DOCSLIB.ORG

Recovering America's Wildlife

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Recovering America's Wildlife Business and Conservation Interests Support Dedicated Funding to Recover America’s Fish and Wildlife We, the undersigned, support preventing fish, wildlife , and plants from becoming endangered by cre- ating a dedicated federal fund for proactive conservation efforts, led by the states, territories, and tribal nations, to address the nation’s looming wildlife crisis. We support this concept as initially rec- ommended by the Blue Ribbon Panel on Sustaining America’s Diverse Fish and Wildlife Resources, comprised of national business and conservation leaders. Our nation has been blessed with a diverse array of flora and fauna. While some of these species are thriving, many more are facing increasing challenges and are in steep decline – increasing their pos- sibility of becoming endangered. State fish and wildlife agencies have identified 12,000 species na- tionwide in need of proactive conservation action. At the request of Congress, every state has developed a State Wildlife Action Plan to assess the health of their state’s fish and wildlife and outline conservation actions necessary to sustain them. Collec- tively, these action plans have identified these 12,000 species and formed a nationwide strategy to prevent them from becoming endangered. However, the current federal State and Tribal Wildlife Grants program is funded at only a fraction of what states need to conserve these species. State fish and wildlife biologists estimate that it would cost $1.3 billion annually to implement 75 percent of these actions. In addition, our nation’s tribes need similar funds ($97.5 million/annually) to address the hundreds of species and millions of acres of lands they steward. The magnitude of the solution must match the magnitude of the challenge. America has a proud history of bringing fish and wildlife back from the brink of extinction through professional wildlife management. A century ago, prized game species like elk, wood ducks, prong- horns, and striped bass were at risk of extinction—now they are thriving due largely to user fees provided by hunters and anglers. Today we face a new conservation crisis as emerging diseases, in- vasive species, habitat loss, and extreme weather threaten many wildlife and plant populations at a scale inconceivable just a few decades ago. This growing wildlife crisis poses a threat to America’s vibrant outdoor economy. Hunters, anglers, birders, hikers, campers, gardeners, and backyard wildlife watchers have created a fast growing out- door consumer base that depends on healthy wildlife populations. Today, the outdoor economy con- tributes $887 billion to our national economy annually, creates 7.6 million direct jobs, and generates $124.5 billion in federal, state, and local tax revenue. Further, by preventing the decline of species so that they do not require the stricter protections of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), other businesses will be able to operate with more regulatory certainty and reduced risk. As the decline of numerous species and their habitats across the country worsens, preemptive action can reverse this trend and keep species from the critical, yet often costly, “emergency room” measures required by the ESA. Proactive conservation is good for wildlife, good for taxpayers, and good for business. We support the protection of our nation’s precious natural her- itage by supporting efforts to direct dedicated funding into the Wildlife Conservation and Restoration Program as well as a Tribal program Sincerely, Sign the letter by clicking here! www.nwf.org • 1 National and Regional Maryland-Delaware Chapter of The Wildlife So- Allegheny Highlands Alliance ciety American Bird Conservancy Mule Deer Foundation American Birding Association National Audubon Society American Fisheries Society National Bobwhite Conservation Initiative American Fly Fishing Trade Association National Wildlife Federation American Littoral Society National Wild Turkey Federation American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpe- Native American Fish and Wildlife Society tologists Nature Abounds American Ornithological Society Natural Areas Association Artemis Sportswomen NatureServe Association of Field Ornithologists North American Bluebird Society, Purple Mar- Association of National Estuary Programs tin Conservation Association Association of Zoos & Aquariums Northeastern Division of the American Fisher- Backcountry Hunters and Anglers ies Society Bass Pro Shops Northeast Section of The Wildlife Society Bat Conservation International Northwest Section of The Wildlife Society BookKeeping Express Pheasants Forever Born Free USA Ramseur Records Cardno Ruffed Grouse Society Central Mountains & Plains Section of The Southern Environmental Law Center Wildlife Society Southeast Section of The Wildlife Society Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation Southeastern Fishes Council Cornell Lab of Ornithology Southeastern Grasslands Initiative Delta Waterfowl Foundation The Avett Brothers Desert Fish and Habitat Partnership The Raptor Trust DJ Case & Associates The Conservation Fund E2, Environmental Entrepreneurs The Longleaf Alliance Environment America The Nature Conservancy Environmental Defense Fund The Wildlife Society Greater Yellowstone Coalition Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership HECHO Trout Unlimited Izaak Walton League of America Quail and Upland Wildlife Federation Quality Deer Management *National organization www.nwf.org • 2 Western Landowners Alliance National Aquarium Western Section of The Wildlife Society Nebraska Wildlife Federation Wildlands Network Nevada Wildlife Federation Wildlife Forever New Hampshire Audubon Wildlife Habitat Council New Jersey Audubon Wildlife Management Institute New Mexico Wildlife Federation World Wildlife Fund North Carolina Wildlife Federation Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative North Dakota Wildlife Federation Ohio Conservation Federation National Wildlife Federation Affiliates PennFuture Alabama Wildlife Federation Planning and Conservation League (CA) Arizona Wildlife Federation Prairie Rivers Network Arkansas Wildlife Federation Sociedad Ornitológica Puertorriqueña Inc. Association of Northwest Steelheaders South Carolina Wildlife Federation Colorado Wildlife Federation South Dakota Wildlife Federation Connecticut Forest & Park Association Southeast Alaska Conservation Council Conservation Coalition of Oklahoma Tennessee Wildlife Federation Conservation Council for Hawai’i Texas Conservation Alliance Conservation Federation of Missouri Vermont Natural Resources Council Conservation Northwest Virgin Islands Conservation Society Delaware Nature Society West Virginia Rivers Coalition Earth Conservation Corps Wyoming Wildlife Federation Environmental Council of Rhode Island Wisconsin Wildlife Federation Florida Wildlife Federation Georgia Wildlife Federation Alabama Idaho Wildlife Federation Alabama B.A.S.S. Nation Indiana Wildlife Federation Alabama Wildlife Federation Iowa Wildlife Federation AU Davis Arboretum Kansas Wildlife Federation Auburn University Kentucky Waterways Alliance National Speleological Society Louisiana Wildlife Federation Pelican Coast Conservancy Michigan United Conservation Clubs Pritchett Environmental & Property Law LLC Minnesota Conservation Federation The Longleaf Alliance* Mississippi Wildlife Federation Montana Wildlife Federation *National organization www.nwf.org • 3 Alaska Desert Rivers Audubon Society American Fisheries Society, International Asso- Navajo Nation Dept. of Fish and Wildlife ciation of Great Lakes Research Northern Arizona Audubon Society Alaska Nature Guides Northern Arizona University Alaska Survival O.S.H.O Brewing Alaska Wild Harvest, LLC Prescott Audubon Society American Fisheries Society, Alaska Chapter Prison Hill Brewing Company Audubon Alaska Sahara Painting, Inc City of Whittier Alaska Sonoran Audubon Society Chapter Paper Gold Publishing Sprague’s Sports LLC Southeast Alaska Conservation Council Strategic Planning Consultants, LLC Susitna River Coalition Town & Country General Contractors Talkeetna Spinach Bread Trout Unlimited Zane Grey Chapter The Wildlife Society, Alaska Chapter Tucson Audubon Society University of Alaska, Anchorage Ware Farms, LLC University of Alaska, Fairbanks Wren House Brewing Company West Hair Studio Yuma Rod & Gun Club Arizona *Arkansas The following organizations were also included American Fisheries Society, Arizona Chapter in a state-specific letter. American Fisheries Society, Arizona-New Mex- American Fisheries Society, Arkansas Chapter ico Chapter AR Sierra Club Arizona Antelope Foundation Arkansas Interfaith Power & Light Arizona Backcountry Hunters & Anglers Arkansas Master Naturalists Arizona Council of Trout Unlimited Arkansas Natural Sky Association Arizona Elk Society Arkansas Public Policy Panel Arizona Mule Deer Organization Arkansas State Chapter National Wild Turkey Arizona Wilderness Brewing Company Federation Arizona Wildlife Federation Arkansas State University Audubon Arizona Arkansas Wildlife Federation Borderlands Brewing Company Audubon Arkansas Bulton Brew House Beaver Watershed Alliance Catalina Brewing Company Best Pallets, Inc. Coconino Sportsmen Black OPS Calls Desert Fish Habitat Partnership* Branded Branos *National organization www.nwf.org • 4 Building Plastics Inc. California Chapter of Backcountry Hunters & Byrd’s Adventure Center Anglers Charles S. Buckner Real Estate Appraisals California Department of Water Resources Cornerstone Club, LLC California Invasive Plant Council Creative Ideas California Oaks Entegrity California Waterfowl Association
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Guide for Landowners
    WETLAND HABITAT MANAGEMENT: -A Guide for Landowners- Updated Mar 3, 2005 DUCKS UNLIMITED GREAT LAKES/ATLANTIC REGIONAL OFFICE DUCKS UNLIMITED | Great Lakes/Atlantic Regional Office | 1220 Eisenhower Place | Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108 | ph: 734.623.2000 | www.ducks.org . WETLAND HABITAT MANAGEMENT: -A Guide for Landowners- TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Introduction 1 How can Ducks Unlimited Help? 1 Mission Statement 1 UNDERSTANDING WETLANDS Wetland History and Status 2 What is a Wetland? 2 Functions and Values 2 The Wet and Dry Cycle 3 What is Wetland Restoration 3 The Benefits of Wetland Restoration and Management 3 CRITERIA FOR SELECTING A SITE Objectives and Project Planning 4 Topography and Existing Hydrology 4 Soil Types 4 Water Sources and Water Quality 5 Adjacent Land Use 5 Accessibility 5 Regulations and Permits 5 Agencies Involved in Wetland Protection and Permitting 6 WETLAND DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION Site Survey 6 Type and Design of Restored Wetlands 6 Dikes and Levees 7 Tile Breaks 7 Ditch Plugs 7 Dike Seeding Mixture 7 Muskrats 7 Water Depths 8 Size and Shape 8 Water Control Structures 8 Types of Water Control Structures 8 Placement and Size 9 WILDLIFE HABITAT MANAGEMENT Shallow Water Marsh Management 9 Timing of Drawdown 9 Drawdown Rates 10 Frequency of Drawdowns 10 Flooding 10 Small Wetland Basins 10 Hemi-marsh Management 11 Green Tree Reservoirs 11 Agriculture and Waterfowl Migration 11 Maintenance 11 Monitoring 12 ASSOCIATED UPLAND HABITAT MANAGEMENT Planning a Prairie Grass Restoration 12 Types of Upland Cover 13 Planting
    [Show full text]
  • What Can Your Land Do for You?
    Karner Blue, USFWS pixelio.de WHAT CAN YOUR LAND DO FOR YOU? If you own land and care about wetlands and wildlife, you can help DU protect and restore wetlands and other types of habitat on your land! By letting DU know that you, or someone you know, own land and are interested in conservation, you are helping DU achieve its mission of protecting, restoring and managing wetlands for waterfowl, other wildlife and people. Unlike a state or federal wildlife agency, DU is not a land-holding organization. Ducks Unlimited believes the urgency of its conservation mission is best served by acquiring, permanently protecting and divesting itself of the protected land. If your answer is YES to any or all of these questions, then you should contact us today! Ducks Unlimited has a team of professionals on staff that can provide you with information Dusky Seaside Sparrow, USFWS Sparrow, Seaside Dusky DU works to restore, manage and protect property containing important waterfowl and wildlife habitat. and resources. Visit our Web site and participate in Ducks Unlimited’s By letting DU know that you own land and are interested in conservation efforts today! conservation, we may have land services that would help you. Visit our Web site and participate in DU’s conservation efforts today! http://www.ducks.org Within the Great Lakes/Atlantic region, residents of the states of Delaware, Maryland, New York and Virginia may also qualify for significant state income tax benefits for the donation of conservation lands or easements on their White-tailed deer fawn, USFWS fawn, deer White-tailed properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Waterfowl and Wetland Conservation: Counting Acres
    Measuring Waterfowl and Wetland Conservation: Counting Acres The Bottom Line: “Counting acres is a useful yardstick for measuring progress toward conservation goals. No matter how acres or progress are determined, Ducks Unlimited stands as the world’s leader among wetland and waterfowl conservation organizations.” How does DU measure progress toward its waterfowl conservation goals? • Ducks Unlimited has several measures of conservation performance, including acres conserved. We maintain a cumulative total of the acres conserved since DU started its work in 1937. • As of December 31, 2004, the total “acres conserved” in North America by DU was 11,259,529, with the national breakdown being: Canada – 6,288,036; U.S. – 3,231,947; Mexico – 1,739,546. What does “acres conserved” mean? • DU defines conserved acres as habitat that DU has protected, restored, enhanced or managed for the benefit of waterfowl. DU considers habitat conserved if it is under an agreement that lasts at least 10 years or is owned by a public agency that assures its long-term dedication to wildlife. • Protection can involve a range of activities, from complete protection through fee-title purchase to easements that protect waterfowl habitat values while allowing compatible or beneficial activities, such as managed and delayed grazing or hunting. • When DU restores or enhances land, we improve the habitat by taking direct management actions such as improving water control, plugging ditches or establishing native vegetation. Although DU often protects and restores or enhances the same land, we only count the acres once to avoid double counting. • Most DU work is done on land that is owned by someone else, although DU does own over 300,000 acres in North America, primarily in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • East Texas Wetlands Project
    EAST TEXAS WETLANDS PROJECT A Cooperative Program Supporting Waterfowl & Wetlands on Private Lands 11942 FM 848 Tyler, Texas 75707 Phone: (903) 570-9626 / Fax: (903) 566-3273 GUIDELINES FOR LANDOWNERS A. East Texas Wetlands Project (ETWP) Overview: The ETWP provides East Texas landowners the opportunity for: • Technical assistance &/or financial incentives; to • Restore, enhance, &/or create natural or man-made wetlands & associated upland habitats; in • Wetland habitats such as forested wetlands, riparian areas, emergent wetlands, moist soil areas, harvested croplands, or waterfowl food plots; to • Increase biodiversity for waterfowl, other migratory birds (including Neotropical birds, shorebirds and wading birds), and related wetland wildlife. Management practices available: • Hydrology restoration, reforestation, plant propagation, vegetation management, site preparation, fencing to control grazing, wood duck nest boxes, and conservation easements. Landowners, approved by the ETWP Committee, will enter into a Wetland Development Agreement (WDA) to assure project objectives are fulfilled for a minimum of 10 years. B. General Guidelines: 1. Projects shall provide for protection, restoration, enhancement, and/or creation of wetlands along with appropriate adjoining habitat/buffer zones. 2. Projects shall involve a minimum of five (5) acres of surface water or 10 acres of bottomland hardwood reforestation. 3. Shallow surface water during an average year should be present from at least November 1 to March 1. A site-specific management plan will be developed and adhered to for each individual project site as some sites may require surface water for longer or shorter time. 4. To help ensure that waterfowl and other migratory birds receive the maximum benefits from projects funded by the ETWP, disturbance in and around project sites should be kept to a minimum during the winter season.
    [Show full text]
  • An International Program for Conservation of Migratory Birds and Their Habitats to Benefit People1
    People, Wings, and Forests: An International Program for Conservation of Migratory Birds and their Habitats to Benefit People1 Jack C. Capp2 ________________________________________ Introduction One in eight bird species in the world have a real risk Because some of these habitats are in countries that of becoming extinct in the next 100 years (Birdlife In- lack the resources or information to adequately protect ternational 2000). About three-fourths of these species and sustain the forests, wetlands, coastlines, grasslands occur in forests and over half of these species suffer and other much-needed habitats. Other factors in these from severe fragmentation of their habitats. Tropical countries include pesticide use, invasive species, and deforestation is the major reason for bird decline in the over harvest of timber. The human population in Latin world (Youth 2003). Almost half the forests that once America and the Caribbean is expected to increase covered the Earth are gone, and deforestation is ex- between 50 percent and 100 percent in the next 50 panding and accelerating (Abramovitz 1998). years. Worldwide, habitat loss and degradation are the major causes of endangerment of birds. Most important More than one-third of the bird species in the United is the loss and fragmentation of forests, especially States migrate to Latin America and the Caribbean tropical forests. Over 75 percent of threatened bird each year (North American Bird Conservation Initia- species worldwide occur in forests (Birdlife Inter- tive 2003). For many, they spend more time south of national 2000). the US than inside U.S. boundaries. Therefore, what happens outside the US will often determine if these Our Starting Point species will survive.
    [Show full text]
  • Centralia Students Donate Hair to Create Wig for Girl with Leukemia
    Serving our communities since 1889 — www.chronline.com $1 Napavine Early Week Edition Falls in Tuesday, Sept. 12, 2017 Thriller / Sports 1 Pickpocketing in Morton ARTrails Set for SWW Spokane Man Jailed for Warrants and Lifting Dozens of Local Artists Prepare to Show Wallet Off of Elderly Morton Man / Main 6 Their Work in Annual Showcase / Life 1 WDFW Centralia Students Donate Hair to Timeline of Accused Create Wig for Girl With Leukemia Illegal Hunting DOCUMENTS: Tracing the Actions of Accused Poachers Across Southwest Washington and Oregon By Jordan Nailon [email protected] Editor’s Note: The following timeline is the latest in a series of articles detailing a massive poaching operation uncovered in Southwest Washington and Northwest Oregon. It comes af- ter a records request that yielded hundreds of pages of evidence collected by the Washington De- partment of Fish and Wildlife. See previous coverage at www. chronline.com Date: Aug. 29, 2015 Location: Gifford Pinchot National Forest south of Randle Suspects: Bryan Tretiak, Erik Martin, William Haynes, Jared Wenzelburger / [email protected] Joe Dills, and Eddy Dills Lily Hubbard, left, smiles as her friend, Ellen Buzzard, right, has her first lock of hair cut Saturday afternoon in downtown Centralia. The hair is being donated for the Bears hunted with the use of creation of Lily’s new wig. dogs. Video evidence appears to show Tretiak shooting a GIVING TO A FRIEND: Ellen black bear out of a tree. “That’s your typical National Forest Buzzard and Kaylee bear,” Joe Dills says on video. Rooklidge Cut Their Hair The bear was taken home by Tretiak.
    [Show full text]
  • Ducks, Habitat Conservation, and Predators
    BLUE-WINGED TEAL BROOD: ©DUCKS UNLIMITED ©BILLMARCHEL.COM REPRINTED FROM THE NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2003 THE NOVEMBER/DECEMBER REPRINTED FROM HABIT AND PRED DUCKS UNLIMITED A T DUCKS, CONSER A MAGAZINE MAGAZINE T ORS V A TION, D R O F . R N H O J © : N E H D A E H D E R DUCKS, HABITAT CONSERVATION, AND PREDATORS A closer look at large-scale predator-control programs reveals that they are counterproductive to the long-term benefits of waterfowl and waterfowl hunters BY CHUCK PETRIE People often ask why Ducks Unlimited does However, working on small pieces can be not endorse predator control as a means of expected to yield small results in the big increasing duck production. After all, predator picture. DU and other wildlife management control is effective, isn’t it? Haven’t studies leaders have learned from those experiences proved that controlling predators such as and re-evaluated what they must do to most foxes, raccoons, and skunks can significantly effectively assure the long-term health of increase waterfowl nest success? If DU is waterfowl populations across North America concerned about the future of waterfowl and (see sidebar: Mississippi Flyway Council waterfowling, why doesn’t it advocate and Statement and Others’ Positions on Predator practice predator control on a large scale Removal). As a result, we have remained across the ducks’ primary breeding grounds? focused on DU’s original “Singleness of The truth is that Ducks Unlimited is not Purpose”—that of securing and restoring the always against predator control. DU’s habitat base upon which waterfowl depend.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterfowl & Wetlands Conservation
    CFR | FWRC KENNEDY ENDOWED PROGRAM WATERFOWL & WETLANDS CONSERVATION 2017–2018 ANNUAL REPORT 2018 ANNUAL REPORT 1 2017-2018 Kennedy Endowed Program in WATERFOWL AND WETLANDS CONSERVATION Annual Report Table of Winter 2017–2018 was stamped with Contents periodic, punishing blows of snow and bitter cold, but these in turn moved water- fowl to Mississippi and other southern clines. I hope FROM THE DIRECTOR ............................................. 4. you found some hotspots amidst the birds either in open water prior to or simultaneous with freeze-up, FEATURE ............................................................... 6. on ice itself, or in the slush and some open water. As fellow colleagues/hunters and I reminisced late- STUDENT ABSTRACTS ............................................ 10. ly, there were likely generations of mallards and other waterfowl that had never ventured this far NEW MEMBERS OF TEAM DUCK .............................. 16. south. It was not uncommon this winter to watch a small bunch of ducks swell ever-so-quickly into UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT EXPERIENCES............ 18. a swarm over grain fields, pressed to access vital carbohydrates during bouts of severe cold or snow. FIELD TRIPS .......................................................... 20. It was a rare winter that senior colleagues in Mis- sissippi had not witnessed since the late 1980s. SERVICE ................................................................ 24. This year was also marked by some unique professional experiences. I traveled to the campus GUESTS
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America
    Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America There are approximately 101,135sexual abuse claims filed. Of those claims, the Tort Claimants’ Committee estimates that there are approximately 83,807 unique claims if the amended and superseded and multiple claims filed on account of the same survivor are removed. The summary of sexual abuse claims below uses the set of 83,807 of claim for purposes of claims summary below.1 The Tort Claimants’ Committee has broken down the sexual abuse claims in various categories for the purpose of disclosing where and when the sexual abuse claims arose and the identity of certain of the parties that are implicated in the alleged sexual abuse. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a chart that shows the sexual abuse claims broken down by the year in which they first arose. Please note that there approximately 10,500 claims did not provide a date for when the sexual abuse occurred. As a result, those claims have not been assigned a year in which the abuse first arose. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the state or jurisdiction in which they arose. Please note there are approximately 7,186 claims that did not provide a location of abuse. Those claims are reflected by YY or ZZ in the codes used to identify the applicable state or jurisdiction. Those claims have not been assigned a state or other jurisdiction. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the Local Council implicated in the sexual abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Comedy, 109-12, 1200 Ft
    FALL 1985 VOL. 390 © 1985 Blackhawk Films, One Old Eagle Brewery, Davenport, Iowa 52802 Prices subiect to change BLACKHAWK'S NEWSREEL • As we heod into the foll seoson with its glorious doys of color, football games, crisp oir and great get togethers, we want to remind you that our mail order plont will be closed the day after Thanksgiving, but we' ll be here again on the very next Monday to handle your Christmas wants and needs. We are making this reminder early so you will know about it, AND to RE ­ MIND YOU to begin to get your Christmas Orders in Early so that we can have time to get all of them to you. Any orders TOTALING $50 or more, re­ ceived here in Davenport BY NOVEMBER 10, 1985 will qualify for our Early Order Christmas Discount of $5.00 off the order! Beginning with this catalog we are very happy to begin adding the complete line of motion pictures from Republic Pictures Corpora­ tion. As the months go by we will be odding more titles from their great lib rary of film titles. Republic is one of the oldest studios in the movie business ond the one at which many of the Gene Autry films were produced. You'll love the many great offerings we can now make available to you. As a Special Introductory Offer to this new and exciting catalog you may order ANY Blackhawk or Repulbic movie at the regular price shown and DEDUCT 20% on those titles. This introductory offer will end December 31 , 1985.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpretation of the Seattle Uplift, Washington, As a Passive-Roof Duplex by Thomas M
    Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 94, No. 4, pp. 1379–1401, August 2004 Interpretation of the Seattle Uplift, Washington, as a Passive-Roof Duplex by Thomas M. Brocher, Richard J. Blakely, and Ray E. Wells Abstract We interpret seismic lines and a wide variety of other geological and geophysical data to suggest that the Seattle uplift is a passive-roof duplex. A passive- roof duplex is bounded top and bottom by thrust faults with opposite senses of vergence that form a triangle zone at the leading edge of the advancing thrust sheet. In passive-roof duplexes the roof thrust slips only when the floor thrust ruptures. The Seattle fault is a south-dipping reverse fault forming the leading edge of the Seattle uplift, a 40-km-wide fold-and-thrust belt. The recently discovered, north-dipping Tacoma reverse fault is interpreted as a back thrust on the trailing edge of the belt, making the belt doubly vergent. Floor thrusts in the Seattle and Tacoma fault zones, imaged as discontinuous reflections, are interpreted as blind faults that flatten updip into bedding plane thrusts. Shallow monoclines in both the Seattle and Tacoma basins are interpreted to overlie the leading edges of thrust-bounded wedge tips advancing into the basins. Across the Seattle uplift, seismic lines image several shallow, short- wavelength folds exhibiting Quaternary or late Quaternary growth. From reflector truncation, several north-dipping thrust faults (splay thrusts) are inferred to core these shallow folds and to splay upward from a shallow roof thrust. Some of these shallow splay thrusts ruptured to the surface in the late Holocene.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 49, Number 2 Fall 2015
    Journal of Northwest Anthropology Volume 49, Number 2 Fall 2015 Richland, WA JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST ANTHROPOLOGY FORMERLY NORTHWEST ANTHROPOLOGICAL RESEARCH NOTES EDITORS Darby C. Stapp Deward E. Walker, Jr. Richland, WA University of Colorado ASSOCIATE EDITORS C. Melvin Aikens (University of Oregon), Haruo Aoki (University of California), Virginia Beavert (Yakama Nation), Don E. Dumond (University of Oregon), Don D. Fowler (University of Nevada), Raymond D. Fogelson (University of Chicago), Rodney Frey (University of Idaho), Ronald Halfmoon (Lapwai), Tom F.S. McFeat (University of Toronto), and Jay Miller (Lushootseed Research) Julia G. Longenecker Operations Manager Kara N. Powers Editorial Assistant Heather Hansen Production Assistant Composed by Northwest Anthropology LLC, Richland, WA; Printed by CreateSpace. Missing issue claim limit 18 months. For back issues and catalogue of prices contact Coyote Press, P O Box 3377, Salinas, CA 93912. <http://www.californiaprehistory.com> POLICY Journal of Northwest Anthropology, published semiannually by Northwest Anthropology LLC, in Richland, Washington, is a refereed journal and welcomes contributions of professional quality dealing with anthropological research in northwestern North America. Regular issues are published semiannually. Theoretical and interpretive studies and bibliographic works are preferred, although highly descriptive studies will be considered if they are theoretically significant. The primary criterion guiding selection of papers will be how much new research they can be expected to stimulate or facilitate. SUBSCRIPTIONS The subscription price is $45.00 U.S. per annum for individuals and small firms, $60.00 for institutional subscriptions, $30.00 for students with proof of student status, and $25.00 for all electronic subscriptions; payable in advance. Remittance should be made payable to Northwest Anthropology LLC.
    [Show full text]