper ...... 164 Toria J. Finch ...... 165 Joe Stephens ...... 188 David M. Fleischer ...... 166 Richard Vara...... 189 Erica Hughes ...... 167 Jeff Williams ...... 190 Tonya Jones ...... 168 Holly Williamson ...... 191 Darrell Jordan ...... 169 Houston Municipal Courts ...... 192 Raul Rodriguez ...... 170 Mimi Berkowitz ...... 192 Alex Salgado ...... 171 Imelda Castillo ...... 193 David L. Singer ...... 172 Grant H. Coleman ...... 194 Sedrick T. Walker II...... 173 Kim Edwards ...... 195 Lee Harper Wilson ...... 174 Sherilyn Edwards ...... 196 Andrew A. Wright ...... 175 David Fraga ...... 197 Justice of the Peace Courts ...... 176 Kimberly Gamble ...... 198 Lucia Bates ...... 176 Kathy Han...... 199 Jeremy L. Brown ...... 177 Margaret Muñoz Harkins ...... 200 Sharon M. Burney ...... 178 Elaine Jefferson ...... 201 Eric William Carter ...... 179 Cheryl Lee-Collins ...... 202 Jo Ann Delgado ...... 180 Megan McLellan ...... 203 Louie Ditta ...... 181 Lawrence Rousseau ...... 204 Lincoln Goodwin ...... 182 Leigh Saint-Germain ...... 205 Laryssa Korduba ...... 183 Adam Silverman ...... 206 David Patronella ...... 184 Francelia Totty ...... 207 Russ Ridgway ...... 185 MiHoa Vo ...... 208 George Risner ...... 186 Angela D. Rodriguez ...... 187

Supreme Court of Texas Jimmy Blacklock 138 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 32.6% 45 Very Good 17.4% 24 Satisfactory 15.9% 22 Needs Improvement 26.8% 37 No Opinion 7.2% 10 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 31.2% 43 Very Good 13.8% 19 Satisfactory 15.2% 21 Needs Improvement 13.8% 19 No Opinion 26.1% 36 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 34.1% 47 Very Good 11.6% 16 Satisfactory 13.8% 19 Needs Improvement 33.3% 46 No Opinion 7.2% 10 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 36.2% 50 Very Good 14.5% 20 Satisfactory 16.7% 23 Needs Improvement 18.1% 25 No Opinion 14.5% 20 Overall rating Excellent 34.8% 48 Very Good 15.2% 21 Satisfactory 15.2% 21 Needs Improvement 29.0% 40 No Opinion 5.8% 8

Jeffrey S. Boyd 214 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 42.5% 91 Very Good 22.0% 47 Satisfactory 11.7% 25 Needs Improvement 15.4% 33 No Opinion 8.4% 18 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 37.9% 81 Very Good 18.2% 39 Satisfactory 11.2% 24 Needs Improvement 8.9% 19 No Opinion 23.8% 51 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 40.2% 86 Very Good 18.7% 40 Satisfactory 12.1% 26 Needs Improvement 19.6% 42 No Opinion 9.3% 20 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 46.3% 99 Very Good 15.9% 34 Satisfactory 13.6% 29 Needs Improvement 10.3% 22 No Opinion 14.0% 30 Overall rating Excellent 45.8% 98 Very Good 18.7% 40 Satisfactory 13.6% 29 Needs Improvement 15.4% 33 No Opinion 6.5% 14

J. Brett Busby 412 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 68.9% 284 Very Good 12.6% 52 Satisfactory 5.1% 21 Needs Improvement 7.3% 30 No Opinion 6.1% 25 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 60.7% 250 Very Good 11.4% 47 Satisfactory 4.9% 20 Needs Improvement 5.3% 22 No Opinion 17.7% 73 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 63.3% 261 Very Good 15.3% 63 Satisfactory 5.1% 21 Needs Improvement 9.5% 39 No Opinion 6.8% 28 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 72.1% 297 Very Good 10.2% 42 Satisfactory 4.4% 18 Needs Improvement 5.1% 21 No Opinion 8.3% 34 Overall rating Excellent 69.4% 286 Very Good 12.6% 52 Satisfactory 5.3% 22 Needs Improvement 8.5% 35 No Opinion 4.1% 17

John Phillip Devine 265 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 19.6% 52 Very Good 14.0% 37 Satisfactory 20.0% 53 Needs Improvement 38.1% 101 No Opinion 8.3% 22 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 17.4% 46 Very Good 10.2% 27 Satisfactory 21.5% 57 Needs Improvement 27.9% 74 No Opinion 23.0% 61 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 18.9% 50 Very Good 10.2% 27 Satisfactory 19.2% 51 Needs Improvement 40.8% 108 No Opinion 10.9% 29 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 18.9% 50 Very Good 11.7% 31 Satisfactory 20.8% 55 Needs Improvement 30.6% 81 No Opinion 18.1% 48 Overall rating Excellent 18.5% 49 Very Good 13.6% 36 Satisfactory 17.4% 46 Needs Improvement 42.3% 112 No Opinion 8.3% 22

Paul W. Green 179 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 35.2% 63 Very Good 19.0% 34 Satisfactory 16.2% 29 Needs Improvement 21.8% 39 No Opinion 7.8% 14 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 29.1% 52 Very Good 19.6% 35 Satisfactory 17.9% 32 Needs Improvement 16.2% 29 No Opinion 17.3% 31 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 35.2% 63 Very Good 15.1% 27 Satisfactory 17.9% 32 Needs Improvement 21.8% 39 No Opinion 10.1% 18 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 34.1% 61 Very Good 18.4% 33 Satisfactory 15.1% 27 Needs Improvement 17.3% 31 No Opinion 15.1% 27 Overall rating Excellent 35.8% 64 Very Good 17.9% 32 Satisfactory 16.8% 30 Needs Improvement 22.9% 41 No Opinion 6.7% 12

Eva M. Guzman 472 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 58.7% 277 Very Good 16.3% 77 Satisfactory 6.4% 30 Needs Improvement 9.3% 44 No Opinion 9.3% 44 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 53.2% 251 Very Good 13.8% 65 Satisfactory 8.3% 39 Needs Improvement 6.1% 29 No Opinion 18.6% 88 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 54.9% 259 Very Good 16.9% 80 Satisfactory 7.2% 34 Needs Improvement 10.2% 48 No Opinion 10.8% 51 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 61.2% 289 Very Good 12.7% 60 Satisfactory 7.6% 36 Needs Improvement 6.4% 30 No Opinion 12.1% 57 Overall rating Excellent 59.3% 280 Very Good 17.6% 83 Satisfactory 6.8% 32 Needs Improvement 9.5% 45 No Opinion 6.8% 32

Nathan L. Hecht 393 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 53.9% 212 Very Good 15.3% 60 Satisfactory 8.7% 34 Needs Improvement 16.0% 63 No Opinion 6.1% 24 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 45.0% 177 Very Good 16.0% 63 Satisfactory 8.4% 33 Needs Improvement 13.5% 53 No Opinion 17.0% 67 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 46.1% 181 Very Good 13.7% 54 Satisfactory 9.7% 38 Needs Improvement 24.2% 95 No Opinion 6.4% 25 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 53.9% 212 Very Good 14.0% 55 Satisfactory 10.7% 42 Needs Improvement 11.2% 44 No Opinion 10.2% 40 Overall rating Excellent 51.7% 203 Very Good 14.5% 57 Satisfactory 9.7% 38 Needs Improvement 18.8% 74 No Opinion 5.3% 21

Debra H. Lehrmann 244 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 41.0% 100 Very Good 23.0% 56 Satisfactory 15.2% 37 Needs Improvement 13.1% 32 No Opinion 7.8% 19 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 34.4% 84 Very Good 21.7% 53 Satisfactory 12.7% 31 Needs Improvement 11.1% 27 No Opinion 20.1% 49 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 40.6% 99 Very Good 21.3% 52 Satisfactory 12.7% 31 Needs Improvement 14.8% 36 No Opinion 10.7% 26 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 40.2% 98 Very Good 20.9% 51 Satisfactory 16.4% 40 Needs Improvement 10.2% 25 No Opinion 12.3% 30 Overall rating Excellent 42.2% 103 Very Good 23.4% 57 Satisfactory 15.2% 37 Needs Improvement 13.5% 33 No Opinion 5.7% 14

Court of Criminal Appeals Barbara Hervey 57 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 40.4% 23 Very Good 22.8% 13 Satisfactory 7.0% 4 Needs Improvement 24.6% 14 No Opinion 5.3% 3 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 36.8% 21 Very Good 15.8% 9 Satisfactory 5.3% 3 Needs Improvement 24.6% 14 No Opinion 17.5% 10 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 38.6% 22 Very Good 22.8% 13 Satisfactory 5.3% 3 Needs Improvement 28.1% 16 No Opinion 5.3% 3 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 45.6% 26 Very Good 19.3% 11 Satisfactory 3.5% 2 Needs Improvement 26.3% 15 No Opinion 5.3% 3 Overall rating Excellent 43.9% 25 Very Good 21.1% 12 Satisfactory 3.5% 2 Needs Improvement 26.3% 15 No Opinion 5.3% 3

Michael E. Keasler 58 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 43.1% 25 Very Good 17.2% 10 Satisfactory 5.2% 3 Needs Improvement 24.1% 14 No Opinion 10.3% 6 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 36.2% 21 Very Good 17.2% 10 Satisfactory 8.6% 5 Needs Improvement 22.4% 13 No Opinion 15.5% 9 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 36.2% 21 Very Good 20.7% 12 Satisfactory 6.9% 4 Needs Improvement 24.1% 14 No Opinion 12.1% 7 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 39.7% 23 Very Good 17.2% 10 Satisfactory 8.6% 5 Needs Improvement 20.7% 12 No Opinion 13.8% 8 Overall rating Excellent 39.7% 23 Very Good 19.0% 11 Satisfactory 6.9% 4 Needs Improvement 24.1% 14 No Opinion 10.3% 6

Mary Lou Keel 121 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 44.6% 54 Very Good 17.4% 21 Satisfactory 8.3% 10 Needs Improvement 17.4% 21 No Opinion 12.4% 15 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 34.7% 42 Very Good 15.7% 19 Satisfactory 11.6% 14 Needs Improvement 14.0% 17 No Opinion 24.0% 29 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 39.7% 48 Very Good 18.2% 22 Satisfactory 8.3% 10 Needs Improvement 18.2% 22 No Opinion 15.7% 19 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 47.1% 57 Very Good 17.4% 21 Satisfactory 8.3% 10 Needs Improvement 14.9% 18 No Opinion 12.4% 15 Overall rating Excellent 43.0% 52 Very Good 20.7% 25 Satisfactory 7.4% 9 Needs Improvement 17.4% 21 No Opinion 11.6% 14

Sharon Keller 137 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 25.5% 35 Very Good 10.9% 15 Satisfactory 5.1% 7 Needs Improvement 49.6% 68 No Opinion 8.8% 12 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 21.9% 30 Very Good 11.7% 16 Satisfactory 5.8% 8 Needs Improvement 42.3% 58 No Opinion 18.2% 25 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 24.1% 33 Very Good 10.9% 15 Satisfactory 2.9% 4 Needs Improvement 53.3% 73 No Opinion 8.8% 12 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 23.4% 32 Very Good 13.1% 18 Satisfactory 8.0% 11 Needs Improvement 40.1% 55 No Opinion 15.3% 21 Overall rating Excellent 24.8% 34 Very Good 10.2% 14 Satisfactory 2.9% 4 Needs Improvement 53.3% 73 No Opinion 8.8% 12

David Newell 81 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 60.5% 49 Very Good 14.8% 12 Satisfactory 9.9% 8 Needs Improvement 11.1% 9 No Opinion 3.7% 3 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 54.3% 44 Very Good 17.3% 14 Satisfactory 3.7% 3 Needs Improvement 11.1% 9 No Opinion 13.6% 11 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 60.5% 49 Very Good 12.3% 10 Satisfactory 9.9% 8 Needs Improvement 13.6% 11 No Opinion 3.7% 3 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 67.9% 55 Very Good 11.1% 9 Satisfactory 6.2% 5 Needs Improvement 9.9% 8 No Opinion 4.9% 4 Overall rating Excellent 60.5% 49 Very Good 14.8% 12 Satisfactory 8.6% 7 Needs Improvement 12.3% 10 No Opinion 3.7% 3

Bert Richardson 38 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 42.1% 16 Very Good 7.9% 3 Satisfactory 13.2% 5 Needs Improvement 18.4% 7 No Opinion 18.4% 7 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 39.5% 15 Very Good 7.9% 3 Satisfactory 15.8% 6 Needs Improvement 15.8% 6 No Opinion 21.1% 8 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 42.1% 16 Very Good 10.5% 4 Satisfactory 13.2% 5 Needs Improvement 15.8% 6 No Opinion 18.4% 7 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 42.1% 16 Very Good 7.9% 3 Satisfactory 15.8% 6 Needs Improvement 15.8% 6 No Opinion 18.4% 7 Overall rating Excellent 42.1% 16 Very Good 10.5% 4 Satisfactory 10.5% 4 Needs Improvement 18.4% 7 No Opinion 18.4% 7

Michelle Slaughter 82 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 36.6% 30 Very Good 18.3% 15 Satisfactory 9.8% 8 Needs Improvement 22.0% 18 No Opinion 13.4% 11 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 39.0% 32 Very Good 12.2% 10 Satisfactory 9.8% 8 Needs Improvement 18.3% 15 No Opinion 20.7% 17 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 40.2% 33 Very Good 15.9% 13 Satisfactory 8.5% 7 Needs Improvement 22.0% 18 No Opinion 13.4% 11 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 42.7% 35 Very Good 14.6% 12 Satisfactory 9.8% 8 Needs Improvement 19.5% 16 No Opinion 13.4% 11 Overall rating Excellent 42.7% 35 Very Good 14.6% 12 Satisfactory 12.2% 10 Needs Improvement 19.5% 16 No Opinion 11.0% 9

Scott Walker 36 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 25.0% 9 Very Good 19.4% 7 Satisfactory 16.7% 6 Needs Improvement 22.2% 8 No Opinion 16.7% 6 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 22.2% 8 Very Good 25.0% 9 Satisfactory 11.1% 4 Needs Improvement 22.2% 8 No Opinion 19.4% 7 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 25.0% 9 Very Good 22.2% 8 Satisfactory 8.3% 3 Needs Improvement 27.8% 10 No Opinion 16.7% 6 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 22.2% 8 Very Good 22.2% 8 Satisfactory 13.9% 5 Needs Improvement 27.8% 10 No Opinion 13.9% 5 Overall rating Excellent 25.0% 9 Very Good 19.4% 7 Satisfactory 13.9% 5 Needs Improvement 27.8% 10 No Opinion 13.9% 5

Kevin Yeary 40 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 40.0% 16 Very Good 17.5% 7 Satisfactory 10.0% 4 Needs Improvement 25.0% 10 No Opinion 7.5% 3 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 45.0% 18 Very Good 10.0% 4 Satisfactory 12.5% 5 Needs Improvement 22.5% 9 No Opinion 10.0% 4 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 42.5% 17 Very Good 12.5% 5 Satisfactory 12.5% 5 Needs Improvement 27.5% 11 No Opinion 5.0% 2 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 45.0% 18 Very Good 15.0% 6 Satisfactory 10.0% 4 Needs Improvement 17.5% 7 No Opinion 12.5% 5 Overall rating Excellent 42.5% 17 Very Good 17.5% 7 Satisfactory 10.0% 4 Needs Improvement 25.0% 10 No Opinion 5.0% 2

Houston Courts of Appeals Frances Bourliot 145 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 43.4% 63 Very Good 15.2% 22 Satisfactory 13.1% 19 Needs Improvement 20.0% 29 No Opinion 8.3% 12 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 37.9% 55 Very Good 14.5% 21 Satisfactory 11.0% 16 Needs Improvement 17.9% 26 No Opinion 18.6% 27 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 42.8% 62 Very Good 13.8% 20 Satisfactory 10.3% 15 Needs Improvement 22.1% 32 No Opinion 11.0% 16 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 44.1% 64 Very Good 13.1% 19 Satisfactory 11.0% 16 Needs Improvement 18.6% 27 No Opinion 13.1% 19 Overall rating Excellent 43.4% 63 Very Good 15.2% 22 Satisfactory 11.0% 16 Needs Improvement 22.1% 32 No Opinion 8.3% 12

Tracy Christopher 503 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 68.0% 342 Very Good 17.1% 86 Satisfactory 5.4% 27 Needs Improvement 5.4% 27 No Opinion 4.2% 21 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 64.6% 325 Very Good 14.9% 75 Satisfactory 5.8% 29 Needs Improvement 3.8% 19 No Opinion 10.9% 55 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 63.4% 319 Very Good 18.7% 94 Satisfactory 4.6% 23 Needs Improvement 7.8% 39 No Opinion 5.6% 28 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 71.0% 357 Very Good 14.3% 72 Satisfactory 3.8% 19 Needs Improvement 4.4% 22 No Opinion 6.6% 33 Overall rating Excellent 68.6% 345 Very Good 16.5% 83 Satisfactory 4.8% 24 Needs Improvement 6.4% 32 No Opinion 3.8% 19

Julie Countiss 235 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 47.2% 111 Very Good 18.7% 44 Satisfactory 8.9% 21 Needs Improvement 13.6% 32 No Opinion 11.5% 27 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 43.0% 101 Very Good 17.4% 41 Satisfactory 12.3% 29 Needs Improvement 8.1% 19 No Opinion 19.1% 45 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 46.4% 109 Very Good 20.9% 49 Satisfactory 6.8% 16 Needs Improvement 14.9% 35 No Opinion 11.1% 26 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 49.8% 117 Very Good 19.6% 46 Satisfactory 8.5% 20 Needs Improvement 11.1% 26 No Opinion 11.1% 26 Overall rating Excellent 48.1% 113 Very Good 20.9% 49 Satisfactory 9.4% 22 Needs Improvement 13.6% 32 No Opinion 8.1% 19

Kem Thompson Frost 327 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 47.4% 155 Very Good 22.6% 74 Satisfactory 9.2% 30 Needs Improvement 14.4% 47 No Opinion 6.4% 21 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 47.4% 155 Very Good 20.8% 68 Satisfactory 11.3% 37 Needs Improvement 8.0% 26 No Opinion 12.5% 41 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 48.9% 160 Very Good 19.0% 62 Satisfactory 9.8% 32 Needs Improvement 15.6% 51 No Opinion 6.7% 22 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 53.8% 176 Very Good 17.7% 58 Satisfactory 11.3% 37 Needs Improvement 9.2% 30 No Opinion 8.0% 26 Overall rating Excellent 50.5% 165 Very Good 21.7% 71 Satisfactory 10.1% 33 Needs Improvement 14.1% 46 No Opinion 3.7% 12

Gordon Goodman 111 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 22.5% 25 Very Good 14.4% 16 Satisfactory 14.4% 16 Needs Improvement 28.8% 32 No Opinion 19.8% 22 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 20.7% 23 Very Good 15.3% 17 Satisfactory 14.4% 16 Needs Improvement 26.1% 29 No Opinion 23.4% 26 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 19.8% 22 Very Good 16.2% 18 Satisfactory 15.3% 17 Needs Improvement 29.7% 33 No Opinion 18.9% 21 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 22.5% 25 Very Good 14.4% 16 Satisfactory 16.2% 18 Needs Improvement 25.2% 28 No Opinion 21.6% 24 Overall rating Excellent 22.5% 25 Very Good 15.3% 17 Satisfactory 17.1% 19 Needs Improvement 29.7% 33 No Opinion 15.3% 17

Meagan Hassan 174 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 44.3% 77 Very Good 10.9% 19 Satisfactory 8.0% 14 Needs Improvement 25.3% 44 No Opinion 11.5% 20 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 39.1% 68 Very Good 10.3% 18 Satisfactory 9.8% 17 Needs Improvement 20.1% 35 No Opinion 20.7% 36 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 42.0% 73 Very Good 9.8% 17 Satisfactory 7.5% 13 Needs Improvement 27.0% 47 No Opinion 13.8% 24 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 42.5% 74 Very Good 12.6% 22 Satisfactory 10.3% 18 Needs Improvement 20.1% 35 No Opinion 14.4% 25 Overall rating Excellent 44.8% 78 Very Good 11.5% 20 Satisfactory 8.0% 14 Needs Improvement 26.4% 46 No Opinion 9.2% 16

Richard Hightower 214 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 50.0% 107 Very Good 19.6% 42 Satisfactory 7.9% 17 Needs Improvement 7.5% 16 No Opinion 15.0% 32 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 46.7% 100 Very Good 18.7% 40 Satisfactory 6.5% 14 Needs Improvement 8.4% 18 No Opinion 19.6% 42 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 47.7% 102 Very Good 18.2% 39 Satisfactory 7.5% 16 Needs Improvement 9.8% 21 No Opinion 16.8% 36 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 50.0% 107 Very Good 16.8% 36 Satisfactory 7.9% 17 Needs Improvement 6.5% 14 No Opinion 18.7% 40 Overall rating Excellent 51.4% 110 Very Good 20.1% 43 Satisfactory 8.9% 19 Needs Improvement 7.9% 17 No Opinion 11.7% 25

Kevin Jewell 215 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 51.2% 110 Very Good 22.3% 48 Satisfactory 10.2% 22 Needs Improvement 7.4% 16 No Opinion 8.8% 19 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 50.2% 108 Very Good 17.2% 37 Satisfactory 8.4% 18 Needs Improvement 6.0% 13 No Opinion 18.1% 39 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 50.2% 108 Very Good 19.5% 42 Satisfactory 9.3% 20 Needs Improvement 10.7% 23 No Opinion 10.2% 22 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 54.4% 117 Very Good 19.1% 41 Satisfactory 7.9% 17 Needs Improvement 4.7% 10 No Opinion 14.0% 30 Overall rating Excellent 50.2% 108 Very Good 23.7% 51 Satisfactory 10.2% 22 Needs Improvement 7.9% 17 No Opinion 7.9% 17

Peter Kelly 198 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 47.0% 93 Very Good 16.7% 33 Satisfactory 13.6% 27 Needs Improvement 12.6% 25 No Opinion 10.1% 20 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 41.9% 83 Very Good 17.2% 34 Satisfactory 13.6% 27 Needs Improvement 11.1% 22 No Opinion 16.2% 32 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 42.9% 85 Very Good 18.7% 37 Satisfactory 12.1% 24 Needs Improvement 17.2% 34 No Opinion 9.1% 18 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 46.0% 91 Very Good 20.7% 41 Satisfactory 13.6% 27 Needs Improvement 9.6% 19 No Opinion 10.1% 20 Overall rating Excellent 46.5% 92 Very Good 18.7% 37 Satisfactory 14.6% 29 Needs Improvement 13.1% 26 No Opinion 7.1% 14

Evelyn Keyes 263 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 35.7% 94 Very Good 21.3% 56 Satisfactory 12.9% 34 Needs Improvement 19.4% 51 No Opinion 10.6% 28 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 30.4% 80 Very Good 19.8% 52 Satisfactory 14.8% 39 Needs Improvement 17.5% 46 No Opinion 17.5% 46 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 35.4% 93 Very Good 19.0% 50 Satisfactory 12.2% 32 Needs Improvement 22.4% 59 No Opinion 11.0% 29 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 39.9% 105 Very Good 21.3% 56 Satisfactory 11.8% 31 Needs Improvement 12.5% 33 No Opinion 14.4% 38 Overall rating Excellent 36.5% 96 Very Good 21.7% 57 Satisfactory 11.4% 30 Needs Improvement 21.3% 56 No Opinion 9.1% 24

Sarah Beth Landau 163 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 48.5% 79 Very Good 15.3% 25 Satisfactory 8.0% 13 Needs Improvement 12.3% 20 No Opinion 16.0% 26 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 45.4% 74 Very Good 11.7% 19 Satisfactory 7.4% 12 Needs Improvement 11.7% 19 No Opinion 23.9% 39 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 49.7% 81 Very Good 11.0% 18 Satisfactory 6.1% 10 Needs Improvement 15.3% 25 No Opinion 17.8% 29 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 53.4% 87 Very Good 10.4% 17 Satisfactory 8.6% 14 Needs Improvement 11.0% 18 No Opinion 16.6% 27 Overall rating Excellent 49.7% 81 Very Good 12.3% 20 Satisfactory 8.6% 14 Needs Improvement 15.3% 25 No Opinion 14.1% 23

Russell Lloyd 291 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 32.3% 94 Very Good 27.5% 80 Satisfactory 18.2% 53 Needs Improvement 13.1% 38 No Opinion 8.9% 26 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 31.6% 92 Very Good 24.7% 72 Satisfactory 14.8% 43 Needs Improvement 12.0% 35 No Opinion 16.8% 49 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 31.6% 92 Very Good 26.8% 78 Satisfactory 15.8% 46 Needs Improvement 14.4% 42 No Opinion 11.3% 33 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 34.0% 99 Very Good 24.4% 71 Satisfactory 17.2% 50 Needs Improvement 11.7% 34 No Opinion 12.7% 37 Overall rating Excellent 35.1% 102 Very Good 25.4% 74 Satisfactory 18.2% 53 Needs Improvement 13.7% 40 No Opinion 7.6% 22

Margaret “Meg” Poissant 164 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 37.2% 61 Very Good 17.1% 28 Satisfactory 11.0% 18 Needs Improvement 22.6% 37 No Opinion 12.2% 20 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 34.1% 56 Very Good 14.6% 24 Satisfactory 11.6% 19 Needs Improvement 18.9% 31 No Opinion 20.7% 34 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 37.8% 62 Very Good 15.2% 25 Satisfactory 10.4% 17 Needs Improvement 24.4% 40 No Opinion 12.2% 20 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 37.8% 62 Very Good 17.1% 28 Satisfactory 9.8% 16 Needs Improvement 21.3% 35 No Opinion 14.0% 23 Overall rating Excellent 37.2% 61 Very Good 17.1% 28 Satisfactory 10.4% 17 Needs Improvement 25.0% 41 No Opinion 10.4% 17

Sherry Radack 337 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 43.6% 147 Very Good 19.3% 65 Satisfactory 11.0% 37 Needs Improvement 18.7% 63 No Opinion 7.4% 25 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 42.1% 142 Very Good 16.9% 57 Satisfactory 8.6% 29 Needs Improvement 16.6% 56 No Opinion 15.7% 53 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 44.2% 149 Very Good 16.9% 57 Satisfactory 9.5% 32 Needs Improvement 21.1% 71 No Opinion 8.3% 28 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 44.8% 151 Very Good 17.8% 60 Satisfactory 9.5% 32 Needs Improvement 16.6% 56 No Opinion 11.3% 38 Overall rating Excellent 45.4% 153 Very Good 19.9% 67 Satisfactory 9.5% 32 Needs Improvement 20.2% 68 No Opinion 5.0% 17

Charles A. Spain 179 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 35.2% 63 Very Good 15.6% 28 Satisfactory 19.0% 34 Needs Improvement 21.8% 39 No Opinion 8.4% 15 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 33.0% 59 Very Good 15.6% 28 Satisfactory 14.5% 26 Needs Improvement 19.0% 34 No Opinion 17.9% 32 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 36.3% 65 Very Good 15.1% 27 Satisfactory 13.4% 24 Needs Improvement 26.8% 48 No Opinion 8.4% 15 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 37.4% 67 Very Good 14.0% 25 Satisfactory 14.5% 26 Needs Improvement 21.2% 38 No Opinion 12.8% 23 Overall rating Excellent 35.2% 63 Very Good 17.9% 32 Satisfactory 14.0% 25 Needs Improvement 26.3% 47 No Opinion 6.7% 12

Ken Wise 409 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 46.7% 191 Very Good 24.7% 101 Satisfactory 10.8% 44 Needs Improvement 9.3% 38 No Opinion 8.6% 35 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 44.5% 182 Very Good 21.0% 86 Satisfactory 12.0% 49 Needs Improvement 8.3% 34 No Opinion 14.2% 58 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 48.4% 198 Very Good 20.0% 82 Satisfactory 11.2% 46 Needs Improvement 10.5% 43 No Opinion 9.8% 40 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 46.5% 190 Very Good 20.0% 82 Satisfactory 12.7% 52 Needs Improvement 8.3% 34 No Opinion 12.5% 51 Overall rating Excellent 47.4% 194 Very Good 24.0% 98 Satisfactory 12.2% 50 Needs Improvement 10.3% 42 No Opinion 6.1% 25

Jerry Zimmerer 174 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 31.0% 54 Very Good 12.1% 21 Satisfactory 13.8% 24 Needs Improvement 27.6% 48 No Opinion 15.5% 27 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 24.1% 42 Very Good 12.1% 21 Satisfactory 14.4% 25 Needs Improvement 23.6% 41 No Opinion 25.9% 45 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 31.0% 54 Very Good 10.9% 19 Satisfactory 13.8% 24 Needs Improvement 27.0% 47 No Opinion 17.2% 30 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 31.6% 55 Very Good 12.1% 21 Satisfactory 11.5% 20 Needs Improvement 25.3% 44 No Opinion 19.5% 34 Overall rating Excellent 32.8% 57 Very Good 13.8% 24 Satisfactory 12.6% 22 Needs Improvement 28.7% 50 No Opinion 12.1% 21

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas Nancy F. Atlas 418 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 64.1% 268 Very Good 19.1% 80 Excellent 69.6% 291 Satisfactory 4.3% 18 Very Good 16.5% 69 Needs Improvement 2.4% 10 Satisfactory 6.5% 27 No Opinion 10.0% 42 Needs Improvement 2.4% 10 No Opinion 5.0% 21 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 68.7% 287 Very Good 14.6% 61 Excellent 67.0% 280 Satisfactory 4.8% 20 Very Good 17.9% 75 Needs Improvement 1.2% 5 Satisfactory 7.2% 30 No Opinion 10.8% 45 Needs Improvement 1.7% 7 Appropriately uses magistrate No Opinion 6.2% 26 Is courteous and attentive toward judges attorneys and witnesses Excellent 44.7% 187 Very Good 15.6% 65 Excellent 65.8% 275 Satisfactory 5.5% 23 Very Good 17.0% 71 Needs Improvement 2.2% 9 Satisfactory 6.2% 26 No Opinion 32.1% 134 Needs Improvement 3.1% 13 No Opinion 7.9% 33 Overall rating Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 68.2% 285 Very Good 18.2% 76 Excellent 64.4% 269 Satisfactory 6.0% 25 Very Good 16.3% 68 Needs Improvement 2.2% 9 Satisfactory 5.3% 22 No Opinion 5.5% 23 Needs Improvement 3.8% 16

No Opinion 10.3% 43

Alfred H. Bennett 313 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 58.5% 183 Very Good 14.7% 46 Excellent 57.2% 179 Satisfactory 9.9% 31 Very Good 21.1% 66 Needs Improvement 4.5% 14 Satisfactory 8.6% 27 No Opinion 12.5% 39 Needs Improvement 5.1% 16 No Opinion 8.0% 25 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 57.8% 181 Very Good 16.3% 51 Excellent 54.0% 169 Satisfactory 7.3% 23 Very Good 18.8% 59 Needs Improvement 5.4% 17 Satisfactory 8.6% 27 No Opinion 13.1% 41 Needs Improvement 10.9% 34 No Opinion 7.7% 24 Appropriately uses magistrate judges Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 39.0% 122 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 12.1% 38 Excellent 62.6% 196 Satisfactory 5.8% 18 Very Good 16.6% 52 Needs Improvement 3.2% 10 Satisfactory 6.7% 21 No Opinion 39.9% 125 Needs Improvement 3.8% 12 Overall rating No Opinion 10.2% 32 Excellent 60.4% 189 Demonstrates impartiality Very Good 21.4% 67 Excellent 62.9% 197 Satisfactory 6.7% 21 Very Good 14.7% 46 Needs Improvement 6.1% 19 Satisfactory 8.9% 28 No Opinion 5.4% 17

Needs Improvement 3.5% 11 No Opinion 9.9% 31

Keith P. Ellison 384 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 65.1% 250 Very Good 16.1% 62 Excellent 67.2% 258 Satisfactory 6.0% 23 Very Good 15.9% 61 Needs Improvement 3.4% 13 Satisfactory 7.0% 27 No Opinion 9.4% 36 Needs Improvement 4.4% 17 No Opinion 5.5% 21 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 69.3% 266 Very Good 13.3% 51 Excellent 60.7% 233 Satisfactory 3.6% 14 Very Good 19.3% 74 Needs Improvement 2.1% 8 Satisfactory 8.9% 34 No Opinion 11.7% 45 Needs Improvement 4.7% 18 No Opinion 6.5% 25 Appropriately uses magistrate judges Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 43.0% 165 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 10.9% 42 Excellent 74.5% 286 Satisfactory 4.7% 18 Very Good 9.9% 38 Needs Improvement 2.1% 8 Satisfactory 4.2% 16 No Opinion 39.3% 151 Needs Improvement 2.6% 10 Overall rating No Opinion 8.9% 34 Excellent 69.8% 268 Demonstrates impartiality Very Good 15.1% 58 Excellent 67.2% 258 Satisfactory 5.7% 22 Very Good 13.5% 52 Needs Improvement 3.9% 15 Satisfactory 5.7% 22 No Opinion 5.5% 21

Needs Improvement 4.7% 18 No Opinion 8.9% 34

Vanessa Gilmore 352 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 24.7% 87 Very Good 15.9% 56 Excellent 27.0% 95 Satisfactory 24.4% 86 Very Good 18.8% 66 Needs Improvement 22.2% 78 Satisfactory 22.2% 78 No Opinion 12.8% 45 Needs Improvement 23.0% 81 No Opinion 9.1% 32 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 27.6% 97 Very Good 17.0% 60 Excellent 27.0% 95 Satisfactory 21.0% 74 Very Good 19.9% 70 Needs Improvement 20.7% 73 Satisfactory 22.7% 80 No Opinion 13.6% 48 Needs Improvement 20.2% 71 No Opinion 10.2% 36 Appropriately uses magistrate judges Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 20.5% 72 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 11.6% 41 Excellent 21.6% 76 Satisfactory 15.1% 53 Very Good 13.4% 47 Needs Improvement 9.9% 35 Satisfactory 19.9% 70 No Opinion 42.9% 151 Needs Improvement 34.7% 122 Overall rating No Opinion 10.5% 37 Excellent 23.3% 82 Demonstrates impartiality Very Good 19.9% 70 Excellent 24.7% 87 Satisfactory 21.9% 77 Very Good 19.0% 67 Needs Improvement 25.9% 91 Satisfactory 19.6% 69 No Opinion 9.1% 32

Needs Improvement 24.7% 87 No Opinion 11.9% 42

Andrew S. Hanen 234 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 50.4% 118 Very Good 15.0% 35 Excellent 55.6% 130 Satisfactory 7.7% 18 Very Good 15.0% 35 Needs Improvement 5.6% 13 Satisfactory 6.4% 15 No Opinion 21.4% 50 Needs Improvement 12.4% 29 No Opinion 10.7% 25 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 53.4% 125 Very Good 16.7% 39 Excellent 53.4% 125 Satisfactory 4.7% 11 Very Good 17.1% 40 Needs Improvement 5.6% 13 Satisfactory 7.3% 17 No Opinion 19.7% 46 Needs Improvement 6.8% 16 No Opinion 15.4% 36 Appropriately uses magistrate judges Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 42.3% 99 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 9.8% 23 Excellent 54.7% 128 Satisfactory 6.0% 14 Very Good 14.1% 33 Needs Improvement 5.1% 12 Satisfactory 5.1% 12 No Opinion 36.8% 86 Needs Improvement 7.3% 17 Overall rating No Opinion 18.8% 44 Excellent 56.0% 131 Demonstrates impartiality Very Good 15.0% 35 Excellent 51.7% 121 Satisfactory 7.3% 17 Very Good 12.0% 28 Needs Improvement 10.3% 24 Satisfactory 6.4% 15 No Opinion 11.5% 27

Needs Improvement 12.8% 30 No Opinion 17.1% 40

David Hittner 405 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 40.0% 162 Very Good 20.7% 84 Excellent 46.7% 189 Satisfactory 14.1% 57 Very Good 22.5% 91 Needs Improvement 11.1% 45 Satisfactory 13.3% 54 No Opinion 14.1% 57 Needs Improvement 9.6% 39 No Opinion 7.9% 32 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 47.7% 193 Very Good 22.0% 89 Excellent 49.9% 202 Satisfactory 11.1% 45 Very Good 21.2% 86 Needs Improvement 7.7% 31 Satisfactory 11.1% 45 No Opinion 11.6% 47 Needs Improvement 8.1% 33 No Opinion 9.6% 39 Appropriately uses magistrate judges Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 29.4% 119 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 13.1% 53 Excellent 27.7% 112 Satisfactory 9.4% 38 Very Good 19.5% 79 Needs Improvement 5.7% 23 Satisfactory 18.3% 74 No Opinion 42.5% 172 Needs Improvement 24.2% 98 Overall rating No Opinion 10.4% 42 Excellent 39.8% 161 Demonstrates impartiality Very Good 24.2% 98 Excellent 37.5% 152 Satisfactory 15.8% 64 Very Good 21.7% 88 Needs Improvement 12.3% 50 Satisfactory 16.0% 65 No Opinion 7.9% 32

Needs Improvement 14.1% 57 No Opinion 10.6% 43

Kenneth M. Hoyt 310 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 31.3% 97 Very Good 23.2% 72 Excellent 30.0% 93 Satisfactory 20.0% 62 Very Good 24.8% 77 Needs Improvement 12.6% 39 Satisfactory 20.3% 63 No Opinion 12.9% 40 Needs Improvement 16.1% 50 No Opinion 8.7% 27 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 32.6% 101 Very Good 21.9% 68 Excellent 29.0% 90 Satisfactory 20.0% 62 Very Good 23.5% 73 Needs Improvement 11.6% 36 Satisfactory 22.9% 71 No Opinion 13.9% 43 Needs Improvement 14.5% 45 No Opinion 10.0% 31 Appropriately uses magistrate judges Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 24.2% 75 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 15.5% 48 Excellent 44.2% 137 Satisfactory 12.6% 39 Very Good 21.6% 67 Needs Improvement 7.1% 22 Satisfactory 11.9% 37 No Opinion 40.6% 126 Needs Improvement 10.3% 32 Overall rating No Opinion 11.9% 37 Excellent 31.0% 96 Demonstrates impartiality Very Good 26.8% 83 Excellent 36.5% 113 Satisfactory 20.6% 64 Very Good 23.2% 72 Needs Improvement 13.2% 41 Satisfactory 15.8% 49 No Opinion 8.4% 26

Needs Improvement 13.5% 42 No Opinion 11.0% 34

Lynn N. Hughes 458 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 27.1% 124 Very Good 14.2% 65 Excellent 26.2% 120 Satisfactory 17.2% 79 Very Good 15.5% 71 Needs Improvement 31.9% 146 Satisfactory 17.2% 79 No Opinion 9.6% 44 Needs Improvement 36.2% 166 No Opinion 4.8% 22 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 29.5% 135 Very Good 17.7% 81 Excellent 31.9% 146 Satisfactory 19.2% 88 Very Good 15.3% 70 Needs Improvement 23.8% 109 Satisfactory 15.1% 69 No Opinion 9.8% 45 Needs Improvement 31.2% 143 No Opinion 6.6% 30 Appropriately uses magistrate judges Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 17.7% 81 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 9.4% 43 Excellent 19.9% 91 Satisfactory 12.2% 56 Very Good 14.8% 68 Needs Improvement 13.8% 63 Satisfactory 16.6% 76 No Opinion 46.9% 215 Needs Improvement 41.0% 188 Overall rating No Opinion 7.6% 35 Excellent 23.8% 109 Demonstrates impartiality Very Good 17.5% 80 Excellent 21.2% 97 Satisfactory 15.1% 69 Very Good 13.8% 63 Needs Improvement 38.0% 174 Satisfactory 16.4% 75 No Opinion 5.7% 26

Needs Improvement 42.1% 193 No Opinion 6.6% 30

Sim Lake 357 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 61.6% 220 Very Good 17.6% 63 Excellent 68.3% 244 Satisfactory 4.2% 15 Very Good 16.2% 58 Needs Improvement 2.2% 8 Satisfactory 3.9% 14 No Opinion 14.3% 51 Needs Improvement 2.2% 8 No Opinion 9.2% 33 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 69.5% 248 Very Good 12.0% 43 Excellent 67.2% 240 Satisfactory 3.4% 12 Very Good 17.1% 61 Needs Improvement 1.7% 6 Satisfactory 3.6% 13 No Opinion 13.4% 48 Needs Improvement 2.2% 8 No Opinion 9.8% 35 Appropriately uses magistrate judges Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 47.6% 170 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 9.8% 35 Excellent 63.3% 226 Satisfactory 4.5% 16 Very Good 16.0% 57 Needs Improvement 1.1% 4 Satisfactory 6.4% 23 No Opinion 37.0% 132 Needs Improvement 2.5% 9 Overall rating No Opinion 11.8% 42 Excellent 68.6% 245 Demonstrates impartiality Very Good 16.5% 59 Excellent 62.5% 223 Satisfactory 4.5% 16 Very Good 18.2% 65 Needs Improvement 2.0% 7 Satisfactory 4.2% 15 No Opinion 8.4% 30

Needs Improvement 2.2% 8 No Opinion 12.9% 46

Gray H. Miller 297 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 57.2% 170 Very Good 18.5% 55 Excellent 60.9% 181 Satisfactory 5.7% 17 Very Good 20.5% 61 Needs Improvement 3.0% 9 Satisfactory 5.4% 16 No Opinion 15.5% 46 Needs Improvement 2.0% 6 No Opinion 11.1% 33 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 58.6% 174 Very Good 19.2% 57 Excellent 56.9% 169 Satisfactory 4.7% 14 Very Good 21.5% 64 Needs Improvement 1.7% 5 Satisfactory 6.4% 19 No Opinion 15.8% 47 Needs Improvement 3.4% 10 No Opinion 11.8% 35 Appropriately uses magistrate judges Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 45.5% 135 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 12.1% 36 Excellent 63.6% 189 Satisfactory 3.7% 11 Very Good 15.5% 46 Needs Improvement 1.3% 4 Satisfactory 4.7% 14 No Opinion 37.4% 111 Needs Improvement 1.0% 3 Overall rating No Opinion 15.2% 45 Excellent 59.6% 177 Demonstrates impartiality Very Good 20.5% 61 Excellent 61.6% 183 Satisfactory 5.7% 17 Very Good 17.8% 53 Needs Improvement 2.7% 8 Satisfactory 4.7% 14 No Opinion 11.4% 34

Needs Improvement 2.0% 6 No Opinion 13.8% 41

Lee H. Rosenthal 520 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 71.0% 369 Very Good 12.1% 63 Excellent 76.5% 398 Satisfactory 4.8% 25 Very Good 9.4% 49 Needs Improvement 1.9% 10 Satisfactory 3.3% 17 No Opinion 10.2% 53 Needs Improvement 4.4% 23 No Opinion 6.3% 33 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 77.5% 403 Very Good 8.1% 42 Excellent 75.6% 393 Satisfactory 1.9% 10 Very Good 11.5% 60 Needs Improvement 1.5% 8 Satisfactory 4.0% 21 No Opinion 11.0% 57 Needs Improvement 1.5% 8 No Opinion 7.3% 38 Appropriately uses magistrate judges Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 49.6% 258 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 7.9% 41 Excellent 73.5% 382 Satisfactory 4.0% 21 Very Good 10.8% 56 Needs Improvement 1.5% 8 Satisfactory 3.3% 17 No Opinion 36.9% 192 Needs Improvement 2.7% 14 Overall rating No Opinion 9.8% 51 Excellent 76.2% 396 Demonstrates impartiality Very Good 10.2% 53 Excellent 71.7% 373 Satisfactory 3.5% 18 Very Good 9.8% 51 Needs Improvement 4.0% 21 Satisfactory 4.2% 22 No Opinion 6.2% 32

Needs Improvement 5.4% 28 No Opinion 8.8% 46

Hilda G. Tagle 51 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 21.6% 11 Very Good 15.7% 8 Excellent 21.6% 11 Satisfactory 15.7% 8 Very Good 11.8% 6 Needs Improvement 5.9% 3 Satisfactory 15.7% 8 No Opinion 41.2% 21 Needs Improvement 13.7% 7 No Opinion 37.3% 19 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 21.6% 11 Very Good 13.7% 7 Excellent 19.6% 10 Satisfactory 17.6% 9 Very Good 13.7% 7 Needs Improvement 9.8% 5 Satisfactory 11.8% 6 No Opinion 37.3% 19 Needs Improvement 13.7% 7 No Opinion 41.2% 21 Appropriately uses magistrate judges Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 19.6% 10 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 11.8% 6 Excellent 19.6% 10 Satisfactory 9.8% 5 Very Good 15.7% 8 Needs Improvement 9.8% 5 Satisfactory 9.8% 5 No Opinion 49.0% 25 Needs Improvement 13.7% 7 Overall rating No Opinion 41.2% 21 Excellent 21.6% 11 Demonstrates impartiality Very Good 15.7% 8 Excellent 21.6% 11 Satisfactory 17.6% 9 Very Good 13.7% 7 Needs Improvement 11.8% 6 Satisfactory 13.7% 7 No Opinion 33.3% 17 Needs Improvement 11.8% 6 No Opinion 39.2% 20

Ewing Werlein, Jr. 268 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 46.6% 125 Very Good 22.8% 61 Excellent 52.6% 141 Satisfactory 12.3% 33 Very Good 20.9% 56 Needs Improvement 3.0% 8 Satisfactory 10.8% 29 No Opinion 15.3% 41 Needs Improvement 4.5% 12 No Opinion 11.2% 30 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 50.7% 136 Very Good 18.7% 50 Excellent 50.7% 136 Satisfactory 10.8% 29 Very Good 23.5% 63 Needs Improvement 3.4% 9 Satisfactory 10.1% 27 No Opinion 16.4% 44 Needs Improvement 4.1% 11 No Opinion 11.6% 31 Appropriately uses magistrate judges Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 34.0% 91 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 13.1% 35 Excellent 53.4% 143 Satisfactory 7.8% 21 Very Good 18.3% 49 Needs Improvement 1.9% 5 Satisfactory 10.4% 28 No Opinion 43.3% 116 Needs Improvement 3.7% 10 Overall rating No Opinion 14.2% 38 Excellent 48.5% 130 Demonstrates impartiality Very Good 23.5% 63 Excellent 48.9% 131 Satisfactory 13.1% 35 Very Good 19.4% 52 Needs Improvement 4.1% 11 Satisfactory 10.8% 29 No Opinion 10.8% 29

Needs Improvement 6.0% 16 No Opinion 14.9% 40 U.S. Magistrate Courts Peter Bray 78 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 55.1% 43 Very Good 17.9% 14 Excellent 51.3% 40 Satisfactory 6.4% 5 Very Good 20.5% 16 Needs Improvement 1.3% 1 Satisfactory 5.1% 4 No Opinion 19.2% 15 Needs Improvement 1.3% 1 No Opinion 21.8% 17 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 52.6% 41 Very Good 20.5% 16 Excellent 52.6% 41 Satisfactory 2.6% 2 Very Good 17.9% 14 Needs Improvement 1.3% 1 Satisfactory 6.4% 5 No Opinion 23.1% 18 Needs Improvement 2.6% 2 No Opinion 20.5% 16 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 52.6% 41 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 21.8% 17 Excellent 53.8% 42 Satisfactory 6.4% 5 Very Good 17.9% 14 Needs Improvement 1.3% 1 Satisfactory 6.4% 5 No Opinion 17.9% 14

Needs Improvement 2.6% 2 No Opinion 19.2% 15

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 51.3% 40 Very Good 20.5% 16 Satisfactory 5.1% 4 Needs Improvement 1.3% 1

No Opinion 21.8% 17

Christina Bryan 77 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 63.6% 49 Very Good 10.4% 8 Excellent 63.6% 49 Satisfactory 2.6% 2 Very Good 13.0% 10 Needs Improvement 2.6% 2 Satisfactory 2.6% 2 No Opinion 20.8% 16 Needs Improvement 2.6% 2 No Opinion 18.2% 14 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 68.8% 53 Very Good 7.8% 6 Excellent 61.0% 47 Satisfactory 2.6% 2 Very Good 13.0% 10 Needs Improvement 2.6% 2 Satisfactory 2.6% 2 No Opinion 18.2% 14 Needs Improvement 2.6% 2 No Opinion 20.8% 16 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 67.5% 52 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 10.4% 8 Excellent 66.2% 51 Satisfactory 2.6% 2 Very Good 9.1% 7 Needs Improvement 2.6% 2 Satisfactory 2.6% 2 No Opinion 16.9% 13

Needs Improvement 1.3% 1 No Opinion 20.8% 16

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 64.9% 50 Very Good 7.8% 6 Satisfactory 2.6% 2 Needs Improvement 2.6% 2

No Opinion 22.1% 17

Nancy K. Johnson 243 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 49.0% 119 Very Good 21.4% 52 Excellent 53.9% 131 Satisfactory 9.5% 23 Very Good 24.3% 59 Needs Improvement 4.1% 10 Satisfactory 7.0% 17 No Opinion 16.0% 39 Needs Improvement 5.3% 13 No Opinion 9.5% 23 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 54.7% 133 Very Good 21.4% 52 Excellent 51.0% 124 Satisfactory 6.2% 15 Very Good 24.7% 60 Needs Improvement 4.5% 11 Satisfactory 9.5% 23 No Opinion 13.2% 32 Needs Improvement 3.3% 8 No Opinion 11.5% 28 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 52.3% 127 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 25.5% 62 Excellent 52.3% 127 Satisfactory 6.2% 15 Very Good 19.3% 47 Needs Improvement 5.8% 14 Satisfactory 8.6% 21 No Opinion 10.3% 25

Needs Improvement 7.0% 17 No Opinion 12.8% 31

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 51.0% 124 Very Good 21.4% 52 Satisfactory 5.3% 13 Needs Improvement 7.8% 19

No Opinion 14.4% 35

Dena Hanovice Palermo 127 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 48.8% 62 Very Good 15.0% 19 Excellent 48.0% 61 Satisfactory 7.1% 9 Very Good 18.1% 23 Needs Improvement 3.1% 4 Satisfactory 7.9% 10 No Opinion 26.0% 33 Needs Improvement 4.7% 6 No Opinion 21.3% 27 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 54.3% 69 Very Good 15.7% 20 Excellent 48.8% 62 Satisfactory 6.3% 8 Very Good 18.9% 24 Needs Improvement 3.1% 4 Satisfactory 9.4% 12 No Opinion 20.5% 26 Needs Improvement 1.6% 2 No Opinion 21.3% 27 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 48.8% 62 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 19.7% 25 Excellent 54.3% 69 Satisfactory 5.5% 7 Very Good 13.4% 17 Needs Improvement 3.9% 5 Satisfactory 4.7% 6 No Opinion 22.0% 28

Needs Improvement 3.9% 5 No Opinion 23.6% 30

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 51.2% 65 Very Good 15.7% 20 Satisfactory 6.3% 8 Needs Improvement 4.7% 6

No Opinion 22.0% 28

Frances H. Stacy 233 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 48.1% 112 Very Good 25.8% 60 Excellent 50.2% 117 Satisfactory 9.0% 21 Very Good 26.2% 61 Needs Improvement 3.9% 9 Satisfactory 7.3% 17 No Opinion 13.3% 31 Needs Improvement 4.7% 11 No Opinion 11.6% 27 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 50.2% 117 Very Good 24.9% 58 Excellent 48.1% 112 Satisfactory 7.7% 18 Very Good 26.2% 61 Needs Improvement 3.0% 7 Satisfactory 9.9% 23 No Opinion 14.2% 33 Needs Improvement 3.9% 9 No Opinion 12.0% 28 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 50.6% 118 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 26.6% 62 Excellent 56.7% 132 Satisfactory 8.6% 20 Very Good 21.5% 50 Needs Improvement 3.0% 7 Satisfactory 4.3% 10 No Opinion 11.2% 26

Needs Improvement 3.4% 8 No Opinion 14.2% 33

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 52.4% 122 Very Good 22.3% 52 Satisfactory 6.4% 15 Needs Improvement 5.2% 12 No Opinion 13.7% 32

Bankruptcy Courts Marvin Isgur 201 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 51.2% 103 Very Good 21.9% 44 Excellent 63.2% 127 Satisfactory 10.0% 20 Very Good 18.4% 37 Needs Improvement 4.5% 9 Satisfactory 3.5% 7 No Opinion 12.4% 25 Needs Improvement 5.0% 10 No Opinion 10.0% 20 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 68.2% 137 Very Good 13.9% 28 Excellent 64.2% 129 Satisfactory 2.5% 5 Very Good 15.9% 32 Needs Improvement 3.0% 6 Satisfactory 5.5% 11 No Opinion 12.4% 25 Needs Improvement 4.0% 8 No Opinion 10.4% 21 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 61.7% 124 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 18.9% 38 Excellent 59.2% 119 Satisfactory 4.0% 8 Very Good 14.4% 29 Needs Improvement 6.5% 13 Satisfactory 8.0% 16 No Opinion 9.0% 18 Needs Improvement 6.5% 13 No Opinion 11.9% 24

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 54.2% 109 Very Good 18.9% 38

Satisfactory 5.0% 10 Needs Improvement 6.5% 13 No Opinion 15.4% 31

David R. Jones 139 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 46.0% 64 Very Good 24.5% 34 Excellent 48.9% 68 Satisfactory 7.9% 11 Very Good 22.3% 31 Needs Improvement 8.6% 12 Satisfactory 7.9% 11 No Opinion 12.9% 18 Needs Improvement 10.1% 14 No Opinion 10.8% 15 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 59.0% 82 Very Good 15.1% 21 Excellent 52.5% 73 Satisfactory 9.4% 13 Very Good 21.6% 30 Needs Improvement 5.0% 7 Satisfactory 5.0% 7 No Opinion 11.5% 16 Needs Improvement 8.6% 12 No Opinion 12.2% 17 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 48.2% 67 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 23.7% 33 Excellent 43.9% 61 Satisfactory 6.5% 9 Very Good 20.9% 29 Needs Improvement 12.2% 17 Satisfactory 7.2% 10 No Opinion 9.4% 13 Needs Improvement 15.8% 22 No Opinion 12.2% 17

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 44.6% 62 Very Good 18.7% 26 Satisfactory 10.8% 15 Needs Improvement 12.9% 18

No Opinion 12.9% 18

Jeffrey P. Norman 58 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 44.8% 26 Very Good 13.8% 8 Excellent 37.9% 22 Satisfactory 12.1% 7 Very Good 20.7% 12 Needs Improvement 5.2% 3 Satisfactory 10.3% 6 No Opinion 24.1% 14 Needs Improvement 8.6% 5 No Opinion 22.4% 13 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 50.0% 29 Very Good 12.1% 7 Excellent 43.1% 25 Satisfactory 8.6% 5 Very Good 17.2% 10 Needs Improvement 6.9% 4 Satisfactory 13.8% 8 No Opinion 22.4% 13 Needs Improvement 1.7% 1 No Opinion 24.1% 14 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 46.6% 27 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 10.3% 6 Excellent 41.4% 24 Satisfactory 15.5% 9 Very Good 22.4% 13 Needs Improvement 6.9% 4 Satisfactory 6.9% 4 No Opinion 20.7% 12 Needs Improvement 6.9% 4 No Opinion 22.4% 13

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 48.3% 28 Very Good 12.1% 7 Satisfactory 12.1% 7 Needs Improvement 5.2% 3

No Opinion 22.4% 13

Eduardo V. Rodriguez 58 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 39.7% 23 Very Good 17.2% 10 Excellent 34.5% 20 Satisfactory 12.1% 7 Very Good 17.2% 10 Needs Improvement 6.9% 4 Satisfactory 17.2% 10 No Opinion 24.1% 14 Needs Improvement 8.6% 5 No Opinion 22.4% 13 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 44.8% 26 Very Good 10.3% 6 Excellent 34.5% 20 Satisfactory 17.2% 10 Very Good 19.0% 11 Needs Improvement 3.4% 2 Satisfactory 17.2% 10 No Opinion 24.1% 14 Needs Improvement 5.2% 3 No Opinion 24.1% 14 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 36.2% 21 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 19.0% 11 Excellent 44.8% 26 Satisfactory 15.5% 9 Very Good 15.5% 9 Needs Improvement 6.9% 4 Satisfactory 8.6% 5 No Opinion 22.4% 13 Needs Improvement 6.9% 4 No Opinion 24.1% 14

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 44.8% 26 Very Good 13.8% 8 Satisfactory 10.3% 6 Needs Improvement 6.9% 4 No Opinion 24.1% 14

Immigration Courts Nimmo Bhagat 11 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 36.4% 4 Very Good 9.1% 1 Excellent 36.4% 4 Satisfactory 9.1% 1 Very Good 18.2% 2 Needs Improvement 9.1% 1 Satisfactory 9.1% 1 No Opinion 36.4% 4 Needs Improvement 9.1% 1 No Opinion 27.3% 3 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 36.4% 4 Very Good 9.1% 1 Excellent 18.2% 2 Satisfactory 9.1% 1 Very Good 27.3% 3 Needs Improvement 9.1% 1 Satisfactory 18.2% 2 No Opinion 36.4% 4 Needs Improvement 9.1% 1 No Opinion 27.3% 3 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 36.4% 4 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 9.1% 1 Excellent 36.4% 4 Satisfactory 9.1% 1 Very Good 18.2% 2 Needs Improvement 9.1% 1 Satisfactory 9.1% 1 No Opinion 36.4% 4

Needs Improvement 9.1% 1 No Opinion 27.3% 3

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 27.3% 3 Very Good 9.1% 1 Satisfactory 18.2% 2 Needs Improvement 9.1% 1 No Opinion 36.4% 4

Sam Brown IV 8 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 0.0% 0 Very Good 37.5% 3 Excellent 12.5% 1 Satisfactory 12.5% 1 Very Good 37.5% 3 Needs Improvement 12.5% 1 Satisfactory 12.5% 1 No Opinion 37.5% 3 Needs Improvement 12.5% 1 No Opinion 25.0% 2 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 12.5% 1 Very Good 25.0% 2 Excellent 12.5% 1 Satisfactory 12.5% 1 Very Good 25.0% 2 Needs Improvement 0.0% 0 Satisfactory 25.0% 2 No Opinion 50.0% 4 Needs Improvement 12.5% 1 No Opinion 25.0% 2 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 25.0% 2 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 37.5% 3 Excellent 25.0% 2 Satisfactory 12.5% 1 Very Good 25.0% 2 Needs Improvement 12.5% 1 Satisfactory 12.5% 1 No Opinion 12.5% 1

Needs Improvement 12.5% 1 No Opinion 25.0% 2

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 12.5% 1 Very Good 37.5% 3 Satisfactory 12.5% 1 Needs Improvement 12.5% 1 No Opinion 25.0% 2

Gary E. Endelman 10 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 10.0% 1 Very Good 20.0% 2 Excellent 20.0% 2 Satisfactory 10.0% 1 Very Good 10.0% 1 Needs Improvement 20.0% 2 Satisfactory 10.0% 1 No Opinion 40.0% 4 Needs Improvement 20.0% 2 No Opinion 40.0% 4 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 10.0% 1 Very Good 20.0% 2 Excellent 10.0% 1 Satisfactory 10.0% 1 Very Good 20.0% 2 Needs Improvement 20.0% 2 Satisfactory 10.0% 1 No Opinion 40.0% 4 Needs Improvement 20.0% 2 No Opinion 40.0% 4 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 10.0% 1 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 20.0% 2 Excellent 10.0% 1 Satisfactory 10.0% 1 Very Good 10.0% 1 Needs Improvement 20.0% 2 Satisfactory 20.0% 2 No Opinion 40.0% 4

Needs Improvement 20.0% 2 No Opinion 40.0% 4

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 10.0% 1 Very Good 20.0% 2 Satisfactory 10.0% 1 Needs Improvement 20.0% 2

No Opinion 40.0% 4

Marcos Gemoets 9 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 22.2% 2 Very Good 0.0% 0 Excellent 22.2% 2 Satisfactory 11.1% 1 Very Good 0.0% 0 Needs Improvement 22.2% 2 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 No Opinion 44.4% 4 Needs Improvement 33.3% 3 No Opinion 44.4% 4 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 22.2% 2 Very Good 0.0% 0 Excellent 22.2% 2 Satisfactory 11.1% 1 Very Good 0.0% 0 Needs Improvement 11.1% 1 Satisfactory 11.1% 1 No Opinion 55.6% 5 Needs Improvement 11.1% 1 No Opinion 55.6% 5 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 22.2% 2 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 11.1% 1 Excellent 22.2% 2 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Very Good 0.0% 0 Needs Improvement 33.3% 3 Satisfactory 11.1% 1 No Opinion 33.3% 3

Needs Improvement 22.2% 2 No Opinion 44.4% 4

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 22.2% 2 Very Good 0.0% 0 Satisfactory 11.1% 1 Needs Improvement 22.2% 2 No Opinion 44.4% 4

Saul E. Greenstein 5 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 40.0% 2 Very Good 20.0% 1 Excellent 40.0% 2 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Very Good 20.0% 1 Needs Improvement 20.0% 1 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 No Opinion 20.0% 1 Needs Improvement 40.0% 2 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 40.0% 2 Excellent 20.0% 1 Very Good 20.0% 1 Very Good 20.0% 1 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Needs Improvement 20.0% 1 Needs Improvement 40.0% 2 No Opinion 20.0% 1 No Opinion 20.0% 1 Is courteous and attentive toward Overall rating attorneys and witnesses Excellent 20.0% 1 Excellent 40.0% 2 Very Good 40.0% 2 Very Good 20.0% 1 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Needs Improvement 40.0% 2

Needs Improvement 40.0% 2 Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 20.0% 1 Very Good 20.0% 1 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Needs Improvement 40.0% 2 No Opinion 20.0% 1

Richard A. Jamadar 8 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 25.0% 2 Very Good 25.0% 2 Excellent 12.5% 1 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Very Good 25.0% 2 Needs Improvement 12.5% 1 Satisfactory 12.5% 1 No Opinion 37.5% 3 Needs Improvement 12.5% 1 No Opinion 37.5% 3 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 12.5% 1 Very Good 37.5% 3 Excellent 12.5% 1 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Very Good 25.0% 2 Needs Improvement 12.5% 1 Satisfactory 12.5% 1 No Opinion 37.5% 3 Needs Improvement 12.5% 1 No Opinion 37.5% 3 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 25.0% 2 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 25.0% 2 Excellent 50.0% 4 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Very Good 0.0% 0 Needs Improvement 12.5% 1 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 No Opinion 37.5% 3

Needs Improvement 12.5% 1 No Opinion 37.5% 3

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 37.5% 3 Very Good 12.5% 1 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Needs Improvement 12.5% 1 No Opinion 37.5% 3

Anwer A. Khan 5 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 0.0% 0 Very Good 20.0% 1 Excellent 0.0% 0 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Very Good 20.0% 1 Needs Improvement 40.0% 2 Satisfactory 20.0% 1 No Opinion 40.0% 2 Needs Improvement 20.0% 1 No Opinion 40.0% 2 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 0.0% 0 Very Good 20.0% 1 Excellent 0.0% 0 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Very Good 20.0% 1 Needs Improvement 20.0% 1 Satisfactory 20.0% 1 No Opinion 60.0% 3 Needs Improvement 20.0% 1 No Opinion 40.0% 2 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 0.0% 0 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 20.0% 1 Excellent 0.0% 0 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Very Good 40.0% 2 Needs Improvement 40.0% 2 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 No Opinion 40.0% 2

Needs Improvement 20.0% 1 No Opinion 40.0% 2

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 0.0% 0 Very Good 20.0% 1 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Needs Improvement 40.0% 2 No Opinion 40.0% 2

Lisa Luis 7 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 28.6% 2 Very Good 14.3% 1 Excellent 28.6% 2 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Very Good 0.0% 0 Needs Improvement 14.3% 1 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 No Opinion 42.9% 3 Needs Improvement 28.6% 2 No Opinion 42.9% 3 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 14.3% 1 Very Good 28.6% 2 Excellent 28.6% 2 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Very Good 14.3% 1 Needs Improvement 14.3% 1 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 No Opinion 42.9% 3 Needs Improvement 14.3% 1 No Opinion 42.9% 3 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 14.3% 1 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 14.3% 1 Excellent 14.3% 1 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Very Good 0.0% 0 Needs Improvement 28.6% 2 Satisfactory 14.3% 1 No Opinion 42.9% 3

Needs Improvement 14.3% 1 No Opinion 57.1% 4

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 14.3% 1 Very Good 0.0% 0 Satisfactory 14.3% 1 Needs Improvement 28.6% 2 No Opinion 42.9% 3

Georgina M. Picos 6 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 33.3% 2 Very Good 16.7% 1 Excellent 33.3% 2 Satisfactory 16.7% 1 Very Good 33.3% 2 Needs Improvement 16.7% 1 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 No Opinion 16.7% 1 Needs Improvement 33.3% 2 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 33.3% 2 Excellent 33.3% 2 Very Good 0.0% 0 Very Good 33.3% 2 Satisfactory 16.7% 1 Satisfactory 16.7% 1 Needs Improvement 33.3% 2 Needs Improvement 16.7% 1 No Opinion 16.7% 1 Is courteous and attentive toward attorneys and witnesses Overall rating Excellent 50.0% 3 Excellent 33.3% 2 Very Good 0.0% 0 Very Good 16.7% 1 Satisfactory 16.7% 1 Satisfactory 16.7% 1 Needs Improvement 33.3% 2 Needs Improvement 33.3% 2

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 33.3% 2 Very Good 16.7% 1 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Needs Improvement 33.3% 2 No Opinion 16.7% 1

Richard D. Walton 2 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 0.0% 0 Very Good 0.0% 0 Excellent 0.0% 0 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Very Good 0.0% 0 Needs Improvement 50.0% 1 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 No Opinion 50.0% 1 Needs Improvement 50.0% 1 No Opinion 50.0% 1 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 0.0% 0 Very Good 0.0% 0 Excellent 0.0% 0 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Very Good 0.0% 0 Needs Improvement 50.0% 1 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 No Opinion 50.0% 1 Needs Improvement 50.0% 1 No Opinion 50.0% 1 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 0.0% 0 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 0.0% 0 Excellent 0.0% 0 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Very Good 0.0% 0 Needs Improvement 50.0% 1 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 No Opinion 50.0% 1

Needs Improvement 50.0% 1 No Opinion 50.0% 1

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 0.0% 0 Very Good 0.0% 0 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Needs Improvement 50.0% 1 No Opinion 50.0% 1

Clarease Rankin Yates 13 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 30.8% 4 Very Good 15.4% 2 Excellent 23.1% 3 Satisfactory 15.4% 2 Very Good 30.8% 4 Needs Improvement 23.1% 3 Satisfactory 7.7% 1 No Opinion 15.4% 2 Needs Improvement 23.1% 3 No Opinion 15.4% 2 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 23.1% 3 Very Good 7.7% 1 Excellent 30.8% 4 Satisfactory 30.8% 4 Very Good 7.7% 1 Needs Improvement 23.1% 3 Satisfactory 15.4% 2 No Opinion 15.4% 2 Needs Improvement 23.1% 3 No Opinion 23.1% 3 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 23.1% 3 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 30.8% 4 Excellent 30.8% 4 Satisfactory 7.7% 1 Very Good 7.7% 1 Needs Improvement 23.1% 3 Satisfactory 30.8% 4 No Opinion 15.4% 2

Needs Improvement 15.4% 2 No Opinion 15.4% 2

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 38.5% 5 Very Good 7.7% 1 Satisfactory 15.4% 2 Needs Improvement 15.4% 2 No Opinion 23.1% 3

Civil District Courts Kyle Carter 473 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 32.8% 155 Very Good 18.2% 86 Excellent 31.7% 150 Satisfactory 15.6% 74 Very Good 17.1% 81 Needs Improvement 22.8% 108 Satisfactory 13.5% 64 No Opinion 10.6% 50 Needs Improvement 30.4% 144 No Opinion 7.2% 34 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 34.7% 164 Very Good 15.4% 73 Excellent 31.9% 151 Satisfactory 16.9% 80 Very Good 17.1% 81 Needs Improvement 24.3% 115 Satisfactory 16.5% 78 No Opinion 8.7% 41 Needs Improvement 28.3% 134 No Opinion 6.1% 29 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 32.8% 155 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 19.2% 91 Excellent 42.1% 199 Satisfactory 13.1% 62 Very Good 18.8% 89 Needs Improvement 29.6% 140 Satisfactory 14.2% 67 No Opinion 5.3% 25

Needs Improvement 17.5% 83 No Opinion 7.4% 35

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 34.7% 164 Very Good 14.0% 66 Satisfactory 12.9% 61 Needs Improvement 29.6% 140 No Opinion 8.9% 42

Rabeea Sultan Collier 207 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 36.7% 76 Very Good 15.0% 31 Excellent 35.7% 74 Satisfactory 12.6% 26 Very Good 15.9% 33 Needs Improvement 20.3% 42 Satisfactory 14.0% 29 No Opinion 15.5% 32 Needs Improvement 23.2% 48 No Opinion 11.1% 23 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 39.6% 82 Very Good 16.4% 34 Excellent 35.3% 73 Satisfactory 10.1% 21 Very Good 17.4% 36 Needs Improvement 19.8% 41 Satisfactory 13.5% 28 No Opinion 14.0% 29 Needs Improvement 20.8% 43 No Opinion 13.0% 27 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 37.7% 78 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 18.4% 38 Excellent 40.1% 83 Satisfactory 12.6% 26 Very Good 16.9% 35 Needs Improvement 21.7% 45 Satisfactory 11.1% 23 No Opinion 9.7% 20

Needs Improvement 19.8% 41 No Opinion 12.1% 25

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 34.8% 72 Very Good 14.0% 29 Satisfactory 13.0% 27 Needs Improvement 23.2% 48 No Opinion 15.0% 31

Dedra Davis 210 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 17.1% 36 Very Good 9.5% 20 Excellent 16.2% 34 Satisfactory 8.6% 18 Very Good 9.0% 19 Needs Improvement 55.7% 117 Satisfactory 10.5% 22 No Opinion 9.0% 19 Needs Improvement 57.6% 121 No Opinion 6.7% 14 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 18.6% 39 Very Good 5.2% 11 Excellent 16.7% 35 Satisfactory 13.8% 29 Very Good 8.6% 18 Needs Improvement 53.8% 113 Satisfactory 13.3% 28 No Opinion 8.6% 18 Needs Improvement 52.4% 110 No Opinion 9.0% 19 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 18.1% 38 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 7.6% 16 Excellent 21.9% 46 Satisfactory 8.1% 17 Very Good 12.4% 26 Needs Improvement 59.5% 125 Satisfactory 13.8% 29 No Opinion 6.7% 14

Needs Improvement 43.8% 92 No Opinion 8.1% 17

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 18.6% 39 Very Good 8.6% 18 Satisfactory 13.8% 29 Needs Improvement 47.1% 99 No Opinion 11.9% 25

Scot “dolli” Dollinger 243 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 42.4% 103 Very Good 20.6% 50 Excellent 43.2% 105 Satisfactory 13.2% 32 Very Good 17.7% 43 Needs Improvement 10.7% 26 Satisfactory 13.6% 33 No Opinion 13.2% 32 Needs Improvement 14.4% 35 No Opinion 11.1% 27 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 45.7% 111 Very Good 16.5% 40 Excellent 44.9% 109 Satisfactory 14.0% 34 Very Good 17.7% 43 Needs Improvement 10.7% 26 Satisfactory 11.5% 28 No Opinion 13.2% 32 Needs Improvement 12.8% 31 No Opinion 13.2% 32 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 46.1% 112 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 18.1% 44 Excellent 51.4% 125 Satisfactory 15.6% 38 Very Good 16.5% 40 Needs Improvement 12.8% 31 Satisfactory 12.3% 30 No Opinion 7.4% 18

Needs Improvement 8.6% 21 No Opinion 11.1% 27

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 44.9% 109 Very Good 14.4% 35 Satisfactory 16.0% 39 Needs Improvement 12.8% 31 No Opinion 11.9% 29

Mike Engelhart 547 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 55.0% 301 Very Good 21.4% 117 Excellent 53.4% 292 Satisfactory 10.2% 56 Very Good 24.5% 134 Needs Improvement 5.3% 29 Satisfactory 9.9% 54 No Opinion 8.0% 44 Needs Improvement 7.3% 40 No Opinion 4.9% 27 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 59.2% 324 Very Good 20.5% 112 Excellent 53.0% 290 Satisfactory 8.6% 47 Very Good 25.4% 139 Needs Improvement 5.5% 30 Satisfactory 9.9% 54 No Opinion 6.2% 34 Needs Improvement 5.1% 28 No Opinion 6.6% 36 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 55.2% 302 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 24.5% 134 Excellent 60.5% 331 Satisfactory 9.7% 53 Very Good 19.4% 106 Needs Improvement 6.2% 34 Satisfactory 9.3% 51 No Opinion 4.4% 24

Needs Improvement 5.3% 29 No Opinion 5.5% 30

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 50.8% 278 Very Good 22.1% 121 Satisfactory 10.2% 56 Needs Improvement 8.6% 47 No Opinion 8.2% 45

Michael Gomez 401 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 35.4% 142 Very Good 21.9% 88 Excellent 35.9% 144 Satisfactory 16.0% 64 Very Good 22.2% 89 Needs Improvement 16.0% 64 Satisfactory 17.7% 71 No Opinion 10.7% 43 Needs Improvement 17.7% 71 No Opinion 6.5% 26 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 38.4% 154 Very Good 20.7% 83 Excellent 35.2% 141 Satisfactory 15.5% 62 Very Good 21.4% 86 Needs Improvement 16.2% 65 Satisfactory 18.0% 72 No Opinion 9.2% 37 Needs Improvement 18.7% 75 No Opinion 6.7% 27 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 37.2% 149 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 22.4% 90 Excellent 52.4% 210 Satisfactory 17.0% 68 Very Good 17.5% 70 Needs Improvement 18.7% 75 Satisfactory 13.0% 52 No Opinion 4.7% 19

Needs Improvement 9.2% 37 No Opinion 8.0% 32

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 39.4% 158 Very Good 19.2% 77 Satisfactory 15.2% 61 Needs Improvement 17.0% 68 No Opinion 9.2% 37

Tanya Garrison 319 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 45.1% 144 Very Good 18.8% 60 Excellent 49.8% 159 Satisfactory 10.0% 32 Very Good 14.7% 47 Needs Improvement 11.6% 37 Satisfactory 8.2% 26 No Opinion 14.4% 46 Needs Improvement 15.4% 49 No Opinion 11.9% 38 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 51.7% 165 Very Good 16.3% 52 Excellent 48.0% 153 Satisfactory 6.9% 22 Very Good 16.6% 53 Needs Improvement 11.3% 36 Satisfactory 10.0% 32 No Opinion 13.8% 44 Needs Improvement 10.7% 34 No Opinion 14.7% 47 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 49.5% 158 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 16.3% 52 Excellent 50.8% 162 Satisfactory 10.0% 32 Very Good 16.9% 54 Needs Improvement 13.5% 43 Satisfactory 6.6% 21 No Opinion 10.7% 34

Needs Improvement 12.2% 39 No Opinion 13.5% 43

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 48.0% 153 Very Good 15.4% 49 Satisfactory 7.5% 24 Needs Improvement 14.7% 47 No Opinion 14.4% 46

Ursula A. Hall 339 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 11.5% 39 Very Good 5.9% 20 Excellent 12.1% 41 Satisfactory 8.8% 30 Very Good 8.6% 29 Needs Improvement 62.5% 212 Satisfactory 10.6% 36 No Opinion 11.2% 38 Needs Improvement 62.2% 211 No Opinion 6.5% 22 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 14.2% 48 Very Good 5.6% 19 Excellent 12.1% 41 Satisfactory 12.4% 42 Very Good 4.7% 16 Needs Improvement 58.7% 199 Satisfactory 6.2% 21 No Opinion 9.1% 31 Needs Improvement 71.1% 241 No Opinion 5.9% 20 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 11.8% 40 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 5.3% 18 Excellent 20.6% 70 Satisfactory 10.9% 37 Very Good 15.3% 52 Needs Improvement 65.5% 222 Satisfactory 12.1% 41 No Opinion 6.5% 22

Needs Improvement 43.1% 146 No Opinion 8.8% 30

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 16.8% 57 Very Good 8.0% 27 Satisfactory 14.5% 49 Needs Improvement 49.6% 168 No Opinion 11.2% 38

Kristen Brauchle Hawkins 305 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 44.3% 135 Very Good 18.0% 55 Excellent 44.6% 136 Satisfactory 15.1% 46 Very Good 20.0% 61 Needs Improvement 13.1% 40 Satisfactory 11.8% 36 No Opinion 9.5% 29 Needs Improvement 18.0% 55 No Opinion 5.6% 17 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 48.5% 148 Very Good 16.7% 51 Excellent 47.5% 145 Satisfactory 14.1% 43 Very Good 18.7% 57 Needs Improvement 10.5% 32 Satisfactory 13.1% 40 No Opinion 10.2% 31 Needs Improvement 12.1% 37 No Opinion 8.5% 26 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 45.9% 140 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 20.0% 61 Excellent 49.5% 151 Satisfactory 14.4% 44 Very Good 18.4% 56 Needs Improvement 15.4% 47 Satisfactory 11.1% 34 No Opinion 4.3% 13

Needs Improvement 13.4% 41 No Opinion 7.5% 23

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 44.3% 135 Very Good 15.7% 48 Satisfactory 12.8% 39 Needs Improvement 18.0% 55 No Opinion 9.2% 28

Steven Kirkland 453 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 40.8% 185 Very Good 21.9% 99 Excellent 40.2% 182 Satisfactory 14.8% 67 Very Good 23.0% 104 Needs Improvement 12.1% 55 Satisfactory 15.7% 71 No Opinion 10.4% 47 Needs Improvement 13.9% 63 No Opinion 7.3% 33 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 43.7% 198 Very Good 21.0% 95 Excellent 42.8% 194 Satisfactory 13.7% 62 Very Good 23.0% 104 Needs Improvement 13.0% 59 Satisfactory 13.9% 63 No Opinion 8.6% 39 Needs Improvement 11.9% 54 No Opinion 8.4% 38 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 39.7% 180 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 23.6% 107 Excellent 41.9% 190 Satisfactory 14.1% 64 Very Good 21.4% 97 Needs Improvement 15.5% 70 Satisfactory 11.5% 52 No Opinion 7.1% 32

Needs Improvement 16.1% 73 No Opinion 9.1% 41

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 42.4% 192 Very Good 18.5% 84 Satisfactory 13.7% 62 Needs Improvement 16.8% 76 No Opinion 8.6% 39

Jaclanel McFarland 418 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 27.5% 115 Very Good 12.2% 51 Excellent 28.2% 118 Satisfactory 17.0% 71 Very Good 16.0% 67 Needs Improvement 33.5% 140 Satisfactory 16.3% 68 No Opinion 9.8% 41 Needs Improvement 32.5% 136 No Opinion 6.9% 29 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 27.3% 114 Very Good 14.4% 60 Excellent 25.6% 107 Satisfactory 17.0% 71 Very Good 16.0% 67 Needs Improvement 32.1% 134 Satisfactory 16.5% 69 No Opinion 9.3% 39 Needs Improvement 34.0% 142 No Opinion 7.9% 33 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 29.2% 122 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 14.6% 61 Excellent 40.2% 168 Satisfactory 16.5% 69 Very Good 21.3% 89 Needs Improvement 33.7% 141 Satisfactory 12.4% 52 No Opinion 6.0% 25

Needs Improvement 18.2% 76 No Opinion 7.9% 33

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 30.6% 128 Very Good 14.6% 61 Satisfactory 15.1% 63 Needs Improvement 30.4% 127 No Opinion 9.3% 39

Beau A. Miller 256 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 49.6% 127 Very Good 16.4% 42 Excellent 49.6% 127 Satisfactory 10.2% 26 Very Good 16.0% 41 Needs Improvement 10.2% 26 Satisfactory 9.0% 23 No Opinion 13.7% 35 Needs Improvement 14.1% 36 No Opinion 11.3% 29 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 52.3% 134 Very Good 15.2% 39 Excellent 49.2% 126 Satisfactory 8.2% 21 Very Good 18.4% 47 Needs Improvement 10.2% 26 Satisfactory 9.8% 25 No Opinion 14.1% 36 Needs Improvement 10.2% 26 No Opinion 12.5% 32 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 49.2% 126 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 18.0% 46 Excellent 53.9% 138 Satisfactory 7.8% 20 Very Good 14.8% 38 Needs Improvement 12.9% 33 Satisfactory 7.0% 18 No Opinion 12.1% 31

Needs Improvement 9.4% 24 No Opinion 14.8% 38

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 52.3% 134 Very Good 13.3% 34 Satisfactory 6.3% 16 Needs Improvement 14.1% 36 No Opinion 14.1% 36

Daryl L. Moore 382 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 67.8% 259 Very Good 12.8% 49 Excellent 69.4% 265 Satisfactory 5.2% 20 Very Good 14.1% 54 Needs Improvement 5.2% 20 Satisfactory 3.7% 14 No Opinion 8.9% 34 Needs Improvement 6.0% 23 No Opinion 6.8% 26 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 72.0% 275 Very Good 11.8% 45 Excellent 65.7% 251 Satisfactory 2.9% 11 Very Good 15.4% 59 Needs Improvement 5.2% 20 Satisfactory 4.7% 18 No Opinion 8.1% 31 Needs Improvement 6.0% 23 No Opinion 8.1% 31 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 67.8% 259 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 15.2% 58 Excellent 72.5% 277 Satisfactory 4.7% 18 Very Good 12.8% 49 Needs Improvement 6.0% 23 Satisfactory 2.4% 9 No Opinion 6.3% 24

Needs Improvement 5.0% 19 No Opinion 7.3% 28

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 65.7% 251 Very Good 14.4% 55 Satisfactory 5.0% 19 Needs Improvement 7.1% 27 No Opinion 7.9% 30

Elaine H. Palmer 328 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 18.6% 61 Very Good 16.8% 55 Excellent 18.6% 61 Satisfactory 18.3% 60 Very Good 14.9% 49 Needs Improvement 32.0% 105 Satisfactory 15.5% 51 No Opinion 14.3% 47 Needs Improvement 40.5% 133 No Opinion 10.4% 34 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 20.1% 66 Very Good 14.6% 48 Excellent 19.8% 65 Satisfactory 18.9% 62 Very Good 14.6% 48 Needs Improvement 34.5% 113 Satisfactory 18.9% 62 No Opinion 11.9% 39 Needs Improvement 35.1% 115 No Opinion 11.6% 38 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 19.2% 63 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 15.9% 52 Excellent 29.9% 98 Satisfactory 16.5% 54 Very Good 22.3% 73 Needs Improvement 39.9% 131 Satisfactory 13.4% 44 No Opinion 8.5% 28

Needs Improvement 23.2% 76 No Opinion 11.3% 37

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 20.7% 68 Very Good 14.9% 49 Satisfactory 17.7% 58 Needs Improvement 32.6% 107 No Opinion 14.0% 46

Latosha Lewis Payne 201 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 33.3% 67 Very Good 15.4% 31 Excellent 36.3% 73 Satisfactory 10.9% 22 Very Good 14.4% 29 Needs Improvement 23.9% 48 Satisfactory 10.0% 20 No Opinion 16.4% 33 Needs Improvement 24.9% 50 No Opinion 14.4% 29 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 35.8% 72 Very Good 13.9% 28 Excellent 35.8% 72 Satisfactory 9.0% 18 Very Good 14.9% 30 Needs Improvement 24.4% 49 Satisfactory 10.9% 22 No Opinion 16.9% 34 Needs Improvement 22.4% 45 No Opinion 15.9% 32 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 36.8% 74 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 14.9% 30 Excellent 36.8% 74 Satisfactory 10.0% 20 Very Good 17.4% 35 Needs Improvement 26.9% 54 Satisfactory 11.4% 23 No Opinion 11.4% 23

Needs Improvement 17.4% 35 No Opinion 16.9% 34

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 35.3% 71 Very Good 13.4% 27 Satisfactory 9.5% 19 Needs Improvement 22.4% 45 No Opinion 19.4% 39

Fredericka Phillips 278 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 24.8% 69 Very Good 14.7% 41 Excellent 23.7% 66 Satisfactory 11.2% 31 Very Good 14.0% 39 Needs Improvement 35.3% 98 Satisfactory 11.5% 32 No Opinion 14.0% 39 Needs Improvement 39.9% 111 No Opinion 10.8% 30 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 25.2% 70 Very Good 13.3% 37 Excellent 23.7% 66 Satisfactory 14.0% 39 Very Good 16.2% 45 Needs Improvement 35.3% 98 Satisfactory 11.5% 32 No Opinion 12.2% 34 Needs Improvement 36.7% 102 No Opinion 11.9% 33 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 24.8% 69 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 15.5% 43 Excellent 31.3% 87 Satisfactory 11.5% 32 Very Good 16.2% 45 Needs Improvement 39.2% 109 Satisfactory 10.8% 30 No Opinion 9.0% 25

Needs Improvement 28.1% 78 No Opinion 13.7% 38

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 27.0% 75 Very Good 12.6% 35 Satisfactory 8.6% 24 Needs Improvement 36.7% 102 No Opinion 15.1% 42

Lauren Reeder 269 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 54.6% 147 Very Good 20.1% 54 Excellent 53.5% 144 Satisfactory 4.8% 13 Very Good 17.1% 46 Needs Improvement 6.7% 18 Satisfactory 6.3% 17 No Opinion 13.8% 37 Needs Improvement 11.9% 32 No Opinion 11.2% 30 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 57.2% 154 Very Good 18.2% 49 Excellent 52.8% 142 Satisfactory 4.5% 12 Very Good 20.8% 56 Needs Improvement 6.7% 18 Satisfactory 5.2% 14 No Opinion 13.4% 36 Needs Improvement 7.4% 20 No Opinion 13.8% 37 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 55.4% 149 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 18.6% 50 Excellent 58.4% 157 Satisfactory 8.6% 23 Very Good 19.0% 51 Needs Improvement 8.6% 23 Satisfactory 3.7% 10 No Opinion 8.9% 24

Needs Improvement 5.9% 16 No Opinion 13.0% 35

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 53.9% 145 Very Good 15.6% 42 Satisfactory 6.3% 17 Needs Improvement 10.4% 28 No Opinion 13.8% 37

Donna Roth 309 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 54.0% 167 Very Good 15.5% 48 Excellent 52.4% 162 Satisfactory 9.1% 28 Very Good 15.9% 49 Needs Improvement 11.7% 36 Satisfactory 7.8% 24 No Opinion 9.7% 30 Needs Improvement 16.5% 51 No Opinion 7.4% 23 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 56.6% 175 Very Good 12.6% 39 Excellent 56.0% 173 Satisfactory 8.4% 26 Very Good 15.9% 49 Needs Improvement 12.3% 38 Satisfactory 8.1% 25 No Opinion 10.0% 31 Needs Improvement 11.3% 35 No Opinion 8.7% 27 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 54.7% 169 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 16.8% 52 Excellent 53.4% 165 Satisfactory 7.8% 24 Very Good 15.5% 48 Needs Improvement 14.2% 44 Satisfactory 7.8% 24 No Opinion 6.5% 20

Needs Improvement 14.6% 45 No Opinion 8.7% 27

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 51.1% 158 Very Good 12.0% 37 Satisfactory 9.7% 30 Needs Improvement 17.5% 54 No Opinion 9.7% 30

R. K. Sandill 514 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 38.7% 199 Very Good 16.7% 86 Excellent 36.8% 189 Satisfactory 11.5% 59 Very Good 20.2% 104 Needs Improvement 21.6% 111 Satisfactory 11.5% 59 No Opinion 11.5% 59 Needs Improvement 24.5% 126 No Opinion 7.0% 36 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 39.7% 204 Very Good 18.1% 93 Excellent 38.7% 199 Satisfactory 12.1% 62 Very Good 19.8% 102 Needs Improvement 21.0% 108 Satisfactory 14.4% 74 No Opinion 9.1% 47 Needs Improvement 18.3% 94 No Opinion 8.8% 45 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 37.9% 195 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 18.7% 96 Excellent 37.9% 195 Satisfactory 12.6% 65 Very Good 16.1% 83 Needs Improvement 24.7% 127 Satisfactory 11.3% 58 No Opinion 6.0% 31

Needs Improvement 25.9% 133 No Opinion 8.8% 45

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 34.4% 177 Very Good 17.5% 90 Satisfactory 10.5% 54 Needs Improvement 27.6% 142 No Opinion 9.9% 51

Robert Schaffer 483 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 61.7% 298 Very Good 18.2% 88 Excellent 63.8% 308 Satisfactory 7.0% 34 Very Good 18.2% 88 Needs Improvement 5.0% 24 Satisfactory 6.2% 30 No Opinion 8.1% 39 Needs Improvement 6.0% 29 No Opinion 5.8% 28 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 66.0% 319 Very Good 16.4% 79 Excellent 62.3% 301 Satisfactory 4.8% 23 Very Good 18.0% 87 Needs Improvement 5.0% 24 Satisfactory 6.6% 32 No Opinion 7.9% 38 Needs Improvement 6.2% 30 No Opinion 6.8% 33 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 62.5% 302 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 20.1% 97 Excellent 62.5% 302 Satisfactory 7.5% 36 Very Good 16.1% 78 Needs Improvement 5.0% 24 Satisfactory 7.2% 35 No Opinion 5.0% 24

Needs Improvement 5.4% 26 No Opinion 8.7% 42

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 59.4% 287 Very Good 17.4% 84 Satisfactory 7.2% 35 Needs Improvement 6.4% 31 No Opinion 9.5% 46

Cory Don Sepolio 199 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 54.3% 108 Very Good 18.1% 36 Excellent 53.3% 106 Satisfactory 8.5% 17 Very Good 19.1% 38 Needs Improvement 8.5% 17 Satisfactory 7.5% 15 No Opinion 10.6% 21 Needs Improvement 10.1% 20 No Opinion 10.1% 20 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 60.3% 120 Very Good 16.1% 32 Excellent 56.3% 112 Satisfactory 5.5% 11 Very Good 18.6% 37 Needs Improvement 9.0% 18 Satisfactory 7.0% 14 No Opinion 9.0% 18 Needs Improvement 8.0% 16 No Opinion 10.1% 20 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 56.8% 113 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 19.1% 38 Excellent 56.8% 113 Satisfactory 9.5% 19 Very Good 17.1% 34 Needs Improvement 9.0% 18 Satisfactory 9.5% 19 No Opinion 5.5% 11

Needs Improvement 8.0% 16 No Opinion 8.5% 17

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 53.3% 106 Very Good 15.6% 31 Satisfactory 10.6% 21 Needs Improvement 10.1% 20 No Opinion 10.6% 21

Alexandra Smoots-Thomas 405 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 19.0% 77 Very Good 12.8% 52 Excellent 18.5% 75 Satisfactory 16.0% 65 Very Good 15.1% 61 Needs Improvement 40.7% 165 Satisfactory 13.1% 53 No Opinion 11.4% 46 Needs Improvement 46.2% 187 No Opinion 7.2% 29 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 19.5% 79 Very Good 12.8% 52 Excellent 20.0% 81 Satisfactory 15.3% 62 Very Good 13.1% 53 Needs Improvement 42.7% 173 Satisfactory 16.5% 67 No Opinion 9.6% 39 Needs Improvement 42.0% 170 No Opinion 8.4% 34 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 18.3% 74 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 14.6% 59 Excellent 21.7% 88 Satisfactory 13.8% 56 Very Good 12.8% 52 Needs Improvement 46.9% 190 Satisfactory 16.8% 68 No Opinion 6.4% 26

Needs Improvement 38.0% 154 No Opinion 10.6% 43

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 19.3% 78 Very Good 12.1% 49 Satisfactory 14.3% 58 Needs Improvement 43.2% 175 No Opinion 11.1% 45

Christine Weems 205 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 48.3% 99 Very Good 17.6% 36 Excellent 49.3% 101 Satisfactory 8.8% 18 Very Good 19.0% 39 Needs Improvement 12.7% 26 Satisfactory 7.8% 16 No Opinion 12.7% 26 Needs Improvement 13.2% 27 No Opinion 10.7% 22 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 51.2% 105 Very Good 16.6% 34 Excellent 50.2% 103 Satisfactory 9.3% 19 Very Good 15.6% 32 Needs Improvement 11.2% 23 Satisfactory 10.2% 21 No Opinion 11.7% 24 Needs Improvement 12.7% 26 No Opinion 11.2% 23 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 50.2% 103 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 19.5% 40 Excellent 53.2% 109 Satisfactory 9.3% 19 Very Good 16.1% 33 Needs Improvement 13.2% 27 Satisfactory 6.3% 13 No Opinion 7.8% 16

Needs Improvement 11.2% 23 No Opinion 13.2% 27

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 46.8% 96 Very Good 17.1% 35 Satisfactory 11.7% 24 Needs Improvement 12.2% 25 No Opinion 12.2% 25

Larry Weiman 441 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 33.3% 147 Very Good 18.4% 81 Excellent 34.7% 153 Satisfactory 20.0% 88 Very Good 22.9% 101 Needs Improvement 17.2% 76 Satisfactory 16.6% 73 No Opinion 11.1% 49 Needs Improvement 17.2% 76 No Opinion 8.6% 38 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 37.6% 166 Very Good 22.9% 101 Excellent 34.5% 152 Satisfactory 15.9% 70 Very Good 20.4% 90 Needs Improvement 12.2% 54 Satisfactory 17.9% 79 No Opinion 11.3% 50 Needs Improvement 18.1% 80 No Opinion 9.1% 40 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 35.6% 157 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 23.6% 104 Excellent 48.3% 213 Satisfactory 18.1% 80 Very Good 19.0% 84 Needs Improvement 16.3% 72 Satisfactory 13.4% 59 No Opinion 6.3% 28

Needs Improvement 9.8% 43 No Opinion 9.5% 42

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 37.6% 166 Very Good 19.0% 84 Satisfactory 14.7% 65 Needs Improvement 17.9% 79 No Opinion 10.7% 47

Criminal District Courts Frank Aguilar 88 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 21.6% 19 Very Good 23.9% 21 Excellent 22.7% 20 Satisfactory 9.1% 8 Very Good 22.7% 20 Needs Improvement 23.9% 21 Satisfactory 10.2% 9 No Opinion 21.6% 19 Needs Improvement 23.9% 21 No Opinion 20.5% 18 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 23.9% 21 Very Good 18.2% 16 Excellent 21.6% 19 Satisfactory 10.2% 9 Very Good 23.9% 21 Needs Improvement 21.6% 19 Satisfactory 10.2% 9 No Opinion 26.1% 23 Needs Improvement 22.7% 20 No Opinion 21.6% 19 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 25.0% 22 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 20.5% 18 Excellent 22.7% 20 Satisfactory 11.4% 10 Very Good 28.4% 25 Needs Improvement 25.0% 22 Satisfactory 8.0% 7 No Opinion 18.2% 16

Needs Improvement 20.5% 18 No Opinion 20.5% 18

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 22.7% 20 Very Good 22.7% 20 Satisfactory 12.5% 11 Needs Improvement 21.6% 19

No Opinion 20.5% 18

Abigail Anastasio 94 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 27.7% 26 Very Good 22.3% 21 Excellent 31.9% 30 Satisfactory 13.8% 13 Very Good 17.0% 16 Needs Improvement 19.1% 18 Satisfactory 13.8% 13 No Opinion 17.0% 16 Needs Improvement 26.6% 25 No Opinion 10.6% 10 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 34.0% 32 Very Good 16.0% 15 Excellent 33.0% 31 Satisfactory 13.8% 13 Very Good 14.9% 14 Needs Improvement 19.1% 18 Satisfactory 17.0% 16 No Opinion 17.0% 16 Needs Improvement 19.1% 18 No Opinion 16.0% 15 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 30.9% 29 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 19.1% 18 Excellent 38.3% 36 Satisfactory 12.8% 12 Very Good 20.2% 19 Needs Improvement 26.6% 25 Satisfactory 10.6% 10 No Opinion 10.6% 10

Needs Improvement 19.1% 18 No Opinion 11.7% 11

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 33.0% 31 Very Good 14.9% 14 Satisfactory 12.8% 12 Needs Improvement 27.7% 26

No Opinion 11.7% 11

Ramona Franklin 94 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 20.2% 19 Very Good 14.9% 14 Excellent 19.1% 18 Satisfactory 16.0% 15 Very Good 19.1% 18 Needs Improvement 38.3% 36 Satisfactory 21.3% 20 No Opinion 10.6% 10 Needs Improvement 27.7% 26 No Opinion 12.8% 12 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 22.3% 21 Very Good 17.0% 16 Excellent 16.0% 15 Satisfactory 14.9% 14 Very Good 24.5% 23 Needs Improvement 34.0% 32 Satisfactory 14.9% 14 No Opinion 11.7% 11 Needs Improvement 33.0% 31 No Opinion 11.7% 11 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 20.2% 19 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 20.2% 19 Excellent 25.5% 24 Satisfactory 17.0% 16 Very Good 16.0% 15 Needs Improvement 34.0% 32 Satisfactory 18.1% 17 No Opinion 8.5% 8

Needs Improvement 27.7% 26 No Opinion 12.8% 12

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 19.1% 18 Very Good 21.3% 20 Satisfactory 16.0% 15 Needs Improvement 31.9% 30

No Opinion 11.7% 11

Greg Glass 99 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 24.2% 24 Very Good 17.2% 17 Excellent 29.3% 29 Satisfactory 15.2% 15 Very Good 22.2% 22 Needs Improvement 23.2% 23 Satisfactory 13.1% 13 No Opinion 20.2% 20 Needs Improvement 17.2% 17 No Opinion 18.2% 18 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 26.3% 26 Very Good 17.2% 17 Excellent 27.3% 27 Satisfactory 20.2% 20 Very Good 20.2% 20 Needs Improvement 16.2% 16 Satisfactory 17.2% 17 No Opinion 20.2% 20 Needs Improvement 17.2% 17 No Opinion 18.2% 18 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 29.3% 29 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 20.2% 20 Excellent 33.3% 33 Satisfactory 17.2% 17 Very Good 22.2% 22 Needs Improvement 19.2% 19 Satisfactory 10.1% 10 No Opinion 14.1% 14

Needs Improvement 17.2% 17 No Opinion 17.2% 17

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 24.2% 24 Very Good 22.2% 22 Satisfactory 14.1% 14 Needs Improvement 17.2% 17

No Opinion 22.2% 22

Lori Chambers Gray 84 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 26.2% 22 Very Good 14.3% 12 Excellent 26.2% 22 Satisfactory 14.3% 12 Very Good 16.7% 14 Needs Improvement 33.3% 28 Satisfactory 13.1% 11 No Opinion 11.9% 10 Needs Improvement 32.1% 27 No Opinion 11.9% 10 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 26.2% 22 Very Good 15.5% 13 Excellent 25.0% 21 Satisfactory 17.9% 15 Very Good 17.9% 15 Needs Improvement 27.4% 23 Satisfactory 15.5% 13 No Opinion 13.1% 11 Needs Improvement 29.8% 25 No Opinion 11.9% 10 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 26.2% 22 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 17.9% 15 Excellent 29.8% 25 Satisfactory 15.5% 13 Very Good 19.0% 16 Needs Improvement 32.1% 27 Satisfactory 14.3% 12 No Opinion 8.3% 7

Needs Improvement 23.8% 20 No Opinion 13.1% 11

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 25.0% 21 Very Good 19.0% 16 Satisfactory 7.1% 6 Needs Improvement 33.3% 28

No Opinion 15.5% 13

Nikita V. Harmon 100 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 20.0% 20 Very Good 11.0% 11 Excellent 21.0% 21 Satisfactory 9.0% 9 Very Good 11.0% 11 Needs Improvement 45.0% 45 Satisfactory 12.0% 12 No Opinion 15.0% 15 Needs Improvement 41.0% 41 No Opinion 15.0% 15 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 22.0% 22 Very Good 9.0% 9 Excellent 21.0% 21 Satisfactory 10.0% 10 Very Good 12.0% 12 Needs Improvement 39.0% 39 Satisfactory 12.0% 12 No Opinion 20.0% 20 Needs Improvement 41.0% 41 No Opinion 14.0% 14 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 23.0% 23 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 10.0% 10 Excellent 19.0% 19 Satisfactory 8.0% 8 Very Good 10.0% 10 Needs Improvement 47.0% 47 Satisfactory 7.0% 7 No Opinion 12.0% 12

Needs Improvement 48.0% 48 No Opinion 16.0% 16

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 21.0% 21 Very Good 10.0% 10 Satisfactory 9.0% 9 Needs Improvement 44.0% 44

No Opinion 16.0% 16

Josh Hill 92 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 39.1% 36 Very Good 23.9% 22 Excellent 43.5% 40 Satisfactory 13.0% 12 Very Good 21.7% 20 Needs Improvement 10.9% 10 Satisfactory 12.0% 11 No Opinion 13.0% 12 Needs Improvement 13.0% 12 No Opinion 9.8% 9 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 41.3% 38 Very Good 27.2% 25 Excellent 37.0% 34 Satisfactory 8.7% 8 Very Good 28.3% 26 Needs Improvement 12.0% 11 Satisfactory 9.8% 9 No Opinion 10.9% 10 Needs Improvement 14.1% 13 No Opinion 10.9% 10 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 40.2% 37 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 25.0% 23 Excellent 45.7% 42 Satisfactory 13.0% 12 Very Good 25.0% 23 Needs Improvement 14.1% 13 Satisfactory 6.5% 6 No Opinion 7.6% 7

Needs Improvement 10.9% 10 No Opinion 12.0% 11

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 42.4% 39 Very Good 20.7% 19 Satisfactory 10.9% 10 Needs Improvement 13.0% 12

No Opinion 13.0% 12

Kelli Johnson 128 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 49.2% 63 Very Good 22.7% 29 Excellent 58.6% 75 Satisfactory 7.0% 9 Very Good 17.2% 22 Needs Improvement 8.6% 11 Satisfactory 8.6% 11 No Opinion 12.5% 16 Needs Improvement 7.0% 9 No Opinion 8.6% 11 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 59.4% 76 Very Good 19.5% 25 Excellent 55.5% 71 Satisfactory 7.0% 9 Very Good 16.4% 21 Needs Improvement 5.5% 7 Satisfactory 10.2% 13 No Opinion 8.6% 11 Needs Improvement 7.0% 9 No Opinion 10.9% 14 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 61.7% 79 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 17.2% 22 Excellent 64.1% 82 Satisfactory 7.8% 10 Very Good 16.4% 21 Needs Improvement 7.8% 10 Satisfactory 4.7% 6 No Opinion 5.5% 7

Needs Improvement 5.5% 7 No Opinion 9.4% 12

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 57.0% 73 Very Good 15.6% 20 Satisfactory 7.8% 10 Needs Improvement 7.0% 9

No Opinion 12.5% 16

Robert Johnson 120 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 24.2% 29 Very Good 6.7% 8 Excellent 23.3% 28 Satisfactory 10.8% 13 Very Good 8.3% 10 Needs Improvement 50.0% 60 Satisfactory 12.5% 15 No Opinion 8.3% 10 Needs Improvement 49.2% 59 No Opinion 6.7% 8 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 25.8% 31 Very Good 8.3% 10 Excellent 24.2% 29 Satisfactory 14.2% 17 Very Good 10.0% 12 Needs Improvement 42.5% 51 Satisfactory 14.2% 17 No Opinion 9.2% 11 Needs Improvement 44.2% 53 No Opinion 7.5% 9 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 25.0% 30 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 6.7% 8 Excellent 23.3% 28 Satisfactory 9.2% 11 Very Good 5.8% 7 Needs Improvement 54.2% 65 Satisfactory 8.3% 10 No Opinion 5.0% 6

Needs Improvement 55.0% 66 No Opinion 7.5% 9

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 24.2% 29 Very Good 6.7% 8 Satisfactory 13.3% 16 Needs Improvement 47.5% 57

No Opinion 8.3% 10

DaSean Jones 90 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 28.9% 26 Very Good 6.7% 6 Excellent 28.9% 26 Satisfactory 15.6% 14 Very Good 8.9% 8 Needs Improvement 34.4% 31 Satisfactory 12.2% 11 No Opinion 14.4% 13 Needs Improvement 41.1% 37 No Opinion 8.9% 8 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 28.9% 26 Very Good 10.0% 9 Excellent 27.8% 25 Satisfactory 16.7% 15 Very Good 11.1% 10 Needs Improvement 33.3% 30 Satisfactory 14.4% 13 No Opinion 11.1% 10 Needs Improvement 35.6% 32 No Opinion 11.1% 10 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 28.9% 26 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 8.9% 8 Excellent 27.8% 25 Satisfactory 16.7% 15 Very Good 8.9% 8 Needs Improvement 37.8% 34 Satisfactory 13.3% 12 No Opinion 7.8% 7

Needs Improvement 35.6% 32 No Opinion 14.4% 13

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 25.6% 23 Very Good 8.9% 8 Satisfactory 12.2% 11 Needs Improvement 37.8% 34

No Opinion 15.6% 14

Hazel B. Jones 101 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 27.7% 28 Very Good 7.9% 8 Excellent 29.7% 30 Satisfactory 7.9% 8 Very Good 12.9% 13 Needs Improvement 46.5% 47 Satisfactory 10.9% 11 No Opinion 9.9% 10 Needs Improvement 36.6% 37 No Opinion 9.9% 10 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 31.7% 32 Very Good 7.9% 8 Excellent 27.7% 28 Satisfactory 14.9% 15 Very Good 13.9% 14 Needs Improvement 37.6% 38 Satisfactory 8.9% 9 No Opinion 7.9% 8 Needs Improvement 40.6% 41 No Opinion 8.9% 9 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 31.7% 32 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 9.9% 10 Excellent 28.7% 29 Satisfactory 10.9% 11 Very Good 12.9% 13 Needs Improvement 41.6% 42 Satisfactory 8.9% 9 No Opinion 5.9% 6

Needs Improvement 40.6% 41 No Opinion 8.9% 9

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 30.7% 31 Very Good 10.9% 11 Satisfactory 11.9% 12 Needs Improvement 36.6% 37

No Opinion 9.9% 10

Danilo Lacayo 91 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 39.6% 36 Very Good 19.8% 18 Excellent 44.0% 40 Satisfactory 15.4% 14 Very Good 20.9% 19 Needs Improvement 9.9% 9 Satisfactory 12.1% 11 No Opinion 15.4% 14 Needs Improvement 13.2% 12 No Opinion 9.9% 9 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 47.3% 43 Very Good 17.6% 16 Excellent 41.8% 38 Satisfactory 11.0% 10 Very Good 22.0% 20 Needs Improvement 12.1% 11 Satisfactory 14.3% 13 No Opinion 12.1% 11 Needs Improvement 11.0% 10 No Opinion 11.0% 10 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 44.0% 40 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 18.7% 17 Excellent 50.5% 46 Satisfactory 13.2% 12 Very Good 19.8% 18 Needs Improvement 14.3% 13 Satisfactory 8.8% 8 No Opinion 9.9% 9

Needs Improvement 11.0% 10 No Opinion 9.9% 9

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 42.9% 39 Very Good 18.7% 17 Satisfactory 11.0% 10 Needs Improvement 16.5% 15

No Opinion 11.0% 10

Jason Luong 96 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 33.3% 32 Very Good 17.7% 17 Excellent 36.5% 35 Satisfactory 12.5% 12 Very Good 18.8% 18 Needs Improvement 20.8% 20 Satisfactory 12.5% 12 No Opinion 15.6% 15 Needs Improvement 18.8% 18 No Opinion 13.5% 13 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 36.5% 35 Very Good 17.7% 17 Excellent 35.4% 34 Satisfactory 11.5% 11 Very Good 18.8% 18 Needs Improvement 18.8% 18 Satisfactory 16.7% 16 No Opinion 15.6% 15 Needs Improvement 15.6% 15 No Opinion 13.5% 13 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 36.5% 35 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 19.8% 19 Excellent 34.4% 33 Satisfactory 13.5% 13 Very Good 21.9% 21 Needs Improvement 20.8% 20 Satisfactory 10.4% 10 No Opinion 9.4% 9

Needs Improvement 21.9% 21 No Opinion 11.5% 11

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 35.4% 34 Very Good 17.7% 17 Satisfactory 15.6% 15 Needs Improvement 18.8% 18

No Opinion 12.5% 12

Amy Martin 87 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 26.4% 23 Very Good 14.9% 13 Excellent 28.7% 25 Satisfactory 21.8% 19 Very Good 18.4% 16 Needs Improvement 18.4% 16 Satisfactory 14.9% 13 No Opinion 18.4% 16 Needs Improvement 21.8% 19 No Opinion 16.1% 14 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 28.7% 25 Very Good 18.4% 16 Excellent 27.6% 24 Satisfactory 19.5% 17 Very Good 19.5% 17 Needs Improvement 18.4% 16 Satisfactory 14.9% 13 No Opinion 14.9% 13 Needs Improvement 23.0% 20 No Opinion 14.9% 13 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 28.7% 25 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 12.6% 11 Excellent 29.9% 26 Satisfactory 20.7% 18 Very Good 13.8% 12 Needs Improvement 25.3% 22 Satisfactory 16.1% 14 No Opinion 12.6% 11

Needs Improvement 24.1% 21 No Opinion 16.1% 14

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 26.4% 23 Very Good 14.9% 13 Satisfactory 14.9% 13 Needs Improvement 27.6% 24

No Opinion 16.1% 14

Chris Morton 92 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 32.6% 30 Very Good 13.0% 12 Excellent 32.6% 30 Satisfactory 10.9% 10 Very Good 15.2% 14 Needs Improvement 25.0% 23 Satisfactory 7.6% 7 No Opinion 18.5% 17 Needs Improvement 28.3% 26 No Opinion 16.3% 15 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 34.8% 32 Very Good 12.0% 11 Excellent 34.8% 32 Satisfactory 15.2% 14 Very Good 14.1% 13 Needs Improvement 20.7% 19 Satisfactory 14.1% 13 No Opinion 17.4% 16 Needs Improvement 19.6% 18 No Opinion 17.4% 16 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 31.5% 29 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 18.5% 17 Excellent 42.4% 39 Satisfactory 7.6% 7 Very Good 12.0% 11 Needs Improvement 28.3% 26 Satisfactory 10.9% 10 No Opinion 14.1% 13

Needs Improvement 19.6% 18 No Opinion 15.2% 14

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 34.8% 32 Very Good 12.0% 11 Satisfactory 7.6% 7 Needs Improvement 30.4% 28

No Opinion 15.2% 14

George Powell 94 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 29.8% 28 Very Good 13.8% 13 Excellent 29.8% 28 Satisfactory 14.9% 14 Very Good 17.0% 16 Needs Improvement 28.7% 27 Satisfactory 12.8% 12 No Opinion 12.8% 12 Needs Improvement 26.6% 25 No Opinion 13.8% 13 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 28.7% 27 Very Good 10.6% 10 Excellent 30.9% 29 Satisfactory 17.0% 16 Very Good 11.7% 11 Needs Improvement 25.5% 24 Satisfactory 14.9% 14 No Opinion 18.1% 17 Needs Improvement 26.6% 25 No Opinion 16.0% 15 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 33.0% 31 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 16.0% 15 Excellent 39.4% 37 Satisfactory 13.8% 13 Very Good 16.0% 15 Needs Improvement 27.7% 26 Satisfactory 9.6% 9 No Opinion 9.6% 9

Needs Improvement 21.3% 20 No Opinion 13.8% 13

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 36.2% 34 Very Good 13.8% 13 Satisfactory 9.6% 9 Needs Improvement 25.5% 24

No Opinion 14.9% 14

Herb Ritchie 101 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 21.8% 22 Very Good 13.9% 14 Excellent 32.7% 33 Satisfactory 22.8% 23 Very Good 16.8% 17 Needs Improvement 24.8% 25 Satisfactory 18.8% 19 No Opinion 16.8% 17 Needs Improvement 19.8% 20 No Opinion 11.9% 12 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 28.7% 29 Very Good 16.8% 17 Excellent 25.7% 26 Satisfactory 18.8% 19 Very Good 16.8% 17 Needs Improvement 22.8% 23 Satisfactory 23.8% 24 No Opinion 12.9% 13 Needs Improvement 21.8% 22 No Opinion 11.9% 12 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 28.7% 29 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 16.8% 17 Excellent 30.7% 31 Satisfactory 22.8% 23 Very Good 19.8% 20 Needs Improvement 21.8% 22 Satisfactory 19.8% 20 No Opinion 9.9% 10

Needs Improvement 16.8% 17 No Opinion 12.9% 13

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 31.7% 32 Very Good 15.8% 16 Satisfactory 17.8% 18 Needs Improvement 20.8% 21

No Opinion 13.9% 14

Randy Roll 107 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 20.6% 22 Very Good 8.4% 9 Excellent 19.6% 21 Satisfactory 15.0% 16 Very Good 13.1% 14 Needs Improvement 41.1% 44 Satisfactory 13.1% 14 No Opinion 15.0% 16 Needs Improvement 43.9% 47 No Opinion 10.3% 11 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 23.4% 25 Very Good 7.5% 8 Excellent 20.6% 22 Satisfactory 16.8% 18 Very Good 13.1% 14 Needs Improvement 40.2% 43 Satisfactory 20.6% 22 No Opinion 12.1% 13 Needs Improvement 34.6% 37 No Opinion 11.2% 12 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 21.5% 23 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 10.3% 11 Excellent 23.4% 25 Satisfactory 18.7% 20 Very Good 11.2% 12 Needs Improvement 43.0% 46 Satisfactory 13.1% 14 No Opinion 6.5% 7

Needs Improvement 42.1% 45 No Opinion 10.3% 11

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 20.6% 22 Very Good 8.4% 9 Satisfactory 19.6% 21 Needs Improvement 40.2% 43

No Opinion 11.2% 12

Chuck Silverman 98 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 32.7% 32 Very Good 14.3% 14 Excellent 35.7% 35 Satisfactory 11.2% 11 Very Good 12.2% 12 Needs Improvement 20.4% 20 Satisfactory 11.2% 11 No Opinion 21.4% 21 Needs Improvement 22.4% 22 No Opinion 18.4% 18 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 36.7% 36 Very Good 12.2% 12 Excellent 35.7% 35 Satisfactory 10.2% 10 Very Good 15.3% 15 Needs Improvement 21.4% 21 Satisfactory 9.2% 9 No Opinion 19.4% 19 Needs Improvement 20.4% 20 No Opinion 19.4% 19 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 34.7% 34 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 13.3% 13 Excellent 30.6% 30 Satisfactory 12.2% 12 Very Good 17.3% 17 Needs Improvement 22.4% 22 Satisfactory 11.2% 11 No Opinion 17.3% 17

Needs Improvement 21.4% 21 No Opinion 19.4% 19

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 35.7% 35 Very Good 13.3% 13 Satisfactory 11.2% 11 Needs Improvement 21.4% 21

No Opinion 18.4% 18

Hilary Unger 88 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 36.4% 32 Very Good 19.3% 17 Excellent 37.5% 33 Satisfactory 10.2% 9 Very Good 17.0% 15 Needs Improvement 25.0% 22 Satisfactory 12.5% 11 No Opinion 9.1% 8 Needs Improvement 26.1% 23 No Opinion 6.8% 6 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 37.5% 33 Very Good 19.3% 17 Excellent 36.4% 32 Satisfactory 9.1% 8 Very Good 20.5% 18 Needs Improvement 23.9% 21 Satisfactory 10.2% 9 No Opinion 10.2% 9 Needs Improvement 23.9% 21 No Opinion 9.1% 8 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 38.6% 34 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 18.2% 16 Excellent 39.8% 35 Satisfactory 11.4% 10 Very Good 15.9% 14 Needs Improvement 27.3% 24 Satisfactory 9.1% 8 No Opinion 4.5% 4

Needs Improvement 25.0% 22 No Opinion 10.2% 9

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 39.8% 35 Very Good 15.9% 14 Satisfactory 6.8% 6 Needs Improvement 25.0% 22

No Opinion 12.5% 11

Brian E. Warren 98 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 43.9% 43 Very Good 19.4% 19 Excellent 43.9% 43 Satisfactory 11.2% 11 Very Good 25.5% 25 Needs Improvement 13.3% 13 Satisfactory 5.1% 5 No Opinion 12.2% 12 Needs Improvement 13.3% 13 No Opinion 12.2% 12 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 42.9% 42 Very Good 19.4% 19 Excellent 43.9% 43 Satisfactory 9.2% 9 Very Good 26.5% 26 Needs Improvement 15.3% 15 Satisfactory 5.1% 5 No Opinion 13.3% 13 Needs Improvement 13.3% 13 No Opinion 11.2% 11 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 42.9% 42 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 20.4% 20 Excellent 43.9% 43 Satisfactory 10.2% 10 Very Good 23.5% 23 Needs Improvement 14.3% 14 Satisfactory 6.1% 6 No Opinion 12.2% 12

Needs Improvement 14.3% 14 No Opinion 12.2% 12

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 43.9% 43 Very Good 23.5% 23 Satisfactory 7.1% 7 Needs Improvement 14.3% 14 No Opinion 11.2% 11

Family District Courts Janice Berg 204 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 49.0% 100 Very Good 22.5% 46 Excellent 52.9% 108 Satisfactory 6.9% 14 Very Good 26.0% 53 Needs Improvement 8.8% 18 Satisfactory 9.3% 19 No Opinion 12.7% 26 Needs Improvement 4.9% 10 No Opinion 6.9% 14 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 56.4% 115 Very Good 19.1% 39 Excellent 48.5% 99 Satisfactory 9.3% 19 Very Good 27.0% 55 Needs Improvement 5.4% 11 Satisfactory 10.3% 21 No Opinion 9.8% 20 Needs Improvement 5.9% 12 No Opinion 8.3% 17 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 56.4% 115 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 22.1% 45 Excellent 59.3% 121 Satisfactory 9.8% 20 Very Good 22.5% 46 Needs Improvement 6.4% 13 Satisfactory 4.9% 10 No Opinion 5.4% 11

Needs Improvement 5.4% 11 No Opinion 7.8% 16

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 58.3% 119 Very Good 18.1% 37 Satisfactory 8.3% 17 Needs Improvement 5.9% 12 No Opinion 9.3% 19

Linda Marie Dunson 183 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 16.9% 31 Very Good 12.0% 22 Excellent 18.6% 34 Satisfactory 16.9% 31 Very Good 8.2% 15 Needs Improvement 46.4% 85 Satisfactory 12.0% 22 No Opinion 7.7% 14 Needs Improvement 54.6% 100 No Opinion 6.6% 12 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 20.8% 38 Very Good 14.2% 26 Excellent 18.6% 34 Satisfactory 16.9% 31 Very Good 12.0% 22 Needs Improvement 37.7% 69 Satisfactory 15.8% 29 No Opinion 10.4% 19 Needs Improvement 47.0% 86 No Opinion 6.6% 12 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 16.4% 30 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 13.7% 25 Excellent 29.5% 54 Satisfactory 14.8% 27 Very Good 17.5% 32 Needs Improvement 49.7% 91 Satisfactory 18.0% 33 No Opinion 5.5% 10

Needs Improvement 28.4% 52 No Opinion 6.6% 12

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 25.1% 46 Very Good 13.7% 25 Satisfactory 20.2% 37 Needs Improvement 29.5% 54 No Opinion 11.5% 21

Angela L. Graves-Harrington 183 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 23.0% 42 Very Good 13.7% 25 Excellent 22.4% 41 Satisfactory 21.3% 39 Very Good 12.0% 22 Needs Improvement 29.5% 54 Satisfactory 24.0% 44 No Opinion 12.6% 23 Needs Improvement 30.6% 56 No Opinion 10.9% 20 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 26.8% 49 Very Good 13.7% 25 Excellent 25.1% 46 Satisfactory 20.8% 38 Very Good 15.3% 28 Needs Improvement 25.7% 47 Satisfactory 23.5% 43 No Opinion 13.1% 24 Needs Improvement 26.2% 48 No Opinion 9.8% 18 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 23.0% 42 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 13.1% 24 Excellent 31.1% 57 Satisfactory 23.5% 43 Very Good 14.2% 26 Needs Improvement 30.1% 55 Satisfactory 19.7% 36 No Opinion 10.4% 19

Needs Improvement 22.4% 41 No Opinion 12.6% 23

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 26.8% 49 Very Good 12.6% 23 Satisfactory 21.9% 40 Needs Improvement 26.2% 48 No Opinion 12.6% 23

Sonya L. Heath 189 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 31.7% 60 Very Good 22.8% 43 Excellent 33.9% 64 Satisfactory 16.4% 31 Very Good 24.9% 47 Needs Improvement 12.2% 23 Satisfactory 18.0% 34 No Opinion 16.9% 32 Needs Improvement 12.2% 23 No Opinion 11.1% 21 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 35.4% 67 Very Good 24.3% 46 Excellent 34.4% 65 Satisfactory 14.8% 28 Very Good 26.5% 50 Needs Improvement 11.6% 22 Satisfactory 13.8% 26 No Opinion 13.8% 26 Needs Improvement 12.7% 24 No Opinion 12.7% 24 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 34.4% 65 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 26.5% 50 Excellent 43.4% 82 Satisfactory 16.9% 32 Very Good 22.8% 43 Needs Improvement 13.2% 25 Satisfactory 10.1% 19 No Opinion 9.0% 17

Needs Improvement 12.7% 24 No Opinion 11.1% 21

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 35.4% 67 Very Good 24.3% 46 Satisfactory 13.2% 25 Needs Improvement 11.1% 21 No Opinion 15.9% 30

Tristan H. Longino 183 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 37.7% 69 Very Good 18.6% 34 Excellent 44.3% 81 Satisfactory 15.8% 29 Very Good 23.5% 43 Needs Improvement 16.9% 31 Satisfactory 10.9% 20 No Opinion 10.9% 20 Needs Improvement 12.0% 22 No Opinion 9.3% 17 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 46.4% 85 Very Good 21.9% 40 Excellent 43.2% 79 Satisfactory 10.9% 20 Very Good 23.5% 43 Needs Improvement 10.9% 20 Satisfactory 10.9% 20 No Opinion 9.8% 18 Needs Improvement 12.0% 22 No Opinion 10.4% 19 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 40.4% 74 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 24.0% 44 Excellent 38.8% 71 Satisfactory 13.7% 25 Very Good 25.7% 47 Needs Improvement 14.2% 26 Satisfactory 9.8% 18 No Opinion 7.7% 14

Needs Improvement 14.2% 26 No Opinion 11.5% 21

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 41.0% 75 Very Good 20.2% 37 Satisfactory 14.2% 26 Needs Improvement 11.5% 21 No Opinion 13.1% 24

Gloria E. Lopez 189 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 22.8% 43 Very Good 21.2% 40 Excellent 24.3% 46 Satisfactory 14.3% 27 Very Good 21.2% 40 Needs Improvement 30.7% 58 Satisfactory 14.8% 28 No Opinion 11.1% 21 Needs Improvement 31.2% 59 No Opinion 8.5% 16 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 30.7% 58 Very Good 19.6% 37 Excellent 26.5% 50 Satisfactory 13.2% 25 Very Good 21.7% 41 Needs Improvement 26.5% 50 Satisfactory 16.9% 32 No Opinion 10.1% 19 Needs Improvement 26.5% 50 No Opinion 8.5% 16 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 24.9% 47 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 22.2% 42 Excellent 25.9% 49 Satisfactory 14.8% 28 Very Good 18.5% 35 Needs Improvement 31.7% 60 Satisfactory 15.3% 29 No Opinion 6.3% 12

Needs Improvement 29.6% 56 No Opinion 10.6% 20

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 25.4% 48 Very Good 19.0% 36 Satisfactory 15.3% 29 Needs Improvement 29.1% 55 No Opinion 11.1% 21

Julia Maldonado 217 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 19.8% 43 Very Good 10.6% 23 Excellent 21.2% 46 Satisfactory 16.1% 35 Very Good 10.6% 23 Needs Improvement 45.2% 98 Satisfactory 12.4% 27 No Opinion 8.3% 18 Needs Improvement 47.9% 104 No Opinion 7.8% 17 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 23.0% 50 Very Good 15.2% 33 Excellent 22.6% 49 Satisfactory 16.6% 36 Very Good 14.3% 31 Needs Improvement 33.2% 72 Satisfactory 21.7% 47 No Opinion 12.0% 26 Needs Improvement 32.7% 71 No Opinion 8.8% 19 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 20.3% 44 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 11.5% 25 Excellent 20.3% 44 Satisfactory 18.4% 40 Very Good 11.5% 25 Needs Improvement 43.3% 94 Satisfactory 15.7% 34 No Opinion 6.5% 14

Needs Improvement 43.8% 95 No Opinion 8.8% 19

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 22.6% 49 Very Good 12.9% 28 Satisfactory 14.7% 32 Needs Improvement 39.2% 85 No Opinion 10.6% 23

Sandra Peake 183 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 36.6% 67 Very Good 24.6% 45 Excellent 37.7% 69 Satisfactory 14.2% 26 Very Good 27.3% 50 Needs Improvement 13.7% 25 Satisfactory 13.1% 24 No Opinion 10.9% 20 Needs Improvement 13.1% 24 No Opinion 8.7% 16 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 37.7% 69 Very Good 27.9% 51 Excellent 36.6% 67 Satisfactory 12.6% 23 Very Good 27.9% 51 Needs Improvement 12.0% 22 Satisfactory 12.0% 22 No Opinion 9.8% 18 Needs Improvement 13.1% 24 No Opinion 10.4% 19 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 38.3% 70 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 26.2% 48 Excellent 41.5% 76 Satisfactory 14.2% 26 Very Good 24.0% 44 Needs Improvement 14.2% 26 Satisfactory 14.2% 26 No Opinion 7.1% 13

Needs Improvement 9.8% 18 No Opinion 10.4% 19

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 39.3% 72 Very Good 21.9% 40 Satisfactory 14.2% 26 Needs Improvement 11.5% 21 No Opinion 13.1% 24

Barbara J. Stalder 162 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 31.5% 51 Very Good 18.5% 30 Excellent 32.1% 52 Satisfactory 13.6% 22 Very Good 21.6% 35 Needs Improvement 18.5% 30 Satisfactory 9.3% 15 No Opinion 17.9% 29 Needs Improvement 25.3% 41 No Opinion 11.7% 19 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 37.7% 61 Very Good 20.4% 33 Excellent 34.0% 55 Satisfactory 11.1% 18 Very Good 21.0% 34 Needs Improvement 17.3% 28 Satisfactory 14.2% 23 No Opinion 13.6% 22 Needs Improvement 16.7% 27 No Opinion 14.2% 23 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 32.7% 53 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 20.4% 33 Excellent 37.7% 61 Satisfactory 11.7% 19 Very Good 17.3% 28 Needs Improvement 23.5% 38 Satisfactory 10.5% 17 No Opinion 11.7% 19

Needs Improvement 20.4% 33 No Opinion 14.2% 23

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 30.2% 49 Very Good 12.3% 20 Satisfactory 14.2% 23 Needs Improvement 27.2% 44 No Opinion 16.0% 26

Germaine J. Tanner 189 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 40.2% 76 Very Good 28.0% 53 Excellent 41.8% 79 Satisfactory 8.5% 16 Very Good 28.6% 54 Needs Improvement 14.8% 28 Satisfactory 10.6% 20 No Opinion 8.5% 16 Needs Improvement 13.8% 26 No Opinion 5.3% 10 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 45.0% 85 Very Good 24.3% 46 Excellent 40.7% 77 Satisfactory 12.7% 24 Very Good 29.1% 55 Needs Improvement 10.6% 20 Satisfactory 11.6% 22 No Opinion 7.4% 14 Needs Improvement 12.2% 23 No Opinion 6.3% 12 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 43.4% 82 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 27.0% 51 Excellent 43.9% 83 Satisfactory 11.1% 21 Very Good 24.9% 47 Needs Improvement 13.2% 25 Satisfactory 11.1% 21 No Opinion 5.3% 10

Needs Improvement 13.2% 25 No Opinion 6.9% 13

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 40.2% 76 Very Good 25.4% 48 Satisfactory 11.1% 21 Needs Improvement 15.3% 29 No Opinion 7.9% 15

Clinton E. Wells, Jr. 201 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 39.3% 79 Very Good 20.9% 42 Excellent 39.8% 80 Satisfactory 14.4% 29 Very Good 18.4% 37 Needs Improvement 13.4% 27 Satisfactory 16.9% 34 No Opinion 11.9% 24 Needs Improvement 15.4% 31 No Opinion 9.5% 19 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 39.8% 80 Very Good 22.4% 45 Excellent 40.3% 81 Satisfactory 12.4% 25 Very Good 20.4% 41 Needs Improvement 13.4% 27 Satisfactory 14.9% 30 No Opinion 11.9% 24 Needs Improvement 11.4% 23 No Opinion 12.9% 26 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 36.8% 74 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 23.9% 48 Excellent 39.3% 79 Satisfactory 16.4% 33 Very Good 16.4% 33 Needs Improvement 14.4% 29 Satisfactory 10.9% 22 No Opinion 8.5% 17

Needs Improvement 21.9% 44 No Opinion 11.4% 23

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 37.3% 75 Very Good 20.9% 42 Satisfactory 11.9% 24 Needs Improvement 15.9% 32 No Opinion 13.9% 28

Juvenile District Courts Michelle Moore 100 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 49.0% 49 Very Good 10.0% 10 Excellent 52.0% 52 Satisfactory 13.0% 13 Very Good 13.0% 13 Needs Improvement 16.0% 16 Satisfactory 11.0% 11 No Opinion 12.0% 12 Needs Improvement 15.0% 15 No Opinion 9.0% 9 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 49.0% 49 Very Good 12.0% 12 Excellent 52.0% 52 Satisfactory 11.0% 11 Very Good 13.0% 13 Needs Improvement 15.0% 15 Satisfactory 13.0% 13 No Opinion 13.0% 13 Needs Improvement 13.0% 13 No Opinion 9.0% 9 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 51.0% 51 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 14.0% 14 Excellent 55.0% 55 Satisfactory 11.0% 11 Very Good 11.0% 11 Needs Improvement 15.0% 15 Satisfactory 11.0% 11 No Opinion 9.0% 9

Needs Improvement 14.0% 14 No Opinion 9.0% 9

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 50.0% 50 Very Good 14.0% 14 Satisfactory 9.0% 9 Needs Improvement 17.0% 17 No Opinion 10.0% 10

Natalia Cokinos Oakes 114 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 42.1% 48 Very Good 14.9% 17 Excellent 41.2% 47 Satisfactory 12.3% 14 Very Good 16.7% 19 Needs Improvement 20.2% 23 Satisfactory 13.2% 15 No Opinion 10.5% 12 Needs Improvement 21.9% 25 No Opinion 7.0% 8 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 43.0% 49 Very Good 17.5% 20 Excellent 42.1% 48 Satisfactory 8.8% 10 Very Good 14.9% 17 Needs Improvement 22.8% 26 Satisfactory 15.8% 18 No Opinion 7.9% 9 Needs Improvement 19.3% 22 No Opinion 7.9% 9 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 42.1% 48 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 20.2% 23 Excellent 47.4% 54 Satisfactory 11.4% 13 Very Good 18.4% 21 Needs Improvement 21.1% 24 Satisfactory 8.8% 10 No Opinion 5.3% 6

Needs Improvement 16.7% 19 No Opinion 8.8% 10

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 44.7% 51 Very Good 20.2% 23 Satisfactory 6.1% 7 Needs Improvement 20.2% 23 No Opinion 8.8% 10

Leah Shapiro 111 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 43.2% 48 Very Good 11.7% 13 Excellent 45.0% 50 Satisfactory 9.9% 11 Very Good 13.5% 15 Needs Improvement 22.5% 25 Satisfactory 6.3% 7 No Opinion 12.6% 14 Needs Improvement 21.6% 24 No Opinion 13.5% 15 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 47.7% 53 Very Good 15.3% 17 Excellent 43.2% 48 Satisfactory 7.2% 8 Very Good 16.2% 18 Needs Improvement 18.9% 21 Satisfactory 5.4% 6 No Opinion 10.8% 12 Needs Improvement 23.4% 26 No Opinion 11.7% 13 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 43.2% 48 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 18.0% 20 Excellent 41.4% 46 Satisfactory 6.3% 7 Very Good 18.0% 20 Needs Improvement 22.5% 25 Satisfactory 5.4% 6 No Opinion 9.9% 11

Needs Improvement 23.4% 26 No Opinion 11.7% 13

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 41.4% 46 Very Good 18.0% 20 Satisfactory 6.3% 7 Needs Improvement 23.4% 26 No Opinion 10.8% 12

Probate Courts Jason Cox 160 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 51.9% 83 Very Good 20.0% 32 Excellent 53.1% 85 Satisfactory 5.0% 8 Very Good 21.9% 35 Needs Improvement 7.5% 12 Satisfactory 5.6% 9 No Opinion 15.6% 25 Needs Improvement 6.9% 11 No Opinion 12.5% 20 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 56.9% 91 Very Good 18.1% 29 Excellent 49.4% 79 Satisfactory 4.4% 7 Very Good 23.1% 37 Needs Improvement 6.3% 10 Satisfactory 5.0% 8 No Opinion 14.4% 23 Needs Improvement 7.5% 12 No Opinion 15.0% 24 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 55.0% 88 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 21.3% 34 Excellent 60.6% 97 Satisfactory 5.6% 9 Very Good 16.3% 26 Needs Improvement 5.6% 9 Satisfactory 4.4% 7 No Opinion 12.5% 20

Needs Improvement 5.6% 9 No Opinion 13.1% 21

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 54.4% 87 Very Good 14.4% 23 Satisfactory 4.4% 7 Needs Improvement 6.3% 10 No Opinion 20.6% 33

James Horwitz 158 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 42.4% 67 Very Good 21.5% 34 Excellent 48.1% 76 Satisfactory 11.4% 18 Very Good 17.1% 27 Needs Improvement 9.5% 15 Satisfactory 12.0% 19 No Opinion 15.2% 24 Needs Improvement 9.5% 15 No Opinion 13.3% 21 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 47.5% 75 Very Good 17.7% 28 Excellent 44.3% 70 Satisfactory 11.4% 18 Very Good 21.5% 34 Needs Improvement 8.9% 14 Satisfactory 12.0% 19 No Opinion 14.6% 23 Needs Improvement 8.2% 13 No Opinion 13.9% 22 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 46.2% 73 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 21.5% 34 Excellent 52.5% 83 Satisfactory 10.1% 16 Very Good 20.3% 32 Needs Improvement 9.5% 15 Satisfactory 5.7% 9 No Opinion 12.7% 20

Needs Improvement 7.6% 12 No Opinion 13.9% 22

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 50.6% 80 Very Good 19.6% 31 Satisfactory 7.0% 11 Needs Improvement 7.6% 12 No Opinion 15.2% 24

Michael Newman 162 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 43.2% 70 Very Good 17.9% 29 Excellent 42.6% 69 Satisfactory 9.3% 15 Very Good 20.4% 33 Needs Improvement 10.5% 17 Satisfactory 9.9% 16 No Opinion 19.1% 31 Needs Improvement 9.9% 16 No Opinion 17.3% 28 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 45.1% 73 Very Good 20.4% 33 Excellent 42.0% 68 Satisfactory 9.9% 16 Very Good 20.4% 33 Needs Improvement 6.8% 11 Satisfactory 9.3% 15 No Opinion 17.9% 29 Needs Improvement 9.3% 15 No Opinion 19.1% 31 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 42.6% 69 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 22.8% 37 Excellent 48.8% 79 Satisfactory 5.6% 9 Very Good 19.8% 32 Needs Improvement 11.7% 19 Satisfactory 5.6% 9 No Opinion 17.3% 28

Needs Improvement 8.6% 14 No Opinion 17.3% 28

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 42.0% 68 Very Good 17.9% 29 Satisfactory 8.6% 14 Needs Improvement 11.1% 18 No Opinion 20.4% 33

Jerry Simoneaux 184 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 55.4% 102 Very Good 18.5% 34 Excellent 55.4% 102 Satisfactory 5.4% 10 Very Good 20.1% 37 Needs Improvement 5.4% 10 Satisfactory 5.4% 10 No Opinion 15.2% 28 Needs Improvement 7.1% 13 No Opinion 12.0% 22 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 57.1% 105 Very Good 19.0% 35 Excellent 51.6% 95 Satisfactory 5.4% 10 Very Good 22.8% 42 Needs Improvement 4.9% 9 Satisfactory 6.5% 12 No Opinion 13.6% 25 Needs Improvement 4.3% 8 No Opinion 14.7% 27 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 57.1% 105 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 21.7% 40 Excellent 59.8% 110 Satisfactory 5.4% 10 Very Good 17.9% 33 Needs Improvement 6.0% 11 Satisfactory 3.3% 6 No Opinion 9.8% 18

Needs Improvement 4.3% 8 No Opinion 14.7% 27

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 53.8% 99 Very Good 20.1% 37 Satisfactory 4.9% 9 Needs Improvement 4.9% 9 No Opinion 16.3% 30

Associate Judges, Family District Courts Bethany Arnold 123 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 48.8% 60 Very Good 18.7% 23 Excellent 48.0% 59 Satisfactory 13.0% 16 Very Good 22.8% 28 Needs Improvement 10.6% 13 Satisfactory 13.0% 16 No Opinion 8.9% 11 Needs Improvement 9.8% 12 No Opinion 6.5% 8 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 48.0% 59 Very Good 17.9% 22 Excellent 44.7% 55 Satisfactory 17.1% 21 Very Good 23.6% 29 Needs Improvement 7.3% 9 Satisfactory 13.8% 17 No Opinion 9.8% 12 Needs Improvement 7.3% 9 No Opinion 10.6% 13 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 49.6% 61 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 18.7% 23 Excellent 53.7% 66 Satisfactory 16.3% 20 Very Good 18.7% 23 Needs Improvement 8.1% 10 Satisfactory 9.8% 12 No Opinion 7.3% 9

Needs Improvement 6.5% 8 No Opinion 11.4% 14

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 47.2% 58 Very Good 17.9% 22 Satisfactory 13.8% 17 Needs Improvement 9.8% 12 No Opinion 11.4% 14

Kimberly Baughman 139 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 46.8% 65 Very Good 22.3% 31 Excellent 46.0% 64 Satisfactory 12.9% 18 Very Good 23.7% 33 Needs Improvement 10.8% 15 Satisfactory 12.9% 18 No Opinion 7.2% 10 Needs Improvement 7.9% 11 No Opinion 9.4% 13 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 46.0% 64 Very Good 23.7% 33 Excellent 45.3% 63 Satisfactory 12.2% 17 Very Good 26.6% 37 Needs Improvement 8.6% 12 Satisfactory 10.1% 14 No Opinion 9.4% 13 Needs Improvement 10.8% 15 No Opinion 7.2% 10 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 43.9% 61 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 27.3% 38 Excellent 47.5% 66 Satisfactory 12.2% 17 Very Good 24.5% 34 Needs Improvement 10.1% 14 Satisfactory 9.4% 13 No Opinion 6.5% 9

Needs Improvement 10.8% 15 No Opinion 7.9% 11

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 45.3% 63 Very Good 23.7% 33 Satisfactory 12.2% 17 Needs Improvement 10.8% 15 No Opinion 7.9% 11

Charles Collins 131 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 35.1% 46 Very Good 28.2% 37 Excellent 34.4% 45 Satisfactory 11.5% 15 Very Good 33.6% 44 Needs Improvement 13.0% 17 Satisfactory 11.5% 15 No Opinion 12.2% 16 Needs Improvement 11.5% 15 No Opinion 9.2% 12 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 36.6% 48 Very Good 27.5% 36 Excellent 36.6% 48 Satisfactory 12.2% 16 Very Good 32.8% 43 Needs Improvement 10.7% 14 Satisfactory 9.9% 13 No Opinion 13.0% 17 Needs Improvement 10.7% 14 No Opinion 9.9% 13 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 35.1% 46 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 32.1% 42 Excellent 38.9% 51 Satisfactory 12.2% 16 Very Good 29.0% 38 Needs Improvement 11.5% 15 Satisfactory 9.9% 13 No Opinion 9.2% 12

Needs Improvement 9.9% 13 No Opinion 12.2% 16

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 35.9% 47 Very Good 28.2% 37 Satisfactory 11.5% 15 Needs Improvement 9.2% 12 No Opinion 15.3% 20

James Cooper 161 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 64.0% 103 Very Good 16.1% 26 Excellent 67.7% 109 Satisfactory 3.1% 5 Very Good 15.5% 25 Needs Improvement 3.1% 5 Satisfactory 1.9% 3 No Opinion 13.7% 22 Needs Improvement 3.7% 6 No Opinion 11.2% 18 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 65.8% 106 Very Good 16.1% 26 Excellent 67.7% 109 Satisfactory 2.5% 4 Very Good 13.0% 21 Needs Improvement 3.1% 5 Satisfactory 3.1% 5 No Opinion 12.4% 20 Needs Improvement 5.0% 8 No Opinion 11.2% 18 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 65.2% 105 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 17.4% 28 Excellent 64.6% 104 Satisfactory 2.5% 4 Very Good 14.9% 24 Needs Improvement 3.7% 6 Satisfactory 4.3% 7 No Opinion 11.2% 18

Needs Improvement 5.6% 9 No Opinion 10.6% 17

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 64.6% 104 Very Good 14.3% 23 Satisfactory 3.7% 6 Needs Improvement 4.3% 7 No Opinion 13.0% 21

Jim Evans 162 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 31.5% 51 Very Good 21.0% 34 Excellent 33.3% 54 Satisfactory 14.2% 23 Very Good 24.1% 39 Needs Improvement 24.7% 40 Satisfactory 15.4% 25 No Opinion 8.6% 14 Needs Improvement 21.6% 35 No Opinion 5.6% 9 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 40.7% 66 Very Good 25.9% 42 Excellent 33.3% 54 Satisfactory 14.2% 23 Very Good 25.9% 42 Needs Improvement 11.1% 18 Satisfactory 17.3% 28 No Opinion 8.0% 13 Needs Improvement 16.0% 26 No Opinion 7.4% 12 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 32.1% 52 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 27.8% 45 Excellent 44.4% 72 Satisfactory 16.7% 27 Very Good 24.7% 40 Needs Improvement 19.1% 31 Satisfactory 10.5% 17 No Opinion 4.3% 7

Needs Improvement 13.6% 22 No Opinion 6.8% 11

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 38.9% 63 Very Good 21.6% 35 Satisfactory 16.7% 27 Needs Improvement 13.6% 22 No Opinion 9.3% 15

Katrina M. Griffith 118 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 29.7% 35 Very Good 9.3% 11 Excellent 43.2% 51 Satisfactory 11.9% 14 Very Good 14.4% 17 Needs Improvement 17.8% 21 Satisfactory 9.3% 11 No Opinion 31.4% 37 Needs Improvement 5.9% 7 No Opinion 27.1% 32 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 43.2% 51 Very Good 11.9% 14 Excellent 40.7% 48 Satisfactory 9.3% 11 Very Good 15.3% 18 Needs Improvement 7.6% 9 Satisfactory 10.2% 12 No Opinion 28.0% 33 Needs Improvement 6.8% 8 No Opinion 27.1% 32 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 37.3% 44 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 19.5% 23 Excellent 39.0% 46 Satisfactory 8.5% 10 Very Good 14.4% 17 Needs Improvement 8.5% 10 Satisfactory 8.5% 10 No Opinion 26.3% 31

Needs Improvement 8.5% 10 No Opinion 29.7% 35

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 39.8% 47 Very Good 12.7% 15 Satisfactory 9.3% 11 Needs Improvement 7.6% 9 No Opinion 30.5% 36

Deborah Patterson 160 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 58.1% 93 Very Good 16.9% 27 Excellent 65.6% 105 Satisfactory 5.6% 9 Very Good 16.3% 26 Needs Improvement 6.9% 11 Satisfactory 4.4% 7 No Opinion 12.5% 20 Needs Improvement 7.5% 12 No Opinion 6.3% 10 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 64.4% 103 Very Good 15.6% 25 Excellent 66.9% 107 Satisfactory 5.0% 8 Very Good 16.3% 26 Needs Improvement 7.5% 12 Satisfactory 4.4% 7 No Opinion 7.5% 12 Needs Improvement 6.3% 10 No Opinion 6.3% 10 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 63.8% 102 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 16.3% 26 Excellent 60.0% 96 Satisfactory 5.0% 8 Very Good 15.0% 24 Needs Improvement 8.1% 13 Satisfactory 10.0% 16 No Opinion 6.9% 11

Needs Improvement 5.6% 9 No Opinion 9.4% 15

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 60.6% 97 Very Good 16.3% 26 Satisfactory 4.4% 7 Needs Improvement 8.1% 13 No Opinion 10.6% 17

Frank Pierce 120 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 28.3% 34 Very Good 24.2% 29 Excellent 24.2% 29 Satisfactory 21.7% 26 Very Good 19.2% 23 Needs Improvement 12.5% 15 Satisfactory 29.2% 35 No Opinion 13.3% 16 Needs Improvement 13.3% 16 No Opinion 14.2% 17 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 29.2% 35 Very Good 24.2% 29 Excellent 25.0% 30 Satisfactory 20.0% 24 Very Good 25.8% 31 Needs Improvement 13.3% 16 Satisfactory 21.7% 26 No Opinion 13.3% 16 Needs Improvement 13.3% 16 No Opinion 14.2% 17 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 25.8% 31 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 25.0% 30 Excellent 34.2% 41 Satisfactory 23.3% 28 Very Good 28.3% 34 Needs Improvement 15.0% 18 Satisfactory 15.8% 19 No Opinion 10.8% 13

Needs Improvement 9.2% 11 No Opinion 12.5% 15

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 29.2% 35 Very Good 30.0% 36 Satisfactory 15.8% 19 Needs Improvement 11.7% 14 No Opinion 13.3% 16

Yahaira Quezada 110 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 19.1% 21 Very Good 17.3% 19 Excellent 20.9% 23 Satisfactory 13.6% 15 Very Good 19.1% 21 Needs Improvement 32.7% 36 Satisfactory 10.9% 12 No Opinion 17.3% 19 Needs Improvement 34.5% 38 No Opinion 14.5% 16 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 22.7% 25 Very Good 17.3% 19 Excellent 22.7% 25 Satisfactory 16.4% 18 Very Good 21.8% 24 Needs Improvement 25.5% 28 Satisfactory 11.8% 13 No Opinion 18.2% 20 Needs Improvement 28.2% 31 No Opinion 15.5% 17 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 18.2% 20 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 19.1% 21 Excellent 20.9% 23 Satisfactory 17.3% 19 Very Good 15.5% 17 Needs Improvement 30.0% 33 Satisfactory 14.5% 16 No Opinion 15.5% 17

Needs Improvement 33.6% 37 No Opinion 15.5% 17

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 20.0% 22 Very Good 17.3% 19 Satisfactory 14.5% 16 Needs Improvement 30.0% 33 No Opinion 18.2% 20

Ryan Salfiti 115 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 22.6% 26 Very Good 19.1% 22 Excellent 18.3% 21 Satisfactory 19.1% 22 Very Good 25.2% 29 Needs Improvement 22.6% 26 Satisfactory 16.5% 19 No Opinion 16.5% 19 Needs Improvement 24.3% 28 No Opinion 15.7% 18 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 26.1% 30 Very Good 22.6% 26 Excellent 22.6% 26 Satisfactory 13.9% 16 Very Good 23.5% 27 Needs Improvement 19.1% 22 Satisfactory 15.7% 18 No Opinion 18.3% 21 Needs Improvement 21.7% 25 No Opinion 16.5% 19 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 19.1% 22 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 26.1% 30 Excellent 21.7% 25 Satisfactory 14.8% 17 Very Good 14.8% 17 Needs Improvement 23.5% 27 Satisfactory 14.8% 17 No Opinion 16.5% 19

Needs Improvement 30.4% 35 No Opinion 18.3% 21

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 23.5% 27 Very Good 21.7% 25 Satisfactory 12.2% 14 Needs Improvement 27.0% 31 No Opinion 15.7% 18

Associate Judges, Juvenile District Courts Eric Andell 186 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 47.8% 89 Very Good 13.4% 25 Excellent 52.7% 98 Satisfactory 8.6% 16 Very Good 15.6% 29 Needs Improvement 12.9% 24 Satisfactory 8.1% 15 No Opinion 17.2% 32 Needs Improvement 11.3% 21 No Opinion 12.4% 23 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 50.5% 94 Very Good 14.0% 26 Excellent 49.5% 92 Satisfactory 10.2% 19 Very Good 17.7% 33 Needs Improvement 10.2% 19 Satisfactory 9.1% 17 No Opinion 15.1% 28 Needs Improvement 9.7% 18 No Opinion 14.0% 26 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 51.1% 95 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 14.0% 26 Excellent 54.3% 101 Satisfactory 11.3% 21 Very Good 12.9% 24 Needs Improvement 11.3% 21 Satisfactory 9.1% 17 No Opinion 12.4% 23

Needs Improvement 8.1% 15 No Opinion 15.6% 29

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 48.4% 90 Very Good 15.6% 29 Satisfactory 9.7% 18 Needs Improvement 11.3% 21 No Opinion 15.1% 28

Dena Fisher 80 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 45.0% 36 Very Good 13.8% 11 Excellent 43.8% 35 Satisfactory 8.8% 7 Very Good 15.0% 12 Needs Improvement 13.8% 11 Satisfactory 11.3% 9 No Opinion 18.8% 15 Needs Improvement 11.3% 9 No Opinion 18.8% 15 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 45.0% 36 Very Good 18.8% 15 Excellent 48.8% 39 Satisfactory 7.5% 6 Very Good 11.3% 9 Needs Improvement 8.8% 7 Satisfactory 12.5% 10 No Opinion 20.0% 16 Needs Improvement 10.0% 8 No Opinion 17.5% 14 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 43.8% 35 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 18.8% 15 Excellent 47.5% 38 Satisfactory 6.3% 5 Very Good 16.3% 13 Needs Improvement 12.5% 10 Satisfactory 6.3% 5 No Opinion 18.8% 15

Needs Improvement 11.3% 9 No Opinion 18.8% 15

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 43.8% 35 Very Good 16.3% 13 Satisfactory 8.8% 7 Needs Improvement 13.8% 11 No Opinion 17.5% 14

William Thursland 64 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 31.3% 20 Very Good 15.6% 10 Excellent 37.5% 24 Satisfactory 10.9% 7 Very Good 20.3% 13 Needs Improvement 21.9% 14 Satisfactory 9.4% 6 No Opinion 20.3% 13 Needs Improvement 18.8% 12 No Opinion 14.1% 9 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 37.5% 24 Very Good 14.1% 9 Excellent 35.9% 23 Satisfactory 14.1% 9 Very Good 18.8% 12 Needs Improvement 15.6% 10 Satisfactory 10.9% 7 No Opinion 18.8% 12 Needs Improvement 18.8% 12 No Opinion 15.6% 10 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 32.8% 21 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 17.2% 11 Excellent 35.9% 23 Satisfactory 15.6% 10 Very Good 15.6% 10 Needs Improvement 20.3% 13 Satisfactory 9.4% 6 No Opinion 14.1% 9

Needs Improvement 20.3% 13 No Opinion 18.8% 12

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 32.8% 21 Very Good 10.9% 7 Satisfactory 12.5% 8 Needs Improvement 25.0% 16 No Opinion 18.8% 12

Associate Judges, IV-D Courts David Longoria 95 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 32.6% 31 Very Good 21.1% 20 Excellent 35.8% 34 Satisfactory 13.7% 13 Very Good 23.2% 22 Needs Improvement 9.5% 9 Satisfactory 11.6% 11 No Opinion 23.2% 22 Needs Improvement 7.4% 7 No Opinion 22.1% 21 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 32.6% 31 Very Good 21.1% 20 Excellent 38.9% 37 Satisfactory 13.7% 13 Very Good 22.1% 21 Needs Improvement 7.4% 7 Satisfactory 8.4% 8 No Opinion 25.3% 24 Needs Improvement 7.4% 7 No Opinion 23.2% 22 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 34.7% 33 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 26.3% 25 Excellent 38.9% 37 Satisfactory 11.6% 11 Very Good 21.1% 20 Needs Improvement 8.4% 8 Satisfactory 10.5% 10 No Opinion 18.9% 18

Needs Improvement 7.4% 7 No Opinion 22.1% 21

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 35.8% 34 Very Good 21.1% 20 Satisfactory 7.4% 7 Needs Improvement 10.5% 10 No Opinion 25.3% 24

Conrad Moren 101 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 60.4% 61 Very Good 16.8% 17 Excellent 73.3% 74 Satisfactory 6.9% 7 Very Good 13.9% 14 Needs Improvement 7.9% 8 Satisfactory 6.9% 7 No Opinion 7.9% 8 Needs Improvement 2.0% 2 No Opinion 4.0% 4 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 66.3% 67 Very Good 17.8% 18 Excellent 69.3% 70 Satisfactory 5.0% 5 Very Good 17.8% 18 Needs Improvement 4.0% 4 Satisfactory 5.0% 5 No Opinion 6.9% 7 Needs Improvement 2.0% 2 No Opinion 5.9% 6 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 66.3% 67 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 14.9% 15 Excellent 60.4% 61 Satisfactory 9.9% 10 Very Good 15.8% 16 Needs Improvement 4.0% 4 Satisfactory 5.0% 5 No Opinion 5.0% 5

Needs Improvement 12.9% 13 No Opinion 5.9% 6

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 60.4% 61 Very Good 14.9% 15 Satisfactory 7.9% 8 Needs Improvement 6.9% 7 No Opinion 9.9% 10

Veronica Torrez 82 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 31.7% 26 Very Good 19.5% 16 Excellent 35.4% 29 Satisfactory 15.9% 13 Very Good 25.6% 21 Needs Improvement 14.6% 12 Satisfactory 15.9% 13 No Opinion 18.3% 15 Needs Improvement 7.3% 6 No Opinion 15.9% 13 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 35.4% 29 Very Good 24.4% 20 Excellent 37.8% 31 Satisfactory 12.2% 10 Very Good 28.0% 23 Needs Improvement 8.5% 7 Satisfactory 11.0% 9 No Opinion 19.5% 16 Needs Improvement 8.5% 7 No Opinion 14.6% 12 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 34.1% 28 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 25.6% 21 Excellent 35.4% 29 Satisfactory 17.1% 14 Very Good 28.0% 23 Needs Improvement 6.1% 5 Satisfactory 13.4% 11 No Opinion 17.1% 14

Needs Improvement 7.3% 6 No Opinion 15.9% 13

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 32.9% 27 Very Good 26.8% 22 Satisfactory 15.9% 13 Needs Improvement 8.5% 7 No Opinion 15.9% 13

Gregory R. Wettman 83 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 34.9% 29 Very Good 24.1% 20 Excellent 42.2% 35 Satisfactory 10.8% 9 Very Good 28.9% 24 Needs Improvement 10.8% 9 Satisfactory 8.4% 7 No Opinion 19.3% 16 Needs Improvement 6.0% 5 No Opinion 14.5% 12 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 37.3% 31 Very Good 26.5% 22 Excellent 43.4% 36 Satisfactory 12.0% 10 Very Good 25.3% 21 Needs Improvement 8.4% 7 Satisfactory 9.6% 8 No Opinion 15.7% 13 Needs Improvement 6.0% 5 No Opinion 15.7% 13 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 37.3% 31 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 27.7% 23 Excellent 38.6% 32 Satisfactory 14.5% 12 Very Good 24.1% 20 Needs Improvement 8.4% 7 Satisfactory 9.6% 8 No Opinion 12.0% 10

Needs Improvement 9.6% 8 No Opinion 18.1% 15

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 37.3% 31 Very Good 28.9% 24 Satisfactory 7.2% 6 Needs Improvement 9.6% 8 No Opinion 16.9% 14

Associate Judges, Probate Courts Clarinda Comstock 105 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 61.9% 65 Very Good 21.0% 22 Excellent 61.0% 64 Satisfactory 4.8% 5 Very Good 21.9% 23 Needs Improvement 3.8% 4 Satisfactory 4.8% 5 No Opinion 8.6% 9 Needs Improvement 3.8% 4 No Opinion 8.6% 9 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 63.8% 67 Very Good 19.0% 20 Excellent 55.2% 58 Satisfactory 3.8% 4 Very Good 21.9% 23 Needs Improvement 3.8% 4 Satisfactory 7.6% 8 No Opinion 9.5% 10 Needs Improvement 3.8% 4 No Opinion 11.4% 12 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 61.0% 64 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 21.0% 22 Excellent 71.4% 75 Satisfactory 4.8% 5 Very Good 10.5% 11 Needs Improvement 3.8% 4 Satisfactory 2.9% 3 No Opinion 9.5% 10

Needs Improvement 4.8% 5 No Opinion 10.5% 11

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 59.0% 62 Very Good 19.0% 20 Satisfactory 5.7% 6 Needs Improvement 2.9% 3 No Opinion 13.3% 14

Amy R. Parsons 108 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 49.1% 53 Very Good 17.6% 19 Excellent 53.7% 58 Satisfactory 8.3% 9 Very Good 17.6% 19 Needs Improvement 11.1% 12 Satisfactory 13.9% 15 No Opinion 13.9% 15 Needs Improvement 4.6% 5 No Opinion 10.2% 11 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 52.8% 57 Very Good 19.4% 21 Excellent 48.1% 52 Satisfactory 10.2% 11 Very Good 20.4% 22 Needs Improvement 6.5% 7 Satisfactory 10.2% 11 No Opinion 11.1% 12 Needs Improvement 7.4% 8 No Opinion 13.9% 15 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 50.0% 54 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 19.4% 21 Excellent 46.3% 50 Satisfactory 11.1% 12 Very Good 16.7% 18 Needs Improvement 5.6% 6 Satisfactory 15.7% 17 No Opinion 13.9% 15

Needs Improvement 8.3% 9 No Opinion 13.0% 14

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 49.1% 53 Very Good 13.0% 14 Satisfactory 13.9% 15 Needs Improvement 7.4% 8 No Opinion 16.7% 18

Susie Rowley 95 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 36.8% 35 Very Good 24.2% 23 Excellent 36.8% 35 Satisfactory 8.4% 8 Very Good 26.3% 25 Needs Improvement 8.4% 8 Satisfactory 9.5% 9 No Opinion 22.1% 21 Needs Improvement 6.3% 6 No Opinion 21.1% 20 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 42.1% 40 Very Good 21.1% 20 Excellent 33.7% 32 Satisfactory 6.3% 6 Very Good 21.1% 20 Needs Improvement 6.3% 6 Satisfactory 7.4% 7 No Opinion 24.2% 23 Needs Improvement 7.4% 7 No Opinion 30.5% 29 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 38.9% 37 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 24.2% 23 Excellent 42.1% 40 Satisfactory 9.5% 9 Very Good 22.1% 21 Needs Improvement 6.3% 6 Satisfactory 6.3% 6 No Opinion 21.1% 20

Needs Improvement 8.4% 8 No Opinion 21.1% 20

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 45.3% 43 Very Good 20.0% 19 Satisfactory 7.4% 7 Needs Improvement 6.3% 6 No Opinion 21.1% 20

Ruth Ann Stiles 135 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 64.4% 87 Very Good 14.1% 19 Excellent 68.9% 93 Satisfactory 3.7% 5 Very Good 12.6% 17 Needs Improvement 3.7% 5 Satisfactory 1.5% 2 No Opinion 14.1% 19 Needs Improvement 4.4% 6 No Opinion 12.6% 17 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 67.4% 91 Very Good 12.6% 17 Excellent 64.4% 87 Satisfactory 3.7% 5 Very Good 12.6% 17 Needs Improvement 3.0% 4 Satisfactory 3.0% 4 No Opinion 13.3% 18 Needs Improvement 3.0% 4 No Opinion 17.0% 23 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 68.9% 93 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 11.1% 15 Excellent 67.4% 91 Satisfactory 3.7% 5 Very Good 12.6% 17 Needs Improvement 3.7% 5 Satisfactory 1.5% 2 No Opinion 12.6% 17

Needs Improvement 4.4% 6 No Opinion 14.1% 19

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 62.2% 84 Very Good 16.3% 22 Satisfactory 1.5% 2 Needs Improvement 5.2% 7 No Opinion 14.8% 20

Harris County Civil Courts at Law George Barnstone 227 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 19.8% 45 Very Good 10.6% 24 Excellent 18.5% 42 Satisfactory 11.5% 26 Very Good 10.1% 23 Needs Improvement 45.4% 103 Satisfactory 8.4% 19 No Opinion 12.8% 29 Needs Improvement 54.2% 123 No Opinion 8.8% 20 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 22.9% 52 Very Good 8.8% 20 Excellent 23.8% 54 Satisfactory 13.7% 31 Very Good 11.0% 25 Needs Improvement 43.6% 99 Satisfactory 13.2% 30 No Opinion 11.0% 25 Needs Improvement 41.9% 95 No Opinion 10.1% 23 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 20.7% 47 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 11.0% 25 Excellent 26.9% 61 Satisfactory 7.9% 18 Very Good 8.8% 20 Needs Improvement 50.7% 115 Satisfactory 9.7% 22 No Opinion 9.7% 22

Needs Improvement 43.6% 99 No Opinion 11.0% 25

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 21.1% 48 Very Good 8.4% 19 Satisfactory 9.7% 22 Needs Improvement 49.8% 113 No Opinion 11.0% 25

Lesley Briones 148 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 52.7% 78 Very Good 11.5% 17 Excellent 53.4% 79 Satisfactory 5.4% 8 Very Good 10.8% 16 Needs Improvement 14.2% 21 Satisfactory 5.4% 8 No Opinion 16.2% 24 Needs Improvement 16.9% 25 No Opinion 13.5% 20 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 54.7% 81 Very Good 10.8% 16 Excellent 54.1% 80 Satisfactory 6.1% 9 Very Good 10.8% 16 Needs Improvement 13.5% 20 Satisfactory 6.8% 10 No Opinion 14.9% 22 Needs Improvement 15.5% 23 No Opinion 12.8% 19 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 53.4% 79 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 11.5% 17 Excellent 55.4% 82 Satisfactory 8.8% 13 Very Good 10.1% 15 Needs Improvement 13.5% 20 Satisfactory 6.1% 9 No Opinion 12.8% 19

Needs Improvement 13.5% 20 No Opinion 14.9% 22

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 50.7% 75 Very Good 9.5% 14 Satisfactory 8.8% 13 Needs Improvement 14.2% 21 No Opinion 16.9% 25

Jim F. Kovach 171 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 47.4% 81 Very Good 18.1% 31 Excellent 50.9% 87 Satisfactory 8.2% 14 Very Good 17.0% 29 Needs Improvement 9.4% 16 Satisfactory 8.8% 15 No Opinion 17.0% 29 Needs Improvement 11.1% 19 No Opinion 12.3% 21 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 52.0% 89 Very Good 17.5% 30 Excellent 52.6% 90 Satisfactory 7.6% 13 Very Good 16.4% 28 Needs Improvement 8.8% 15 Satisfactory 8.8% 15 No Opinion 14.0% 24 Needs Improvement 8.8% 15 No Opinion 13.5% 23 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 49.7% 85 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 18.1% 31 Excellent 50.9% 87 Satisfactory 10.5% 18 Very Good 17.5% 30 Needs Improvement 9.9% 17 Satisfactory 8.8% 15 No Opinion 11.7% 20

Needs Improvement 8.2% 14 No Opinion 14.6% 25

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 46.8% 80 Very Good 18.7% 32 Satisfactory 9.4% 16 Needs Improvement 9.4% 16 No Opinion 15.8% 27

LaShawn A. Williams 141 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 40.4% 57 Very Good 10.6% 15 Excellent 36.9% 52 Satisfactory 11.3% 16 Very Good 12.8% 18 Needs Improvement 19.1% 27 Satisfactory 12.1% 17 No Opinion 18.4% 26 Needs Improvement 22.0% 31 No Opinion 16.3% 23 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 39.0% 55 Very Good 12.8% 18 Excellent 39.7% 56 Satisfactory 11.3% 16 Very Good 13.5% 19 Needs Improvement 18.4% 26 Satisfactory 10.6% 15 No Opinion 18.4% 26 Needs Improvement 19.1% 27 No Opinion 17.0% 24 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 37.6% 53 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 15.6% 22 Excellent 45.4% 64 Satisfactory 9.2% 13 Very Good 12.1% 17 Needs Improvement 20.6% 29 Satisfactory 9.9% 14 No Opinion 17.0% 24

Needs Improvement 16.3% 23 No Opinion 16.3% 23

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 40.4% 57 Very Good 10.6% 15 Satisfactory 13.5% 19 Needs Improvement 15.6% 22 No Opinion 19.9% 28

Harris County Criminal Courts at Law Kelley Andrews 80 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 36.3% 29 Very Good 20.0% 16 Excellent 35.0% 28 Satisfactory 11.3% 9 Very Good 23.8% 19 Needs Improvement 17.5% 14 Satisfactory 11.3% 9 No Opinion 15.0% 12 Needs Improvement 15.0% 12 No Opinion 15.0% 12 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 36.3% 29 Very Good 21.3% 17 Excellent 36.3% 29 Satisfactory 11.3% 9 Very Good 22.5% 18 Needs Improvement 16.3% 13 Satisfactory 8.8% 7 No Opinion 15.0% 12 Needs Improvement 17.5% 14 No Opinion 15.0% 12 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 36.3% 29 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 22.5% 18 Excellent 40.0% 32 Satisfactory 12.5% 10 Very Good 21.3% 17 Needs Improvement 15.0% 12 Satisfactory 11.3% 9 No Opinion 13.8% 11

Needs Improvement 13.8% 11 No Opinion 13.8% 11

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 33.8% 27 Very Good 21.3% 17 Satisfactory 11.3% 9 Needs Improvement 17.5% 14 No Opinion 16.3% 13

Shannon Baldwin 82 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 46.3% 38 Very Good 7.3% 6 Excellent 42.7% 35 Satisfactory 7.3% 6 Very Good 12.2% 10 Needs Improvement 26.8% 22 Satisfactory 9.8% 8 No Opinion 12.2% 10 Needs Improvement 25.6% 21 No Opinion 9.8% 8 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 43.9% 36 Very Good 9.8% 8 Excellent 47.6% 39 Satisfactory 8.5% 7 Very Good 8.5% 7 Needs Improvement 26.8% 22 Satisfactory 7.3% 6 No Opinion 11.0% 9 Needs Improvement 26.8% 22 No Opinion 9.8% 8 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 45.1% 37 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 9.8% 8 Excellent 46.3% 38 Satisfactory 9.8% 8 Very Good 13.4% 11 Needs Improvement 25.6% 21 Satisfactory 8.5% 7 No Opinion 9.8% 8

Needs Improvement 22.0% 18 No Opinion 9.8% 8

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 43.9% 36 Very Good 8.5% 7 Satisfactory 3.7% 3 Needs Improvement 29.3% 24 No Opinion 14.6% 12

Ronnisha Bowman 70 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 31.4% 22 Very Good 11.4% 8 Excellent 30.0% 21 Satisfactory 10.0% 7 Very Good 11.4% 8 Needs Improvement 32.9% 23 Satisfactory 8.6% 6 No Opinion 14.3% 10 Needs Improvement 37.1% 26 No Opinion 12.9% 9 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 30.0% 21 Very Good 11.4% 8 Excellent 30.0% 21 Satisfactory 10.0% 7 Very Good 11.4% 8 Needs Improvement 37.1% 26 Satisfactory 8.6% 6 No Opinion 11.4% 8 Needs Improvement 37.1% 26 No Opinion 12.9% 9 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 32.9% 23 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 10.0% 7 Excellent 32.9% 23 Satisfactory 10.0% 7 Very Good 11.4% 8 Needs Improvement 35.7% 25 Satisfactory 11.4% 8 No Opinion 11.4% 8

Needs Improvement 31.4% 22 No Opinion 12.9% 9

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 31.4% 22 Very Good 11.4% 8 Satisfactory 10.0% 7 Needs Improvement 35.7% 25 No Opinion 11.4% 8

Franklin Bynum 87 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 23.0% 20 Very Good 9.2% 8 Excellent 21.8% 19 Satisfactory 10.3% 9 Very Good 10.3% 9 Needs Improvement 42.5% 37 Satisfactory 6.9% 6 No Opinion 14.9% 13 Needs Improvement 50.6% 44 No Opinion 10.3% 9 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 24.1% 21 Very Good 8.0% 7 Excellent 25.3% 22 Satisfactory 6.9% 6 Very Good 11.5% 10 Needs Improvement 47.1% 41 Satisfactory 6.9% 6 No Opinion 13.8% 12 Needs Improvement 44.8% 39 No Opinion 11.5% 10 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 24.1% 21 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 8.0% 7 Excellent 23.0% 20 Satisfactory 8.0% 7 Very Good 8.0% 7 Needs Improvement 50.6% 44 Satisfactory 11.5% 10 No Opinion 9.2% 8

Needs Improvement 43.7% 38 No Opinion 13.8% 12

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 19.5% 17 Very Good 8.0% 7 Satisfactory 6.9% 6 Needs Improvement 51.7% 45 No Opinion 13.8% 12

Genesis E. Draper 80 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 46.3% 37 Very Good 8.8% 7 Excellent 46.3% 37 Satisfactory 11.3% 9 Very Good 11.3% 9 Needs Improvement 26.3% 21 Satisfactory 7.5% 6 No Opinion 7.5% 6 Needs Improvement 30.0% 24 No Opinion 5.0% 4 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 46.3% 37 Very Good 10.0% 8 Excellent 43.8% 35 Satisfactory 8.8% 7 Very Good 12.5% 10 Needs Improvement 28.8% 23 Satisfactory 10.0% 8 No Opinion 6.3% 5 Needs Improvement 27.5% 22 No Opinion 6.3% 5 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 46.3% 37 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 12.5% 10 Excellent 47.5% 38 Satisfactory 6.3% 5 Very Good 11.3% 9 Needs Improvement 28.8% 23 Satisfactory 8.8% 7 No Opinion 6.3% 5

Needs Improvement 27.5% 22 No Opinion 5.0% 4

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 45.0% 36 Very Good 11.3% 9 Satisfactory 7.5% 6 Needs Improvement 30.0% 24 No Opinion 6.3% 5

Toria J. Finch 85 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 44.7% 38 Very Good 8.2% 7 Excellent 45.9% 39 Satisfactory 10.6% 9 Very Good 9.4% 8 Needs Improvement 21.2% 18 Satisfactory 5.9% 5 No Opinion 15.3% 13 Needs Improvement 23.5% 20 No Opinion 15.3% 13 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 43.5% 37 Very Good 10.6% 9 Excellent 42.4% 36 Satisfactory 7.1% 6 Very Good 10.6% 9 Needs Improvement 21.2% 18 Satisfactory 8.2% 7 No Opinion 17.6% 15 Needs Improvement 22.4% 19 No Opinion 16.5% 14 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 43.5% 37 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 11.8% 10 Excellent 47.1% 40 Satisfactory 8.2% 7 Very Good 11.8% 10 Needs Improvement 21.2% 18 Satisfactory 5.9% 5 No Opinion 15.3% 13

Needs Improvement 21.2% 18 No Opinion 14.1% 12

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 41.2% 35 Very Good 10.6% 9 Satisfactory 7.1% 6 Needs Improvement 23.5% 20 No Opinion 17.6% 15

David M. Fleischer 82 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 39.0% 32 Very Good 13.4% 11 Excellent 39.0% 32 Satisfactory 12.2% 10 Very Good 15.9% 13 Needs Improvement 20.7% 17 Satisfactory 9.8% 8 No Opinion 14.6% 12 Needs Improvement 22.0% 18 No Opinion 13.4% 11 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 37.8% 31 Very Good 17.1% 14 Excellent 37.8% 31 Satisfactory 8.5% 7 Very Good 13.4% 11 Needs Improvement 22.0% 18 Satisfactory 12.2% 10 No Opinion 14.6% 12 Needs Improvement 20.7% 17 No Opinion 15.9% 13 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 37.8% 31 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 17.1% 14 Excellent 40.2% 33 Satisfactory 11.0% 9 Very Good 14.6% 12 Needs Improvement 22.0% 18 Satisfactory 11.0% 9 No Opinion 12.2% 10

Needs Improvement 18.3% 15 No Opinion 15.9% 13

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 37.8% 31 Very Good 15.9% 13 Satisfactory 7.3% 6 Needs Improvement 22.0% 18 No Opinion 17.1% 14

Erica Hughes 74 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 33.8% 25 Very Good 13.5% 10 Excellent 36.5% 27 Satisfactory 8.1% 6 Very Good 9.5% 7 Needs Improvement 32.4% 24 Satisfactory 5.4% 4 No Opinion 12.2% 9 Needs Improvement 35.1% 26 No Opinion 13.5% 10 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 36.5% 27 Very Good 10.8% 8 Excellent 36.5% 27 Satisfactory 6.8% 5 Very Good 9.5% 7 Needs Improvement 32.4% 24 Satisfactory 5.4% 4 No Opinion 13.5% 10 Needs Improvement 32.4% 24 No Opinion 16.2% 12 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 33.8% 25 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 13.5% 10 Excellent 35.1% 26 Satisfactory 9.5% 7 Very Good 9.5% 7 Needs Improvement 32.4% 24 Satisfactory 8.1% 6 No Opinion 10.8% 8

Needs Improvement 33.8% 25 No Opinion 13.5% 10

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 35.1% 26 Very Good 8.1% 6 Satisfactory 8.1% 6 Needs Improvement 36.5% 27 No Opinion 12.2% 9

Tonya Jones 70 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 27.1% 19 Very Good 10.0% 7 Excellent 30.0% 21 Satisfactory 12.9% 9 Very Good 7.1% 5 Needs Improvement 31.4% 22 Satisfactory 8.6% 6 No Opinion 18.6% 13 Needs Improvement 35.7% 25 No Opinion 18.6% 13 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 30.0% 21 Very Good 8.6% 6 Excellent 28.6% 20 Satisfactory 12.9% 9 Very Good 10.0% 7 Needs Improvement 31.4% 22 Satisfactory 11.4% 8 No Opinion 17.1% 12 Needs Improvement 32.9% 23 No Opinion 17.1% 12 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 30.0% 21 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 8.6% 6 Excellent 31.4% 22 Satisfactory 12.9% 9 Very Good 10.0% 7 Needs Improvement 31.4% 22 Satisfactory 11.4% 8 No Opinion 17.1% 12

Needs Improvement 30.0% 21 No Opinion 17.1% 12

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 27.1% 19 Very Good 12.9% 9 Satisfactory 8.6% 6 Needs Improvement 34.3% 24 No Opinion 17.1% 12

Darrell Jordan 103 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 32.0% 33 Very Good 4.9% 5 Excellent 34.0% 35 Satisfactory 5.8% 6 Very Good 6.8% 7 Needs Improvement 47.6% 49 Satisfactory 2.9% 3 No Opinion 9.7% 10 Needs Improvement 47.6% 49 No Opinion 8.7% 9 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 35.0% 36 Very Good 4.9% 5 Excellent 35.9% 37 Satisfactory 3.9% 4 Very Good 7.8% 8 Needs Improvement 44.7% 46 Satisfactory 2.9% 3 No Opinion 11.7% 12 Needs Improvement 43.7% 45 No Opinion 9.7% 10 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 32.0% 33 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 7.8% 8 Excellent 34.0% 35 Satisfactory 1.9% 2 Very Good 5.8% 6 Needs Improvement 49.5% 51 Satisfactory 2.9% 3 No Opinion 8.7% 9

Needs Improvement 47.6% 49 No Opinion 9.7% 10

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 30.1% 31 Very Good 5.8% 6 Satisfactory 3.9% 4 Needs Improvement 50.5% 52 No Opinion 9.7% 10

Raul Rodriguez 104 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 54.8% 57 Very Good 16.3% 17 Excellent 59.6% 62 Satisfactory 5.8% 6 Very Good 14.4% 15 Needs Improvement 13.5% 14 Satisfactory 2.9% 3 No Opinion 9.6% 10 Needs Improvement 16.3% 17 No Opinion 6.7% 7 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 59.6% 62 Very Good 13.5% 14 Excellent 55.8% 58 Satisfactory 3.8% 4 Very Good 16.3% 17 Needs Improvement 16.3% 17 Satisfactory 4.8% 5 No Opinion 6.7% 7 Needs Improvement 16.3% 17 No Opinion 6.7% 7 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 58.7% 61 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 14.4% 15 Excellent 61.5% 64 Satisfactory 4.8% 5 Very Good 15.4% 16 Needs Improvement 15.4% 16 Satisfactory 3.8% 4 No Opinion 6.7% 7

Needs Improvement 13.5% 14 No Opinion 5.8% 6

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 58.7% 61 Very Good 12.5% 13 Satisfactory 2.9% 3 Needs Improvement 17.3% 18 No Opinion 8.7% 9

Alex Salgado 67 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 34.3% 23 Very Good 14.9% 10 Excellent 32.8% 22 Satisfactory 7.5% 5 Very Good 14.9% 10 Needs Improvement 26.9% 18 Satisfactory 7.5% 5 No Opinion 16.4% 11 Needs Improvement 26.9% 18 No Opinion 17.9% 12 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 32.8% 22 Very Good 17.9% 12 Excellent 31.3% 21 Satisfactory 6.0% 4 Very Good 13.4% 9 Needs Improvement 26.9% 18 Satisfactory 7.5% 5 No Opinion 16.4% 11 Needs Improvement 26.9% 18 No Opinion 20.9% 14 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 34.3% 23 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 16.4% 11 Excellent 34.3% 23 Satisfactory 6.0% 4 Very Good 14.9% 10 Needs Improvement 28.4% 19 Satisfactory 6.0% 4 No Opinion 14.9% 10

Needs Improvement 26.9% 18 No Opinion 17.9% 12

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 35.8% 24 Very Good 11.9% 8 Satisfactory 6.0% 4 Needs Improvement 26.9% 18 No Opinion 19.4% 13

David L. Singer 73 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 30.1% 22 Very Good 15.1% 11 Excellent 32.9% 24 Satisfactory 13.7% 10 Very Good 16.4% 12 Needs Improvement 23.3% 17 Satisfactory 9.6% 7 No Opinion 17.8% 13 Needs Improvement 24.7% 18 No Opinion 16.4% 12 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 32.9% 24 Very Good 13.7% 10 Excellent 32.9% 24 Satisfactory 12.3% 9 Very Good 15.1% 11 Needs Improvement 24.7% 18 Satisfactory 12.3% 9 No Opinion 16.4% 12 Needs Improvement 23.3% 17 No Opinion 16.4% 12 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 32.9% 24 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 13.7% 10 Excellent 26.0% 19 Satisfactory 15.1% 11 Very Good 13.7% 10 Needs Improvement 23.3% 17 Satisfactory 13.7% 10 No Opinion 15.1% 11

Needs Improvement 27.4% 20 No Opinion 19.2% 14

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 32.9% 24 Very Good 15.1% 11 Satisfactory 9.6% 7 Needs Improvement 24.7% 18 No Opinion 17.8% 13

Sedrick T. Walker II 71 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 38.0% 27 Very Good 11.3% 8 Excellent 38.0% 27 Satisfactory 5.6% 4 Very Good 8.5% 6 Needs Improvement 29.6% 21 Satisfactory 8.5% 6 No Opinion 15.5% 11 Needs Improvement 29.6% 21 No Opinion 15.5% 11 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 38.0% 27 Very Good 12.7% 9 Excellent 36.6% 26 Satisfactory 4.2% 3 Very Good 9.9% 7 Needs Improvement 29.6% 21 Satisfactory 9.9% 7 No Opinion 15.5% 11 Needs Improvement 26.8% 19 No Opinion 16.9% 12 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 38.0% 27 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 9.9% 7 Excellent 40.8% 29 Satisfactory 8.5% 6 Very Good 9.9% 7 Needs Improvement 26.8% 19 Satisfactory 7.0% 5 No Opinion 16.9% 12

Needs Improvement 28.2% 20 No Opinion 14.1% 10

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 35.2% 25 Very Good 8.5% 6 Satisfactory 5.6% 4 Needs Improvement 31.0% 22 No Opinion 19.7% 14

Lee Harper Wilson 76 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 13.2% 10 Very Good 6.6% 5 Excellent 15.8% 12 Satisfactory 7.9% 6 Very Good 6.6% 5 Needs Improvement 60.5% 46 Satisfactory 7.9% 6 No Opinion 11.8% 9 Needs Improvement 57.9% 44 No Opinion 11.8% 9 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 14.5% 11 Very Good 7.9% 6 Excellent 14.5% 11 Satisfactory 7.9% 6 Very Good 10.5% 8 Needs Improvement 57.9% 44 Satisfactory 6.6% 5 No Opinion 11.8% 9 Needs Improvement 56.6% 43 No Opinion 11.8% 9 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 13.2% 10 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 2.6% 2 Excellent 14.5% 11 Satisfactory 5.3% 4 Very Good 3.9% 3 Needs Improvement 68.4% 52 Satisfactory 3.9% 3 No Opinion 10.5% 8

Needs Improvement 67.1% 51 No Opinion 10.5% 8

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 14.5% 11 Very Good 3.9% 3 Satisfactory 9.2% 7 Needs Improvement 57.9% 44 No Opinion 14.5% 11

Andrew A. Wright 90 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 41.1% 37 Very Good 11.1% 10 Excellent 38.9% 35 Satisfactory 6.7% 6 Very Good 10.0% 9 Needs Improvement 34.4% 31 Satisfactory 8.9% 8 No Opinion 6.7% 6 Needs Improvement 36.7% 33 No Opinion 5.6% 5 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 42.2% 38 Very Good 7.8% 7 Excellent 43.3% 39 Satisfactory 10.0% 9 Very Good 10.0% 9 Needs Improvement 35.6% 32 Satisfactory 5.6% 5 No Opinion 4.4% 4 Needs Improvement 33.3% 30 No Opinion 7.8% 7 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 42.2% 38 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 10.0% 9 Excellent 40.0% 36 Satisfactory 6.7% 6 Very Good 11.1% 10 Needs Improvement 37.8% 34 Satisfactory 8.9% 8 No Opinion 3.3% 3

Needs Improvement 35.6% 32 No Opinion 4.4% 4

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 42.2% 38 Very Good 10.0% 9 Satisfactory 3.3% 3 Needs Improvement 38.9% 35

No Opinion 5.6% 5

Justice of the Peace Courts Lucia Bates 21 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 33.3% 7 Very Good 19.0% 4 Excellent 38.1% 8 Satisfactory 14.3% 3 Very Good 19.0% 4 Needs Improvement 14.3% 3 Satisfactory 9.5% 2 No Opinion 19.0% 4 Needs Improvement 19.0% 4 No Opinion 14.3% 3 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 38.1% 8 Very Good 14.3% 3 Excellent 38.1% 8 Satisfactory 19.0% 4 Very Good 14.3% 3 Needs Improvement 14.3% 3 Satisfactory 19.0% 4 No Opinion 14.3% 3 Needs Improvement 14.3% 3 No Opinion 14.3% 3 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 38.1% 8 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 14.3% 3 Excellent 42.9% 9 Satisfactory 19.0% 4 Very Good 23.8% 5 Needs Improvement 14.3% 3 Satisfactory 4.8% 1 No Opinion 14.3% 3

Needs Improvement 14.3% 3 No Opinion 14.3% 3

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 38.1% 8 Very Good 14.3% 3 Satisfactory 14.3% 3 Needs Improvement 14.3% 3 No Opinion 19.0% 4

Jeremy L. Brown 32 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 46.9% 15 Very Good 12.5% 4 Excellent 43.8% 14 Satisfactory 6.3% 2 Very Good 18.8% 6 Needs Improvement 15.6% 5 Satisfactory 6.3% 2 No Opinion 18.8% 6 Needs Improvement 18.8% 6 No Opinion 12.5% 4 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 46.9% 15 Very Good 15.6% 5 Excellent 46.9% 15 Satisfactory 3.1% 1 Very Good 15.6% 5 Needs Improvement 18.8% 6 Satisfactory 9.4% 3 No Opinion 15.6% 5 Needs Improvement 15.6% 5 No Opinion 12.5% 4 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 46.9% 15 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 15.6% 5 Excellent 50.0% 16 Satisfactory 6.3% 2 Very Good 18.8% 6 Needs Improvement 18.8% 6 Satisfactory 3.1% 1 No Opinion 12.5% 4

Needs Improvement 15.6% 5 No Opinion 12.5% 4

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 43.8% 14 Very Good 6.3% 2 Satisfactory 3.1% 1 Needs Improvement 21.9% 7 No Opinion 25.0% 8

Sharon M. Burney 43 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 48.8% 21 Very Good 14.0% 6 Excellent 55.8% 24 Satisfactory 9.3% 4 Very Good 14.0% 6 Needs Improvement 11.6% 5 Satisfactory 4.7% 2 No Opinion 16.3% 7 Needs Improvement 14.0% 6 No Opinion 11.6% 5 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 53.5% 23 Very Good 7.0% 3 Excellent 58.1% 25 Satisfactory 11.6% 5 Very Good 11.6% 5 Needs Improvement 14.0% 6 Satisfactory 4.7% 2 No Opinion 14.0% 6 Needs Improvement 14.0% 6 No Opinion 11.6% 5 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 53.5% 23 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 14.0% 6 Excellent 58.1% 25 Satisfactory 9.3% 4 Very Good 9.3% 4 Needs Improvement 14.0% 6 Satisfactory 7.0% 3 No Opinion 9.3% 4

Needs Improvement 14.0% 6 No Opinion 11.6% 5

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 51.2% 22 Very Good 16.3% 7 Satisfactory 4.7% 2 Needs Improvement 11.6% 5 No Opinion 16.3% 7

Eric William Carter 92 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 55.4% 51 Very Good 14.1% 13 Excellent 57.6% 53 Satisfactory 2.2% 2 Very Good 16.3% 15 Needs Improvement 9.8% 9 Satisfactory 1.1% 1 No Opinion 18.5% 17 Needs Improvement 8.7% 8 No Opinion 16.3% 15 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 55.4% 51 Very Good 16.3% 15 Excellent 57.6% 53 Satisfactory 2.2% 2 Very Good 15.2% 14 Needs Improvement 8.7% 8 Satisfactory 2.2% 2 No Opinion 17.4% 16 Needs Improvement 8.7% 8 No Opinion 16.3% 15 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 55.4% 51 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 17.4% 16 Excellent 59.8% 55 Satisfactory 2.2% 2 Very Good 13.0% 12 Needs Improvement 8.7% 8 Satisfactory 2.2% 2 No Opinion 16.3% 15

Needs Improvement 7.6% 7 No Opinion 17.4% 16

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 55.4% 51 Very Good 12.0% 11 Satisfactory 3.3% 3 Needs Improvement 7.6% 7 No Opinion 21.7% 20

Jo Ann Delgado 55 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 45.5% 25 Very Good 18.2% 10 Excellent 47.3% 26 Satisfactory 10.9% 6 Very Good 25.5% 14 Needs Improvement 7.3% 4 Satisfactory 3.6% 2 No Opinion 18.2% 10 Needs Improvement 5.5% 3 No Opinion 18.2% 10 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 49.1% 27 Very Good 18.2% 10 Excellent 45.5% 25 Satisfactory 7.3% 4 Very Good 23.6% 13 Needs Improvement 5.5% 3 Satisfactory 7.3% 4 No Opinion 20.0% 11 Needs Improvement 5.5% 3 No Opinion 18.2% 10 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 52.7% 29 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 18.2% 10 Excellent 47.3% 26 Satisfactory 9.1% 5 Very Good 21.8% 12 Needs Improvement 5.5% 3 Satisfactory 5.5% 3 No Opinion 14.5% 8

Needs Improvement 5.5% 3 No Opinion 20.0% 11

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 43.6% 24 Very Good 23.6% 13 Satisfactory 7.3% 4 Needs Improvement 5.5% 3 No Opinion 20.0% 11

Louie Ditta 57 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 45.6% 26 Very Good 22.8% 13 Excellent 45.6% 26 Satisfactory 8.8% 5 Very Good 22.8% 13 Needs Improvement 7.0% 4 Satisfactory 10.5% 6 No Opinion 15.8% 9 Needs Improvement 7.0% 4 No Opinion 14.0% 8 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 47.4% 27 Very Good 21.1% 12 Excellent 47.4% 27 Satisfactory 10.5% 6 Very Good 22.8% 13 Needs Improvement 7.0% 4 Satisfactory 8.8% 5 No Opinion 14.0% 8 Needs Improvement 7.0% 4 No Opinion 14.0% 8 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 43.9% 25 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 26.3% 15 Excellent 49.1% 28 Satisfactory 8.8% 5 Very Good 19.3% 11 Needs Improvement 7.0% 4 Satisfactory 10.5% 6 No Opinion 14.0% 8

Needs Improvement 7.0% 4 No Opinion 14.0% 8

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 40.4% 23 Very Good 22.8% 13 Satisfactory 8.8% 5 Needs Improvement 7.0% 4 No Opinion 21.1% 12

Lincoln Goodwin 60 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 55.0% 33 Very Good 20.0% 12 Excellent 56.7% 34 Satisfactory 6.7% 4 Very Good 18.3% 11 Needs Improvement 5.0% 3 Satisfactory 6.7% 4 No Opinion 13.3% 8 Needs Improvement 6.7% 4 No Opinion 11.7% 7 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 56.7% 34 Very Good 20.0% 12 Excellent 58.3% 35 Satisfactory 6.7% 4 Very Good 18.3% 11 Needs Improvement 3.3% 2 Satisfactory 3.3% 2 No Opinion 13.3% 8 Needs Improvement 6.7% 4 No Opinion 13.3% 8 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 58.3% 35 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 23.3% 14 Excellent 60.0% 36 Satisfactory 3.3% 2 Very Good 20.0% 12 Needs Improvement 6.7% 4 Satisfactory 1.7% 1 No Opinion 8.3% 5

Needs Improvement 5.0% 3 No Opinion 13.3% 8

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 56.7% 34 Very Good 15.0% 9 Satisfactory 5.0% 3 Needs Improvement 6.7% 4 No Opinion 16.7% 10

Laryssa Korduba 46 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 43.5% 20 Very Good 15.2% 7 Excellent 50.0% 23 Satisfactory 8.7% 4 Very Good 15.2% 7 Needs Improvement 23.9% 11 Satisfactory 4.3% 2 No Opinion 8.7% 4 Needs Improvement 19.6% 9 No Opinion 10.9% 5 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 43.5% 20 Very Good 19.6% 9 Excellent 52.2% 24 Satisfactory 8.7% 4 Very Good 17.4% 8 Needs Improvement 19.6% 9 Satisfactory 4.3% 2 No Opinion 8.7% 4 Needs Improvement 17.4% 8 No Opinion 8.7% 4 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 45.7% 21 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 21.7% 10 Excellent 39.1% 18 Satisfactory 2.2% 1 Very Good 19.6% 9 Needs Improvement 21.7% 10 Satisfactory 8.7% 4 No Opinion 8.7% 4

Needs Improvement 23.9% 11 No Opinion 8.7% 4

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 47.8% 22 Very Good 17.4% 8 Satisfactory 8.7% 4 Needs Improvement 17.4% 8 No Opinion 8.7% 4

David Patronella 211 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 55.5% 117 Very Good 19.0% 40 Excellent 60.7% 128 Satisfactory 5.2% 11 Very Good 19.0% 40 Needs Improvement 6.2% 13 Satisfactory 4.7% 10 No Opinion 14.2% 30 Needs Improvement 3.8% 8 No Opinion 11.8% 25 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 60.7% 128 Very Good 15.2% 32 Excellent 62.1% 131 Satisfactory 5.7% 12 Very Good 17.5% 37 Needs Improvement 3.8% 8 Satisfactory 3.8% 8 No Opinion 14.7% 31 Needs Improvement 4.3% 9 No Opinion 12.3% 26 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 60.2% 127 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 18.5% 39 Excellent 65.9% 139 Satisfactory 5.7% 12 Very Good 14.7% 31 Needs Improvement 3.3% 7 Satisfactory 3.3% 7 No Opinion 12.3% 26

Needs Improvement 3.3% 7 No Opinion 12.8% 27

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 61.1% 129 Very Good 17.5% 37 Satisfactory 3.8% 8 Needs Improvement 4.3% 9 No Opinion 13.3% 28

Russ Ridgway 115 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 29.6% 34 Very Good 18.3% 21 Excellent 33.0% 38 Satisfactory 14.8% 17 Very Good 20.0% 23 Needs Improvement 25.2% 29 Satisfactory 9.6% 11 No Opinion 12.2% 14 Needs Improvement 22.6% 26 No Opinion 14.8% 17 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 32.2% 37 Very Good 21.7% 25 Excellent 35.7% 41 Satisfactory 12.2% 14 Very Good 21.7% 25 Needs Improvement 19.1% 22 Satisfactory 7.8% 9 No Opinion 14.8% 17 Needs Improvement 22.6% 26 No Opinion 12.2% 14 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 31.3% 36 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 26.1% 30 Excellent 35.7% 41 Satisfactory 8.7% 10 Very Good 22.6% 26 Needs Improvement 24.3% 28 Satisfactory 8.7% 10 No Opinion 9.6% 11

Needs Improvement 20.0% 23 No Opinion 13.0% 15

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 33.9% 39 Very Good 22.6% 26 Satisfactory 7.0% 8 Needs Improvement 24.3% 28 No Opinion 12.2% 14

George Risner 63 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 38.1% 24 Very Good 11.1% 7 Excellent 38.1% 24 Satisfactory 14.3% 9 Very Good 19.0% 12 Needs Improvement 17.5% 11 Satisfactory 9.5% 6 No Opinion 19.0% 12 Needs Improvement 20.6% 13 No Opinion 12.7% 8 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 38.1% 24 Very Good 15.9% 10 Excellent 38.1% 24 Satisfactory 12.7% 8 Very Good 15.9% 10 Needs Improvement 17.5% 11 Satisfactory 17.5% 11 No Opinion 15.9% 10 Needs Improvement 14.3% 9 No Opinion 14.3% 9 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 38.1% 24 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 14.3% 9 Excellent 41.3% 26 Satisfactory 15.9% 10 Very Good 12.7% 8 Needs Improvement 19.0% 12 Satisfactory 14.3% 9 No Opinion 12.7% 8

Needs Improvement 14.3% 9 No Opinion 17.5% 11

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 41.3% 26 Very Good 12.7% 8 Satisfactory 12.7% 8 Needs Improvement 17.5% 11 No Opinion 15.9% 10

Angela D. Rodriguez 31 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 35.5% 11 Very Good 6.5% 2 Excellent 35.5% 11 Satisfactory 6.5% 2 Very Good 12.9% 4 Needs Improvement 29.0% 9 Satisfactory 6.5% 2 No Opinion 22.6% 7 Needs Improvement 22.6% 7 No Opinion 22.6% 7 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 32.3% 10 Very Good 9.7% 3 Excellent 32.3% 10 Satisfactory 6.5% 2 Very Good 12.9% 4 Needs Improvement 22.6% 7 Satisfactory 6.5% 2 No Opinion 29.0% 9 Needs Improvement 19.4% 6 No Opinion 29.0% 9 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 35.5% 11 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 9.7% 3 Excellent 35.5% 11 Satisfactory 9.7% 3 Very Good 16.1% 5 Needs Improvement 25.8% 8 Satisfactory 12.9% 4 No Opinion 19.4% 6

Needs Improvement 12.9% 4 No Opinion 22.6% 7

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 32.3% 10 Very Good 9.7% 3 Satisfactory 16.1% 5 Needs Improvement 16.1% 5 No Opinion 25.8% 8

Joe Stephens 35 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 60.0% 21 Very Good 5.7% 2 Excellent 60.0% 21 Satisfactory 2.9% 1 Very Good 5.7% 2 Needs Improvement 11.4% 4 Satisfactory 5.7% 2 No Opinion 20.0% 7 Needs Improvement 11.4% 4 No Opinion 17.1% 6 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 60.0% 21 Very Good 5.7% 2 Excellent 60.0% 21 Satisfactory 8.6% 3 Very Good 8.6% 3 Needs Improvement 8.6% 3 Satisfactory 2.9% 1 No Opinion 17.1% 6 Needs Improvement 11.4% 4 No Opinion 17.1% 6 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 60.0% 21 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 5.7% 2 Excellent 60.0% 21 Satisfactory 11.4% 4 Very Good 14.3% 5 Needs Improvement 5.7% 2 Satisfactory 2.9% 1 No Opinion 17.1% 6

Needs Improvement 5.7% 2 No Opinion 17.1% 6

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 60.0% 21 Very Good 5.7% 2 Satisfactory 8.6% 3 Needs Improvement 5.7% 2 No Opinion 20.0% 7

Richard Vara 50 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 38.0% 19 Very Good 24.0% 12 Excellent 44.0% 22 Satisfactory 8.0% 4 Very Good 22.0% 11 Needs Improvement 10.0% 5 Satisfactory 8.0% 4 No Opinion 20.0% 10 Needs Improvement 8.0% 4 No Opinion 18.0% 9 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 42.0% 21 Very Good 14.0% 7 Excellent 40.0% 20 Satisfactory 12.0% 6 Very Good 24.0% 12 Needs Improvement 8.0% 4 Satisfactory 10.0% 5 No Opinion 24.0% 12 Needs Improvement 4.0% 2 No Opinion 22.0% 11 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 42.0% 21 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 28.0% 14 Excellent 50.0% 25 Satisfactory 8.0% 4 Very Good 18.0% 9 Needs Improvement 8.0% 4 Satisfactory 6.0% 3 No Opinion 14.0% 7

Needs Improvement 8.0% 4 No Opinion 18.0% 9

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 42.0% 21 Very Good 22.0% 11 Satisfactory 10.0% 5 Needs Improvement 8.0% 4 No Opinion 18.0% 9

Jeff Williams 50 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 38.0% 19 Very Good 16.0% 8 Excellent 42.0% 21 Satisfactory 14.0% 7 Very Good 22.0% 11 Needs Improvement 12.0% 6 Satisfactory 6.0% 3 No Opinion 20.0% 10 Needs Improvement 14.0% 7 No Opinion 16.0% 8 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 38.0% 19 Very Good 16.0% 8 Excellent 46.0% 23 Satisfactory 12.0% 6 Very Good 18.0% 9 Needs Improvement 12.0% 6 Satisfactory 10.0% 5 No Opinion 22.0% 11 Needs Improvement 8.0% 4 No Opinion 18.0% 9 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 46.0% 23 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 20.0% 10 Excellent 44.0% 22 Satisfactory 6.0% 3 Very Good 16.0% 8 Needs Improvement 12.0% 6 Satisfactory 8.0% 4 No Opinion 16.0% 8

Needs Improvement 14.0% 7 No Opinion 18.0% 9

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 48.0% 24 Very Good 14.0% 7 Satisfactory 8.0% 4 Needs Improvement 8.0% 4 No Opinion 22.0% 11

Holly Williamson 62 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 40.3% 25 Very Good 17.7% 11 Excellent 43.5% 27 Satisfactory 9.7% 6 Very Good 14.5% 9 Needs Improvement 14.5% 9 Satisfactory 11.3% 7 No Opinion 17.7% 11 Needs Improvement 14.5% 9 No Opinion 16.1% 10 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 37.1% 23 Very Good 19.4% 12 Excellent 45.2% 28 Satisfactory 8.1% 5 Very Good 17.7% 11 Needs Improvement 16.1% 10 Satisfactory 6.5% 4 No Opinion 19.4% 12 Needs Improvement 11.3% 7 No Opinion 19.4% 12 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 38.7% 24 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 17.7% 11 Excellent 45.2% 28 Satisfactory 9.7% 6 Very Good 19.4% 12 Needs Improvement 16.1% 10 Satisfactory 8.1% 5 No Opinion 17.7% 11

Needs Improvement 12.9% 8 No Opinion 14.5% 9

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 38.7% 24 Very Good 19.4% 12 Satisfactory 8.1% 5 Needs Improvement 14.5% 9 No Opinion 19.4% 12

Houston Municipal Courts Mimi Berkowitz 14 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 42.9% 6 Very Good 21.4% 3 Excellent 42.9% 6 Satisfactory 14.3% 2 Very Good 21.4% 3 Needs Improvement 7.1% 1 Satisfactory 14.3% 2 No Opinion 14.3% 2 Needs Improvement 7.1% 1 No Opinion 14.3% 2 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 35.7% 5 Very Good 28.6% 4 Excellent 42.9% 6 Satisfactory 14.3% 2 Very Good 21.4% 3 Needs Improvement 7.1% 1 Satisfactory 14.3% 2 No Opinion 14.3% 2 Needs Improvement 7.1% 1 No Opinion 14.3% 2 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 42.9% 6 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 28.6% 4 Excellent 35.7% 5 Satisfactory 14.3% 2 Very Good 28.6% 4 Needs Improvement 7.1% 1 Satisfactory 14.3% 2 No Opinion 7.1% 1

Needs Improvement 7.1% 1 No Opinion 14.3% 2

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 35.7% 5 Very Good 28.6% 4 Satisfactory 7.1% 1 Needs Improvement 14.3% 2 No Opinion 14.3% 2

Imelda Castillo 18 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 33.3% 6 Very Good 11.1% 2 Excellent 27.8% 5 Satisfactory 11.1% 2 Very Good 16.7% 3 Needs Improvement 27.8% 5 Satisfactory 16.7% 3 No Opinion 16.7% 3 Needs Improvement 22.2% 4 Works hard and is No Opinion 16.7% 3 prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 33.3% 6 Excellent 33.3% 6 Very Good 11.1% 2 Very Good 5.6% 1 Satisfactory 16.7% 3 Satisfactory 16.7% 3 Needs Improvement 22.2% 4 Needs Improvement 22.2% 4 No Opinion 16.7% 3 No Opinion 22.2% 4 Is courteous and attentive toward Overall rating attorneys and witnesses Excellent 33.3% 6 Very Good 11.1% 2 Excellent 33.3% 6 Satisfactory 11.1% 2 Very Good 11.1% 2 Needs Improvement 27.8% 5 Satisfactory 11.1% 2 No Opinion 16.7% 3 Needs Improvement 33.3% 6

No Opinion 11.1% 2 Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 33.3% 6 Very Good 5.6% 1

Satisfactory 16.7% 3 Needs Improvement 27.8% 5 No Opinion 16.7% 3

Grant H. Coleman 15 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 46.7% 7 Very Good 20.0% 3 Excellent 60.0% 9 Satisfactory 6.7% 1 Very Good 13.3% 2 Needs Improvement 13.3% 2 Satisfactory 6.7% 1 No Opinion 13.3% 2 Needs Improvement 13.3% 2 No Opinion 6.7% 1 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 53.3% 8 Very Good 20.0% 3 Excellent 60.0% 9 Satisfactory 6.7% 1 Very Good 20.0% 3 Needs Improvement 13.3% 2 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 No Opinion 6.7% 1 Needs Improvement 6.7% 1 No Opinion 13.3% 2 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 53.3% 8 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 20.0% 3 Excellent 66.7% 10 Satisfactory 6.7% 1 Very Good 13.3% 2 Needs Improvement 13.3% 2 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 No Opinion 6.7% 1

Needs Improvement 13.3% 2 No Opinion 6.7% 1

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 60.0% 9 Very Good 20.0% 3 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Needs Improvement 13.3% 2 No Opinion 6.7% 1

Kim Edwards 11 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 9.1% 1 Very Good 27.3% 3 Excellent 9.1% 1 Satisfactory 18.2% 2 Very Good 27.3% 3 Needs Improvement 9.1% 1 Satisfactory 18.2% 2 No Opinion 36.4% 4 Needs Improvement 9.1% 1 No Opinion 36.4% 4 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 18.2% 2 Very Good 18.2% 2 Excellent 27.3% 3 Satisfactory 9.1% 1 Very Good 9.1% 1 Needs Improvement 9.1% 1 Satisfactory 18.2% 2 No Opinion 45.5% 5 Needs Improvement 9.1% 1 No Opinion 36.4% 4 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 9.1% 1 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 27.3% 3 Excellent 9.1% 1 Satisfactory 18.2% 2 Very Good 9.1% 1 Needs Improvement 9.1% 1 Satisfactory 27.3% 3 No Opinion 36.4% 4

Needs Improvement 18.2% 2 No Opinion 36.4% 4

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 9.1% 1 Very Good 18.2% 2 Satisfactory 27.3% 3 Needs Improvement 9.1% 1 No Opinion 36.4% 4

Sherilyn Edwards 26 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 50.0% 13 Very Good 11.5% 3 Excellent 53.8% 14 Satisfactory 11.5% 3 Very Good 11.5% 3 Needs Improvement 7.7% 2 Satisfactory 15.4% 4 No Opinion 19.2% 5 Needs Improvement 7.7% 2 No Opinion 11.5% 3 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 53.8% 14 Very Good 15.4% 4 Excellent 53.8% 14 Satisfactory 11.5% 3 Very Good 15.4% 4 Needs Improvement 7.7% 2 Satisfactory 11.5% 3 No Opinion 11.5% 3 Needs Improvement 7.7% 2 No Opinion 11.5% 3 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 53.8% 14 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 15.4% 4 Excellent 57.7% 15 Satisfactory 11.5% 3 Very Good 7.7% 2 Needs Improvement 7.7% 2 Satisfactory 11.5% 3 No Opinion 11.5% 3

Needs Improvement 7.7% 2 No Opinion 15.4% 4

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 50.0% 13 Very Good 11.5% 3 Satisfactory 11.5% 3 Needs Improvement 7.7% 2 No Opinion 19.2% 5

David Fraga 68 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 50.0% 34 Very Good 19.1% 13 Excellent 55.9% 38 Satisfactory 1.5% 1 Very Good 16.2% 11 Needs Improvement 4.4% 3 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 No Opinion 25.0% 17 Needs Improvement 5.9% 4 No Opinion 22.1% 15 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 51.5% 35 Very Good 17.6% 12 Excellent 57.4% 39 Satisfactory 2.9% 2 Very Good 14.7% 10 Needs Improvement 2.9% 2 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 No Opinion 25.0% 17 Needs Improvement 5.9% 4 No Opinion 22.1% 15 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 57.4% 39 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 19.1% 13 Excellent 55.9% 38 Satisfactory 2.9% 2 Very Good 14.7% 10 Needs Improvement 4.4% 3 Satisfactory 2.9% 2 No Opinion 16.2% 11

Needs Improvement 2.9% 2 No Opinion 23.5% 16

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 51.5% 35 Very Good 19.1% 13 Satisfactory 2.9% 2 Needs Improvement 4.4% 3 No Opinion 22.1% 15

Kimberly Gamble 16 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 18.8% 3 Very Good 12.5% 2 Excellent 18.8% 3 Satisfactory 18.8% 3 Very Good 12.5% 2 Needs Improvement 12.5% 2 Satisfactory 25.0% 4 No Opinion 37.5% 6 Needs Improvement 18.8% 3 No Opinion 25.0% 4 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 18.8% 3 Very Good 12.5% 2 Excellent 25.0% 4 Satisfactory 31.3% 5 Very Good 18.8% 3 Needs Improvement 12.5% 2 Satisfactory 18.8% 3 No Opinion 25.0% 4 Needs Improvement 12.5% 2 No Opinion 25.0% 4 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 18.8% 3 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 12.5% 2 Excellent 18.8% 3 Satisfactory 25.0% 4 Very Good 18.8% 3 Needs Improvement 18.8% 3 Satisfactory 12.5% 2 No Opinion 25.0% 4

Needs Improvement 25.0% 4 No Opinion 25.0% 4

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 25.0% 4 Very Good 12.5% 2 Satisfactory 12.5% 2 Needs Improvement 25.0% 4 No Opinion 25.0% 4

Kathy Han 12 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 33.3% 4 Very Good 16.7% 2 Excellent 33.3% 4 Satisfactory 33.3% 4 Very Good 16.7% 2 Needs Improvement 16.7% 2 Satisfactory 8.3% 1 Needs Improvement 41.7% 5 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 33.3% 4 Very Good 16.7% 2 Excellent 33.3% 4 Satisfactory 25.0% 3 Very Good 16.7% 2 Needs Improvement 25.0% 3 Satisfactory 25.0% 3 Needs Improvement 25.0% 3 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 33.3% 4 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 16.7% 2 Excellent 33.3% 4 Satisfactory 33.3% 4 Very Good 16.7% 2 Needs Improvement 16.7% 2

Satisfactory 33.3% 4 Needs Improvement 16.7% 2

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 33.3% 4 Very Good 8.3% 1 Satisfactory 25.0% 3 Needs Improvement 25.0% 3 No Opinion 8.3% 1

Margaret Muñoz Harkins 12 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 8.3% 1 Very Good 16.7% 2 Excellent 25.0% 3 Satisfactory 25.0% 3 Very Good 8.3% 1 Needs Improvement 25.0% 3 Satisfactory 25.0% 3 No Opinion 25.0% 3 Needs Improvement 16.7% 2 No Opinion 25.0% 3 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 8.3% 1 Very Good 16.7% 2 Excellent 25.0% 3 Satisfactory 25.0% 3 Very Good 8.3% 1 Needs Improvement 16.7% 2 Satisfactory 25.0% 3 No Opinion 33.3% 4 Needs Improvement 16.7% 2 No Opinion 25.0% 3 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 16.7% 2 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 16.7% 2 Excellent 16.7% 2 Satisfactory 25.0% 3 Very Good 16.7% 2 Needs Improvement 16.7% 2 Satisfactory 16.7% 2 No Opinion 25.0% 3

Needs Improvement 25.0% 3 No Opinion 25.0% 3

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 16.7% 2 Very Good 16.7% 2 Satisfactory 16.7% 2 Needs Improvement 25.0% 3 No Opinion 25.0% 3

Elaine Jefferson 22 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 27.3% 6 Very Good 22.7% 5 Excellent 31.8% 7 Satisfactory 18.2% 4 Very Good 18.2% 4 Needs Improvement 9.1% 2 Satisfactory 13.6% 3 No Opinion 22.7% 5 Needs Improvement 13.6% 3 No Opinion 22.7% 5 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 31.8% 7 Very Good 18.2% 4 Excellent 36.4% 8 Satisfactory 22.7% 5 Very Good 9.1% 2 Needs Improvement 9.1% 2 Satisfactory 27.3% 6 No Opinion 18.2% 4 Needs Improvement 9.1% 2 No Opinion 18.2% 4 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 31.8% 7 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 13.6% 3 Excellent 31.8% 7 Satisfactory 27.3% 6 Very Good 18.2% 4 Needs Improvement 9.1% 2 Satisfactory 18.2% 4 No Opinion 18.2% 4

Needs Improvement 13.6% 3 No Opinion 18.2% 4

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 31.8% 7 Very Good 13.6% 3 Satisfactory 18.2% 4 Needs Improvement 9.1% 2 No Opinion 27.3% 6

Cheryl Lee-Collins 10 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 30.0% 3 Very Good 30.0% 3 Excellent 30.0% 3 Satisfactory 10.0% 1 Very Good 30.0% 3 Needs Improvement 10.0% 1 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 No Opinion 20.0% 2 Needs Improvement 10.0% 1 No Opinion 30.0% 3 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 40.0% 4 Very Good 30.0% 3 Excellent 40.0% 4 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Very Good 30.0% 3 Needs Improvement 10.0% 1 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 No Opinion 20.0% 2 Needs Improvement 10.0% 1 No Opinion 20.0% 2 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 30.0% 3 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 40.0% 4 Excellent 30.0% 3 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Very Good 40.0% 4 Needs Improvement 10.0% 1 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 No Opinion 20.0% 2

Needs Improvement 10.0% 1 No Opinion 20.0% 2

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 30.0% 3 Very Good 30.0% 3 Satisfactory 10.0% 1 Needs Improvement 10.0% 1 No Opinion 20.0% 2

Megan McLellan 9 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 44.4% 4 Very Good 22.2% 2 Excellent 55.6% 5 Satisfactory 11.1% 1 Very Good 22.2% 2 Needs Improvement 11.1% 1 Satisfactory 11.1% 1 No Opinion 11.1% 1 Needs Improvement 11.1% 1 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 44.4% 4 Excellent 55.6% 5 Very Good 22.2% 2 Very Good 22.2% 2 Satisfactory 22.2% 2 Satisfactory 11.1% 1 Needs Improvement 11.1% 1 Needs Improvement 11.1% 1 Is courteous and attentive toward Overall rating attorneys and witnesses Excellent 44.4% 4 Excellent 44.4% 4 Very Good 33.3% 3 Very Good 22.2% 2 Satisfactory 11.1% 1 Satisfactory 11.1% 1 Needs Improvement 11.1% 1

Needs Improvement 11.1% 1 No Opinion 11.1% 1

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 44.4% 4 Very Good 33.3% 3 Satisfactory 11.1% 1 Needs Improvement 11.1% 1

Lawrence Rousseau 25 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 56.0% 14 Very Good 24.0% 6 Excellent 60.0% 15 Satisfactory 4.0% 1 Very Good 28.0% 7 Needs Improvement 4.0% 1 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 No Opinion 12.0% 3 Needs Improvement 4.0% 1 No Opinion 8.0% 2 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 56.0% 14 Very Good 28.0% 7 Excellent 64.0% 16 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Very Good 24.0% 6 Needs Improvement 4.0% 1 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 No Opinion 12.0% 3 Needs Improvement 4.0% 1 No Opinion 8.0% 2 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 60.0% 15 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 24.0% 6 Excellent 56.0% 14 Satisfactory 4.0% 1 Very Good 28.0% 7 Needs Improvement 4.0% 1 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 No Opinion 8.0% 2

Needs Improvement 4.0% 1 No Opinion 12.0% 3

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 56.0% 14 Very Good 24.0% 6 Satisfactory 4.0% 1 Needs Improvement 4.0% 1 No Opinion 12.0% 3

Leigh Saint-Germain 37 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 35.1% 13 Very Good 13.5% 5 Excellent 37.8% 14 Satisfactory 10.8% 4 Very Good 10.8% 4 Needs Improvement 16.2% 6 Satisfactory 10.8% 4 No Opinion 24.3% 9 Needs Improvement 16.2% 6 No Opinion 24.3% 9 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 40.5% 15 Very Good 8.1% 3 Excellent 40.5% 15 Satisfactory 8.1% 3 Very Good 10.8% 4 Needs Improvement 18.9% 7 Satisfactory 8.1% 3 No Opinion 24.3% 9 Needs Improvement 16.2% 6 No Opinion 24.3% 9 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 37.8% 14 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 10.8% 4 Excellent 43.2% 16 Satisfactory 8.1% 3 Very Good 0.0% 0 Needs Improvement 18.9% 7 Satisfactory 10.8% 4 No Opinion 24.3% 9

Needs Improvement 21.6% 8 No Opinion 24.3% 9

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 40.5% 15 Very Good 5.4% 2 Satisfactory 8.1% 3 Needs Improvement 21.6% 8 No Opinion 24.3% 9

Adam Silverman 19 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 47.4% 9 Very Good 15.8% 3 Excellent 47.4% 9 Satisfactory 5.3% 1 Very Good 26.3% 5 Needs Improvement 10.5% 2 Satisfactory 5.3% 1 No Opinion 21.1% 4 Needs Improvement 5.3% 1 No Opinion 15.8% 3 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 52.6% 10 Very Good 21.1% 4 Excellent 42.1% 8 Satisfactory 5.3% 1 Very Good 21.1% 4 Needs Improvement 5.3% 1 Satisfactory 10.5% 2 No Opinion 15.8% 3 Needs Improvement 10.5% 2 No Opinion 15.8% 3 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 47.4% 9 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 21.1% 4 Excellent 52.6% 10 Satisfactory 10.5% 2 Very Good 15.8% 3 Needs Improvement 5.3% 1 Satisfactory 10.5% 2 No Opinion 15.8% 3

Needs Improvement 5.3% 1 No Opinion 15.8% 3

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 52.6% 10 Very Good 21.1% 4 Satisfactory 5.3% 1 Needs Improvement 5.3% 1 No Opinion 15.8% 3

Francelia Totty 23 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 26.1% 6 Very Good 21.7% 5 Excellent 30.4% 7 Satisfactory 17.4% 4 Very Good 21.7% 5 Needs Improvement 8.7% 2 Satisfactory 21.7% 5 No Opinion 26.1% 6 Needs Improvement 8.7% 2 No Opinion 17.4% 4 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 26.1% 6 Very Good 21.7% 5 Excellent 26.1% 6 Satisfactory 17.4% 4 Very Good 26.1% 6 Needs Improvement 8.7% 2 Satisfactory 21.7% 5 No Opinion 26.1% 6 Needs Improvement 8.7% 2 No Opinion 17.4% 4 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 30.4% 7 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 21.7% 5 Excellent 30.4% 7 Satisfactory 21.7% 5 Very Good 21.7% 5 Needs Improvement 8.7% 2 Satisfactory 17.4% 4 No Opinion 17.4% 4

Needs Improvement 8.7% 2 No Opinion 21.7% 5

Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 26.1% 6 Very Good 30.4% 7 Satisfactory 13.0% 3 Needs Improvement 8.7% 2 No Opinion 21.7% 5

MiHoa Vo 13 votes Uses attorneys’ time efficiently Follows the law Excellent 30.8% 4 Very Good 15.4% 2 Excellent 53.8% 7 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Very Good 7.7% 1 Needs Improvement 7.7% 1 Satisfactory 7.7% 1 No Opinion 46.2% 6 Needs Improvement 7.7% 1 No Opinion 23.1% 3 Works hard and is prepared Rules decisively and timely Excellent 38.5% 5 Very Good 15.4% 2 Excellent 46.2% 6 Satisfactory 15.4% 2 Very Good 15.4% 2 Needs Improvement 7.7% 1 Satisfactory 7.7% 1 No Opinion 23.1% 3 Needs Improvement 7.7% 1 No Opinion 23.1% 3 Overall rating Is courteous and attentive toward Excellent 46.2% 6 attorneys and witnesses Very Good 15.4% 2 Excellent 38.5% 5 Satisfactory 7.7% 1 Very Good 23.1% 3 Needs Improvement 7.7% 1 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 No Opinion 23.1% 3

Needs Improvement 7.7% 1 No Opinion 30.8% 4 Demonstrates impartiality Excellent 46.2% 6 Very Good 23.1% 3 Satisfactory 0.0% 0 Needs Improvement 0.0% 0 No Opinion 30.8% 4