DOCSLIB.ORG

Chesapeake CEO Aubrey Mcclendon Has Borrowed $1.1 Billion Against His Stake in Company Wells, Reuters Has Found

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chesapeake CEO Aubrey Mcclendon Has Borrowed $1.1 Billion Against His Stake in Company Wells, Reuters Has Found ER BIG STAKES DN AR N G ea REUTERS/S The enerGY BIllIonaIre’S SHROUDED LOANS Chesapeake CEO Aubrey McClendon has borrowed $1.1 billion against his stake in company wells, Reuters has found. BY ANNA DRIVER AND BRIAN GROW SPECIAL REPORT 1 BIG STAKES THE ENERGY BILLIONAIRE’S SHROUDED LOANS APRIL 18, 2012 whose interest will he look out for, his own trial counsel at the Securities and Exchange or Chesapeake’s?” said Joshua Fershee, an Commission (SEC). “That may create a ubrey K. McClendon is one of the associate professor of energy and corporate conflict of interest.” most successful energy entrepre- law at the University of North Dakota. As a result, the loans should have been Aneurs of recent decades. But he The revelation of McClendon’s bout of fully disclosed to Chesapeake shareholders, hasn’t always proved popular with share- borrowing comes as he is scrambling to help the academics, attorneys and analysts said. holders of the company he co-founded, Chesapeake avert a multi-billion-dollar cash NO CONFLICT Chesapeake Energy Corp., the second-larg- shortfall amid a plunge in natural gas prices. est natural gas producer in the United States. It also exposes a potentially serious gap in Both McClendon and Chesapeake say the McClendon, 52, helped cause Chesa- how U.S. regulators scrutinize corporate exec- loans are purely private transactions that peake shares to plummet amid the financial utives, a decade after those rules were tightened the company has no responsibility to dis- crisis when he sold hundreds of millions in the wake of major accounting scandals. close or even to vet. And they disputed the of dollars in stock to raise cash for himself. The loans portend a number of possible view that the deals could create a conflict Later, to settle a lawsuit by shareholders, he problems, the analysts said. McClendon’s of interest. agreed to buy back a $12 million map col- biggest lender is simultaneously a major “I do not believe this is material to Chesa- lection that he’d sold to Chesapeake. investor in two units of Chesapeake. That peake,” McClendon said in an email response His approach to running his company connection raises questions about whether to questions. “There are no covenants or ob- also is renowned: Among other employee Chesapeake’s own financing terms could be ligations in my loan documents or mortgages perks, on-site Botox treatments are avail- influenced by its CEO’s personal borrowing. that bind Chesapeake in any way.” able at its headquarters in Oklahoma City, Chesapeake general counsel Henry Oklahoma. The more information the Hood said in a statement that the clause Now, a series of previously undisclosed company releases to shareholders in the loan agreements questioned by ana- loans to McClendon could once again put the better – particularly when it’s lysts – called “Compliance by Operator” – Chesapeake’s CEO and shareholders at odds. such a large amount of money. is “typical boilerplate language” used in oil McClendon has borrowed as much and gas mortgages. It requires borrowers to as $1.1 billion in the last three years by Mike Breard exercise their rights with operators of wells, pledging his stake in the company’s oil and Oil and gas analyst such as Chesapeake, on behalf of the lender. natural gas wells as collateral, documents Neither the existence of McClendon’s reviewed by Reuters show. Another concern: A clause in the deals loans nor their terms create the possibil- The loans were made through three com- requires McClendon “to take all commer- ity of a conflict of interest, Hood said, in panies controlled by McClendon that list cially reasonable action” to ensure that other part because the company has a first lien on Chesapeake’s headquarters as their address. owners and operators of the wells – includ- McClendon’s share of company wells. That The money is being used to help finance what ing Chesapeake – “comply with…covenants would mean Chesapeake gets paid before could be a lucrative perk of his job – the op- and agreements” of the loans. Such clauses all other creditors in the event that Mc- portunity to buy into the very same well stakes are common in energy-finance deals. But it Clendon defaults on his debt. that he is using as collateral for the borrowings. is rare for the CEO of a major energy com- “Any loans are Mr. McClendon’s per- The size and nature of the loans raise pany to be personally subject to one involv- sonal business and not appropriate for concerns about whether McClendon’s per- ing the corporation that he runs. That means review or monitoring by the company or sonal financial deals could compromise his McClendon could have an incentive to in- public comment,” Hood said. fiduciary duty to Chesapeake investors, ac- fluence Chesapeake to act in the interest of The company has many checks to pro- cording to more than a dozen academics, his lenders, rather than of his shareholders. tect against conflicts, Hood said. Among analysts and attorneys who reviewed the “Basically what you have here is a pri- them: Some of the world’s largest energy loan agreements for Reuters. vate transaction that could potentially im- companies own a share of Chesapeake wells “If Mr. McClendon has $1 billion in pact a public company, depending on the and “monitor the actions of the Company” debt through his own companies — com- manner in which the clause is interpreted via well audits, government filings and par- panies operating in the same industry as and applied,” says Thomas O. Gorman, a ticipation in development plans, Hood said. Chesapeake — he has or could have a high partner at law firm Dorsey & Whitney in He added that Chesapeake now em- degree of risk for conflicts of interest. As in, Washington, D.C., and a former special ploys more than 13,000 people and drills SPECIAL REPORT 2 BIG STAKES THE ENERGY BILLIONAIRE’S SHROUDED LOANS $500 Beneath the surface million A look at some borrowing by Chesapeake’s CEO $375 million THE LOANS $225 Loan amounts made to million* Aubrey McClendon THE COLLATERAL 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 McClendon secured the loans with his 2.5 percent working interest in new Chesapeake wells drilled each year 1,733 1,003 1,149 1,282 Net new (Color indicates the loan net new wells in supported) wells 2012 3,676 2,206 3,031 2,979 *Collateral not known TOTAL Sources: Financing statements filed in CHESAPEAKE Louisiana and Texas (loans); Securities and WELLS Exchange Commission filings (wells) more than 2,000 wells per year, “all of that McClendon has borrowed against his stake in wells it drills. Chesapeake says the which minimizes the ability of any one per- share of company wells, Hood said, but “the well plan is a uniquely powerful incentive son” – McClendon included – “to influence board did not review or approve the trans- because it aligns McClendon’s personal in- actionsMar ongin any single fall well.” actions.” Nor did the company vet the loan terests with those of the company. ChesapeakLess thane Energy four years’s daily ago, share a pricpersonale terms for possible conflicts. “If there were The well plan does not allow McClendon transaction by McClendon did negatively any conflicts of interest,” Hood said, “they to select the wells in which to invest; Chesa- $70 influence the company. would have surfaced by now.” peake says the program is an all-or-nothing 60To buy more Chesapeake stock, Mc- Chesapeake board members contacted de- proposition so that McClendon can’t cher- Clendon borrowed money from his bro- clined to comment. Marc Rome, Chesapeake’s ry-pick only the most profitable wells. kers50 - what’s called “buying on margin.” vice president for corporate governance, did “He has to eat his own cooking here,” In October 2008, just after the finan- not respond to requests for comment. said company spokesman Michael Kehs. October 2008: cial40 crisis erupted with the bankruptcyMcClendon The sells loans reveal how McClendon is us- But because McClendon is using the of Lehman Brothers, he was forcedstock to toing raise an unusual cash. corporate incentive as collat- loans to finance his participation in the well sell30 more than 31 million Chesapeake eral. The perk, known as the Founder Well plan, he defrays his risks. Two of McClen- shares for $569 million to cover margin Participation Plan, grants Chesapeake’s bil- don’s lenders, both private equity firms, in calls20 from those brokers. The company’s lionaire co-founder a 2.5 percent stake in turn spread the loan risks to other investors stock fell nearly 40 percent the week of the profits – and makes him pay 2.5 percent by raising money from state pension funds McClendon’s10 share sales. McClendon of the costs – of every well drilled during and other investors to fund them. Those issued an apology but the company’s each year he decides to participate. insights emerge from a February 2011 0 credibility with many shareholders suf- Today, Chesapeake is the only large document detailing a meeting between 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 fered significantly. publicly traded energy company to grant McClendon’s largest personal lender and a Source: Reuters Chesapeake’s board of directors is aware its CEO the opportunity to take a direct prospective investor. SPECIAL REPORT 3 BIG STAKES THE ENERGY BILLIONAIRE’S SHROUDED LOANS ron used off-balance-sheet entities to hide debt from investors. New accounting and corporate governance laws and regulations banned such transactions or required their disclosure. In September 2006, the SEC revised its related-party transaction rules to require companies to disclose when executives pledged corporate stock as collateral for loans.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Insiders See Slide As Opportunity to Buy Officers, Directors Snatch up Shares Before and Amid Last Week’S Gyrations
    20110815-NEWS--1-NAT-CCI-CL_-- 8/12/2011 2:41 PM Page 1 VOL. 32, NO. 33 $2.00/AUGUST 15 - 21, 2011 Insiders see slide as opportunity to buy Officers, directors snatch up shares before and amid last week’s gyrations By MICHELLE PARK directors and officers of companies [email protected] including Cliffs Natural Resources Inc., Olympic Steel Inc. and Timken Co. At a time when many investors have have bought tens, and sometimes scurried to sell, a number of Northeast hundreds, of thousands of dollars of Ohio company insiders have hurried to their companies’ stock. buy. Among them were P. Kelly Tomp- In the days before, during and after kins, a Cliffs executive, who bought last Monday’s stock market plunge, See BUY Page 17 Cliffs Natural Resources (CLF) Olympic Steel Inc. (ZEUS) Timken Co. (TKR) Closing price, July 22: $99.86 Closing price, July 22: $28.80 Closing price, July 22: $48.76 Closing price, Aug. 9: $73.71 ■ Change: -26% Closing price, Aug. 9: $20.73 ■ Change: -28% Closing price, Aug. 9: $35.94 ■ Change: -26% Buyers: Buyers: Buyers: ■ Aug. 1, P. Kelly Tompkins, executive vice president: ■ Aug. 5, Richard T. Marabito, chief financial officer: ■ Aug. 8, Frank C. Sullivan, director: 3,000 shares 2,500 shares ($223,000) 2,000 shares ($49,580) ($99,660) ■ Aug. 2, Andres Gluski, director: 1,130 shares ■ Aug. 5, Michael D. Siegal, chairman of the ■ Aug. 8, John M. Ballbach, director: 1,000 shares ($99,911) board/CEO: 1,500 shares ($37,185) ($36,560) LAUREN RAFFERTY ILLUSTRATION Invacare’s ‘One’ aimed INSIDE Energy companies rush to Getting fit while at the office Ohio’s oil, promise billions at streamlined output More companies are incorporating wellness programs and fitness By CHUCK SODER centers into their facilities as a way Discovery in shale follows area’s natural gas boom [email protected] to keep employees healthy and happy and, in turn, cutting health By DAN SHINGLER Buckeye State over the next 20 A less-than-enthusiastic group of care costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Chesapeake CEO Aubrey Mcclendon Has Borrowed $1.1 Billion Against His Stake in Company Wells, Reuters Has Found
    ER BIG STAKES DN AR N G ea REUTERS/S The enerGY BIllIonaIre’S SHROUDED LOANS Chesapeake CEO Aubrey McClendon has borrowed $1.1 billion against his stake in company wells, Reuters has found. BY ANNA DRIVER AND BRIAN GROW SPECIAL REPORT 1 BIG STAKES THE ENERGY BILLIONAIRE’S SHROUDED LOANS APRIL 18, 2012 whose interest will he look out for, his own trial counsel at the Securities and Exchange or Chesapeake’s?” said Joshua Fershee, an Commission (SEC). “That may create a ubrey K. McClendon is one of the associate professor of energy and corporate conflict of interest.” most successful energy entrepre- law at the University of North Dakota. As a result, the loans should have been Aneurs of recent decades. But he The revelation of McClendon’s bout of fully disclosed to Chesapeake shareholders, hasn’t always proved popular with share- borrowing comes as he is scrambling to help the academics, attorneys and analysts said. holders of the company he co-founded, Chesapeake avert a multi-billion-dollar cash NO CONFLICT Chesapeake Energy Corp., the second-larg- shortfall amid a plunge in natural gas prices. est natural gas producer in the United States. It also exposes a potentially serious gap in Both McClendon and Chesapeake say the McClendon, 52, helped cause Chesa- how U.S. regulators scrutinize corporate exec- loans are purely private transactions that peake shares to plummet amid the financial utives, a decade after those rules were tightened the company has no responsibility to dis- crisis when he sold hundreds of millions in the wake of major accounting scandals.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovation Unnoticed: Moving the Needle on Energy Public Relations
    2 Perry Street Communications Perry Street Communications Insights Innovation Unnoticed: Moving the Needle on Energy Public Relations 3131 McKinney Avenue, Suite 535 Dallas, TX 75204 214-965-9955 To Our Clients and Friends: From time to time, Perry Street Communications offers commentary and perspective on financial and corporate communication matters. We have traditionally done so in response to current events (proxy battles, the financial crisis, and the Toyota recall, to name a few), but in this instance were inspired to take a broader look at the energy industry which, despite well-funded and spirited public outreach campaigns, cannot shake the vestiges of lingering, often negative, public perception. In this memorandum, Perry Street assesses the state of play for the energy industry in this regard, examines what’s worked and what has not, and provides a roadmap for the future. The findings are not intended to provide definitive answers, but rather to anticipate areas of improvement and provoke thought. We hope you benefit from the research and perspective. Jon Morgan President, Perry Street Communications [email protected] (214) 965-9955 Innovation Unnoticed: Moving the Needle on Energy Public Relations Introduction In the world of our fathers, oil industry executives operated in small but influential circles where personal relationships, often cultivated outside the glare of public view, were the foundation upon which many an empire was built. Those days are long gone, of course, replaced by the often frenetic digital community that has transformed business and political cultures across the globe. With its insistence on transparency, access and immediate accountability, CEOs and world leaders ignore these dynamics at their own peril.
    [Show full text]
  • Sipes-Houston Chapter Newsletter
    MARCH 2016 SIPES-HOUSTON CHAPTER NEWSLETTER Aubrey McClendon Oil Price Hits Bottom Why Booms and Busts Happen Prospect Wilcox Formation Origin Tim Rynott $12B War Chest SIPES-Houston Newsletter | Mar 2016 In This Issue Sipes Houston Chapter Letter From The Editor 1 5535 Memorial Drive Jeff Allen Suite F 654 Houston, Texas 77007 February Luncheon 2 Tim Rynott Tel: 713-651-1639 Oil Price Bottoms 3 Fax: 713-951-9659 IEA www.sipeshouston.org email: [email protected] Prospect 4 Chapter Officers 2016 Public Relations Chair Why Booms and Busts Happen 6-7 Jeff Lund Zach Beauchamp Chapter Chair (713) 275-1664 James Mertz [email protected] 8 (281) 205-8140 Aubrey McClendon [email protected] Membership Chair(s) Chip Betz Origin of Wilcox Formation 9 Chair Elect (713) 658-8096 x 17 Russell Hamman [email protected] Dr. Don Van Nieuwenhuise (713) 526-7417 [email protected] Newsletter Chair February Luncheon Review 11 Jeff Allen Past Chair (713) 302-5131 Barry Rava Jay Moffitt [email protected] (713) -750-9485 x 104 News From The Board 12 [email protected] Deal Buyers List Chair Barry Rava Bill Smith Secretary (713) 650-3060 Barry Rava [email protected] Houston Unemployment 12 (713) 621-7282 [email protected] Political Affairs Chair Ross Davis Exxon $12B War Chest 13 Treasurer (713) 658-3131 Aleksandra Gjorgievska David Wood rossda- (281) 549-2376x101 [email protected] [email protected] Season Pass 14 Sponsor Coordinator Website Chair Christine Milliner Danny Matranga (562) 881-6326 Saving Rivals Not The Plan 15
    [Show full text]
  • Chesapeake Energy Corporation Brian Blaylock
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Robins Case Network Robins School of Business 1-2014 Chesapeake Energy Corporation Brian Blaylock David Earle Danielle Smith Jeffrey S. Harrison University of Richmond, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/robins-case-network Part of the Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Finance and Financial Management Commons, and the Operations and Supply Chain Management Commons Recommended Citation Blaylock, Brian, David Earle, Danielle Smith, and Jeffrey S. Harrison. Chesapeake Energy Corporation. Case Study. University of Richmond: Robins School of Business, 2014. This Case Study is brought to you for free and open access by the Robins School of Business at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Robins Case Network by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Chesapeake Energy Corporation January 2014 Written by Brian Blaylock, David Earle, Danielle Smith, and Jeffrey S. Harrison at the Robins School of Business, University of Richmond. Copyright © Jeffrey S. Harrison. This case was written for the purpose of classroom discussion. It is not to be duplicated or cited in any form without the copyright holder’s express permission. For permission to reproduce or cite this case, contact Jeff Harrison at [email protected]. In your message, state your name, affiliation and the intended use of the case. Permission for classroom use will be granted free of charge. Other cases are available at: http://robins.richmond.edu/centers/case-network.html In 2012, Chesapeake Energy Corporation, the second largest producer of natural gas in the United States, found itself at a turning point.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Gas: Fueling America’S Future
    NATURAL GAS: FUELING AMERICA’S FUTURE 2009 ANNUAL REPORT CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION CORPORATE PROFILE Chesapeake Energy Corporation is the second-largest producer of natural gas and the most active driller of new wells in the U.S. Headquartered in Oklahoma City, the company’s operations are focused on discovering and developing unconventional natural gas and oil fields onshore in the U.S. Chesapeake owns leading positions in the Barnett, Fayetteville, Haynesville, Marcellus and Bossier natural gas shale plays and in the Eagle Ford, Granite Wash and various other unconventional oil plays. The company has also vertically integrated its operations and owns substantial midstream, compression, drilling and oilfield service assets. Chesapeake’s stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol CHK. Further information is available at www.chk.com. ON THE COVER CONTENTS Scenes from the field to the natural gas 1 FINANCIAL REVIEW fueling station depict how Chesapeake 4 LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS explores for, produces and advocates the 14 FUELING AMERICA’S FUTURE expanded use of natural gas — the clean, 16 OPERATING AREAS affordable, abundant energy resource that 20 INVESTOR Q&A is Fueling America’s 22 SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Future. 24 COMMUNITY RELATIONS 26 ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH & SAFETY 28 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 28 GOVERNANCE 29 OFFICERS 30 EMPLOYEES 45 FORM 10-K INSIDE BACK COVER CORPORATE INFORMATION FINANCIAL REVIEW Six Months ($ in millions, except per share data) Ended Years Ended December 31 December 31 Years Ended June 30 Financial
    [Show full text]
  • Course Syllabus (Fall Semester) E-Mail: [email protected]
    Course Syllabus (Fall Semester) FNCE 4301: Advanced Issues in Security Valuation --- 3 Credits Instructor: Christopher Wilkos Office: Finance Dept. Office Hours: Tuesday 4 to 5pm & by appointment Pre-requisites: FNCE 3101 and FNCE 3302 Phone Numbers: Work: (860) 403-6364 Cell: (860) 305-7783 E-Mail: [email protected] Course Description: In this course, we study and interpret general business models, and identify the value drivers that create shareholder wealth. We learn to value an investment through assessing a company’s ability to produce free cash flow, maintain a consistent return on capital, and reinvest capital effectively over time. We also interpret financial and management practices that can lead to value destruction. Lastly, we evaluate the psychological framework and investment thought process that is useful in the analysis of the physical, intellectual, and emotional factors related to valuing an investment. Texts: Graham, B. and Dodd, D. (1940) Security Analysis: The Classic 1940 Edition, McGraw-Hill Klarman, Seth A. (1991) Margin of Safety: Risk-Averse Value Investing Strategies for the Thoughtful Investor, Harper Business Mauboussin & Callahan Business Sustainability & Measuring the Moat Thorndike, William N. The Outsiders: Eight Unconventional CEOs Required Cases: Investment Policy at the Hewlett Foundation (2005) 205126-PDF-ENG Design Thinking and Innovation at Apple 609066-PDF-ENG Warren Buffett, 2005 UV0016-PDF-ENG Mars Incorporated; Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company UV4277-PDF-ENG Going to the Oracle: Goldman Sachs,
    [Show full text]
  • Turner's Social Drama and Team Relocation
    THE "OKLAHOMA CITY PLUNDER" Turner's Social Drama and Team Relocation MATTHEW MORRIS THIS ESSAY FRAMES THE PHENOMENON OF TEAM RELOCATION AS A SOCIAL DRAMA DEFINED BY ANTHROPOLOGIST VICTOR TURNER. TO SUP PORT THIS VIEW I EX A MINED THE CONTROVERSY SURROUNDING THE SEATTLE SUPERSONICS' MOVE TO OKLAHOMA CITY, WHICH OCCURRED OVER A TWO-YEAR PERIOD BEGINNING IN 2006 AND ENDING IN 2008. I PROVIDE A CONTEXT FOR TEAM RELOCATION IN THE FOUR MAJOR PROFES- SIONAL SPORTS LEAGUES OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA AS WELL AS THE SPE- CIFIC CONTEXT OF THE SUPERSONICS CONTROVERSY. I THEN ANALYZE THE SITUA- TION AS A SOCIAL DRAMA OCCURRING BETWEEN TWO PARTIES! CITY OFFICIALS AND TEAM OWNERS. THE MEDIA'S ROLE AS AN INTERMEDIARY AND THE FAN'S ROLE AS AN OBSERVER ARE ALSO EXPLORED. I CONCLUDE BRIEFLY NOTING THE IMPACT OF TEAM RELOCATION ON THE FANS. INTRODUCTION empower themselves and strengthen their position. Throughout the history of the four major professional According to Bishop, this process "that begins with a team sports leagues of the United States and Canada, team relo- expressing its desire for a new stadium and concludes with cation has been common practice for team owners. Of the the construction of that stadium has all the makings of v 122 teams that make up Major League Baseball (MLB), the what anthropologist Victor Turner calls a 'social drama."' National Football League (NFL), the National Basketball Turner defines social dramas as "an eruption from the level Association (NBA), and the National Hockey League surface of ongoing social life, with its interactions, transac- (NHL), 40 have relocated 52 times.
    [Show full text]
  • AUBREY Mcclendon ( -
    COURT OF COMMON PLEAS BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO AMERICAN ENERGY CORPORATION, CASE NO. 46226 National Road St. Clairsville, OH 43950 JUDGE JO : !N M~0' OVAN, II Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR TEMPORARY, v. PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS, LP, 301 N.W. 63rd, Suite 600 Oklahoma City, OK 73116 JURY DEMAND ENDORSED HEREON and - ) AUBREY McCLENDON ( -_.... 301 N.W. 63rd, Suite 600 '' ) ( Oklahoma City, OK 73116 Defendants. \ ' \ ' COMPLAINT Plaintiff American Energy Corporation hereby files this Complaint against Defendant American Energy Partners, LP ("American Energy Partners") and Defendant Aubrey McClendon (collectively "Defendants") for violation of the Ohio Deceptive Trade Practices Act; the Ohio common law of unfair competition; and the Ohio common law of trademark and trade name infringement, and states as follows: INTRODUCTION 1. This action is brought by Plaintiff, American Energy Corporation, an Ohio corporation, with offices and operations in Belmont County, Ohio, against Defendants, American Energy Partners and Aubrey McClendon, under the Ohio Deceptive !Fade Practices Act, O.R.C. § 4165.01, et. seq.; the Ohio common law of unfair competition; and the Ohio common law of trademark and trade name infringement, seeking temporary, preliminary and permanent injunctive relief in connection with the recent adoption and use of Defendants' corporate name, "American Energy Partners, LP" because use of the name will cause a likelihood of confusion as to source, sponsorship, approval or certification of Plaintiffs goodwill and services and cause a likelihood of confusion as to affiliation, connection or association with or certification of Plaintiff, American Energy Corporation. 2. American Energy Corporation is both a common law trade name and trademark (collectively "Mark") and is r~gistered with the Ohio Secretary of State and has been used as such since Plaintiff American Energy Corporation was incorporated in Ohio on April 12, 1993.
    [Show full text]
  • National Basketball Association (Appendix 2)
    NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION {Appendix 2, to Sports Facility Reports, Volume 17} Research completed as of August 11, 2016 Team: Atlanta Hawks Principal Owner: Tony Ressler Year Established: 1949 as the Tri-City Blackhawks, moved to Milwaukee and shortened the name to become the Milwaukee Hawks in 1951, moved to St. Louis to become the St. Louis Hawks in 1955, moved to Atlanta to become the Atlanta Hawks in 1968. Team Website Twitter: @ATLHawks Most Recent Purchase Price ($/Mil): $730 (2015) included the team, assumption of some debt, and the operating rights to Philips Arena. Current Value ($/Mil): $825 Percent Change From Last Year: 0% Arena: Philips Arena Date Built: 1999 Facility Cost ($/Mil): $213.5 Percentage of Arena Publicly Financed: 91% Facility Financing: The facility was financed through $130.75 million in government-backed bonds to be paid back at $12.5 million a year for thirty years. A 3% car rental tax was created to pay for $62.5 million of the public infrastructure costs, and Time Warner contributed $20 million for the remaining infrastructure costs. Facility Website Twitter: @PhilipsArena UPDATE: The Hawks are in discussion to redevelop the area surrounding Philips Arena into a mixed-use entertainment district. The redevelopment plan would involve investments of hundreds of millions of dollars, and this plan is fluid and coincides with negotiations with the City for major renovations to the Philips Arena. © Copyright 2016, National Sports Law Institute of Marquette University Law School Page 1 NAMING RIGHTS: Royal Philips Electronics N.V. of the Netherlands is paying $185 million over twenty years, or $9.25 million annually, for the naming rights that expire in 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Fracking, Fairness and the Future, Full Report
    FRACKING, FAIRNESS AND THE FUTURE Making Sure Ohio Taxpayers And Workers Share In The Benefits INTRODUCTION Ohio’s oil and gas resources have caught the attention of drillers, investors and political leaders alike. Thanks to a process known as hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”), and a move to horizontal drilling (as opposed to traditional vertical wells) oil and gas trapped deep under the surface can be extracted in sufficient volumes to make drilling in layers of shale deep below the ground economically feasible. Geologists estimate that the amount of natural gas trapped in the shale rock beneath Ohio could be enough to fuel the state for 21 years.viii Industry estimates place the size of the natural gas reserve at 20 trillion cubic feet. Similarly, the potential to recover oil from Ohio’s shale has drawn industry insiders to remark that the Utica shale may represent one of the biggest domestic oil finds in 40 years, with state estimates ranging as high as 5.5 billion barrels of oil.ix Ohio’s shale resources are trapped in two main geologic formations, the Marcellus and the Utica. Both span an area beneath several northeastern states, Lake Erie and southeastern Canada. The Marcellus was the first to capture the attention of oil and gas exploration companies, with most of the early focus on natural gas recovery from the Marcellus shale under Pennsylvania. More recently, companies have set their sights on Ohio’s Utica shale, located deeper below the earth than the Marcellus, but curving upward so steeply that under portions of Ohio, the shale is within 2000 feet of the surface, making the oil and gas trapped within the rock easier and cheaper to obtain.
    [Show full text]
  • Drumbeat: June 25, 2012
    The Oil Drum | Drumbeat: June 25, 2012 http://www.theoildrum.com/node/9285 Drumbeat: June 25, 2012 Posted by Leanan on June 25, 2012 - 9:07am Oil economists predict growth until 2030 “We think that oil demand will peak by 2030 and decline thereafter,” said chief analyst at Statoil, Eirik Wærness. Statoil presented its annual forecast for global economics and energy markets - Energy Perspectives 2012, Thursday. According to Mr Wærness, who penned the report with analyst Kyrre M Knudsen and chief economist Klaus Mohn, Statoil expects a yearly growth of around 1 million barrels a day towards the 2020s. Demand will fall slightly during that decade, before leveling off around 2030. The three believe lower economic growth, higher efficiency and increased use of electricity and gas will be the drivers causing demand for oil to decline after 2030. Is Peak Oil Dead? From the deepest waters of the Gulf of Mexico to the prairies of North Dakota, and many places in between, the production of oil and gas in the United States has greatly increased over recent years through the industry’s ability to access heretofore inaccessible and unaffordable "unconventional oil." Using new technology and financed by the rising prices of oil since the mid-2000s, national oil production has risen over the past four years from 4.95 million barrels a day (mb/d) to 5.7. The Energy Department projects 7 mb/d by 2020, while other experts claim production could eventually be 10 million, which would put the United States in the league with Saudi Arabia. With this increased production, a growing number of people (especially from the oil industry, Wall Street, and the Republican Party) have loudly proclaimed the end of peak oil, dismissing it as a myth that has now been dispelled.
    [Show full text]