The Third Certainty How and Why New York City's Property Taxes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Third Certainty How and Why New York City's Property Taxes Real Estate Forefront Emerging Developments in the NYC Marketplace, #22 The Third Certainty: How and Why New York City’s Property Taxes Increase Consistently Addressing The Many Misconceptions February 2013 Real estate investment services Real Estate Forefront: The Third Certainty: How and Why New York City’s Property Taxes 2 Increase Consistently Everyone knows the two certainties in life: death and taxes. In New York City, there is a third certainty which is that real property taxes increase every year regardless of market conditions. In fact, from 2009 to 2011 when the market value of all New York City properties declined, property tax collections increased by 17%. The data shows that since 1995 total billable assessed values have increased every year in every borough with the exception of the Bronx that showed a slight decline in 2010. While most would assume that wealthier neighborhoods would be assessed higher taxes, a close look at three neigh- borhoods shows that there is a wide disparity in property taxes paid within these neighborhoods, and there is no rule as to why some properties are taxed more than others. In short, this report aims to upend the reader’s preconceived notions on property taxes. The results of this study suggest that coop buildings do not necessarily have a favorable tax structure over rental buildings in some neighborhoods; townhouses are not always taxed lower than a coop; and the likelihood that property taxes will continue to increase every year is nearly a sure thing. Some of the specifi c fi ndings are as follows: — Real property tax collections have increased consistently from 2005 through 2012; however, the increase in tax collec- tions (56%) was in line with the net rate of increase in market values during this seven-year period (51%). — Of 111 buildings surveyed for this analysis on the Upper East Side, the Upper West Side and the West Village, coop buildings did not necessarily pay less in property taxes per square foot than rentals, despite the generally held percep- tion that they have been. — Real property taxes levied varied widely across and within the three neighborhoods reviewed. — Property taxes on single family homes were generally lower on a per-square-foot basis for buildings on the Upper West Side and West Village, but they were higher on the Upper East Side. — The overall market value of properties in the outer boroughs increased at a faster rate than in Manhattan from 2003 through 2009; however, the billable assessed values increased more in Manhattan during this period. These and other fi ndings discussed below demonstrate why property taxes generate so much controversy. As per Chairman and CEO Peter Hauspurg, “as a former tax lawyer, I am confounded by the City’s tax code. Researching these numbers was akin to a Law & Order episode: every new piece of information generated more and more questions.” Real property taxes increased over the last fi ve years on an aggregate level for a number of reasons, some more obvious than others. One could argue that, fi rst and foremost, property taxes increased because the City was adding new properties during those years, and as a result, was expanding the tax base. The chart below shows the new housing built in Manhattan alone from 2000 through this year and includes the housing expected through 2015. Browse listings at www.easternconsolidated.com Real estate investment services Real Estate Forefront: The Third Certainty: How and Why New York City’s Property Taxes 3 Increase Consistently New Housing Units in Manhattan 7,000 70,000 New Units in Manhattan 6,000 60,000 Cumulative Units 5,000 50,000 4,000 40,000 3,000 30,000 2,000 20,000 Units Cumulative New Units Per Year Per New Units 1,000 10,000 0 0 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 Source: Eastern Consolidated and CoStar As shown in the table below, all of the boroughs saw a signifi cant increase in housing stock, and as a result, an increase in its property tax base. New Housing Units From 2000 To 2010 2000 2010 Added Units Percentage Change New York City 3,200,912 3,371,062 170,150 5% Manhattan 798,144 847,090 48,946 6% Bronx 490,659 511,896 21,237 4% Brooklyn 930,866 1,000,293 69,427 7% Queens 817,250 835,127 17,877 2% Staten Island 163,993 176,656 12,663 8% Source: Census Bureau Market Values These added properties and expanded base would suggest that the overall market value1 of New York City properties has increased. The charts below show that, indeed, while the growth in Manhattan looks to dwarf the other boroughs, the outer boroughs actually experienced a much higher rate of market value growth from 2005 through 2008. In other words, property values on the existing building stock increased across the City. From 2008 through 2012, however, all four of the outer boroughs saw market values decline while Manhattan’s market value increased 22% during that time (brown line). 1 The New York City Department of Finance (DOF) determines the “market value” of a property using one of three approaches: the sales prices of comparable proper- ties sold that year, the net income based on rent revenue less operating expenses or on the cost to replace that property which is based on construction costs. Browse listings at www.easternconsolidated.com Real estate investment services Real Estate Forefront: The Third Certainty: How and Why New York City’s Property Taxes 4 Increase Consistently New York City Property Market Values Growth in Property Market Values By Borough By Borough 250% $300,000 Manhattan Manhattan Bronx Bronx $250,000 200% Brooklyn Brooklyn Queens Queens $200,000 150% Staten Island Staten Island $150,000 100% (in millions) $100,000 50% $50,000 0% $0 Percentage ChangeSince 1994 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 -50% 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 Source: Eastern Consolidated and NYC Department of Finance With its signifi cant offi ce, hotel, retail and wealthy residential base, Manhattan’s total market value has generally accounted for 32% of 38% of the overall New York City market value. The chart below, however, shows how New York City’s overall market value (yellow line) stayed fl at from 2008 through 2012 largely because of the outer boroughs. New York City Historic Market, Actual And Billable Assessed Property Values $180,000 900,000 $150,000 750,000 $120,000 600,000 $90,000 450,000 Taxable Actual Assessed Value Taxable Billable Assessed Value $60,000 300,000 Market Value (right axis) $30,000 150,000 NYCTotal Property Value (in millions) $0 0 Source: Eastern Consolidated and NYC Department of Finance Browse listings at www.easternconsolidated.com Real estate investment services Real Estate Forefront: The Third Certainty: How and Why New York City’s Property Taxes 5 Increase Consistently Assessed Values The chart above clearly shows how assessed values2 (brown line) increased steadily during these years. More specifi cally, in 2010, the overall market value for New York City properties declined by 1.9% over 2009, but the total assessed3 value increased by 3.9% that year. In other words, the other reason why property taxes increased most years is because assessed values increased these years. By law4, the City’s Department of Finance (DOF), which is empowered to make property assessments, cannot raise as- sessed values or property taxes beyond a certain rate per year; therefore, they phase assessed increases over a period of fi ve years. For commercial buildings or residential buildings with 11 or more units, the DOF adjusts the assessment (down- ward) even further to calculate the “transitional” assessed value. This transitional value often becomes the billable taxable assessed value5 on which the tax rate is applied. For residential properties with fewer than 11 units, the tax rate is applied to the actual assessed value. Because transitional assessed values are often lower than actual assessed values, the taxable billable value line (orange) in the chart above is smoother and fl atter than the assessed value line. In short, because these phased-in increases are carried out over fi ve years, billable values increased from 2008 through 2012 even though market values declined. While this stabilization policy eases the tax burden in the frothy years, it adds to the tax burden when property values start to decline which is why the property taxes collected increased from 2008 to 2012. The lines below show how taxable values increased for most boroughs when overall market values did not6. 2 The DOF then determines the “assessed value” based on a set percentage of market value, called the “level of assessment or assessment ratio,” which is 6% for Class 1 buildings and 45% for tax classes 2, 3 and 4 as per the DOF website. However, the data below suggests that the assessment ratio can be much lower for Class 1 buildings. 3 The NYC DOF mails property owners a Notice of Property Value (NOPV) once a year that includes information about both the property’s market and assessed values which are used to calculate property taxes for that tax year. According to the DOF, “assessed values cannot go up by more than a certain rate per year and over a fi ve year period (depending on the building class) unless there was new construction or renovations took place. Therefore, it may take several years for the assessed value to adjust to a large increase in market value.” This explains why assessments go up even when market value goes down. 4 Assessed Value (AV) cannot increase more than 6 percent each year or more than 20 percent in fi ve years.
Recommended publications
  • MICHELIN Guide New York City 2020 Starred Establishments
    MICHELIN Guide New York City 2020 Starred establishments Three-Star restaurants Exceptional cuisine, worth a special journey ESTABLISHMENT AREA SUB AREA NEW Chef Chef's Table at Brooklyn Fare Manhattan Midtown West César Ramirez Gramercy, Flatiron & Union Eleven Madison Park Manhattan Square Daniel Humm Le Bernardin Manhattan Midtown West Eric Ripert Masa Masa Manhattan Midtown West Takayama Per Se Manhattan Midtown West Thomas Keller Two-Star restaurants Excellent cuisine, worth a detour ESTABLISHMENT AREA SUB AREA NEW Aquavit Manhattan Midtown East Aska Brooklyn Williamsburg Atera Manhattan TriBeCa Gramercy, Flatiron & Union Atomix Manhattan Square NEW Blanca Brooklyn Fort Greene & Bushwick Blue Hill at Stone Barns Westchester NEW Daniel Manhattan Upper East Side Gabriel Kreuther Manhattan Midtown West Ichimura at Uchū Manhattan Lower East Side Jean-Georges Manhattan Upper West Side Jungsik Manhattan TriBeCa Ko Manhattan East Village L’Atelier de Joël Robuchon Manhattan Chelsea Modern (The) Manhattan Midtown West One-Star restaurants High quality cooking, worth a stop ESTABLISHMENT AREA SUB AREA NEW Agern Manhattan Midtown East Ai Fiori Manhattan Midtown West Gramercy, Flatiron & Union Aldea Manhattan Square Bar Uchū Manhattan Lower East Side Bâtard Manhattan TriBeCa Gramercy, Flatiron & Union Benno Manhattan Square NEW Blue Hill Manhattan Greenwich & West Village Gramercy, Flatiron & Union Bouley at Home Manhattan Square Carbone Manhattan Greenwich & West Village Casa Enríque Queens Gramercy, Flatiron & Union Casa Mono Manhattan Square
    [Show full text]
  • Manhattan New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Projects 4Q20
    Manhattan New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Projects 4Q20 83 85 82 12 41 62 ID PROPERTY UNITS 6 30 Morningside Drive 205 Total Lease Up 205 12 HAP Seven NY 129 15 418 West 126th Street 75 19 Victoria Theatre 191 15 Total Under Construction 395 19 37 Broadway Development 130 6 41 210 Wadsworth Avenue 98 46 Total Planned 228 43 96th Street 171 43 46 Frederick Douglass Blvd 100 37 62 4037 Broadway 132 82 The Heights on Broadway 171 83 Sherman Plaza 272 85 3875 9th Avenue 614 Total Prospective 1,460 2000 ft Source: Yardi Matrix LEGEND Lease-Up Under Construction Planned Prospective Manhattan New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Projects 4Q20 44 73 ID PROPERTY UNITS 1 The Smile 233 3 Convivium 140 45 4 Sixty 125 141 4 39 23 26 5 Two Waterline Square 435 Total Lease Up 949 1 74 13 75 10 Sendero Verde Phase II 361 22 24 13 One East Harlem 404 25 Total Under Construction 765 49 22 15 West 118th Street 51 38 23 1971 Madison Avenue 93 10 24 72 East 120th Street 218 77 25 77 East 118th Street 202 47 26 East 127th Street 152 38 La Hermosa Tower 160 39 2031-2033 5th Avenue 240 Total Planned 1,116 48 44 58 West 135th Street 100 45 64-74 West 125th Street 200 47 1987-1991 3rd Avenue 59 76 48 1988-1996 2nd Avenue 185 49 248 East 120th Street 86 50 308 East 86th Street 68 78 52 Lenox Hill Hospital 200 73 Lenox Terrace Phase II 1,642 74 1800 Park Avenue 670 50 75 2460 2nd Avenue 730 3 76 321 East 96th Street 1,100 77 East River Plaza 1,100 52 5 78 Holmes Towers NextGen Development 339 Total Prospective 6,479 1000 ft Source: Yardi Matrix LEGEND
    [Show full text]
  • View from the Street Neighborhood Overview: Manhattan
    EASTERN CONSOLIDATED VIEW FROM THE STREET NEIGHBORHOOD OVERVIEW: MANHATTAN APRIL 2017 EASTERN CONSOLIDATED www.easternconsolidated.com VIEW FROM THE STREET NEIGHBORHOOD OVERVIEW: MANHATTAN OVERVIEW Dear Friends: Of the international investors, Chinese While asking rents for retail space on firms increased their acquisitions of major Manhattan corridors such as Fifth We are pleased to introduce the Manhattan properties to $6.5 billion in Avenue, Madison Avenue, East 57th inaugural issue of View from the Street, 2016, up from $4.7 billion in 2015. The Street, West 34th Street, and Times Eastern Consolidated’s research report most significant transactions included Square can reach up to $4,500 per on neighborhoods in core Manhattan, China Life’s investment in 1285 Avenue square foot, our analysis shows that which will provide you with a snapshot of the Americas, which traded for there are dozens of blocks in prime of recent investment property sales, $1.65 billion in May 2016, and China neighborhoods where entrepreneurial average residential rents, and average Investment Corporation’s investment in retailers can and do rent retail space for retail rents. 1221 Avenue of the Americas, in which under $200 per square foot. partial interest traded for $1.03 billion in As is historically the case in Manhattan, December 2016. Our review of residential rents shows neighborhoods with significant office that asking rents for two-bedroom buildings such as Midtown West, Investor interest in cash-flowing multifamily apartments are ranging from a low of Midtown East, and Nomad/Flatiron properties remained steady throughout $3,727 on the Lower East Side up to recorded the highest dollar volume 2016, with nearly 60 percent of these $9,370 in Tribeca.
    [Show full text]
  • RESIDENTIAL MARKET REPORT October 10Th – November 9Th
    RESIDENTIAL MARKET REPORT October 10th – November 9th Manhattan Discount % Discount % CASH OR ORIGINAL LAST LISTING PURCHASE NIEGHBORHOOD DEAL TYPE Original & Listing & FINANCING PRICE PRICE PRICE Purchase Purchase Battery Park Condo Contingent $475,000.00 $475,000 $445,000 6.3% 6.3% Non- Battery Park Condo $790,000.00 $749,000 $745,000 5.7% 0.5% Contingent Bowery Co Op All Cash $1,595,000.00 $1,595,000 $1,500,000 6.0% 6.0% Chelsea Co Op Contingent $1,695,000 $1,595,000.00 $1,550,000 8.6% 2.8% Chelsea Co Op Contingent $1,999,999.00 $1,999,999 $1,750,000 12.5% 12.5% East Village Co Op Contingent $875,000.00 $840,000.00 $800,000.00 8.6% 4.8% East Village Condo Contingent $1,525,000.00 $1,425,000 $1,400,000 8.2% 1.8% East Village Condo Contingent $2,295,000.00 $2,295,000 $2,150,000 6.3% 6.3% Financial District Co Op All Cash $999,000.00 $999,000 $950,000 4.9% 4.9% Financial District New Dev Contingent $1,325,000.00 $1,325,000 $1,325,000 0.0% 0.0% Financial District Condo Contingent $875,000.00 $799,000 $762,500 12.9% 4.6% Flat Iron Condo Contingent $2,099,000 $2,099,000.00 $1,965,000 6.4% 6.4% Flat Iron Co Op Contingent $1,045,000 $999,000.00 $935,000 10.5% 6.4% Flat Iron Co Op Contingent $1,850,000.00 $1,850,000 $1,873,125 -1.3% -1.3% Flat Iron Co Op Contingent $1,395,000.00 $1,395,000 $1,325,000 5.0% 5.0% PAGE 1 RESIDENTIAL MARKET REPORT October 10th – November 9th Manhattan Discount % Discount % CASH OR ORIGINAL LAST LISTING PURCHASE NIEGHBORHOOD DEAL TYPE Original & Listing & FINANCING PRICE PRICE PRICE Purchase Purchase Gramercy Co Op
    [Show full text]
  • WEST VILLAGE Durham, NC
    WEST VILLAGE Durham, NC West Village includes 10 preserved and recently restored historic buildings and a new 7-story parking structure in the warehouse district of downtown Durham. Renovations include new energy-saving technologies such as: Storm water management / recycling Green roof studies Insulated glass windows & roofing LEED compliant common area finishes The combination of history, design and location found at West Village make it a truly unique place to live, work and play. DEMOGRAPHICS 1-MILE 3-MILES 5-MILES Population 14,760 85,793 169,090 Projected 5-Year Growth 4.22% 2.52% 6.83% Estimated HH 5,545 32,920 67,202 Avg HH Income $46,144 $45,166 $53,030 For more information, contact: Matt Winters ■ (919) 281.2319 ■ [email protected] Tonya Mills■ (919) 281.2307 ■ [email protected] All information provided herin is from sources deemed reliable. However, all information is subject to verification. Tri Properties does not independently verify nor warrant the accuracy of the information WEST VILLAGE Durham, NC 5 FENWAY STREET WEST VILLAGE PHASE I 3 1 Cooper Shop 2 Flowers House 2 3 Hicks Warehouse 4 Toms Warehouse D 4 U 1 5 Power House K E S MORGAN STREET T R E E PHASE II T 8 6 O’Brien Warehouse 7 Cobb Warehouse 7 6 Parking Garage 8 Fuller Street Garage - 9 9 Main Street Office 10 Old Cigarette Factor PEABODY STREET 11 Walker Warehouse MAIN STREET 11 For more information, contact: 10 Matt Winters ■ (919) 281.2319 ■ [email protected] AMTRAK Tonya Mills■ (919) 281.2307 ■ [email protected] PETTIGREW STREET PLATFORM All information provided herin is from sources deemed reliable.
    [Show full text]
  • The Far West Village and Greenwich Village Waterfront
    The Far West Village and Greenwich Village Waterfront: A Proposal for Preservation to the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission September, 2004 Submitted by the Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation 232 East 11th Street New York, NY 10003 212/475-9585 www.gvshp.org The Far West Village and Greenwich Village Waterfront: Proposal to the Landmarks Preservation Commission Introduction The Far West Village, located along the Hudson River waterfront between Horatio and Barrow Streets, is where Greenwich Village began, home to its earliest European settlements. Within its dozen or so blocks can be found a treasure trove of historic buildings and resources spanning about a hundred years and a broad range of styles and building types. However, the district’s character is united by several overarching commonalities and punctuated by several distinctive features that define its unique significance, including: its role as a unique intact record of the only mixed maritime/industrial and residential neighborhood along the Hudson River waterfront; its unusually large collection of several maritime, industrial, and residential building types not found elsewhere; its collection of several buildings which were pioneering instances of adaptive re-use of industrial buildings for residential purposes; its numerous key industrial complexes which shaped New York City’s development; the particular buildings and streets within its boundaries which served as a record of several important moments in the history of industry, shipping, and New York City; and several exceptional buildings which are noteworthy due to their age, unique composition, early manifestation of a subsequently common building type, or historical and architectural significance.
    [Show full text]
  • NL March 2010
    The Park West Tenant Vol. 35, No. 3 The Newsletter of the Park West Village Tenants’ Association [email protected] March 2010 PWVTA Support for Federal Lawsuit NYC Tenant Organizations In 2008, one of our fellow tenants filed a lawsuit in GROUPS THAT HELP US federal court claiming that the development of the Tenants & Neighbors (T&N), the Metropolitan five new luxury towers and over 300,000 square Council on Housing (Met Council), and Housing feet of mall space, now known as Columbus Here and Now (HHN) are New York City’s major Square, was and is unlawful. tenant action groups. The PWVTA is active in The suit also claims that rents being charged each and has been very supportive of them all. in the new buildings, and for many apartments NYSTNC (New York State Tenants & Neighbors in the existing Park West Village (PWV) buildings, Coalition) is T&N’s statewide organization. are at least two-to-three times their lawful levels. Met Council and T&N were created to assist To educate newer tenants about the history individual tenants who had landlord problems, of PWV and to refresh the memory of long- and each has grown into broader roles. Both time tenants, PWV was developed in the 1950s organizations are strong tenant advocates that pursuant to a federally funded urban renewal often work together, and are generally effective program involving the combined efforts of the on our behalf. federal government, New York City (NYC) and Met Council still works mainly on tenant/landlord private enterprise. Under the Housing Act of issues for individuals and entire buildings, and helps 1949, Title 1 grants were made to local governments HELPFUL GROUPS continued on page 3 to redevelop blighted areas as quality, affordable and low-density residential communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Manhattan Neighborhoods
    NEIGHBORHOODS DOWNTOWN. Downtown Manhattan Below 14th Street Little Germany (historic) 7th to 10th Streets; Avenues A to B Alphabet City and Loisaida Houston to 14th Streets; FDR Drive to Avenue A East Village Houston to 14th Streets; the East River to the Bowery Greenwich Village Houston to 14th Streets; Broadway to the Hudson River NoHo Houston Street to Astor Place; the Bowery to Broadway Bowery Canal to 4th Streets; the Bowery West Village Houston to 14th Streets; 6th Avenue (or 7th Avenue) to the Hudson River Lower East Side Canal to Houston Streets; the East River to the Bowery SoHo Canal to Houston Streets; Lafayette to Varick Streets Nolita Broome to Houston Streets; the Bowery to Lafayette Street Little Italy Mulberry Street from Canal to Broome Streets Chinatown Chambers to Delancey Streets; East Broadway to Broadway Financial District Below Chambers Street Five Points (historic) Worth and Baxter Streets Cooperative Village Frankfort to Grand Streets; FDR Drive to East Broadway Two Bridges Brooklyn Bridge to Montgomery Street; St. James Place to the East River Tribeca Vesey Street to Canal Street; Broadway to the Hudson River Civic Center Vesey to Chambers Streets; the East River to Broadway Radio Row (historic) Greenwich Street from Cortlandt to Dey Streets (World Trade Center site) South Street Seaport South of Fulton Street and along the FDR Drive Battery Park City West of West Street Little Syria (historic) Washington Street from Battery Park to above Rector Street BETWEEN DOWNTOWN AND MIDTOWN. Flower District 26th to 28th
    [Show full text]
  • (530) 759-0661 Solatwestvillage.Com Notice of Move In
    Notice of Move In – Important Information Dear Resident: Your move in day is approaching and we need to be sure that you are aware of everything that will be happening on that day! Move-in day can be hectic so we want to try and take away as much stress as possible. We offer Fast Pass move-in options for your convenience. In order to qualify for this option, you must have a completed file and must make sure that your initial monthly installment/other charges are paid at least 2 weeks prior to move-in. Should you not qualify for a fast pass, you will likely have to wait in line to complete the check-in process to receive keys. • For details about the move-in schedule, please refer to the Move-In Procedures. • Completed files include the following as applicable: o Proof of utilities (power/water) being placed into resident name, if applicable. Please refer to the Utility Info Document for specifics steps you will need to take. o We also require that all residents have liability insurance coverage. Please review Insurance Coverage Information for detail on how you can satisfy this requirement. o Monthly installments may be paid online through our Resident portal with an echeck, eMoney Order, or a debit/credit card (fees apply). Please view info about our Mobile App. You may also pay via check in the office or via mail. o Animal Registration – all residents must complete the pet profile even if you do not have a pet. Please review the Pet Screening Flyer .
    [Show full text]
  • Hudson Stst West Village 585 HUDSON ST New York, NY
    585585 HudsonHudson StSt West Village 585 HUDSON ST New York, NY Ground Floor Approximately 14,600 square feet on 2 levels with 100 feet of frontage situated between Meatpacking, Bleecker Street and one of Manhattan’s most affluent BANK ST neighborhoods, the West Village. BETHUNE ST CELLAR 54' 10'-11 7/8" HIGHLIGHTS: PREMISES: 22'-2 7/16" CELLAR RETAIL 2 1,735.30 SF 1,735.30 SF Ground : +/- 6,600 SF • Prime West Village retail opportunity 25'-0 1/2" RESIDENTIAL Lower Level: +/- 8,000 SF ACCESSORY HUDSON ST2'-0 1/16" 4'-8" 4'-6 13/16" • Entire block of frontage from Bethune to Bank Streets on Hudson 4'-9 1/16" 44'-3 1/4" SOUTHWEST STAIRS 137.77 SF N CELLAR RETAIL 2 LEASE PLAN - 1,735.30 SF NL 7.70 SF SCALE: 7/64" = 1'-0" ELEVATOR CEILING HEIGHTS: • Available for a number of uses including fitness,69.76 SF medical, Lower Level Ground : 10’6” banks, and home furnishings CELLAR RETAIL 1 Lower Level: 10’ 8,021.01 SF NORTHEAST STAIRS 184.94 SF STAIR • Excellent signage and branding at the north end of the A CONVEYOR 74.50 SF West Village N POSSESSION: KEY PLAN BANK ST Immediate • Close proximity to The High Line, Chelsea Market,NTS The MEASURED DRAWINGS THESE DRAWINGS APPLY IN THE CONTEXT OF PROJECTS THAT INVOLVE ALREADY EXISTING BUILDINGS. THEY ARE PREPARED DURING THE PROCESS OF UNDERTAKING A RENOVATION OR BETHUNE ST DOCUMENTATION OF AN ALREADY EXISTING BUILDING. THEY ARE DERIVED FROM THE MEASUREMENTS TAKEN OF A STANDING BUILDING.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Market Report
    RESIDENTIAL MARKET REPORT September 8th – October 9th Manhattan Discount % Discount % CASH OR ORIGINAL LAST LISTING PURCHASE NIEGHBORHOOD DEAL TYPE Original & Listing & FINANCING PRICE PRICE PRICE Purchase Purchase Battery Park Condo Contingent $519,000.00 $550,000 $545,000 -5.0% 0.9% Battery Park Condo Contingent $456,800.00 $456,800 $434,000 5.0% 5.0% Non- Battery Park Condo $850,000.00 $799,000 $780,000 8.2% 2.4% Contingent Battery Park Condo Contingent $550,000.00 $525,000 $525,000 4.5% 0.0% Battery Park Condo All Cash $725,000.00 $725,000 $642,500 11.4% 11.4% Chelsea Condo Contingent $1,850,000.00 $1,850,000 $1,787,000 3.4% 3.4% Chelsea Coop Contingent $1,200,000 $1,100,000.00 $950,000 20.8% 13.6% Non- East Village Condo $1,750,000.00 $1,750,000 $1,750,000 0.0% 0.0% Contingent East Village Coop Contingent $425,000.00 $425,000 $412,000 3.1% 3.1% East Village Coop Contingent $1,095,000 $1,095,000.00 $1,115,000 -1.8% -1.8% Gramercy Park Coop Contingent $1,250,000.00 $1,195,000 $1,170,000 6.4% 2.1% Gramercy Park Condo All Cash $1,250,000 $1,250,000.00 $1,200,000 4.0% 4.0% Greenwich Village Coop All Cash $1,950,000.00 $1,950,000 $1,800,000 7.7% 7.7% Greenwich Village Coop Contingent $1,600,000.00 $1,450,000 $1,350,000 15.6% 6.9% Greenwich Village Coop Contingent $1,495,000 $1,375,000.00 $1,257,500 15.9% 8.5% PAGE 1 RESIDENTIAL MARKET REPORT September 8th – October 9th Manhattan Discount % Discount % CASH OR ORIGINAL LAST LISTING PURCHASE NIEGHBORHOOD DEAL TYPE Original & Listing & FINANCING PRICE PRICE PRICE Purchase Purchase Non- Greenwich
    [Show full text]
  • Park West Village History of a Diverse Community
    ============================================================================= RNA History Club Session 30 May 19, 2019 ============================================================================= Park West Village History of a diverse community I. Background: The Old Community and Manhattantown A group of UWS residents who grew up in the 1930s, 1940s and 1950s in the poor and moderate income communities on West 98th and 99th Streets between Columbus Avenue and Central Park West met annually for maybe 50 years. They affectionately called it the "Old Community." In 1952, however, the community was threatened by something more destructive to it than had been the Great Depression and two world wars. Title I of the US Federal Housing Act of 1949 set in motion the obliteration of the neighborhood. Robert Moses, in his position as chairman of the New York City Slum Clearance Committee, condemned the area, largely on the basis of median household income but not because of any slum like conditions. He designated the site from 97th to 100th Streets between Amsterdam Ave and CPW as the first Title I project of the Federal Housing Commission. Moses wielded his power to condemn six square blocks of this remarkable neighborhood, containing 338 apartment buildings and 3,628 families. The total appraised value of this property was $15 million, but the “reasonable bid” Moses accepted for its “renewal” was just $1 million, from a company run by Samuel Caspert, a corrupt Democratic Party operative, who promised to build a wonderful new housing complex, dubbed Manhattantown in five years. Caspert and his partners would build nothing at Manhattantown beyond a parking lot, and they did not even demolish all that much.
    [Show full text]