Growth and Population Parameters of the Spade Nose Shark, Scoliodon Laticaudus from Calicut Coast P
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Field Guide to Requiem Sharks (Elasmobranchiomorphi: Carcharhinidae) of the Western North Atlantic
Field guide to requiem sharks (Elasmobranchiomorphi: Carcharhinidae) of the Western North Atlantic Item Type monograph Authors Grace, Mark Publisher NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service Download date 24/09/2021 04:22:14 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/20307 NOAA Technical Report NMFS 153 U.S. Department A Scientific Paper of the FISHERY BULLETIN of Commerce August 2001 (revised November 2001) Field Guide to Requiem Sharks (Elasmobranchiomorphi: Carcharhinidae) of the Western North Atlantic Mark Grace NOAA Technical Report NMFS 153 A Scientific Paper of the Fishery Bulletin Field Guide to Requiem Sharks (Elasmobranchiomorphi: Carcharhinidae) of the Western North Atlantic Mark Grace August 2001 (revised November 2001) U.S. Department of Commerce Seattle, Washington Suggested reference Grace, Mark A. 2001. Field guide to requiem sharks (Elasmobranchiomorphi: Carcharhinidae) of the Western North Atlantic. U.S. Dep. Commer., NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS 153, 32 p. Online dissemination This report is posted online in PDF format at http://spo.nwr.noaa.gov (click on Technical Reports link). Note on revision This report was revised and reprinted in November 2001 to correct several errors. Previous copies of the report, dated August 2001, should be destroyed as this revision replaces the earlier version. Purchasing additional copies Additional copies of this report are available for purchase in paper copy or microfiche from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161; 1-800-553-NTIS; http://www.ntis.gov. Copyright law Although the contents of the Technical Reports have not been copyrighted and may be reprinted entirely, reference to source is appreciated. -
1 Decline in CPUE of Oceanic Sharks In
IOTC-2009-WPEB-17 IOTC Working Party on Ecosystems and Bycatch; 12-14 October 2009; Mombasa, Kenya. Decline in CPUE of Oceanic Sharks in the Indian EEZ : Urgent Need for Precautionary Approach M.E. John1 and B.C. Varghese2 1 Fishery Survey of India, Mormugao Zonal Base, Goa - 403 803, India 2 Fishery Survey of India, Cochin Zonal Base, Cochin - 682 005, India Abstract The Catch Per Unit Effort (CPUE) and its variability observed in resources surveys reflect on the standing stock of the resource and the changes in the stock density. Data on the CPUE of sharks obtained in tuna longline survey in the Indian EEZ by Govt. of India survey vessels during 1984 – 2006 were considered in this study. A total effort of 3.092 million hooks yielded 20,884 sharks. 23 species belonging to five families were recorded. Average hooking rate was 0.68 percent which showed high degree of spatio-temporal variability. Sharp decline was observed in the hooking rate from the different regions. The trend in the CPUE is a clear indication of the decline in the abundance of sharks in the different regions of the EEZ, the most alarming scenario being on the west coast as well as the east coast, where the average hooking rate recorded during the last five years was less than 0.1 percent. It is evident from the results of the survey that the standing stock of several species of sharks in the Indian seas has declined to such levels that the sustainability of the resource is under severe stress requiring urgent conservation and management measures. -
Species Composition of the Largest Shark Fin Retail-Market in Mainland
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Species composition of the largest shark fn retail‑market in mainland China Diego Cardeñosa1,2*, Andrew T. Fields1, Elizabeth A. Babcock3, Stanley K. H. Shea4, Kevin A. Feldheim5 & Demian D. Chapman6 Species‑specifc monitoring through large shark fn market surveys has been a valuable data source to estimate global catches and international shark fn trade dynamics. Hong Kong and Guangzhou, mainland China, are the largest shark fn markets and consumption centers in the world. We used molecular identifcation protocols on randomly collected processed fn trimmings (n = 2000) and non‑ parametric species estimators to investigate the species composition of the Guangzhou retail market and compare the species diversity between the Guangzhou and Hong Kong shark fn retail markets. Species diversity was similar between both trade hubs with a small subset of species dominating the composition. The blue shark (Prionace glauca) was the most common species overall followed by the CITES‑listed silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis), scalloped hammerhead shark (Sphyrna lewini), smooth hammerhead shark (S. zygaena) and shortfn mako shark (Isurus oxyrinchus). Our results support previous indications of high connectivity between the shark fn markets of Hong Kong and mainland China and suggest that systematic studies of other fn trade hubs within Mainland China and stronger law‑enforcement protocols and capacity building are needed. Many shark populations have declined in the last four decades, mainly due to overexploitation to supply the demand for their fns in Asia and meat in many other countries 1–4. Mainland China was historically the world’s second largest importer of shark fns and foremost consumer of shark fn soup, yet very little is known about the species composition of shark fns in this trade hub2. -
And Their Functional, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications
DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Science and Health Theses and Dissertations College of Science and Health Spring 6-14-2019 Body Forms in Sharks (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii), and Their Functional, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications Phillip C. Sternes DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/csh_etd Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Sternes, Phillip C., "Body Forms in Sharks (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii), and Their Functional, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications" (2019). College of Science and Health Theses and Dissertations. 327. https://via.library.depaul.edu/csh_etd/327 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Science and Health at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Science and Health Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Body Forms in Sharks (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii), and Their Functional, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science June 2019 By Phillip C. Sternes Department of Biological Sciences College of Science and Health DePaul University Chicago, Illinois Table of Contents Table of Contents.............................................................................................................................ii List of Tables..................................................................................................................................iv -
The Future of Sharks: a Review of Action and Inaction
The Future of Sharks: A Review of Action and Inaction January 2011 By Mary Lack and Glenn Sant JIM ABERNETHY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: on the part of TRAFFIC or its supporting organizations The authors wish to acknowledge the input provided or The Pew Charitable Trusts concerning the legal by a number of TRAFFIC network regional staff and status of any country, territory or area, or of its to thank staff from the Pew Environment Group and authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its TRAFFIC for helpful comments on the draft report. frontiers or boundaries. Published by TRAFFIC International (Cambridge, U.K.) The TRAFFIC symbol copyright and registered and the Pew Environment Group (Washington, D.C.). trademark ownership is held by WWF. TRAFFIC is a joint program of WWF and IUCN. © 2011 TRAFFIC International and the Pew Environment Group. CITATION: M. Lack and Sant G. (2011). The Future of Sharks: A All rights reserved. Review of Action and Inaction. TRAFFIC International and the Pew Environment Group. All material appearing in this publication is copyrighted and may be reproduced with permission. TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade monitoring network, works Any reproduction in full or in part of this publication to ensure that trade in wild plants and animals is not a must credit TRAFFIC International and the Pew threat to the conservation of nature. Environment Group as the copyright owner. The Pew Environment Group is the conservation arm The views of the authors expressed in this publication of The Pew Charitable Trusts, a nongovernmental do not necessarily reflect those of the TRAFFIC organization that applies a rigorous, analytical network, WWF and the Pew Environment Group. -
Species Carcharhinus Brachyurus (Günther, 1870
FAMILY Carcharhinidae Jordan & Evermann, 1896 - requiem sharks [=Triaenodontini, Prionidae, Cynocephali, Galeocerdini, Carcharhininae, Eulamiidae, Loxodontinae, Scoliodontinae, Galeolamnidae, Rhizoprionodontini, Isogomphodontini] GENUS Carcharhinus Blainville, 1816 - requiem sharks [=Aprion, Aprionodon, Bogimba, Carcharias, Eulamia, Galeolamna, Galeolamnoides, Gillisqualus, Gymnorhinus, Hypoprion, Hypoprionodon, Isoplagiodon, Lamnarius, Longmania, Mapolamia, Ogilamia, Platypodon, Pterolamia, Pterolamiops, Uranga, Uranganops] Species Carcharhinus acarenatus Moreno & Hoyos, 1983 - Moroccan shark Species Carcharhinus acronotus (Poey, 1860) - blacknose shark [=remotus] Species Carcharhinus albimarginatus (Rüppell, 1837) silvertip shark [=platyrhynchus] Species Carcharhinus altimus (Springer, 1950) - bignose shark [=radamae] Species Carcharhinus amblyrhynchoides (Whitley, 1934) - graceful shark Species Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos (Bleeker, 1856) - grey reef shark [=coongoola, fowleri, nesiotes, tufiensis] Species Carcharhinus amboinensis (Müller & Henle, 1839) - Java shark [=brachyrhynchos, henlei, obtusus] Species Carcharhinus borneensis (Bleeker, 1858) - Borneo shark Species Carcharhinus brachyurus (Günther, 1870) - copper shark, bronze whaler, narrowtooth shark [=ahenea, improvisus, lamiella, remotoides, rochensis] Species Carcharhinus brevipinna (Müller & Henle, 1839) - great blacktip shark [=brevipinna B, calamaria, caparti, johnsoni, maculipinnis, nasuta] Species Carcharhinus cautus (Whitley, 1945) - nervous shark Species Carcharhinus -
Carcharhinidae Fishing Area 51 (W
click for previous page CARCH Lamio 1 1983 FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION SHEETS FAMILY: CARCHARHINIDAE FISHING AREA 51 (W. Indian Ocean) Lamiopsis temmincki (Müller & Henle, 1839) OTHER SCIENTIFIC NAMES STILL IN USE : Carcharhinus or Eulamia temmincki (Müller & Henle, 1839) VERNACULAR NAMES: FAO : En - Broadfin shark Fr -Requin grandes ailes Sp - Tiburón aletón NATIONAL: underside of head DISTINCTIVE CHARACTERS: A small to medium-sized shark. Body moderately stout. Snout moderately long, parabolic in shape, its length about equal to mouth width and greater than distance between nostrils; labial furrows short; anterior nasal flaps with a short, broad lobe; spiracles absent; teeth in upper jaw with high, broadly triangular, erect to semioblique, serrated cusps and no cusplets; teeth in lower jaw with erect, high, hooked, smooth-edged narrow cusps and no cusplets. First dorsal fin moderately large, with a narrowly rounded apex, its origin over inner margins of pectoral fins, its free rear tip moderately long; second dorsal fin very large, nearly or quite as large as first dorsal, its inner margin shorter than fin height, its origin anterior to anal fin origin; pectoral fins moderately long, basally very broad and not falcate, with narrowly rounded tips; anal fin with posterior margin slightly concave; upper precaudal pit a shallow longitudinal depression, not transverse and crescentic, No dermal ridge between dorsal fins, and no keels on caudal peduncle. Colour: grey or yellow-grey above, lighter below; no conspi- upper tooth and lower tooth cuous markings. near centre DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERS OF SIMILAR SPECIES OCCURRING IN THE AREA: Negaprion acutidens: snout shorter, its length less than mouth width, and broadly rounded or obtusely wedge- shaped; upper and lower teeth with narrow, smooth- edged, high, erect or semioblique cusps, bases of upper teeth weakly serrated or smooth; dorsal and pelvic fins falcate (not falcate in Lamiopsis temmincki); pectoral fins narrower and more falcate, and anal fin with a deeply notched posterior margin. -
Requiem Sharks (Also, Ground Sharks, Blue Sharks, Sharpnose Sharks) Small to Large Sharks
click for previous page CARCH 1983 FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION SHEETS FISHING AREA 51 (W. Indian Ocean) CARCHARHINIDAE* Requiem sharks (also, ground sharks, blue sharks, sharpnose sharks) Small to large sharks. Trunk and precaudal tail cylindrical, not depressed and without lateral ridges; precaudal tail much shorter than trunk. Head not expanded laterally, conical to moderately depressed; 5 small- to medium-sized gill slits present, the last 1 to 3 over or behind pectoral fin origins, their upper ends not expanded onto dorsal surface of head; no gill sieves and usually no gillrakers on internal gill slits (short dermal gillrakers present in Prionace); spiracles usually absent (but always present in Galeocerdo); nostrils well-separated from mouth, without barbels, nasoral grooves, or circumnarial grooves; eyes on sides of head, with a well-developed nictitating lower eyelid; snout short to moderately long, conical and slightly pointed to depressed and broadly rounded, never greatly flattened and bladelike and without lateral teeth and barbels; mouth usually large, arched and elongated, and extending well behind eyes; labial furrows usually present on both jaws but generally greatly reduced, confined to mouth corners, and barely visible when mouth is closed (but Galeocerdo and some Rhizoprionodon species have well-developed labial furrows); upper labial furrows usually not reaching front of mouth (except in Galeocerdo); teeth small to large, blade-like, with a single cusp and cusplets variably developed; anterior teeth in upper jaw smaller -
Field Guide for the Identification of Major Demersal Fishes of India
Field Guide for the identification of major demersal fishes of India Rekha J. Nair and P.U Zacharia Demersal Fisheries Division, CMFRI, Kochi -682018 [email protected] Capture fisheries and aquaculture supplied the world with 142 million tonnes of fish in 2008 (SOFIA, 2010) of which 79.9 mt was contributed by marine capture fisheries. In India, demersal fishery resources contributed to about 28 % of the total estimated landings of 3.16 million tonnes. The major demersal fish resources of the country are elasmobranchs, perches, croakers, catfishes, lizard fishes, silverbellies and flatfishes. Elasmobranchs: Fishery is constituted by sharks, rays and skates. They belong to Class Chondrichthys. ) 51 families, 178 genera, 937 species of extant elasmobranchs (ie around 403 sps of sharks & 534 sps of skates and rays) ) 28 species of sharks and rays are known from freshwater. ) In India - ) 110 species of elasmobranchs - 66 species of sharks, 4 saw fishes, 8 guitar fishes and 32 rays ) 34 species are commercially important. 1 Phylum: Chordata Class Elasmobranchii Order Carcharhiniformes 9 Family Carcharhinidae - (Requiem sharks) ) one of the largest and most important families of sharks ) eyes circular ) nictitating eyelids internal; spiracles usually absent. ∗ Genus : Carcharhinus Small to large sharks with round eyes, internal nictitating eyelids, usually no spiracles. Teeth usually blade like with one cusp. Development usually viviparous with young born fully developed. Includes several dangerous species. Carcharhinus brevipinna – Spinner shark Conspicuous white band on sides. Second dorsal, anal, undersides of pectorals and lower caudal fin lobe black or dark grey-tipped; dorsal origin behind pectoral fin Carcharhinus limbatus – Black tip shark Black tip persistent on pelvic; dorsal origin at posterior end of pectoral. -
Sharks of Hong Kong
FACTSHEET WWF-HONG KONG • JULY 2020 © Andy Cornish / WWF-Hong Kong SHARKS OF HONG KONG Sharks were common year-round in Hong Kong in the 1940s, but have been decimated by decades of intensive fishing. There was a targeted fishery for sharks that involved up to 50 boats which started in the 1950s, peaked in the late 1960s with around 2,400 tonnes caught annually, and had largely collapsed by the 1980s. Catches by indiscriminate fishing gear such as bottom trawls and gill nets continued, and by the early 2000s catches of sharks had declined to negligible amounts, with most species now locally extinct. No sharks are protected in Hong Kong, nor are there any limits on their catches. 17 sharks have been recorded in the published literature and from verified observations from Hong Kong with reasonable certainty since 1846. Many of these have become very rare in recent decades, and so little is known about them locally. The South China Sea contains at least 109 species, some of which probably also inhabited Hong Kong. However, distinguishing these with certainty is difficult. FACTSHEET WWF-HONG KONG • JULY 2020 © Andy Cornish / WWF-Hong Kong Sharks Known from Hong Kong Waters Family / species Max. Implicated in IUCN Notes Length global shark conservation (cm) attacks * status ** Hemiscylliidae (Bamboo sharks) Slender bambooshark 65 Harmless, no Near threatened No confirmed records in recent decades, apparently (Chiloscyllium cases locally extinct indicum) Whitespotted 95 Harmless, no Near threatened One of only two shark species that is still bambooshark cases reasonably abundant in Hong Kong. Bottom (Chiloscyllium dwelling, feeds on small worms, invertebrates and plagiosum) fishes. -
The Biology and Population Dynamics of the Spadenose Shark Scoliodon Laticaudus in the Coastal Waters of Maharashtra State, India
Indian J. Fish., 44(1) : 11-27, Jan.-Mar., 1997 The biology and population dynamics of the spadenose shark Scoliodon laticaudus in the coastal waters of Maharashtra State, India MATHEW, C. JOSEPH' AND M. DEVAEAJ^ Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Versova, Mumbai - 400 061, India ABSTRACT The study of the biology and dynamics of Scoliodon laticaudus indicates a fast growth of 21.8 cm, 54.5 cm and 65.5 cm, in the first, second, and third year respectively. The von Bertalanffy growth equation was fitted to the above values for which the parameters calculated (on an annual basis) were : K = 0.6812, L^ = 74.023 cm, T_ = 12 years and t„= -0.01 year. The maximum length of this shark in the Mumbai waters is about 66 cm (3.1 years). The weight growth parameters (on an annual basis) for sexes combined by the VBGF are K = 0.5823, W_ = 1756.93 g, t^ = 0.0032 year. The length at birth is 14 cm with a gestation period of 4 months. The ovarian and uterine cycles operate concurrently with broods being released once a month. The average fecundity was 11 embryos per female. The LJL^ was estimated to be 0.47 - 0.54. Scolio don laticaudus is an active carnivore with a mixed diet composing of small sized teleosts, prawns, squilla and molluscs. There is no evidence of cannibalism. The study of the dynamics of Scoliodon laticaudus indicates that the stock is exploited at its optimum level. Therefore any increase in effort from the present level may not increase the yield and it is advisable to sustain the effort at the present level. -
US04CZOO21 UNIT: 1, TYPE: SCOLIODON Introductoion
US04CZOO21 UNIT: 1, TYPE: SCOLIODON Introductoion • The genus Scoliodon is distinguished from other dogfishes by having an elongated snout, depressed head and a compressed body. • The teeth are similar in both the jaws. • The caudal pit and the sub-caudal lobe are prominent and distinct. • The four Indian species of Scoliodon are: Scoliodon sorrakowah, S. dumerilii, S. palasorrah and S. walbeehmi. Systematic Position: Phylum Chordara • Subphylum Vertebrata(= Craniata) • Series – Pisces • Class – Elasmobranchii • Subclass – Selachii • Superorder – Selachoidei (= Pleurotremata) • Order – Lamniformes • Family – Carcharhiniidae • Scientific Name (Scoliodon sorrakowah) • Scoliodon sorrokowah is often spelled S. sorrakowa, It is wiled ‘milk shark’ because its flesh is used to promote lactation in women in India. Habit and Habitat of Scoliodon: • The shark is a marine, carnivorous and predaceous animal. • It eats small pelagic schooling and bottom living bony fishes, including anchovies, codlet, burrowing gobies and Bombay ducks as well as shrimps and cuttle fish. • Both sexes mature between 1-2 years old and the males reach largest size at the age of about 5 years and females reach largest size at the age of 6 years. • A common tropical shark of continental and frequently in rocky areas. • The species is abundant in Indian and Pakistani waters. Geographical Distribution of Scoliodon: • Scoliodon has a wide geographical distribution ranging from Zanzibar to Ceylon (Sri Lanka), Ceylon to the Malay Archipelago of the Indian Ocean, Bay of Bengal, Eastern Pacific (from Mexico to Panama), West Indies and eas•tern coasts of South America. • Fossils of Scoliodon have been discovered in the geological strata from the lower Eocene to later periods.