Environmental Assessment Supporting the Eagle Pass South Checkpoint Renovation and Expansion

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Assessment Supporting the Eagle Pass South Checkpoint Renovation and Expansion Draft Environmental Assessment Supporting the Eagle Pass South Checkpoint Renovation and Expansion Maverick County, Texas April 2016 Abbreviations and Acronyms µg/m3 micrograms per cubic meter ppm parts per million ACM asbestos-containing materials RCRA Resources Conservation and AST aboveground storage tank Recovery Act BMP best management practice SAL State Antiquities Landmark CBP Customs and Border Protection SO2 sulfur dioxide CEQ Council on Environmental Quality tpy tons per year CFR Code of Federal Regulations TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act CO carbon monoxide TXDOT Texas Department of CO2 carbon dioxide Transportation CWA Clean Water Act U.S.C. United States Code dBA A-weighted decibel(s) USBP U.S. Border Patrol DHS Department of Homeland Security USEPA U.S. Environmental Protection EA Environmental Assessment Agency EIS Environmental Impact Statement USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service EO Executive Order VOC volatile organic compounds ESA Endangered Species Act ESCP erosion-and-sediment control plan FONSI Finding of No Significant Impact FPPA Farmland Protection Policy Act FR Federal Register GHG greenhouse gas Hwy Highway LBP lead-based paint mg/m3 Milligrams per cubic meter NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NHPA National Historic Preservation Act NOx nitrogen oxide NO2 nitrogen dioxide NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NRHP National Register of Historic Places O3 ozone OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration P.L. Public Law Pb lead PCBs polychlorinated biphenyls PM2.5 Aerodynamic size less than or equal to 2.5 microns PM10 Aerodynamic size less than or equal to 10 microns PMO Program Management Office PPE personal protective equipment ppb parts per billion 1 Cover Sheet 2 Preliminary Draft Environmental Assessment 3 Supporting the Eagle Pass South Checkpoint Renovation and Expansion 4 Maverick County, Texas 5 Responsible Agencies: Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border 6 Protection. 7 Affected Location: Eagle Pass South Checkpoint, Maverick County, Texas. 8 Report Designation: Preliminary Draft Environmental Assessment (EA). 9 Abstract: The Department of Homeland Security and the Border Patrol Facilities & 10 Tactical Infrastructure Program Management Office within U.S. Customs and Border 11 Protection propose to renovate and expand the existing Eagle Pass South Checkpoint 12 located in Maverick County, Texas. Infrastructure improvements would include the 13 construction of one to three acceleration/deceleration lanes, new signage, booths, canopy, 14 lighting, and structure updates. The existing checkpoint and inspection station currently 15 occupy approximately 0.25 acre along U.S. Highway 57 in Texas, 10 miles northeast of 16 the city of Eagle Pass at the southern end of the U.S. Border Patrol Del Rio Sector. 17 Renovation and expansion of the checkpoint would include acquiring 5 acres of land 18 adjacent to the existing checkpoint to construct proper acceleration and deceleration 19 lanes. During construction and renovation, 2 additional acres of land would be 20 temporarily acquired to provide construction staging and access areas. 21 The EA analyzes and documents potential environmental consequences associated with 22 the Proposed Action. The analyses presented in the EA indicate that implementation of 23 the Proposed Action would not result in significant environmental impacts, and a Finding 24 of No Significant Impact is appropriate. 25 Status updates for the EA may be obtained via the CBP EA website at http://www. 26 cbp.gov/about/environmental-cultural-stewardship/cbp-environmental-documents or by 27 emailing [email protected]. Comments on the EA or information requests may 28 be submitted to Eagle Pass EA, c/o Mr. Joseph Zidron, U.S. Customs and Border 29 Protection, 24000 Avila Road Suite 5020, Laguna Niguel, CA 92677; or by email at 30 [email protected]. 31 Privacy Advisory 32 Your comments on this document are requested. Letters or other written comments 33 provided may be published in the EA. Comments will normally be addressed in the EA 34 and made available to the public. Any personal information provided will be used only to 35 identify your desire to make a statement during the public comment period or to fulfill 36 requests for copies of the EA or associated documents. Private addresses will be 37 compiled to develop a mailing list for those requesting copies of the EA. However, only 38 the names of the private citizens making comments and specific comments will be 39 disclosed; personal home addresses and telephone numbers will not be published in the 40 EA. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Preliminary Draft ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SUPPORTING THE EAGLE PASS SOUTH CHECKPOINT RENOVATION AND EXPANSION MAVERICK COUNTY, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION Border Patrol Facilities and Tactical Infrastructure 24000 Avila Road, Suite 5020 Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 APRIL 2016 i ii Eagle Pass South Checkpoint Renovation and Expansion Preliminary Draft EA TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................ Inside Front Cover 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION ......................................... 1-3 1.3 FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYSIS .............................................................................. 1-3 1.4 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ....................................................................................... 1-4 2. Proposed Action and Alternatives......................................................................... 2-1 2.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 ALTERNATIVE 1: PROPOSED ACTION .................................................................. 2-1 2.3 ALTERNATIVE 2: NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE ...................................................... 2-1 2.4 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED BUT ELIMINATED FROM FURTHER DETAILED ANALYSIS .......................................................................................................... 2-2 3. Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences ................................. 3-1 3.1 PRELIMINARY IMPACT SCOPING ......................................................................... 3-2 3.1.1 Aesthetics and Visual Resources ............................................................... 3-2 3.1.2 Land Use .................................................................................................... 3-2 3.1.3 Environmental Justice ................................................................................ 3-2 3.2 NOISE ................................................................................................................. 3-3 3.2.1 Definition of the Resource ......................................................................... 3-3 3.2.2 Affected Environment ................................................................................ 3-4 3.2.3 Environmental Consequences .................................................................... 3-5 3.3 AIR QUALITY ..................................................................................................... 3-6 3.3.1 Definition of the Resource ......................................................................... 3-6 3.3.2 Affected Environment ................................................................................ 3-7 3.3.3 Environmental Consequences .................................................................... 3-8 3.4 GEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ................................................................................ 3-10 3.4.1 Definition of the Resource ....................................................................... 3-10 3.4.2 Affected Environment .............................................................................. 3-10 3.4.3 Environmental Consequences .................................................................. 3-11 3.5 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ................................................................................. 3-12 3.5.1 Definition of the Resource ....................................................................... 3-12 3.5.2 Affected Environment .............................................................................. 3-12 3.5.3 Environmental Consequences .................................................................. 3-18 3.6 CULTURAL RESOURCES .................................................................................... 3-20 i Eagle Pass South Checkpoint Renovation and Expansion Preliminary Draft EA TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.6.1 Definition of the Resource ....................................................................... 3-20 3.6.2 Affected Environment .............................................................................. 3-20 3.6.3 Environmental Consequences .................................................................. 3-21 3.7 WATER RESOURCES ......................................................................................... 3-22 3.7.1 Definition of the Resource ....................................................................... 3-22 3.7.2 Affected Environment .............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Ii.2. Meridian Highway (Sh 2) – Us 81 – Ih 35/35W
    The Development of Highways in Texas: A Historic Context of the Bankhead Highway and Other Historic Named Highways II.2. MERIDIAN HIGHWAY (SH 2) – US 81 – IH 35/35W INTRODUCTION The Meridian Highway historically has been the major north–south named highway in Texas since the early 1910s. As originally conceived by the International Meridian Road Association in 1911, it stretched from Canada to Mexico, extending through the nation’s mid-section and the expansive Great Plains region. It initially was planned to enter Texas near Burkburnett and continued south through Wichita Falls, Bowie, Fort Worth, Cleburne, Waco, Austin, San Antonio and Laredo. A major lateral, called the Gulf Division, was planned to extend from Waco to Galveston, passing through Marlin, Bryan, Hempstead, and Houston. (See Figure 164.) With the creation of the Texas Highway Department in 1917, the Meridian Highway in Texas was designated as SH 2, signifying that the Texas Highway Commission deemed it to be the state’s second most important highway at the time, after the Bankhead Highway (SH 1). The adoption of the AASHO interstate highway numbering plan added another designation layer onto the Meridian Highway: US 81. That name, rather than SH 2, has endured over time. However, US 81 did not follow the route proposed by the Meridian Road Association precisely. The creation of US 81 in Texas excluded the Wichita Falls– Bowie leg, which was renamed as US 277 and, later, US 370. The Gulf Division also was excluded from the route of US 81; instead, it became SH 6 and, later, US 75.
    [Show full text]
  • Bee Creek Land & Cattle
    BEE CREEK LAND & CATTLE South Line of Old San Antonio Road, South of Wheelock Bryan, Texas WORKING CATTLE RANCH | FOR SALE BEE CREEK LAND & CATTLE South Line of Old San Antonio Road, South of Wheelock Bryan, Texas SUMMARY • PROPERTY DESCRIPTION • PROPERTY PHOTOS • DISCLAIMER OFFERING SUMMARY Sales Price $7,995,000 Granada Farms Bremond St Price/AC $8,883/AC Property Highlights • Beautiful +/- 900 AC Central Deep Well Rd Texas cattle ranch with frontage on Old San Antonio Road and Deep Well Road Subject • Working ranch with water piped to all pastures for rotational grazing • Improved coastal Bermuda pastures, over-seeded with perennial ball clover and gulf TX-OSR (Old San Antonio Rd) coast rye • Commercial set of working pens, capable of handling 600 head of Scasta Ln cattle • Fenced and cross fenced, with Wheelock Hall Rd 11 pastures and numerous 2-8 AC traps • 1,900 SF 3 bedroom 3 bath house, 9,822 SF barn with office & sale area Shadow Creek Subdivision • Investment potential for future development/homesites BEE CREEK LAND & CATTLE South Line of Old San Antonio Road, South of Wheelock Bryan, Texas SUMMARY • PROPERTY DESCRIPTION • PROPERTY PHOTOS • DISCLAIMER PROPERTY INFORMATION Size +/- 900 AC Exceptional, rare large acreage in Northeast Brazos County along Old San Antonio Road in Wheelock, Texas. 25 minutes northeast of Bryan/College Station and Texas Location A&M University. Easy access from Highway 6, I-45, and I-35. 75 miles from Waco, 104 miles from Austin, 116 miles from Houston, 160 miles from Dallas/Fort Worth, and 176 miles from San Antonio. Subject 1,900 SF ranch style home remodeled in 2001, two sets of pens including a large set of steel working cattle pens, shop, 9,822 SF sale barn with viewing pens & office, hay, equipment and livestock barns.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property
    NFS Form 10-900-b 0MB No. 1024-0018 (Jan. 1987} United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places u Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is for use in documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions'm ttMelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Type all entries. A. Name of Multiple Property Listing_________________________________________ Historic and Architectural Resources of Nacogdoches / Texas______________ B. Associated Historic Contexts Community Planning and Development in Nacogdoches: 1830-1940 C. Geographical Data 1990 city limits of Nacogdoches, Nacogdoches County, Texas I I See continuation sheet D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistgoLwith the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requii^n^ents set jprJJafTrT36 QFR Part 60 aijg^tJ^Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Planning and Evaluation. Tature of certifying offjpfal Date State Historic Preservation Officer, Texas Historical Commission State or Federal agency and bureau I, hereby, certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register. eeper of the National Register Date E. Statement of Historic Contexts Discuss each historic context listed in Section B.
    [Show full text]
  • Brazos County Natural History: Plants, Animals, Weather, Geology and Related Topics 1905-1909 Compiled by Bill Page 22 March 2010
    Brazos County Natural History: Plants, Animals, Weather, Geology and Related Topics 1905-1909 compiled by Bill Page 22 March 2010 The sunflower contest is becoming interesting indeed. On yesterday an Eagle reporter was called upon to witness the measurement of one growing in the yard of a gentleman living in front of the court house, and the plant was found to be 13 feet and nine inches high. There appears to be no limit to the altitude to which Brazos County soil can raise the flaming disc of the Helianthus annuus. Bryan Morning Eagle, 29 June 1905, p.5 The people of the Thompson Creek and Parker School House communities will hold a union revival meeting at Jones’ Spring, under a large brush arbor, beginning Wednesday, July 27. Dr. Geo. B. Butler and Rev. S.R. McClung will do the preaching. Bryan Morning Eagle, 29 June 1904 p.5, col.2. S.H. Allphin, J.W. Brogdon, Jeff Cole, L.B. Kern, Dave Kern and H.H. Brogdon left yesterday for a hunt on the Navasota River. Bryan Morning Eagle, 13 July 1904, p.3 W.H. McVey of Wellborn was in town yesterday trying to get a lot of his town friends to break their record and take a drink of pure water. He had a demijohn of the famous pure Minter Springs water. This place, Minter Springs, will yet be famous for its abundance of pure, cold spring water, and the surroundings of cool, shady groves. McVey had three fine Poland China pigs with him, of the famous Sims strain of prize winners.
    [Show full text]
  • Mexican American History Resources at the Briscoe Center for American History: a Bibliography
    Mexican American History Resources at the Briscoe Center for American History: A Bibliography The Briscoe Center for American History at the University of Texas at Austin offers a wide variety of material for the study of Mexican American life, history, and culture in Texas. As with all ethnic groups, the study of Mexican Americans in Texas can be approached from many perspectives through the use of books, photographs, music, dissertations and theses, newspapers, the personal papers of individuals, and business and governmental records. This bibliography will familiarize researchers with many of the resources relating to Mexican Americans in Texas available at the Center for American History. For complete coverage in this area, the researcher should also consult the holdings of the Benson Latin American Collection, adjacent to the Center for American History. Compiled by John Wheat, 2001 Updated: 2010 2 Contents: General Works: p. 3 Spanish and Mexican Eras: p. 11 Republic and State of Texas (19th century): p. 32 Texas since 1900: p. 38 Biography / Autobiography: p. 47 Community and Regional History: p. 56 The Border: p. 71 Education: p. 83 Business, Professions, and Labor: p. 91 Politics, Suffrage, and Civil Rights: p. 112 Race Relations and Cultural Identity: p. 124 Immigration and Illegal Aliens: p. 133 Women’s History: p. 138 Folklore and Religion: p. 148 Juvenile Literature: p. 160 Music, Art, and Literature: p. 162 Language: p. 176 Spanish-language Newspapers: p. 180 Archives and Manuscripts: p. 182 Music and Sound Archives: p. 188 Photographic Archives: p. 190 Prints and Photographs Collection (PPC): p. 190 Indexes: p.
    [Show full text]
  • Underground Railroad Route Along El Camino Real De Los Tejas
    Underground Railroad Route Along El Camino Real de las Tejas By Rolonda Teal July 2010 Challenge Cost Share Program National Trails Intermountain Region National Park Service Underground Railroad Route Along El Camino Real de la Tejas Project Background In eastern Texas and western Louisiana, El Camino Real de la Tejas was formed from a series of trails used by Caddo Indians for travel between villages. Spanish colonists took over parts of those existing trails for the transportation of animals, military, civilian and religious personnel as well as supplies. Camino Real translates simply as the “King’s Highway” and continued to be used in this way throughout Spanish dominion. French citizens from Louisiana also used the same paths for illegal and legal trade and as a means of travel to San Antonio to conduct business. After the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, portions of El Camino Real that were associated with the American period became known as the Old San Antonio Road. El Camino Real represents a series of paths that intercepted at various points along a main thoroughfare and not just a single road. In all, the King’s Highway as defined by the National Park Service extends from Monclova, Mexico to Natchitoches, Louisiana and covers approximately 2,400 miles in distance (NPS 1998:1). In 1911 the Texas chapter of the Daughters of the American Revolution adopted a resolution calling for formal identification and marking of the historic road. MajorV. N. Zively was hired to survey the route in an attempt to identify original portions of the road. A year later Zively reported that portions of the road could definitely be identified.
    [Show full text]
  • One Hundred Third Congress of the United States of America
    S. 983 One Hundred Third Congress of the United States of America AT THE FIRST SESSION Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three An Act To amend the National Trails System Act to direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the El Camino Real Para Los Texas for potential addition to the National Trails System, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``El Camino Real Para Los Texas Study Act of 1993''. SEC. 2. FINDINGS. The Congress findsÐ (1) El Camino Real Para Los Texas was the Spanish road established to connect a series of missions and posts extending from Monclova, Mexico to the mission and later Presidio Nuestra de Pilar de los Adaes which served as the Spanish capital of the province of Texas from 1722 to 1772; (2) El Camino Real, over time, comprised an approximately 1,000-mile corridor of changing routes from Saltillo through Monclova and Guerrero, Mexico; San Antonio and Nacogdoches, Texas and then easterly to the vicinity of Los Adaes in present day Louisiana; and constituted the only major overland route from the Rio Grande to the Red River Valley during the Spanish Colonial Period; (3) the seventeenth, eighteenth, and early nineteenth cen- tury rivalries among the European colonial powers of Spain, France, and England and after their independence, Mexico and the United States, for dominion over lands
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Spanish Royal Roads
    Spanish Royal Roads The Spanish empire in North America was linked with Spain via a series of Los Caminos Reales or royal roads. The three north-south roads west of Natchitoches continued to be used after Mexican independence in 1821 although no longer properly called royal roads. The name "El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro" (The Royal Road of the Interior Land) is most often applied to the trail that connected Mexico City with the missions, pueblos and presidios along the Rio Grande River extending north of Santa Fe, New Mexico. This trail followed the path taken by Juan de Oñate in 1598 to establish the province of New Spain. This Chihuahua Trail, connecting with the Santa Fe Trail was later used by traders as well as a the military in the Mexican War. In California the Royal Road, commonly called the "California Mission Trail" connected Mission San Francisco Solano in the north, via San Diego de Alcalá in San Diego, with Loreto in Baja California to the south. It also connected at San Diego with the road via Arispe to Mexico City. This road served primarily as a communication route between the California missions and the religious center of Mexico City. In 1776 Father Junípero Serra approved a monthly, courier mail system connecting the missions in California. The "El Camino Real de Los Tejas" (The Royal Road of the Texas) traversed Texas following the Sabine River and connected Mexico City with what is now Natchitoches, Louisiana. This road was used as a supply and military route during the War of Texas independence as well as the Mexican War.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric Life, Labor, and Residence in Southeast Central Texas: Results of Data Recovery at 41HY163, the Zapotec Site, San Marcos, Texas
    Volume 2011 Article 9 2011 Prehistoric Life, Labor, and Residence in Southeast Central Texas: Results of Data Recovery at 41HY163, the Zapotec Site, San Marcos, Texas Jon C. Lohse [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Lohse, Jon C. (2011) "Prehistoric Life, Labor, and Residence in Southeast Central Texas: Results of Data Recovery at 41HY163, the Zapotec Site, San Marcos, Texas," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 2011, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.21112/ita.2011.1.9 ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2011/iss1/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Prehistoric Life, Labor, and Residence in Southeast Central Texas: Results of Data Recovery at 41HY163, the Zapotec Site, San Marcos, Texas Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This article is available in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2011/iss1/9 PREHISTORIC LIFE, LABOR, AND RESIDENCE IN SOUTHEAST CENTRAL TEXAS Results of Data Recovery at 41HY163, the Zatopec Site, San Marcos, Texas Edited by Jon C.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Survey of Brazos County, Texas
    United States In cooperation with Department of Texas Agricultural Agriculture Experiment Station and Soil Survey of Texas State Soil and Water Natural Conservation Board Brazos County, Resources Conservation Service Texas 3 How To Use This Soil Survey General Soil Map The general soil map, which is a color map, shows the survey area divided into groups of associated soils called general soil map units. This map is useful in planning the use and management of large areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the map, identify the name of the map unit in the area on the color-coded map legend, then refer to the section General Soil Map Units for a general description of the soils in your area. Detailed Soil Maps The detailed soil maps can be useful in planning the use and management of small areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the Index to Map Sheets. Note the number of the map sheet and turn to that sheet. Locate your area of interest on the map sheet. Note the map unit symbols that are in that area. Turn to the Contents, which lists the map units by symbol and name and shows the page where each map unit is described. The Contents shows which table has data on a specific land use for each detailed soil map unit. Also see the Contents for sections of this publication that may address your specific needs. 4 This soil survey is a publication of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Testing at the Headwaters of the San Marcos River: Southwest Texas State University Raw Water Supply Project
    Volume 2000 Article 9 2000 Archaeological Testing at the Headwaters of the San Marcos River: Southwest Texas State University Raw Water Supply Project Anthony S. Lyle Center for Archaeological Research Christopher E. Horrell Center for Archaeological Research Steve A. Tomka Raba Kistner, [email protected] Diane A. Cargill Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Center for Archaeological Research Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Lyle, Anthony S.; Horrell, Christopher E.; Tomka, Steve A.; and Cargill, Diane A. (2000) "Archaeological Testing at the Headwaters of the San Marcos River: Southwest Texas State University Raw Water Supply Project," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 2000, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.21112/ita.2000.1.9 ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2000/iss1/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Archaeological Testing at the Headwaters of the San Marcos River: Southwest Texas State University Raw Water Supply Project Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License This article is available in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2000/iss1/9 Archaeological Testing at the Headwaters of the San Marcos River: Southwest Texas State University Raw Water Supply Project Anthony S.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Report
    - Scoping Report - El Camino Real de los Tejas National Historic Trail Comprehensive Management Plan/ Environmental Assessment June 2007 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service National Trails System, Santa Fe Preparers: Aaron Mahr John Conoboy Brooke Taralli Sharon A. Brown TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Acronyms and Abbreviations……………………………………………………..………iii Introduction and Background………………………………………………………………….….1 Planning Issues...……………………………………………………………………………….….9 Planning Criteria ........................................................................................................…..…….….10 Future Steps in the Planning Process…………………….…………………………….…...……12 MAP Map 1. Designated National Historic Trail….…………… ………………………….….……….3 TABLES Table 1. Public Scoping Meetings ………………………………………….…………………....5 Table 2. Meeting Attendee Representation………………………………….…………….……...7 APPENDICES Appendix 1. Representative Media Releases……………………………....……………….……13 Appendix 2. Written Comments…………………………………………….……………...…....16 Appendix 3. Verbal Comments Recorded During Public Meetings…………..………….……...23 ii LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS CMP/EA Comprehensive Management Plan/Environmental Assessment ELTE El Camino Real de los Tejas National Historic Trail GIS Geographic Information System NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NHT National Historic Trail NPS National Park Service iii INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND This report summarizes comments, feedback, and input received from the public in the spring of 2007 during scoping for a proposed Comprehensive
    [Show full text]