Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 120/Friday, June 25, 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 120/Friday, June 25, 2021 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 120 / Friday, June 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules 33613 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR enter the Docket Number for this one of the methods listed in ADDRESSES. rulemaking: FWS–R2–ES–2020–0123. You must submit comments to http:// Fish and Wildlife Service Then, in the Search panel on the left www.regulations.gov before 11:59 p.m. side of the screen, under the Document (Eastern Time) on the date specified in 50 CFR Part 17 Type heading, click on the Proposed DATES. We will not consider hardcopy [Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2020–0123; Rules link to locate this document. You comments not postmarked by the date FXES11130200000–212–FF02ENEH00] may submit a comment by clicking on specified in DATES. ‘‘Comment Now!’’ We will post your entire comment— RIN 2018–BD61 By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail to: including your personal identifying Public Comments Processing, Attn: information—on http:// Endangered and Threatened Wildlife FWS–R2–ES–2020–0123, U.S. Fish and www.regulations.gov. If you provide and Plants; Revision of a Nonessential Wildlife Service, MS: PRB/3W, 5275 personal identifying information in your Experimental Population of Black- Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041– comment, you may request at the top of Footed Ferrets (Mustela nigripes) in 3803. your document that we withhold this the Southwest We will post all comments on http:// information from public review. AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, www.regulations.gov. This generally However, we cannot guarantee that we Interior. means that we will post any personal will be able to do so. ACTION: Proposed rule; announcement of information you provide us (see ‘‘Public The comments we receive and any a draft environmental assessment. Comments’’ below for more supporting documentation we used in information). preparing this proposal will be available SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Copies of Documents: The proposed for public inspection at http:// Wildlife Service (Service and USFWS), rule, draft EA, and supporting www.regulations.gov, or by propose to revise the regulation for the documents are available at the following appointment, during normal business nonessential experimental population of website: http://www.regulations.gov in hours at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife the black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes) Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2020–0123. Service, Arizona Ecological Services (ferret) in Arizona. We established the Persons who use a telecommunications Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Aubrey Valley Experimental Population device for the deaf (TDD) may call the CONTACT). Area (AVEPA) in 1996 in accordance Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–800– We specifically seek comments on: with section 10(j) of the Endangered 877–8339. • The appropriateness of revising the Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff current AVEPA, and establishing new This proposed rule would allow the Humphrey, Field Supervisor, Phone: boundaries for the nonessential reintroduction of ferrets across a larger 602–242–0210. Direct all questions or experimental population area to landscape as part of a nonessential requests for additional information to: encompass all potential ferret habitat experimental population and include BLACK-FOOTED FERRET QUESTIONS, within Arizona and identified Tribal the AVEPA within a larger ‘‘Southwest U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arizona lands in New Mexico and Utah, for Experimental Population Area’’ Ecological Services Office, 9828 North reintroduced populations of black- (SWEPA), which includes parts of 31st Avenue, Suite C3, Phoenix, AZ footed ferrets; Arizona and identified contiguous 85051. Individuals who are hearing- • Threats to ferrets in the proposed Tribal land in New Mexico and Utah. impaired or speech-impaired may call nonessential experimental population This proposed revision provides a the FRS at 1–800–877–8337 for TTY area that we have not considered in this framework for establishing and assistance. revision that might affect a reintroduced managing reintroduced populations of population; SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ferrets that will allow greater • The suitability of the proposed management flexibility and increased Public Comments boundaries for this nonessential landowner cooperation. The best experimental population; We want to ensure that any final rule • available data indicate that developed from this proposed revision The effects of reintroducing ferrets reintroduction of the ferret into suitable to the 1996 rule is as effective as on public, private, and Tribal lands and habitat in the proposed SWEPA is possible. Therefore, we invite Tribal and activities such as ranching, recreation, biologically feasible and will promote other governmental agencies, the residential development, and other land the conservation of the species. We are uses; and scientific community, industry, and • seeking comments on this proposal and other interested parties to submit The compatibility of this proposal on our draft environmental assessment comments (including recommendations with ongoing implementation of the (EA) that analyzes the potential and information) concerning any aspect programmatic ferret Safe Harbor environmental impacts associated with of this proposed revision. Your Agreement (SHA) in cooperation with the proposed regulatory revisions. comments should be as specific as non-Federal landowners. DATES: We will accept comments possible. Background received or postmarked on or before To issue a final rule implementing August 24, 2021. If you are using the this revision, we will take into Statutory and Regulatory Framework Federal eRulemaking Portal (see consideration all comments and The 1982 amendments to the ESA (16 ADDRESSES), the deadline for submitting information we receive. Such U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) included the an electronic comment is 11:59 p.m. communications may lead to a final rule addition of section 10(j) that allows for Eastern Time on this date. that differs from this proposed revision. the designation of reintroduced ADDRESSES: You may submit comments All comments, including commenters’ populations of listed species as on the proposed rule and draft EA by names and addresses, if provided to us, ‘‘experimental populations.’’ Our one of the following methods: will become part of the supporting implementing regulations for section Electronically: Go to the Federal record. 10(j) are in title 50 of the Code of eRulemaking Portal: http:// You may submit your comments Federal Regulations in part 17 www.regulations.gov. In the Search box, concerning the proposed revision by (specifically at 50 CFR 17.81); hereafter, VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:54 Jun 24, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM 25JNP1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 33614 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 120 / Friday, June 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules we refer to species-specific rules under Population Essential or Nonessential?’’ and consultation requirements per section 10(j) of the ESA as ‘‘10(j) rules.’’ below); subsections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2), These regulations state that the Service (3) management restrictions, respectively. We treat nonessential may designate a population of protective measures, or other special experimental populations outside of a endangered or threatened species that management concerns of that National Wildlife Refuge or NPS unit as we have released or will release into population, which may include but are species proposed for listing, and suitable natural habitat outside the not limited to, measures to isolate and/ agencies only follow subsections 7(a)(1) species’ current natural range, but or contain the experimental population and 7(a)(4). In these cases, nonessential within its probable historical range, as designated in the regulation from experimental population designation an experimental population. natural populations (see ‘‘Management provides additional flexibility, because Under 50 CFR 17.81(b), before Restrictions, Protective Measures, and it does not require Federal agencies to authorizing the release as an Other Special Management’’ below); and consult under section 7(a)(2). Instead, experimental population of any (4) a process for periodic review and section 7(a)(4) requires Federal agencies population of an endangered or evaluation of the success or failure of to confer (not consult) with the Service threatened species, the Service must the release and the effect of the release on actions that are likely to jeopardize find by regulation that such release will on the conservation and recovery of the the continued existence of a species further the conservation of the species. species (see ‘‘Review and Evaluation of proposed to be listed. A conference In making such a finding, the Service the Success or Failure of the SWEPA’’ results in conservation shall use the best scientific and below). recommendations, which are commercial data available to consider: Under 50 CFR 17.81(d), the Service discretionary. Because the nonessential shall consult with appropriate State fish (1) Any possible adverse effects on experimental population is, by and wildlife agencies, local extant populations of a species as a definition, not essential to the governmental entities [including Tribal result of removal of individuals, eggs, or continued existence of the species, the governments], affected Federal agencies, propagules for introduction elsewhere effects of proposed actions on the and affected private landowners in (see ‘‘Possible Adverse Effects on Wild population
Recommended publications
  • Plague Manual for Investigation
    Plague Summary Plague is a flea-transmitted bacterial infection of rodents caused by Yersinia pestis. Fleas incidentally transmit the infection to humans and other susceptible mammalian hosts. Humans may also contract the disease from direct contact with an infected animal. The most common clinical form is acute regional lymphadenitis, called bubonic plague. Less common clinical forms include septicemic, pneumonic, and meningeal plague. Pneumonic plague can be spread from person to person via airborne transmission, potentially leading to epidemics of primary pneumonic plague. Plague is immediately reportable to the New Mexico Department of Health. Plague is treatable with antibiotics, but has a high fatality rate with inadequate or delayed treatment. Plague preventive measures include: isolation of pneumonic plague patients; prophylactic treatment of pneumonic case contacts; avoiding contact with rodents and their fleas; reducing rodent harborage around the home; using flea control on pets; and, preventing pets from hunting. Agent Plague is caused by Yersinia pestis, a gram-negative, bi-polar staining, non-motile, non-spore forming coccobacillus. Transmission Reservoir: Wild rodents (especially ground squirrels) are the natural vertebrate reservoir of plague. Lagomorphs (rabbits and hares), wild carnivores, and domestic cats may also be a source of infection to humans. Vector: In New Mexico, the rock squirrel flea, Oropsylla montana, is the most important vector of plague for humans. Many more flea species are involved in the transmission of sylvatic (wildlife) plague. Mode of Transmission: Most humans acquire plague through the bites of infected fleas. Fleas can be carried into the home by pet dogs and cats, and may be abundant in woodpiles or burrows where peridomestic rodents such as rock squirrels (Spermophilus variegatus) have succumbed to plague infection.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Opinion
    u,s. É.IAH & WILDIIFE SEEVICE [Jnited States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Ecological Services 5353 Yellowstone Road, Suite 3084 Cheyenne, Wyoming 82009 In Reply Refer To: 06E13000-2015-F-0154 sEP 2 I 20þ Memorandum To: Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 6, Lakewood, Colorado From: Field Supervisor, U.S Field Ofhce, Cheyenne, Wyoming Subject Final Intraservice Biological Opinion on the Issuance of a New Federal Rule to Designate the Black-Footed Ferret as a Non-Essential Experimental Population in the State of Wyoming in Accordance with Section 10O of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as Amended This document transmits the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (Service) final Biological Opinion (BO) on the issuance of a new federal rule to designate the black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes) as a non-essential experimental population in the State of Wyoming in accordance with section 10O of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq. (ESA). Importantly, the overall effect of the proposed action will likely enhance the conservation and recovery of the species. This BO is based on the information provided in the Establishment of a Statewide Non-essential Experimental Population of Black-footed Ferrets in Wyoming (80 FR 19263, April 10, 2015), the Environmental Assessment for the Black-footed Ferret Wyoming Statewide 10O Rule, and fha Trrno îfìôO Ellnnlz (-1oo.onno Tlnnrrmanf 66Paar¡qlrrofi^- fho Rl^^L (tloo.onno Þrnnacc fnr fhp tltv Jutlv 4vvl ulvvl\ vrvqølrvv lJvvgruvrrt rwvvgru4Lrvrr ^fvr Luv urvv\ vrvsrsuvv r rvvvJJ rvr Luv Black-footed Ferret in Wyoming with Recommendations to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Plague Cases Reported Worldwide, Including in US
    ID Snapshot, Infectious Diseases ID Snapshot: Human plague cases reported worldwide, including in U.S. by H. Cody Meissner M.D., FAAP The largest epidemic of plague occurred between 1348 and 1351 in Europe. Medieval ships returning from Asia were swarming with infected rats that climbed ashore once in port. The infection spread from rats to fleas and from fleas to rats. Infection spread to humans after large numbers of infected rats died, forcing hungry fleas to bite other hosts. Dressed in a gown made of heavy, waxed fabric, the plague doctor also wore goggles and a mask with a beak that contained pungent substances to purify the air and help relieve the stench. The person also carried a pointer or rod to keep patients at a distance. Illustration courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine This pandemic of the Black Death (named after the purpuric lesions associated with disseminated intravascular coagulation) in the 14th century spread to every country in Europe killing one-third of the population. Doctors wore a costume (see illustration) when visiting patients. The mask and hat were intended to look like a deity to scare off the disease. The beak was filled with herbs and perfumes to offer protection against the unbearable stench. The long waxed raincoat and gloves were designed to prevent physical contact with a patient. One theory suggests the epidemic ended when the rodent reservoir in Europe (black rat) was replaced by the brown rat, which was not as prone to transmit the infection. Which one of the following statements about plague is not accurate? Copyright © 2016, The American Academy of Pediatrics ID Snapshot, Infectious Diseases a) Plague is a rare, life-threatening, flea-borne zoonosis caused by Yersinia pestis.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlling Plague in Gunnison's Prairie Dogs
    COLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE Plague in Gunnison’s Prairie Dogs MAY 2014 Controlling Plague in Gunnison’s Prairie Dogs Plague, caused by a non-native bacteria and carried by fleas can kill all prairie dogs in a colony, leading to local extinctions that threaten the overall survival of the Gunnison’s prairie dog (Cynomys gunnisoni) in Colorado. Unmanaged plague has the potential to reduce populations of the Gunnison’s prairie dog to the point that a listing as federally endangered or threatened becomes more likely. Such a listing would not only underscore the need for additional conservation, it could also limit land uses for agriculture and recreation. The Gunnison’s prairie dog serves key roles in southwest Colorado’s biological landscapes: • A food source for many wildlife species including raptors and mammalian carnivores. • Prairie dog colonies serve as habitat for mountain plover, burrowing owl, badger, weasel, snakes and other wildlife species. Research Objectives Since the Gunnison’s prairie dog is an important species in the state’s ecosystem, Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) has determined that controlling plague in this species is a priority conservation action. The CPW goal is to develop plague management tools to help manage and stabilize Gunnison’s prairie dog populations on public lands and in cooperation with willing landowners. CPW Plague Control Research Success The U.S. Geological Survey’s National Wildlife Health Center developed a sylvatic plague vaccine (SPV) and tested the vaccine in the lab in 2010. That laboratory research demonstrated that the vaccine is safe and protects prairie dogs from plague. Field trials are necessary to confirm these findings in the wild.
    [Show full text]
  • Prairie Dog (Cynomys Ludovicianus) in Canada
    Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series Management Plan for the Black-tailed prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus) in Canada Black-tailed Prairie Dog June 2009 About the Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series What is the Species at Risk Act (SARA)? SARA is the Act developed by the federal government as a key contribution to the common national effort to protect and conserve species at risk in Canada. SARA came into force in 2003, and one of its purposes is “to manage species of special concern to prevent them from becoming endangered or threatened.” What is a species of special concern? Under SARA, a species of special concern is a wildlife species that could become threatened or endangered because of a combination of biological characteristics and identified threats. Species of special concern are included in the SARA List of Wildlife Species at Risk. What is a management plan? Under SARA, a management plan is an action-oriented planning document that identifies the conservation activities and land use measures needed to ensure, at a minimum, that a species of special concern does not become threatened or endangered. For many species, the ultimate aim of the management plan will be to alleviate human threats and remove the species from the List of Wildlife Species at Risk. The plan sets goals and objectives, identifies threats, and indicates the main areas of activities to be undertaken to address those threats. Management plan development is mandated under Sections 65–72 of SARA (http://www.sararegistry.gc.ca/approach/act/default_e.cfm). A management plan has to be developed within three years after the species is added to the List of Wildlife Species at Risk.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Wild Carnivore Serology in Determining Patterns of Plague Activity in Rodents in California Charles R
    THE USE OF WILD CARNIVORE SEROLOGY IN DETERMINING PATTERNS OF PLAGUE ACTIVITY IN RODENTS IN CALIFORNIA CHARLES R. SMITH and BERNARD C. NELSON, Calffornla Department of Health Services, Vector Biology and Control Branch, Redding. California 96001, and Berkeley. California 94704 ALLANM. BARNES, Chief, Plague Branch, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control, Ft. Collins, Colorado 80522 ABSTRACT: Carnivores obtain plague infection through ingestion of infected rodents or rabbits or via flea bite. Most are resistant to infection, show little or no symptoms, and produce antibodies to Yersinia pestis which may persist for several months . Consequently, carnivores can be used as serolo­ gical plague sentinels using the specific passive or indirect hemagglutination test in the laboratory. A carnivore serology program for plague detection began in California in 1974. The program is a cooperative effort incorporating state and federal vector-borne disease units and state and federal predator animal control personnel. The program has proven to be an important tool in the overall statewide plague surveillance program of the California Department of Health Services, and has been effective in detecting plague over broad geographical areas of the state, as well as in areas hereto­ fore unknown to experience plague activity. Carnivore serology has also proven useful in helping to delineate the extent of plague epizootics, and has given insight into the patterns of enzootic plague among wild rodent populations. INTRODUCTION Bubonic plague is a disease of rodents caused by the bacterium Yersinia pestis, which exists in widespread discontinuous foci in portions of Africa, Asia, and the Americas.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Field Studies to Assess The
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Photo courtesy of Dean Biggins, USGS FIELD STUDIES TO ASSESS THE SAFETY OF SYLVATIC PLAGUE VACCINE IN PRAIRIE DOGS AND NON-TARGET ANIMALS April 2012 Prepared by: United States Geological Survey National Wildlife Health Center 6006 Schroeder Road Madison, WI 53711 USGS-NWHC Environmental Assessment: Field Studies to Assess the Safety of Sylvatic Plague Vaccine in Prairie Dogs and Non-Target Animals TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 5 2. HISTORY ................................................................................................................................ 6 3. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE ACTION ...................................................................... 6 3.1 Decision to be made .......................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Scoping and issues ............................................................................................................. 8 3.2.1 Actions analyzed ...................................................................................................... 8 3.2.2 Site specificity .......................................................................................................... 8 3.3 Summary of public involvement .......................................................................................8 4. ALTERNATIVES INCLUDING THE PROPOSED ACTION ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Conents
    Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series Black-footed Ferret Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series Recovery Strategy for the Black-footed Ferret (Mustela nigripes) in Canada Black-footed Ferret June 2009 About the Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series What is the Species at Risk Act (SARA)? SARA is the Act developed by the federal government as a key contribution to the common national effort to protect and conserve species at risk in Canada. SARA came into force in 2003 and one of its purposes is “to provide for the recovery of wildlife species that are extirpated, endangered or threatened as a result of human activity.” What is recovery? In the context of species at risk conservation, recovery is the process by which the decline of an endangered, threatened or extirpated species is arrested or reversed, and threats are removed or reduced to improve the likelihood of the species’ persistence in the wild. A species will be considered recovered when its long-term persistence in the wild has been secured. What is a recovery strategy? A recovery strategy is a planning document that identifies what needs to be done to arrest or reverse the decline of a species. It sets goals and objectives and identifies the main areas of activities to be undertaken. Detailed planning is done at the action plan stage. Recovery strategy development is a commitment of all provinces and territories and of three federal agencies — Environment Canada, Parks Canada Agency and Fisheries and Oceans Canada — under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Sylvatic Plague Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions
    Sylvatic Plague Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions PLAGUE Q: What is plague? A: Plague is a disease caused by bacteria called Yersinia pestis. It is transmitted by fleas and afflicts many kinds of mammals, includ ing humans. In the Un ited States, 10-20 people are diagnosed with plague each year. The disease is treatable with antibiotics. Q: What are the symptoms of plague? A: Symptoms usually start 2-6 days after becoming infected. Symptoms include fever, chills, weakness, and swollen and painful lymph nodes. The infection can spread from the lymph nodes to other parts of the body, including the lungs. There are three types of plague: bubonic (infection of the lymph nodes), septicemic (infection of the blood), and pneumonic (infection of the lungs). Pneumonic plague can be spread from person-to-person and must be treated immediately to prevent death. Q: How do you contract plague? A: Most often, people become infected by being bitten by infected fleas. People may also become infected by handling infected animals or their tissues. People can also become infected by breathing in the bacteria, such as from other people or animals with pneumonic plague who are coughing. Q: Where does plague occur in the U.S.? A: Most human cases in the United States occur in two regions: 1) northern New Mexico, northern Arizona, and southern Colorado; and 2) California, southern Oregon, and far western Nevada. Q: Why should I be worried about plague in wildlife? A: Wild animals, especially rodents, can act as a source of plague for people and their pets.
    [Show full text]
  • Sylvatic Plague Vaccine Partially Protects Prairie Dogs (Cynomys Spp.) in Field Trials
    EcoHealth DOI: 10.1007/s10393-017-1253-x Ó 2017 The Author(s). This article is an open access publication Original Contribution Sylvatic Plague Vaccine Partially Protects Prairie Dogs (Cynomys spp.) in Field Trials Tonie E. Rocke,1 Daniel W. Tripp,2 Robin E. Russell,1 Rachel C. Abbott,1 Katherine L.D. Richgels,1 Marc R. Matchett,3 Dean E. Biggins,4 Randall Griebel,5 Greg Schroeder,6 Shaun M. Grassel,7 David R. Pipkin,8 Jennifer Cordova,9 Adam Kavalunas,10 Brian Maxfield,11 Jesse Boulerice,12 and Michael W. Miller2 1U.S. Geological Survey, National Wildlife Health Center, 6006 Schroeder Rd., Madison, WI 53711 2Colorado Division of Parks and Wildlife, Wildlife Health Program, 4330 Laporte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 3U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge, Lewistown, MT 4U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, 2150 Centre Ave, #C, Fort Collins, CO 5U.S. Forest Service, P.O. Box 425, Wall, SD 6U.S. National Park Service, Wind Cave National Park, 26611 Highway 385, Hot Springs, SD 7Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, Department of Wildlife, Fish and Recreation, P.O. Box 246, Lower Brule, SD 8U.S. Department of Agriculture, APHIS, Wildlife Services, WTAMU, P.O. Box 60277, Canyon, TX 9Arizona Game and Fish Department, P.O. Box 397, Seligman, AZ 10Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, 1470 North Airport Rd., Cedar City, UT 11Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, 318 North Vernal Ave., Vernal, UT 12Wyoming Game and Fish Department, 528 South Adams Street, Laramie, WY Abstract: Sylvatic plague, caused by Yersinia pestis, frequently afflicts prairie dogs (Cynomys spp.), causing population declines and local extirpations.
    [Show full text]
  • Spread of Sylvatic Plague Among Black-Tailed Prairie Dogs Is
    Journal of Wildlife Management 75(2):357–368; 2011; DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.40 Research Article Spread of Plague Among Black-Tailed Prairie Dogs Is Associated With Colony Spatial Characteristics TAMMI L. JOHNSON,1 Montana Ecology of Infectious Diseases, Organismal Biology and Ecology, Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA JACK F. CULLY, JR., USGS-BRD Kansas Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA SHARON K. COLLINGE, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Environmental Studies Program, University of Colorado-Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA CHRIS RAY, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado-Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA CHRISTOPHER M. FREY, Arthur Temple College of Forestry and Agriculture, Stephen F. Austin State University, Nacogdoches, TX 75962, USA BRETT K. SANDERCOCK, Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA ABSTRACT Sylvatic plague (Yersinia pestis) is an exotic pathogen that is highly virulent in black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus) and causes widespread colony losses and individual mortality rates >95%. We investigated colony spatial characteristics that may influence inter-colony transmission of plague at 3 prairie dog colony complexes in the Great Plains. The 4 spatial characteristics we considered include: colony size, Euclidean distance to nearest neighboring colony, colony proximity index, and distance to nearest drainage (dispersal)
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 80, No. 210/Friday, October 30, 2015/Rules and Regulations
    Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 210 / Friday, October 30, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 66821 may visit http://www.regulations.gov/ DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Yellowstone Road, Suite 308A, search/footer/privacyanduse.jsp Cheyenne, WY 82009; telephone 307– Fish and Wildlife Service 772–2374. Persons who use a List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 175 telecommunications device for the deaf 50 CFR Part 17 Air carriers, Hazardous materials (TDD) may call the Federal Information transportation, Radioactive materials, [Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2015–0013; Relay Services (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. Reporting and recordkeeping FXES11130900000C6–145–FF09E42000] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: requirements. RIN 1018–BA42 Mark Sattelberg, Field Supervisor, Telephone: 307–772–2374. Direct all In consideration of the foregoing, we Endangered and Threatened Wildlife questions or requests for additional amend 49 CFR Chapter I as follows: and Plants; Establishment of a information to: BLACK–FOOTED FERRET QUESTIONS, U.S. Fish and PART 175—CARRIAGE BY AIRCRAFT Nonessential Experimental Population of Black-footed Ferrets in Wyoming Wildlife Service, Wyoming Ecological Services Field Office, 5353 Yellowstone ■ 1. The authority citation for part 175 AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Road, Suite 308A, Cheyenne, WY continues to read as follows: Interior. 82009. Individuals who are hearing- Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128, 44701; 49 ACTION: Final rule. impaired or speech-impaired may call the Federal Relay Service at 1–800–877– CFR 1.81 and 1.97. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish
    [Show full text]