DOCSLIB.ORG

Esoteric Quantization the Esoteric Imagination in David Bohm's Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Esoteric Quantization the Esoteric Imagination in David Bohm's Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Open Research Exeter Esoteric Quantization The Esoteric Imagination in David Bohm’s Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Thesis submitted to the University of Exeter by Gustavo Orlando Fernandez towards the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Western Esotericism January 2016 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. 1 Abstract This thesis aims to explore the relationship between the science, the philosophy and the esoteric imagination of the American physicist David Bohm (1917-1992). Bohm is recognized as one of the most brilliant physicists of his gen- eration. He is famous for his ‘hidden variables’ interpretation of quantum mechanics. Bohm wrote extensively on philosophical and psychological subjects. In his celebrated book Wholeness and the Implicate Order (1882) he introduced the influential ideas of the Explicate and the Implicate orders that are at the core of his process philosophy. Bohm was also a very close disciple of the Indian teacher Jiddu Krishnamurti (1895-1986), whom he recognized to have had an important influence on his thought. Chapter 1 is a general explanation of what I intend to do, why my re- search is filling an important gap, introduce the field of Western esoteri- cism as a scholarly subject and suggesting that it offers a fruitful way of approaching the thought of David Bohm. I also explain my research prin- ciples and a brief description of the philosophical standpoint from which I am approaching the material. Chapter 2 gives a description of the textual sources I used in my re- search. This is followed by a comprehensive literature review. Chapter 3 is a biographical essay where I give an account of Bohm’s life, career, works, major ideas and their development, stressing their sig- nificance for the development of Bohm’s holistic philosophy and his inter- actions with the esoteric. This chapter is an introduction to the main ideas of the dissertation. Chapter 4 revisits the genesis of the Causal Interpretation, Bohm’s first attempt to deal with the interpretation of quantum mechanics. I make em- phasis on the philosophical developments that gave rise to it. I introduce all the relevant physics and give a detailed explanation of the problem of interpretation and Bohm’s first proposal. Chapter 5 is about the philosophical developments in Bohm’s thought brought by the Causal Interpretation. In particular I examine the influence that G. W. F. Hegel (1770-1831) had on Bohm’s thought and explain why I take the view that this is an esoteric influence. Chapter 6 reviews the developments in Bohm’s thought during the 1960’s. I describe Bohm’s search for radically new concepts in physics and his ex- changes with several thinkers ending with his encounter with Jiddu Krish- namurti. Chapters 7 and 8 are devoted to the study of Bohm’s philosophy as he 2 elaborated it after 1960. Chapter 7 concentrates on the idea of the Im- plicate Order and it also studies the Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Bohm’s last version of his interpretation effort, which is based on the Implicate Order. In chapter 8 I examine Bohm’s theory of how the mind and the body are connected through a ladder of consciousness formed by a series of Explicate and Implicate Orders, and finishes with an exposition of Bohm’s dialogue technique. In the last chapter I summarize my conclusions. An appendix is included with a brief overview of Bohm’s legacy. All the relevant details about the esoteric currents that Bohm encountered during his life and that are required to understand our argument are intro- duced as they are needed throughout the main body of the text. 3 Acknowledgements I am deeply indebted to Nicholas Goodrick-Clark, the original super- visor of this thesis. His untimely death deprived us of an enthusiast, re- sourceful and visionary teacher. Andrew Pickering accepted to supervise this thesis along with Nich- olas. He accepted to become my main supervisor when most needed. I am thankful for his friendly support and his many suggestions, always helpful, insightful and to the point. It was a pleasure to work with Andrew. Richard Noakes accepted to supervise the thesis along with Andrew. I am thankful for his many suggestions and support. I am very grateful to Professor Basil Hiley. During the first years of my research I attended his weekly seminar at Birkbeck College. He provided me with very important insights and material. He also helped me to gain access to the David Bohm papers kept at Birkbeck College. Many thanks to Sue Godsell, librarian at Birkbeck College Library, for all her assistance during my research at the Bohm’s archive. Many thanks to Dr. Garreth Burr and Arletta Ford whom read parts of the manuscript and made important suggestions. Many thanks to Barbara Fernandez for reviewing the main parts of the manuscript and suggesting better ways to use the English language. To all all the staff of the now closed Exeter Centre for the Study of Esotericism (EXECESO), and to the students who participated in the now closed MA in Western Esotericism at Exeter University a big thank you! It was a joy to be part of the discussions, seminars, knowledge, friendships, etc. I am very proud to be one of the first three graduates of the MA. Many other important people that helped with suggestions, discus- sions, etc. will forgive me for not mentioning them explicitly. In an effort like this one, there are always many participants who deserve credit. Alas!, it is never possible to include explicitly all the people who deserve a big thank you. Gustavo Orlando Fernandez Cambridge, England December 2015 4 5 A Note on Style and References The references and the general style of the thesis follows the recom- mendations of The Modern Humanities Research Association as described in MHRA Style Guide.1 NCUACS 66.4.97 stands for the David Bohm papers in the National Cata- loging Unit for the Archives of Contemporary Scientists 66.4.97, deposed in the library of Birkbeck College of the University of London.2 NCUACS 66.4.97 is organized in four broad sections: A, B, C, and D. Each section is subsequently organized in sequentially numbered folders. A reference of the form ’NCUACS 66.4.97 A.1’ refers to the contents of folder 1 in section A. JKO stands for L.Krishnamurti Online, an initiative of the Krishnamurti Foundations to make the teachings of J. Krishnamurti available and freely downloadable in text and audio formats.3 The site guarantees the authen- ticity of a large text collection of all of Krishnamurti’s works from 1933 to 1986. This repository includes a large collection of recorded dialogues between David Bohm and Jiddu Krishnamurti. Any dialogue can be identi- fied by the date in which it took place and the text file in which the transcrip- tion is captured. A reference of the form ‘JKO 750531 v1.2 Final.doc’ refers to the document containing the transcription of the conversation that took place on 31 May 1975, and recorded in the file ’750531 v1.2 Final.doc’. This file can be downloaded from the website. 1Glanville Priceand and Brian Richardson, eds., MHRA Style Guide: A Handbook for Authors, Editors, and Writers of Theses (London: Modern Humanities Research As- sociation, 2008), <http : / /www . mhra . org .uk / Publications/ Books / StyleGuide/> [accessed 1 September 2015]. 2<http://www.bath.ac.uk/ncuacs/intro.htm> [accessed 1 September 2015] 3<http://www.jkrishnamurti.org/> [accessed 1 September 2015] 6 7 Contents 1 Introduction 12 1.1 Research Motivations . 12 1.2 Plan of the Thesis . 17 1.3 Modern Western Esotericism . 20 1.3.1 Esotericism . 20 1.3.2 Esotericism and the Academia . 23 1.3.3 Yates’ Paradigm . 29 1.3.4 Faivre’s Characterization . 31 1.3.5 Definition Issues . 35 1.4 An Integrative-Sympathetic-Corporate-Critical Approach . 42 1.5 The History of Science and Esotericism . 45 2 Sources 51 2.1 Primary Sources . 51 2.1.1 Unpublished Sources . 51 2.1.2 Books . 53 2.1.3 Dialogues . 55 2.1.4 Interviews . 56 2.1.5 Letters . 59 2.2 Secondary Sources . 60 2.2.1 Biographical and Historical . 60 2.2.2 Scientific . 64 2.2.3 Academic . 65 3 David Joseph Bohm (1917-1992) 71 3.1 Pennsylvania, Berkeley and Princeton . 71 3.2 Plasma as a Model of Collective Organization . 73 3.3 The Causal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics . 77 3.4 Into Exile . 82 3.5 Movement and the Qualitative Infinite of Nature . 91 3.6 London . 94 8 3.7 The Last Ten Years . 103 4 The Causal Interpretation 110 4.1 The Need for Interpretation . 111 4.2 Bohm’s Orthodox Interpretation . 115 4.2.1 Key Aspects of the Quantum Formalism . 115 4.2.2 Causality . 120 4.2.3 Discontinuity . 124 4.2.4 Quantum Wholeness . 126 4.2.5 The Classical Limit . 130 4.2.6 Entanglement . 133 4.2.7 Thought . 136 4.3 The Causal Interpretation . 139 4.3.1 The Physical Foundations of the Causal Interpretation 139 4.3.2 Comparing the Orthodox with the Causal . 153 4.3.3 The Reception of the Causal Interpretation .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Not Even Wrong, Ten Years Later: a View from Mathematics on Prospects for Fundamental Physics Without Experiment
    Not Even Wrong, ten years later: a view from mathematics on prospects for fundamental physics without experiment Peter Woit Columbia University Rutgers Physics Colloquium, February 3, 2016 Peter Woit (Columbia University) Not Even Wrong, ten years later: a view from mathematicsFebruary on prospects 3, 2016 for fundamental 1 / 32 physics without experiment Outline Some advertisements and some provocations: Advertisements: an old book, an ongoing blog, and a forthcoming book. Review what has happened to the idea of string theory unification. Raise the issue of what happens absent new experimental guidance. Can the example of mathematics help? Evidence for deep connections between math and physics: quantum mechanics and representation theory Speculation about relevance of ideas from representation theory to better understanding the Standard Model. Peter Woit (Columbia University) Not Even Wrong, ten years later: a view from mathematicsFebruary on prospects 3, 2016 for fundamental 2 / 32 physics without experiment An advertisment for three projects Not Even Wrong: the book Written largely in 2001-2 2003: under review at Cambridge University Press Fall 2004: accepted for publication by British publisher (with help from Roger Penrose) Mid-2006: published around same time as Lee Smolin's The Trouble with Physics. The \String Wars" kick off. Peter Woit (Columbia University) Not Even Wrong, ten years later: a view from mathematicsFebruary on prospects 3, 2016 for fundamental 3 / 32 physics without experiment An advertisment for three projects Not Even Wrong: the blog Started March 2004 In 2006, one of the battlefields of the string wars. Currently 1512 postings 41,335 comments Around 20,000 page-views/day (mostly robots...) http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/blog Peter Woit (Columbia University) Not Even Wrong, ten years later: a view from mathematicsFebruary on prospects 3, 2016 for fundamental 4 / 32 physics without experiment An advertisment for three projects An advertisement for the competition Finally in 2015, a book with the counter-argument I was expecting.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:0908.1787V1 [Quant-Ph] 13 Aug 2009 Ematical Underpinning
    August 13, 2009 18:17 Contemporary Physics QuantumPicturalismFinal Contemporary Physics Vol. 00, No. 00, February 2009, 1{32 RESEARCH ARTICLE Quantum picturalism Bob Coecke∗ Oxford University Computing Laboratory, Wolfson Building, Parks Road, OX1 3QD Oxford, UK (Received 01 02 2009; final version received XX YY ZZZZ) Why did it take us 50 years since the birth of the quantum mechanical formalism to discover that unknown quantum states cannot be cloned? Yet, the proof of the `no-cloning theorem' is easy, and its consequences and potential for applications are immense. Similarly, why did it take us 60 years to discover the conceptually intriguing and easily derivable physical phenomenon of `quantum teleportation'? We claim that the quantum mechanical formalism doesn't support our intuition, nor does it elucidate the key concepts that govern the behaviour of the entities that are subject to the laws of quantum physics. The arrays of complex numbers are kin to the arrays of 0s and 1s of the early days of computer programming practice. Using a technical term from computer science, the quantum mechanical formalism is `low-level'. In this review we present steps towards a diagrammatic `high-level' alternative for the Hilbert space formalism, one which appeals to our intuition. The diagrammatic language as it currently stands allows for intuitive reasoning about interacting quantum systems, and trivialises many otherwise involved and tedious computations. It clearly exposes limitations such as the no-cloning theorem, and phenomena such as quantum teleportation. As a logic, it supports `automation': it enables a (classical) computer to reason about interacting quantum systems, prove theorems, and design protocols.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamical Relaxation to Quantum Equilibrium
    Dynamical relaxation to quantum equilibrium Or, an account of Mike's attempt to write an entirely new computer code that doesn't do quantum Monte Carlo for the first time in years. ESDG, 10th February 2010 Mike Towler TCM Group, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/∼mdt26 and www.vallico.net/tti/tti.html [email protected] { Typeset by FoilTEX { 1 What I talked about a month ago (`Exchange, antisymmetry and Pauli repulsion', ESDG Jan 13th 2010) I showed that (1) the assumption that fermions are point particles with a continuous objective existence, and (2) the equations of non-relativistic QM, allow us to deduce: • ..that a mathematically well-defined ‘fifth force', non-local in character, appears to act on the particles and causes their trajectories to differ from the classical ones. • ..that this force appears to have its origin in an objectively-existing `wave field’ mathematically represented by the usual QM wave function. • ..that indistinguishability arguments are invalid under these assumptions; rather antisymmetrization implies the introduction of forces between particles. • ..the nature of spin. • ..that the action of the force prevents two fermions from coming into close proximity when `their spins are the same', and that in general, this mechanism prevents fermions from occupying the same quantum state. This is a readily understandable causal explanation for the Exclusion principle and for its otherwise inexplicable consequences such as `degeneracy pressure' in a white dwarf star. Furthermore, if assume antisymmetry of wave field not fundamental but develops naturally over the course of time, then can see character of reason for fermionic wave functions having symmetry behaviour they do.
    [Show full text]
  • Archons (Commanders) [NOTICE: They Are NOT Anlien Parasites], and Then, in a Mirror Image of the Great Emanations of the Pleroma, Hundreds of Lesser Angels
    A R C H O N S HIDDEN RULERS THROUGH THE AGES A R C H O N S HIDDEN RULERS THROUGH THE AGES WATCH THIS IMPORTANT VIDEO UFOs, Aliens, and the Question of Contact MUST-SEE THE OCCULT REASON FOR PSYCHOPATHY Organic Portals: Aliens and Psychopaths KNOWLEDGE THROUGH GNOSIS Boris Mouravieff - GNOSIS IN THE BEGINNING ...1 The Gnostic core belief was a strong dualism: that the world of matter was deadening and inferior to a remote nonphysical home, to which an interior divine spark in most humans aspired to return after death. This led them to an absorption with the Jewish creation myths in Genesis, which they obsessively reinterpreted to formulate allegorical explanations of how humans ended up trapped in the world of matter. The basic Gnostic story, which varied in details from teacher to teacher, was this: In the beginning there was an unknowable, immaterial, and invisible God, sometimes called the Father of All and sometimes by other names. “He” was neither male nor female, and was composed of an implicitly finite amount of a living nonphysical substance. Surrounding this God was a great empty region called the Pleroma (the fullness). Beyond the Pleroma lay empty space. The God acted to fill the Pleroma through a series of emanations, a squeezing off of small portions of his/its nonphysical energetic divine material. In most accounts there are thirty emanations in fifteen complementary pairs, each getting slightly less of the divine material and therefore being slightly weaker. The emanations are called Aeons (eternities) and are mostly named personifications in Greek of abstract ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Infinite Potential Show Title: Generic Show Episode #101 Date: 3/17/20 Transcribed by Daily Transcription Tre
    INFINITE POTENTIAL SHOW TITLE: GENERIC SHOW EPISODE #101 DATE: 3/17/20 TRANSCRIBED BY DAILY TRANSCRIPTION_TRE 00:00:28 DAVID BOHM People talked about the world, and I said, "Where does it end?" and, uh, uh... MALE And what answer did they give? DAVID BOHM Well, they-I never, uh, I don't remember. It wasn't terribly convincing I suppose. [LAUGH] DR. DAVID C. It was, uh, a night, and we were SCHRUM walking under the stars, black sky, and he looked up to the stars, and he said, "Ordinarily, when we look to the sky and look to the stars, we think of stars as objects far out and vast spaces between them." He said, "There's another way we can look at it. We can look at the vacuum at the emptiness instead as a planum, as infinitely full rather than infinitely empty. And that the material objects themselves are like little bubbles, little vacancies in this vast sea." 00:01:25 DR. DAVID C. So David Bohm, in a sense, was SCHRUM using that view to have me look at the stars and to have a sense of the night sky all of a sudden in a different way, as one whole living organism and these little bits that we call matter as sort to just little holes in it. DR. DAVID C. He often mentioned just one other SCHRUM aspect of this, that this planum, in a cubic centimeter of the planum, there's more, uh, energy matter than in the entire visible Page 2 of 62 universe.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilot-Wave Theory, Bohmian Metaphysics, and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics Lecture 8 Bohmian Metaphysics: the Implicate Order and Other Arcana
    Pilot-wave theory, Bohmian metaphysics, and the foundations of quantum mechanics Lecture 8 Bohmian metaphysics: the implicate order and other arcana Mike Towler TCM Group, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/∼mdt26 and www.vallico.net/tti/tti.html [email protected] – Typeset by FoilTEX – 1 Acknowledgements The material in this lecture is largely derived from books and articles by David Bohm, Basil Hiley, Paavo Pylkk¨annen, F. David Peat, Marcello Guarini, Jack Sarfatti, Lee Nichol, Andrew Whitaker, and Constantine Pagonis. The text of an interview between Simeon Alev and Peat is extensively quoted. Other sources used and many other interesting papers are listed on the course web page: www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/∼mdt26/pilot waves.html MDT – Typeset by FoilTEX – 2 More philosophical preliminaries Positivism: Observed phenomena are all that require discussion or scientific analysis; consideration of other questions, such as what the underlying mechanism may be, or what ‘real entities’ produce the phenomena, is dismissed as meaningless. Truth begins in sense experience, but does not end there. Positivism fails to prove that there are not abstract ideas, laws, and principles, beyond particular observable facts and relationships and necessary principles, or that we cannot know them. Nor does it prove that material and corporeal things constitute the whole order of existing beings, and that our knowledge is limited to them. Positivism ignores all humanly significant and interesting problems, citing its refusal to engage in reflection; it gives to a particular methodology an absolutist status and can do this only because it has partly forgotten, partly repressed its knowledge of the roots of this methodology in human concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineers News Staff Who Maybe Never Knew What Kind of in That Area
    years Vol. 72, #8/AUGUST 2014 For The Good & Welfare By Russ Burns, business manager Anniversary Celebration a HUGE success As we continue celebrating Local allowing us to have a last weekend CONTENTS 3’s 75 years of member representation, together with Local 3.” Congratulations, pin recipients ............ 4 I hope you pay special attention to Our thoughts and prayers go out the coverage in this edition of our to his family. Thomas exemplifies Hawaii endorsements ....................... 6 Diamond Anniversary Event held perfectly what a union member is. Fringe .......................................... 7 on June 28 at Six Flags Discovery He was proud of his career operating ATPA ............................................ 7 Kingdom in Vallejo, Calif. More than cranes and barges, and he wanted his Public Employee News ...................... 8 5,500 Local 3 members, own family to experience their families and his union family. I am Credit Union ................................. 10 friends spent the day glad that he got his wish. Rancho Murieta .............................. 11 watching the exclusive Good things happen Looking at Labor ............................ 12 Local 3 shows that when we come together. Safety ......................................... 13 included tigers, dolphins This is what unionism is. and sea lions, riding the Several recent successes Unit 12 ........................................ 13 rollercoasters and water have resulted because of Organizing .................................... 14 rides and enjoying the our solidarity. President How does Local 3 celebrate 75 years? ... 15 all-you-could-eat lunch. Obama signed the Water 75 years strong .............................. 19 Everyone I talked Resources Reform and District Reports .............................. 20 to said the event was Development Act in a success, including Retiree Richard Thomas enjoys June, which equates to Meetings and Announcements ............
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertations Listed Alphabetically by Author A
    Dissertations Listed Alphabetically by Author Awasu, Wilson. 1.17 Bruno-loire, Rosa delCarmen. 2.17 Religion, Christianity and the Powers in Ewe 'The Educational Work of the American Methodist A Society. Episcopal Mission in Peru (1889-1930): Social Ph.D. 1988 FuTS. Gospel and American Economic and Ideological Adrian,Marlin Wayne. 1.1 Penetration. Mennonites, Missionaries and Native Americans: Ph.D.1983 UCalg. Religious Paradigms and Cultural Encounters. Ph.D.1989 UV. B Buama, Livingstone Komia. 2.18 The Relevance of Professor James Cone's Black Adu-Andoh, Samuel. 1.2 Theology for the Ghanaian Context. The Sacred in Ghana's Struggle for Justice and Barlow, PhilipLayton. 2.1 Ph.D.1985 DU. Communal Identity: The Legacy of Kwame The Bible in Mormonism. Nkrumah. Th.D. 1988 H. Buckalew, Ronald W. 2.19 Ph.D.1986 PTS. A Return of the Servant: Kenotic Christ and Barreno, ManuelMaria. 2.2 Religious Pluralism in the Thought of Raimundo Agtarap,AlfredoSan Pedro. 1.3 Conflicting Christologies Met at Puebla. Panikkar and Wilfred Cantwell Smith. A Christian Response to Philippine Liberation Ph.D. 1982 AlISL. Ph.D.1987 UTS/V. Movements. Ph.D.1991 FuTS. Batstone, DavidBruce. 2.3 Burdick, John Samuel. 2.20 From Conquest to Struggle: Jesus of Nazareth in Looking for God in Brazil: The Progressive Aigbe,SundayAgbons. 1.4 the Liberation Christology of Latin America. Catholic Church in Urban Brazil's Religious The Prophetic Role of a Church in a Developing Ph.D. 1989 GTU. Arena. Economy: The Case of the Assemblies of God in Ph.D.1990CUNY. Nigeria. Baumgartner, Erich Walter.
    [Show full text]
  • Particle Theory: a View from a Neighboring Field
    Particle theory: a view from a neighboring field Peter Woit Mathematics Department Columbia University Rochester Physics and Astronomy Colloquium March 7, 2018 Peter Woit (Mathematics Department ColumbiaParticle University) theory: a view from a neighboring field March 7, 2018 1 / 31 Two cultures Physics 1979: B.A./M.A. in physics, Harvard 1984: Ph.D. in particle theory, Princeton 1984-87: Postdoc ITP Stony Brook Mathematics 1988: adjunct Calculus instructor, Tufts math department 1988-9: Postdoc, Mathematical Sciences Research Institute, Berkeley 1989-93: Asst. professor, Columbia math department (non-tenure track) 1993-current: Permanent non-tenured position at Columbia, now Senior Lecturer Neighboring fields, but very different language and culture. Remniscent of moving between US and France as a child (lived in Paris age 8-13). Peter Woit (Mathematics Department ColumbiaParticle University) theory: a view from a neighboring field March 7, 2018 2 / 31 The SM: a victim of its own success The Standard Model, some history 1973: SU(3) x SU(2) X U(1) gauge theory of strong, weak and electromagnetic forces 1983: Discovery of W/Z bosons 1995: Discovery of the top quark 1998: Discovery of non-zero neutrino masses (an extension of the original SM) 2012: Discovery of the Higgs at the LHC Current situation All high energy accelerator experiments consistent with the SM. Ongoing experiments at the LHC at 13 TeV center of mass energy. Peter Woit (Mathematics Department ColumbiaParticle University) theory: a view from a neighboring field March 7, 2018
    [Show full text]
  • John Von Neumann's “Impossibility Proof” in a Historical Perspective’, Physis 32 (1995), Pp
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by SAS-SPACE Published: Louis Caruana, ‘John von Neumann's “Impossibility Proof” in a Historical Perspective’, Physis 32 (1995), pp. 109-124. JOHN VON NEUMANN'S ‘IMPOSSIBILITY PROOF’ IN A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ABSTRACT John von Neumann's proof that quantum mechanics is logically incompatible with hidden varibales has been the object of extensive study both by physicists and by historians. The latter have concentrated mainly on the way the proof was interpreted, accepted and rejected between 1932, when it was published, and 1966, when J.S. Bell published the first explicit identification of the mistake it involved. What is proposed in this paper is an investigation into the origins of the proof rather than the aftermath. In the first section, a brief overview of the his personal life and his proof is given to set the scene. There follows a discussion on the merits of using here the historical method employed elsewhere by Andrew Warwick. It will be argued that a study of the origins of von Neumann's proof shows how there is an interaction between the following factors: the broad issues within a specific culture, the learning process of the theoretical physicist concerned, and the conceptual techniques available. In our case, the ‘conceptual technology’ employed by von Neumann is identified as the method of axiomatisation. 1. INTRODUCTION A full biography of John von Neumann is not yet available. Moreover, it seems that there is a lack of extended historical work on the origin of his contributions to quantum mechanics.
    [Show full text]
  • RRLR Neighborhood News Spring 2015
    Neighborhood NEWS SPRING • 2015 RUXTON-RIDERWOOD-LAKE ROLAND AREA IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION Stairway to Heaven: A Rockland Garden INSIDE by Bliss McCord was on the 2006 Maryland House and Garden Pilgrim- age, has undergone a metamorphosis over the years. Foundation Do you remember the magical moment in “The Wizard Broadens of Oz” when the whirling house plops down in Oz and Mike, a middle school math teacher and the gardener in the family, has spent much of his spare time satis- Leadership With Dorothy opens her gray farmhouse door to an amaz- New Officers fying a passion for trees and gardening by imagining ing Technicolor world? Well, with perhaps a little PAGE 3 hyperbole, that was how I felt as I wound my way and transforming this outdoor space. About the only down the steep steps remaining ves- H to the hidden garden tige of the old E·N·Olivier of Mike Rudie and garden, he says, – The Fruits Jean Lewis last fall. is fiddlehead of a Culinary ferns. Adventure The Rudies have lived PAGE 5 on the northwest Access to the corner of Falls and historic Rock- H Old Court Roads in land houses is Home Sales via a rear road one of the original PAGE 7 Rockland homes for parallel to Falls 14 years. You may Road; residents H Trees – Programs not know them, but and visitors and Planting you surely know must park in an their house. Their area high above PAGE 8 front yard is chock- and behind the a-block with vivid homes. What H makes the Rudie Bare Hills flowers that wave to Business you from the corner.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of High-Energy Particle Physics: a View from a Neighboring field
    The state of high-energy particle physics: a view from a neighboring field Peter Woit Mathematics Department Columbia University US Naval Observatory Colloquium December 6, 2018 Peter Woit (Mathematics Department ColumbiaThe state University) of high-energy particle physics: a view from aDecember neighboring 6, field2018 1 / 27 Two cultures Physics 1979: B.A./M.A. in physics, Harvard 1984: Ph.D. in particle theory, Princeton 1984-87: Postdoc ITP Stony Brook Mathematics 1988: adjunct Calculus instructor, Tufts math department 1988-9: Postdoc, Mathematical Sciences Research Institute, Berkeley 1989-93: Asst. professor, Columbia math department (non-tenure track) 1993-current: Permanent non-tenured position at Columbia, now Senior Lecturer Neighboring fields, but very different language and culture. Remniscent of moving between US and France as a child (lived in Paris age 8-13). Peter Woit (Mathematics Department ColumbiaThe state University) of high-energy particle physics: a view from aDecember neighboring 6, field2018 2 / 27 The SM: a victim of its own success The Standard Model, some history 1973: SU(3) x SU(2) X U(1) gauge theory of strong, weak and electromagnetic forces 1983: Discovery of W/Z bosons 1995: Discovery of the top quark 1998: Discovery of non-zero neutrino masses (an extension of the original SM) 2012: Discovery of the Higgs at the LHC Current situation All high energy accelerator experiments consistent with the SM. Ongoing experiments at the LHC at 13 TeV center of mass energy. Peter Woit (Mathematics Department ColumbiaThe
    [Show full text]