DOCSLIB.ORG

Investment Banking Mergers & Acquisitions Corporate Finance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Investment Banking Mergers & Acquisitions Corporate Finance SCOOPBOOKS THE PRACTITIONER'S GUIDE TO INVESTMENT BANKING MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS CORPORATE FINANCE Jerilyn J. Castillo and Peter J. McAniff circinus Business press CONTENTS Commonly Used Acronyms i Foreword iii Introduction vii PART I: THE BASICS 1 Chapter 1 Investment Banking 3 Advisory vs. Raising Capital 5 Strategic Planning vs. Financial Management 6 Confidential Information 7 A Career in Banking 8 Chapter 2 Corporate Finance Basics 11 Time Value of Money 11 Why is Time Value of Money Important? 13 What is an Investment 14 Present Value and Future Value - Conceptually 15 Risk vs. Reward 19 Discount Rate and Interest Rate 21 Present Value and Future Value - Numerical Examples 21 Net Present Value 27 Internal Rate of Return 29 Multiple Payments in a Compounding Period 30 Annuities and Perpetuities 32 Valuing a Bond 34 Chapter 3 Financial Statement Basics 39 Financial Accounting Basics 40 Basic Financial Concepts 43 Creating the Cash Flow Statement 54 Financial Ratios and Terminology 59 Market Value of Equity 59 Shares Outstanding, Options and Converts 60 Total Debt and Net Debt 64 Enterprise Value 64 Earnings per Share 66 Key Multiples and Metrics 68 Chapter 4 Strategic Transactions 73 Strategic Planning 73 Strategic and Financing Transactions 74 Buy vs. Build 75 Strategic Rationale 76 Increasing Shareholder Value 77 Synergies 81 Chapter 5 Introduction to M&A 89 Types of Strategic Transactions 89 Buy-Side vs. Sell-Side 92 The Sell-Side Process 94 The Deal Process 96 Chapter 6 Analyzing Strategic Transactions 103 Strategic Rationale Analysis 104 Valuation Analysis 104 Financial Impact Analysis 107 Social Issues Analysis 109 Constituents Analysis 110 Chapter 7 Screening for M&A Transactions 113 Initial Screening 113 Common Screening Errors 116 Checklist and Review 117 PART II: VALUATION 119 Chapter 8 The Role of Valuation 121 Value is Relative 121 Valuation Methods 123 Multiples Based Methods 124 Cash Flow Based Methods 126 Breakup Analysis 128 Valuation Ranges 128 Chapter 9 Comparable Company Analysis 131 Key Benefits 132 Key Challenges 132 When to Use Trading Comparables 133 Preparing Trading Comparables 133 Additional Pointers 136 Developing Trading Comparables 140 Reading Trading Comparables 144 Drawing Valuation Conclusions 147 Chapter 10 Comparable Transaction Analysis 151 The Control Premium 151 Key Benefits 152 Key Challenges 153 Identifying Transaction Comparables 153 Reading Deal Announcements 155 Developing Transaction Comparables 158 Additional Pointers 170 Chapter 11 Discounted Cash Flow Analysis 171 Key Benefits 172 Key Challenges 172 Key Components 173 Unlevered Free Cash Flow 177 Common Errors in Calculating Free Cash Flow 180 Weighted Average Cost of Capital 181 Terminal Value 186 Common Errors in Calculating Terminal Value 190 Midyear Convention 192 Checking a DCF Model 197 Comprehensive DCF Analysis Example 198 Chapter 12 Leveraged Buyout Analysis 201 LBO Analysis 203 Key Components 204 Simplified LBO Analysis 207 Returns on Private Equity Investments 227 Traditional LBO Candidates , 227 Screening for LBO Candidates \ 229 Participants in an LBO 230 Structure of a Private Equity Firm 233 How Financial Sponsors are Compensated 235 Clawbacks 238 Chapter 13 Breakup Analysis 251 Developing Breakup Analysis 252 PART III: M&A ANALYSIS 255 Chapter 14 Accretion/Dilution Analysis 257 Why Perform Accretion/Dilution Analysis? 258 Basic Principles 259 Accounting Treatments 267 Consolidation Method 270 Step-by-Step Accretion/Dilution 275 Growth Rate Analysis 307 Equity Method 308 Cost and Available-for-Sale Methods 312 Chapter 15 Acquisition Currency 517 Cash vs. Stock Consideration 319 100 Percent Cash Consideration 320 100 Percent Stock Consideration 322 Cash/Stock Combinations 324 Is Equity Ever Cheaper than Debt? 325 Ownership Dilution 328 Acquisition Finance 330 Chapter 16 Stock Deals 331 Exchange Ratios 333 Fixed Exchange Ratio 336 Floating Exchange Ratio 340 Collars, Caps and Floors 344 Risk Arbitrage 347 Chapter 17 Other M&A Analyses 355 Shareholder Analysis 355 Technical Market Analysis 359 Relative Valuation Analysis 364 Social Issues Analysis 367 Chapter 18 Merger of Equals (MOE) 369 Key Features of a Merger of Equals 369 Splitting the New Company Equity 370 Financial Analysis in an MOE 374 Contribution Analysis 375 Historical Natural Exchange Ratios 377 Valuation Analysis and MOEs 378 Governance and Other Issues 379 Negotiating an MOE 380 PART IV: TRANSACTION STRUCTURING 383 Chapter 19 The Deal Team 385 Confidential Information 385 Participants in the Transaction 386 Fiduciary Duties of the Board of Directors 390 Chapter 20 Deal Mechanics 393 Due Diligence 393 Due Diligence Objectives 395 Due Diligence Planning 399 Areas of Due Diligence 400 The Legal Agreement 402 Deal Protection 411 Public vs. Private Agreements 413 Corporate Acquisitions 415 Merger Transactions 416 Tender Offers 419 Proxy Contests 428 Cross-Border Transactions 429 Chapter 21 Taxes and M&A 431 What is Tax? 432 Book vs. Tax Accounting 433 Issues Related to Depreciation 435 Deferred Taxes 438 Effective Tax Rates 449 Tax Shields 450 Taxable Income and Taxable Gain 451 Book Value vs. Tax Basis 457 Inside Basis vs. Outside Basis 458 Net Operating Losses (NOLs) and Capital Losses 462 Acquired NOLs 466 Tax Credits 468 Shareholder-Level and Corporate-Level Tax 470 Selling Stock vs. Selling Assets - Tax Issues 471 Selling Stock vs. Selling Assets - Non-Tax Issues 474 Asset Write-Ups 474 Basis Step-Ups 478 GAAP Accounting for M&A Transactions 481 Tax-Free Reorganizations 493 338(h)(10) Election 501 Chapter 22 Corporate Restructurings 507' Purpose of a Corporate Restructuring 507 Public vs. Private Market Separation 510 Public and Private Market Separation Techniques 512 IPO and/or Public Sale of Equity 514 Spin-off 516 Split-off 518 Tracking, Targeted or Letter Stock 520 Sale of Subsidiary for Cash 522 Sale of Subsidiary for Stock 524 Joint Venture and Partnership 526 Stock/Asset Swap 528 Financial Restructuring 530 Chapter 23 Corporate Defense 535 Purpose of Corporate Defense 535 State Statutes and Delaware 536 When a Hostile Situation Emerges 537 Public Relations 539 Implementing Structural Defenses 540 Structural Defenses 540 "Vote" Related Defenses 542 "Value" Related Defenses 544 "Board" Related Defenses 545 Delaware-Specific Protections 546 Shareholder Rights Plan (Poison Pill) 546 Flip-in Rights Plan 549 Flip-in Exchange Rights Plan 553 Flip-over Rights Plan 555 PART V: CREDIT AND FINANCING 561 Chapter 24 Credit Analysis 563 Capital Structure 563 Credit Analysis 566 Quantifying Credit Risk 567 Credit Risk Indicators 570 Rating Agencies 572 Ratings and Rating Scales 574 Credit Ratios 578 Calculation of Credit Ratios 582 Credit Rating Notching 587 Calculating Debt Capacity 590 Changes in Credit Risk 592 Private Companies 593 Chapter 25 Sources of Capital 595 The Capital Markets Group 595 Liquidation Preference 595 Financing Glossary Terms 599 Sources of Capital 607 Short-Term Debt 609 Senior Long-Term Debt 611 Subordinated Debt 618 Preferred Equity 618 Common Equity 619 Public vs. Private Capital 620 Private Placements 620 Financial Sponsors 622 Registration of Public Securities 622 Investors 624 Managing Risk with Derivatives 625 Liability Management 626 Acknowledgments 629 Appendix A List of Investment Banks 643 Appendix B Glossary of Terms 649 Appendix C Suggested Reading and Other Resources 707 Index 711 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assessing the Effectiveness and Impact of Central Bank and Supervisory Policies in Greening the Financial System
    INSPIRE Theme 6 Assessing the effectiveness and impact of central bank and supervisory policies in greening the financial system Overview of the projects funded under the third call for research proposals September 2020 PROJECT Energy transition intersectoral dependencies under different monetary and supervisory policy scenarios Moutaz Altaghlibi a and Rens van Tilberga a Sustainable Finance Lab, Utrecht University, The Netherlands As we transition our economies to a low carbon path, climate related transition risks to the financial sector pose a challenge to policy makers in their policy design. The unprecedented climate challenge requires the use and the development of new tools in order to quantify these risks and investigate the role of different policies to steer the transition in the right direction. Central banks and financial regulators can play an essential role in facilitating a successful transition by directing the funds needed to achieve this transition in the right direction and in a timely manner. However, any intervention by central banks should be evaluated across sectors and across scenarios in order to guarantee the effectiveness, efficiency and coherence with fiscal policies. Our methodology is scenario analysis based on a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model. Our CGE model allows us to capture feedback loops across sectors, along with tracking the change in prices and quantities following an exogenous change in policies, technologies, or consumer preferences. Moreover, in order to capture both risks and opportunities associated to the transition process, our model distinguishes between green and grey sub-sectors. It also uses sector-specific capital stocks which allows us to differentiate the cost of capital across sectors/scenarios.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Brokerage Commissions to Secure IPO Allocations1
    Working Paper No. 4/2010 Using Brokerage Commissions to November 2010 Secure IPO Allocations Sturla Lyngnes Fjesme, Roni Michaely and Øyvind Norli © Sturla Lyngnes Fjesme, Roni Michaely and Øyvind Norli 2011. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission, provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. This paper can be downloaded without charge from the CCGR website http://www.bi.no/ccgr 1 Using Brokerage Commissions to Secure IPO Allocations1 . Sturla Lyngnes Fjesme2 The Norwegian School of Management (BI) . Roni Michaely Cornell University and the Interdisciplinary Center . Øyvind Norli The Norwegian School of Management (BI) November 11, 2011 JEL classification: G24; G28 Keywords: IPO allocations; Equity issue; Commission; Rent seeking 1 We are grateful to Jay Ritter, Øyvind Bøhren, François Derrien, seminar participants at the Norwegian School of Management for valuable suggestions, “The Center for Corporate Governance Research (CCGR)”at the Norwegian School of Management for financial support, the Oslo Stock Exchange VPS for providing the data and the investment banks and companies that helped us locate the listing prospectuses. All errors are our own. 2 The Norwegian School of Management (BI), Nydalsveien 37, 0484 Oslo, Norway. E-mail address: [email protected] Telephone: 607-793-6911. 2 Abstract Using data, at the investor level, on the allocations of shares in initial public offerings (IPOs), we document a strong positive relationship between the amount of stock-trading commission and the number of shares an investor receives in a subsequent IPO. We find no evidence to support the idea that investment banks allocate shares to investors that are perceived to be long-term investors.
    [Show full text]
  • The CEO's Guide to Corporate Finance
    CORPORATE FINANCE PRACTICE The CEO’s guide to corporate finance Richard Dobbs, Bill Huyett, and Tim Koller Artwork by Daniel Bejar Four principles can help you make great financial decisions— even when the CFO’s not in the room. The problem Strategic decisions can be com- plicated by competing, often spurious notions of what creates value. Even executives with solid instincts can be seduced by the allure of financial engineering, high leverage, or the idea that well-established rules of eco- nomics no longer apply. Why it matters Such misconceptions can undermine strategic decision making and slow down economies. What you should do about it Test decisions such as whether to undertake acquisitions, make dives- titures, invest in projects, or increase executive compensation against four enduring principles of corporate finance. Doing so will often require managers to adopt new practices, such as justifying mergers on the basis of their impact on cash flows rather than on earnings per share, holding regular business exit reviews, focusing on enterprise-wide risks that may lurk within individual projects, and indexing executive compensation to the growth and market performance of peer companies. 3 The CEO’s guide to corporate finance It’s one thing for a CFO to understand the technical methods of valuation—and for members of the finance organization to apply them to help line managers monitor and improve company performance. But it’s still more powerful when CEOs, board members, and other non- financial executives internalize the principles of value creation. Doing so allows them to make independent, courageous, and even un- popular business decisions in the face of myths and misconceptions about what creates value.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Universal Banks Better Underwriters? Evidence from the Last Days of the Glass-Steagall Act
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Focarelli, Dario; Marqués-Ibáñez, David; Pozzolo, Alberto Franco Working Paper Are universal banks better underwriters? Evidence from the last days of the Glass-Steagall Act ECB Working Paper, No. 1287 Provided in Cooperation with: European Central Bank (ECB) Suggested Citation: Focarelli, Dario; Marqués-Ibáñez, David; Pozzolo, Alberto Franco (2011) : Are universal banks better underwriters? Evidence from the last days of the Glass-Steagall Act, ECB Working Paper, No. 1287, European Central Bank (ECB), Frankfurt a. M. This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/153721 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten
    [Show full text]
  • Outside Financing Capacity
    Introduction Tirole’s Simple Credit Rationing Model Equity Multiplier Theory of Standard Debt Contracts Basic Assumptions (1) An entrepreneur (borrower). An investment project requiring fixed investment I. The entrepreneur has cash on hand (or liquid securities) A < I. To implement the project the entrepreneur needs (borrows) I − A. Robert J. Gary-Bobo Introduction Tirole’s Simple Credit Rationing Model Equity Multiplier Theory of Standard Debt Contracts Basic Assumptions (2) If undertaken the project either succeeds: verifiable income R > 0. Or the project fails: yields zero income. Let p denote the probability of success. The project is subject to moral hazard. Robert J. Gary-Bobo Introduction Tirole’s Simple Credit Rationing Model Equity Multiplier Theory of Standard Debt Contracts Basic Assumptions(3) The entrepreneur can exert high effort (work, take no private benefit), or zero effort (shirk, take a private benefit). Equivalently, the entrepreneur chooses between project with high or low probability of success. High effort yields p = pH ; low effort yields p = pL, with pL < pH . Denote ∆p = pH − pL. Low effort yields a private benefit B > 0 to the entrepreneur. (B can be interpreted as a disutility of effort). Robert J. Gary-Bobo Introduction Tirole’s Simple Credit Rationing Model Equity Multiplier Theory of Standard Debt Contracts Basic Assumptions (4) Borrower and lenders (investors) are risk-neutral. For simplicity, there is no time preference: investors require an interest rate equal to 0 (at least). The entrepreneur is protected by limited liability (income cannot be negative). Competition among lenders drive interest and profit to zero. Robert J. Gary-Bobo Introduction Tirole’s Simple Credit Rationing Model Equity Multiplier Theory of Standard Debt Contracts Basic Assumptions(5) The loan contract specifies how the profit is shared between borrower and lenders.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Banking and Security Market Development: Does Finance
    Investment Banking and Security Market Development: Does Finance Follow Industry?∗ Bharat N. Anand† Alexander Galetovic‡ Harvard University Universidad de Chile February 2001 Abstract This paper looks at the industrial organization of the investment banking industry. Long- term relationships between business firms and investment banks are pervasive in developed security markets. A vast literature argues that better monitoring and information result from relationships. Thus, security markets should allocate resources better when an investment bank- ing industry exists. We study necessary conditions for sustainable relationships and then explore whether policy can do something to foster them. We argue that the structure of investment banking is determined by the economics of the technology of relationships: (i) Sunk set up cost to establish a relationship. (ii) The firm pays the investment bank only when it does a deal. (iii) To a significant degree the investment bank cannot prevent other banks from free riding on the information created by the relationship. Then: (a) Relationships can emerge in equilibrium only if the industry is an oligopoly of large investment banks with similar market shares. (b) Relationships are for large firms–small firms are rationed out of relationships by investment banks. (c) Scale economies due to entry costs are irrelevant when the market is large but can prevent an industry from emerging when the market is small. While policy can probably remove obstacles that increase the costs of relationships, the size- distribution of business firms determines whether an investment banking industry is feasible: it will not emerge if large firms are few. In this sense, “finance follows industry.” Large firms can escape this limitation by listing in foreign developed security markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Swiss Biotech Report 2015
    Swiss Biotech Report 2015 Impressum Steering committee Domenico Alexakis, Swiss Biotech Association, Zürich Seraina Benz, SIX Swiss Exchange AG, Zürich Oreste Ghisalba, CTI, Bern Jan Lucht, scienceindustries, Zürich Liv Minder, Switzerland Global Enterprise, Zürich Heinz Müller, Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property, Bern Swiss National Science Foundation, Bern Andrea von Bartenwerffer, SIX Swiss Exchange AG, Zürich Jürg Zürcher, Ernst & Young AG, Basel Further partners Daniel Gygax, biotechnet, Muttenz Concept, layout and design sherif ademi | kommunikationsdesign, Schlieren Scan the QR code to download the Swiss Biotech Report 2015. www.swissbiotechreport.ch Publicly traded Swiss biotech companies 3500 in CHF million 3061 2918 2012 3000 2843 2013 2014 2500 2064 1955 Source: Annual Reports, 2000 1852 website information and EY 1500 1000 728 691 678 525 500 374 233 0 –500 Revenues R&D expenses Profits/losses Liquidity Privately held Swiss biotech companies 2500 in CHF million 2012 2000 2013 1799 1826 1824 2014 1500 Source: EY 1000 848 725 673 650 606 602 500 –68 –63 –98 0 Revenues R&D expenses Profits/losses Liquidity –500 Cover Picture: Picture courtesy of Jürg Zürcher © View from Schynige Platte on “Ussri Sägissa” and “Winteregg”. 31 Table of contents Editorial 4 International relationships – Made in Switzerland 5 International cooperation a prerequisite to research 7 Switzerland 2i – innovation and internationalism 8 Short outline of CTI’s national and international activities 9 Patent literature reflects international focus of Swiss biotech 11 Global network and local production drive success 13 Switzerland: strategic business location for life sciences 14 Gearing up for growth: Molecular Partners powers Swiss biotechs’ rise 15 Year in review 19 Swiss biotech at a glance 28 Facts & figures 29 3 Editorial Switzerland’s success has been built on a combination of inter- nationalism and ‘Swissness’.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Banks, Scope, and Unavoidable Conflicts of Interest
    Investment Banks, Scope, and Unavoidable Conflicts of Interest ERIK SIRRI The author is a professor of finance and holder of the Walter H. Carpenter Chair at Babson College in Wellesley, Massachusetts. He thanks Jennifer Bethel and Laurie Krigman for helpful discussions. This paper was presented at the Atlanta Fed’s 2004 Financial Markets Conference, “Wall Street Against the Wall: Transparency and Conflicts of Interest.” There are certain sweet-smelling sugar-coated lies current in the world which all politic men have apparently tacitly conspired together to support and perpetuate. One of these is, that there is such a thing in the world as independence: independence of thought, indepen- dence of opinion, independence of action. Another is that the world loves to see independence—admires it, applauds it. —Mark Twain1 he investment banking community has tomers access to the research products of at least recently been the object of scorn, both three independent research firms for five years. on the regulatory front and in the press. These conflicts of interest are nothing new, and Critics have alleged a distinct lack of their existence was widely known throughout the independence in banks’ behavior and financial community. The conflicts are a consequence policies with regard to the objective- of the function of investment banks, which interme- nessT and independence of the research reports and diate the interaction between issuers and investors analyst recommendations. Retail investors, institu- in capital markets. Why the issue came to the fore tional investors, federal and state regulators, and in the last few years is debatable, but certainly con- Congress have expressed outrage over the conflicts tributing factors include the sharp market decline of interest that can exist in these large banks.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Finance Lecture Note Packet 2 Capital Structure, Dividend Policy and Valuation
    Aswath Damodaran 1 CORPORATE FINANCE LECTURE NOTE PACKET 2 CAPITAL STRUCTURE, DIVIDEND POLICY AND VALUATION Aswath Damodaran Spring 2016 Aswath Damodaran 2 CAPITAL STRUCTURE: THE CHOICES AND THE TRADE OFF “Neither a borrower nor a lender be” Someone who obviously hated this part of corporate finance First principles 3 Aswath Damodaran 3 The Choices in Financing 4 ¨ There are only two ways in which a business can raise money. ¤ The first is debt. The essence of debt is that you promise to make fixed payments in the future (interest payments and repaying principal). If you fail to make those payments, you lose control of your business. ¤ The other is equity. With equity, you do get whatever cash flows are left over after you have made debt payments. Aswath Damodaran 4 Global Patterns in Financing… 5 Aswath Damodaran 5 And a much greater dependence on bank loans outside the US… 6 Aswath Damodaran 6 Assessing the existing financing choices: Disney, Vale, Tata Motors, Baidu & Bookscape 7 Aswath Damodaran 7 8 The Transitional Phases.. 9 ¨ The transitions that we see at firms – from fully owned private businesses to venture capital, from private to public and subsequent seasoned offerings are all motivated primarily by the need for capital. ¨ In each transition, though, there are costs incurred by the existing owners: ¤ When venture capitalists enter the firm, they will demand their fair share and more of the ownership of the firm to provide equity. ¤ When a firm decides to go public, it has to trade off the greater access to capital markets against the increased disclosure requirements (that emanate from being publicly lists), loss of control and the transactions costs of going public.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Regulates Whom? an Overview of the US Financial Regulatory
    Who Regulates Whom? An Overview of the U.S. Financial Regulatory Framework Updated March 10, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R44918 Who Regulates Whom? An Overview of the U.S. Financial Regulatory Framework Summary The financial regulatory system has been described as fragmented, with multiple overlapping regulators and a dual state-federal regulatory system. The system evolved piecemeal, punctuated by major changes in response to various historical financial crises. The most recent financial crisis also resulted in changes to the regulatory system through the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act in 2010 (Dodd-Frank Act; P.L. 111-203) and the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA; P.L. 110-289). To address the fragmented nature of the system, the Dodd-Frank Act created the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC), a council of regulators and experts chaired by the Treasury Secretary. At the federal level, regulators can be clustered in the following areas: Depository regulators—Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and Federal Reserve for banks; and National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) for credit unions; Securities markets regulators—Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC); Government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) regulators—Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), created by HERA, and Farm Credit Administration (FCA); and Consumer protection regulator—Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), created by the Dodd-Frank Act. Other entities that play a role in financial regulation are interagency bodies, state regulators, and international regulatory fora. Notably, federal regulators generally play a secondary role in insurance markets.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Corporate Finance? Includes Any Decisions Made by a Business
    1 Lecture I What is Corporate Finance? Includes any decisions made by a business that affect its finances Three major decisions: • Investments: Where should a firm invest its (scarce) resources? - project analysis - security analysis • Financing: How should the firm raise (additional) resources? - equity/debt/hybrids - long/short term • Dividend decision: What should the firm do with excess resources? - reinvest in business - distribute as dividends/return on capital BAFI 402: Financial Management I, Fall 2001 A. Gupta 2 Lecture I Corporate Finance – a balance sheet perspective Balance Sheet Current Assets Current Liabilities Cash Accounts Payable Accounts Receivable Notes Payable Inventory Long-term Debt Fixed Assets Shareholder’s Equity Tangible Common Stock Intangible Retained Earnings Total Assets Total Liabilities & Equity _________________ ____________________ Investment decisions Financing decisions Two separate decisions BAFI 402: Financial Management I, Fall 2001 A. Gupta 3 Lecture I The objective of the firm Why do we need an objective function? - How do you pick amongst alternatives? (e.g. NPV rule for projects) - Single/multiple objectives – if multiple, how do you weight objectives, or prioritize? (e.g. man serving many masters!) What’s a good objective function? - clear and unambiguous (should not vary from case to case and person to person) - measurable, in a clear and timely manner (“social welfare” – how do you measure it?) - no side costs - should benefit firm’s long-term health and value What are some common candidates for the objective function of a corporate firm (and hence the financial manager?)? BAFI 402: Financial Management I, Fall 2001 A. Gupta 4 Lecture I The Corporate Objective • In traditional corporate finance , the objective of the firm is to maximize the value of the firm.
    [Show full text]
  • The Performance of Investment Bank-Affiliated
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS Vol. 47, No. 3, June 2012, pp. 537–565 COPYRIGHT 2012, MICHAEL G. FOSTER SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE, WA 98195 doi:10.1017/S0022109012000178 The Performance of Investment Bank-Affiliated Mutual Funds: Conflicts of Interest or Informational Advantage? (Grace) Qing Hao and Xuemin (Sterling) Yan∗ Abstract Using a comprehensive sample of U.S. mutual funds from 1992 to 2004, we find strong evidence that investment bank-affiliated funds underperform unaffiliated funds. Consistent with the conflict of interest hypothesis, we find that affiliated funds hold disproportionately large amounts of stocks of their initial public offering and seasoned equity offering clients. Moreover, worse-performing clients are more likely to be held by affiliated funds. Our re- sults are robust to alternative risk adjustments, portfolio weighting schemes, and regression methodologies. Overall, our findings are consistent with the idea that investment banks use affiliated funds to support underwriting business at the expense of fund shareholders. I. Introduction Bank funds buy clients’ shares as a show of support to help win more underwriting, lending, and merger work.... [Asaninvestment bank], you want to show that you are not only able to sell the deal, but you are able to put away the product. The more you can do that, the more your clients are going to be attracted to you. (Edward Siedle, former SEC attorney, cited in “Wall Street’s Dumping Ground,” Bloomberg (June 2004), by David Dietz and Adam Levy)
    [Show full text]