DOCSLIB.ORG

Dear Chair Kiffmeyer and Members of the Committee: Don't Take Away

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dear Chair Kiffmeyer and Members of the Committee: Don't Take Away Dear Chair Kiffmeyer and members of the Committee: Don’t take away local rights. Local governments know what is best for their communities. I urge you to remove the anti-local control, anti-Ranked Choice Voting measure from the SF 1831 omnibus bill. Sincerely, Karen Schultz 5304 Fremont Ave S Minneapolis, MN 55419 --Hi. My name is Jennifer Schally. I live in Stillwater. I am a 5th generation Minnesotan. It's shocking that Senator Mary Kiffmeyer, a small government Republican, is literally using the boot of big state gov't to stomp on small local gov't by trying to pass this preemption law stopping small gov'ts to make their own decisions of Ranked Choice Voting. That is shocking hypocrisy & goes completely against the Republican party platform of supporting small gov't. Chair Kiffmeyer and members of the Committee: Don’t take away local rights. Local governments know what is best for their communities. I urge you to remove the anti-local control, anti-Ranked Choice Voting measure from the SF 1831 omnibus bill. Sincerely, Jennifer Schally 1104 Creekside Cir Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Chair Kiffmeyer and members of the Committee: Please consider the benefits of RCV rather than seeking to ban it. It gives us all more voice on what and who we vote for. Sincerely, Thomas Alcivar 7201 Mt Curve Rd Minneapolis, MN 55438 Please do not take away local rights by banning ranked choice voting. Local governments, that I am sure you support and represent, can determine what method is best for their communities and can successfully adapt if new methods are selected. Please respect the will and resourcefulness of local leaders. Therefore, I urge you to remove the measure from the SF 1831 omnibus bill that would prevent ranked choice voting from being implemented by local governments. Sincerely, Ryan Swanson 10036 105th St Milaca, MN 56353 Dear Chair Kiffmeyer and members of the Committee: I urge you to remove the anti-local control, anti-Ranked Choice Voting measure from the SF 1831 omnibus bill. Rank choice voting will help give voters more options and I believe will help create an elected busy that is willing to work together. Sincerely, Zhexin Zhang 1455 Bethesda Cir Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Chair Kiffmeyer and members of the Committee: Our founders were very concerned about having majority rule, and Abigail Adams, wife of an early president, wanted a way for women to be adequately elected. RCV is that way! Don’t take away local rights. Local governments know what is best for their communities. Also, RCV helps lower the temperature of our political discourse, away from discord. I urge you to remove the anti-local control, anti-Ranked Choice Voting measure from the SF 1831 omnibus bill. Sincerely, Diane Steen-Hinderlie 2829 Yosemite Ave S Minneapolis, MN 55416 Dear Chair Kiffmeyer and members of the Committee: Please just stop being anti-democratic, voting is our most important right and everyone's voice should be heard. Don’t take away local rights. Local governments know what is best for their communities. I urge you to remove the anti-local control, anti-Ranked Choice Voting measure from the SF 1831 omnibus bill. Sincerely, ANTHONY PIERCE 1235 Raymond Ave Saint Paul, MN 55108 Dear Chair Kiffmeyer and members of the Committee: Don’t take away local rights. Local governments know what is best for their communities. I urge you to remove the anti-local control, anti-Ranked Choice Voting measure from the SF 1831 omnibus bill. Sincerely, Ryan Featherstone 8319 Cedarview Cir Savage, MN 55378 Dear Chair Kiffmeyer and members of the Committee: Rank Choice Voting promotes democracy. It should be a bipartisan effort because everyone benefits from RCV. The public is encouraged to vote rather than feeling defeated before they even go to the polls. RCV eliminates the spoiler ballot. You need to support RCV and stop opposing it. Don’t take away local rights. Local governments know what is best for their communities. I urge you to remove the anti-local control, anti-Ranked Choice Voting measure from the SF 1831 omnibus bill. Sincerely, Katherine Schafer 3225 Aldrich Ave S Minneapolis, MN 55408 Dear Chair Kiffmeyer and members of the Committee: Don’t take away local rights. Local governments know what is best for their communities. Attempting to do so is anti-democratic in my view. I urge you to remove the anti-local control, anti-Ranked Choice Voting measure from the SF 1831 omnibus bill. Sincerely, Barbara Speedling 9530 Grand Ave S Minneapolis, MN 55420 Dear Chair Kiffmeyer and members of the Committee: Don’t take away local rights. Local governments know what is best for their communities. We have been using RCV in several Minnesota cities with great success for more than a few years. It is neither complicated nor confusing. When St. Paul first used RCV for its mayoral election, I volunteered outside a busy polling place (at a legal distance, of course) to answer any voter questions. I do not recall anyone having any questions. I cannot think of an ethical, intellectually honest reason to be opposed to Ranked Choice Voting. So my conclusion is that some politicians (from both major parties) see RCV, with its enhanced democracy and voter choice, as a threat to their entrenched power and electability. I urge you to remove the anti-local control, anti-Ranked Choice Voting measure from the SF 1831 omnibus bill. Sincerely, Steven Zekowski 2341 Copperfield Dr Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Chair Kiffmeyer and members of the Committee: I am a voter in Saint Louis Park. Please do not take away Ranked Choice Voting from my city. Local governments know what is best for their communities. We have chosen RCV and we like it. I think that our state-wide elections would benefit from RCV and the elected officials would have greater support. I urge you to remove the anti-local control, anti-Ranked Choice Voting measure from the SF 1831 omnibus bill. Sincerely, Timothy Bardell 2333 Parkwoods Rd Minneapolis, MN 55416 Dear Chair Kiffmeyer and members of the Committee: Taking away local government rights is going in the opposite direction from what is needed to protect our democracy -- we must give voice at all levels of government. Local governments know what is best for their communities. I urge you to remove the anti-local control, anti-Ranked Choice Voting measure from the SF 1831 omnibus bill. And I urge you to give a hearing to SF 218 which would allow adoption of RCV statewide. RCV will be a game changer in reducing the polarization, gridlock, and negativity in our society. Sincerely, Cecily HInes 1120 S 2nd St Minneapolis, MN 55415 Dear Chair Kiffmeyer and members of the Committee: As a Catholic, I am a firm believer in the principle of subsidiarity and the value of local control. The state government should not interfere with voter's rights to determine how their local elections are run, so long as these elections are free, fair, and accessible. Voters know what is best for their communities. I urge you to remove the anti-local control, anti-Ranked Choice Voting measure from the SF 1831 omnibus bill. Sincerely, Patrick Cruitt 2633 Pillsbury Ave Minneapolis, MN 55408 Dear Chair Kiffmeyer and members of the Committee: Don’t take away local rights. Local governments know what is best for their communities. I urge you to remove the anti-local control, anti-Ranked Choice Voting measure from the SF 1831 omnibus bill. Additionally I urge you to support SF 218 to allow Ranked Choice Voting statewide. This is a proven way to encourage more candidates and more voter participation in a true democratic way. Thank you for this consideration. Sincerely, Larry Day 1805 Ives Ln N Plymouth, MN 55441 Dear Chair Kiffmeyer and members of the Committee: Ranked Choice Voting better reflects voter preferences and should be implemented in MN. I had no idea why you are trying to suppress a policy that would give voters a clearer voice in choosing their leaders. Sincerely, Mary Yee 6704 West Trail Minneapolis, MN 55439 Dear Chair Kiffmeyer and members of the Committee: Don’t take away local rights. Local governments know what is best for their communities. I urge you to remove the anti-local control, anti-Ranked Choice Voting measure from the SF 1831 omnibus bill. Sincerely, cindy banchy 13776 Danbury Path Rosemount, MN 55068 Dear Chair Kiffmeyer and members of the Committee: I support Ranked Choice Voting, at every level. I think it is more democratic than the traditional winner take all, first-past-the-post system. It's easy to understand, broadens participation, and my personal experience with it, in my city, has been nothing but positive. Other cities in Minnesota should be able to try it if they want to. I urge you to remove the anti-local control, anti-Ranked Choice Voting measure from the SF 1831 omnibus bill. Sincerely, Jeff Nygaard 2609 S 6th St Minneapolis, MN 55454 Dear Chair Kiffmeyer and members of the Committee: Too often, when there are multiple candidates in an election the victor receives less than 40% of the vote. In partisan races, a minor party's candidate can "spoil" results for a major party candidate, resulting in a victor the majority of voters did not want. Last year, some candidates were even recruited and supported with the specific intent of spoiling the election. Partisan elections have been tending to advance extreme candidates, leaving little room for moderates to claim a middle ground. We can do better than this. Please allow local governments to continue to choose solutions that allow them to best determine and reflect the will of their voters.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • April 2002 Minnesota Journal
    LEAGUE Volume 19, Number 4 April 16, 2002 No factor holds more potential for leveraging change than the wayMinnesotafinanceshigh- lt'snot whatyouspend, it's howyouspend it er education. The current sys- tem is inefficient, bears no by Governor Jesse Ventura relationship to quality perfor mance, assures high subsi- State government manages its budget. I'm not ment and its goals, and sets out how they'll show dies to those who need them talking about the $400 million a year of cuts citizens whether they have succeeded. least, is unresponsive to the that we've been arguing about since November, Each commissioner has identified five to 10 of most important student and but the other $23 billion a year that will be left these result measures that will make the most public needs, and applies when the legislature has gone home. That's still sense to Minnesotans. For example, Corrections no pressures or incentives a lot of taxpayer money, and there is a lot that is accountable for per day costs for prisoners, to meet the challenges of a we can-and will40 with it. The legislature Children, Families and Learning for third grade competitive future. and the lobbyists and the media spend five or six reading rates, and Pollution Control for -David B. Laird, Jr, months every year focusing on proposed changes statewide air pollution rates. President, Minnesota Private to a fraction of the budget. But over 95 percent There is also a lead department for each of our the money is in the base, and stays pretty 29 "Big Plan" initiatives.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Bush Fellows Summit
    Bush Foundation Givin STRENGTH g for Vibrant Communities and Vital Leadership Volume 5, Issue 1 January 2008 Bush Fellows Summit In this issue of Giving Strength, we have a lot to celebrate. The Bush Fellows Summit was an incredible experience, and in the words of our new president Peter Hutchinson, “The commitment of our fellows to improving the region is impressive.” Look for photos, comments from the participants and a summary of what the fellows contributed beginning on page 9. The new year also finds the Foundation poised between the past and the future. We report on the experience of two fellows with the I-35W bridge collapse, the top story of 2007 around the region. We also ask our grantees for a short “time-out” from our old way of doing business so we can make way for new programs to be created by summer. See Peter’s letter on page 3 for more specifics. On our cover, some faces of the first-ever Bush Fellows Summit: (from top left) Sharon Radd (BLF’06), Mark Tang (BAF’97), Joi Lewis (BLF’06) and Ruth Thomas (BLF’86). At left, Areca, an oil on paper work by Vesna Kittelson (BAF’90), tries to overhear the conversation between Dipankar Mukherjee (BLF’05) and another guest at the art crawl and reception that served as the kick-off to the Summit. Photographer, Tom Roster Calendar January 2008 June 2008 Letters of inquiry for March proposal deadline due (1st) Orientation for 2008 Bush Artist Fellows Program Regional Arts Development Program II applicants for full Bush Artist Fellows Program honors fellows and awardees proposals selected
    [Show full text]
  • Battlegrounds Poll-September 2005
    Battleground States Poll - October 31, 2006 October 31, 2006 Gubernatorial Races Democrats stand poised to make gains in the nation's governorships, though they lost the lead in several battleground states in the latest poll and their advantage in several other races is razor thin. In the latest Battleground States Poll, Democratic candidates were ahead in 11 races, while Republicans led in five and three races were tied. In a poll earlier this month, Democrats were ahead in 13, Republicans in five and one was tied. Zogby Interactive, in cooperation with The Wall Street Journal Online, is conducting a series of online polls that track 19 gubernatorial races. The latest polls were conducted Oct. 23-27 and have margins of error that range from 2.8 to 4.4 percentage points per candidate. Taking into account governorships that aren't up for re-election and those that weren't included in the battleground polling because the incumbent party is widely expected to remain in power, the Democrats would hold 26 governorships and Republicans 21, if the results on Election Day were to match the latest polling. The Democratic leads in five states, though, are within the polls' margins of error. A division of power akin to what the Zogby polls suggest would mark a reversal from the current balance. Today, Republicans hold 28 governorships and Democrats 22. Three states that were shaded blue in the prior poll -- Colorado, Wisconsin and Oregon -- are gray this time around. In Colorado, Republican Bob Beauprez, who was nine percentage points behind as recently as early September, pulled even with Democrat Bill Ritter.
    [Show full text]
  • Diverse Supporters of Early Learning Scholarships Excerpts from Letters in Hearing Packet
    Diverse Supporters of Early Learning Scholarships Excerpts from Letters in Hearing Packet “The need for Scholarships is great. We have had waiting lists of more than 700 in recent years in the counties we serve.” Jon Losness, Families First of Minnesota “Early Learning Scholarships 1) create consumer demand to fuel recovery of the devastated child care sector and 2) empower low-income families to access the quality child care programs that help children avoid falling into opportunity and achievement gaps.” Jan Kruchoski and Fred Senn, Early Care and Education Crisis Work Group “Despite the pandemic, 79% of our children 0-5 experienced age-appropriate development toward school readiness in 4 out of 6 domains of development and 90% of these had an Early Learning Scholarship.” Sondra Samuels, Northside Achievement Zone “The Minnesota Business Partnership supports expansion of early learning scholarships to additional low-income families throughout Minnesota. High-quality education programs have been shown to improve school readiness, reduce grade retention and special education, and increase high school graduation rates and college enrollment.” Amy Walstein, Minnesota Business Partnership “47% of scholarships are currently supporting children in Greater Minnesota… We have seen Early Learning Scholarships work across our region. Northeastern Minnesota has the highest participation of licensed child care centers and homes in the Parent Aware System.” Tony Sertich, Northland Foundation “High quality research demonstrates that early learning
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report JULY 1, 2017 – JUNE 30, 2018 Adrienne Diercks, Founder and Jody Rodrigues, Executive Director Board Chair
    Annual Report JULY 1, 2017 – JUNE 30, 2018 Adrienne Diercks, Founder and Jody Rodrigues, Executive Director Board Chair Connecting students to their purpose for 25 years. Project Success was born in 1994 because we saw an opportunity to help more young people thrive in life and prepare for their futures. Over time, our team has established a proven model of innovative experience learning that has transformed thousands of students’ lives. 25 years later, more than 100,000 students have benefitted from our program. We have strong, clear outcomes to prove this is a model that works – increased graduation rates, GPAs, and all- around academic performance. We must do more for our students and families, continuing to innovate our programming and involve Julia Mann more students, because we know this work is important. in the Anwatin Middle School Our students need us. They need as many caring adults in their Musical, 2003 lives as possible and access to experiences that help them see a clear connection between school and their future careers. They need support to build social and emotional skills for a successful “Project Success makes you feel like transition to adulthood. you are capable of anything, and Our schools need us. They need strong, proven partnerships to support every student’s career, post-secondary school exploration you have cheerleaders to support and preparedness for life after high school. Our schools continue you on your journey. It is a real to give us access to class time for workshops, expeditions, and arts, because they understand the power of our programming in community and they will welcome reaching their students.
    [Show full text]
  • WILLIAM D. GREEN Department of History
    WILLIAM D. GREEN Department of History Augsburg College 2211 Riverside Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55454 Phone: 612-330-1199 e-mail: [email protected] EDUCATION J.D., University of Minnesota (1989) Ph.D., University of Minnesota (1976) M.A., University of Minnesota (1976) B.A., Gustavus Adolphus College (1972) ACADEMIC POSITIONS Associate Professor of History, Augsburg College (2000 - present) Taught courses or lectured at Department of Leadership, Policy & Organization, Peabody College (Vanderbilt University), St. John's University, Carleton College, Macalester College, and Hamline University School of Law Sabbatical leave granted (2000 - 2001) Promoted to Associate Professor, Augsburg College (2000) Assistant Professor of History, Augsburg College (1991 - 2000) COURSES REGULARLY TAUGHT American legal history, history of civil rights, Minnesota history, history of African American religion, African American Experience, history of African American education RECOGNITION Recipient, Minnesota SPJ 2004 Page One Award, 2d place (2004) for the article "How to Survive Being Elected to the School Board," Minnesota Law & Politics (Spring, 2004) Inductee, Minnesota State Boards Association "All-State School Board" (2002) Recognition of Service, West Metropolitan Education Project Joint Powers Board (2002) Profiled, "Tales Out of School/An Exit Interview with Minneapolis School Board Member Bill Green" by Britt Robson, City Pages (January 2, 2002) Recipient, Minnesota Humanities Commission Grant (2001) Listed, "One of the Smartest 100 People in Minnesota," Minnesota Journal of Law and Politics (October, 1999) Profiled, "The World According to Chairman Bill," Minnesota Journal of Law and Politics (August, 1998) Profiled, "School Board Chief Remains Focused on Helping Kids" by Doug Grow, Minneapolis Star Tribune, Metro section (February 4, 1998) Recipient, Minnesota Historical Society Research Fellowship (1998 - 1999) Recipient, Solon S.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Elections
    Minnesota Elections Chapter Ten Minnesota Elections Minnesota Election Results History Voter Turnout Since 1950 .........................................................................478 Gubernatorial Election Results Since 1857 ...............................................480 Presidential Election Results Since 1860 ..................................................485 Minnesota Election Results 2020 March 3, 2020 Presidential Nomination Primary .....................................491 August 11 2020 State Primary...................................................................494 November 3, 2020 State General Election ..........................................................502 Results by Legislative District ...................................................................512 Minnesota in a Pandemic Masked Indigenous Minnesotans and supporters demonstrate at a "We are Here to Protect the Water, Revoke the Permits!" Rally in St. Paul on January 29, 2021. "We Are Here to to Protect the Water, Revoke the Permits! Rally in St Paul, Minnesota" by Lorie Shaull is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0 Minnesota Elections 478 Minnesota Voter Turnout Since 1950 100 General Elections 80 60 Primary Elections 40 Statewide Voter Turnout Percentage Turnout Statewide Voter 20 0 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Minnesota Elections MINNESOTA PRIMARY ELECTION STATISTICS 1950 – 2018 % OF ELECTION DAY YEAR ELIGIBLE VOTED ELIGIBLE REGISTRATIONS % OF VOTES VOTERS WHO VOTED (EDR) FROM EDR 1950 1,879,000 583,617 31.06 1952 1,899,000 652,825 34.38 1954
    [Show full text]
  • The Price of Government Getting the Results We Need in an Age of Permanent Fiscal Crisis
    The Price of Government Getting the Results We Need in an Age of Permanent Fiscal Crisis David Osborne (co-author of Reinventing Government) and Peter Hutchinson Government is broke. The 2004 federal deficit will set a record. The states have suffered three years of record shortfalls. Cities, counties and school districts are laying off policemen and teachers, closing schools, and cutting services. Government leaders have patched together combinations of accounting gimmicks, one time fixes, real cuts, and tax and fee increases to relieve the fiscal pain. But it won’t go away. Overall, American governments are enduring their worst fiscal crisis since World War II. But this one will be permanent. On one side are skyrocketing costs for health care, Social Security and pensions. On the other is opposition to tax increases. In the face of this crisis the bankrupt ideologies of left and right offer little guidance. The Price of Government goes beyond left and right to show a third way: a results-based government that can give citizens the outcomes they want at a price they are willing to pay. The Price of Government begins by describing a radically different approach to budgeting – Budgeting for Outcomes - that focuses on buying results for citizens rather than cutting or adding to last year’s spending programs. It goes on to show how leaders can use consolidation, competition, customer choice, and a relentless focus on results to save millions while improving public services, at all levels of government. In government, as in most realms of life, we find it safer and easier to do what we’ve always done, simply because we’ve always done it.
    [Show full text]
  • Last Revised 90/30/06
    ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY SURVEY STATEWIDE SURVEY OF MINNESOTA ADULTS FALL 2006 LAST REVISED 90/30/06 NOTE: DUE TO GRAPHICS SOME PAGES MAY LOAD SLOWLY DR. STEPHEN FRANK DR. STEVEN WAGNER DR. MICHELLE KUKOLECA HAMMES [ON LEAVE FROM SURVEY] Principal Investigators SCSU Survey Social Science Research Institute College of Social Sciences St. Cloud State University St. Cloud, Minnesota I. QUESTIONS RELATED TO FALL 2006 ELECTION-GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS II. WOMEN AND POLITICS - FORTHCOMING III. OTHER- FORTHCOMING QUESTIONS RELATED TO FALL 2006 ELECTION-GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS (INITIAL RELEASE 10-30—THE REPORT WILL BE EXPANDED OVER THE NEXT FEW DAYS] ANNUAL ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY SURVEY FALL STATEWIDE SURVEY DIRECTION OF THE STATE MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM WHICH PARTY CAN BETTER FIX THE PROBLEM PRESIDENT BUSH’S PERFORMANCE IRAQ WAR FEELING THERMOMETER UNITED STATE SENATE RACE MINNESOTA GUBERNATORIAL RACE STEPHEN I. FRANK PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE CO-DIRECTOR, SCSU SURVEY COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY STEVEN C. WAGNER PROFESSOR AND CHAIRPERSON, DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE CO-DIRECTOR, SCSU SURVEY COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY MICHELLE KUKOLECA HAMMES ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE CO-DIRECTOR, SCSU SURVEY COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY OCTOBER 31, 2006 INTRODUCTION TO THE REPORT AND METHODS The SCSU Survey is an ongoing survey research extension of the Social Science Research Institute in the College of Social Sciences at St. Cloud State University. The SCSU Survey performs its research in the form of telephone interviews. Dr. Stephen Frank began the survey in 1980 conducting several omnibus surveys a year of central Minnesota adults in conjunction with his Political Science classes.
    [Show full text]
  • Source: Minnesota Legislative Manual 2007/2008
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/mngov/electionresults.aspx Chapter Nine Minnesota Votes 456 NOVEMBER 7, 2006, STATE GENERAL ELECTION Chapter Nine Votes Minnesota VOTER REGISTRATION AND VOTER PARTICIPATION BY COUNTY PERSONS REGISTERED PERSONS REGISTERING ON PERSONS VOTING BY PERSONS VOTING BY TOTAL NUMBER OF COUNTY AS OF 7AM ELECTION DAY ABSENTEE REGULAR ABSENTEE FEDERAL PERSONS VOTING AITKIN 10,462 836 797 3 8,197 ANOKA 183,406 16,848 7,104 49 133,965 BECKER 18,797 1,599 1,144 0 13,481 BELTRAMI 23,606 2,727 1,133 4 17,139 BENTON 20,808 2,073 753 0 14,362 BIG STONE 3,335 124 255 0 2,785 BLUE EARTH 36,675 4,884 1,294 5 25,680 BROWN 15,088 1,626 751 0 11,753 CARLTON 19,603 1,712 827 0 14,259 CARVER 50,531 5,052 2,137 0 36,438 CASS 18,136 1,106 1,239 0 12,620 CHIPPEWA 7,342 593 332 1 5,541 CHISAGO 31,190 3,112 1,145 1 22,007 CLAY 30,945 3,322 1,079 0 19,685 CLEARWATER 5,054 405 272 0 3,843 COOK 3,424 238 180 9 2,924 COTTONWOOD 6,867 540 390 0 5,422 CROW WING 36,799 3,249 2,597 10 27,670 DAKOTA 234,265 22,465 10,985 96 167,465 DODGE 11,135 929 308 0 7,694 DOUGLAS 23,172 1,468 1,595 3 16,655 FARIBAULT 9,773 521 497 0 7,291 FILLMORE 13,401 801 471 1 9,426 FREEBORN 19,378 1,605 1,207 0 15,252 GOODHUE 28,532 2,477 1,129 20 20,326 GRANT 4,286 280 317 0 3,183 HENNEPIN 703,471 71,483 37,830 454 494,329 HOUSTON 12,313 803 502 1 9,154 HUBBARD 12,700 1,115 1,055 0 9,954 ISANTI 20,896 1,996 790 0 14,746 ITASCA
    [Show full text]
  • About the Survey
    Gubernatorial Toss Up in Bread and Butter Campaign Lawrence R. Jacobs Director, Center for the Study of Politics and Governance Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs University of Minnesota Joanne M. Miller Research Associate, 2006 Elections Project Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science University of Minnesota September 20, 2006 Governor Tim Pawlenty and Attorney General Mike Hatch are tied in what is shaping up as a classic bread and butter campaign, according to a survey of 1,023 Minnesota voters in the week following the primary. Why the Governor is not in the lead is the big question. He enjoys a number of advantages including high approval ratings and voter satisfaction with the state’s direction and the respect of voters for his handling of the economy. What was expected to be his big liability – the unpopularity of President George Bush – is surprisingly not a factor. Instead, the Governor finds himself locked in a draw because voters are preoccupied with education and health care and Hatch enjoys a commanding advantage on these issues. The survey was conducted between September 13 and 18, 2006. (Primary elections were held on September 12th.) Toss Up: Forty-four percent of likely voters indicated they would vote for Hatch, 42 supported Pawlenty, 9 percent favored Independence Party candidate Peter Hutchinson and 5 percent did not respond. The difference between Hatch and Pawlenty is within the 3.9 percent margin of error and should be considered a toss up. Horse Race Among Likely Voters Don't Know/ Pawlenty Hatch Hutchinson Other/ Refused Total 42% 44% 9% 5% Republican 90% 4% 4% 3% Independent 38% 35% 21% 6% Democrat 6% 85% 5% 5% Hutchinson may end up being the spoiler but so far he is not hurting either candidate.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Elections
    Minnesota Elections Chapter Ten Minnesota Elections Minnesota Election Results History Voter Turnout Since 1950 .........................................................................494 Gubernatorial Election Results Since 1857 ...............................................496 Presidential Election Results Since 1860 ..................................................500 Minnesota Election Results 2018 August 14, 2018 State Primary ..................................................................507 November 6, 2018 State General Election ..........................................................520 Results by Legislative District ...................................................................535 A Minnesota Memorial On August 26, 2000, the state of Minnesota dedicated a monument on the grounds of the state capitol in St. Paul, commemorating the struggle of women for voting rights through the MWSA. The Minnesota Woman Suffrage Memorial recognizes the work of 25 women central to the suffrage movement with a series of plaques describing historical events and personalities alongside a trellis engraved with the names of those recognized, and a garden called Garden of Time: Landscape of Change. Minnesota Elections 494 Minnesota Voter Turnout Since 1950 100 General Elections 80 60 Primary Elections 40 Statewide Voter Turnout Percentage Turnout Statewide Voter 20 0 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2018 Minnesota Elections MINNESOTA PRIMARY ELECTION STATISTICS 1950 – 2018 % OF ELECTION DAY YEAR ELIGIBLE VOTED ELIGIBLE REGISTRATIONS
    [Show full text]