Genetic Signature and Treatment of Pediatric High‑Grade Glioma
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY 14: 70, 2021 Genetic signature and treatment of pediatric high‑grade glioma MILENA GUIDI1, LAURA GIUNTI2, ANNA MARIA BUCCOLIERO3, CHIARA CAPORALINI3, MARIA LUIGIA CENSULLO1, LUISA GALLI4, LORENZO GENITORI5 and IACOPO SARDI1 1Neuro‑Oncology Unit, Department of Pediatric Oncology, 2Medical Genetics Unit, 3Pathology Unit, Meyer Children's University Hospital; 4Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 5Neurosurgery Unit, Meyer Children's University Hospital, I‑50139 Florence, Italy Received January 7, 2020; Accepted November 13, 2020 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2021.2232 Abstract. Pediatric high‑grade glioma (HGG) is a type the H3F3A K27M mutation had a worse prognosis compared of malignancy that carries a poor prognosis. The genetic with wild‑type patients (P=0.0045). Moreover, 3/5 patients analysis of HGGs has previously identified useful mutations, with the BRAF V600E mutation had HGGs that were derived the targeting of which has improved prognosis. Thus, further from a previous low‑grade glioma (LGG; P=0.001). In conclu‑ research into the more common mutations, such as H3 histone sion, these results suggested that histone H3 mutations may variants (HIST1H3B and H3F3A) and BRAF V600E, may help predict the outcome in patients with HGG. In addition, be useful in identifying tumors with different prognoses, as the BRAF V600E mutation was found to be associated with the mutations are considered to drive two distinct oncogenic an increased risk of anaplastic progression. The novel data programs. The present study performed a retrospective anal‑ of the present study may help better define the clinical and ysis of pediatric HGGs. In total, 42 cases of HGG, including radiological characteristics of glioma. 32 cases (76.1%) of anaplastic astrocytoma and 10 cases (23.8%) of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), were assessed. Introduction The median age of the patients was 7 years (range, 0‑32 years). Mutations on histone H3, in particular the K27M and G34R Anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) and glioblastoma (GBM) repre‑ mutations in the distinct variants HIST1H3B and H3F3A, sent ~20% of all central nervous system (CNS) tumors. These in addition to the presence of the BRAF V600E mutation, two brain tumor subtypes respond poorly to therapy and they were analyzed in 24 patients. The H3F3A K27M mutation are the most biologically aggressive malignancies and the prin‑ was identified in 7 patients (29.1%), while the HIST1H3B cipal cause of cancer‑related mortality and morbidity during K27M mutation was only observed in 1 patient with GBM. In childhood (1). Although the outcome of pediatric high‑grade addition, 5 patients harbored a BRAF V600E mutation (21%), gliomas (HGGs) is marginally superior to that of their adult while the H3F3A G34R mutation was not recorded in any of counterparts, it remains poor, despite aggressive treatment (2). the patients. The overall survival of the wild‑type patients The two main prognostic factors are the primary loca‑ at 20 months was 68% [confidence interval (CI): 38‑85%] tion and resectability. Currently, up to 85% of patients with compared with 28% (CI: 0.4‑60%) in patients with the H3F3A hemispheric GBM succumb to the disease within 2 years of K27M mutation. These results suggested that patients with diagnosis (3). The genetic alterations involved in the patho‑ genesis of pediatric HGGs, particularly the role of somatic driver mutations (K27M) in the histone H3 genes (H3F3 and H1ST1H3B), were previously investigated. Another mutation in H3F3A, G34R/V, has also been described, and appears to Correspondence to: Dr Iacopo Sardi, Neuro‑Oncology Unit, be more frequent among young adults (4). Department of Pediatric Oncology, Meyer Children's University The histone methyltransferases are responsible for the Hospital, 24 Viale Gaetano Pieraccini, I‑50139 Florence, Italy methylation of histone H3 at Lys27 and the K27M mutation E‑mail: [email protected] replaces lysine with methionine, while the G34V/R mutation in amino acid 34 initiates the replacement of glycine with Abbreviations: AA, anaplastic astrocytoma; CNS, central nervous system; DIPG, diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma; GBM, glioblastoma either valine or arginine (5). Histone proteins undergo modifi‑ multiforme; HDCT, high‑dose chemotherapy; HGG, high‑grade glioma; cations, such as acetylation, methylation and phosphorylation, LGG, low‑grade glioma; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression‑free which are mediated by writers (methyltransferases), erasers survival; SDCT, standard‑dose chemotherapy (demethylases) and readers (which recognize specific histone modifications). These mechanisms on histone tails are impor‑ Key words: glioblastoma, high‑grade glioma, histone 3, midline tant in facilitating gene transcription (6). It is well‑established glioma, oncology, pediatric, H3F3A K27M, BRAF V600E that the misregulation of histone lysine methylation is impli‑ cated in the occurrence and development of numerous types of cancer (4); however, the role of the K27M mutation in the development of glioma remains unclear. 2 GUIDI et al: MUTATIONS IN PEDIATRIC HIGH‑GRADE GLIOMAS Considering the clinical implications, H3.3K27M muta‑ Table I. Clinical characteristics of the patients. tions have been found to be associated with poor prognosis of pediatric HGGs, which appear to have diffuse growth Characteristics No. (%) patterns and a midline localization. This group is classified as diffuse midline glioma, H3K27M‑mutant, and includes Age, years previously defined entities, such as diffuse intrinsic pontine Median (range) 7 (0‑32) glioma (DIPG) (7). <3 10 Furthermore, the two main histone H3 variants have been >3 32 associated with distinct biological characteristics, thereby Sex driving different oncogenic programs. Tumors with mutated Female 20 (47.6) H1ST1H3B were found to be less aggressive and more respon‑ Male 22 (52.4) sive to radiotherapy and standard treatment. Histone H3F3A Tumor histology and HIST1H3B K27M mutations in HGGs help define the Anaplastic astrocytoma 32 (76.1) two subgroups of HGG, which exhibit different prognoses and Glioblastoma multiforme 10 (23.8) phenotypes (8). Mutations in patients aged >3 years (n=24) The BRAF V600E mutation is commonly present in xanthoastrocytomas and gangliogliomas, but it has also been H3F3A K27M 7 (29.1) described in diffuse astrocytoma and low‑grade glioma (LGG). H1ST1H3B K27M 1 (4.1) It was previously demonstrated that the presence of mutations H3F3A G34R 0 has diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic potential. In fact, BRAF V600 E 5 (20.8) BRAF mutations may help differentiate benign from aggres‑ IDH 0 sive cancers; tumors with a BRAF V600E mutation were P53 0 strongly associated with an increased risk of progression and development of a secondary cancer with anaplastic evolution. Moreover, BRAF mutations were suggested as possible targets for the improved adjuvant treatment of residual or recurrent forward, GTCTCTGCAGGCAAGCTTTT and reverse, tumors (9); no patients with double‑mutant tumors (H3 and CAACTCGGTCGACTTTTGGT. BRAF) were identified. For the molecular analysis of the genes, the coding In the present study, the presence of mutations and their portions and the respective flanking regions were amplified by associations with clinical characteristics were compared in PCR. Once the systems were purified by capillary electropho‑ pediatric HGGs, with the aim to define the prognostic role of resis (CE), software analysis was performed. these mutations by comparing the genetic and clinical data with those reported in the existing literature. Statistical analysis. A Student's t‑test was used to compare the levels between the mutated and wild‑type tumors. The log‑rank Materials and methods (Mantel‑Cox) test was used to determine the association between the mutations and overall survival (OS). The patient Patient studies. A total of 42 patients with HGGs recruited outcome (OS) was analyzed using the following clinicopatholog‑ between January 2003 and January 2016 at the Meyer Children's ical and treatment‑related variables: Age, sex, tumor size, stage at University Hospital (Florence, Italy) were considered to be presentation, histological subtype and response to chemotherapy. eligible for inclusion in the present study. Histological diag‑ Survival was measured from the time of diagnosis to the date nosis and tumor grading were performed based on the 2016 of death or the date of the last follow‑up. Survival curves were World Health Organization criteria (10). The diagnoses were drawn using the Kaplan‑Meier product limit method. P<0.05 was confirmed following review by the CNS national panel of considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. pathologists. The study protocol was approved by the institu‑ tional ethics board and informed consent was obtained from Results the parents or legal guardians of all the patients. Patients and treatment. A total of 42 patients were enrolled in Genetic analysis. The majority of the analyses were performed the present study and their main clinicopathological character‑ following DNA extraction from fresh‑frozen tissues using istics are summarized in Table I. The median age at the time a specific protocol (Qiagen GmbH). The sequence analysis of diagnosis was 7 years (range, 0‑32 years), while 10 patients of the coding region of the gene was prepared using the were aged <3 years. All subjects were treated with chemo‑ BigDye Terminator v1.1 Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied therapy and/or radiotherapy according to the clinical studies of Biosystems;