The Intersection of Learning Architecture and Instructional Design in E-Learning

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

e-Technologies in Engineering Education Learning Outcomes Providing Future Possibilities The Intersection of Learning Architecture and Instructional Design in e-Learning Diana L. Wilkinson, AT&T Business Learning Services Abstract Peers collaborate, learn from each other, learn to con- A sturdy Learning Architecture is necessary to lay the founda- tribute to the knowledge community as they learn to tion for effective learning in the age of the Internet. Comple- work towards common goals and shared vision mentary technologies must be integrated into what is poten- tially so pervasive that it could be said to be a Learning Eco- Mentors coach individuals and teams to remove barri- system. Not only is the technology of this infrastructure im- ers to understanding, provide guidance to aid in explo- pacted by the decision to knit disparate parts into an inte- ration of efficient approaches when students become grated whole, but Instructional Design methodology is impacted frustrated, curious, or anxious to validate their under- as well. A Learning Ecosystem capitalizes standing on reusability, on underlying shared logic and taxonomy, and on convergence of learn- Challenge is balanced with the needs ing and Knowledge Management to support and abilities of individual students a new model where learning and work are seamlessly and inextricably linked. Learning experience is perceived as fun. I. Introduction TEE 2002 The challenge of learning and applying that Optimal learning occurs in the simulation of learning is at the core of engineering real world, problem-based activities. This disciplines. The challenge of technology- happens in a safe environment where errors based business is to apply engineering are expected, and failure deepens learning A UNITED ENGINEERING solutions to customers’ needs. What experience. Optimal learning occurs in envi- FOUNDATION CONFERENCE differentiates both schools and businesses ronments where: Davos, Switzerland 11-16 August 2002 is how well and how efficiently we meet this http://www.coe.gatech.edu/eTEE challenge. Learners are scaffolded as they de- velop self-efficacy in enabling technologies II. Context Availability and delivery of instructional resources We have come to the fork in the road where we can choose to adapt to learner’s needs redefine how we learn, how we teach, how we apply, how we solve problems, how we differentiate ourselves and those we Feedback is continuous represent, and how we contribute to the greater good. Our com- puting technology and the Internet has evolved to the point Scoring is constantly visible to compare accomplish- that we can leverage and refine the infrastructure to enable au- ment to one’s own previous attempts, the best of one’s thentic learning. We can tap into our collective knowledge re- cohorts, and the total field that has ever been scored serves both to withdraw and contribute new knowledge, new applications, and new insights. We have begun to experiment Access to the underlying knowledge-base has been with ways to convert inaccessible tacit knowledge into acces- skillfully crafted and organized for learners sible explicit knowledge, and recognize the value of converging these information sources with e-learning. Knowledge manage- Cognitive loading is eased until foundation understand- ment and e-learning provide us with the tools and infrastructure ing is established, then cognitive dissonance and chal- to consciously and dramatically alter our approach. lenge increased until complexity mirrors the real world We learn best by doing. We get our instructional design model Pace of learning is controlled by learners backwards when we insist on deluging students with facts, prin- ciples, theorems, axioms of both pure and applied science, then Proceedings of the 2002 eTEE Conference 11-16 August 2002 Davos, Switzerland 213 e-Technologies in Engineering Education Learning Outcomes Providing Future Possibilities expect them to recall and apply this knowledge in practice. We students and providing them the support, knowledge and in- learn best by starting with a realistic problem that needs to be centive to join the learning community. solved and seeking the resources and knowledge relevant to help solve the problem posed. We learn best by making mis- B. Knowledge Base takes, having experts tutor and guide us as we improve our solutions until we arrive at optimal ones. We learn best when we Working backwards from the desired learning outcome, the learn- accept personal responsibility for our own learning. ing delivery system needs to provide access to all relevant re- sources. These resources can include: a knowledge base, a sci- We also learn from others through observation and then perfect ence, a particular body of knowledge, or a human resource such our newly acquired knowledge via mimicry. We are more effi- as a mentor, professor or subject matter expert. The instructional cient learners once we acquire social learning skills. We need to designer is challenged to create a realistic and engaging virtual become members of a larger learning community, a network of environment that allows learners to investigate, relate, and ap- birds-of-a-feather where we can posit our questions and our ply the knowledge base to resolve the litany of problems in- insights. volved in constructing desirable epiphanies of understanding. As students we must learn to manage all our resources. We C. Learning-How-To-Learn must know how to query for relevant knowledge and discrimi- nate what is valid. We must develop strategies for solving prob- The primary goals of education must be to help students learn lems. We must have a safe place, a laboratory, where we can how to learn, seek, test, and apply information. Students must experiment, test and make mistakes as we learn. We learn in learn to build upon what is already known to construct new order to solve problems. We solve problems to improve the knowledge, new applications and new solutions. How does e- human condition and because to do so is intrinsically and/or learning help us ensure more authentic learning is enabled and extrinsically rewarding. that we do not simply mirror traditional teaching models in an electronic delivery mode? We must recast our traditional in- A. Learning Infrastructure structional design into constructed new models. Our new mod- els must be performance-based, include problem-solving goals, The fork in the road – the enabling technology/the infrastruc- be contextually relevant and learner-centric. Our new model must ture – is coming together…but it is not fait accompli. One of the focus on developing competencies and critical thinking. Our architectural problems awaiting solution is the elegant integra- new models must be sensitive to individual needs and contexts, tion of and access to our collective knowledge base. We have to as well as the dynamics of groups learning as cohorts. We must work out the mechanisms of contribution, validation, organiza- engineer learning structures to optimize the learner’s opportu- tion, permission, rights, privileges and payment – but then some- nity to explore, discover and develop personal learning con- how connect all relevant bodies of knowledge and create sim- structs. plistic yet intelligent access. D. Problem-based Learning III. e-Learning Strategies Goal-oriented problems that are case-based lend themselves to One of Stephen Covey’s principles is to “begin with the end in narrative description and simulation. Multiple voices of experts mind.” This principle can be applied quite well to the instruc- can be evoked to tell relevant stories and direct students to tional design of e-learning. The premise for a course of learning investigate the foundation knowledge necessary to underpin should be driven by what the student will construct and, what reasonable solutions. The e-learning structure should allow stu- deliverable is to be created that will demonstrate that all requi- dents to peel away the layers of its onionskin as they pursue the site skills and knowledge have been mastered. This strategy construction of their own solutions. must be implemented in several areas. The brave, new world of e-learning will be predicated on our A. Motivation ability to build engaging, realistic scenarios that enable discov- ery learning. The best designs can be repeated by changing out The design of problem-based learning is not trivial. Problems the specific problem set and/or the resources required for solv- must be intriguing, relevant and sufficiently challenging to mo- ing the problem within a reusable framework. Fundamental re- tivate students to want to participate. Not all students will drink sources may be applicable in multiple contexts. Reusability is willingly from the well. Strategies must be employed to help key to efficient design, so we must look for opportunities to reluctant students overcome their objections and become ac- repurpose content, context, application, and format — the com- tive participants. Like shepherds online instructors, facilitators binations and permutations of which are nearly infinite, and not and mentors can expect to spend time locating straggling unduly limiting or stifling to creativity. Proceedings of the 2002 eTEE Conference 11-16 August 2002 Davos, Switzerland 214 e-Technologies in Engineering Education Learning Outcomes Providing Future Possibilities IV. Integration of Learning and Work B. Instructional Design of e-Learning In the brave new world, learning and work are simultaneous, Instructional Design methodologies
Recommended publications
  • Universal Instructional Design Implementation Guide Credits

    Universal Instructional Design Implementation Guide Credits

    The Universal Instructional Design Implementation Guide Credits Written by: Jaellayna Palmer Project Manager and Instructional Designer Universal Instructional Design Project Teaching Support Services University of Guelph Aldo Caputo Manager Learning Technology & Courseware innovation Teaching Support Services University of Guelph Designed by: Doug Schaefer Graphic Designer Teaching Support Services University of Guelph Funded by: The Learning Opportunities Task Force Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities, Government of Ontario 2002-03 Acknowledgements Teaching Support Services would like to acknowledge and offer thanks to the following contributors to this project: • The Learning Opportunities Task Force, Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities, Government of Ontario, which provided funding during 2002-03. • Linda Yuval, Research Assistant for the UID project, and her advisor, Professor Karen Korabik, Department of Psychology, University of Guelph. • Personnel within the Centre for Students with Disabilities, and the Learning Commons, University of Guelph. • Professors and TAs who participated in our course projects. • Students who volunteered to participate in the UID project and who provided their feedback. Universal Instructional Design Implementation Guide ii Table of Contents Universal Instructional Design ......................................................................................................................1 Universal Instructional Design Principles (Poster) ........................................................................................4
  • Designing for Online Interaction: Scaffolded and Collaborative Interventions in a Graduate-Level Blended Course

    Designing for Online Interaction: Scaffolded and Collaborative Interventions in a Graduate-Level Blended Course

    The Call Triangle: student, teacher and institution Designing for online interaction: Scaffolded and collaborative interventions in a graduate-level blended course Claudia Álvarez and Liliana Cuesta * Universidad de La Sabana,Campus Universitario Puente del Común,Chía,Colombia Abstract This article examines types of interaction from the perspective of intervening agents and interaction outcomes. We argue that the strategic combination of these types of interaction with certain core features (such as dosified input, attainable goal-setting, personalization and collaboration) contribute to creating a more effective relationship between instructional design, use and the interactional purposes of learning activities. The paper also offers instructors and course designers various considerations regarding the pedagogical nature of learning activities and the actions that both learners and instructors can carry out to optimize the online educational experience. Consideration for emergent trends in research on related areas are also presented. Keywords : online interaction; instructional design; course design; e-learning; scaffolding 1. Introduction In the context of online education, constructs such as instructional design, implementation of learning activities, scaffolding, assessment, resource selection and interaction among agents are seen as essential attributes of online courses and/or modules (Cuesta, 2010a). In educational scenarios, the interrelation of all these components has a direct impact on the learning performance of the students
  • Project Management in Instructional Design

    Project Management in Instructional Design

    PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN by Shamon A. Allen A dissertation presented to the faculty of The International Institute for Innovative Instruction In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES in Instructional Design Leadership FRANKLIN UNIVERSTIY Columbus, Ohio December 2020 Joel Gardner, Ph.D., Faculty Mentor and Chair Lewis Chongwony, Ph.D., Committee Member Niccole Hyatt, Ph.D., Committee Member Franklin University This is to certify that the dissertation prepared by Shamon Allen “Project Management in Instructional Design” Has been approved by his committee as satisfactory completion of the dissertation requirements for the degree of Doctor of Professional Studies in Instructional Design Leadership 12/16/2020 Joel Gardner, Ph.D., Committee Chair Niccole Hyatt Niccole Hyatt (Dec 16, 2020 08:25 EST) 12/16/2020 Niccole Hyatt, Ph.D., Committee Member 12/16/2020 Lewis Chongwony, Ph.D., Committee Member Yi Yang Yi Yang (Dec 16, 2020 21:36 EST) 12/16/2020 Yi Yang, Ph.D., Program Chair, DPS 12/17/2020 Wendell Seaborne, Ph.D., Dean, Doctoral Studies ii Copyright Shamon A. Allen 2020 iii ABSTRACT Project Management in Instructional Design by Shamon A. Allen, Doctor of Professional Studies Franklin University, 2020 Major Professor: Dr. Joel L. Gardner Department: International Institute for Innovative Instruction This study surveyed 86 instructional design professionals based on a two-part approach to identify and validate the most critical instructional design project management competencies. First, a systematic review of instructional design project management literature was conducted to identify key project management competencies. Next, a survey instrument was created based on common themes identified during the systematic analysis of qualitative study results on instructional design project management competencies.
  • WHAT IS LEARNING EXPERIENCE DESIGN? & Why It Matters PRESENTERS

    WHAT IS LEARNING EXPERIENCE DESIGN? & Why It Matters PRESENTERS

    WHAT IS LEARNING EXPERIENCE DESIGN? & why it matters PRESENTERS Kristen Hernandez Lydia Treadwell Learning Experience Designer Learning Experience Designer LSU Digital & Continuing Education LSU Digital & Continuing Education [email protected] [email protected] OVERVIEW • What is Learning Experience Design (LXD)? • LXD Development Tools • Empathy mapping • “Pillars” of LXD • LXD Matrix • Application activity LXD=ID+UX Learning Experience Design (LXD) is interdisciplinary approach to developing well-designed learning environments that employ both sound Instructional Design (ID) and User Experience Design (UXD) techniques. LXD=ID+UX1 learning theories alignment maps design models storyboards instructional analysis item analysis Instructional Design LXD=ID+UX2 empathy-mapping prototyping personas iterative design scenarios user testing Learner-Centered Design Empathy map The Four Pillars of Learning Experience INSTRUCTION • approach to the method of instruction, tailored for the context, content, and learner. • creating a meaningful learning experience • address the gaps that exist between the learner and the desired outcome • practice and apply new skills in real-world or authentic contexts CONTENT • appropriate selection of content that supports acquisition of outcomes • outline the necessary knowledge, skills, and resources needed for learners to fulfill those outcomes. • effective arrangement of instructional material including the content flow, chunking, and organization • content structured in a way that makes the most logical and relevant
  • Teaching Sustainable Design Using BIM and Project-Based Energy Simulations

    Teaching Sustainable Design Using BIM and Project-Based Energy Simulations

    Educ. Sci. 2012, 2, 136-149; doi:10.3390/educsci2030136 OPEN ACCESS education sciences ISSN 2227-7102 www.mdpi.com/journal/education Case Report Teaching Sustainable Design Using BIM and Project-Based Energy Simulations Zhigang Shen *, Wayne Jensen, Timothy Wentz and Bruce Fischer The Durham School of Architectural Engineering and Construction, The University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 113 NH, Lincoln, NE 68588-0500, USA; E-Mails: [email protected] (W.J.) ; [email protected] (T.W.) ; [email protected] (B.F.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-402-472-9470; Fax: +1-402-472-4087. Received: 11 July 2012; in revised form: 4 August 2012/ Accepted: 20 August 2012/ Published: 27 August 2012 Abstract: The cross-disciplinary nature of energy-efficient building design has created many challenges for architecture, engineering and construction instructors. One of the technical challenges in teaching sustainable building design is enabling students to quantitatively understand how different building designs affect a building’s energy performance. Concept based instructional methods fall short in evaluating the impact of different design choices on a buildings’ energy consumption. Building Information Modeling (BIM) with energy performance software provides a feasible tool to evaluate building design parameters. One notable advantage of this tool is its ability to couple 3D visualization of the structure with energy performance analysis without requiring detailed mathematical and thermodynamic calculations. Project-based Learning (PBL) utilizing BIM tools coupled with energy analysis software was incorporated into a senior level undergraduate class. Student perceptions and feedback were analyzed to gauge the effectiveness of these techniques as instructional tools.
  • An Object-Oriented Approach

    An Object-Oriented Approach

    INSTRUCTIONAL WEB SITES DESIGN: AN OBJECT-ORIENTED APPROACH. A Dissertation Presented by THOMAS ZSCHOCKE Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION May 2002 Center for International Education Department of Educational Policy, Research and Administration School of Education © Copyright by Thomas Zschocke 2002 All Rights Reserved INSTRUCTIONAL WEB SITES DESIGN: AN OBJECT-ORIENTED APPROACH. A Dissertation Presented by THOMAS ZSCHOCKE Approved as to style and content by: Robert J. Miltz, Chair George E. Forman, Member Miguel Romero, Member D. Nico Spinelli, Member Bailey W. Jackson, Dean School of Education ABSTRACT INSTRUCTIONAL WEB SITES DESIGN: AN OBJECT-ORIENTED APPROACH. MAY 2002 THOMAS ZSCHOCKE, DIPLOM-SOZIALPÄDAGOGE, UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES COLOGNE, GERMANY M.A., UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE, GERMANY Ed.D. UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Directed by: Professor Robert F. Miltz The great variety of authoring activities involved in the development of Web- based learning environments requires a more comprehensive integration of principles and strategies not only from instructional design, but also from other disciplines such as human-computer interaction and software engineering. The present dissertation addresses this issue by proposing an object-oriented instructional design (OOID) model based on Tennyson's fourth generation instructional systems development (ISD4) model. It incorporates object-oriented analysis and design methods from human-computer interaction (HCI) and software engineering into a single framework for Internet use in education. Introducing object orientation into the instructional design of distributed hypermedia learning environments allows for an enhanced utilization of so-called learning objects that can be used, re-used or referenced during technology-mediated instruction.
  • Instructional Design

    Instructional Design

    Careers in Instructional Design TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview 1 Common Job Duties 2 Common Required Skills 2 How Graduate Skills Translate 2 Possible Job Titles 3 Steps You Can Take to Prepare 3 Finding Job Postings 4 Applying for Positions 4 Interviewing for Positions 4 Resources for Further Study 5 OVERVIEW Instructional designers specialize in educational curriculum design and Projected Percent Growth in implementation. They are pedagogical Employment, 2016-2026 specialists informed by theories of learning, teaching, and assessment who Instructional 11% work in a variety of academic, nonprofit, Coordinators and commercial settings. They might work with faculty members to create Other Education, online versions of college courses, or they Training, and Library 9% Occupations may consult with leading companies to develop employee training materials. Many of the best instructional designers Total, All Occupations 7% started their careers as teachers, so if you enjoy teaching and curriculum design, 0% 5% 10% 15% this may be a career for you. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the employment outlook for instructional designers in strong, with an 11 percent increase in positions expected between 2016 and 2026. The median annual wage was $63,750 in 2017. UChicago graduate students and postdocs will also be glad to know that many hiring managers prefer instructional designers with graduate degrees. grad.uchicago.edu 2 COMMON JOB DUTIES COMMON REQUIRED SKILLS . Develop and coordinate the . Teaching skills, especially the ability to implementation of curricula design and execute curricula . Assess student needs and discuss the . Strong curiosity and an ability to quickly implementation of appropriate learn new things pedagogical strategies with teachers .
  • Using Instructional Interactivity to Improve E-Learning Design

    Using Instructional Interactivity to Improve E-Learning Design

    Using Instructional Interactivity to Improve e-Learning Design by Ethan Edwards, Chief Instructional Strategist “The interactivity we design for e-learning must require the learner to do something that is cognitively demanding and that leads to improved performance.” Ethan Edwards chief instructional strategist Intro The real benefit of e-learning is being able to create a design need to be intellectually engaged for learning to happen. that improves learners’ skills and behavior while simultaneously Lasting change requires meaningful and compelling mental achieving the operational advantages that e-learning offers engagement and interaction. organizations. Yet much e-learning is composed of largely wasted opportunities for useful interactivity. The real challenge as designers of e-learning is not so much how to best convey information (that part is relatively easy), What most people fail to understand about e-learning is that the but rather, it is to design experiences that engage learners in mere presence of technology in a learning environment does not meaningful activities—activities in which the otherwise trivial change the essential aspects of how people learn. Learning does actions of pointing mouse cursors and pressing keys take on not occur passively. In live teaching, lecture formats with minimal a significance that represents consequential thinking. Read activity on the part of the learner do not work very well. Yet some on to learn how Allen Interactions’ Context, Challenge, Activity e-learning designers tend to create e-learning lessons that and Feedback (CCAF) Design Model achieves true instructional are little more than exercises in listening or reading. Learners interactivity and leads to actual performance change.
  • Oral Communication Assignment Charrette

    Oral Communication Assignment Charrette

    ACSC Crawford Hall 230 & 231 2550 Campus Rd, Honolulu, HI 96822 manoa.hawaii.edu/assessment Assessment and Learning Resource Repository Oral Communication Assignment Charrette Hill, Y. Z. (2020, Sept 9). Oral Communication Assignment Charrette [Online workshop]. Assessment and Curriculum Support Center and Center for Teaching Excellence, University of Hawaiʻi at1 Mānoa, Honolulu, HI, United States Oral Communication Assignment Charrette Yao Z. Hill, Ph.D. Assessment and Curriculum Support Center University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Slide 1 DATE: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 TIME: 2:00pm - 3:30pm LOCATION: Online Event ORAL COMMUNICATION ASSIGNMENT CHARRETTE Do you want to improve the design of your oral communication assignment to maximize student learning in this new virtual environment? Come to this highly interactive workshop to learn oral communication assignment design principles and strategies. Receive constructive feedback from your peers and experts in oral communication instruction and research. Walk away from the workshop with concrete plans to enhance your assignments that lead to deep learning and development in students. After a brief introduction of the assessment principles and tools, participants will join small group breakout rooms to share and receive peer feedback through a structured discussion, facilitated by experienced oral communication instructors and experts. Our expert team includes Drs. Amy Hubbard, Soo Shin, Jaymian Urashima from Communicology Department, Jenifer Winter from Communication Department, Dr. Laura Armer, Director of College of Social Sciences Online Programs, and Cari Ryan from the General Education Office. Participants will also have an opportunity to share their insights as a group at the end of the workshop. Workshop registrants are asked to: •Respond to a short survey before the workshop for the facilitators to arrange breakout rooms.
  • Instructional Design Document Examples

    Instructional Design Document Examples

    Instructional Design Document Examples Odie outwells unrepentingly? Unwifely and boyish Sigfrid syncretized her cardinal-bishop forests or curse thinkingly. Redundant and rubberised Gershom never Jacobinised his warring! Beginning during the online instruction educational problems are instructional design, we designed to learn and revisit their own time you already have a learning spaces between theory Include a few pages of your storyboard, or even a link to the full storyboard file. Use proper shading of boxes and text so that text is legible and easily read. Types of learning activities can range from audio, video, animation, gamification, and simulation, to more traditional activities such as reading and lecturing. When sharing your experience as an Instructional Designer, focus on the practical value of your activities, as well as your capabilities for problem solving and executing complex projects from scratch. Do quality assurance testing as you go, and look at your project as if you were a client trying to catch every possible issue. She is efficient, a strong writer, and an excellent communicator. As the project proceeds, do you see that IDs are able to grasp the topic immediately or do they need help? How do I print the instructions listed on the screen? Once the learning objective are set, the Learning Design Tool transfers them into a course outline and provides prompts for additional relevant information. Microlearning and gamification are widely adopted to deliver learning in the flow of work. Although this document follow apa style and instructional design document examples of mobile consumer application of the addie model is your paper airplanes in the two types.
  • Design and Evaluation of the User Interface of Foreign Language Multimedia Software: a Cognitive Approach

    Design and Evaluation of the User Interface of Foreign Language Multimedia Software: a Cognitive Approach

    Language Learning & Technology July 1998, Volume 2, Number 1 http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num1/article2/ pp. 40-53 (page numbers in PDF differ and should not be used for reference) DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF THE USER INTERFACE OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE MULTIMEDIA SOFTWARE: A COGNITIVE APPROACH Jan L. Plass University of New Mexico ABSTRACT This paper is concerned with criteria for the design and evaluation of the user interface of foreign language multimedia software. A hybrid model is proposed that combines a cognitive and software engineering approaches. Based on this proposed contextualized model of interface design, domain- specific evaluation criteria are developed to describe how well the user interface is able to support the cognitive processes involved in the development of linguistic and pragmatic skills and competencies in SLA. The application of these criteria is demonstrated using the multimedia software CyberBuch/Ciberteca. INTRODUCTION The growing number of instructional multimedia software applications for SLA and the large variety of features and components of these programs generate a need for methods to evaluate systematically these materials. This paper is concerned with the design and evaluation of one of the most prominent components of a software product-- the user interface. Defined in very general terms as the part of an application in charge of communication with the learner, the user interface conveys the functionality of a computer application to the user, and translates the user's input into a machine-specific format (see Figure 1). Despite this key function of facilitating human-computer interaction, issues in the design of the user interface are often neglected in the development of instructional software.
  • The Competencies and Goals of Instructional Designers: a Survey Study

    The Competencies and Goals of Instructional Designers: a Survey Study

    The Competencies and Goals of Instructional Designers: A Survey Study Dan Arnold, Oakland University Mel Edwards, Purdue University Olysha Magruder, Johns Hopkins University Shaun Moore, Oakland University STUDY OBJECTIVES The UPCEA eDesign Collaborative Research Team wished to explore the discrepancies that exist between commonly identified competencies and those deemed necessary by instructional designers (IDs) actively working in postsecondary education. This study identifies: • Competencies required of IDs • Actual work performed by IDs • Work IDs would prefer to be doing • Career plans and goals of IDs • ID access to professional development. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Instructional designers defined their role and work in ten categories or competencies, in order of highest to lowest responses: 1. Collaborating 6. Designing 2. Content creating 7. Training 3. Consulting 8. Project management 4. Support 9. Reviewing 5. Theory 10. Policy In terms of collaboration, content creation, and consulting, IDs indicated their role was largely one of collaboration, with 57 participants describing ways they collaborate with faculty or subject-matter experts (SMEs). Thirty-one IDs described their role as one of content creators, creating content for courses. When not creating, 29 IDs detailed their roles as consultants, coaching faculty on best practices to use in their courses. 1 Instructional designers gave examples of the support they provide users, such as assisting faculty with their technology usage. Part of this support was helping to understand not only how to use the technology, but also applying best practices and teaching theory, as evidenced by the 26 participants that mentioned using the ADDIE model, backward design, pedagogy, andragogy, learning theory, universal design for learning (UDL) and scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL).