A Re-Examination of the Warren Commission Findings

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Re-Examination of the Warren Commission Findings A RE-EXAMINATION OF THE WARREN COMMISSION FINDINGS: A MINORITY REPORT Participants: JACOB COHEN, historian, author of the article "The Missing Documents" PENN JONES, editor, the Midlothian Mirror, and author of "Forgive My Grief" MARK LANE, attorney, and author of "Rush to Judgment'! LEO SAUVAGE, correspondent for Le Figaro, and author of "The Oswald Affair" HAROLD WEISBERG, author of "Whitewash: The Report on the Warren Report" Moderator: JIM BISHOP, syndicated columnist, and author of the forthcoming book "The Day Kennedy Was Shot" Credits: Produced by Mel Baily Directed by Arthur Forrest Associate to the Producer: Paul Noble Recorded August 30, 1966 Telecast November 12, 1966, 9:00 P.M., h'NEW-TV, New York A Public Affairs Production of WNEW-TV, Metropolitan Broadcasting Televison, A Division of Metromedia, Inc. (c) Metromedia, Inc., 1966 SCHOENBRUN: I'm David Schoenbrun. History sometimes does repeat itself. A century ago a great American president was assassinated. There was no mystery about the assassin. John Wilkes Booth stood upon the stage and fired at Abraham Lincoln in the full, horrified view of hundreds of spectators. Yet, controversy over the assassination, whether it was or was not a plot rather than the act of a single madman, broke out at once and has never ceased right up to our day. Some three years ago another great American President was shot down. This time the assassin was not caught in the act, but Lee Oswald was arrested quickly and charged with the murder. Inevitably, as in the case of Lincoln, suspicion swiftly grew that there was a plot. A Presidential Commission was established to investigate all the facts, a distinguished Commission of eminent citizens and authorities, headed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, to dispel any further doubts that the truth would be found. And yet, as in the case of John Wilkes Booth controversy still rages over whether or not Lee Oswald was lone madman. Several books have appeared and several of the country's leading periodicals have seriously questioned the findings of the Warren Commission report -- and even its conclusions. Consistent with our self-imposed obligation to inform the public, we believe that the controversy over the Warren Report should be aired for the many thousands of citizens who have not studied the Commission's report or the charges of those critics who dissent from its conclusions. Members of the Commission and staff were invited to take part in the discussions you are about to see. They did not accept that first invitation. When producti of this program was completed and plans made to televise it, the Commission was informed and proffered a second invitation to participate in a follow-up program. We have now received several acceptances, and there will be a subsequent program presenting the opinions of those who support the findings of the Warren Report. But first this discussion by its critics, moderated by Jim Bishop. Ladies and gentlemen, Mr. Bishop. BISHOP: This ladies and gentlemen is an array of authors. As you know, an author is a person with a knowledge of words who enjoys inflicting his opinions on others. One of the blessings of the writer is that he is a trained professional observer. This particular group has something in common. Each has read and digested the ten million four hundred thousand words of the Warren Commission Report. This is the one which inquired into the assassination of President John F. Kennedy at Dallas on November 22, 1963. The Report found that a young malcontent, Lee Harvey Oswald, alone and with no conspirators, shot and killed the President. The authois have allegated to themselves the right to inquire into the accuracy of the Warren Commission Report. You might expect that a group of scribblers presented with the same assortment of facts would arrive at the same conclusion. This is not so. All of the men around me have written tracts disagreeing in part with the Warren Commission Report. Some see it as a skein of contradictions and lies. Others point at testimony which is not included in the report. Some believe that Lee Harvey Oswald did not shoot the President. I'm the only writer present who has not published his findings. It will be completed in two years and will be called "The Day Kennedy Was Shot". I am also the only writer here who agrees with the Warren Commission Report as it stands. I think that Oswald shot the President as casually as a boy in an empty lot might pick off a tin can. This makes me a minority of one. (Johnson quote over credits) 2. BISHOP: I would like to introduce the members of the panel who sit here with me this evening. On my extreme left is Mr. Penn Jones, Editor of the Midlothian Mirror in Texas, and the author of "FORGIVE MY GRIEF". Harold Weisberg, author of "WHITEWASH". Mark Lane, attorney and author of "RUSH TO JUDGMENT". Jacob Cohen, author of "THE'MISSING DOCUMENTS", and he is now writing a book defending the Warren Commission Report.. Now I think we should open with a little free and easy conversation. Penn Jones, give us your feelings. PENN JONES: Jim, I have been guilty of saying that the only way you can believe the Warren Report is to not read it, and that's really what America did. I'm happy to be on this panel, where now we have two who are willing to defend the report. I think it's awfully important that we as newsmen and the news media of this nation impress upon the American public the importance to read, not only the report,but the test- imony regardless of how much time it takes. BISHOP: And it certainly takes a lot of time, I can tell you. Mr. Sauvage. SAUVAGE: I have summed up in the last chapter of my book the eight quotes given by the Commission and I'm glad, glad that they are discussed now here for the first time in public in television. So each point will come up and will be discussed by us, but what I would like to add is that in this century and in this country, nobody should have the right to ask us to take anything on faith. We are entitled to discuss, and we are entitled to ask for proof. That, I believe is the main point. 3. BISHOP: That's a good one too. Mr. Weisberg? WEISBERG: My book WHITEWASH, the report on the Warren Report is restricted entirely to the Commission's official information and its report to which it is extensively referenced so you can keep me honest. It's the conclusion that the expected job has not been done and must be entirely in public, and preferably by Congress. In order to reach this conclusion I had to, in effect, destroy all the major conclusions of the report. This I did, I believe, entirely with the Commission's own evidence by showing how the Commission ignored witnesses and evidences, manufactured evidence, destroyed evidence, I mean lit erally destroyed. BISHOP: These are very grave charges. Hr. Lane. LANE: This is the Warren Commission Report when it was handed to President Johnson in September of 1964. He held it on nationwide television and said, "It's very heavy", which indeed may go down in hisotry as the finest short analysis of the report. For when the 26 volumes on which this report was allegedly based were released, it became clear that not a single basic conclusion of the Warren Commission could be substantiated by their actual findings. The Commission's conclusion that Oswald was the assassin is not compelling and cannot be reached upon what the Commission discovered. Its conclusion that one man alone killed President Kennedy is ludicrous and is rebutted by the known facts. Of course, there is more evidence. There is evidence in the National Archives which is classified and by order of Lyndon Johnson may not be seen until September of the year 2,039. I 4. think this is the imposition of consensus from above,the very antithesis of democracy. I think that if there is anything that we can all agree this evening, any one single fact is that the Archives should be opened up and that the material should be made available to the American people. BISHOP: Mr. Cohen. COHEN: Well, I'mgoing/Vant to make a comment about, just about everything Mr. Lane has said in the course of the evening, but I do want to make clear, that by and large I am a defender of the Commission, and what I defend, rather what I am convinced by, is that there is one and only one assassin. His name is Lee Harvey Oswald, and I might add that there was only one Lee Harvey Oswald. I do not defend the Commission against the charge that in some of its joints, it is rusty, and that some of the report is carelessly argued. In fact, I shall be pointing out that there are documents which the Commission never saw which are pivotal in its arguments and, if they were made public now, could effectively verify or silence some of the theories of some of my colleagues here. Also, let me say one other thing. I am the only defender of the Commission on this panel of five. The name of this program is "A Minority Report". The concept of the program is precisely that, it has mounted the minority report against the Warren report. Now, I don't want my ability to handle these five zealous gentlemen to be mistaken for whatever authority there is in the Warren report.
Recommended publications
  • A Legal-Scientific Analysis of the Warren Commission's Single Bullet
    The Magic Bullet: A Legal-Scientific analysis of the Warren Commission’s Single Bullet Theory Andrew M. Mason1 Since its publication in 1964, the Report of the President’s Commission on the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy 2 has been mired in controversy. In reaching its conclusion that President Kennedy was the victim of a lone assassin, the Warren Commission adopted the “single bullet theory” to explain the sequence of three shots directed at the President’s limousine. Three of the seven Commission members apparently disagreed with the theory on the grounds that the evidence did not support it. The lack of clear evidence for the theory and its inconsistency with key eyewitness testimony has provided fertile ground for conspiracy theorists who allege that the explanation was concocted to support the Commission’s conclusion that all shots were fired from Oswald’s rifle.3 According to the single bullet theory, a one-inch long, copper jacketed, lead core 6.5 millimeter rifle bullet fired from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository passed through President Kennedy’s neck, Governor Connally’s chest and wrist and embedded itself in the Governor’s thigh. In doing so, the bullet traversed 19 layers of clothing, 7 layers of skin, approximately 15 inches of tissue, struck a tie knot, removed 4 inches of rib and shattered a radius bone. Despite leaving several small particles of lead behind in the Governor’s wounds, the missile emerged from its tortuous journey remarkably unscathed. The bullet that is supposed to have done all this damage was found on Governor Connally’s stretcher in the corridor at the Parkland Hospital in Dallas.
    [Show full text]
  • NBC Offered 'Deal' to Ruin DA's Case, Russo Claims
    tant contact with the DA's 'PEW- SCHEME' ffice while Townley, Phelan nd Sheridan made repeated Z.. 40 VI isits to attempt to persuade him to appear on last night's NBC Offered 'Deal' to Ruin program. "Sheridan offered to set me up in California, protect my job and guarantee that Garri- DA's Case, Russo Claims son would never get me ex- tradited back to Louisiana," Star witness Perry R. Rus- the late David W. Ferric and Richard Townley of WDSU- he said. so said today -he "played Lee Harvey Oswald to kill TV at New Orleans and Sat- RUSSO SAID Sheridan along" with a National Broad- President John F. Kennedy. urday Evening Post writer made the promises if the wit- James Phelan. Today, Russo said he had ness would "side with NBC casting Co. team whose mem- never made that statement. bers told hirii they were out and the defense." He identified the three per- HE SAID TOWNLEY told Russo quoted Phelan as to wreck Dist. Atty. Jim Gar- sons who contacted him on him the, group had been warning him that Garrison rison's Kennedy death plot in- behalf of NBC as Walter Sher- "working closely with the de- would "leave me standing in vestigation. idan of the NBC news staff, .-1 See PROBE—Page 7 the cold all alone and that I Russo met the piess in the would be the only one who would get hurt. DA's office shortly. before 2 Garrison appeared briefly p. m. and told newsmen an at the start of the news con- NBC representative offered to Continued from Front Page ference, but said he had "set me up in California" if nohting more to say about fense" and had been swapping NBC and its critical presenta- he cooperated with the net- information with Shaw's attor- work's attack on Garrison.
    [Show full text]
  • V. Possible Associations Between Jack Ruby and Organized Crime
    802 ix. Lewis J. McWillie Biographical Summary (1153) McWillie was born May 4, 1908, in Kansas City, Mo. He resided in Dallas, Tex., from 1940 to 1958. (1748) In 1941 and 1942, he was employed at the Blue Bonnet Hotel. (1749) He then worked at the Top of the Hill Terrace, a gambling club in Arlington, Tex. (1750) McWillie also ran a gambling house in Fort Worth called the Four Duces. (1751) (1154) In September 1958, McWillie moved to Cuba and managed the Tropicana Casino until May 1960.(1752) He worked as a pitboss at the Capri Hotel-Casino in Cuba from May 1960 to January 2, 1961, when he left Cuba.(1753) McWillie also worked in Aruba and Curacao. (1754) (1155) In 1961, McWillie worked at the Cal-Neva Lodge in Nevada, (1755) and then at the Riverside Hotel, Thunderbird Club, Carousel Club (Las Vegas), and the Horseshoe Club. (1756) In 1978, McWillie was employed at the Holiday Inn Casino in Las Vegas, Nev. (1757) Treatment by the Warren Commission (1156) The FBI interviewed McWillie about his relationship with Ruby on two occasions. (1758) McWillie was not interviewed by War- ren Commission staff, nor did he testify before the Commission. (1157) McWillie was mentioned in the Warren Report, which stated that in September 1959, Ruby went to Cuba to visit "a close friend and known gambler, Lewis J. McWillie." (1759) (1158) According to the Report, McWillie left Cuba in January 1961,* and in 1963, Ruby sent him a pistol in Las Vegas, "but McWillie did not accept the package." (1760) The Report concluded by stating : The Commission has found no evidence that McWillie has engaged in any activities since leaving Cuba that are related to pro- or anti-Castro political movements or that he was involved in Ruby's abortive jeep transaction.(1761) (1159) An appendix to the Warren Report included the following : Ruby apparently met McWillie in about 1950 when Me- Willie operated a Dallas nightclub.
    [Show full text]
  • Novenq-,R 25, 1993 Rebecca Sinkler 4 Yawkey Way Editor Fenway Park
    Novenq-,r 25, 1993 Rebecca Sinkler 4 Yawkey Way editor Fenway Park The New York Times Book Review Boston, MA 02215 229 West 43rd Street New York, NY 10036 Dear Editor: The purpose of this letter is to issue a respectful but firm dissent to the recent flurry of endorsements of Mr. Gerald Posner's book, Case Closed. Mr. Posner's book is not the "compelling account... of what probably did happen in Dallas," as heralded in the review by Mr. Geoffrey C. Ward in The New York Times, Sunday, November 21, 1993. Neither is it an "always conclusive destruction of one Kennedy assassination conspiracy theory after another," as Tom Wicker writes on the jacket cover. In fact, Case Closed is factually innaccurate and misleading, despite the acclaim granted to Mr. Posner during the last several months in both the electronic and print media. In reality, Case Closed is no less a sham than many books published on both sides of the conspiracy issue since the events in Dallas, 1963. Allow me to demonstrate: The Single Bullet Theory Of all the assassination theories, the Single Bullet Theory is certainly the grandest of them all. It is the cornerstone of any case against Lee Harvey Oswald or any other lone gunman. Conspiracy or not, all scholars of the case can not ignore the inescapable fact that the Single Bullet Theory is, itself, only a theory, not a fact. It is almost universally accepted that the lone gunman scenario requires no more than three shots. It also asks that one bullet be responsible for multiple wounds and physical damage in two men: An entrance and exit wound in the president; an entrance wound beneath the right rear armpit in Governor Connally; a fractured rib in the Governor; an exit wound out the Governors chest; an entrance wound in his wrist; a fractured wrist; an exit wound from his hand; and still a final entrance wound (superficial) in his thigh.
    [Show full text]
  • Oswald's Destination at the Time of the Tippit Shooting, July 11, 1964” of the David Belin Papers at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 2, folder “Oswald's Destination at the Time of the Tippit Shooting, July 11, 1964” of the David Belin Papers at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 2 of the David Belin Papers at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library 7-ll-64 Sn tbe Mtlranl1a ~ vezue, b~ 1l1SJ."ee ~~ ~ · the~--""' .w oft tbll Dtdn tiiiiii'OIIdl.f bl.oc:l1t tNtq I 1 » I .......... ... ..... ......... __... Oswald's Destination at the TUne of the Tippit Shooting. Since Lee Oswald shot police officer J. D. Tippit while headed in the general direction of Jack Ruby's apartment, approximately two-thirds of a mile from the 449/ scene of the shooting,--- some persons have speculated that Oswald was headed toward a rendezvous with Ruby. At the time of the Tippit shooting Ruby was either at the Dallas Morning News or enroute from that building I \ to the Carousel Club.
    [Show full text]
  • HSCA Volume I: 9/6/78
    62 Sir, will you stand and raise your right hand to be sworn. Do you solemnly swear the testimony you will give before this committee is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help you God? Mr. GRODEN. I do. Chairman STOKES. Thank you. You may be seated. TESTIMONY OF ROBERT GRODEN Chairman STOKES. The Chair recognizes Mr. Mickey Goldsmith, counsel for the committee . Mr. GOLDSMITH. Mr. Groden, would you please state your name and occupation for the record? Mr. GRODEN. Robert Groden, photo-optics technician. Mr. GOLDSMrrH. Mr. Groden, would you move the mike closer to you. Thank you. Now, Mr. Groden, in your capacity as a consultant to this com- mittee, what has been your major responsibility? Mr. GRODEN. My major responsibility was to present to the com- mittee those issues dealing with photographic evidence that it was felt could be scientifically addressed, perhaps improved upon as the knowledge of the critics has lasted through these years and per- haps give new information relating to those particular photographs and films. Mr. GOLDSMITH. Mr. Groden, to what extent, if any, has the information you have been giving to this committee been limited to those issues that you personally thought to have merit? Mr. GRODEN. No, all of the issues to which I felt there was merit, I was given freedom to address, but also, additional issues which, perhaps, were not of my belief but certainly were raised by credible critics as well. Mr. GOLDSMITH. So basically, then, you saw your responsibilities as a consultant to advise the committee generally, and not just with regard to those issues with which you had worked; is that correct? Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Joy Dale by WFAA
    - Commission Exhibit No . 2158 WPM-TV reel PKT 30 November 24, 1963 HEM= . I don't know, I didn't see any others at all. LITEPVM WITH JOY DALE BY WFAA-TV q. Mr . Bentley, are you familiar with the subject? Q. Will yon give Your name, please? BEM.EY. No, I bad never seen him before at all . DALE . Joy Dale . Q. Mr . Bentley, what is your first name again, please? Q. Joy, what do you do? HENT wr . Paul, Paul Bentley. DALE . I dance at the Carousel . COtMfMA10R . Was captured yesterday in a Dallas theatre. Q. Did you s y dance? What kind of dance? What do you mean? This is Detective Paul Bentley who was among the officers who arrested Oswald yesterday near a theatre in a suburban section DALE . I work with fans In the exotle dancing. of Dallas . He just described his injuries . He was an eyewitness Q. You are an exotic dancer at the Carousel owned end to the capture of the mm charged with the murder of the President operated by Jack Ruby? of the United State. This is Nelson Henton at Reline Police Headquarters . DATA . That's right. Q. Bow COMMISSION EXHIBIT NO. 2157-Continued long have you been working for Jack Ruby? DALE . About two or three months . Q. Are you a Dallas girl? DALE . Yes, I am . Q. What, what do you think of Jack? DALE. I think he 1s a very swell person . COMMISSION EXHIBIT NO . 2158 -9- Q . Has Jack helped you in any particular _y7 Q . Did he, did you start dancing, did you start your career at the Carousel Club under the tutelage of Jack MWI DALE .
    [Show full text]
  • Warren Commission, Volume XIV: CE 2160
    _ Commission Exhibit 2160 NBC-TV reel 15 2 November 22, 1963 Actually the suspect was about five ten and had discarded the jacket PRESS INTERVIEl1 WITH 3GT. GERALD HILL POLICE DEPA17ThQ"DiT DALLAS ich w found in the Oak Cliff area near a funeral home in the 400 block of East Jefferson, and at the time we arrested the suspect his HILL . The FBI who was in at the arrest with this office . pistol was again fully loaded and we had a witness that said he caw Q. Sir, did he make any statement? Did he say anything other the suspect stop long enough to reload his pistol after shooting the than 'inis is it"? officer. HILL . He did not admit to us while we had him in custody any Q. What did you find in the of the accusations either of shooting the officer or of any other building? Q. Near where the President was shot from? crime that could have been committed. He started demanding that he HILL . In the building on the sixth floor be allowed to see a lawyer and started talking about his rights-- we found an area that, near a window, that had partially been wouldn't even admit that he pulled the trigger on the gun in the blocked off by boxes of books, and also the three spent shells that had apparently been fired from t. .-tre . Actually we didn't receive any information as to the actual a rifle . Also we found the remnants of what could have contents of the crime from him for the entire trip to the station.
    [Show full text]
  • Jack Ruby, Oswald and the Cuban Connection
    The News , Jack Ruby, Oswald and the Part 5 of a series Following is the fifth article in a seven- based on other information we had part serialization of Kantor's book. from the CIA and FBI in April 1964. I World now believe the FBI should be asked to By SETH KANTOR disclose all information about the pur- poses of those 1959 contacts with Ruby and the information he was asked to After the Jack Ruby trial ended, provide, if they have not already done Leon Hubert and Burt Griffin, the so." Cuban Warrren Commission's two Ruby ex- THE FBI SO FAR has said the con- perts, tried to convince commission tacts were useless, that Ruby provided of jail in Cuba (at a time when Castro members in memorandums on March no worthwhile information. But what 19 and April 1, 1964, that there was had several U.S. underworld figures Griffin is suggesting here is something jailed there). Ruby meets McKeown in "substantial evidence" showing Jack different, when he asks that the FBI Ruby had maintained unexplained Kemah, Texas, and offers $25,000 for make public now what kinds of infor- a personal introduction to Castro. Cuban associations. But their efforts mation the bureau was seeking from were blocked by the CIA and dis- March 11—Ruby meets with Dallas Ruby in 1959. FBI agent Flynn and agrees to become couraged by others on the commission "If Hoover concealed information staff. an FBI contact. that the 1959 FBI contacts were about March 15—Throughout this time Therefore, the Warren Commission Cuban matter," Griffin says, "such a never explored the possible links of period, Ruby telephones and meets concealment would be important and with Tom Davis, a gun-runner with Ruby's Cuban activities in 1959 with serious." his FBI contacts that year and with CIA ties, in Beaumont, Ruby's totally unexplained use of a April 2—The Dallas police depart- safety deposit box at the time of his By December 1977, the FBI released ment's Criminal Intelligence Division Cuban and FBI interests.
    [Show full text]
  • THE TAKING of AMERICA, 1-2-3 by Richard E
    THE TAKING OF AMERICA, 1-2-3 by Richard E. Sprague Richard E. Sprague 1976 Limited First Edition 1976 Revised Second Edition 1979 Updated Third Edition 1985 About the Author 2 Publisher's Word 3 Introduction 4 1. The Overview and the 1976 Election 5 2. The Power Control Group 8 3. You Can Fool the People 10 4. How It All BeganÐThe U-2 and the Bay of Pigs 18 5. The Assassination of John Kennedy 22 6. The Assassinations of Robert Kennedy and Dr. Martin Luther King and Lyndon B. Johnson's Withdrawal in 1968 34 7. The Control of the KennedysÐThreats & Chappaquiddick 37 8. 1972ÐMuskie, Wallace and McGovern 41 9. Control of the MediaÐ1967 to 1976 44 10. Techniques and Weapons and 100 Dead Conspirators and Witnesses 72 11. The Pardon and the Tapes 77 12. The Second Line of Defense and Cover-Ups in 1975-1976 84 13. The 1976 Election and Conspiracy Fever 88 14. Congress and the People 90 15. The Select Committee on Assassinations, The Intelligence Community and The News Media 93 16. 1984 Here We ComeÐ 110 17. The Final Cover-Up: How The CIA Controlled The House Select Committee on Assassinations 122 Appendix 133 -2- About the Author Richard E. Sprague is a pioneer in the ®eld of electronic computers and a leading American authority on Electronic Funds Transfer Systems (EFTS). Receiving his BSEE degreee from Purdue University in 1942, his computing career began when he was employed as an engineer for the computer group at Northrup Aircraft. He co-founded the Computer Research Corporation of Hawthorne, California in 1950, and by 1953, serving as Vice President of Sales, the company had sold more computers than any competitor.
    [Show full text]
  • Spy Tells Her Story by STEVE DUNLEAV- Partner, Watergate Bur- Days Before Kennedy Superspy Marita Lor- Glar Frank Sturgis, with Was Shot
    Spy tells her story By STEVE DUNLEAV- partner, Watergate bur- days before Kennedy Superspy Marita Lor- glar Frank Sturgis, with was shot. enz broke her silence last threatening her if she Her daughter, Monica night and said: "I don't continued to talk to au- Mercedes Perez (uninez, like being threatened • thorities about facts sur- 15, bought a loaded pis- I can be dangerous . rounding the Kennedy tol on Monday to protect my daughter can be dan- assassination. She has her mother from 53- gerous." claimed she and Sturgis year-old Sturgis. Miss Lorenz has ac- went to Dallas with Lee "Fm very proud of my cused her old espionage Harvey Oswald a few Continued on Page .1 Continued from Page 1 And she confirmed that if daughter for protecting me," she did write a book, it she said from her luxury would be sizzling. apartment on East 88th "Love letters from Cas- Street. tro," she said, then perhaps, POLICE GUARD realizing she might be break- She made the statement ing orders to keep silent, while holed up with five de- added: "I can't talk. I can't w tectives, two of them armed say anything." with shotguns. Miss Lorenz, who has The detectives have barred claimed In the past that she reporters from the building, is a crack pistol shot, was refuse to take her out to Fidel Castro's mistress for eat and taste test food that eight months. is ordered in from onside. After being recruited by In a disjointed talk, Miss Sturgis for the assassination Lorenz said she had not of Castro, she landed in slept for two days and was Havana with a loaded gun.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF EPUB} Report of the Warren Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy by Warren Commission Warren Commission - Introduction
    Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Report of the Warren Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy by Warren Commission Warren Commission - Introduction. President Lyndon B. Johnson appointed the President's Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy, commonly called the Warren Commission, by Executive Order (E.O. 11130) on November 29, 1963. Its purpose was to investigate the assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy on November 22, 1963, at Dallas, Texas. President Johnson directed the Commission to evaluate matters relating to the assassination and the subsequent killing of the alleged assassin, and to report its findings and conclusions to him. The following members served on the Commission: Earl Warren, Chief Justice of the United States, former Governor and attorney general of California, Chair; , Democratic Senator from Georgia and chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, former Governor of Georgia, and county attorney in that State; John Sherman Cooper, Republican Senator from Kentucky, former county and circuit judge in Kentucky, and United States Ambassador to India; Hale Boggs, Democratic Representative from Louisiana and majority whip in the House of Representatives; Gerald R. Ford, Republican Representative from Michigan and chairman of the House Republican Conference; Allen W. Dulles, lawyer and former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency; John J. McCloy, lawyer, former President of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and former United States High Commissioner for Germany. On December 13, 1963, Congress passed Senate Joint Resolution 137 (Public Law 88-202) authorizing the Commission to subpoena witnesses and obtain evidence concerning any matter relating to the investigation. The resolution also gave the Commission the power to compel the testimony of witnesses by granting immunity from prosecution to witnesses testifying under compulsion.
    [Show full text]