Radiative Forcing of the Stratosphere of Jupiter, Part I: Atmospheric
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
*(Revised) Manuscript, clean version Click here to download (Revised) Manuscript, clean version: Manuscript.pdf Click here to view linked References 1 2 3 4 5 Radiative Forcing of the Stratosphere of Jupiter, Part I: 6 7 Atmospheric Cooling Rates from Voyager to Cassini 8 9 10 a, b a c d e 11 X. Zhang *, C.A. Nixon , R.L. Shia , R.A. West , P.G. J. Irwin , R.V. Yelle , M.A. 12 a,c a 13 Allen , Y.L. Yung 14 15 16 17 18 a Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, 19 20 Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA 21 b 22 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA 23 c 24 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, 25 Pasadena, CA 91109, USA 26 d 27 Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Planetary Physics, University of Oxford, Clarendon 28 29 Laboratory, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PU,UK 30 e 31 Department of Planetary Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA 32 33 34 35 36 *Corresponding author at: Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California 37 38 Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA. 39 40 E-mail address: [email protected] (X. Zhang) 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 Submitted to: 48 49 Plan. Space Sci. (PSS) Special issue on Outer planets systems 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 1 64 65 1 2 3 4 Abstract 5 6 7 8 We developed a line-by-line heating and cooling rate model for the stratosphere of 9 10 Jupiter, based on two complete sets of global maps of temperature, C2H2 and C2H6, 11 12 retrieved from the Cassini and Voyager observations in the latitude and vertical plane, 13 with a careful error analysis. The non-LTE effect is found unimportant on the thermal 14 15 cooling rate below 0.01 mbar. The most important coolants are molecular hydrogen 16 17 between 10 and 100 mbar, and hydrocarbons, including ethane (C2H6), acetylene (C2H2) 18 19 and methane (CH4), in the region above. The two-dimensional cooling rate maps are 20 21 influenced primarily by the temperature structure, and also by the meridional 22 23 distributions of C2H2 and C2H6. The ‘quasi-quadrennial oscillation’ (QQO)-type thermal 24 structure at the 1 mbar level in the Cassini data and the strong C H latitudinal contrast in 25 2 6 26 the Voyager era are the two most prominent features influencing the cooling rate patterns. 27 28 The globally averaged CH4 heating and cooling rates are not balanced, clearly in the 29 30 lower stratosphere under 10 mbar, and possibly in the upper stratosphere above 1 mbar. 31 32 Possible heating sources from the gravity wave breaking and aerosols are discussed. The 33 34 radiative relaxation timescale in the lower stratosphere implies that the temperature 35 profile might not be purely radiatively controlled. 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 2 64 65 1 2 3 4 1. Introduction 5 6 7 8 The stratosphere of Jupiter is expected to be in radiative equilibrium due to the inhibition 9 10 of strong vertical motion by the stratospheric temperature inversion above the tropopause 11 12 (~100 mbar) and the approximate isotherm above ~5 mbar (Moses et al., 2004). Although 13 the major constituents in the atmosphere are hydrogen and helium, the stratospheric 14 15 radiative budget is mainly controlled by trace amounts of hydrocarbons, including ~0.2% 16 17 methane (CH4) and its photochemical products, acetylene (C2H2) and ethane (C2H6), and 18 19 aerosols. Previous studies (e.g., Wallace et al., 1974; Appleby, 1990) showed that the 20 21 stratosphere is primarily heated by the absorption of solar flux via the near-infrared (NIR) 22 23 bands of CH4 between 1 and 5 !". The heating effect of aerosols is less certain. West et 24 al. (1992) found this process to be important around 10 mbar or below, especially in the 25 26 polar regions. But other studies (Moreno and Sedano, 1997; Yelle et al., 2001) claimed 27 28 that aerosol heating is negligible. The heating from the gravity wave breaking could be 29 30 also important in the upper stratosphere (Young et al., 2005). On the other hand, the 31 32 detailed analysis by Yelle et al. (2001) revealed that the most important coolants in the 33 34 stratosphere of Jupiter are the secondary hydrocarbons, C2H2 and C2H6, with less 35 important but not negligible contributions from CH and the H -H and H -He collisional 36 4 2 2 2 37 induced transitions, through their thermal emissions at the mid-infrared (MIR) 38 39 wavelengths. 40 41 42 43 The thermal emission from those MIR bands, and the absorption from the NIR CH4 44 45 bands, can be directly observed from ground-based and space-based instruments. 46 Therefore, provided enough information can be obtained from the observations, the solar 47 48 heating and thermal cooling rates can be determined precisely to test the radiative 49 50 equilibrium hypothesis. However, previous radiative equilibrium models (Cess and 51 52 Khetan, 1973; Wallace et al., 1974; Cess and Chen, 1975; Appleby and Hogan, 1984; 53 54 Appleby, 1990; Conrath et al., 1990; West et al., 1992; Moreno and Sedano, 1997), as 55 described in Yelle et al. (2001), are all subject to large uncertainties of the temperature 56 57 and gas abundance profiles, and aerosol distributions. Yelle et al. (2001) estimated the 58 59 globally averaged temperature profile based on the Galileo probe data in the hot spot 60 61 62 63 3 64 65 1 2 3 4 (5°N) and hydrocarbon profiles based on the available ground-based and space-based 5 6 observations at that time. They concluded that radiative equilibrium could be achieved 7 8 from the gas heating and cooling rate balance, although their model tests showed a large 9 10 uncertainty range for the secondary hydrocarbon profiles, especially for C2H2. 11 12 13 The observations and related analysis of the stratosphere of Jupiter prior to 2000 are 14 15 summarized in Moses et al. (2004). Those results, although successfully revealing the 16 17 main features for certain latitudes, did not provide spatially resolved information for the 18 19 full planet. Until the analysis of the Voyager and Cassini flyby data by Simon-Miller et al. 20 21 (2006), the detailed two-dimensional temperature maps in the latitude-altitude plane have 22 23 been lacking. Later, Nixon et al. (2007; 2010) retrieved the distributions of the 24 temperature, C H and C H together, based on the Voyager and Cassini infrared spectra. 25 2 2 2 6 26 Those maps with detailed latitudinal and vertical information of the temperature and 27 28 major coolants in the stratosphere of Jupiter provide us the opportunity to analyze the 29 30 radiative heating and cooling budgets in detail. This is the first motivation of this study. 31 32 33 34 The second motivation might be more important. Although the stable stratification 35 prohibits strong vertical and lateral convection, the stratosphere is not stagnant. In fact, 36 37 observations have shown that the temperature change is much larger than can be 38 39 explained by the instantaneous radiative equilibrium model (Simon-Miller et al., 2006), 40 41 possibly owing to the effect of the stratospheric dynamics. The distributions of C2H2 and 42 43 C2H6 from Nixon et al. (2010) imply a possible meridional circulation in the stratosphere 44 45 of Jupiter because the two species also serve as the tracers for transport. The opposite 46 latitudinal trends of the short-lived species (C H ) and the long-lived species (C H ) are a 47 2 2 2 6 48 strong evidence of the horizontal advection. On the other hand, the SL-9 debris transport 49 50 model by Friedson et al. (1999) and the two-dimensional chemical-transport model by 51 52 Liang et al. (2005) suggested that the horizontal eddy mixing might be more important. 53 54 Therefore, whether the stratospheric transport is governed by horizontal diffusion or 55 advection is unsolved. Furthermore, whether the stratospheric circulation is driven by the 56 57 top-down radiative differential heating or by the bottom-up mechanical forcing from the 58 59 troposphere is not well determined either. Previous studies (e.g. Gierasch et al., 1986; 60 61 62 63 4 64 65 1 2 3 4 Conrath et al., 1990; West et al., 1992) led to different conclusions based on different 5 6 assumptions of the radiative forcing or wave drag parameterization. In order to answer 7 8 both questions, i.e., mixing versus advection, and radiative forcing versus mechanical 9 10 forcing, the spatially resolved stratospheric radiative forcing needs to be precisely 11 12 calculated. 13 14 15 This study aims to understand the radiative budget and the related uncertainties based on 16 17 the state-of-art global datasets in the stratosphere of Jupiter. We will investigate the 18 19 details of the heating rate and cooling rate in both spectral and spatial domains. Our 20 21 investigation will be divided in two parts, corresponding to two publications. In this 22 23 paper (Part I), we will analyze the Cassini and Voyager infrared spectra to quantify the 24 information of the temperature, gas abundances and their uncertainties, and calculate the 25 26 thermal cooling rate maps for the two eras using a high-resolution line-by-line radiative 27 28 transfer model, and revisit the globally averaged solar heating and thermal cooling 29 30 balance.