The Thailand Natural History Museum Journal 5(2): 125-132, December 2011. © 2011 by National Science Museum, Thailand

First Record of Lygosoma angeli (Smith, 1937) (Reptilia: : Scincidae) in Thailand with Notes on Other Specimens from Laos

Michael Cota*1, Peter Geissler 2, Tanya Chan-ard 1and Sunchai Makchai 1

1 Natural History Museum, National Science Museum, Thailand, Technopolis, Khlong 5, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani 12120 Thailand 2 Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, Bonn, D-53113 Germany

ABSTRACT: The lygosomine , Lygosoma angeli, is added to the herpetofauna of Thailand based on material from the collection of the Natural History Museum. New geographical and morphological data on Lao specimens of L. angeli are also provided.

KEY WORDS: Lygosoma angeli, Scincidae, geographic distribution, new record, Thailand.

INTRODUCTION confirmed as belonging to that , while the other three Lygosoma angeli was first appeared morphologically distinct described from Vietnam by Malcolm from L. isodactylum. Smith (1937). It was only known from this country until recently in the MATERIALS AND METHODS past decade. More recent discoveries show that this species also occurs in One specimen was from Khao Laos. So far in total, only nine Soi Dao Wildlife Sanctuary specimens were known to science Chantaburi Province, Eastern (Teynié et al., 2004; Geissler et al., Thailand: THNHM 07070. This 2011). specimen was collected by Tanya Chan-ard in 1988. Two specimens Early in 2011, a request came were collected from Xe Paine, in for specimen pictures of Lygosoma Champasak, Laos: THNHM 11298 isodactylum from the Zoologisches and THNHM 11299. Specimens were Forschungsmuseum Alexander collected by Tanya Chan-ard on 10 Koenig, Bonn, Germany. At the time, Feburary 1997. Morphological data there were four lygosomine in were taken from THNHM 11298 and the Natural History Museum, THNHM 07070, but not from National Science Museum, Thailand THNHM 11299. Because of the (THNHM) collection classified as damaged state of specimen THNHM Lygosoma isodactylum. One was 11299, it was feared that close ______*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

126 The Thailand Natural History Museum Journal 5(2), December 2011 ______examination and taking of all the specimens extend the morphological measurements and others variation known for this species, as morphological data would have could be expected from examination resulted in further damage or of new specimens, especially from a destruction of the specimen. It was population found so far from the clear from physical appearance, previously known range. colour and pattern of the specimen that it was the same species as In particular, the forelimb THNHM 11298. length, measured from axilla to palm was significantly shorter in THNHM Comparative morphological 07070 than values for the other data between Lygosoma angeli and specimens previously collected, even Lygosoma isodactylum (Geissler et though its snout-vent length is large. al., 2011) are shown in Table 1. Measurements were made with a dial The head widths of THNHM caliper and are given in millimetres. 11298 and THNHM 07070 were Scale counts were made under an wider than the values previously Olympus stereo microscope and from measured for the species. This could pictures made from an Olympus possibly be due to flattening C7070WZ with an Olympus stereo compression in THNHM 07070, but microscope. not in THNHM 11298.

RESULTS The tympanum in THNHM 07070 is partly covered with scales, Based on comparisons of the but still visible (Figure 3). It is morphological data (Table 1; Figures possible that this is due to flattening 1-4), THNHM 11298 and THNHM compression of the specimen during 07070 were classified as Lygosoma preservation. angeli. The data could be taken from THNHM 11299 also fit into the Up to the time of this morphological variation known for publication, all Lygosoma angeli Lygosoma angeli; however, since specimens examined had 30 mid- data was incomplete, it is not body scale rows. THNHM 11298, included in Table 1. All three from Champasak, Laos, has only 28 specimens showed the characteristic mid-body scale rows. This same colour pattern, each light brown body specimen only had 5 infralabials and scale bearing a basal black blotch; 6 supralabials. THNHM 11299, however, THNHM 07070 shows a which was not included in the table, significantly darker ground showed values within those expected colouration, probably due to its for Lygosoma angeli. preservation state. These new

Cota et al. - First Record of Lygosoma angeli in Thailand 127 ______

Figure 1. Lygosoma angeli (THNHM 07070 Khao Soi Dao Wildlife Sanctuary, Chantaburi Province, Thailand): dorsal view of head.

Figure 2. Lygosoma angeli (THNHM 11298 Xe Paine, Champasak, Laos): dorsal view of head. There was some staining done for scale counts.

128 The Thailand Natural History Museum Journal 5(2), December 2011 ______

Figure 3. Lygosoma angeli (THNHM 07070, Khao Soi Dao Wildlife Sanctuary, Chantaburi Province, Thailand): lateral view of head, stained for scale counts. Fibers are from an attempt to clean the specimen.

Figure 4. Lygosoma angeli (THNHM 11298, Xe Paine, Champasak, Laos): lateral view of head.

Cota et al. - First Record of Lygosoma angeli in Thailand 129 ______

Table 1. Morphological comparison between Lygosoma angeli and L. isodactylum (data from Geissler et al., 2011 and our new specimens).

Lygosoma Lygosoma angeli isodactylum THNHM 11298 THNHM 07070 Sample size n = 6 * Snout-vent- 77.5-112.3 length ( 97.3 ± 12.6) 82.5-117.0 95.5 101.0

Tail length 55.4-86.3 (67.9 ± (* generated) 14.0, n=4) 66.0-93 57.8 80.0 Trunk length (from Axilla to 55.8-85.4 (71.7 ± groin) 10.7) 58.0 76.6 73.9 9.4-12.1 (10.5 ± Headlength 1.0) 11.7-14.0 10.2 9.0

Headwidth 4.8-6.2 (5.6 ± 0.5) 7.7-9.0 6.5 6.5 Snout to 15.9-21.4 (18.5 ± forelimb 2.2) 20.0 18.4 20.0 Snout length (snout to posterior angle of mouth) 3.2-3.7 (3.5 ± 0.2 4.3 4.6 Snout to 8.3-10.2 (9.4 ± tympanum 0.8) 10.3 10.2 Not Visible Forelimb length (axilla to palm) 4.3-5.5 (4.9 ± 0.4) 11.5 5.5 4.0 Hindlimb length (groin to palm) 6.4-8.4 (7.4 ± 0.7) 12.4-15.5 7.6 7.9 Prefrontals in contact no no no no Supraoculars 4 4 4 4

Frontoparietal(s) 1 1 1 1 Parietals in contact posteriorly yes yes yes yes

Scales bordering parietals posteriorly 9-10 10 9 Nuchals 0 0 0 0 Supranasals in contact yes no yes yes Supranasals fused with nasals no Anterior no no

Loreals 2 1 2 2

130 The Thailand Natural History Museum Journal 5(2), December 2011 ______

Table 1. Morphological comparison between Lygosoma angeli and L. isodactylum (data from Geissler et al., 2011 and our new specimens) (continued).

Lygosoma Lygosoma angeli isodactylum THNHM 11298 THNHM 07070 Sample size n = 6 * Preocular 2 2 2 2 Supraciliaries 5-6 7 5 5 Supralabials 7 7 6 7 Lower eyelid scaly scaly scaly scaly Infralabials 6-7 6 7 Pairs of chin shields 2 3 2 4 First pair of chin shields in contact medially yes yes yes yes Second pair seperated by n scales 1 1 1 0 Third pair seperated by n scales 3 3 0 Chin shields in contact with infralabials yes no yes yes Midbody scale rows 30 30-34 28 30 Paravertebral scales 107-115 88-98 109 108 Ventrals in transerve rows 112-123 113 121 Enlarged precloacals 6 6 6 6 Subdigital lamellae on fourth finger 5 5 5 Subdigital lamellae on fourth toe 6-7 7-10 5 7

Cota et al. - First Record of Lygosoma angeli in Thailand 131 ______

Figure 5. Map of all known Lygosoma angeli localities taken from Geissler et al. (2011) (in blue) and this study (in red).

DISCUSSION (L. angeli, L. anguinum, L. bowringii, L. corpulentum, L. haroldyoungi, L. The recent finding of these herbeti, L. isodactylum, L. koratense three specimens of Lygosoma angeli and L. quadrupes) are known to in the herpetological collection of the occur in Thailand (Nabhitabhata et THNHM shows that the knowledge al., 2004; Nabhitabhata & Chan-ard, about the real distribution pattern of 2005). Like the record of Lygosoma these secretive skinks in Southeast corpulentum Smith, 1921 from the Asia is still preliminary. Including L. same locality in Eastern Thailand angeli, currently nine species of (Nabhitabhata & Chan-ard, 2005), Lygosoma Hardwicke & Gray, 1827 the presence of L. angeli underscores 132 The Thailand Natural History Museum Journal 5(2), December 2011 ______that many taxa, thought to be 2011. A review of endemic to Indochina, may also be Indochinese skinks of the present in Eastern Thailand. This Lygosoma Hardwicke supports the hypothesis that the & Gray, 1827 (Squamata: Mekong, in fact, does not form a Scincidae), with natural biogeographical border for the history notes and an lowland herpetofauna in mainland identification key. Biologia Southeast Asia (Bain & Hurley, 66(6): 1159-1176. 2011). The short distance between Nabhitabhata, J. and T. Chan-ard. the new locality and the Cambodian 2005. Thailand Red Data: border reinforces the hypothesis that Mammals, and the species must also be distributed in Amphibians. Office of Cambodia, as it was supposed by Environmental Policy and Geissler et al. (2011). Planning, Bangkok, 182 pp. Nabhitabhata, J., Chan-ard, T. and Y. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Chuaynkern. '2000' 2004. Checklist of amphibians and We thank Wolfgang Böhme, reptiles in Thailand. Office of Zoologisches Forschungs-museum Environmental Policy and Alexander Koenig (ZFMK), Bonn for Planning, Bangkok, 152 pp. his assistance in the determination of Smith, M.A. 1937. Un nouveau the Lygosoma specimens. Lézard de Cochinchine. Bulletin du Muséum National REFERENCES d’Histoire Naturelle (2), 9(6): 366. Bain, R.H. and M.M. Hurley. 2011. Teynié, A., P. David, A. Ohler and K. A biogeographic syntheses of Luanglath. 2004. Notes on a the amphibians and reptiles of collection of amphibians and Indochina. Bulletin of the reptiles from southern Laos, American Museum of Natural with a discussion of the History 360: 1-138. occurrence of Indo-Malayan Geissler, P., T.Q. Nguyen, T.M. species. Hamadryad 29(1): Phung, R. W. Van Devender, 33-62. T. Hartmann, Balázs, Farkas, T. Ziegler and W. Böhme.