Multi-Level Governance in Europe - the Implication of German Laender in the Development of the Lisbon Treaty and the Strengthening of the Regional Level in Europe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Multi-Level Governance in Europe - the Implication of German Laender in the Development of the Lisbon Treaty and the Strengthening of the Regional Level in Europe UNIVERSITA’ DEGLI STUDI DI PADOVA DIPARTIMENTO DI SCIENZE STORICHE, GEOGRAFICHE E DELL’ANTICHITÀ CORSO DI LAUREA MAGISTRALE IN LOCAL DEVELOPMENT - SVILUPPO LOCALE Master Thesis: MULTILEVEL GOVERNANCE AND TERRITORIAL COOPERATION. OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOCAL AUTHORITIES IN EUROREGION BALTIC Supervisor: Prof. EKATERINA DOMORENOK Candidate: VALENTINA SCANDOLA Registr. number:1131972 Academic Year 2016/2017 ii Ai miei genitori iii iv Sommario INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 -CHAPTER 1- ........................................................................................................................................................................... 4 THE PROCESS OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND THE CONCEPT OF MULTILEVEL- GOVERNANCE .......................................... 4 1.1- THE EVOLUTION OF THE EU COHESION POLICY: PRINCIPLES AND INSTRUMENTS ....................................................................... 4 1.2. MULTILEVEL GOVERNANCE AND THE PROCESS OF EUROPEANIZATION ............................................................................. 9 1.3. OPERATIONAL PRINCIPLES OF MLG .................................................................................................................................. 15 1.3.1- Programming ............................................................................................................................................................ 15 1.3.2- Partnership and MLG ................................................................................................................................................ 17 1.3.3 Networks .................................................................................................................................................................... 19 1.3.4- Operationalizing MLG: programmes of territorial cooperation (INTERREG) ............................................................ 21 1.4- RESEARCH DESIGN ............................................................................................................................................................ 24 -CHAPTER 2- ......................................................................................................................................................................... 28 THE PROCESSES OF COOPERATION IN THE BALTIC SEA REGION ........................................................................................... 28 HISTORIC EVOLUTION- AN OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................. 28 2.1- HISTORY OF INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION AND INTEGRATION IN THE BALTIC SEA: TOWARDS TRANSNATIONAL NETWORKS .............................................................................................................................................................................. 28 2.2- CROSS-BORDER AND TRANSNATIONAL COOPERATION IN THE BALTIC SEA ..................................................................... 32 2.2.1- A historical framing- the launch of INTERREG in the Baltic Sea (2000-2006) ........................................................... 32 2.2.2- INTERREG Strand A- Cross-border cooperation ........................................................................................................ 33 2.2.3- INTERREG Strand B- Transnational cooperation ...................................................................................................... 34 2.3- BUILDING THE BALTIC SEA MACRO-REGIONAL STRATEGY ................................................................................................ 36 2.3.1- EU- strategy for macro-regional cooperation........................................................................................................... 36 2.3.2- EUSBSR- European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region ................................................................................... 40 2.3.3- Building MLG in the EUSBSR ..................................................................................................................................... 41 2.3.4- INTERREG programs and the development of a MLG architecture: Remarks .......................................................... 43 -CHAPTER 3- ......................................................................................................................................................................... 47 EUROREGION BALTIC: OVERLAPPING GOVERNANCE ARCHITECTURES ................................................................................. 47 3.1- INSTITUTIONAL AND GOVERNANCE SETTINGS ................................................................................................................. 47 3.2- PROGRAMMING: JOINT DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION STRATEGY ................................................................................. 54 3.2.1- ERB programming..................................................................................................................................................... 54 3.2.2-EU programming: INTERREG South Baltic Program and its specific profile .............................................................. 57 3.3- PARTNERSHIPS AND NETWORKS IN ERB AND IN THE INTERREG SOUTH BALTIC PROGRAM ............................................. 67 3.3.1- ERB and the cooperation with the Russian partner- Kaliningrad region .................................................................. 67 3.3.2- Partnership in INTERREG South Baltic (2007-2013/ 2014-2020) .............................................................................. 68 3.4- MLG ASSESSMENT IN THE SOUTH BALTIC CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION NETWORK ..................................................... 70 -CHAPTER 4- ......................................................................................................................................................................... 72 CASE STUDIES: PROJECTS AND EMPOWERMENT ................................................................................................................. 72 4.1- INTRODUCTION AND FRAMEWORK OF ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................ 72 4.2- CASE STUDY 1: MOMENT & MOMENT UP PROJECT .......................................................................................................... 72 4.2.1- Background ............................................................................................................................................................... 73 4.2.2-Objectives and outputs of MOMENT and MOMENT UP ............................................................................................ 75 4.2.3-Governance Assessment ............................................................................................................................................ 76 4.3- CASE STUDY 2: INTERCONNECT ...................................................................................................................................... 100 4.3.1- Background ............................................................................................................................................................. 101 4.3.2- Objectives of INTERCONNECT ................................................................................................................................. 102 4.3.3- Governance Assessment ......................................................................................................................................... 103 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................................................... 111 v vi INTRODUCTION Since the end of the 1980s, territorial cooperation and cohesion policies have been included in the list of political priorities of European integration thereby opening new opportunities for cooperation not only between states, but also between regional and local authorities. These processes clearly emerged at macro-regional scale and concerned territories characterized by common historical and cultural heritage, which nowadays try to find shared solutions to common challenges. The so-called “Baltic Sea Region”, which is the subject of this research, is a par excellence example of such a development. Eight different countries border the Baltic Sea (Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Germany and Denmark) with 85 million inhabitants (17% of the EU’s total population). These countries share the Baltic Sea resources and, as a consequence, they are all concerned with safeguarding water and biodiversity by developing joint efforts for sustainable development. Obviously, we can note at a glance that the extension of the whole area is huge and its size may be expected to be a challenge for formulation and implementation of vast scale policy measures. Instead, the Baltic Sea Region is known for its particularly active cross-border and transnational cooperation, the scope of which relies on a strong trend towards homogenization of the area and to its growing perception as a single entity. Several generations of the European territorial cooperation programmes (INTERREG) have been among the main triggers of these processes, with the objective of coordinating political and financial actions of all countries of the
Recommended publications
  • Choose Fyrfack!
    Do you want to know more? CHOOSE We will be arranging ongoing information meetings with examples of the fyrfack bins. You can find the locations and dates of these meetings on ssam.se FYRFACK! Sopor är inte and on our Facebook page. bara skräp! Do you have questions Matavfall är en resurs värt att or comments about ta hand om. Varje år slänger recycling? At ssam.se, there is both information and in-depth svenska folket cirka 1,3 material. You can also choose to e-mail us at: miljoner ton mat och det är [email protected] hushållen som slänger mest 0470-59 95 00 mat av alla. De står för ungefär hälften av den mat som årligen For information in slängs. a different language: Visit our website ssam.se. At the top right corner of our webpage, you can translate the information into your desired language In a short time, fyrfack (four-compartment bin) sorting, the new system for waste management will be introduced. The fyrfack system will enable us to offer better service and make your everyday life more flexible. We will be collecting your food waste and your newspapers, packaging material and electronic waste (e.g. light sources and batteries). You won’t need to drive to the recycling station. But first and foremost, this will enable us all to work together for a more sustainable environment. Sorting trash, however, is not only an important way of protecting people and the environment and conserving resources. As a matter of fact, every resident has a legally-mandated obligation to sort his or her household’s wastepaper for recycling, packaging materials, dangerous waste, medicines and bulky refuse.
    [Show full text]
  • EU-CELAC Innovact Platform: Innovation to Promote Territorial Cohesion 2
    31st August 2017 EU-CELAC Innovact Platform: Innovation to promote Territorial Cohesion Task 3 – Selection of EU regions www.technopolis-group.com Factsheets of EU border regions Austria-Czech Republic https://www.keep.eu/keep/nuts/searchByRegion Name of the programme: Interreg VA Austria-Czech Republic Countries involved: Austria-Czech Republic Regions involved: Niederösterreich, Wien, Oberösterreich (AT), Jihozápad, Jihovýchod (CZ) Programme website: http://www.at-cz.eu/ Contact details of the managing authority: Amt der Niederösterreichischen Landesregierung Landhausplatz [email protected] Programmeinformation Relevant priorities for cross-border economic Food & nutrition (ingredients and modification of food, materials, development and innovation in 2014-2020 smart packaging, food quality, quality assurance, food production technologies) Specific objectives of the programme - Improved and extended research and innovation capacities - Fostering the involvement of enterprises (primarily SMEs) in the innovation system - Valorising the region's cultural and natural heritage in a sustainable way Priorities - Increase of ecological stability and improvement of ecosystem services - Fostering the utilisation of eco-innovative potential of the region - Extension of common supply of education and qualification activities in order to utilize human resources potential in cross- border region - Fostering cross-border cooperation of communities and institutions in joint regions Name of the Euroregion in the region Euregio Silva Nortica http://www.silvanortica.com/de/clanky-0/aktuell.htm Contact details http://www.silvanortica.com/de/clanky-0/aktuell.htm NÖ.Regional.GmbH - Büro Waldviertel Sparkassenplatz 1/2/3 A - 3910 Zwettl Büro von NÖ.Regional.GmbH - WV in Zwettl finden Sie hier Tel.: +43 02822 / 21380 Euroregion Fax: +43 02822 / 21380 DW 40 E-Mail: [email protected] DI Josef Strummer Büroleiter Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • And Polyfluoroalkyl Substances at a Contaminated Fire Training Facility To
    Subscriber access provided by ECCC Library Services / Accès fournit par les Service de bibliothèque d'ECCC Article Plant uptake of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances at a contaminated fire training facility to evaluate the phytoremediation potential of various plant species Laura Gobelius, Jeffrey Lewis, and Lutz Ahrens Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b02926 • Publication Date (Web): 03 Oct 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on October 19, 2017 Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
    [Show full text]
  • Compass 2009/04
    COMPASS of the South Baltic Programme Newsletter 2009/04 www.southbaltic.eu CONTENT 1 The South Baltic Programme is looking for a partner consortium to apply for the Capacity Building Project 2 Interview with Mr S∏awomir Demkowicz-Dobrzaƒski, Head of the Euroregion delegation of the South Baltic Programme 3 The Third Call for Proposals is Dear Southbaltic Friends, photo Albrecht E. Arnold closed: 18 applications received. The Call for Proposals for Capacity Due to number of projects that did not manage to submit application by 30 September, the Building Project Monitoring Committee decided to open additional call for proposals already in November 2009. 4 In this issue you will meet Mr S∏awomir Demkowicz- Dobrzaƒski and the mission of Eurore- Approved projects of the first and gion Baltic. We continue the presentations of our approved projects as well as Contact second calls Points in your region, Polish Regional Contact Points are approached this time. Together 6 with Compass you will find statistics from the third Call for Proposals, the variety of meas- South Baltic Programme in your ures, financial data and set up of partnership in submitted projects. region: Regional Contact Points In regards to the South Baltic Programme motto – going local, meeting your needs, connect- in Poland ing people and ideas – we launched the Call for Capacity Building Project to help our poten- 8 tial beneficiaries in successful applying for upcoming Calls for Proposals. And finally, we Learn more about the continue learning about the South Baltic area. South Baltic area Enjoy the reading! The South Baltic Team South Baltic Cross-border Co-operation Programme opens the Additional Call for Proposals 3 November 2009 – 11 January 2010 Additional Call for Proposals (4th) South Baltic Cross-border Co-operation Programme The Application Form shall be submitted in an electronic version via e-mail until 11 January 2010, 4.00 p.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for Tourism and Outdoor Recreation in the Blekinge Archipelago, Sweden
    WP 2009:1 Zoning in a future coastal biosphere reserve - Planning for tourism and outdoor recreation in the Blekinge archipelago, Sweden Rosemarie Ankre WORKING PAPER www.etour.se Zoning in a future coastal biosphere reserve Planning for tourism and outdoor recreation in the Blekinge archipelago, Sweden Rosemarie Ankre TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE………………………………………………..…………….………………...…..…..5 1. BACKGROUND………………………………………………………………………………6 1.1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………….…6 1.2 Geographical and historical description of the Blekinge archipelago……………...……6 2. THE DATA COLLECTION IN THE BLEKINGE ARCHIPELAGO 2007……….……12 2.1 The collection of visitor data and the variety of methods ………………………….……12 2.2 The method of registration card data……………………………………………………..13 2.3 The applicability of registration cards in coastal areas……………………………….…17 2.4 The questionnaire survey ………………………………………………………….....……21 2.5 Non-response analysis …………………………………………………………………..…25 3. RESULTS OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY IN THE BLEKINGE ARCHIPELAGO 2007………………………………………………………………..…..…26 3.1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………...……26 3.2 Basic information of the respondents………………………………………………..……26 3.3 Accessibility and means of transport…………………………………………………...…27 3.4 Conflicts………………………………………………………………………………..……28 3.5 Activities……………………………………………………………………………....…… 30 3.6 Experiences of existing and future developments of the area………………...…………32 3.7 Geographical dispersion…………………………………………………………...………34 3.8 Access to a second home…………………………………………………………..……….35 3.9 Noise
    [Show full text]
  • Småland‑Blekinge 2019 Monitoring Progress and Special Focus on Migrant Integration
    OECD Territorial Reviews SMÅLAND-BLEKINGE OECD Territorial Reviews Reviews Territorial OECD 2019 MONITORING PROGRESS AND SPECIAL FOCUS ON MIGRANT INTEGRATION SMÅLAND-BLEKINGE 2019 MONITORING PROGRESS AND PROGRESS MONITORING SPECIAL FOCUS ON FOCUS SPECIAL MIGRANT INTEGRATION MIGRANT OECD Territorial Reviews: Småland‑Blekinge 2019 MONITORING PROGRESS AND SPECIAL FOCUS ON MIGRANT INTEGRATION This document, as well as any data and any map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Please cite this publication as: OECD (2019), OECD Territorial Reviews: Småland-Blekinge 2019: Monitoring Progress and Special Focus on Migrant Integration, OECD Territorial Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264311640-en ISBN 978-92-64-31163-3 (print) ISBN 978-92-64-31164-0 (pdf) Series: OECD Territorial Reviews ISSN 1990-0767 (print) ISSN 1990-0759 (online) The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeli authorities. The use of such data by the OECD is without prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of international law. Photo credits: Cover © Gabriella Agnér Corrigenda to OECD publications may be found on line at: www.oecd.org/about/publishing/corrigenda.htm. © OECD 2019 You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgement of OECD as source and copyright owner is given.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome out – Into the Nature of Kronoberg!
    Welcome out – into the nature of Kronoberg! – Your guide to 35 beautiful nature reserves Production: The County Council Administrative Board, Kronoberg County, 2019. Cover picture: Tobias Ivarsson. Photographers: Tobias Ivarsson: golden plover, pg. 9; black grouse lekking, pg. 11; witch’s hair lichen, pg. 32; wood grouse, pg. 36; fritillary, pg. 44; common tern, pg. 54; osprey, pg. 92; black-throated loon, pg. 96. Ljungby Municipality: pine plant, pg. 98. Småland pictures: Kronoskogen, pg. 97; outdoor gym, pg. 98; coffee break “fika”, pg. 99.The County Administrative Board: Eva Elfgren: cross-leaf heath, pg. 12; leafy verdure, pg. 81; Per Ekerholm: marsh gentian, pg. 18; Thomas Hultquist: crane, pg. 39; Magnus Strindell: ox-tongue fungus, pg. 47; Elin Åkelius: cowslip, pg. 51; The County Council Administrative Board: dalmatian spot, pg. 53; Peter Mattiasson: Mörrumsån, ppg. 56–57; Börge Pettersson: soprano pipistrelles, pg. 65; Mats Wilhelm Pettersson: hay meadow, pg. 69; Emil Persson: scarlet waxcap, pg. 75; Peter Wredin: hazel dormouse nest, pg. 80; Heléne Petterson: view over Toftasjön, pg. 87; Martin Unell: fireplace, pg. 92.Other photos: Ellen Flygare and Martin Wargren, The County Council Administrative Board. Text: Ellen Flygare, except Kronoskogen, where the author is Naturcentrum AB. Maps: Peter Mattiasson. Background map: © Lantmäteriet Geodatasamverkan. The guide is available at the County Council web site, www.lansstyrelsen.se/kronoberg Welcome out into nature! The book you are holding in your hand is a guide to the nature of Kronoberg. We have chosen 35 nature reserves with beautiful scenery, well worth a visit, and present them in words and pictures. The book also includes a cultural reserve, Linneaus’ Råshult.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogas Production Using Sludge from Small Scale Sewage Plants a Feasibility Study in Ronneby Municipality
    Bi oga s pr oduct ion using sludge from small scale sewage plants REPORT 4.2.3 MOMENT | REPORT BIOGAS FEASIBILITY Title Biogas production using sludge from small scale sewage plants a feasibility study in Ronneby municipality Author(s) Catarina Welin Date 2011 MOMENT Partner(s) Municipality of Ronneby Editors Tobias Facchini Stan Weyns 3 MOMENT | REPORT BIOGAS FEASIBILITY TABLE OF CONTENT ABOUT PROJECT MOMENT .................................................................................. 6 Contact us ......................................................................................................................... 6 ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................. 7 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 8 OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................... 9 METHOD ................................................................................................................. 9 The study area .................................................................................................................. 9 Sewer inventory .............................................................................................................. 10 FEASIBILITY STUDY ON BIOGAS ....................................................................... 13 Anaerobic digestion - a microbiological process ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Border Regions in the European Union
    CXe[\j`ejk`klk]i >\jle[_\`kle[8iY\`k [\jCXe[\jEfi[i_\`e$N\jk]Xc\e Landesinstitut für Evaluation of Border Regions Gesundheit und Arbeit des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen in the European Union (EUREGIO) Final Report Ulenbergstraße 127 - 131, 40225 Düsseldorf Fax 0211 3101-1189 LIGA.Fokus 1 [email protected] order Regions in the European Union (EUREGIO) in the European Regions order www.liga.nrw.de Wissenschaftliche Reihe • Band 25 •Evaluation of B of 25 •Evaluation • Band Reihe Wissenschaftliche www.liga.nrw.de Impressum.qxd 10.06.2008 10:45 Seite 2 This document has been prepared as part of the project "Evaluation of Border Regions in the European Union (EUREGIO)" funded by the European Commission. The project was financed by the European Union, grant No 2003104 (SI2.378322). Sole responsibility lies with the authors. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. (Permanent or incidental) project partners were: Belgium: Pascal Garel, European Hospital and Healthcare Federation (HOPE) Germany: Prof. Angela Brand, University of Applied Sciences of Bielefeld Peter Schäfer, Ministry of Employment, Health and Social Affairs NRW Hans-Willi Schemken, AOK Rheinland Heike Au, AOK Rheinland Julia Schröder, AOK Rheinland Dr Karl-Heinz Feldhoff, Municipal Health Service of Heinsberg Claudia Meier, Municipal Health Service of Heinsberg Jens Gabbe, Association of European Border Regions (AEBR) Martín Guillermo, Association of European Border Regions (AEBR) Dr Wolfgang Klitzsch, European
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Scenario Planning’ to Support a Regional Sustainability Transformation Vision: a Case Study from Blekinge, Sweden
    sustainability Article ‘Rapid Scenario Planning’ to Support a Regional Sustainability Transformation Vision: A Case Study from Blekinge, Sweden Giles Thomson *, Henrik Ny , Varvara Nikulina , Sven Borén, James Ayers and Jayne Bryant Department of Strategic Sustainable Development, Blekinge Institute of Technology (BTH), 371 79 Karlskrona, Sweden; [email protected] (H.N.); [email protected] (V.N.); [email protected] (S.B.); [email protected] (J.A.); [email protected] (J.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 10 July 2020; Accepted: 20 August 2020; Published: 26 August 2020 Abstract: This paper presents a case study of a transdisciplinary scenario planning workshop that was designed to link global challenges to local governance. The workshop was held to improve stakeholder integration and explore scenarios for a regional planning project (to 2050) in Blekinge, Sweden. Scenario planning and transdisciplinary practices are often disregarded by practitioners due to the perception of onerous resource requirements, however, this paper describes a ‘rapid scenario planning’ process that was designed to be agile and time-efficient, requiring the 43 participants from 13 stakeholder organizations to gather only for one day. The process was designed to create an environment whereby stakeholders could learn from, and with, each other and use their expert knowledge to inform the scenario process. The Framework for Strategic Sustainable Development (FSSD) was used to structure and focus the scenario planning exercise and its subsequent recommendations. The process was evaluated through a workshop participant survey and post-workshop evaluative interview with the regional government project manager to indicate the effectiveness of the approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Euroregion Baltic Council Expressing Position Towards an EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region
    Resolution adopted on 20 th November 2008 by Euroregion Baltic Council expressing position towards an EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Euroregion Baltic Council welcomes: the European Parliament resolution of 16 November 2006 on a Baltic Sea Region Strategy for the Northern Dimension; the declaration of the Council of Baltic Sea States of June 2007 on the development of a strategy for the Baltic Sea Region; the invitation of 14 December 2007 of the European Council to the European Commission to present an EU strategy for the Baltic Sea Region to the European Council in June 2009 ; the fact that the EU strategy for the Baltic Sea Region will be one of the top priorities for the upcoming Swedish presidency in the EU in the second half of 2009; the four objectives of the EU strategy for the Baltic Sea Region recommended by the European Commission to be: making the BSR environmentally clean, a prosperous place, an accessible and attractive place, and a safe and secure place; the fact that the EU strategy for the Baltic Sea Region will be accompanied by a rolling Action Plan, specifying roles and responsibilities of the different actors in the region and thus making the Strategy effective and relevant, as well as by an implementation timetable; the fact that the strategy Action Plan will be reviewed during the Polish presidency in the EU in the second half of 2011; the fact that so-called flagship projects will be proposed with a view of implementing specific actions of the strategy. Euroregion Baltic Council strongly believes that: the
    [Show full text]
  • EUROREGION BALTIC About Us
    EUROREGION BALTIC COOPERATING ACROSS BORDERS SINCE 1998 ABOUT ERB Background Established in 1998 Euroregion Baltic (ERB), is a politically solid and well- anchored cross-border cooperation platform in the south-east of the Baltic Sea region, representing regional authorities and local authorities’ associations in nine regions in five countries – Denmark (Bornholm), Sweden (Blekinge, Kalmar, Kronoberg, Skane Association of Local Authorities), Poland (Warmia-Masuria and Pomorskie Region, Association of Polish Communes of Euroregion Baltic), Lithuania (Klaipeda) and Russia (Kaliningrad). The political cooperation enacted by the Euroregion Baltic has allowed for the establishment of the South Baltic CBC Programme as joint efforts promoted within the Euroregion made it possible for the programme to be launched in 2007. As a result, the Euroregion Baltic could rapidly develop into project-based cross-border cooperation, focussing on the South Baltic seashores. one of the biggest maritime euroregions, created in 1998 first to include Russian partners hub for cross-border cooperation with focus on people-to-people projects strategic actions via Interreg projects promoting local and regional perspective in the Baltic Sea Region and EU (MLG) exchanging knowledge and good practice, building capacities for local actors. 2 Mission Since its foundation, Euroregion Baltic understood the importance of making use of EU opportunities to ensure the implementation of projects that could help the objectives of economic growth in the region: industry, agriculture, transport, communication, spatial planning, environmental protection, cooperation in the fields of science, education, tourism, health care, etc. The Euroregion’s mission is to undertake joint initiatives aiming at strengthening and promoting cooperation among the local and regional authorities of the Parties of the Agreement, as well as contributing to the sustainable development of the Baltic Sea Region, with particular focus on the South Baltic area.
    [Show full text]