Rijeka Bypass Project [EBRD
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Nacrt Plana Razvoja Širokopojasne Infrastrukture: Gradovi Novi Vinodolski, Crikvenica, Kraljevica I Općina Vinodolska
Nacrt plana razvoja širokopojasne infrastrukture: gradovi Novi Vinodolski, Crikvenica, Kraljevica i Općina Vinodolska Rev A Nacrt plana razvoja širokopojasne infrastrukture: gradovi Novi Vinodolski, Crikvenica, Kraljevica i Općina Vinodolska [Prazno] Nacrt plana razvoja širokopojasne infrastrukture: gradovi Novi Vinodolski, Crikvenica, Kraljevica i Općina Vinodolska SADRŽAJ 1 Svrha Izrade Plana 5 1.1 Uvod 5 1.2 Ključni faktori i polazišta 7 1.3 Glavni ciljevi plana razvoja 8 1.4 Struktura dokumenta 8 1.5 Širokopojasne mreže 9 2 Opis projekta 22 2.1 Definiranje nositelja projekta (NP) 22 2.2 Prostorni obuhvat projekta 23 2.3 Ciljevi projekta 26 3 Detaljna analiza demografskih, socijalnih i gospodarskih koristi koje projekt donosi unutar ciljanih područja provedbe projekta 27 3.1 Socio-ekonomska analiza Grada Novog Vinodolskog [] 28 3.2 Analiza socio-ekonomskog stanja Grada Crikvenice [] 56 3.3 Analiza socio-ekonomskog stanja Grada Kraljevice [] 92 3.4 Analiza socio-ekonomskog stanja Općine Vinodolske [] 131 3.5 Analiza koristi od projekta 166 3.6 Prikaz postojeće infrastrukture Grada Novog Vinodolskog 168 3.7 Prikaz postojeće infrastrukture Grada Crikvenice 175 3.8 Prikaz postojeće infrastrukture Grada Kraljevice 181 3.9 Prikaz postojeće infrastrukture Općine Vinodolske 188 3.10 Analiza stanja postojeće širokopojasne infrastrukture te dostupnost i ponuda usluga za pojedine kategorije krajnjih korisnika 193 4 Nacrt plana razvoja širokopojasne mreže Konzorcija 218 4.1 Definiranje svih potencijalnih korisnika u projektu i njihova lokacija -
Construction of the New Zagreb Deep Sea Container Terminal
www.portauthority.hr Overview BASINS • PRA was founded in 1996 to managing, planning and strategic development port of Rijeka • Port operations contracted to various concession holders • The port of Rijeka is a multi-purpose port facility RIJEKA SUŠAK BAKAR capable of handling various type of cargo at 5 basins PORT PORT AREA • Total of 53 concessionaires and 81 (concluded) concession agreements • International concessionaires in the basic port activities • Port area management and development OMIŠALJ RAŠA • Control of arrival and departure of vessels (VTS Maneuvering Sector Rijeka) www.portauthority.hr Overview . General cargo terminal . Project and heavy cargo terminal Basin Rijeka Luka Rijeka d.d. Frigo terminal . Cereal Terminal - Silo Basin Sušak . Container Terminal Adriatic Gate Container Terminal (ICTSI Group) Škrljevo Inland Terminal - Owned by the Luka Rijeka d.d. Basin Omišalj . Oil terminal JANAF . Bulk cargo terminal Basin Bakar Luka Rijeka d.d. Ro-Ro terminal . Livestock terminal Luka Rijeka d.d. Basin Raša www.portauthority.hr. Timber terminal EXPORTDRVO ltd. Hinterland warehouse Štalije ŠERIF EXPORT – IMPORT j.s.c. Strategic position Mediterranean Corridor Baltic-Adriatic Corridor Strategic position and advantages Warsaw • Croatia’s largest international deep sea cargo port located in Berlin the Northern Adriatic Prague • The TEN-T core port located on the Mediterranean corridor Bratislava Munich Vienna • Gateway port to the Republic of Croatia and important transit Budapest Bern Bucharest port to CEE Countries (Hungary, -
CBD First National Report
30 PART 1.: AN OVERVIEW OF THE STATE OF BIOLOGICAL AND LANDSCAPE DIVERSITY IN CROATIA Threats to biological communities in the Adriatic Anthropogenic impacts pose a constant threat to living communities in shallow coastline areas. This primarily refers to building works carried out on the coast, to backfilling and consequential mudding of some parts of the sea, to solid waste disposal and particularly to pollution by unpurified waste waters of municipal and industrial origin. These factors pose threat to living communities of supralittoral and mediolittoral zones, and especially meadows of sea flowers Posidonia oceanica and Zostera marina (Box 27) belonging to communities of the infralittoral zone. A highly intensive process of filling up the coastal sea with diverse building and earthworks wastes is adversely affecting the settlements of various algae of genus Cystoseria, including the settlements of the endemic brown alga Adriatic wrack (Fig. 46) that has almost completely disappeared from some polluted parts of the Adriatic (western coast of Istria, Split, etc.). The degradation of ecological balance of benthonic ecosystems is also a result of excessive fishing for economic and sport reasons, including the ravaging of individual divers. In the shallow sea man particularly threatens the complex communities of photophilous algae and meadows of Posidonia oceanica, while in the depths of the sea the communities of the detrital bottom are most threatened due to consequences of natural stress conditions, and the communities of the muddy bottom due to excessive trawling. The immigration (or introduction) of the tropical green algae Caulerpa in the northern Mediterranean in 1984 represents another threat to biological diversity of the Figure 48. -
Doktorski Študijski Program Tretje Stopnje GRAJENO OKOLJE Cycle
Univerza v Ljubljani Fakulteta za gradbeništvo in geodezijo Učni načrti Doktorski študijski program tretje stopnje GRAJENO OKOLJE Course Syllabi 3th cycle doctoral study programme BUILT ENVIRONMENT 2016_5 KAZALO / TABLE OF CONTENTS Obvezni predmeti/ Obligatory courses Orodja in metode v raziskovanju grajenega okolja / Tools and Methods in Research of Built Environment ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Prostorsko načrtovalsko raziskovanje / Spatial Planning Research ...................................................... 10 Raziskovanje v geodeziji / Research in Geodesy ................................................................................... 15 Izbirni predmet/Elective course Aplikativna geokemija okolja / Applied Environmental Geochemistry ................................................. 18 Bioklimatsko načrtovanje / Bioclimatic Design ..................................................................................... 21 Biotski odgovor na globalne paleoekološke spremembe / Biotic Response to Global Paleoecological Change ................................................................................................................................................... 24 Deformacijska analiza naravnega in grajenega okolja / Deformation Analysis of Natural and Built Environment .......................................................................................................................................... 27 -
Kolektivna Memorija Grada I Okolice Na Internetu
godina X. / br. 34 / rijeka / travanj 2014. / besplatni primjerak magazin primorsko-goranske županije Riječka enciklopedija Fluminensia Kolektivna memorija grada i okolice na internetu plus prilog Grad OpÊina Adamićeva 10, 51000 Rijeka »abar Skrad T: ++385 51 351-600 F: ++385 51 212-948 opcine Narodnog oslobođenja 2, [email protected] • www.pgz.hr Josipa Blaževića-Blaža 8, 51306 Čabar 51311 Skrad gradovi T: ++385 51 829 490 Republika Hrvatska Primorsko-goranska T: ++385 51 810 620 æupanija Župan: F: ++385 51 821 137 F: ++385 51 810 680 Zlatko Komadina E: [email protected] E: [email protected] www.cabar.hr www.skrad.hr Zamjenici župana: Gradonačelnik: Načelnik: Marina Medarić Kristijan Rajšel Najmanje Damir Grgurić Marko Boras Mandić Predsjednik Vijeća: Predsjednik vijeća: stanovnika Grad Josip Malnar Ivan Crnković Općina Brod Petar Mamula Vrbovsko Moravice Predsjednik Županijske skupštine: 865 Goranska ulica 1, OpÊina OpÊina Grad OpÊina OpÊina 51326 Vrbovsko Erik Fabijanić Viškovo Klana Kastav Jelenje »avle Grad OpÊina OpÊina T: ++385 51 875 115 F: ++385 51 875 008 Vozišće 3, 51216 Viškovo Klana 33, 51217 Klana Zakona kastafskega 3, Dražičkih boraca 64, Čavle 206, 51219 Čavle Delnice Brod Moravice Ravna Gora E: [email protected] T: ++385 51 503 770 T: ++385 51 808 205 51215 Kastav T: ++385 51 208 310 51218 Jelenje Trg 138. brigade HV 4, Stjepana Radića 1, I.G. Kovačića 177, 51314 F: ++385 51 257 521 F: ++385 51 808 708 T: ++385 51 691 452 F: ++385 51 208 311 Gradonačelnik: F:++385 51 691 454 T: ++385 51 208 080 51300 Delnice 51312 -
Službene Novine Općine Mošćenička Draga
Odluka je preuzeta s poveznice: http://www.moscenicka-draga.hr/Baza/MDraga/Users/TAHIR/ SLU%C5%BDBENE%20NOVINE%20OP%C4%86INE%20MO%C5%A0%C4%86ENI%C4%8CKA%20DRAGA%20-%2011-2017.pdf, 03.01.2018. ISSN 1848-7637 SLUŽBENE NOVINE OPĆINE MOŠĆENIČKA DRAGA Mošćenička Draga, Broj: 11/2017 Godina: 2017. 22. prosinca 2017. IZDAVAČ: OPĆINA MOŠĆENIČKA DRAGA UREDNIŠTVO: TRG SLOBODE 7-51417 MOŠĆENIČKA DRAGA, TEL: 051/737-621 ODGOVORNI UREDNIK: RIKARDO STARAJ IZLAZI: PO POTREBI WEB: www.moscenicka-draga.hr Službene novine Općine Mošćenička Draga Broj 11/2017 SADRŽAJ: OPĆINA MOŠĆENIČKA DRAGA II. Općinsko vijeće 55. Odluka o zakupu i kupoprodaji poslovnog prostora…………………………….…......…..……3 56. Odluka o provođenju postupka stavljanja izvan snage Detaljnog plana uređenja „Presika-Brseč“, Detaljnog plana uređenja „Presika 1- Brseč“ i Detaljnog plana „Žuntarovo – Brseč“…………………………………………………………………………..16 57. Izvješće o stanju u prostoru Općine Mošćenička Draga za razdoblje od 2013. do 2016. godine…………………………………………………….…..21 58. III. Izmjene i dopune Proračuna Općine Mošćenička Draga za 2017. godinu………………….82 59. III. Izmjene Programa javnih potreba u kulturi u Općini Mošćenička Draga za 2017. godinu..140 60. III. Izmjene Programa gradnje objekata i uređaja komunalne infrastrukture na području Općine Mošćenička Draga za 2017. godinu……………………………………..141 61. III. Izmjene Plana gradnje komunalnih vodnih građevina za 2017. godinu…………………..143 62. Proračun Općine Mošćenička Draga za 2018. godinu i projekcije za 2019. i 2020. godinu.....144 63. Odluka o izvršavanju Proračuna Općine Mošćenička Draga za 2018. godinu…………...….188 64. Program javnih potreba u predškolskom i školskom odgoju i obrazovanju u Općini Mošćenička Draga za 2018. godinu………………………………………………...193 65. Program javnih potreba u kulturi u Općini Mošćenička Draga za 2018. -
An Story About the Maritime Heritage of the Northern Adriatic
An inspiring story about the maritime heritage of the northern Adriatic PEN SHELL / Pinna nobilis The largest and most famous mollusc that is endemic to the Mediterranean resides on sandy seabeds, where it cohabitates with MOŠĆENIČKA DRAGA seagrass. Sometimes it produces pearls and it “Tiny is especially valued for its sea silk, which was used to make royal garments. It was also the fabric that made up the golden fleece, from IZOLA RIJEKA which the story of Jason and the ancient boat ” Greek heroes known as the Argonauts was Moving ahead through life at full sail weaved. PIRAN ife by and on the sea, the art of survival and creating experiences and good practices that are passed on from one Lgeneration to another and that are woven into the very identity of maritime communities; that which comprises the essence of maritime ROVINJ KRK heritage, that which we are proud of, that we wish to show, share and enjoy with others - coalescing in the area ranging from the Slovenian Littoral, across Istria and to Kvarner - that is what “Tiny Boat” is all about. To renovate traditional vessels - wooden boats and smacks - to encourage the preservation MALI LOŠINJ of knowledge about traditional wooden boat building, to collect tangible and intangible / NEREZINE heritage materials and make them available in the modern virtual world, while ensuring that they are preserved in their original historic forms in museum collections and exhibits at visitor’s centres; to enjoy one’s own heritage and enrich the tourism offering, to organise sailing, boat races, events and sea festivals, where we can socialise with our guests; to enjoy what we have inherited from our grandfathers and what we will pass on to our grandchildren. -
Traffic Connectivity in Croatia in the Past: the Dubrovnik Region Case
Athens Journal of History - Volume 1, Issue 3 – Pages 195-204 Traffic Connectivity in Croatia in the Past: The Dubrovnik Region Case By Marija Benić Penava This paper analyses the development of traffic routes in the far south of Croatia during the 19th and 20th century. Poor traffic connectivity was the consequence of traffic policy which was subordinated to the interests of Vienna in the Austro- Hungarian Monarchy, and after World War I, to Belgrade. Since the Dubrovnik region was oriented towards the sea, and since traditionally it had strong entrepreneurship and sea traffic that enabled great economic prosperity of Dubrovnik in the past centuries. Ships flying the flag of Sveti Vlaho (Saint Blaise, the patron saint of the city) were present in the Mediterranean and the world’s oceans, yet the service industry which Dubrovnik provided was completed by tourism only in the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. The perception of Dubrovnik as a world tourist destination was established in the first half of the 20th century and that could only be maintained by quality traffic routes. Therefore it was extremely important for the prosperity of the far south of Croatia to have and retain the best connectivity by railway as well as sea, land and air traffic. Introduction The transition from the eighteenth to the nineteenth century was a period of great economic change in Europe. The discovery of the Watt’s steam engine (1764) enabled mechanical transport, which neither the working animals nor the natural power, on which transportation was dependent previously, could not contest. The steam engine passed the milestone in the field of transport connection. -
Prostorni Plan Uređenja Grada Crikvenice
PROSTORNI PLAN UREĐENJA GRADA CRIKVENICE T E K S T U A L N I D I O PROSTORNI PLAN UREĐENJA GRADA CRIKVENICE NARUČITELJ: PRIMORSKO-GORANSKA ŽUPANIJA GRAD CRIKVENICA Gradonačelnik: Božidar Tomašek Koordinator: Predrag Petrović, dipl.oec. IZVRŠITELJ: URBANISTICA d.o.o. Direktor: Jasminka Pilar - Katavić, dipl.ing.arh. Koordinator: Jasminka Pilar - Katavić, dipl.ing.arh. Stručni tim u izradi plana: Jasminka Pilar - Katavić, dipl.ing.arh. Ana Putar, dipl.ing.arh. Domagoj Šumanovac, ing.arh. Tihomir Viderman, dipl.ing.arh. Stručni konzultanti: Vodoopskrba i odvodnja: Rijekaprojekt - vodogradnja d.o.o. Raul Valčić, dipl.ing.građ. Nataša Slatina, dipl.ing.građ. Telekomunikacijski sustav: Milan Mataija Elektroopskrba: Lovro Matković dipl.ing.el. Plinoopskrba: Termo - plin projekt d.o.o. Damir Požgaj, dipl.ing.stroj. U R B A N I S T I C A d. o. o. Z A G R E B 3 PROSTORNI PLAN UREĐENJA GRADA CRIKVENICE SADRŽAJ: Str. Dokumentacija o tvrtki Urbanistica d.o.o. • Izvadak iz registra Trgovačkog suda u Zagrebu za tvrtku Urbanistica d.o.o. za obavljanje stručnih poslova prostornog uređenja; • Rješenje Ministarstva zaštite okoliša, prostornog uređenja i graditeljstva kojim se daje suglasnost za izradu svih prostornih planova i stručnih podloga za izdavanje lokacijskih dozvola od 20. prosinca 2006. godine); • Rješenje Hrvatske komore arhitekata i inženjera u graditeljstvu o upisu u Imenik ovlaštenih arhitekata za Jasminku Pilar - Katavić, dipl.ing.arh. od 16.studenog.1999. godine). Suglasnost: • Suglasnost Ministarstva zaštite okoliša, prostornog uređenja i graditeljstva, prema čl.45a. Zakona o prostornom uređenju ("Narodne novine", br. 30/94, 68/98, 61/00, 32/02 i 100/04), Klasa: 350-02/07-04/94, Ur.br.: 531-06-07-2. -
Challenges in Cross-Border Tourism Regions Rick Lagiewski
Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Presentations and other scholarship Faculty & Staff choS larship 2004 Challenges in cross-border tourism regions Rick Lagiewski Damon Revelas Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.rit.edu/other Recommended Citation Lagiewski, Rick and Revelas, Damon, "Challenges in cross-border tourism regions" (2004). Accessed from https://scholarworks.rit.edu/other/551 This Conference Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty & Staff choS larship at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Presentations and other scholarship by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHALLENGES IN CROSS-BORDER TOURISM REGIONS Richard “Rick” M. Lagiewski Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester, New York and Damon A. Revelas American College of Management & Technology Dubrovnik, Croatia ABSTRACT This paper examines the tourism issues related to international borders. The discussion is framed around an example of countries with strained border relations specifically Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia and Montenegro. The challenges associated with border trade in tourism and the barriers associated with collaboration between destinations are explored. Through a quantitative instrument administered to public and private tourism organizations specific micro challenges are identify for a border region in the Southern- Adriatic. Key Words: Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, Borders, Tourism, Collaboration INTRODUCTION The former Yugoslavia was a multi-ethnic state in south-east Europe divided administratively between six republics: Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, and Slovenia. Yugoslavia developed as a major destination for western tourists seeking sun, sand and sea tourism in the early 1960’s. -
Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030)
Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) Republic of Croatia MINISTRY OF THE SEA, TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 - 2030) 2nd Draft April 2017 The project is co-financed by the European Union from the European Regional Development Fund. Republic of Croatia Ministry of the Sea, Transport and Infrastructure I Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background on development of a Croatian Comprehensive National Transport Plan .................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the Transport Development Strategy (TDS 2016) ............................. 4 1.3 Revision of the TDS (2016) Ex-Ante conditionality .................................................. 4 1.4 Methodology for the development of the TDS (2016) ............................................ 5 2 Analysis .................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 General aspects of transport ................................................................................... 7 2.2 Public transport and zero-emission modes ........................................................... 34 2.3 Rail Transport......................................................................................................... 72 2.4 Road transport -
Route Evaluation Report Croatia Eurovelo 8 – Mediterranean Route
Route Evaluation Report Croatia EuroVelo 8 – Mediterranean Route MEDCYCLETOUR Project Davorin Belamarić April 27th 2018 Contents 1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Mission of the project and report objectives ................................................................. 5 1.2 Organization ................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 Brief methodological explanations ................................................................................ 8 1.3.1 Different phases of the route evaluation ................................................................ 8 1.3.2 ECS – European Certification Standard used for this evaluation ........................... 9 1.3.3 Used tools and equipment, photographs ..............................................................10 1.4 Overview of the sections .............................................................................................10 2 Infrastructure ......................................................................................................................16 2.1 Existing route infrastructure ........................................................................................16 2.1.1 Public transport ....................................................................................................19 2.2 Critical deficiencies .....................................................................................................30