DOCSLIB.ORG

Past Masters® Series New and Forthcoming Releases 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Past Masters® Series New and Forthcoming Releases 2018 INTELEX® CORPORATION PAST MASTERS® SERIES NEW AND FORTHCOMING RELEASES 2018 InteLex Corporation’s Past Masters series encompasses the largest collection of full-text electronic editions in philosophy in the world. The series features significant collections in political science, religious studies, education, French and German studies, sociology, philosophy of science, economics, and classics. InteLex acquires and develops definitive editions of the full corpora of the seminal figures in the history of the human sciences, including their unpublished texts, articles, and correspondence. The Past Masters series has opened a new and exciting chapter in the history of scholarly research, and is now being utilized at over 200 research libraries in North America and Europe, and at over 1300 institutions in 46 countries worldwide. In addition to Past Masters: Collected Works, InteLex publishes The English Letters Collection and The Women Writers Collection. The English Letters Collection consists of the letters or correspondence and in some cases the notebooks, diaries, and memoirs of the most significant figures in the history of English literature, politics, culture, religion and the arts. The Women Writers Collection consists of primary works, letters, journals and notebooks from important women writers in the English language. InteLex Corporation proudly announces Past Masters Commons, a new offering in our Past Masters series. Past Masters Commons includes historically important texts and translations which have been newly edited for accuracy as well as modern scholarship. Most collections will be offered in XML format. All texts in Past Masters Commons will be offered at no charge to our existing institutional web customers; and new institutional customers will receive all Past Masters Commons titles at no charge. INTELEX CORPORATION 106 WEST SOUTH STREET, SUITE 206 P.O. Box 859 CHARLOTTESVILLE VA 22902 U.S.A. Tel. 888.INTELEX (468.3539) 434-970-2286 Fax: 434-970-2286 Email: [email protected] W W W . N L X . C O M INTELEX PAST MASTERS NEW RELEASES: TITLES LIST ST. BONAVENTURE: WORKS (SECOND RELEASE) WILHELM DILTHEY: GESAMMELTE SCHRIFTEN ISBN: 978-1-57085-149-0 ISBN: 978-1-57085-137-7 Language: English translation (with some original Latin text) Language: German Added to First Release: For a complete bibliography, please visit our website at http://www.nlx.com. Commentary on the Sentences: The Philosophy of God. Volume 16 of The Works of St. Bonaventure. Translation, Introduction, and Notes by R. E. Houser and Timothy B. Noone. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute THE COLLECTED WORKS OF BERNARD Publications, 2014. MANDEVILLE Commentary on the Sentences: Sacraments. Volume 17 of The Works of St. ISBN: 978-1-57085-139-5 Bonaventure. Translation, Introduction, and Notes by J. A. Wayne Hellman, Timothy R. LeCroy, and Luke Davis Townsend. St. Bonaventure, NY: Language: Latin, English translation Franciscan Institute Publications, 2016. For a complete bibliography, please visit our website at http://www.nlx.com. JOHN DUNS SCOTUS: OPERA PHILOSOPHICA ET MISCELLANIA - LATIN CRITICAL EDITIONS EARLY COMMENTARIES ON THE RULE OF THE (SECOND RELEASE) FRIARS MINOR ISBN: 978-1-57085-240-4 ISBN: 978-1-57085-163-6 Language: Latin, English translation Language: Latin, English translation Added to First Release: Early Commentaries on the Rule of the Friars Minor. Volume 1. Edited by David Flood, OFM. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute The Report of the Paris Lecture Reportatio IV-A. Edited from manuscript Publications, 2014. and translated by Oleg V. Bychkov; edited by R. Trent Pomplun. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute Publications, 2016. Early Commentaries on the Rule of the Friars Minor. Volume 2. Edited by David Flood, OFM. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute Publications, 2017. EARLY FRANCISCAN SOURCES: FRANCIS OF ASSISI, Early Commentaries on the Rule of the Friars Minor. Volume 3. Edited by CLARE OF ASSISI, AND ISABELLE OF FRANCE David Burr. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute Publications, 2015. ISBN: 978-1-57085-159-9 Language: English translation ADAM DE WODEHAM: LECTURA SECUNDA Francis of Assisi. Studies in Early Franciscan Sources: Writings of Francis of ISBN: 978-1-57085-164-3 Assisi: Letters and Prayers. Volume 1. Edited by Michael W. Blastic, O.F.M., Language: Latin Jay M. Hammond, Ph.D., and J.A. Wayne Hellmann, O.F.M. Conv. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute Publications, 2011. Adam de Wodeham. Lectura Secunda (Quaestiones in I Sententiarum Petri Lombardi). St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute Publications, 1991. __________. Studies in Early Franciscan Sources: Writings of Francis of Assisi: Rules, Testament and Admonitions. Volume 2. Edited by Michael W. Blastic, Volume I: Prologus et distinctio 1 edited by Rega Wood. O.F.M., Jay M. Hammond, Ph.D., and J.A. Wayne Hellmann, O.F.M. Volume II: Distinctiones 2-7 edited by Gedeon Gal, OFM. Conv. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute Publications, 2011. Volume III: Distinctiones 8-26 edited by Rega Wood. Clare of Assisi. Studies in Early Franciscan Sources: Writings of Clare of Assisi: Letters, Form of Life, Blessing. Volume 3. Edited by Michael W. Blastic, O.F.M., Jay M. Hammond, Ph.D., and J.A. Wayne Hellmann, O.F.M. Conv. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute Publications, 2011. FRANCISCAN MEDIEVAL PHILOSOPHY SERIES Isabelle of France. Studies in Early Franciscan Sources: The Rules of Isabelle ISBN: 978-1-57085-175-9 of France. Volume 4. Introduction and Translation by Sean L. Field ; Language: Latin, English translation additional documents translated by Larry F. Field. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute Publications, 2013. From Franciscan Institute Publications, works in Latin or English translation of Walter Burleigh, John de la Rochelle, Henrici de Werla, Nicholas Minorita, Paul of Pergula, Paul of Venice, Peter Aureoli, Petrus Thomae, THE WORKS OF PETER OF JOHN OLIVI John E. Lynch, Guidonis de Orchellis, Anthony of Padua, and John Pecham. For a complete bibliography, please visit our website at http://www.nlx.com. ISBN: 978-1-57085-161-2 Language: English translation with some original Latin For a complete bibliography, please visit our website at http://www.nlx.com. Astonishing in breadth and depth, the content in this formidable file, as well as the research material included in every one of the scholarly editions available, is superb throughout. This title should be owned by every research library serving serious scholars in the humanities. —Cheryl LaGuardia, Library Journal, June 2015.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Theories of Truth. Bibliography on Primary Medieval Authors
    Theories of Truth. Bibliography on Primary Medieval Authors https://www.ontology.co/biblio/truth-medieval-authors.htm Theory and History of Ontology by Raul Corazzon | e-mail: [email protected] History of Truth. Selected Bibliography on Medieval Primary Authors The Authors to which I will devote an entire page are marked with an asterisk (*). Hilary of Poitiers Augustine of Hippo (*) Boethius (*) Isidore of Seville John Scottus Eriugena (*) Isaac Israeli Avicenna (*) Anselm of Canterbury (*) Peter Abelard (*) Philip the Chancellor Robert Grosseteste William of Auvergne Albert the Great Bonaventure Thomas Aquinas (*) Henry of Ghent Siger of Brabant John Duns Scotus (*) Hervaeus Natalis Giles of Rome Durandus of St. Pourçain Peter Auriol Walter Burley William of Ockham (*) Robert Holkot John Buridan (*) 1 di 14 22/09/2016 09:25 Theories of Truth. Bibliography on Primary Medieval Authors https://www.ontology.co/biblio/truth-medieval-authors.htm Gregory of Rimini William of Heytesbury Peter of Mantua Paul of Venice Hilary of Poitiers (ca. 300 - 368) Texts 1. Meijering, E.P. 1982. Hilary of Poitiers on the Trinity. De Trinitate 1, 1-19, 2, 3. Leiden: Brill. In close cooperation with J. C. M: van Winden. On truth see I, 1-14. Studies Augustine of Hippo ( 354 - 430) Texts Studies 1. Boyer, Charles. 1921. L'idée De Vérité Dans La Philosophie De Saint Augustin. Paris: Gabriel Beauchesne. 2. Kuntz, Paul G. 1982. "St. Augustine's Quest for Truth: The Adequacy of a Christian Philosophy." Augustinian Studies no. 13:1-21. 3. Vilalobos, José. 1982. Ser Y Verdad En Agustín De Hipona. Sevilla: Publicaciones de la Universidad de Sevilla.
    [Show full text]
  • PAULUS NICOLETTUS VENETUS, Sophismata Aurea
    PAULUS NICOLETTUS VENETUS, Sophismata aurea [Golden Sophisms] In Latin, decorated manuscript on paper Northern Italy, Reggio d’Emilia (Ferrara?) or Padua?, dated 1417 65 ff., complete (collation: i-iii12, iv-v10, vi9 [10-1, with last leaf of quire likely a cancelled blank]), on paper (a number of watermarks, respectively close to (1) Briquet, no. 2637-2638: “Basilic” (e.g. f. 7), Reggio-d’Emilia, 1404, Ferrara, 1406, Udine, 1402-1408; see also Briquet no. 2663: Ferrara, 1417; (2) Briquet, no. 809: “Arc” (e.g. f. 27), Siena, 1410: Lucca, 1423 [but also Cologne, 1419]; (3) Briquet, no. 11687:“Monts” (e. g. f. 57), Padova, 1408-1415 or Briquet, no. 11689, Florence, 1411-1421 or Pisa, 1416), written in a tight and highly abridged gothic bookhand by a single hand (except table of contents on f. 65v, by a different although contemporary hand), text in two columns, quire signatures, a few catchwords (e.g. fol. 24v), paper ruled in brown ink (justification 186 x 140 mm.), paragraph marks in red, some capitals struck in red, painted initials in red or blue throughout, some larger parti-colored initials in red and blue, a variety of contemporary or slightly later marginal annotations and corrections (worthy of in-depth study). Bound in uncovered pasteboard, spine reinforced with snippets of inscribed parchment, spine sewn on three raised thongs left apparent, covers and spine meant to subsequently receive a leather covering (unfinished), pastedowns lined with reused paper copied in a cursive bâtarde script in brown ink, containing excerpts from Italian notarial documents pertaining to the town of Novalino (?) (another form for Nodano, near Brescia?) and the monastery of San Pietro de Novalino and dated 1504 (Some foxing, a few waterstains, mostly marginal, first paper leaf darkened, perhaps due to past exposure, still completely legible).
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Abattouy, M. (1996) "Galileo's Manuscript 72: Genesis of the New Science of Motion (Padua ca. 1600-1609)," Preprint 48. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Agazzi, Evandro, David Grunder, and Jaakko Hintikka (eds.) (1981) Proceedings of the 1978 Pisa Conference on the History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 1, Dordrecht: Reidel Aiton, E. J. (1972) The Vortex Theory of Planetary Motions, London: Elsevier Allaire, Edwin B. (1966) "'Tractatus' 6.3751," in: I. M. Copi and R. W. Beard (eds.) 1966, 189-194 Aquinas, Thomas (1963) Commentary on Aristotle's Physics (ed. and transl. by R. J. Blackwell, R. J. Spath, W. E. Thirlkel) London: Routledge Archimedes (1953) The Works of Archimedes (ed. by T. L. Heath) New York: Dover Arend, G. (1998) Die Mechanik des Niccoli> Tartaglia im Kontext der zeitgenossischen Erkenntnis- und Wissenschaftstheorie, Munchen: Institut fUr Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften Ariew, Roger (1986) "Descartes as Critic of Galileo's Scientific Methodology," Synthese 67, 77-90 Aris, Rutherford, and H. Ted Davis (eds.) (1983) Springs of Scientific Creativity. Essays on Founders of Modern Science, Univ. of Minnesota Press Aristotle (1984) The Complete Works of Aristotle (ed. by J. Barnes) Princeton Univ. Press Armogathe, Jean-Robert and Giulia Belgioioso (1996) Descartes: Principia philosophiae (1644 - 1994), (atti del convegno per i1350. anniversario della pubblicazione dell'opera, Parigi, 5 - 6 maggio 1994, Leece, 10 - 12 novembre 1994), Naples: Vivarium, 1996 Barbin, Evelyn, Eliane Bonnefon, Michele Choliere, Gilles Hard, Xavier Lefort, Christiane Lize (1987) Mathematiques, arts et techniques au XVI/eme siecle, Publications de L' Universite Du Maine, no. 4, Le Mans: Equipe I.R.E.M., La Fette-Bernard: Bellanger Barbin, Evelyne, and Michele Choliere (1987) "La Trajectoire des projectiles de Tartaglia a Galilee," in: E.
    [Show full text]
  • Ockham and Chatton on Judgment FUP Final
    [Published in Intentionality, Cognition and Mental Representation, in Gyula Klima (ed.) Medieval Philosophy (Fordham University Press, forthcoming)] HOW CHATTON CHANGED OCKHAM ’S MIND : WILLIAM OCKHAM AND WALTER CHATTON ON OBJECTS AND ACTS OF JUDGMENT Susan Brower-Toland Recent scholarship has begun to uncover the nature and extent of the reciprocal—and typically adversarial—relationship between William Ockham (d. 1347) and Walter Chatton (d. 1343). We now know, for example, that Chatton, a slightly younger contemporary of Ockham, is both enormously influenced by and, at the same time, highly critical of his older colleague; he often takes up precisely those questions Ockham treats (and likewise the terminology and conceptual framework in which he expresses them) only to reject Ockham’s conclusions. 1 We also know that Chatton’s criticisms leave their mark on Ockham. Ockham frequently rehearses and responds to Chatton’s objections, occasionally refining or even altogether revising his views in light of them. Perhaps the best-documented case of such influence concerns Ockham’s developing views of concepts, where, in direct response to Chatton’s criticisms, Ockham famously abandons his early “fictum” theory of concepts in favor of Chatton’s own “mental-act” account. 2 Although this may be the best-document case, it is by no means the only example of such influence—a handful of others have been discussed in the literature. 3 In this paper, I hope to extend our current understanding of the relationship between these two Franciscan thinkers by looking in some detail at a debate between them over the objects of judgment. The broad outlines of Ockham’s place in the development of the later medieval debate about judgment are fairly well drawn.
    [Show full text]
  • ' IP Paul of Venice's Name Is Mainly Spoken of in Connection with His Ne Log- Ical Works, the Logica Pa
    INTRODUCTION 1. Paul of Venice’s Intellectual Profile Paul of Venice’s name is mainly spoken of in connection with his ne log- ical works, the Logica Parva, the Logica Magna and the Sophismata aurea. Paul, however, was one of the leading philosophers of his time and his con- tributions cover a vast area of discourse, including theology, psychology, ontology and theory of knowledge. He also took a strong interest in Aris- totle’s philosophy and his commentaries may in a sense be regarded as the point of arrival of a long tradition of understanding and interpretation of Aristotle’s texts. We have rather scanty information about the details of Paul’s life. Also the dates of some of his major works are still uncertain.1 Paolo Nicoletti was born in Udine, a town in the north-eastern part of Italy, in 1369. When he was fourteen he joined the Augustinian Order and entered the convent of Santo Stefano in Venice. He completed his literary and theological education in the general studium of the order in Padua, a sort of excellence school for the most gifted pupils of the province. In the summer of 1390 Paul was sent to Oxford, where he remained for three years. The Oxford years were bound to have a lasting efect on Paul’s philosophical inclinations. It is in Oxford that he became acquainted with the works of the English reformer John Wyclif and with those of his immediate followers, and so chose the defence of ontological realism as one of the leading motives of his philosophical career.
    [Show full text]
  • PAULUS VENETUS, Logica Parva
    LES ENLUMINURES, LTD LES ENLUMINURES Le Louvre des Antiquaires 2970 North Lake Shore Drive 11B 2, Place du Palais-Royal Chicago, Illinois 60657 34, allée Riesener 75001 Paris tel 1-773-929-5986 tél : 33 1 42 60 15 58 fax 1-773-528-3976 fax : 33 1 40 15 00 25 PAULUS NICOLETTUS VENETUS, Logica parva [followed by] PAULUS PERGULENSIS, Tractatus de sensu composito et diviso In Latin, illustrated manuscript on paper Italy, Perugia, dated 1475 89 folios, complete, mostly in quires of 10 (i-viii10, ix9[10-1], last folio blank, no text lacking), on paper (watermarks closest to Briquet 11960 “Navire,” Florence, 1480), written in light brown ink in a slanted cursive script on up to 36 lines, text on two columns (justification 170 x 100 mm.) mm), vertical catchwords, rubrics in light red ink, paragraph marks in light red ink, numerous marginal annotations often signaled by red paragraph marks, spaces left for planned initials (often empty), 2 initials painted in red opening the second treatise (f. 87), ONE 5-LINE INITIAL, marking the beginning of the first treatise, in pink and burnished gold with black infill speckled with white on a burnished gold ground with colored acanthus leaves, flowers and burnished gold besants extending in the margin, TWO COLUMN-WIDE COLORED DIAGRAMS IN GREEN AND YELLOW WASH (ff. 3v and 7v). Bound in late sixteenth- or early seventeenth-century hard vellum over cardboard, back sewn on four raised thongs, title gilt “Tract. de comp. et divis.,” first compartment containing black imprint of pontifical arms and pope’s initial GRE XIII [Gregory XIII, 1572-1585], third compartment containing Jesuit initials IHS in a roundel with letters VCG [V.
    [Show full text]
  • A Companion to the Latin Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle's
    A Companion to the Latin Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s Metaphysics Edited by Fabrizio Amerini and Gabriele Galluzzo LEIDEN • BOSTON 2014 © 2014 Koninklijke Brill NV ISBN 978-90-04-26128-0 CONTENTS Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 Fabrizio Amerini and Gabriele Galluzzo Latin Medieval Translations of Aristotle’s Metaphysics ...................... 19 Marta Borgo The Commentator: Averroes’s Reading of the Metaphysics .............. 59 Matteo di Giovanni Avicenna’s and Averroes’s Interpretations and Their Influence in Albertus Magnus ........................................................................................ 95 Amos Bertolacci English Commentaries before Scotus. A Case Study: The Discussion on the Unity of Being ............................................................................... 137 Silvia Donati Aquinas’s Commentary on the Metaphysics ........................................... 209 Gabriele Galluzzo Giles of Rome’s Questions on the Metaphysics ..................................... 255 Alessandro D. Conti Five Parisian Sets of Questions on the Metaphysics from the 1270s to the 1290s .................................................................................................. 277 Sten Ebbesen Alexander of Alessandria’s Commentary on the Metaphysics .......... 315 Fabrizio Amerini The Questions on the Metaphysics by John Duns Scotus: A Vindication of Pure Intellect .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Medieval Philosophy in Context
    steven p. marrone 1 Medieval philosophy in context What was it like to do philosophy in the Middle Ages? In this chapter I will try to answer that question by looking at relevant sociopolitical and economic circumstances, specific institutional settings for prac- ticing philosophy, and several competing or cooperating intellectual currents. At the end of the chapter, I will say something about the place of authority in medieval thought, the philosophical sources available to medieval thinkers at different points in the period, and the literary genres into which they put their own ideas. Briefly, the story runs as follows. What we know as medieval philosophy emerged in the late Roman Empire from a surprisingly complete mutual accommodation of Christian belief and classical thought. It then passed through centuries of dormancy in the West, while at the same time it began afresh in the Islamic world. In the eleventh and twelfth centuries philosophy reemerged in a new Europe, in altered form and against resistance. Then, both augmented and challenged by the work of Islamic and Jewish thinkers, it enjoyed in the thirteenth century a golden age of systematic analysis and speculation corresponding to a new degree of rationalization in poli- tics and society. And finally? The significance of fourteenth-century thought remains contested, despite substantial recent scholarship demonstrating its brilliance. As my narrative ends, therefore, readers will need to move from context to content, acquainting themselves in succeeding chapters with the ideas and arguments on which their own assessment of medieval philosophy, not just the fourteenth cen- tury, must depend. Before beginning, we should notice an obvious but important fact.
    [Show full text]
  • Commentary on PETER LOMBARD's First Book of the Sentences, Related
    Commentary on PETER LOMBARD’S First Book of the Sentences, related to PAULUS VENETUS, Super primum sententiarum Johannis de Ripa Lecturae Abbreviatio In Latin, decorated manuscript on paper and parchment Northern Italy, 1479 (?) i (unnumbered paper) + 124 + i (unnumbered paper), quires 1-3 (through f. 24v) are all paper, thereafter, paper and parchment alternate, so that quires begin with parchment, and parchment is used for the middle bifolia, watermark, partial and obscured by text, possibly a bow, not in Piccard, incorrect modern foliation in pencil, top, outer corner, 1- 123, with f. 10bis, the text suggests that the manuscript once included additional quires, no missing, at the beginning and end (collation, i10 ii10 [beginning f. 10bis] iii5 [structure uncertain] iv6 v10 [-1, before f. 31, with loss of text] vi-ix10 x10 [-1, before f. 76, with loss of text] xi-xiii10 xiv10 [-10, following f. 123, with loss of text]), horizontal catchwords, middle, lower margin, decorated in quires 1, 2, 6, 9, 12, and 13, see ff. 10v, 19, 45v, 75v, 104v, and 114v, no signatures, written below the top line, with the beginning of sections copied in a larger rounded southern gothic book hand, and the remainder of the commentary copied in a small, highly abbreviated cursive gothic script, in two columns of 35- to 31- lines (justification 115-112 x 95-90 mm.), frame ruled in lead, with the horizontal rules full across, and single full-length vertical bounding lines, no running titles, a few red rubrics, red paragraph marks delineate sections within the text, 6- to 4-line red initials, mostly undecorated, but with skillful violet pen decoration in quires 1-3, larger red initials, 15- to 12- line, at the beginning of major sections of the text, with decorative void spaces in the body of the initial, pen-infilling in black, ff.
    [Show full text]
  • First and Second Intentions in Paul of Venice
    First and Second Intentions in Paul of Venice Dr. Sara L. Uckelman Durham University [email protected] @SaraLUckelman Workshop on Double Intentionality 12 September 2019 Dr. Sara L. Uckelman Paul of Venice 12 Sep 19 1 / 26 Paul of Venice Born in Udine, 1369. Moved to Oxford, 1390. Lectured in Padua, 1408. Lectured in Siena, 1420. Lectured in Bologna, 1424. Professor at Siena, 1427. Rector of Siena, 1428. Died, 1429. Dr. Sara L. Uckelman Paul of Venice 12 Sep 19 2 / 26 The Logica Magna The treatise covers most of the topics discussed by medieval logicians. but [it] is definitely not a textbook [Venice, 1979, p. xviii]. Part I: On terms Part II: On propositions Focus today: On the treatise on terms (Part I, Fasc. 1). No other treatise is a more natural place for a treatment of intention. Dr. Sara L. Uckelman Paul of Venice 12 Sep 19 3 / 26 Categorematic vs. syncategorematic terms Terms: divided into categorematic and syncategorematic (“Pro quo primo notatur terminorum quidam sunt categorematici, quidam syncategorematici” [Venice, 1979, p. 2].) Definition (Categorematic terms) A categorematic term is a sign, inwardly as well as outwardly simple, in accordance with a common law, without any sort of unifying effect on subject and predicate, but leading per se to a conception of something other than itself and what is equiform to it [Venice, 1979, p. 3]. Terminus categorematicus est signum, tam implicite quam explicite simplex, de communi lege, non extremorum aliqualiter unitivum, sed alterius a se et suo consimili per se in notitiam deductivum [Venice, 1979, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Categories and Universals in the Later Middle Ages
    CATEGORIES AND UNIVERSALS IN THE LATER MIDDLE AGES Alessandro D. Conti In the (later) Middle Ages categories and universals were closely linked topics. Categorial doctrine concerned (1) the existence, inner natures, and the mutual relationships of the basic, metaphysical items of the world (individual and universal substances, individual and universal accidents), and (2) the connections of such basic items to language. Late medieval theories of universals1 dealt with the problems of (1) real existence of universals (or common natures), both substantial and accidental ones, and (2) the relationship between them and the (perceptible or otherwise intelligible) individuals. Hence, in one way, later medieval theories of universals investigated more thoroughly some of the many related questions which categorial doctrines went into. This is not surprising, since (1) textually, medieval discussions on the problem of universals derived from a well-known passage of Porphyry ’s Isagoge, a work which was intended to be an introduction to Aristotle’s Categories, and (2) philosophically, the medieval problem of universals is one of the various aspects of the problem of meaning, which in its turn is one of the two main subjects of any later medieval categorial doctrine. In Isagoge 1,13–16 Porphyry raises his famous series of questions, about the ontological status of universals and their relation to individuals, which medieval philosophers faced up to in their commentaries on the Isagoge and treatises on universals: (1) whether genera and species exist in themselves or are nothing but mere concepts; (2) whether, if they have an extramental form of existence, they are corporeal or incorporeal; (3) and whether they exist apart from perceptible objects or in and by virtue of them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rule of Contradictory Pairs, Insolubles and Validity
    Vivarium 58 (2020) 275-304 viva rium brill.com/viv The Rule of Contradictory Pairs, Insolubles and Validity Stephen Read University of St Andrews, St. Andrews, UK [email protected] Abstract The Oxford Calculator Roger Swyneshed put forward three provocative claims in his treatise on insolubles, written in the early 1330s, of which the second states that there is a formally valid inference with true premises and false conclusion. His example de- ployed the Liar paradox as the conclusion of the inference: ‘The conclusion of this inference is false, so this conclusion is false’. His account of insolubles supported his claim that the conclusion is false, and so the premise, referring to the conclusion, would seem to be true. But what is his account of validity that can allow true premises to lead to a false conclusion? This article considers Roger’s own account, as well as that of Paul of Venice, writing some sixty years later, whose account of the truth and false- hood of insolubles followed Roger’s closely. Paul endorsed Roger’s three claims. But their accounts of validity were different. The question is whether these accounts are coherent and support Paul’s claim in his Logica Magna that he endorsed all the normal rules of inference. Keywords contradiction – validity – signification – Aristotle – Roger Swyneshed – Paul of Venice © Stephen Read, 2020 | doi:10.1163/15685349-12341388 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license. 276 Read 1 The Rule of Contradictory Pairs In his treatise on insolubles, that is, the logical paradoxes, written in Oxford in the early 1330s, Roger Swyneshed, one of the Oxford Calculators, put forward three surprising, even paradoxical, claims:1 1.
    [Show full text]