DOCSLIB.ORG

The Kruger National Park Rivers Research Programme (Knprrp)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Kruger National Park Rivers Research Programme (Knprrp) THE KRUGER NATIONAL PARK RIVERS RESEARCH PROGRAMME FINAL REPORT Incorporating the Contract Report and the Review Report WRC Report No. TT 130/00 April 2000 Obtainable from: Water Research Commission PO Box 824 PRETORIA 0001 DISCLAIMER This report has been reviewed by the Water Research Commission (WRC) and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the WRC, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. ISBN 1 86845 622 6 Printed in the Republic of South Africa ii CONTRACT REPORT OF THE KRUGER NATIONAL PARK RIVERS RESEARCH PROGRAMME (KNPRRP) PREPARED BY: Charles Breen Mark Dent Joan Jaganyi Bonani Madikizela Josh Maganbeharie Asaph Ndlovu Jay O’Keeffe Kevin Rogers Maritza Uys Freek Venter Programme Secretariat: Gayle Rolando National Research Foundation PO Box 2600 PRETORIA, 0001 Telephone: 012-481 4103 Telefax: 012-481 4105 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: http://www.ccwr.ac.za/knprrp/index.html iii PREFACE The Kruger National Park Rivers Research Programme was subject to external review on completion of the third phase. To enable readers to benefit from the work of the programme and the perceptions of the reviewers, this Final Report is in two parts: Contract Report and Review Report. KNPRRP Final Phase III Report : Preface iv TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .............................................................................................................................................. iv ACRONYMS ......................................................................................................................................... vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................. viii LIST OF BOXES ................................................................................................................................... ix LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................ ix LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS ................................................................................................................... ix EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 1 OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................ 6 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE .............................................................................................................. 6 INTRODUCTION TO PHASES II AND III ........................................................................................... 6 DESIGNING THE RESEARCH PROGRAMME ................................................................................ 10 KEEPING ABREAST OF CHANGE ................................................................................................... 13 MANAGEMENT .................................................................................................................................. 19 PROGRESS ........................................................................................................................................... 23 Subsidiary goals for Phase III ........................................................................................................ 45 Evaluating goal attainment ............................................................................................................. 56 STRENGTHS OF THE PROGRAMME ............................................................................................... 59 WEAKNESSES .................................................................................................................................... 59 Internal ........................................................................................................................................... 59 External .......................................................................................................................................... 60 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................... 61 RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................................................... 62 BUDGET AND ALLOCATIONS......................................................................................................... 65 KNPRRP: PROJECT DATABASE ...................................................................................................... 71 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................................... 78 SUBPROGRAMME REPORTS ........................................................................................................... 80 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND FACILITATION SUBPROGRAMME ............................. 80 RESEARCH SUBPROGRAMME ...................................................................................................... 104 INTEGRATED RIVER MANAGEMENT SUBPROGRAMME ....................................................... 117 MONITORING SUBPROGRAMME ................................................................................................. 132 CORRECTIVE ACTION SUBPROGRAMME .................................................................................. 148 PERCEPTIONS OF THE KRUGER NATIONAL PARK AND PROGRAMME PARTNER REPORTS ........................................................................................................................................... 154 CORRECTIVE ACTION: J. JAGANYI ............................................................................................. 156 MONITORING: B. MADIKIZELA .................................................................................................... 157 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND FACILITATION: J. MAGANBEHARIE ........................ 158 INTEGRATED RIVER MANAGEMENT: M. UYS .......................................................................... 160 KNPRRP Final Phase III Report : Table of Contents v ACRONYMS ACRU Agricultural Catchment Research Unit APNR Associated Private Nature Reserves ARC Agricultural Research Council ARCVIEW GIS Software BASINS Better Assessment Science Integrating Non-point and Point Sources BEEH Bioresources Engineering and Environmental Hydrology BLINKS Linking of Abiotic and Biotic Prediction Capabilities BWB Bushbuckridge Water Board CALSITE Name of a Simulation Model CCWR Computing Centre for Water Research CMA Catchment Management Agency CMC Catchment Management Committee CWE Centre for Water in the Environment DEAT Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism DALA Department of Agriculture and Land Affairs DSOH Desired State Objectives Hierarchy DSS Decision Support System DWAF Department of Water Affairs and Forestry FRD Foundation for Research Development GenScn Tool for the Generation and Analysis of Model Simulation Scenarios for Watersheds GIS Geographic Information System HBU Historically Black University HSPF Hydrological Simulation Programme Fortran HYDROCOM Company Name GMS Goal Maintenance System ICIS Integrated Catchment Information System ICM Integrated Catchment Management IFR Instream Flow Requirement IGS Institute for Groundwater Studies IM&F Information Management and Facilitation Subprogramme INR Institute of Natural Resources IRMP Integrated River Management Subprogramme IUCN International Union for the Conservation of Nature IWQS Institute for Water Quality Studies IWR Institute for Water Research KNP Kruger National Park KNPRRP Kruger National Park Rivers Research Programme KOBWA Komati Basin Water Authority MPB Mpumalanga Parks Board NPB National Parks Board - now South African National Parks (SANP) NPDALE Northern Province Department of Agriculture, Land and Environment NRF National Research Foundation NRI National Rivers Initiative ORF Olifants River Forum PC Policy Committee PDMC Programme Development and Management Committee QRBM Quantitative Rule Based Model KNPRRP Final Phase III Report: Acronyms vi ACRONYMS (Continued) RCHRES Reach or Reservoir Segment of a River RHP River Health Programme SAFCOL South African Forestry Company Ltd SAM Strategic Adaptive Management SANP South African National Parks SAPPI South African Paper & Pulp Industry SASAQS Southern African Society of Aquatic Scientists SASS South African Scoring System SEDFLO Sediment Flow Model SIDA Swedish International Development Agency SRWG Sabie River Working Group TPC Threshold of Probable Concern UCI User Control Input UCT University of Cape Town UNP University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg UNITRA University of Transkei UFS University of the Free State USAID United States Agency for International Development USGS United States Geological Survey USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency UV University of Venda UZ University of Zululand WATERLIT Water Literature Database WDM Watershed Data Management System WRC Water Research Commission KNPRRP Final Phase III Report: Acronyms vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Kruger National Park Rivers Research Programme was conceptualised and has been conducted as a collaborative joint venture between researchers, stakeholders, resource managers and funders. All have had their roles to play and none is more or less important than another. It
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bezhoek Heritage Report
    Francois P Coetzee Heritage Survey of the farm Bezuidenhoutshoek 274JS Cultural Heritage Survey of the Farm Bezuidenhoutshoek 274JS, Magisterial District of Middelburg, Mpumalanga For Bezuidenhoutshoek Farm (Pty) Ltd P O Box 1152 Gallo Manor 2052 By Francois P Coetzee Department of Anthropology & Archaeology University of South Africa PO Box 392 Pretoria 0003 Tel: (012) 429 6297 Fax: (012) 429 6091 [email protected] August 2009 Francois P Coetzee Heritage Survey of the farm Bezuidenhoutshoek 274JS Contents Executive Summary 1. Introduction 2. Terms of Reference 3. Nature of the Proposed Activity or Development 4. Definitions and Approach 5. Methodology 5.1 Maps and Other Sources 5.2 Fieldwork 5.3 Visibility and Constraints 6. Description of Study Area 7. Archaeological Sequence 8. Archaeological Context 8.1 Stone Age 8.2 Iron Age Sequence 8.3 Ethno-historical Context 9. Description of Sites 10. Summary of Sites 11. Rock Art Sites 12. Director-General: Survey Maps 13. Conclusions and Recommendations Bibliography Francois P Coetzee Heritage Survey of the farm Bezuidenhoutshoek 274JS Executive Summary This report focuses on the results from a cultural heritage investigation on the farm Bezuidenhoutshoek 274JS. The area is characterised by mountainous areas (featuring the Olifants River) as well as open grassland. The area has a rich cultural heritage with Ndebele people living in the area since AD1650 and white farmers settling in the late 19th Century. Iron Age settlements Five Late Iron Age stone-walled settlements were recorded during the survey. These are preliminarily associated with Ndzundza-Ndebele occupation (AD 1650 – AD 1830). Some of these sites are extensive and have substantial archaeological deposits.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Affairs in the Lower Blyde River the Role of DWAF in Local Water Management
    Water Affairs in the Lower Blyde River The role of DWAF in local water management IWMI Working Paper B.W. Raven, April 2004, Wageningen Acknowledgments The author likes to thank specifically Barbara van Koppen (IWMI) and Jeroen Warner (Wageningen University) for their help and contribution to this case study. The author further thanks: Willy Enright (DWAF Western Cape), Edward Lahiff (Western Cape University), Cees Leeuwis (Wageningen University), Derek Weston and Francois van der Merwe (DWAF Pretoria), Gert Bezuidenhout Johan Du Preez (Lower Blyde River WUA) Francis Mohlala (Mametja / Sekororo communities), Marie Tinka Uys (Environmental issues Blyde River), Gerhard Backeberg (WRC Pretoria), Anthony Turton (AWIRU Pretoria), Herve Levite, Nicholas Faysse, Tebogo Seshoka and other colleagues of IWMI Pretoria. 1 Content 1 Introduction 1.1 Case Study: The Lower Blyde River 1.2 The Case Study in perspective: South Africa and The Netherlands 1.3 Case Study Objectives 2 General Background 2.1 Multi Stakeholder Participation 2.2 Former SA irrigation policy 2.3 The new SA water policy: NWA 1998 2.4 Building CMAs and WUAs 3 The Lower Blyde River 3.1 The Blyde River Catchment 3.2 Stakeholders 3.2.1 Irrigation Farmers 3.2.2 Mametja / Sekororo Communities 3.2.3 Upstream Stakeholders 3.2.4 Downstream Stakeholders 3.2.5 Governments involved 4 Water Management in the Lower Blyde River 4.1 The Lower Blyde WUA 4.2 The Lower Blyde Irrigation Pipeline 4.3 The 800ha Black Emerging Farmers Project 4.4 Domestic Water Supply Mametja / Sekororo communities 5 Conclusions Bibliography Annex: list of interviews 2 1 Introduction “The new South Africa is the world in microcosm, in its population mix, its wealth gap and above all in the impact which the new forces of globalisation are having on it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of the Olifants River Area, Transvaal
    REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VANSUID-AFRIKA· DEPARTMENT OF MINES DEPARTEMENT VAN MYNWESE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIESE OPNAME THE GEOLOGY OF THE OLIFANTS RIVER AREA, TRANSVAAL AN EXPLANATION OF SHEETS 2429B (CHUNIESPOORT) AND 2430A (WOLKBERG) by J. S. I. Sehwellnus, D.Se., L. N. J. Engelbrecht, B.Sc., F. J. Coertze, B.Sc. (Hons.), H. D. Russell, B.Sc., S. J. Malherbe, B.Sc. (Hons.), D. P. van Rooyen, B.Sc., and R. Cooke, B.Sc. Met 'n opsomming in Afrikaans onder die opskrif: DIE GEOLOGIE VAN DIE GEBIED OLIFANTSRIVIER, TRANSVAAL COPYRIGHT RESERVED/KOPIEREG VOORBEHOU (1962) Printed by and obtainable (rom Gedruk deur en verkrygbaar the Government Printer, B(ls~ van die Staatsdrukker, Bosman­ man Street, Pretoria. straat, Pretoria. Geological map in colour on a Geologiese kaart in kleur op 'n scale of I: 125,000 obtainable skaal van I: 125.000 apart ver­ separately at the price of 60c. krygbaar teen die prys van 60c. & .r.::-~ h'd'~, '!!~l p,'-' r\ f: ~ . ~) t,~ i"'-, i CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT ........................ ' ••• no ..........' ........" ... • • • • • • • • •• 1 I. INTRODUCTION........ •.••••••••.••••••••.....••...•.•..••••..• 3 II. PHYSIOGRAPHY................................................ 4 A. ToPOGRAPHY..... • • . • • . • . • • . • • • . • • . • . • • • • • . • • • • • . • • • • • • ... 4 B. DRAINAGE.................................................... 6 C. CLIMATE ..........•.••••.•••••.••....................... ,.... 7 D. VEGETATION .••••.•••••.•.........•..... , ..............•... , . 7 III. GEOLOGICAL FORMATIONS ....................
    [Show full text]
  • Insights from the Kruger National Park, South Africa
    Morphodynamic response of a dryland river to an extreme flood Morphodynamics of bedrock-influenced dryland rivers during extreme floods: Insights from the Kruger National Park, South Africa David Milan1,†, George Heritage2, Stephen Tooth3, and Neil Entwistle4 1School of Environmental Sciences, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK 2AECOM, Exchange Court, 1 Dale Street, Liverpool, L2 2ET, UK 3 Department of Geography and Earth Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Llandinam Building, Penglais Campus, Aberystwyth, SY23 3DB, UK 4School of Environment and Life Sciences, Peel Building, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, UK ABSTRACT some subreaches, remnant islands and vege- the world’s population (United Nations, 2016). tation that survived the 2000 floods were re- Drylands are characterized by net annual mois- High-magnitude flood events are among moved during the smaller 2012 floods owing ture deficits resulting from low annual precipita- the world’s most widespread and signifi- to their wider exposure to flow. These find- tion and high potential evaporation, and typically cant natural hazards and play a key role in ings were synthesized to refine and extend a by strong climatic variability. Although precipi- shaping river channel–floodplain morphol- conceptual model of bedrock-influenced dry- tation regimes vary widely, many drylands are ogy and riparian ecology. Development of land river response that incorporates flood subject to extended dry periods and occasional conceptual and quantitative models for the sequencing, channel type, and sediment sup- intense rainfall events. Consequently, dryland response of bedrock-influenced dryland ply influences. In particular, with some cli- rivers are commonly defined by long periods rivers to such floods is of growing scientific mate change projections indicating the po- with very low or no flow, interspersed with in- and practical importance, but in many in- tential for future increases in the frequency frequent, short-lived, larger flows.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Glorious AFS Itinerary Jun 17 Air Is
    Our Glorious AFS Itinerary Jun 17 Air is so easy round-trip to Jo’burg (JNB)! Full details to come on this in AFS Trip Tips with info about flights, overnight options, packing, etc. We urge you to fly in a day early to arrive Jun 18. Full details to come on all air options, overnight options and packing in AFS trips tips. Day 1: Fri, Jun 19 Chisomo Safari Camp, Kruger Private Reserves Our land tour officially begins! We gather early morning at JNB Airport and fly an hour to Kruger. We arrive in time for lunch and a short rest before heading out on your first afternoon game drive. South Africa This vast country is undoubtedly one of the most culturally and geographically diverse places on earth. Fondly known by locals as the 'Rainbow Nation', South Africa has 11 official languages and its multicultural inhabitants are influenced by a fascinating mix of cultures. Discover the gourmet restaurants, impressive art scene, vibrant nightlife and beautiful beaches of Cape Town; enjoy a local braai (barbecue) in the Soweto Township; browse the bustling Indian markets in Durban; or sample some of the world’s finest wines at the myriad wine estates dotting the Cape Winelands. Some historical attractions to explore include the Zululand battlefields of KwaZulu-Natal, the Apartheid Museum in Johannesburg and Robben Island, just off the coast of Cape Town. Above all else, its remarkably untamed wilderness with its astonishing range of wildlife roaming freely across massive unfenced game reserves such as the world-famous Kruger National Park. With all of this variety on offer, it is little wonder that South Africa has fast become Africa’s most popular tourist destination.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 a Report on an Archaeological Impact
    Archaetnos Culture & Cultural Resource Consultants BK 98 09854/23 A REPORT ON AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED TUMELO COLLIERY PROJECT APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO INCLUDE PARTIAL PILLAR EXTRCTION, MIDDELBURG, MPUMALANGA PROVINCE For: CABANGA CONCEPTS E-mail: [email protected] REPORT NO.: AE02019V By: Prof. A.C. van Vollenhoven (L.AKAD.SA.) Accredited member of ASAPA (Accreditation number: 166) Accredited member of SASCH (Accreditation number: CH001), Johan Smit, BA (Hons) & Daniël Viljoen , BA (Hons) 30 April 2020 Archaetnos P.O. Box 55 GROENKLOOF 0027 Tel: 083 291 6104 Fax: 086 520 4173 E-mail: [email protected] Member: AC van Vollenhoven BA, BA (Hons), DTO, NDM, MA (Archaeology) [UP], MA (Culture History) [US], DPhil (Archaeology) [UP], Man Dip [TUT], D Phil (History) [US] 1 SUBMISSION OF REPORT Please note that the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) or one of its subsidiary bodies needs to comment on this report. It is the client’s responsibility to do the submission via the SAHRIS System on the SAHRA website. Clients are advised not to proceed with any action before receiving the necessary comments from SAHRA. DISCLAIMER Although all possible care is taken to identify all sites of cultural importance during the survey of study areas, the nature of archaeological and historical sites is as such that it always is possible that hidden or subterranean sites could be overlooked during the study. Archaetnos and its personnel will not be held liable for such oversights or for costs incurred as a result thereof. Should it be necessary to visit a site again as a result of the above mentioned, an additional appointment is required.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 1 AIA / HIA Sabie Hydro Project, Hazyview
    SPECIALIST REPORT PHASE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL / HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR PROPOSED SABIE HYDRO POWER (PTY Ltd) PROJECT, ON PORTION 17 OF THE FARM TEVREDE 178 JT, HAZYVIEW, MPUMALANGA PROVINCE REPORT COMPILED FOR RHENGU ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES MR. RALF KALWA P.O. Box 1046, MALELANE, 1320 Cell: 0824147088 / Fax: 0866858003 / e-mail: [email protected] SEPTEMBER 2016 ADANSONIA HERITAGE CONSULTANTS ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN PROFESSIONAL ARCHAEOLOGISTS C. VAN WYK ROWE E-MAIL: [email protected] Tel: 0828719553 / Fax: 0867151639 P.O. BOX 75, PILGRIM'S REST, 1290 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Phase 1 Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) regarding archaeological and other cultural heritage resources was conducted on the footprint for the proposed Sabie Hydro Power project next to the Sabie River near Hazyview. The study area is located on portion 17 of the farm TEVREDE 178JT, Hazyview. The farm is situated on topographical maps, 1:50 000, 2530 BB (SABIE) & 2531 AA (KIEPERSOL), which is in the Mpumalanga Province. The study area is situated on 2530 BB SABIE. This area falls under the jurisdiction of the Ehlanzeni District Municipality, and Thaba Chweu Local Municipality. The National Heritage Resources Act, no 25 (1999)(NHRA), protects all heritage resources, which are classified as national estate. The NHRA stipulates that any person who intends to undertake a development, is subjected to the provisions of the Act. The applicants (private landowner with some shareholders) in co-operation with Rhengu Environmental Services are requesting the establishment of a hydro facility on the Sabie River near Hazyview. There was a hydro facility on the farm approximately 40 years ago and the new one will follow more or less the same route and alignment.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Metal Speciation in the Sabie River Catchment, Mpumalanga, South Africa
    18th JOHANNESBURG Int'l Conference on Science, Engineering, Technology & Waste Management (SETWM-20) Nov. 16-17, 2020 Johannesburg (SA) Seasonal Metal Speciation in the Sabie River Catchment, Mpumalanga, South Africa 1,2R. Lusunzi, 1E. Fosso-Kankeu, 1F. Waanders of water. Abstract - The present study investigated the hydrochemical Various anthropogenic sources which include mining, characteristic changes of the Sabie River catchment. Water sampling agricultural activities and industrial wastewater contribute to was done in November and December (wet season, 2019) and July pollution of surface water [1], [2]. Various factors that influence (Dry season, 2020). Physicochemical parameters and metal speciation were analyzed to assess their impact on water quality and fitness for the mobility of the likely or definite contaminants from human consumption. The hydrochemical characteristics of Sabie anthropogenic activities such as mining and mineral processing catchment showed variation of quality with seasons when compared activities had been described [3] and [4]. These factors include with drinking water guidelines. Seepage from Nestor tailings storage occurrence, abundance, reactivity and hydrology. The term facility (TSF) was also collected during wet season. In both season, species had been defined as different forms of a particular aqueous metal speciation was done using the PHREEQC geochemical 2+ 2- element or its compounds [5]. For this study, the term speciation modelling code. Higher concentrations of Ca and SO4 were found in mine water while the dominant anion and cation were Mg2+ and Cl- had been used to indicate the distribution of species in samples in surface water samples. Additionally, the seasonal variation in the from the Sabie catchment.
    [Show full text]
  • River Flow and Quality
    Setting the Thresholds of Potential Concern for River Flow and Quality Rationale All of the seven major rivers which flow in an easterly direction through the Kruger National Park (KNP) originate in the higher lying areas west of the KNP where they are highly utilised (Du Toit, Rogers and Biggs 2003). The KNP lies in a relatively arid (490 mm KNP average rainfall) area and thus the rivers are a crucially important component for the conservation of biodiversity in the KNP (Du Toit, Rogers and Biggs 2003). Population growth in the eastern Lowveld of South Africa during the past three decades has brought with it numerous environmental challenges. These include, but are not limited to, extensive planting of exotic plantations, overgrazing, erosion, over-utilisation and pollution of rivers, as well as clearing of indigenous forests from large areas in the upper catchments outside the borders of the KNP. The degradation of each river varies in character, intensity and causes with a substantial impact on downstream users. The successful management of these rivers poses one of the most serious challenges to the KNP. However, over the past 10 years South Africa has revolutionised its water legislation (National Water Act, Act number 36 of 1998). This Act substantially elevated the status of the environmental needs, through defining the ecological reserve as a priority water requirement. In other words this entails water of sufficient flow and quality to maintain the integrity of the ecological system, including the water therein, for human use. With the current levels of abstraction in the upper catchments, the KNP quite simply does not receive the water quantity and quality required to maintain the in-stream biota.
    [Show full text]
  • Kruger National Park River Research: a History of Conservation and the ‘Reserve’ Legislation in South Africa (1988-2000)
    Kruger National Park river research: A history of conservation and the ‘reserve’ legislation in South Africa (1988-2000) L. van Vuuren 23348674 Dissertation submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Magister Artium in History at the School of Basic Sciences, Vaal Triangle campus of the North-West University Supervisor: Prof J.W.N. Tempelhoff May 2017 DECLARATION I declare that this dissertation is my own, unaided work. It is being submitted for the degree of Masters of Arts in the subject group History, School of Basic Sciences, Vaal Triangle Faculty, North-West University. It has not been submitted before for any degree or examination in any other university. L. van Vuuren May 2017 i ABSTRACT Like arteries in a human body, rivers not only transport water and life-giving nutrients to the landscape they feed, they are also shaped and characterised by the catchments which they drain.1 The river habitat and resultant biodiversity is a result of several physical (or abiotic) processes, of which flow is considered the most important. Flows of various quantities and quality are required to flush away sediments, transport nutrients, and kick- start life processes in the freshwater ecosystem. South Africa’s river systems are characterised by particularly variable flow regimes – a result of the country’s fluctuating climate regime, which varies considerably between wet and dry seasons. When these flows are disrupted or diminished through, for example, direct water abstraction or the construction of a weir or dam, it can have severe consequences on the ecological process which depend on these flows.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence from the Sabie and Olifants Rivers, Eastern South Africa
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Salford Institutional Repository Sediment Dynamics from the Summit to the Sea (Proceedings of a symposium held in New Orleans, Louisiana, USA 1 11–14 December 2014) (IAHS Publ. 367, 2014). Long-term flood controls on semi-arid river form: evidence from the Sabie and Olifants rivers, eastern South Africa GEORGE HERITAGE1, STEPHEN TOOTH2, NEIL ENTWISTLE3 & DAVID MILAN4 1 AECOM. Exchange Court, 1 Dale Street, Liverpool L2 2ET, UK [email protected] 2 UK Department of Geography and Earth Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Llandinam Building, Penglais Campus, Aberystwyth SY23 3DB, UK 3 University of Salford, Peel Building, University of Salford, Salford M5 4WT, UK 4 Department of Geography, Environment and Earth Sciences, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull HU6 7RX, UK Abstract Rivers in the Kruger National Park, eastern South Africa, are characterised by bedrock-influenced ‘macrochannels’ containing variable alluvial thicknesses and riparian vegetation assemblages. Evidence from the Sabie and Olifants rivers suggests that flows up to moderate floods (<3500 m3 s-1) tend to result in net alluviation, with sediments gradually covering the underlying bedrock. More extreme floods strip alluvium and erode bedrock, effectively exerting the primary control over long-term river morphologic development. On the Olifants River, post-flood aerial LIDAR imagery reveals that the 2012 extreme flood (~14000 m3 s-1) resulted in extensive stripping of stored alluvial sediment, exposing and eroding the underlying weathered bedrock. On the Sabie River, preliminary optically stimulated luminescence ages for remnant alluvium are all less than 1000 years, highlighting typical timescales of sediment storage.
    [Show full text]
  • Bushbuckridge Mpumalanga Nodal Economic Profiling Project Business Trust & Dplg, 2007 Bushbuckridge Context
    Nodal Economic Profiling Project Bushbuckridge Mpumalanga Nodal Economic Profiling Project Business Trust & dplg, 2007 Bushbuckridge Context IInn 22000011,, SSttaattee PPrreessiiddeenntt TThhaabboo MMbbeekkii aannnnoouunncceedd aann iinniittiiaattiivvee ttoo aaddddrreessss uunnddeerrddeevveellooppmmeenntt iinn tthhee mmoosstt sseevveerreellyy iimmppoovveerriisshheedd rruurraall aanndd uurrbbaann aarreeaass ((““ppoovveerrttyy nnooddeess””)) iinn SSoouutthh AAffrriiccaa,, wwhhiicchh hhoouussee aarroouunndd tteenn mmiilllliioonn ppeeooppllee.. TThhee UUrrbbaann RReenneewwaall PPrrooggrraammmmee ((uurrpp)) aanndd tthhee IInntteeggrraatteedd SSuussttaaiinnaabbllee RRuurraall Maruleng DDeevveellooppmmeenntt PPrrooggrraammmmee (isrdp) were created in 2001 to Sekhukhune (isrdp) were created in 2001 to aaddddrreessss ddeevveellooppmmeenntt iinn tthheessee Bushbuckridge aarreeaass.. TThheessee iinniittiiaattiivveess aarree Alexandra hhoouusseedd iinn tthhee DDeeppaarrttmmeenntt ooff Kgalagadi Umkhanyakude PPrroovviinncciiaall aanndd LLooccaall GGoovveerrnnmmeenntt ((ddppllgg)).. Zululand Maluti-a-Phofung Umzinyathi Galeshewe Umzimkhulu I-N-K Alfred Nzo Ukhahlamba Ugu Central Karoo OR Tambo Chris Hani Mitchell’s Plain Mdantsane Khayelitsha Motherwell UUP-WRD-Bushbuckridge Profile-301106-IS 2 Nodal Economic Profiling Project Business Trust & dplg, 2007 Bushbuckridge Bushbuckridge poverty node Activities z Research process Documents People z Overview z Economy – Overview – Selected sector: Tourism – Selected sector: Agriculture z Investment opportunities
    [Show full text]