DOCSLIB.ORG

Global Financial Services Regulatory Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Global Financial Services Regulatory Guide Baker McKenzie’s Global Financial Services Regulatory Guide Baker McKenzie’s Global Financial Services Regulatory Guide Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 Argentina .............................................................................................. 3 Australia ............................................................................................. 10 Austria ................................................................................................ 22 Azerbaijan .......................................................................................... 34 Belgium .............................................................................................. 40 Brazil .................................................................................................. 52 Canada ................................................................................................ 64 Chile ................................................................................................... 74 People’s Republic of China ................................................................ 78 Colombia ............................................................................................ 85 Czech Republic ................................................................................... 96 France ............................................................................................... 108 Germany ........................................................................................... 118 Hong Kong ....................................................................................... 141 Hungary ............................................................................................ 163 Indonesia .......................................................................................... 177 Italy ................................................................................................... 184 Japan ................................................................................................. 192 Luxembourg ..................................................................................... 206 Malaysia ........................................................................................... 218 Mexico .............................................................................................. 225 Netherlands ....................................................................................... 235 Peru ................................................................................................... 244 Philippines ........................................................................................ 255 Baker McKenzie | i Poland ............................................................................................... 265 Russia ............................................................................................... 276 Saudi Arabia ..................................................................................... 290 Singapore .......................................................................................... 304 South Africa ..................................................................................... 313 Spain ................................................................................................. 325 Sweden ............................................................................................. 349 Switzerland ....................................................................................... 358 Taiwan .............................................................................................. 368 Thailand ............................................................................................ 382 Turkey .............................................................................................. 391 Ukraine ............................................................................................. 401 United Arab Emirates ....................................................................... 409 United Kingdom ............................................................................... 415 United States of America .................................................................. 428 Venezuela ......................................................................................... 450 Vietnam ............................................................................................ 464 ii | Baker McKenzie Baker McKenzie’s Global Financial Services Regulatory Guide Introduction The financial services industry is undergoing sweeping changes driven by regulatory developments and continued consolidation in the sector. The lines between traditionally discrete business areas have become less clear. Our new Global Financial Services Regulatory Guide provides a comprehensive summary of regulations applicable to banks and other financial services companies around the world. It covers 41 jurisdictions and brings together the collective knowledge and experience of more than 700 banking and finance lawyers in Baker McKenzie’s global network. Contact details for each country can be found at the end of the relevant chapter. Arun Srivastava Global Financial Services Regulatory Chair Baker McKenzie Baker McKenzie | 1 Baker McKenzie’s Global Financial Services Regulatory Guide Argentina Argentina 1. Who regulates banking and financial services in Argentina? The Argentine Central Bank (Banco Central de la República Argentina or ACB) is the governmental agency in charge of the regulation of financial entities in Argentina, and therefore of authorizing their registration, as stated in Article 7 of the Financial Entities Law No. 21,526 (FEL). The ACB exercises control and system monitoring through the Superintendence of Financial and Exchange Entities (SEFyC). The ACB’s main duties include: (i) the regulation of the financial system; (ii) the enactment of financial regulations; (iii) the flow of funds and regulation of interest rates; and (iv) the authorization regarding the registration of foreign banks. In accordance with the principle of equal treatment between both national and foreign capital, Argentine law sets no restrictions on the nationality of the investors who wish to participate in the local financial system nor on the operations that the entities in which they participate can perform. In addition, the Argentine capital market is regulated by the Argentine Securities Commission (Comisión Nacional de Valores or ASC), which is the entity in charge of regulation of public offerings, brokers and stock exchanges. In addition, the Capital Market Law No. 26,831 regulates public and private offerings in Argentina. Baker McKenzie | 3 2. What are the main sources of regulatory laws in Argentina? The legal framework regarding financial entities’ regulations in Argentina is mainly given by the following laws: • FEL No. 21,526 – The objective of this law is to regulate the establishment and operation of entities providing financial services, whether private or public, state or mixed in nature. The FEL regulates financial institutions’ organization, authorization and operational requirements, obligations, and permitted and prohibited activities. It also establishes penalties in connection with violations of the FEL, which include warnings, fines, disqualifications and revocation of the license to operate as a financial entity. • ACB’s Charter Law No. 24,144 – This law provides for the general organization of the ACB, its functions, rights and duties. The law aims to promote monetary and financial stability, employment and economic development with social equity to the extent possible within the policy framework established by the national government. • ACB’s implementing regulations – The ACB issues several resolutions to further regulate and implement the financial system in Argentina. They relate to all aspects of banking and financial activities, aimed to facilitate the understanding and monitoring of regulations. • Capital Market Law No. 26,831 – This regulates public and private offerings in Argentina and establishes the ASC as the regulatory authority for the public market. • ASC’s implementing regulations – The ASC is the official body responsible for the promotion, supervision and control of stock markets. The main purpose of the ASC is safeguarding investors’ and shareholders’ interests. 4 | Baker McKenzie Baker McKenzie’s Global Financial Services Regulatory Guide Argentina 3. What types of activities require a license in Argentina? Any banking or financial intermediation and/or solicitation of funds activities performed in Argentina require registration and licensing with the ACB. However, registration and licensing do not apply if the banking activities are performed entirely from outside Argentina. In addition, it is important to note that the FEL distinguishes among different types of financial entities, which include among others, commercial banks, investment banks, mortgages banks and financial entities. On the other hand, and in connection with capital markets, any public offering of securities shall be subject to the supervision and prior authorization of the ASC. From a corporate standpoint, there is a distinction between isolated activities and others performed on a regular basis. Any corporation performing activities on a regular basis in Argentina will need to establish local presence
Recommended publications
  • With Equities Looking Expensive, Where Should Investors Turn?

    With Equities Looking Expensive, Where Should Investors Turn?

    Active is: Thinking without limits With equities looking expensive, allianzgi.com where should investors turn? May 2021 US stocks are highly valued, and our 10-step checklist suggests they’re close to bubble territory. Non-US equities offer better value, but we still don’t think investors should drastically pare back their US holdings at this time. For more than a decade, stocks have been on a steady march upwards – and not even the global Key takeaways downturn caused by the Covid-19 pandemic has thrown them off for long. So are equities, – Equities, especially in the US, are very Stefan Hofrichter, expensive – around the level last seen CFA particularly in the US, too expensive? Could they Head of Global even be in bubble territory? If so, when might before the tech bubble burst in the Economics & they pop? late 1990s Strategy To answer these questions, we developed a – High valuations are one of the 10 10-criteria “bubble checklist” inspired by the characteristics of an asset bubble that work of Charles Kindleberger, an economic and we’ve identified – and the majority are financial-market historian. Each asset bubble showing red flags throughout history has been unique in its own – But until the Fed starts to “taper” its way – yet with few exceptions, each one also met essentially all 10 of these criteria. bond purchases, likely in 2022, US equities may very well bubble up further Our analysis indicates that today, US equities demonstrate most of the characteristics of an – We still prefer risk assets at this time asset bubble.
  • Cash Management and Fiduciary Banking Services

    Cash Management and Fiduciary Banking Services

    The Winterbotham Merchant Bank a division of The Winterbotham Trust Company Limited CASH MANAGEMENT AND FIDUCIARY BANKING SERVICES Table of Contents Winterbotham Group 4 Regulated Subsidiaries 5 Cash Management and Fiduciary Banking Services 6 Critical Advantages 7 What is Fiduciary Banking? 8 Additional Cash Management Services 9 The Winterbotham Merchant Bank 9 Winterbotham International Securities 10 WINTERBOTHAM GROUP Since our founding in 1990 The Winterbotham Group has focused on the provision of high quality financial services to a global clientele, utilizing the most modern technology, delivered personally. At Winterbotham we seek to add value and our suite of services and the location of their delivery has expanded as the needs of our clients have grown. Today Winterbotham operates in six international financial centers from which we offer services which are individually customized and delivered with an attention to detail now often lost as the transfer of service ‘online’ encourages financial decisions to be self-directed. During our almost three decades of growth Winterbotham’s ownership remains vested in the hands of its founder and his family and this continuity is mirrored in our vision which has not changed: YOUR OBJECTIVES = OUR OBJECTIVES ENABLING YOUR BUSINESS TO THRIVE The Winterbotham Trust Company Limited is a Bank and Trust Company, Broker/Dealer and Investment Fund Administrator, with Head Offices in Nassau, The Bahamas. Winterbotham operates a subsidiary Bank, WTC International Bank Corporation, in San Juan, Puerto Rico and non-banking regional offices/subsidiaries in the Cayman Islands, Chennai, Montevideo and Hong Kong. The group has developed a niche offering in the provision of back office, structuring, administration, corporate governance, IT and accounting services for entrepreneurs and their companies, wealthy individuals and families, their family offices, and for financial institutions.
  • Global Banking Private Placement

    Global Banking Private Placement

    May 2019 – Issue 4 Credit Journal Global Banking Private Placement 1 2 3 Banks Regulation Non-Bank Financial Institutions PAGE 2 PAGE 8 PAGE 11 4 5 6 Meet the Analyst Global Focus News & Events Q&A with Kevin Duignan, Global Head of Financial Institutions Ratings PAGE 14 PAGE 16 PAGE 20 Welcome to Credit Journal – a curated compilation of Fitch Ratings’ in-depth research and commentary. This latest edition takes a deep dive into banks and non-bank financial institutions (NBFIs). With coverage of close to 3,000 banks, securities firms, finance and leasing companies, financial market infrastructure companies, business development companies (BDCs), and investment managers, we are a leading force in bank and NBFI ratings. We hope this issue, as well as future ones, serve as reliable resources and help you make more informed investment decisions. We welcome comments for future issues, including suggestions for topical or credit-specific research. For our latest insights, please visit fitchratings.com Welcome In this new edition of Fitch Ratings’ Credit Journal, I am pleased to share with you a snapshot of Fitch’s credit views in the Bank and Non-Bank Financial Institution (NBFI) sectors. With heightened challenges of growth, stability, and risk at the end of the credit cycle, creditworthiness considerations are a main focus for 2019, providing significant opportunity for us to convey value-added opinions and publish insightful bank and NBFI research. Covering close to 3,000 banks and NBFIs worldwide, we are proud to be a leading force in financial institutions ratings, widely accepted by issuers, investors, and other debt capital markets participants.
  • Financial Institution Bond with Extended Coverages Table of Contents

    Financial Institution Bond with Extended Coverages Table of Contents

    Financial Institution Bond with Extended Coverages Table of Contents I. CONSIDERATION CLAUSE ............................................................................................................................................ 3 II. INSURING AGREEMENTS .............................................................................................................................................. 3 A. FIDELITY ..................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Coverage A.1. Employee Dishonesty ............................................................................................................. 3 Coverage A.2. Trading Loss ............................................................................................................................ 3 Coverage A.3. ERISA ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Coverage A.4. Restoration Expenses ............................................................................................................. 4 B. ON PREMISES ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 C. IN TRANSIT ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 D. FORGERY OR ALTERATION
  • Basel III: Post-Crisis Reforms

    Basel III: Post-Crisis Reforms

    Basel III: Post-Crisis Reforms Implementation Timeline Focus: Capital Definitions, Capital Focus: Capital Requirements Buffers and Liquidity Requirements Basel lll 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 1 January 2022 Full implementation of: 1. Revised standardised approach for credit risk; 2. Revised IRB framework; 1 January 3. Revised CVA framework; 1 January 1 January 1 January 1 January 1 January 2018 4. Revised operational risk framework; 2027 5. Revised market risk framework (Fundamental Review of 2023 2024 2025 2026 Full implementation of Leverage Trading Book); and Output 6. Leverage Ratio (revised exposure definition). Output Output Output Output Ratio (Existing exposure floor: Transitional implementation floor: 55% floor: 60% floor: 65% floor: 70% definition) Output floor: 50% 72.5% Capital Ratios 0% - 2.5% 0% - 2.5% Countercyclical 0% - 2.5% 2.5% Buffer 2.5% Conservation 2.5% Buffer 8% 6% Minimum Capital 4.5% Requirement Core Equity Tier 1 (CET 1) Tier 1 (T1) Total Capital (Tier 1 + Tier 2) Standardised Approach for Credit Risk New Categories of Revisions to the Existing Standardised Approach Exposures • Exposures to Banks • Exposure to Covered Bonds Bank exposures will be risk-weighted based on either the External Credit Risk Assessment Approach (ECRA) or Standardised Credit Risk Rated covered bonds will be risk Assessment Approach (SCRA). Banks are to apply ECRA where regulators do allow the use of external ratings for regulatory purposes and weighted based on issue SCRA for regulators that don’t. specific rating while risk weights for unrated covered bonds will • Exposures to Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) be inferred from the issuer’s For exposures that do not fulfil the eligibility criteria, risk weights are to be determined by either SCRA or ECRA.
  • Natural Persons, Juridical Persons and Legal Personhood

    Natural Persons, Juridical Persons and Legal Personhood

    Esta revista forma parte del acervo de la Biblioteca Jurídica Virtual del Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas de la UNAM www.juridicas.unam.mx http://biblio.juridicas.unam.mx exican M Review aw L New Series V O L U M E VIII Number 1 NATURAL PERSONS, JURIDICAL PERSONS AND LEGAL PERSONHOOD Elvia Arcelia QUINTANA ADRIANO* ABSTRACT. The study of commercial law can be divided into four basic ca- tegories: (a) individuals (natural persons); (b) objects of commerce; (c) legal instruments and (d) administrative and legal procedures. Business relations bet- ween individuals and business entities requires significant legal documentation, including atypical or nonstandard business contracts. A central feature of all business transactions is the “legal entity”, used by organizations worldwide to conduct business. In order for many businesses to carry out routine activities, they must have many of the same legal rights and responsibilities as natural persons. In a word, these entities require “legal personhood”. Which leads us to the question of Legitimation. The most widely used legal instruments are nons- tandardized business contracts. In essense, this is the delineation of contracting parties as entities with well-defined rights and obligations. This authority de- pends, in turn, on the legitimacy of the “personhood” of the contracting parties, which is often a point of dispute in business relations. Regardless of whether one accepts the use of terms “legal entity” and “legal personhood”, they often give rise to immeasurable and diverse conflicts domestically, regional and at global level. This had led to efforts to improve the rules of the International Chamber of Commerce and improve legal models that provide guidance to di- verse nations.
  • Explaining Financial Market Facts: the Importance of Incomplete Markets and Transaction Costs (P

    Explaining Financial Market Facts: the Importance of Incomplete Markets and Transaction Costs (P

    On the Emergence of Parliamentary Government: The Role of Private Information (p. 2) Edward J. Green Explaining Financial Market Facts: The Importance of Incomplete Markets and Transaction Costs (p. 17) S. Rao Aiyagari 1992 Contents (p. 32) 1992 Staff Reports (p. 33) Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review voi.17.no. 1 ISSN 0271-5287 This publication primarily presents economic research aimed at improving policymaking by the Federal Reserve System and other governmental authorities. Any views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis or the Federal Reserve System. Editor: Arthur J. Rolnick Associate Editors: S. Rao Aiyagari, John H. Boyd, Warren E. Weber Economic Advisory Board: Nobuhiro Kiyotaki, Jim Schmitz, Neil Wallace Managing Editor: Kathleen S. Rolfe Article Editor/Writers: Patricia C. Haswell, Kathleen S. Rolfe, Martha L. Starr Designer: Phil Swenson Associate Designer: Beth Grorud Typesetters: Jody Fahland, Correan M. Hanover Editorial Assistant: Correan M. Hanover Circulation Assistant: Cheryl Vukelich The Quarterly Review is published by the Research Department Direct all comments and questions to of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Subscriptions are Quarterly Review available free of charge. Research Department Articles may be reprinted if the reprint fully credits the source— Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis the Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank as well as the Quarterly P.O. Box 291 Review. Please include with the reprinted article some version of Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291 the standard Federal Reserve disclaimer and send the Minneapo- (612-340-2341 / FAX 612-340-2366). lis Fed Research Department a copy of the reprint.
  • Assessing the Effectiveness and Impact of Central Bank and Supervisory Policies in Greening the Financial System

    Assessing the Effectiveness and Impact of Central Bank and Supervisory Policies in Greening the Financial System

    INSPIRE Theme 6 Assessing the effectiveness and impact of central bank and supervisory policies in greening the financial system Overview of the projects funded under the third call for research proposals September 2020 PROJECT Energy transition intersectoral dependencies under different monetary and supervisory policy scenarios Moutaz Altaghlibi a and Rens van Tilberga a Sustainable Finance Lab, Utrecht University, The Netherlands As we transition our economies to a low carbon path, climate related transition risks to the financial sector pose a challenge to policy makers in their policy design. The unprecedented climate challenge requires the use and the development of new tools in order to quantify these risks and investigate the role of different policies to steer the transition in the right direction. Central banks and financial regulators can play an essential role in facilitating a successful transition by directing the funds needed to achieve this transition in the right direction and in a timely manner. However, any intervention by central banks should be evaluated across sectors and across scenarios in order to guarantee the effectiveness, efficiency and coherence with fiscal policies. Our methodology is scenario analysis based on a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model. Our CGE model allows us to capture feedback loops across sectors, along with tracking the change in prices and quantities following an exogenous change in policies, technologies, or consumer preferences. Moreover, in order to capture both risks and opportunities associated to the transition process, our model distinguishes between green and grey sub-sectors. It also uses sector-specific capital stocks which allows us to differentiate the cost of capital across sectors/scenarios.
  • The Current Expected Credit Loss Accounting Standard and Financial Institution Regulatory Capital

    The Current Expected Credit Loss Accounting Standard and Financial Institution Regulatory Capital

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY The Current Expected Credit Loss Accounting Standard and Financial Institution Regulatory Capital September 15, 2020 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 3 I. Background ....................................................................................................................... 6 II. CECL’s Implications for Financial Institution Regulatory Capital .......................... 14 III. Key Areas of Debate ....................................................................................................... 21 IV. Recommendations ........................................................................................................... 25 Executive Summary 3 Executive Summary The current expected credit loss (CECL) methodology is a new accounting standard for estimating allowances for credit losses. CECL currently applies—or will apply—to all entities whose financial statements conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States (GAAP), including all banks, credit unions, savings associations, and their holding companies (collectively, “financial institutions”) that file regulatory reports that conform to GAAP. CECL requires financial institutions and other covered entities to recognize lifetime expected credit losses for a wide range of financial assets based not only on past events and current conditions, but also on reasonable and supportable forecasts. Over the
  • The Effects of the Euro on Financial Markets, Activity and Structure

    The Effects of the Euro on Financial Markets, Activity and Structure

    THE EFFECTS OF THE EURO ON FINANCIAL MARKETS, ACTIVITY AND STRUCTURE The introduction of a single currency in Europe has led to both qualitative and quantitative improvements in the functioning of euro-area financial markets. The effects of enhanced competition have often occurred in sectors where they were maybe not so widely expected. For instance, this paper finds that the euro has acted as a catalyst for greater competition between sovereign issuers and markets within the region. Such a form of competition has great benefits if it leads to a convergence of national legal and regulatory environments toward the ‘best practice’ and the highest standards. Although the euro was designed as a regional currency to serve an area of 300 million or so inhabitants, it has already become a global currency. This has implications for the management of an increasingly global economy as financial stability and in particular crisis management often require global responses. This paper finds that in one recent crisis – the 11 September terrorist attacks on the United States – the rapid reaction of central banks in Europe and America served the interest of global financial stability well. Introduction The adoption of a single currency by 12 sovereign nation states was an unprecedented feat. Its consequences reach well beyond the financial system, and even in the comparatively narrow field of financial markets, they are almost too numerous to list. Much has been said and written about the impact of the euro on financial markets, but there has been far less analysis of the implications it may entail for the management of an increasingly global economy The globalisation of the world economy is an issue that is as relevant in Europe as it is in Oceania and East Asia as well as in many other parts of the world.
  • Reducing Procyclicality Arising from the Bank Capital Framework

    Reducing Procyclicality Arising from the Bank Capital Framework

    Joint FSF-BCBS Working Group on Bank Capital Issues Reducing procyclicality arising from the bank capital framework March 2009 Financial Stability Forum Joint FSF-BCBS Working Group on Bank Capital Issues Reducing procyclicality arising from the bank capital framework This note sets out recommendations to address the potential procyclicality of the regulatory capital framework for internationally active banks. Some of these recommendations are focused on mitigating the cyclicality of the minimum capital requirement, while maintaining an appropriate degree of risk sensitivity. Other measures are intended to introduce countercyclical elements into the framework. The recommendations on procyclicality form a critical part of a comprehensive strategy to address the lessons of the crisis as they relate to the regulation, supervision and risk management of internationally active banks. This strategy covers the following four areas: Enhancing the risk coverage of the Basel II framework; Strengthening over time the level, quality, consistency and transparency of the regulatory capital base; Mitigating the procyclicality of regulatory capital requirements and promoting the build up of capital buffers above the minimum in good economic conditions that can be drawn upon in stress; and Supplementing the capital framework with a simple, non-risk based measure to contain the build up of leverage in the banking system. The objective of these measures is to ensure that the Basel II capital framework promotes prudent capital buffers over the credit cycle and to mitigate the risk that the regulatory capital framework amplifies shocks between the financial and real sectors. As regulatory capital requirements are just one driver of bank lending behaviour, the proposals set out should be considered in the wider context of other measures to address procyclicality and reduce systemic risk.
  • The CEO's Guide to Corporate Finance

    The CEO's Guide to Corporate Finance

    CORPORATE FINANCE PRACTICE The CEO’s guide to corporate finance Richard Dobbs, Bill Huyett, and Tim Koller Artwork by Daniel Bejar Four principles can help you make great financial decisions— even when the CFO’s not in the room. The problem Strategic decisions can be com- plicated by competing, often spurious notions of what creates value. Even executives with solid instincts can be seduced by the allure of financial engineering, high leverage, or the idea that well-established rules of eco- nomics no longer apply. Why it matters Such misconceptions can undermine strategic decision making and slow down economies. What you should do about it Test decisions such as whether to undertake acquisitions, make dives- titures, invest in projects, or increase executive compensation against four enduring principles of corporate finance. Doing so will often require managers to adopt new practices, such as justifying mergers on the basis of their impact on cash flows rather than on earnings per share, holding regular business exit reviews, focusing on enterprise-wide risks that may lurk within individual projects, and indexing executive compensation to the growth and market performance of peer companies. 3 The CEO’s guide to corporate finance It’s one thing for a CFO to understand the technical methods of valuation—and for members of the finance organization to apply them to help line managers monitor and improve company performance. But it’s still more powerful when CEOs, board members, and other non- financial executives internalize the principles of value creation. Doing so allows them to make independent, courageous, and even un- popular business decisions in the face of myths and misconceptions about what creates value.