Duke University Dissertation Template

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Duke University Dissertation Template Regulation of Eukaryotic Translation Initiation by Signal Transduction by Mayya Shveygert Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Matthias Gromeier, Supervisor ___________________________ Christopher Nicchitta ___________________________ Jeffrey Rathmell ___________________________ Micah Luftig Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology in the Graduate School of Duke University 2012 i v ABSTRACT Regulation of Eukaryotic Translation Initiation by Signal Transduction by Mayya Shveygert Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Matthias Gromeier, Supervisor ___________________________ Christopher Nicchitta ___________________________ Jeffrey Rathmell ___________________________ Micah Luftig An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology in the Graduate School of Duke University 2012 Copyright by Mayya Shveygert 2012 Abstract Eukaryotic translation initiation is a rate-limiting step of protein synthesis and is controlled by signal transduction in response to various extracellular cues and stresses. This thesis is focused on the eukaryotic initiation factor 4G (eIF4G), which participates in multiple steps of initiation: (i) eIF4G interaction with polyA-binding protein (PABP) links the 5’ pre-initiation complex to the 3’ poly(A) tail of mRNAs; (ii) eIF4G recruits 40S ribosomal subunit to mRNAs through interactions with the m7-G cap binding protein eIF4E; (iii) eIF4G binds to the eIF4E kinase, mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) interacting kinase 1 (Mnk1), modulating eIF4E phosphorylation. I studied how eIF4G function is affected by viral infection, mitogenic stimulation and during mitosis. First, I reported that herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) infection leads to re- localization of PABP to the nucleus, dissociating it from translation initiation machinery. Next, I showed that MAPK-mediated phosphorylation of Mnk1 leads to Mnk1 conformational changes, enhancing its binding to eIF4G and, hence, increasing phosphorylation of its substrate, eIF4E. Finally, I demonstrated that Cdk1/cyclin B1 directly phosphorylates eIF4G in mitosis and speculated on the role of this phosphorylation event in mitotic translation. In summary, my work demonstrated that eIF4G plays key roles in the regulation of the translational response to viral infection, growth signaling and cell cycle progression. iv Dedication Dedicated to my parents. v Contents Abstract .................................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables............................................................................................................................ xi List of Figures ......................................................................................................................... xii List of abbreviations.............................................................................................................. xiv Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... xviii 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Overview of translational regulation ......................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Post-transcriptional control of gene expression .................................................... 1 1.1.2 Regulation of protein synthesis.............................................................................. 3 1.1.3 Stages of translation ................................................................................................ 5 1.1.4 Translation initiation ............................................................................................... 5 1.2 Growth signaling pathways control translation initiation........................................ 9 1.2.1 Overview of the receptor-induced signaling pathways ....................................... 9 1.2.1 mTOR ..................................................................................................................... 11 1.2.1.1 Upstream activators of mTOR ...................................................................... 12 1.2.1.2 mTORC1 targets translational machinery .................................................... 15 1.2.2 Ras/MAPK pathway ............................................................................................. 17 1.3 eIF4G is a central protein for translation initiation ................................................. 21 1.3.1 Structure of eIF4G ................................................................................................. 21 1.3.2 eIF4G isoforms....................................................................................................... 25 vi 1.3.3 Initiation factors that interact with eIF4G ........................................................... 27 1.3.3.1 Cap-binding protein eIF4E ............................................................................ 27 1.3.3.2 RNA helicase eIF4A ....................................................................................... 28 1.3.3.3 Multi-subunit complex eIF3 .......................................................................... 29 1.3.3.4 Poly A-binding protein PABP ....................................................................... 30 1.3.4.4 eIF4G binds translational repressors ............................................................ 32 1.4 Role of eIF4G in biology and disease........................................................................ 33 1.4.1 Depletion of eIF4G leads to growth arrest phenotypes...................................... 33 1.4.2 The role of eIF4G in gametogenesis and in neurons .......................................... 37 1.4.3 Over-expression of eIF4G promotes tumorigenesis ........................................... 38 1.4.4 Signal transduction to eIF4G ................................................................................ 39 1.5 Translation in mitosis ................................................................................................ 42 1.5.1 Global down-regulation of translation in mitosis ............................................... 43 1.5.2 Selective upregulation of certain mRNAs in mitosis.......................................... 45 1.6 Regulation of translation during viral infection ...................................................... 48 1.6.1 Herpes simplex virus 1 ......................................................................................... 49 1.6.2 HSV-1 infection induces host protein synthesis shut-off ................................... 51 1.6.3 Host defense response and viral countermeasures ............................................ 52 2. Materials and Methods ...................................................................................................... 57 2.1 Cell culture and stable cell lines ................................................................................ 57 2.2 Expression constructs ................................................................................................ 58 2.2.1 Cloning for Chapter 3.1 ........................................................................................ 58 vii 2.2.2 Cloning for Chapter 3.2 ........................................................................................ 58 2.2.3 Cloning for Chapter 3.3 ........................................................................................ 60 2.3 Recombinant proteins ................................................................................................ 63 2.4 Immunofluorescence ................................................................................................. 63 2.5 DNA transfections ..................................................................................................... 64 2.6 Kinase inhibitors and activators ............................................................................... 65 2.7 m7G cap pull down, glutathione pull down, immunoprecipitation...................... 65 2.7.1 Chapter 3.1 ............................................................................................................. 65 2.7.2 Chapter 3.2 ............................................................................................................. 66 2.7.3 Chapter 3.3 ............................................................................................................. 67 2.8 Immunoblotting and antibodies ............................................................................... 68 2.8.1 Antibodies for Chapter 3.1 ................................................................................... 68 2.8.2 Antibodies for Chapter 3.2 ................................................................................... 69 2.8.3 Antibodies for Chapter 3.3 ................................................................................... 69 2.9 In vitro kinase assay ................................................................................................... 70 2.9.1.
Recommended publications
  • Structural Characterization of the Human Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 3 Protein Complex by Mass Spectrometry*□S
    Supplemental Material can be found at: http://www.mcponline.org/cgi/content/full/M600399-MCP200 /DC1 Research Structural Characterization of the Human Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 3 Protein Complex by Mass Spectrometry*□S Eugen Damoc‡, Christopher S. Fraser§, Min Zhou¶, Hortense Videler¶, Greg L. Mayeurʈ, John W. B. Hersheyʈ, Jennifer A. Doudna§, Carol V. Robinson¶**, and Julie A. Leary‡ ‡‡ Protein synthesis in mammalian cells requires initiation The initiation phase of eukaryotic protein synthesis involves factor eIF3, an ϳ800-kDa protein complex that plays a formation of an 80 S ribosomal complex containing the initi- Downloaded from central role in binding of initiator methionyl-tRNA and ator methionyl-tRNAi bound to the initiation codon in the mRNA to the 40 S ribosomal subunit to form the 48 S mRNA. This is a multistep process promoted by proteins initiation complex. The eIF3 complex also prevents pre- called eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs).1 Currently at least 12 mature association of the 40 and 60 S ribosomal subunits eIFs, composed of at least 29 distinct subunits, have been and interacts with other initiation factors involved in start identified (1). Mammalian eIF3, the largest initiation factor, is a codon selection. The molecular mechanisms by which multisubunit complex with an apparent molecular mass of www.mcponline.org eIF3 exerts these functions are poorly understood. Since ϳ800 kDa. This protein complex plays an essential role in its initial characterization in the 1970s, the exact size, translation by binding directly to the 40 S ribosomal subunit composition, and post-translational modifications of and promoting formation of the 43 S preinitiation complex ⅐ ⅐ mammalian eIF3 have not been rigorously determined.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • 4-6 Weeks Old Female C57BL/6 Mice Obtained from Jackson Labs Were Used for Cell Isolation
    Methods Mice: 4-6 weeks old female C57BL/6 mice obtained from Jackson labs were used for cell isolation. Female Foxp3-IRES-GFP reporter mice (1), backcrossed to B6/C57 background for 10 generations, were used for the isolation of naïve CD4 and naïve CD8 cells for the RNAseq experiments. The mice were housed in pathogen-free animal facility in the La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology and were used according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and use Committee. Preparation of cells: Subsets of thymocytes were isolated by cell sorting as previously described (2), after cell surface staining using CD4 (GK1.5), CD8 (53-6.7), CD3ε (145- 2C11), CD24 (M1/69) (all from Biolegend). DP cells: CD4+CD8 int/hi; CD4 SP cells: CD4CD3 hi, CD24 int/lo; CD8 SP cells: CD8 int/hi CD4 CD3 hi, CD24 int/lo (Fig S2). Peripheral subsets were isolated after pooling spleen and lymph nodes. T cells were enriched by negative isolation using Dynabeads (Dynabeads untouched mouse T cells, 11413D, Invitrogen). After surface staining for CD4 (GK1.5), CD8 (53-6.7), CD62L (MEL-14), CD25 (PC61) and CD44 (IM7), naïve CD4+CD62L hiCD25-CD44lo and naïve CD8+CD62L hiCD25-CD44lo were obtained by sorting (BD FACS Aria). Additionally, for the RNAseq experiments, CD4 and CD8 naïve cells were isolated by sorting T cells from the Foxp3- IRES-GFP mice: CD4+CD62LhiCD25–CD44lo GFP(FOXP3)– and CD8+CD62LhiCD25– CD44lo GFP(FOXP3)– (antibodies were from Biolegend). In some cases, naïve CD4 cells were cultured in vitro under Th1 or Th2 polarizing conditions (3, 4).
    [Show full text]
  • CHARACTERIZING the INTERACTION BETWEEN PDCD4 and Eif3 with RESPECT to TRANSLATION REGULATION
    CHARACTERIZING THE INTERACTION BETWEEN PDCD4 AND eIF3 WITH RESPECT TO TRANSLATION REGULATION DIVYA SHARMA KHANDIGA Master of Science, Bangalore University, India 2009 A Thesis/Project Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of the University of Lethbridge in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry University of Lethbridge LETHBRIDGE, ALBERTA, CANADA © Divya Sharma Khandiga, 2017 CHARACTERIZING THE INTERACTION BETWEEN PDCD4 AND eIF3 WITH RESPECT TO TRANSLATION REGULATION DIVYA SHARMA KHANDIGA Date of Defense: December 12, 2017 Dr. N. Thakor Assistant Professor Ph.D. Thesis Supervisor Dr. M. Roussel Professor Ph.D. Thesis Co-supervisor Dr. U. Kothe Associate Professor Ph.D. Thesis Examination Committee Member Dr. R. Golsteyn Associate Professor Ph.D. Thesis Examination Committee Member Dr. R. Fahlman Professor Ph.D. External Examiner University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta Dr. M. Gerken Professor Ph.D. Chair, Thesis Examination Committee Dedication To my beloved family and friends, My inspiration, my parents Subraya Sharma and Kamala Sharma My dearly loved husband Samarth, sister Dr. Lakshmi and brother-in-law Dr. Pradeep My cute little niece Mithali and nephew Aathreya My adorable brother Dr. Ganesh, sister Dr. Sharadha, Silly Vidya and little angels My loving cousins and in-laws I am grateful to have them in my life, it is their well wishes, teachings, support and love that have enabled me to achieve success and happiness in life. iii Abstract Programmed cell death protein 4 (PDCD4) inhibits IRES-mediated translation of anti- apoptotic proteins such as XIAP. PDCD4 was shown to directly interact with the XIAP IRES element and inhibit translation initiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Genes with 5' Terminal Oligopyrimidine Tracts Preferentially Escape Global Suppression of Translation by the SARS-Cov-2 NSP1 Protein
    Downloaded from rnajournal.cshlp.org on September 28, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Genes with 5′ terminal oligopyrimidine tracts preferentially escape global suppression of translation by the SARS-CoV-2 Nsp1 protein Shilpa Raoa, Ian Hoskinsa, Tori Tonna, P. Daniela Garciaa, Hakan Ozadama, Elif Sarinay Cenika, Can Cenika,1 a Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA 1Corresponding author: [email protected] Key words: SARS-CoV-2, Nsp1, MeTAFlow, translation, ribosome profiling, RNA-Seq, 5′ TOP, Ribo-Seq, gene expression 1 Downloaded from rnajournal.cshlp.org on September 28, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Abstract Viruses rely on the host translation machinery to synthesize their own proteins. Consequently, they have evolved varied mechanisms to co-opt host translation for their survival. SARS-CoV-2 relies on a non-structural protein, Nsp1, for shutting down host translation. However, it is currently unknown how viral proteins and host factors critical for viral replication can escape a global shutdown of host translation. Here, using a novel FACS-based assay called MeTAFlow, we report a dose-dependent reduction in both nascent protein synthesis and mRNA abundance in cells expressing Nsp1. We perform RNA-Seq and matched ribosome profiling experiments to identify gene-specific changes both at the mRNA expression and translation level. We discover that a functionally-coherent subset of human genes are preferentially translated in the context of Nsp1 expression. These genes include the translation machinery components, RNA binding proteins, and others important for viral pathogenicity. Importantly, we uncovered a remarkable enrichment of 5′ terminal oligo-pyrimidine (TOP) tracts among preferentially translated genes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eif3 Complex of Typanosoma Brucei: Composition Conservation Does Not Imply the Conservation of Structural Assembly and Subunits Function
    Downloaded from rnajournal.cshlp.org on October 1, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 1 The eIF3 complex of Typanosoma brucei: composition conservation does not imply the 2 conservation of structural assembly and subunits function 3 4 Kunrao Li,1,2 Shuru Zhou,1,2 Qixuan Guo,3 Xin Chen,1,2 Dehua Lai,2,4 Zhaorong Lun,2,4,5 and 5 Xuemin Guo1,2,5 6 7 1Institute of Human Virology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, 8 Guangzhou, China 9 2Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Control (Sun Yat-Sen University), Ministry of Education, 10 Guangzhou, China 11 3Chengde Nursing Vocational College, Chende, China 12 4Center for Parasitic Organisms, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, 13 Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China 14 15 5Corresponding author. Email, [email protected]; or [email protected] 16 K.L. and S.Z. contributed equally to this work 17 18 Running head: Characterization of the eIF3 of Trypanosoma brucei 19 Keywords: Translation, Eukaryotic initiation factor 3, Trypanosome 20 1 Downloaded from rnajournal.cshlp.org on October 1, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 21 ABSTRACT 22 The multisubunit eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (eIF3) plays multiple roles in translation, but 23 poorly understood in trypanosomes. The putative subunits eIF3a and eIF3f of Trypanosoma 24 brucei (TbIF3a and TbIF3f) were overexpressed and purified, and 11 subunits were identified, 25 TbIF3a through l minus j, which form a tight complex. Both TbIF3a and TbIF3f are essential for 26 viability of T. brucei. RNAi knockdown of either of them severely reduced total translation and 27 the ratio of polysome/80S peak area.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2019/079361 Al 25 April 2019 (25.04.2019) W 1P O PCT
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization I International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2019/079361 Al 25 April 2019 (25.04.2019) W 1P O PCT (51) International Patent Classification: CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DJ, DK, DM, DO, C12Q 1/68 (2018.01) A61P 31/18 (2006.01) DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, C12Q 1/70 (2006.01) HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JO, JP, KE, KG, KH, KN, KP, KR, KW, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, (21) International Application Number: MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, PCT/US2018/056167 OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, (22) International Filing Date: SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, 16 October 2018 (16. 10.2018) TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (25) Filing Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (26) Publication Language: English GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, TZ, (30) Priority Data: UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ, 62/573,025 16 October 2017 (16. 10.2017) US TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, ΓΕ , IS, IT, LT, LU, LV, (71) Applicant: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SI, SK, SM, TECHNOLOGY [US/US]; 77 Massachusetts Avenue, TR), OAPI (BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM, GA, GN, GQ, GW, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 (US).
    [Show full text]
  • EIF4E Antibody Cat
    EIF4E Antibody Cat. No.: 60-600 EIF4E Antibody Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded human breast carcinoma reacted with EIF4E antibody (N-term), which was peroxidase- conjugated to the secondary antibody, followed by DAB staining. Specifications HOST SPECIES: Rabbit SPECIES REACTIVITY: Human Predicted species reactivity based on immunogen sequence: Zebrafish, Bovine, Mouse, HOMOLOGY: Rabbit, Rat, Xenopus This EIF4E antibody is generated from rabbits immunized with a KLH conjugated synthetic IMMUNOGEN: peptide between 32-61 amino acids from the N-terminal region of human EIF4E. TESTED APPLICATIONS: IHC-P, WB For WB starting dilution is: 1:1000 APPLICATIONS: For IHC-P starting dilution is: 1:50~100 September 27, 2021 1 https://www.prosci-inc.com/eif4e-antibody-60-600.html PREDICTED MOLECULAR 25 kDa WEIGHT: Properties This antibody is prepared by Saturated Ammonium Sulfate (SAS) precipitation followed by PURIFICATION: dialysis CLONALITY: Polyclonal ISOTYPE: Rabbit Ig CONJUGATE: Unconjugated PHYSICAL STATE: Liquid BUFFER: Supplied in PBS with 0.09% (W/V) sodium azide. CONCENTRATION: batch dependent Store at 4˚C for three months and -20˚C, stable for up to one year. As with all antibodies STORAGE CONDITIONS: care should be taken to avoid repeated freeze thaw cycles. Antibodies should not be exposed to prolonged high temperatures. Additional Info OFFICIAL SYMBOL: EIF4E Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E, eIF-4E, eIF4E, eIF-4F 25 kDa subunit, mRNA cap- ALTERNATE NAMES: binding protein, EIF4E, EIF4EL1, EIF4F ACCESSION NO.: P06730 PROTEIN GI NO.: 1352435 GENE ID: 1977 USER NOTE: Optimal dilutions for each application to be determined by the researcher. Background and References eIF4F is a multi-subunit complex, the composition of which varies with external and internal environmental conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 3 Plays Distinct Roles at The
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 plays distinct roles at the mRNA entry and exit channels of the ribosomal preinitiation complex Colin Echeverrı´aAitken1, Petra Beznoskova´ 2, Vladislava Vlcˇkova2, Wen-Ling Chiu3†, Fujun Zhou1, Leosˇ Shivaya Vala´ sˇek2*, Alan G Hinnebusch3*, Jon R Lorsch1* 1Laboratory on the Mechanism and Regulation of Protein Synthesis, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States; 2Laboratory of Regulation of Gene Expression, Institute of Microbiology ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic; 3Laboratory of Gene Regulation and Development, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States Abstract Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3) is a central player in recruitment of the pre-initiation complex (PIC) to mRNA. We probed the effects on mRNA recruitment of a library of S. cerevisiae eIF3 functional variants spanning its 5 essential subunits using an in vitro-reconstituted *For correspondence: valasekl@ system. Mutations throughout eIF3 disrupt its interaction with the PIC and diminish its ability to biomed.cas.cz (LSV); [email protected] (AGH); jon. accelerate recruitment to a native yeast mRNA. Alterations to the eIF3a CTD and eIF3b/i/g . [email protected] (JRL) significantly slow mRNA recruitment, and mutations within eIF3b/i/g destabilize eIF2 GTP Met- tRNAi binding to the PIC. Using model mRNAs lacking contacts with the 40S entry or exit channels, Present address: we uncovered a critical role for eIF3 requiring the eIF3a NTD, in stabilizing mRNA interactions at †PharmaEssentia Corp., Taipei, the exit channel, and an ancillary role at the entry channel requiring residues of the eIF3a CTD.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of the Small RNA Transcriptomes of Cell Protrusions and Cell Bodies of Highly Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells Via RNA Sequencing
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS 22: 568, 2021 Characterization of the small RNA transcriptomes of cell protrusions and cell bodies of highly metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma cells via RNA sequencing WENPIN CAI1*, JINGZHANG JI2*, BITING WU2*, KAIXUAN HAO2, PING REN2, YU JIN2, LIHONG YANG2, QINGCHAO TONG2 and ZHIFA SHEN2 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Wen Zhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital; 2Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Genetics, Key Laboratory of Laboratory Medicine, Ministry of Education, School of Laboratory Medicine and Life Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035, P.R. China Received July 11, 2020; Accepted February 23, 2021 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2021.12829 Abstract. Increasing evidence suggest that hepatocellular differentially expressed miRNAs and circRNAs. The interac‑ carcinoma (HCC) HCCLM3 cells initially develop pseudo‑ tion maps between miRNAs and circRNAs were constructed, podia when they metastasize, and microRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) and signaling pathway maps were analyzed to determine the and circular RNAs (circRNAs) have been demonstrated to molecular mechanism and regulation of the differentially serve important roles in the development, progression and expressed miRNAs and circRNAs. Taken together, the results metastasis of cancer. The present study aimed to isolate the of the present study suggest that the Boyden chamber assay cell bodies (CBs) and cell protrusions (CPs) from HCCLM3 can be used to effectively isolate the somatic CBs and CPs of cells, and screen the miRNAs and circRNAs associated with HCC, which can be used to screen the miRNAs and circRNAs HCC infiltration and metastasis in CBs and CPs. The Boyden associated with invasion and metastasis of HCC. chamber assay has been confirmed to effectively isolate the CBs and CPs from HCCLM3 cells via observation of microtu‑ Introduction bule immunofluorescence, DAPI staining and nuclear protein H3 western blotting.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Product Insert (PDF)
    PRODUCT INFORMATION eIF4E (human recombinant) Item No. 15137 Overview and Properties Synonyms: eIF-4F 25 kDa subunit, Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4E, mRNA Cap-binding Protein Source: Recombinant protein expressed in E. coli Amino Acids: 2-217 (full length) Uniprot No.: P06730 Molecular Weight: 25.2 kDa Storage: -80°C (as supplied) Stability: ≥1 year Purity: batch specific (≥55% estimated by SDS-PAGE) Supplied in: 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, containing 100 mM potassium chloride, 2 mM DTT, and 10% glycerol Protein Concentration: batch specific mg/ml Image 1 2 3 4 250 kDa · · · · · · · 150 kDa · · · · · · · 100 kDa · · · · · · · 75 kDa · · · · · · · 50 kDa · · · · · · · 37 kDa · · · · · · · 25 kDa · · · · · · · 20 kDa · · · · · · · 15 kDa · · · · · · · Lane 1: MW Markers Lane 2: eIF4E (human recombinant) (4 µg) Lane 3: eIF4E (human recombinant) (2 µg) Lane 4: eIF4E (human recombinant) (1 µg) Representaõve gel image shown; actual purity may vary between each batch. WARNING CAYMAN CHEMICAL THIS PRODUCT IS FOR RESEARCH ONLY - NOT FOR HUMAN OR VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC OR THERAPEUTIC USE. 1180 EAST ELLSWORTH RD SAFETY DATA ANN ARBOR, MI 48108 · USA This material should be considered hazardous until further information becomes available. Do not ingest, inhale, get in eyes, on skin, or on clothing. Wash thoroughly after handling. Before use, the user must review the complete Safety Data Sheet, which has been sent via email to your institution. PHONE: [800] 364-9897 WARRANTY AND LIMITATION OF REMEDY [734] 971-3335 Buyer agrees to purchase the material subject to Cayman’s Terms and Conditions. Complete Terms and Conditions including Warranty and Limitation of Liability information can be found on our website.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematically Profiling the Expression of Eif3 Subunits in Glioma Reveals
    Chai et al. Cancer Cell Int (2019) 19:155 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-019-0867-1 Cancer Cell International PRIMARY RESEARCH Open Access Systematically profling the expression of eIF3 subunits in glioma reveals the expression of eIF3i has prognostic value in IDH-mutant lower grade glioma Rui‑Chao Chai1,4,6†, Ning Wang2†, Yu‑Zhou Chang3, Ke‑Nan Zhang1,6, Jing‑Jun Li1,6, Jun‑Jie Niu5, Fan Wu1,6*, Yu‑Qing Liu1,6* and Yong‑Zhi Wang1,3,4,6* Abstract Background: Abnormal expression of the eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (eIF3) subunits plays critical roles in tumo‑ rigenesis and progression, and also has potential prognostic value in cancers. However, the expression and clinical implications of eIF3 subunits in glioma remain unknown. Methods: Expression data of eIF3 for patients with gliomas were obtained from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA) (n 272) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (n 595). Cox regression, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves= and Kaplan–Meier analysis were used to study= the prognostic value. Gene oncology (GO) and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were utilized for functional prediction. Results: In both the CGGA and TCGA datasets, the expression levels of eIF3d, eIF3e, eIF3f, eIF3h and eIF3l highly were associated with the IDH mutant status of gliomas. The expression of eIF3b, eIF3i, eIF3k and eIF3m was increased with the tumor grade, and was associated with poorer overall survival [All Hazard ratio (HR) > 1 and P < 0.05]. By contrast, the expression of eIF3a and eIF3l was decreased in higher grade gliomas and was associated with better overall sur‑ vival (Both HR < 1 and P < 0.05).
    [Show full text]