DOCSLIB.ORG

Large Floods in South East Queensland, Australia: Is It Valid to Assume They Occur Randomly?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Large Floods in South East Queensland, Australia: Is It Valid to Assume They Occur Randomly? Australasian Journal of Water Resources ISSN: 1324-1583 (Print) 2204-227X (Online) Journal homepage: http://engineersaustralia.tandfonline.com/ loi/twar20 Large floods in South East Queensland, Australia: Is it valid to assume they occur randomly? Greg M. McMahon & Anthony S. Kiem To cite this article: Greg M. McMahon & Anthony S. Kiem (2018): Large floods in South East Queensland, Australia: Is it valid to assume they occur randomly?, Australasian Journal of Water Resources, DOI: 10.1080/13241583.2018.1446677 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/13241583.2018.1446677 Published online: 18 Mar 2018. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 610 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://engineersaustralia.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=twar20 AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1080/13241583.2018.1446677 Large floods in South East Queensland, Australia: Is it valid to assume they occur randomly? Greg M. McMahona and Anthony S. Kiemb aG.M. McMahon Consultants, Brisbane, Australia; bCentre for Water, Climate and Land (CWCL), Faculty of Science, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Flood frequency analysis and existing engineering practice assumes that flood events are Received 2 June 2017 randomly distributed. However, as understanding of large-scale ocean-atmospheric processes Accepted 26 February 2018 and associated hydroclimatic variability (and change) increases, the assumption that flood KEYWORDS events are random seems unlikely to be valid. This paper examines historical flood data from Non-stationarity; flood risk; 10 major catchments in South East Queensland (SEQ), Australia with the aim of testing for non- climate variability; climate random patterns in the timing of the largest flood events. The results show that most (~80%) change; flood cycles large floods in the study catchments have occurred within sets of 5-year periods separated by 35 years of lower flood risk. This finding is consistent with previous studies that have reported 20- to 40-year cycles in rainfall, flooding and drought across most of eastern Australia. Based on these insights, an explanation for the nominal 40-year cycle in SEQ flooding is proposed, and implications for describing and managing flood risk are discussed. 1. Introduction (Advisory Body Responsible Authority Review of 1.1. Background Environmental Impact Assessment Study Pine Waters Canal Estate 1983–1984), Brisbane River and its trib- The first half of the 1970s was a time of many severe floods utaries (Approvals City of Brisbane (Flood Mitigation in South East Queensland (SEQ; Figure 1) (Middelmann, Works Approval) Act 1980–1986), and Nerang River Harper, and Lacey 2000; Bureau of Meteorology 2014). (Joint Technical Steering Committee of Nerang River That decade was followed by extensive floodplain studies Flood Study 1984–1987). This experience of analysis and and development projects in the 1980s. A small group of evaluation of the hydrology of these catchments pro- engineers from Queensland Government departments, vided a regional, multi-catchment perspective to the modelling laboratories and principal consultants in hydrology of SEQ (McMahon 2011, 2012). From this Queensland steered and conducted most of these flood experience and perspective, the Roadshow engineers studies and development projects. Meeting each other noticed that three large flood events had occurred about as frequently as they did, at different river, creek and 40 years apart: estuarine communities throughout SEQ, the group came to refer to itself as ‘the Roadshow’. • February 1893, the largest on record for Brisbane Floodplain development approvals required favour- River; able recommendations from regulators in several • February 1931, the largest on record for Pine River government departments which were organised by a and also large for Brisbane River; committee set up by the former Coordinator-General’s • January 1974, the largest on record for Nerang Department. The committee system of coordinating River and also large for Brisbane River. the response by regulators to floodplain development In the 1980s, based on the idea that large floods in SEQ proposals was also used to evaluate modelling con- follow a nominal 40-year cycle with sets of 5-year period ducted by the developers and their consultants. Such of high flood risk separated by 35 years of lower flood studies and reviews included were conducted for catch- risk, some of the Roadshow speculated that: (i) the next ments including the Maroochy River (Maroochy River ‘1974 flood’ could come in 2013, plus or minus a few Flood Study Technical Supervising Committee 1980– years (McMahon 2011, 2012); (ii) there would be a Royal 1985), Mooloolah River (Mooloolah River Hydraulic Commission the next time a ‘1974 flood’ occurred; and Model Technical Committee 1976–1983), Pine River (iii) some Roadshow members would still be in practice CONTACT Anthony S. Kiem [email protected] © 2018 Engineers Australia G. M. MCMAHON AND A. S. KIEM 2 Figure 1. The SEQ study area (approximately indicated by the orange box) and the 10 catchments analysed in this study. and required to stand before such a commission. This of accredited scientific opinion, he was widely rec- Roadshow speculation was realised with large SEQ flood ognised for his successes, especially by farmers and events in January 2011 and January 2013 – with the 2011 other practitioners (http://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/ floods resulting in a Queensland Government Flood jones-inigo-owen-539). Commission of Inquiry (QFCI, www.floodcommission. The principal international hydrology textbook for qld.gov.au/). This suggests that the occurrence of large the 1970s and 1980s, Chow (1964, 8–11), mentions floods in SEQ may not be random – as is assumed in ‘periodicity’ and defines it as a regular or oscillatory existing engineering practice and floodplain develop- form of variations in hydrologic phenomena. Studies ment policies. Research conducted before and after the were quoted where technically trained professionals had 1980s Roadshow speculation reinforces the suggestion detected regular cycles in hydrological data provided to of non-randomness in flood occurrence (refer to Section them (Chow 1964, 9–46). The 11-year sunspot cycle was 1.2 for further details). the only cycle that enjoyed some acceptance regarding an explanation for this periodicity, but Chow (1964, 40–46) 1.2. History stated that quantitative investigations into the relation- ships between sunspot cycles and this hydrological peri- Given scientific understanding and engineering meth- odicity failed to demonstrate any statistical significance. odology and guidelines in the 1980s, thinking a hydro- Whether this means that there is no causal relationship meteorological phenomenon like flooding could be between sunspot cycles and hydroclimatic variability on non-random may have seemed radical at worst or unu- Earth, or that the statistical testing methods used were sual at best. So, was the Roadshow alone in its idea of inadequate, remains an open research question (Franks physically based regularity of large SEQ flooding? 2002; Gray et al. 2010; Kiem 2014). Despite the physical Clement Wragge (1852–1922), commonly regarded mechanisms and causal relationships being a matter of as an eccentric polymath, set up an extensive network controversy (a scientific debate which continues today), of weather stations around Queensland in the 1880s Chow (1964) accepts that the occurrence of hydrologic and 1890s. Using data from these weather stations, and extremes is not random, quoting the work of Hurst, training provided by Wragge, Inigo Jones (1872–1954) Black, and Simaika (1965) on the 1300 year (622–1921 developed long-term weather forecasts based on the 11- A.D.) Nile River flood record. Hurst, Black, and Simaika and 22-year sunspot cycles. Regarding flooding, Jones (1965) noted that both wet and dry years appeared to (1931) followed the Bruckner Cycle for solar activities, occur in groups. which he determined to be 35 years long, but which has In Australia, John Ward and colleagues, from the then since been found to vary from 35 to 45 years (Raspopov Queensland Irrigation and Water Supply Commission, et al. 2000). Although Jones failed to have his methods recognised the statistical difference between large and recognised as soundly based by any substantial body common floods in Queensland and supposed there AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES 3 would be a physical driver (or drivers) for this (Ward and and Verdon 2006; Micevski, Franks, and Kuczera 2006; Harman 1972). John Ward also argued that flood fre- Kiem and Verdon-Kidd 2013; Stevens and Kiem 2014; quency distributions at a location differ because higher Verdon-Kidd and Kiem 2015) and drought risk (Kiem flows originate from a variety of different rainfall mech- and Franks 2004; Verdon-Kidd and Kiem 2009; Kiem anisms – at the time, minimal insight was available into et al. 2016). Klingaman (2012) focused specifically on what those different rainfall mechanisms were. More large-scale climate processes that influence rainfall in recent work by Klingaman (2012) provides comprehen- Queensland and explained that ENSO, IPO and the sive details on rainfall mechanisms for Queensland (see Madden-Julien Oscillation were most important but that Figure 2) and as such (i) provides useful insights into they operate on different temporal scales as illustrated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 40736 Waterways and Coastal Management Strategy 2011
    Section 7 Maps Sunshine Coast Waterways and Coastal Management Strategy 2011-2021 53 54 andCoastal ManagementStrategy2011-2021 Sunshine CoastWaterways Map 7.1 Sunshine Coast Catchments Major Catchments Noosa River Maroochy River Pumicestone Passage Sunshine Coast Catchments Mary River Stanley River Mooloolah River Water Bodies (see note) Watercourses (Order 5-8) 02461 km 1:220,000 Note A comprehensive map of constructed water bodies under Council management will be developed during implementation of the Strategy. Lake Document Path: W:\Common\Geo\Projects\140140_Strategy_Amendments\Maps\Waterways_Strategy\Map7_1_MajorCatchments_20141110_LK007 Data Source Weyba All catchment, stream and waterbodies datasets internal to the Sunshine Coast Council boundary have been derived by the Sunshine Coast Council. Catchment and stream datasets external to the Sunshine Coast Council boundary is a combination of Sunshine Coast Council and the Department of Environment and Resource Management datasets Disclaimer While every care is taken to ensure the accuracy of this product, neither the Sunshine Coast Council nor the State of Queensland makes any representations or warranties about its accuracy, reliability, completeness or suitability for any particular purpose and disclaims all responsibility and all liability (including without limitation, liability in negligence) for all expenses, losses, damages (including indirect or consequential damage) and costs that may occur as a result of the product being inaccurate or incomplete Eumundi in any way or
    [Show full text]
  • Restricted Water Ski Areas in Queensland
    Restricted Water Ski areas in Queensland Watercourse Date of Gazettal Any person operating a ship towing anyone by a line attached to the ship (including for example a person water skiing or riding on a toboggan or tube) within the waters listed below endangers marine safety. Brisbane River 20/10/2006 South Brisbane and Town Reaches of the Brisbane River between the Merivale Bridge and the Story Bridge. Burdekin River, Charters Towers 13/09/2019 All waters of The Weir on the Burdekin River, Charters Towers. Except: • commencing at a point on the waterline of the eastern bank of the Burdekin River nearest to location 19°55.279’S, 146°16.639’E, • then generally southerly along the waterline of the eastern bank to a point nearest to location 19°56.530’S, 146°17.276’E, • then westerly across Burdekin River to a point on the waterline of the western bank nearest to location 19°56.600’S, 146°17.164’E, • then generally northerly along the waterline of the western bank to a point on the waterline nearest to location 19°55.280’S, 146°16.525’E, • then easterly across the Burdekin River to the point of commencement. As shown on the map S8sp-73 prepared by Maritime Safety Queensland (MSQ) which can be found on the MSQ website at www.msq.qld.gov.au/s8sp73map and is held at MSQ’s Townsville Office. Burrum River .12/07/1996 The waters of the Burrum River within 200 metres north from the High Water mark of the southern river bank and commencing at a point 50 metres downstream of the public boat ramp off Burrum Heads Road to a point 200 metres upstream of the upstream boundary of Lions Park, Burrum Heads.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Networked Artificial Islands and Finger Island Canal Estates on Australia’S Gold Coast
    Absolute Waterfrontage: Road Networked Artificial Islands and Finger Island Canal Estates on Australia’s Gold Coast Philip Hayward Kagoshima University Research Center for the Pacific Islands, University of Technology Sydney, & Southern Cross University, Lismore [email protected] Christian Fleury University of Caen, Normandy [email protected] Abstract: The Gold Coast, an urban conurbation stretching along the Pacific seaboard and adjacent hinterland of south east Queensland, has developed rapidly since the 1950s. Much of its development has involved the modification of existing watercourses so as to produce stable areas of land suitable for medium and high density development. This article addresses one particular facet of this, the development of artificial islands and of estates of ‘finger islands’ (narrow, peninsular areas with direct waterfrontage) and the canalised waterways that facilitate them. The article commences with a discussion of the concepts behind such developments and the nomenclature that has accrued to them, highlighting the contradictions between branding of finger island estates and the actualities of their realisation. This discussion is supported by historical reference to earlier artificial island estates in Florida that provided a model for Australian developers. Case studies of three specific Gold Coast waterfront locations conclude the main body of the article, reflecting on factors related to the stability of their community environments. Keywords: Canal estates, finger islands, Florida, Gold Coast, island cities, shima, waterfront development © 2016 Philip Hayward & Christian Fleury Island Dynamics, Denmark - http://www.urbanislandstudies.org This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Hayward, P., & Fleury, C.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Ambient Network (Water Quality) 2020-21
    Surface Water Ambient Network (Water Quality) 2020-21 July 2020 This publication has been compiled by Natural Resources Divisional Support, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy. © State of Queensland, 2020 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Summary This document lists the stream gauging stations which make up the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy (DNRME) surface water quality monitoring network. Data collected under this network are published on DNRME’s Water Monitoring Information Data Portal. The water quality data collected includes both logged time-series and manual water samples taken for later laboratory analysis. Other data types are also collected at stream gauging stations, including rainfall and stream height. Further information is available on the Water Monitoring Information Data Portal under each station listing.
    [Show full text]
  • Queensland Water Quality Guidelines 2009
    Queensland Water Quality Guidelines 2009 Prepared by: Environmental Policy and Planning, Department of Environment and Heritage Protection © State of Queensland, 2013. Re-published in July 2013 to reflect machinery-of-government changes, (departmental names, web addresses, accessing datasets), and updated reference sources. No changes have been made to water quality guidelines. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. For more information on this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Disclaimer This document has been prepared with all due diligence and care, based on the best available information at the time of publication. The department holds no responsibility for any errors or omissions within this document. Any decisions made by other parties based on this document are solely the responsibility of those parties. Information contained in this document is from a number of sources and, as such, does not necessarily represent government or departmental policy. If you need to access this document in a language other than English, please call the Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS National) on 131 450 and ask them to telephone Library Services on +61 7 3170 5470. This publication can be made available in an alternative format (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • 40736 Waterways and Coastal Management Strategy 2011
    Sunshine Coast Waterways and Coastal Management Strategy 2011-2021 August 2014 edition Our waterways - valued, healthy, enjoyed. For further information www.sunshinecoast.qld.gov.au (07) 5475 7272 Sunshine Coast Council™ is a registered trademark of Sunshine Coast Regional Council. © Sunshine Coast Regional Council 2009-current. Adopted by Council February 2011. Revised August 2014, due to Sunshine Coast Local Government Area boundary amendments. Acknowledgements Sunshine Coast Regional Council acknowledges the Traditional Owners of land across the Sunshine Coast and recognises their rich culture and intrinsic connection to the land and sea that stretches back over thousands of years. Council also wishes to thank all interested stakeholders for their valuable contributions towards the development of the Sunshine Coast Waterways and Coastal Management Strategy 2011–2021. Disclaimer Information contained in this document is based on available information at the time of writing. All figures and diagrams are indicative only and should be referred to as such. This is a strategic document which deals with technical matters in a summary way only. Council or its officers accept no responsibility for any loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from acting in reliance upon any material contained in this document. 2 Sunshine Coast Waterways and Coastal Management Strategy 2011-2021 Table of contents 1 Executive Summary 44 Challenges 26 2 Background 8 4.1 Accommodating population 28 2.1 Waterways and coastal 10 growth and demand foreshores
    [Show full text]
  • Healthy Waterways-Healthy Dolphins Project Report 2019
    Healthy Waterways-Healthy Dolphins Project Report 2019 Healthy Waterways-Healthy Dolphins Project Report 2019 Healthy Waterways-Healthy Dolphins Project Report 2019 Acknowledgements We would like to thank our dedicated team of volunteers and Dolphin Ambassadors, particularly Heather Pheloung, Christian Jaehnichen, Mia Gustavsson, Tammy Brown and Jess Tsitonakis. Thanks and gratitude to our project partners, the City of the Gold Coast, Tweed Shire Council and Gold Coast Marine Training and Out of the Blue Adventures for making this project possible. We also thank the City of the Gold Coast, Wettenhall Environment Trust and our Crowdfunding donors for their funding assistance. Very special thanks to Andrew McCauley, Dean Fox, Kris Boody, Heidi van Woerden, Chels Marshall and David Blyde. Thanks to the many Dolphin Ambassador volunteers who have assisted in the project. This research was conducted under New South Wales National Parks Permits, Queensland Department of Environment & Science Permits, Moreton Bay Marine Parks Permit and NSW Department of Primary Industry Animal Ethics Permits. This Report should be cited as: Hawkins, E. R. (2019) Healthy Waterways-Healthy Dolphins Project Report 2019, Dolphin Research Australia Inc. Image Credits: Dolphin Research Australia Inc. 1 Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................... 1 SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Line Wt Angler Club Location Area Date Amberjack 3 1.750 A
    SPORTFISHING - JUNIOR Species Line Wt Angler Club Location Area Date Amberjack 3 1.750 A. Henderson Brisbane Moreton Bay Brisbane 20/11/1977 Amberjack 6 5.800 N. Monteith Brisbane Cape Moreton Brisbane 18/07/1982 Amberjack 10 8.100 D. Easton Gold Coast Cook Island Gold Coast 27/03/1989 Barracuda (Great) 4 7.620 B. Hart Cairns Cairns Cairns 7/05/1989 Barracuda (Great) 6 10.100 C. Hoult Bundaberg 4 Mile Reef Bundaberg 4/01/1994 Barracuda (Great) 10 9.900 M. Beighton Bribie Island Flinders Reef Brisbane 24/02/1986 Barracuda (Pickhandle) 1 1.580 G. Hart Cairns Cairns Cairns 26/04/1982 Barracuda (Pickhandle) 2 6.090 D. Hoare Cairns Cairns Inlet Cairns 30/11/1989 Barracuda (Pickhandle) 3 6.900 K. Lomman Army Townsville Middle Reef Townsville 25/10/1997 Barracuda (Pickhandle) 6 8.490 R. Weir Cairns Cairns Cairns 28/07/1973 Barramundi 1 2.800 G. Smith Cardwell Hinchinbrook Is Cardwell 10/06/2006 Barramundi 2 8.810 M. Popiol Cardwell Hinchinbrook Ch Cardwell 19/02/2006 Barramundi 3 12.000 L. Cook Keppel Bay Corio Bay Corio Bay 5/02/2006 Barramundi 4 9.050 T. Head Weipa Weipa Weipa 7/11/2002 Bass (Australian) 1 2.514 B. Iseppi Bundaberg Burnett River Bundaberg 29/09/2011 Bass (Australian) 2 2.340 T. Schultz SECTAR Stanley River Brisbane 16/11/1996 Bass (Australian) 4 2.300 J. Kieboom Brisbane Byangum NSW 27/09/1999 Batfish (Narrow Banded) 2 1.370 J. Kraut Bundaberg 4 Mile Reef Bundaberg 20/01/1989 Batfish (Teira ) 4 8.490 G.
    [Show full text]
  • GUIDE FOR... Anchoring, Mooring and Grounding Restrictions
    GUIDE FOR... Anchoring, Mooring and Grounding Restrictions RULES APPLY TO ANCHORING IN GOLD COAST WATERWAYS… Why Limit Anchoring? There are time limits for anchoring in some Gold Coast waters that are in particularly high demand. This operates like parking restrictions for vehicles in city centres or camping restrictions in national parks. Limits are needed so that everyone gets a fair go at anchoring in the most sought after locations. The map on the reverse side shows certain prohibited areas and other restrictions. Following is a summary of these rules. Anchoring and mooring boats is restricted to 24 hours on most rivers, creeks and canals and to seven days in most parts of the Broadwater. Anchoring and mooring time restrictions do not apply to boats moored to an approved buoy mooring, jetty or pontoon if you own it or have permission to use it. Anchoring or mooring boats within 30 metres of a buoy mooring, jetty or pontoon whether occupied or not, is prohibited. These rules are enforceable under the Transport Infrastructure (Waterways Management) Regulation 2012. Enforcement agencies can issue on the spot fines for breaches of these rules. For more information please contact Gold Coast Waterways Authority: 40-44 Seaworld Drive Main Beach | Phone: 07 5539 7350 | Email: [email protected] | Like us Other useful contacts: Maritime Safety Queensland Boating and Queensland Queensland Fisheries Patrol Water Police 40-44 Seaworld Drive 40-44 Seaworld Drive 40-44 Seaworld Drive Main Beach Main Beach Main Beach Ph: 07 5585 1811 Ph: 07 5583 5500 Ph: 07 5509 5700 40-44 Seaworld Drive Main Beach Qld 4217 P: 07 5539 7350 [email protected] gcwa.qld.gov.au North Stradbroke Island Steiglitz THE BROADWATER Refer to Moreton Bay South Marine Park for rules Stradbroke in this area Island Boundary of Regulations 24 HOUR ANCHORING WATERS Sovereign A 24 hour anchoring and mooring limit in any 30 day period Islands applies within these (green) areas.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2053 South Queensland Flood
    THE 2053 SOUTH QUEENSLAND FLOOD Only Young Water Professionals Need Attend ABSTRACT A ‘roadshow’ of flood engineers in the early 1980s ‘prophesised’ the flooding that occurred in South East Queensland (SE QLD) during 2011 to 2015. The events of 2011 to 2015 may have given increased credibility to a long-held notion that SE QLD may be subject to a 40-year flood cycle. This paper examines the data on flooding within the ten major SE QLD catchments, bounded by three mountain ranges and comprising more than 63,000 km2. The purpose was to test the existence and the strength of any regularity to flooding in this well-populated region of Australia. The approach identifies the flooding that occurred during predetermined five-year periods that were 35 years apart – the 40-year cycle – and the flooding that occurred outside of these nominated 5-year periods. The basic statistics were weighted for the length of flood record, catchment area, ranking of flood, and a combination of these factors. The results indicate that 69-87% of major floods in SE QLD have occurred within a set of five-year periods exactly 35 years apart. No explanation is offered at this stage of the research. The implications for traditional hydrologic methods are outlined. Keywords: Flooding, flood cycles, regularity, flood frequency INTRODUCTION The early years of the 1970s in South East Queensland was a period of multiple flooding events, remembered mostly for the January 1974 flooding of Brisbane. The following decade was one that experienced widespread estuarine development, where State and Local Government concerns that the development be above the 1in100AEP flood on top of a cyclonic surge, with allowance for future water level rises due to global climatic change, engaged a community of engineers who specialised in relevant fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Nerang River Environmental Values and Water Quality Objectives Basin No
    Environmental Protection (Water) Policy 2009 Nerang River environmental values and water quality objectives Basin No. 146 (part), including all tributaries of Nerang River July 2010 Prepared by: Water Quality & Ecosystem Health Policy Unit Department of Environment and Resource Management © State of Queensland (Department of Environment and Resource Management) 2010 The Department of Environment and Resource Management authorises the reproduction of textual material, whole or part, in any form, provided appropriate acknowledgement is given. This publication is available in alternative formats (including large print and audiotape) on request. Contact (07) 322 48412 or email <[email protected]> July 2010 Document Ref Number Main parts of this document and what they contain • Scope of waters covered Introduction • Key terms / how to use document (section 1) • Links to WQ plan (map) • Mapping / water type information • Further contact details • Amendment provisions • Source of EVs for this document Environmental Values • Table of EVs by waterway (EVs - section 2) - aquatic ecosystem - human use • Any applicable management goals to support EVs • How to establish WQOs to protect Water Quality Objectives all selected EVs (WQOs - section 3) • WQOs in this document, for - aquatic ecosystem EV - human use EVs • List of plans, reports etc containing Ways to improve management actions relevant to the water quality waterways in this area (section 4) • Definitions of key terms including an Dictionary explanation table of all (section 5) environmental values • An accompanying map that shows Accompanying WQ Plan water types, levels of protection and (map) other information contained in this document iii CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 WATERS TO WHICH THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mcmahon__Greg.Pdf
    SUBMISSION TO QUEENSLAND FLOODS COMMISSION OF INQUIRY By Greg McMahon 11 March 2011 2 TERMS OF REFERENCE UNDER the provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry Act 1950, Her Excellency the Governor, acting by and with the advice of the Executive Council, hereby appoints the Honourable Justice Catherine Holmes to make full and careful inquiry in an open and independent manner with respect to the following matters:- a) the preparation and planning by federal, state and local governments; emergency services and the community for the 2010/2011 floods in Queensland, b) the performance of private insurers in meeting their claims responsibilities, c) all aspects of the response to the 2010/2011 flood events, particularly measures taken to inform the community and measures to protect life and private and public property, including immediate management, response and recovery resourcing, overall coordination and deployment of personnel and equipment adequacy of equipment and communications systems; and the adequacy of the community‘s response. d) the measures to manage the supply of essential services such as power, water and communications during the 2010/2011 flood events, e) adequacy of forecasts and early warning systems particularly as they related to the flooding events in Toowoomba, and the Lockyer and Brisbane Valleys, f) implementation of the systems operation plans for dams across the state and in particular the Wivenhoe and Somerset release strategy and an assessment of compliance with, and the suitability of the operational procedures relating to flood mitigation and dam safety, g) all aspects of land use planning through local and regional planning systems to minimise infrastructure and property impacts from floods, h) in undertaking its inquiries, the Commission is required to: take into account the regional and geographic differences across affected communities; and seek public submissions and hold public hearings in affected communities.
    [Show full text]