DOCSLIB.ORG

Thursday, September 24 General Session Estimated Run Time for This Program Is 3 Hours and 30 Min

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Thursday, September 24 General Session Estimated Run Time for This Program Is 3 Hours and 30 Min Thursday, September 24 General Session Estimated run time for this program is 3 hours and 30 min. Start Time 1:00 p.m. EDT 11:00 a.m. MDT 12:00 noon CDT 10:00 a.m. PDT Presiding Douglas R. Young, President American College of Trial Lawyers Farella Braun + Martel LLP San Francisco, California ------------------------------------------------------------ Welcome Remarks Hon. John G. Roberts, Jr. Chief Justice of the United States Washington, D.C. ------------------------------------------------------------ Introduction and Moderator of Panel Joe R. Caldwell, Jr., Regent American College of Trial Lawyers Steptoe & Johnson LLP Washington, D.C. Judicial Panel Discussion The Rt. Hon. Lady Arden Justice of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom London, England Justice Stephen G. Breyer Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States Washington, D.C. The Rt. Hon. Richard Wagner, P.C. Chief Justice of Canada Ottawa, Ontario ------------------------------------------------------------ Presentation of the Emil Gumpert Award to Tulane Law School Women’s Prison Project Introduction and Presentation Mark C. Surprenant, Emil Gumpert Award Committee Chair American College of Trial Lawyers Adams and Reese LLP New Orleans, Louisiana Remarks Becki T. Kondkar Senior Professor of the Practice Tulane Law School Domestic Violence Clinic New Orleans, Louisiana ------------------------------------------------------------ Introduction of Speaker William J. Murphy, Secretary Designate American College of Trial Lawyers Zuckerman Spaeder LLP Baltimore, Maryland Observations on the COVID Pandemic - Where Things Stand Today and Outlook for the Future Dr. Robert C. Gallo Co-founder & Director, Institute of Human Virology at University of Maryland School of Medicine The Homer & Martha Gudelsky Distinguished Professor in Medicine Co-founder & International Scientific Advisor, Global Virus Network ------------------------------------------------------------ Introduction of Speaker Susan S. Brewer, Regent American College of Trial Lawyers Steptoe & Johnson, PLLC Morgantown, West Virginia A Conversation with Dr. Robert J. Brown Dr. Robert J. (Bob) Brown CEO & Founder of B&C International Highpoint, North Carolina ------------------------------------------------------------ Presentation of Honorary Fellowship Presenter The Hon. Madam Justice Suzanne Cote Supreme Court of Canada Ottawa, Ontario Remarks from Honorary Fellow The Hon. Mr. Justice Nicholas Kasirer Supreme Court of Canada Ottawa, Ontario ------------------------------------------------------------ Introduction of the Lewis F. Powell, Jr. Lecture Robert B. Fiske, Jr., Past President American College of Trial Lawyers Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP New York, New York Remarks Former U.S. Secretary of Defense William Cohen Chairman and CEO of The Cohen Group The Cohen Group Washington, D.C. ------------------------------------------------------------ Announcements and Adjournment for the day Friday, September 25 General Session and Induction Ceremony Program is estimated to run 3 hours 10 min with Induction Ceremony beginning at 4:30 p.m. EDT Start Time 1:00 p.m. EDT 11:00 a.m. MDT 12:00 noon CDT 10:00 a.m. PDT Presiding Douglas R. Young, President American College of Trial Lawyers Farella Braun + Martel LLP San Francisco, California ------------------------------------------------------------ Introduction of Panel Moderator Jason Reid Senior NFL Writer, The Undefeated The impact of COVID-19 on Sports and Challenges Surrounding Return to Work Participants Tony Clark Executive Director Major League Baseball Players, Inc. Don Fehr Executive Director National Hockey League Players Association Michele Roberts, FACTL Executive Director National Basketball Players Association DeMaurice F. Smith, FACTL Executive Director National Football League Players Association ------------------------------------------------------------ Introduction of Speaker Daniel E. Reidy, Regent American College of Trial Lawyers Jones Day Chicago, Illinois A Conversation with Scott Turow Scott Turow Bestselling Author Evanston, Illinois ------------------------------------------------------------ Introduction of Panel Moderator and Panelist Charles L. “Chip” Babcock, FACTL American College of Trial Lawyers Jackson Walker LLP Dallas, Texas Comedy in the Age of COVID, Politics and Correctness Participants Adam Sztykiel Screenwriter/Producer Hollywood, California Wallace B. Jefferson, Former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas Partner, Alexander Dubose & Jefferson LLP Austin, Texas Ron White Stand-up Comedian, actor and author Los Angeles, California ------------------------------------------------------------ Introduction of Speaker Michael L. O’Donnell, Treasurer American College of Trial Lawyers Wheeler Trigg O’Donnell Denver, Colorado Remarks G. Marcus Cole Joseph A. Matson Dean and Professor of Law University of Notre Dame, Law School Notre Dame, Indiana ------------------------------------------------------------ Recognition of Retiring Regents PAUL J. HICKEY Hickey & Evans Cheyenne, Wyoming Regent for Region 4 - Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah, Wyoming DANIEL E. REIDY Jones Day Chicago, Illinois Regent for Region 8 - Illinois, Indiana, Wisconsin ROBERT E. WELSH, JR. Welsh & Recker, P.C. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Regent for for Region 13 - Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania ------------------------------------------------------------ Transition of College Officers Annual Meeting and Reorganization of the Board of Regents of the American College of Trial Lawyers Induction Ceremony will begin promptly at 4:30 p.m. EDT Induction Ceremony .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: a 10-Year Democratic Audit 2014 Canliidocs 33319 Adam M
    The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference Volume 67 (2014) Article 4 Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit 2014 CanLIIDocs 33319 Adam M. Dodek Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/sclr This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Citation Information Dodek, Adam M.. "Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit." The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference 67. (2014). http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/sclr/vol67/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The uS preme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit* Adam M. Dodek** 2014 CanLIIDocs 33319 The way in which Justice Rothstein was appointed marks an historic change in how we appoint judges in this country. It brought unprecedented openness and accountability to the process. The hearings allowed Canadians to get to know Justice Rothstein through their members of Parliament in a way that was not previously possible.1 — The Rt. Hon. Stephen Harper, PC [J]udicial appointments … [are] a critical part of the administration of justice in Canada … This is a legacy issue, and it will live on long after those who have the temporary stewardship of this position are no longer there.
    [Show full text]
  • Year in Review
    2 0 Year in Review 1Supreme 9 Court of Canada Cour suprême du Canada Find the Visit our Like us on Follow us on Supreme website at Facebook at Twitter at scc-csc.ca facebook.com/ twitter.com/SCC_eng Court of Supreme Canada CourtofCanada online! This was the very first photo ever taken of the current judges together. It was taken in the library of the Winnipeg Law Courts on September 23, 2019. © Supreme Court of Canada (2020) Front cover: Grand Hall, Supreme Court of Canada All photos (except pages 8-9, bottom photo on page 16, left-hand photos on page 17, and page 18): Supreme Court of Canada Collection Photo credits: Pages 4-5: Justices Abella and Côté – Philippe Landreville, photographer | Justice Karakatsanis – Jessica Deeks Photography | Justices Gascon, Brown, and Rowe – Andrew Balfour Photography Page 7: Cochrane Photography Page 8-9: True North Sports + Entertainment The Supreme Court of Canada emblem is a symbol of the Court as the highest judicial Page 16: Senate of Canada institution in Canada. It was designed nearly a century ago by the Page 17 - left side, top: Supreme Court of the United Kingdom distinguished Montreal architect Ernest Cormier, and can be found emblazoned Page 17 - left side, bottom: Embassy of Canada to Japan in the marble floor of the Court’s Grand Hall leading to the Main Courtroom. Page 18: Shannon VanRaes/Winnipeg Free Press As its emblem, it represents the Court’s key values of justice, independence, integrity, ISSN 2562-4776 (Online) transparency, and bilingualism. A Message from the Chief Justice When I became Chief Justice just over two years ago, I committed to making the Court more open and understandable, and to enhancing access to justice for everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • Year in Review Supreme Court of Canada Cour Suprême Du Canada Find the Supreme Court of Canada Online
    2020Year in Review Supreme Court of Canada Cour suprême du Canada Find the Supreme Court of Canada online Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Visit our website at SupremeCourtofCanada @SCC_eng www.scc-csc.ca Current bench of the Supreme Court of Canada Photo credits: All photos (except photo on page 9): Supreme Court of Canada Collection Page 3: Cochrane Photography Page 9: Speech from the Throne – PMO-CPM Pages 10 and 11: Justices Abella and Côté – Philippe Landreville, photographer | Justice Karakatsanis – Jessica Deeks Photography | Justices Brown and Rowe – Andrew Balfour Photography The Supreme Court of Canada emblem is a symbol of the Court as Page 28: Justices Brown, Abella et Kasirer – the highest judicial institution in Canada. It was designed nearly Justice Andromache Karakatsanis a century ago by the distinguished Montreal architect Ernest Supreme CourtSupreme Canada of Cormier, and can be found emblazoned in the marble floor of the Court’s Grand Hall leading to the Main Courtroom. © Supreme Court of Canada (2021) The emblem represents the Court’s key values of justice, ISSN 2562-4776 (Print) independence, integrity, transparency and bilingualism. Message from the Chief Justice Along with millions of Canadians in 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada found innovative ways to pivot, adapt and persevere through a global pandemic. Our dedicated employees introduced new technologies, streamlined processes and implemented protocols in collaboration with public health authorities to ensure everyone’s safety and health while serving Canadians. I am proud of the Court’s agility and commitment to maintain access to justice throughout a devastating public health crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Amity Visit to Canada 2019 Ju
    Programme Overview Wednesday 18 September 2019 (Ottawa) 17:00 - Treasurer’s Lecture by The Hon Justice Rosalie Silberman Abella, Supreme Court of Canada at the National Arts Centre, followed by a reception and dinner CDN$195per ticket Friday 20 September 2019 (Toronto) 14:00 - Appellate Advocacy Discussion and Moot at the Rosalie Silberman Abella Moot Courtroom, University of Toronto Free to attend 19:00 - Bench Call (Chief Justice of Canada and Sheila Block) and dinner at Osgoode Hall CDN$225 per ticket Saturday 21 September 2019 (Toronto) 09:30 - Seminars at Osgoode Hall Free to attend 17:30 - Farewell reception at the CN Tower Free to attend For booking and payment information please click here For more information please contact the Inn’s Membership Manager, Oliver Muncey, at [email protected] 2 Wednesday 18 September 2019 (Ottawa) Treasurer’s Lecture The Hon Justice Rosalie Silberman Abella, Supreme Court of Canada A Generation of Justice’s Journey: Now what? Venue - National Arts Centre 17:00 - Lecture 18:00 - Reception 19:00 - Dinner 21:30 - Carriages Dress code – Lounge suite/business attire Guests welcome CDN$195per ticket For booking and payment information please click here 3 Friday 20 September 2019 (Toronto) Moot and Appellate Advocacy Discussion Venue - Rosalie Silberman Abella Moot Courtroom, University of Toronto 14:00 - Introduction and Appellate Advocacy Discussion Chair: Andrew Hochhauser QC, Essex Court Chambers Speakers: The Rt Hon The Lord Judge, former Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales The Hon Justice Graeme Mew, Superior Court of Justice 14:30 - Moot before the Supreme Court Judges: The Rt Hon Sir Stanley Burnton, One Essex Court and former Lord Justice of Appeal The Hon Justice Kathryn N.
    [Show full text]
  • September 14, 2020 Hon. David Lametti, PC, MP Minister of Justice
    September 14, 2020 Hon. David Lametti, PC, MP Minister of Justice and Attorney-General of Canada House of Commons Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6 Dear Minister Lametti, Re: Appointment of BIPOC judges to Canada’s federal courts We are members of the legal community that represent and/or support clients in Canada’s federal courts. We are writing to urge you to take immediate action by appointing Black, Indigenous and People of Colour (BIPOC) judges to the federal courts and amending the criteria for their appointment to ensure the experiences of BIPOC applicants are valued. It is undeniable that the current racial composition of our federal courts does not reflect the diversity of Canada. Just last month, Supreme Court Chief Justice Richard Wagner highlighted the importance of racial representation on the bench in stating, “All Canadians should be able to see themselves reflected in their justice system. Justice should not make a person feel like an outsider or an ‘other’ when they confront it.”1 The legacy of centuries of institutional racism has led to a dominantly white federal bench making decisions governing the actions and behaviors of BIPOC communities, without ever having experienced the prejudices and racial biases faced by these communities. In the Federal Court’s current roster of 35 judges and 9 supernumeraries, there are only two BIPOC judges. This is especially troubling given that 63% of the Federal Court’s docket deals with immigration, refugee and Indigenous cases, areas in which almost all applicants are BIPOC.2 The Federal Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada, despite commitments to racial inclusion, continue to be all white benches.
    [Show full text]
  • Industry Update on Electricity, Natural Gas and Telecommunications
    Industry Update on Electricity, Natural Gas, and Telecommunications GPT2021-0562 ATTACHMENT 1 ENERGY PRICES AND MARKETS Natural Gas The 2021 March gas cost flow-through rate was $4.10 per gigajoule. Prices are forecast to remain relatively flat through 2021. Electricity The ENMAX regulated rate option price for 2021 March was 7.34 cents per kilowatt-hour. The month to date all-hours average power pool price for 2021 April 5 was 6.22 cents per kilowatt-hour. For reference, the all-hours average price for 2020 April was 2.89 cents per Page 1 of 4 ISC: Unrestricted Industry Update on Electricity, Natural Gas, and Telecommunications GPT2021-0562 ATTACHMENT 1 kilowatt-hour. Power pool prices are forecast to stay between 6 and 7 cents per kilowatt-hour for the remainder of 2021. UTILITIES AND INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENTS Supreme Court rules Canadian Carbon Tax is constitutional On 2021 March 25 in a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the Federal Government’s national carbon tax is entirely constitutional, putting an end to the two-year legal proceeding with conservative premiers over the policy. In the 405-page decision, Chief Justice Richard Wagner, speaking on behalf of the majority, found the Federal Government’s 2018 Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act — which requires provinces to meet minimum national standards to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by applying a price on the use of fossil fuels by large industries or consumers fueling their cars — “is critical to our response to an existential threat to human life in Canada and around the world.” Justice Malcolm Rowe and Justice Russell Brown wrote lengthy dissents, arguing the majority decision would give Ottawa precedent to set minimum national standards in other areas of provincial jurisdiction, “including intra-provincial trade and commerce, health, and the management of natural resources.” “This is a model of federalism that rejects our Constitution and rewrites the rules of Confederation,” Brown wrote.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Judicial Nomination Processes and the Press: ‘Interesting, in a Sleepy Sort of Way’
    Oñati Socio-legal Series, v. 4, n. 4 (2014) – Law in the Age of Media Logic ISSN: 2079-5971 Canadian Judicial Nomination Processes and the Press: ‘Interesting, in a Sleepy Sort of Way’ ∗ DAVID SCHNEIDERMAN Schneiderman, D., 2014. Canadian Judicial Nomination Processes and the Press: ‘Interesting, in a Sleepy Sort of Way’. Oñati Socio-legal Series [online], 4 (4), 685-708. Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2511239 Abstract Most of the recent appointees to the Supreme Court of Canada have participated in a new Canadian judicial nomination process initiated by the current Conservative government. As originally formulated in early policy platforms, the process was intended to mimic features of US Senate judicial confirmation hearings and so would highlight the distinction (popular in US political discourse) between ‘applying’ and ‘making’ law. This led to widespread fears that any new public process would politicize judicial appointments and functions at the Supreme Court. The process turned out to be much more tepid than anticipated and so raises questions about what Canadians may have learned as a consequence of this new nomination process. This paper undertakes a qualitative analysis of reporting of four nomination processes from a select number of Canadian newspapers. The main object is to determine the degree to which readers might have been alerted to the distinction between law and politics or, put another way, between judicial activism and restraint. It turns out that this framing was not dominant in the coverage and that, instead, distinctive Canadian political preoccupations, like language politics, got channeled through this new political opportunity structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Cases 2017: an Overview Lorne Sossin 2019 Canliidocs 4052 Osgoode Hall Law School of York University, [email protected]
    The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference Volume 88 (2019) Article 1 Constitutional Cases 2017: An Overview Lorne Sossin 2019 CanLIIDocs 4052 Osgoode Hall Law School of York University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/sclr Part of the Law Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Citation Information Sossin, Lorne. "Constitutional Cases 2017: An Overview." The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference 88. (2019). https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/sclr/vol88/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The uS preme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. 2019 CanLIIDocs 4052 Part I Introduction 1 2019 CanLIIDocs 4052 Constitutional Cases 2017: An Overview Lorne Sossin* 2019 CanLIIDocs 4052 This contribution reviews the Constitutional Cases issued by the Supreme Court in 2017. The analysis is divided into two parts. In the first part, I analyze the year as a whole, identifying noteworthy trends. In the second part, I explore some specific constitutional decisions of the Court — especially those concerning issues which in my view have important implications for the future of the Court and its constitutional jurisprudence. I. 2017: A YEAR IN REVIEW 2017 might best be described as a year in transition for the Supreme Court of Canada. This year represented Chief Justice McLachlin’s last on the Court (though cases on which she participated continued to be released through June 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • The Tenth Justice
    THE TENTH JUSTICE Judicial Appointments, Marc Nadon, and the Supreme Court Act Reference Carissima Mathen and Michael Plaxton Landmark Cases in Canadian Law Since Confederation, Canada’s highest court – first the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in England and then the Supreme Court of Canada – has issued a series of often contentious decisions that have fundamentally shaped the nation. Both cheered and jeered, these judgments have impacted every aspect of Canadian society, setting legal precedents and provoking social change. The issues in the judgments range from Aboriginal title, gender equality, and freedom of expression to Quebec secession and intellectual property. This series offers com- prehensive, book-length examinations of high court cases that have had a major impact on Canadian law, politics, and society. Other books in the series are: Flawed Precedent: TheSt. Catherine’s Case and Aboriginal Title by Kent McNeil Privacy in Peril: Hunter v Southam and the Drift from Reasonable Search Protections by Richard Jochelson and David Ireland From Wardship to Rights: TheGuerin Case and Aboriginal Law by Jim Reynolds For a list of other titles, see www.ubcpress.ca/landmark-cases-in-canadian-law. LANDMARK CASES IN CANADIAN LAW Contents Acknowledgments vii Introduction 3 1 What’s So Bad about Marc Nadon? 9 2 The Prime Minister’s Prerogative 22 3 Memos 38 4 Asking and Telling 69 5 The Legal Showdown 84 6 The Opinion and Its Critics 106 7 The Aftermath 124 8 Judicial Appointments Law 140 9 A Court Frozen in Amber 156 Conclusion 179
    [Show full text]
  • Keys Fine Art Auctioneers Palmers Lane Aylsham Two Day Books & Ephemera Sale Norwich NR11 6JA United Kingdom Started Aug 25, 2016 10:30Am BST
    Keys Fine Art Auctioneers Palmers Lane Aylsham Two Day Books & Ephemera Sale Norwich NR11 6JA United Kingdom Started Aug 25, 2016 10:30am BST Lot Description J R R TOLKIEN: THE HOBBIT OR THERE AND BACK AGAIN, illustrated David Wenzel, Forestville, Eclipse Books, 1990, limited 1 edition de-luxe (600), signed by the illustrator and numbered, original pictorial cloth gilt, dust wrapper, original silk lined solander box gilt J R R TOLKIEN AND DONALD SWANN: THE ROAD GOES EVER ON - A SONG CYCLE, London 1968, 1st edition, original paper 2 covered boards, dust wrapper J R R TOLKIEN: THE ADVENTURES OF TOM BOMBADIL, illustrated Pauline Baynes, London, 1962, 1st edition, original pictorial 3 paper-covered boards, dust wrapper J R R TOLKIEN: THE LORD OF THE RINGS, illustrated Alan Lee, North Ryde, Harpercollins, Australia, 1991, centenary limited edition 4 (200) numbered and signed by the illustrator, 50 coloured plates plus seven maps (of which one double page) as called for, original quarter blue morocco silvered, all edg ...[more] J R R TOLKIEN, 3 titles: THE LORD OF THE RINGS, London 1969, 1st India paper de-luxe edition, 1st impression, 3 maps (of which 2 5 folding) as called for, original decorative black cloth gilt and silvered (lacks slip case); THE HOBBIT OR THERE AND BACK AGAIN, 1986 de-luxe edition, 4th impression, orig ...[more] J R R TOLKIEN: THE HOBBIT OR THERE AND BACK AGAIN, 1976, 1st de-luxe edition, coloured frontis plus 12 coloured plates plus 6 two double page maps as called for, original decorative black cloth gilt and silvered,
    [Show full text]
  • Case in Brief: Ewert V. Canada (Correctional Service) 2018 SCC 30 | Judgment of June 13, 2018 | on Appeal from the Federal Court of Appeal
    SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Case in Brief: Ewert v. Canada (Correctional Service) 2018 SCC 30 | Judgment of June 13, 2018 | On appeal from the Federal Court of Appeal Prison authorities must show that psychological and statistical tools used to make decisions about Indigenous inmates are effective for them, the Supreme Court has said. Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) runs federal prisons. Its goal is to help rehabilitate inmates, while protecting other inmates, staff, and society as a whole. To do this, it uses certain psychological and statistical tools to make decisions about inmates, like whether s/he is likely to reoffend or what kind of supports s/he should get. Under the Corrections and Conditional Release Act, CSC has to “take all reasonable steps to ensure that any information about an offender that it uses is as accurate, up to date and complete as possible.” The Act also says CSC must make sure that its policies and programs are suitable for Indigenous offenders and take their specific needs and circumstances into account. Mr. Ewert is a federal inmate and identifies as Métis. He was serving two simultaneous life sentences for murder and attempted murder. Because certain tools used to make decisions about him were created based mostly on non-Indigenous people, Mr. Ewert argued they were less accurate for Indigenous persons like himself. He said that CSC was not following the law by using these tools on Indigenous offenders without proof that they worked. The Federal Court agreed with Mr. Ewert, but this was overturned by the Federal Court of Appeal.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court Hearings Outside Ottawa
    Office of the President Cabinet du président February 4, 2019 Via email: [email protected] The Right Honourable Richard Wagner, P.C. Chief Justice of Canada Supreme Court of Canada 301 Wellington Street Ottawa, ON K1A 0J1 Dear Chief Justice Wagner: The Canadian Bar Association has long been a proponent of innovation that enhances access to justice. I was recently reminded of the first occasion in which counsel presented applications for leave to appeal via satellite from a Vancouver courtroom to the Supreme Court of Canada in Ottawa. That was a 1983 joint experiment of the CBA and SCC, with the hope that it would lead the way to expanded use of audio-video technology for leave applications from other locations across Canada. Technology has brought us long past what we imagined in the 1980s. However, not all improvements in access to justice are technologically driven. That is why I read with interest your comments about the SCC considering hearings outside Ottawa. With the Court’s investment in webcasting and availability for broadcasting, viewing a SCC hearing is within reach of many Canadians who have the financial and technological resources to access television or the internet. However, additional dimensions of understanding and appreciation of the SCC’s work are available for those able to attend in person. The CBA supports a principled approach to occasional SCC sittings outside Ottawa, taking several factors into consideration: the relationship to the region where the hearing would be held; the cost to the parties; opportunities for public engagement and education; and public perception of the stressors in the justice system generally.
    [Show full text]