Order Number 8913650
In vitro studies of self-splicing group II introns
Hebbar, Sharda Kattingeri, Ph.D.
The Ohio State University, 1989
Copyright ©1989 by Hebbar, Sharda Kattingeri. Allrightsreserved.
U-M-I
300N.ZecbRd. Ann Arbor, MI48106
IN VITRO STUDIES OF SELF-SPLICING GROUP II INTRONS
DISSERTATION
Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate
School of the Ohio State University
By
Sharda Kattingeri Hebbar, B.S., M.S.
* * * * *
The Ohio State University
1989
Dissertation Committee: P. A. Fuerst
Approved by
L. F. Johnson
—
A. M. Lambowitz P. S. Perlman
* Adviser
Department of Molecular Genetics
Copyright by
Sharda Kattingeri Hebbar
1989
To My Parents, and To My Husband, Raja.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank Dr. P.S. Perlman for his assistance and guidance. Special thanks go to Kevin Jarrell and Rosemary Dietrich not only for their technical advice but also for their friendship. To my husband, Raja, I would like to express my sincere gratitude for his encouragement, support and endurance throughout my endeavors.
iii
VITA
February 21, 1980
1960 ............. Born - Andhra Pradesh, India
................... B«S., Osnania University,
Hyderabad, India
1980 - 1982
1983 - 1986
................... M.S., Andhra University,
Waltair, Andhra Pradesh
.................... Graduate Teaching Associate,
MCDB Program, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
1986 - 1988
.................
.
Graduate Research Associate, Department of Molecular Genetics, The Ohio Sta+e University, Columbus, Ohio
FIELDS OF STUDY
Major Field: Molecular Genetics
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION .................................................
1
I.A. Catalytic RNA I.B. Yeast mitochondrialDNA
I.B.l. Mosaic genes
..........................
.
........
12235
6
...............................
I.B.2. Maturases I.B.3. Group I introns
I.B.3.a. Discovery of RNA catalysis I.B.3.b. Tetrahymena rRNA intron self-splices by a two step transesterification pathway
I.B.3.C. Tetrahymena rRNA intron is a group I intron
79
I.B.3.d. Mitochondrial group I introns self-splice in vitro
10
I.B.3.e. Not all group I introns are self- splicing
11
I.B.3.f. The intervening sequence RNA of
Tetrahymena is an Enzyme
I.B.3.g. Active site model
12 13
I.B.4. Group II intron splicing ...................... 14
I.B.4.a. Conserved sequence elements and secondary structure ........................... 14
I.B.4.b. Group II introns in yeast
mitochondria ................................... 16
I.B.4.C. Group II introns encode proteins related to reverse transcriptase..................................,,17
I.B.4.d. AI5g self-splices in vitro by a
novel..........................
18
I.B.4.e. Role of branch formation ................ 19 I.B.4.f. Group II intron splicing resembles nuclear pre-mRNA splicing .......... 20
I.B.4.g. Alternative reaction conditions
.......
22
I.B.4.h. Trans-splicing .......................... 23 I.B.4.i. Dependance on 5’ exon
sequences...............................
25
I.B.4.j. Multiple 5’exon binding sites .......... 26 I.B.4.k. Domain 4 is dispensible ................. 26 I.B.4.1. Domain 5 is required for 5’
exon release....................................27
I.C. Dissertation Goals.........
28
v
29
II.A. Plasmid constructions ............................... 29
MATERIALS AND METHODS
II.B. Plasmid preparation............... 30 II.C. Transcription and Purification of RNA..............30 II.D. All Splicing reactions............ II.E. Site-directed mutagenesis.......... II.F. Purification and end-labeling of
30 31
oligonucleotides ....................................... 31
II.G. RNA sequencing..................................,....32 II.H. Northern Blots....................................... 32
- II.I. 3* end-labeling of RNA.......................
- 32
II.J. Limit T1 digest...................................... 32 U.K. Other Methods........................................ 33 II.L. Enzyme reagents........
33
RESULTS...........................................
34
III.A. Test of the generality of group II self-
splicing ..............................
34
III.A.I. Cloning of intron 1 of the COX I gene
............................................. 35
III.B. Features of the all self-splicing
reaction ................................. 36
.......
*
III.B.1. All RNA is inactive in the standard aI5g splicing buffer............................... 36
III.B.2. All has an absolute requirement for monovalent cations.................
III.B.3. All RNA has a higher threshold for
»........37
magnesium than aI5g................................ 38
III.B.4. NH4C1 as the standard splicing
buffer..................................
III.B.5. All reactions have a temperature optimum of 4QoC............................
III.B.6 . The reaction is unimolecular and time dependent . .....
39 40 40
III.B.7. Optimum reaction conditions ................ 41
III.C. Characterization of the NH4C1 reaction products 42
III.C.l. Identification of products containing the 3*exon...........
III.C.2. First test of the validity of the
assignments...................
43 44
IiI.C.3. Accurate ligation of exons ................. 45 III.C.4. The slowly migrating RNA species is excised intron lariat (IVS-LAR) .................. 46
III.C.5. Accurate 5’ Cleavage ........................ 47 III.C.6 . Technical problems in mapping the
branch point ....................................... 48
III.C.7. Summary and implications of product characterization
.............................48
vi
III.D. All yields some novel reactionproducts in KC1
III.D.1. Further analysis of KC1 effects on
49 the all reaction
............................. 50
III.D.2. Characterization of novel KC1 products
..........................51
III.D.3 A proposed pathway for the KC1 reaction.......
54
55 55 57 58
III.E. Spliced exon reopening (SER)
III.E.l. All does not reopen spliced exons......... III.E.2. SER is sequence specific...................
III.F. Much of the intron ORF can bedeleted
III.F.l. Location of the branch site in the
- shortened IVS-LAR..........
- -
...........
60 62 62
I1I.G. Studies using portions of all
III.G.1. Trans-splicing
.................
III.G.2. The conserved 5*boundary sequence is needed for trans-splicing......
III.H. Summary
.
...........
.
64
66
III.I. Studies of aI5g self-splicing
111.1.1. Introduction...........
- -
- 67
67
111.1.2. Domain 5 is required, in cis, for
the second step of splicing........................68
111.1.3. Mutational analysis of the conserved 5* end of the intron
.......
71
111.1.3.a. The first 7 nt of the intron are essential for branch formation............ 71
111.1.3.b. 5’ end of the intron plays a role in SER.....................................75
111.1.4. Domain 6 is not required for splicing in vitro..........
76
- 77
- III.J. Molecular dissection of domain 5
III.J.l. Introduction................................. 77 III.J.2. Heterologous experiments...... III.J.3. Mutations of the highly conserved unpaired regions of domain 5
77
...... 78
III.J.3.a. The 4 base pair loop................. 78 III.J.3.b. RNA truncated at the Rsa I site in domain 5 is inactive.................. 80
III.J.3.0. The CG bulge...........................81
III.J.4. Bottom helix ................................. 83 III.J.5. 7 nt in the 5* half of domain 5 can form a perfect match with 7nt in domain 1
.................................................... 85
DISCUSSION
88
IV.A. All self-splices in vitro
88
IV.A.l. All self-splices under conditions different from those of aI5g and bll .............90
IV.A.2. All reaction pathways ........................ 91 IV.A.3. All undergoes a post-splicing
vii
reaction in KC1.....
........................
IV.A.4. All does not carry out apliced exon reopening
.
........
.
.......................
.
IV.A.5. Much of the intron open reading
frame can be deleted.......................
IV.B. 5* end of the intron is not required for 5' exon release but plays a role in branch formation
IV.C.. 5* end of the intron plays a role in SER IV.D. Lariat formation is not required for efficient splicing in vitro
.. 93
94 96
96 97
IV.E. Domain 5 is also required for the second step in splicing
IV.E.l. 4 base GAAA loop is not critical for
domain 5 function ...........................
IV.E.2. The 2 base bulge is crucial for domain 5 function
.
...........................
100
IV.F. Future experiments
IV.F.l. Point of interaction..................... IV.F.2. Transformation experiments