Download Annual Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
James-H-Graham-Form-2020-F
2020 - Prix du mérite James. H. Graham Date limite: le 13 septembre 2019 Ce prix du mérite a été institué en l'honneur du Dr James H. Graham, secrétaire-général du Collège royal de 1953 à 1979. Le prix est présenté à une personne dont les réalisations remarquables reflètent les buts et objectifs du Collège royal. Objectifs • Le Comité des prix et bourses du Collège royal, qui sélectionne le récipiendaire chaque année lors de sa réunion à l'automne, peut ajouter d'autres noms à la liste des candidats. • Le Comité des prix peut aussi mener sa propre recherche. • Un prix seulement sera décerné durant une année donnée. Il ne sera pas attribué nécessairement chaque année, mais sur décision du Comité des prix et bourses. Admissibilité • Il n’est pas nécessaire que cette personne soit médecin. • Le candidat ne peut poser lui-même sa candidature. • D’après les paramètres établis, les réalisations du candidat doivent être remarquables et refléter la vision, mission et les priorités stratégiques du Collège royal. La contribution des candidats, qui ne sont pas tenus d’être des médecins, pourrait être apportée dans divers domaines, notamment : • Soins aux patients • Santé/bien-être de la société • Santé internationale/mondiale • Formation médicale postdoctorale • Développement professionnel continu • Politiques de la santé • Professionnalisme/bénévolat (p.ex., bénévole du Collège royal ou d’une ANS) • Santé et bien-être des médecins/résidents • Autres domaines Le plan stratégique fournit des renseignements supplémentaires sur les priorités du Collège royal. Pour aider le Comité des prix et bourses à évaluer les mérites du candidat proposé, nous recommandons d’utiliser les lignes directrices et les documents suivants lors de la préparation et de la soumission des dossiers de candidature : • Une lettre de présentation du proposant principal justifiant la mise en candidature et décrivant la contribution du candidat. -
Advancing Health Care
Centre universitaire de santé McGill McGill University Health Centre Advancing Health Care Annual Report | 2 0 0 8 - 2 0 0 9 Table of Contents The Best Care for Life 1 Message from the Chairman of the Board of Directors 2 Message from the Director General and CEO 3 Vision, Mission, Values 4 Stats at a Glance 5 2008-2009 Year in Review 6-7 Clinical & Research Firsts 8-9 Advancing Health Care 10-11 Home-based care improving quality of life... 12-13 Nationwide leading pain program providing relief… 14-15 Maintaining quality of life as long as possible… 16-17 Advances in cardiac care paving bright futures… 18-19 Patient care always one step ahead… 20-21 New technology breaking down barriers… 22-23 Research 24-25 Teaching 26-27 The Redevelopment Project 28-29 Foundations 30-31 Auxiliaries & Volunteers 32-33 Awards & Honours 34-35 Board of Directors 36 Financial Results 37-40 Financial Data 41 Statistical Data 42-43 Acknowledgements 44 Annual Report 2008-2009 The Best Care For Life The McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) is a comprehensive academic health institution with an international reputation for excellence in clinical programs, research and teaching. Its partner hospitals are the Montreal Children’s, the Montreal General, the Royal Victoria, the Montreal Neurological Hospital/Institute, the Montreal Chest Institute as well as the Lachine Hospital and Camille- Lefebvre Pavillion. Building on our tradition of medical leadership, the MUHC continues to shape the course of academic medicine by attracting clinical and research authorities from around the world, by training the next generation of medical professionals, and continuing to provide the best care for life to people of all ages. -
K:\CASC\Public Services\FA Finalized\Political and Social
RT. HON. JOE CLARK MG 26 R 4 LEADER OF THE OPPOSITION, 1980-1983, SERIES MG 26 R 4-1 Leader of the Opposition, 1980-1983, Correspondence Sub-Series Vol. File/Dossier Subject/Sujet Date FILE NUMBERS 1 0060 001-010 - 0063 371-380 2 0063-381-390 - 0064 151-160 3 0064 161-170 - 0072 021-030 4 0072 031-040 - 0085 001-010 5 0085 011-020 - 0101 001-010 6 0101 011-020 - 0112 041-050 7 0112 051-060 - 0120 091-100 8 0120 101-110 - 0128 001-010 9 0128 011-020 - 0134 051-060 10 0134 061-070 - 0144 011-020 11 0144 021-030 - 0154 051-060 12 0154 061-070 - 0162 001-010 13 0162 011-020 - 0169 001-010 14 0169 011-020 - 0178 041-050 350 RT. HON. JOE CLARK MG 26 R 4-1 Vol. File/Dossier Subject/Sujet Date 15 0178 051-060 - 0189 041-050 16 0189 051-060 - 0197 081-090 17 0198 001-010 - 0204 071-080 18 0204 081-090 - 0210 031-040 19 0210 041-050 - 0224 001-010 20 0224 011-020 - 0235 021-030 21 0238 001-010 - 0253 011-020 22 0253 021-030 - 0263 011-020 23 0263 021-030 - 0273 041-050 24 0273 051-060 - 0282 021-030 25 0282 031-040 - 0288 061-070 26 0288 071-080 - 0294 021 030 27 0294 031-040 - 0298 011-020 28 0298 021-030 - 0304 011-020 29 0309 021-030 - 0309 021-030 30 0304 031-040 - 0312 051-060 31 0312 061-070 - 0319 041-050 32 0319 091-100 - 0325 031-040 33 0325 041-050 - 0332 021-030 34 0332 031-040 - 0338 011-020 35 0338 021-030 - 0345 031-040 36 0345 041-050 - 0352 001-010 37 0352 011-020 - 0364 051-060 38 0364 061-070 - 1012 011-020 39 1012 021-030 - 1019 031-040 MG 26 R 4-1 RT. -
Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: a 10-Year Democratic Audit 2014 Canliidocs 33319 Adam M
The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference Volume 67 (2014) Article 4 Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit 2014 CanLIIDocs 33319 Adam M. Dodek Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/sclr This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Citation Information Dodek, Adam M.. "Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit." The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference 67. (2014). http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/sclr/vol67/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The uS preme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit* Adam M. Dodek** 2014 CanLIIDocs 33319 The way in which Justice Rothstein was appointed marks an historic change in how we appoint judges in this country. It brought unprecedented openness and accountability to the process. The hearings allowed Canadians to get to know Justice Rothstein through their members of Parliament in a way that was not previously possible.1 — The Rt. Hon. Stephen Harper, PC [J]udicial appointments … [are] a critical part of the administration of justice in Canada … This is a legacy issue, and it will live on long after those who have the temporary stewardship of this position are no longer there. -
Year in Review
2 0 Year in Review 1Supreme 9 Court of Canada Cour suprême du Canada Find the Visit our Like us on Follow us on Supreme website at Facebook at Twitter at scc-csc.ca facebook.com/ twitter.com/SCC_eng Court of Supreme Canada CourtofCanada online! This was the very first photo ever taken of the current judges together. It was taken in the library of the Winnipeg Law Courts on September 23, 2019. © Supreme Court of Canada (2020) Front cover: Grand Hall, Supreme Court of Canada All photos (except pages 8-9, bottom photo on page 16, left-hand photos on page 17, and page 18): Supreme Court of Canada Collection Photo credits: Pages 4-5: Justices Abella and Côté – Philippe Landreville, photographer | Justice Karakatsanis – Jessica Deeks Photography | Justices Gascon, Brown, and Rowe – Andrew Balfour Photography Page 7: Cochrane Photography Page 8-9: True North Sports + Entertainment The Supreme Court of Canada emblem is a symbol of the Court as the highest judicial Page 16: Senate of Canada institution in Canada. It was designed nearly a century ago by the Page 17 - left side, top: Supreme Court of the United Kingdom distinguished Montreal architect Ernest Cormier, and can be found emblazoned Page 17 - left side, bottom: Embassy of Canada to Japan in the marble floor of the Court’s Grand Hall leading to the Main Courtroom. Page 18: Shannon VanRaes/Winnipeg Free Press As its emblem, it represents the Court’s key values of justice, independence, integrity, ISSN 2562-4776 (Online) transparency, and bilingualism. A Message from the Chief Justice When I became Chief Justice just over two years ago, I committed to making the Court more open and understandable, and to enhancing access to justice for everyone. -
Year in Review Supreme Court of Canada Cour Suprême Du Canada Find the Supreme Court of Canada Online
2020Year in Review Supreme Court of Canada Cour suprême du Canada Find the Supreme Court of Canada online Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Visit our website at SupremeCourtofCanada @SCC_eng www.scc-csc.ca Current bench of the Supreme Court of Canada Photo credits: All photos (except photo on page 9): Supreme Court of Canada Collection Page 3: Cochrane Photography Page 9: Speech from the Throne – PMO-CPM Pages 10 and 11: Justices Abella and Côté – Philippe Landreville, photographer | Justice Karakatsanis – Jessica Deeks Photography | Justices Brown and Rowe – Andrew Balfour Photography The Supreme Court of Canada emblem is a symbol of the Court as Page 28: Justices Brown, Abella et Kasirer – the highest judicial institution in Canada. It was designed nearly Justice Andromache Karakatsanis a century ago by the distinguished Montreal architect Ernest Supreme CourtSupreme Canada of Cormier, and can be found emblazoned in the marble floor of the Court’s Grand Hall leading to the Main Courtroom. © Supreme Court of Canada (2021) The emblem represents the Court’s key values of justice, ISSN 2562-4776 (Print) independence, integrity, transparency and bilingualism. Message from the Chief Justice Along with millions of Canadians in 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada found innovative ways to pivot, adapt and persevere through a global pandemic. Our dedicated employees introduced new technologies, streamlined processes and implemented protocols in collaboration with public health authorities to ensure everyone’s safety and health while serving Canadians. I am proud of the Court’s agility and commitment to maintain access to justice throughout a devastating public health crisis. -
Amity Visit to Canada 2019 Ju
Programme Overview Wednesday 18 September 2019 (Ottawa) 17:00 - Treasurer’s Lecture by The Hon Justice Rosalie Silberman Abella, Supreme Court of Canada at the National Arts Centre, followed by a reception and dinner CDN$195per ticket Friday 20 September 2019 (Toronto) 14:00 - Appellate Advocacy Discussion and Moot at the Rosalie Silberman Abella Moot Courtroom, University of Toronto Free to attend 19:00 - Bench Call (Chief Justice of Canada and Sheila Block) and dinner at Osgoode Hall CDN$225 per ticket Saturday 21 September 2019 (Toronto) 09:30 - Seminars at Osgoode Hall Free to attend 17:30 - Farewell reception at the CN Tower Free to attend For booking and payment information please click here For more information please contact the Inn’s Membership Manager, Oliver Muncey, at [email protected] 2 Wednesday 18 September 2019 (Ottawa) Treasurer’s Lecture The Hon Justice Rosalie Silberman Abella, Supreme Court of Canada A Generation of Justice’s Journey: Now what? Venue - National Arts Centre 17:00 - Lecture 18:00 - Reception 19:00 - Dinner 21:30 - Carriages Dress code – Lounge suite/business attire Guests welcome CDN$195per ticket For booking and payment information please click here 3 Friday 20 September 2019 (Toronto) Moot and Appellate Advocacy Discussion Venue - Rosalie Silberman Abella Moot Courtroom, University of Toronto 14:00 - Introduction and Appellate Advocacy Discussion Chair: Andrew Hochhauser QC, Essex Court Chambers Speakers: The Rt Hon The Lord Judge, former Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales The Hon Justice Graeme Mew, Superior Court of Justice 14:30 - Moot before the Supreme Court Judges: The Rt Hon Sir Stanley Burnton, One Essex Court and former Lord Justice of Appeal The Hon Justice Kathryn N. -
September 14, 2020 Hon. David Lametti, PC, MP Minister of Justice
September 14, 2020 Hon. David Lametti, PC, MP Minister of Justice and Attorney-General of Canada House of Commons Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6 Dear Minister Lametti, Re: Appointment of BIPOC judges to Canada’s federal courts We are members of the legal community that represent and/or support clients in Canada’s federal courts. We are writing to urge you to take immediate action by appointing Black, Indigenous and People of Colour (BIPOC) judges to the federal courts and amending the criteria for their appointment to ensure the experiences of BIPOC applicants are valued. It is undeniable that the current racial composition of our federal courts does not reflect the diversity of Canada. Just last month, Supreme Court Chief Justice Richard Wagner highlighted the importance of racial representation on the bench in stating, “All Canadians should be able to see themselves reflected in their justice system. Justice should not make a person feel like an outsider or an ‘other’ when they confront it.”1 The legacy of centuries of institutional racism has led to a dominantly white federal bench making decisions governing the actions and behaviors of BIPOC communities, without ever having experienced the prejudices and racial biases faced by these communities. In the Federal Court’s current roster of 35 judges and 9 supernumeraries, there are only two BIPOC judges. This is especially troubling given that 63% of the Federal Court’s docket deals with immigration, refugee and Indigenous cases, areas in which almost all applicants are BIPOC.2 The Federal Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada, despite commitments to racial inclusion, continue to be all white benches. -
Industry Update on Electricity, Natural Gas and Telecommunications
Industry Update on Electricity, Natural Gas, and Telecommunications GPT2021-0562 ATTACHMENT 1 ENERGY PRICES AND MARKETS Natural Gas The 2021 March gas cost flow-through rate was $4.10 per gigajoule. Prices are forecast to remain relatively flat through 2021. Electricity The ENMAX regulated rate option price for 2021 March was 7.34 cents per kilowatt-hour. The month to date all-hours average power pool price for 2021 April 5 was 6.22 cents per kilowatt-hour. For reference, the all-hours average price for 2020 April was 2.89 cents per Page 1 of 4 ISC: Unrestricted Industry Update on Electricity, Natural Gas, and Telecommunications GPT2021-0562 ATTACHMENT 1 kilowatt-hour. Power pool prices are forecast to stay between 6 and 7 cents per kilowatt-hour for the remainder of 2021. UTILITIES AND INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENTS Supreme Court rules Canadian Carbon Tax is constitutional On 2021 March 25 in a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the Federal Government’s national carbon tax is entirely constitutional, putting an end to the two-year legal proceeding with conservative premiers over the policy. In the 405-page decision, Chief Justice Richard Wagner, speaking on behalf of the majority, found the Federal Government’s 2018 Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act — which requires provinces to meet minimum national standards to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by applying a price on the use of fossil fuels by large industries or consumers fueling their cars — “is critical to our response to an existential threat to human life in Canada and around the world.” Justice Malcolm Rowe and Justice Russell Brown wrote lengthy dissents, arguing the majority decision would give Ottawa precedent to set minimum national standards in other areas of provincial jurisdiction, “including intra-provincial trade and commerce, health, and the management of natural resources.” “This is a model of federalism that rejects our Constitution and rewrites the rules of Confederation,” Brown wrote. -
Killam Prizes | Prix Killam
Killam Prizes | Prix Killam Year | Winners | University | Discipline Année Gagnants Université 2021 Michel Bouvier Université de Montréal Health Sciences | sciences de la santé Stephen R. Gill York University Social Sciences | sciences sociales Gilbert Laporte HEC Montréal Engineering | génie Arthur Ripstein University of Toronto Humanities | sciences humaines Douglas Stephan University of Toronto Natural Sciences | sciences de la nature 2020 Cecilia Benoit University of Victoria Social Sciences | sciences sociales Sarah Carter University of Alberta Humanities | sciences humaines Alan Evans Montreal Neurological Institute Health Sciences | sciences de la santé Ted Sargent University of Toronto Engineering | génie Barbara Sherwood Lollar University of Toronto Natural Sciences | sciences de la nature 2019 Yoshua Bengio Université de Montréal Natural Sciences | sciences de la nature André Blais Université de Montréal Social Sciences | sciences sociales Keith W. Hipel University of Waterloo Engineering | génie Stephen W. Scherer University of Toronto Health Sciences | sciences de la santé Lynne Viola University of Toronto Humanities | sciences humaines 2018 André Gaudreault Université de Montréal Humanities | sciences humaines Vladimir Hachinski Western University Health Sciences | sciences de la santé Walter Herzog University of Calgary Engineering | génie James Pinfold University of Alberta Natural Sciences | sciences de la nature Janet Werker University of British Columbia Social Sciences | sciences sociales Canada Council for the Arts -
Le Libre-Échange Multipliera Les Fusions Dans L'industrie Du Plastique
TRAITEMENT 0E LA I Confiez le traitement 4e vos oelet A des ipéclallitM CVTRDn.ES 382-0820 AllMnrict<i«l«PMe<)«puiip!u»dt1l»«!l I • LA PRESSE, MONTRÉAL, JEUD119 NOVEMBRE 1987 Délit d'Initié : Le libre-échange multipliera les Blalkle plaide fusions dans l'industrie du plastique non coupable Le regroupement de services et de compagnies a déjà commencé Rémi Frenette, aussi président ces jusqu'en l'An 2000 alors que de la compagnie Techmire, décla le plastique, une industrie pour eter Blaikie a plaidé non- re que les entrepreneurs québé tant née au lendemain de la guer P coupable hier aux accusa e libre-échange contribuera à cois sont des «patenteux» et que re, prendra la tête des manufactu tions de délit d'initié portées L multiplier les fusions et les la technologie de leurs PME se ré riers. contre lui par la Commission acquisitions, graduellement, dans vèle souvent plus avant-gardiste l'industrie du plastique du Qué que celle des firmes canadiennes Trois des huit secteurs du plas des valeurs mobilières du Qué tique connaissent une croissance bec. Il expliquera sa position bec. et surtout que celle des américai nes. exceptionnelle: l'automobile, les au cours d'audiences prévues Lors d'une rencontre de presse tuyaux et les sacs d'emballage, pour le 18 janvier prochain. préparatoire à ExpoPlast 87 et La SPI et Statistique Canada avec des gains respectifs de 149, CanPlast'87, tenues à Montréal à n'arrivent déjà pas à suivre la per 42 et 40 p. cent, de 1983 à 1985. L'ancien président du parti la fin du mois et au début de dé formance hors de l'ordinaire de cembre, le président des transfor conservateur du Canada et un l'industrie au niveau des statisti Exporter 50% des adversaires du premier mi mateurs du plastique du Québec, ques et le libre-échange devien nistre Brian Mulroitey dans la Rémi F renette, explique que le re dra «un élixir» qui accélérera en Les PME québécoises, en plus course au leadership de 1982 groupement de services et de core la tendance. -
Canadian Judicial Nomination Processes and the Press: ‘Interesting, in a Sleepy Sort of Way’
Oñati Socio-legal Series, v. 4, n. 4 (2014) – Law in the Age of Media Logic ISSN: 2079-5971 Canadian Judicial Nomination Processes and the Press: ‘Interesting, in a Sleepy Sort of Way’ ∗ DAVID SCHNEIDERMAN Schneiderman, D., 2014. Canadian Judicial Nomination Processes and the Press: ‘Interesting, in a Sleepy Sort of Way’. Oñati Socio-legal Series [online], 4 (4), 685-708. Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2511239 Abstract Most of the recent appointees to the Supreme Court of Canada have participated in a new Canadian judicial nomination process initiated by the current Conservative government. As originally formulated in early policy platforms, the process was intended to mimic features of US Senate judicial confirmation hearings and so would highlight the distinction (popular in US political discourse) between ‘applying’ and ‘making’ law. This led to widespread fears that any new public process would politicize judicial appointments and functions at the Supreme Court. The process turned out to be much more tepid than anticipated and so raises questions about what Canadians may have learned as a consequence of this new nomination process. This paper undertakes a qualitative analysis of reporting of four nomination processes from a select number of Canadian newspapers. The main object is to determine the degree to which readers might have been alerted to the distinction between law and politics or, put another way, between judicial activism and restraint. It turns out that this framing was not dominant in the coverage and that, instead, distinctive Canadian political preoccupations, like language politics, got channeled through this new political opportunity structure.