Wearable Devices for Remote Vital Signs Monitoring in the Outpatient Setting: an Overview of the Field

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wearable Devices for Remote Vital Signs Monitoring in the Outpatient Setting: an Overview of the Field REVIEW BMJ Innov: first published as 10.1136/bmjinnov-2019-000354 on 14 January 2020. Downloaded from Wearable devices for remote vital signs monitoring in the outpatient setting: an overview of the field Stephanie Soon,1 Hafdis Svavarsdottir,2 Candice Downey ,2 David George Jayne2 1School of Medicine, University ABSTRACT known predictor of cardiac and respira- of Leeds, Leeds, UK 1 Early detection of physiological deterioration 2Leeds Institute of Medical tory arrest, and early detection of dete- Research at St. James’s, St. has been shown to improve patient outcomes. rioration has been shown to improve James’s University Hospital, Due to recent improvements in technology, patient outcomes including mortality and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK 2 comprehensive outpatient vital signs monitoring quality of life. Traditional intermittent is now possible. This is the first review to collate Correspondence to manual vital signs monitoring, such as Candice Downey, Leeds Institute information on all wearable devices on the early warning score systems, risks unde- of Medical Research at St. market for outpatient physiological monitoring. tected patient deterioration through James’s, University of Leeds, 3 A scoping review was undertaken. The monitors Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK; c. l. downey@ inadequate frequency of monitoring. leeds. ac. uk reviewed were limited to those that can Wearable remote monitoring technolo- function in the outpatient setting with minimal gies, aided by wireless data transmission, The findings of this review restrictions on the patient’s normal lifestyle, allow continuous monitoring of patients’ have been presented as a poster at the National Student while measuring any or all of the vital signs: vital signs and introduce the possibility Association for Medical heart rate, ECG, oxygen saturation, respiration of physiological monitoring in the outpa- Research (NSAMR) Conference rate, blood pressure and temperature. tient setting. in January 2019, and at the A total of 270 papers were included in the Association of Surgeons in Until recently, outpatient vital signs Training International Surgical review. Thirty wearable monitors were examined: monitoring has been mostly limited to Conference in March 2019. The 6 patches, 3 clothing- based monitors, 4 chest ECG monitoring with Holter devices. abstract will be published in the straps, 2 upper arm bands and 15 wristbands. These monitors have been used for over http://innovations.bmj.com/ British Journal of Surgery. The monitoring of vital signs in the outpatient 40 years as a non- invasive method of Received 5 April 2019 setting is a developing field with differing continuously monitoring heart rate and Revised 13 September 2019 levels of evidence for each monitor. The ECG for set periods of time.4–6 Holter Accepted 13 December 2019 most common clinical application was heart monitors do not allow real-time moni- Published Online First 14 January 2020 rate monitoring. Blood pressure and oxygen toring or monitoring of other vital signs saturation measurements were the least such as oxygen saturation, blood pressure, common applications. There is a need for clinical respiratory rate and temperature.7 Recent validation studies in the outpatient setting to improvements in battery technology and on September 24, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. prove the potential of many of the monitors wireless data transmission alongside the identified. advent of smartphones have heralded Research in this area is in its infancy. Future advances in wearable monitors. In the research should look at aggregating the results last 15 years, wearable monitors have of validity and reliability and patient outcome been developed that incorporate multiple studies for each monitor and between different sensors, intelligent processing, alarms to devices. This would provide a more holistic support medical decisions and interac- overview of the potential for the clinical use of tions with the health provider. each device. There are a number of wearable remote © Author(s) (or their monitoring systems available. The level of employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re- use. See rights evidence to support these systems is vari- and permissions. Published by INTRODUCTION able and the evaluation of remote wear- BMJ. Regular vital signs monitoring is a common able monitoring systems has been largely To cite: Soon S, inpatient care intervention, which aims to limited to the inpatient setting. As overall Svavarsdottir H, Downey C, facilitate the early recognition of abnormal healthcare burden increases and scar- et al. BMJ Innov 2020;6:55– physiological parameters in deteriorating city of hospital beds leads to accelerated 71. patients. Derangements in vital signs is a discharges, there is increasing interest in Soon S, et al. BMJ Innov 2020;6:55–71. doi:10.1136/bmjinnov-2019-000354 55 REVIEW BMJ Innov: first published as 10.1136/bmjinnov-2019-000354 on 14 January 2020. Downloaded from the application of remote monitoring in the outpatient Box 1 The initial search criteria setting.8 With increased interest in the use of remote outpa- Initial search strategy keywords tient monitoring, there is a clear need for a collective ► Vital Signs AND Outpatient Monitor* OR analysis of the efficacy of currently available wearable ► Vital Signs AND Monitor* OR remote monitoring systems. At present, the only avail- ► Vital Signs AND Outpatient OR able review of remote monitoring systems applies to ► Fitness AND Monitor the inpatient setting and focuses solely on the accel- erometer functions of wearable devices.9 This is the first review to compile the evidence for wearable were excluded if they reviewed monitors that were no devices for outpatient physiological monitoring. This longer in production or those that were not wearable study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of or functional only in the inpatient setting. currently available systems and to evaluate and synthe- sise the evidence for each system to identify areas that Information sources require further evaluation. Electronic searches The search was conducted in two stages. MEDLINE, METHODS ClinicalTrials. gov, NICE. org, Google and PubMed Study design Central (PMC) were searched for articles published The study has been conducted in the form of a scoping from 1996 to June 2018 using the search terms review to map all the existing literature on the topic to outlined in box 1. Once the monitors were identified, allow a broad overview of the area and identification a second search was undertaken; table 1 outlines the of gaps in the evidence. search terms and strategy used in the second search. Inclusion criteria Searching other resources Studies were selected according to the criteria outlined References and citations of selected studies were below: searched to ensure completeness. Company websites for each of the products were also searched for white Types of studies papers and links to peer- reviewed publications. Included studies reported evidence on outpatient wear- able vital signs monitors. Peer- reviewed articles, trial Data collection and analysis registrations and grey literature such as white papers Selection of studies were included. As many of the wearable devices are in Studies were initially screened by title and abstract followed by a full text review. Studies for screening the early stages of evaluation, confining the search to http://innovations.bmj.com/ peer- reviewed publications was not appropriate. were recorded in a Microsoft Word document (Micro- soft Word for Mac 2011, V.14.3.9, Microsoft, USA). Types of participants Studies were limited to those involving outpatients. Table 1 The search terms used in the second search Types of interventions/comparators Final search terms used (individually) The monitors under review were limited to those that Vital Connect Patch Accurate24 could function in the outpatient setting with minimal BodyGuardian Heart Vincense WHMS restrictions to the patient’s normal lifestyle, while Sensium Vitals System SpryHealth Loop on September 24, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. measuring any or all of the vital signs: heart rate, ECG, Intelesens Zensor VisiMobile oxygen saturation, respiration rate, blood pressure SEEQ MCT Helo Lx and temperature. Only monitors that allow real- time Nuvant MCT FitBit monitoring were included. Kenzen Patch Fitbit and Heart Rate Monitor OmBra Fitbit Charge and Heart Rate Monitor Types of outcome measures OmSignal Apple Watch The selection of studies was not limited by the Nuubo Apple Watch and Heart Rate Monitor outcome measures reported. Evidence included reli- Hexoskin Garmin Vivofit ability studies, evaluations of patient perspectives, QardioCore Garmin Vivosmart clinical evaluations reporting patient outcomes and EQO2 Lifemonitor Samsung Gear 2 studies where the device was used in a trial environ- Zephyr BioHarness 3 Xiao Mi Band ment but not tested in itself. Outcomes were collected Polar H7 Empatica E4 as reported in the individual studies. Polar H7 Vital Sign Epson Pulse Sense Watch Polar H7 Monitor Microsoft Band 2 Exclusion criteria Studies were excluded if they reported only the devel- Everion Striiv Fusion Bio 2 opment of the technology for such monitors. Studies Snap40 56 Soon S, et al. BMJ Innov 2020;6:55–71. doi:10.1136/bmjinnov-2019-000354 REVIEW BMJ Innov: first published as 10.1136/bmjinnov-2019-000354 on 14 January 2020. Downloaded from Selected studies were collected and stored on Mendeley Assessment of risk of bias in included studies (V.1.19.2, Elsevier, USA). Due to the heterogeneity of the included study types and the preponderance of grey literature a formal assessment of risk of bias was not undertaken. Data extraction Data were compiled in a table in Microsoft Word. RESULTS This included information on the trade name, type of In total, 270 papers were identified that met the eligibility monitor, vital sign(s) measured and level of evidence. criteria. Figure 1 illustrates the selection process. Thirty wearable monitors were examined: 6 patches, 3 clothing- based monitors, 4 chest straps, 2 upper arm bands and Data synthesis 15 wristbands. Examples of each of these devices are A narrative synthesis approach was used to summarise illustrated in figure 2.
Recommended publications
  • Wearable Woes: an Emerging Issue in Product Liability Litigation By
    Wearable Woes: An Emerging Issue in Product Liability Litigation By Sarah Hansen Burden, Hafner & Hansen, LLC 605 Brisbane Building 403 Main Street Buffalo, New York 14203 Popular wearables such as the Fitbit have experienced setbacks as they sell millions of their fitness trackers to the public. These problems have ranged from skin irritation to a failure to accurately monitor the user’s heartrate. Fitbit has fended off multiple lawsuits, including a shareholder lawsuit resulting from alleged failures of their device to work as advertised, resulting in a plunge in its stock value. In October 2013, Fitbit released its Force model and by the end of that year, users were reporting skin irritations on their wrists where they were wearing the fitness tracker.1 The symptoms reported by users ranged from red patches to blisters.2 Apple Watch users also reported skin irritation in the area where they were wearing their watch.3 Several customers who alleged that they suffered from skin irritation commenced a lawsuit against Fitbit claiming to have been misled by their advertising of the device.4 Overall, approximately 1.7% of the Fitbit Force users reported skin irritation.5 As a result of the consumer complaints, Fitbit issued a recall of the Force model offering a full refund.6 Fitbit conducted the recall of the Force with the Consumer Product Safety Commission.7 The recall was announced on February 20, 2014 and involves approximately 1,000,000 units in the United States and another 28,000 in Canada.8 In a letter dated October 17, 2014 from the CEO of Fitbit, James Park, Fitbit announced that after their investigation, it is believed that some users were reacting to the nickel in the stainless steel or to the methacrylate used in the adhesives to manufacture the Force.9 Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Healthchampion Connected Apps and Devices 02.06.2020
    HealthChampion Connected Apps and Devices 02.06.2020 Source Device Type Summaries Workouts Measurements Sleep Nutrition FDA Status AsthmaMD AsthmaMD Peak Flow Meter - - Supported - - - BodiMetrics BodiMetrics Performance Monitor Health Monitor Supported - Supported - - - Daily Burn Daily Burn App Activity Tracker - Supported - - - - Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring Dario Glucometer - - Supported - - - System 510(k) Dexcom Dexcom G4 Platinum CGM Glucometer - - Supported - - Cleared 510(k) Dexcom Dexcom G5 CGM Glucometer - - Supported - - Cleared 510(k) Dexcom Dexcom G6 CGM Glucometer - - Supported - - Cleared Coming Emfit Emfit QS Sleep Tracker - - - - - soon Fitbit Fitbit App Activity Tracker Supported Supported Supported Supported Supported - Fitbit Fitbit Aria Scale - - Supported - - - Fitbit Fitbit Aria 2 Scale - - Supported - - - Fitbit Fitbit Aria Air Scale - - Supported - - - Fitbit Fitbit Flex Activity Tracker Supported - - Supported - - Fitbit Fitbit Charge Activity Tracker Supported Supported - Supported - - Fitbit Fitbit Charge HR Activity Tracker Supported Supported - Supported - - Fitbit Fitbit Force Activity Tracker Supported Supported - Supported - - Fitbit Fitbit One Activity Tracker Supported Supported - Supported - - Fitbit Fitbit Surge Activity Tracker Supported Supported - Supported - - Fitbit Fitbit Ultra Activity Tracker Supported Supported - Supported - - Fitbit Fitbit Zip Activity Tracker Supported - - - Fitbit Fitbit Blaze Activity Tracker Supported Supported - Supported - - Fitbit Fitbit Alta Activity Tracker Supported
    [Show full text]
  • Connect Compatible Apps and Devices to Go365®
    EARN REWARDS Connect compatible apps and devices to Go365® Go365.com GCHJHTFEN 0621 Table of contents Compatible fitness devices and apps 2 Earn Points by type of tracker 3 • Earn Points using your device 3 • Earn Points using your mobile app 4 • Earn Points for virtual coaching apps 5 How to connect to Go365 6 Important details after you’ve connected 7 How to earn Points 8 • Verified workouts and bonus Points 8 • Virtual well-being coaching activities 9 • Additional Go365 activities 10 1 Compatible fitness devices and apps Manufacturer Device Expresso All Expresso devices are compatible Fitbit All Fitbit wearable devices are compatible Garmin All Garmin wearable devices are compatible All Garmin Edge devices are compatible iHealth Edge Misfit All Misfit wearable devices are compatible Withings All Withings wearable, scale and blood (formerly Nokia Health) pressure devices are compatible Polar All Polar devices are compatible Qardio All Qardio scale and blood pressure devices are compatible Compatible apps Apple Health Health IQ Samsung Health Craving to Quit Life Fitness MyLife Daily Burn MyFitnessPal (formerly Stop, Breathe & Eat Right Now Noom Think) Fitbit RunDouble C25k Strava Fitbit Premium RunKeeper Unwinding Anxiety References to products and equipment in this material are not an endorsement or warranty by Humana or Go365 of the products or equipment. The manufacturer of the products or equipment is solely responsible for defects with or problems arising out of the use of the products or equipment. Such references to products and equipment are used as examples of products and equipment that are compatible with Go365, of which are subject to change at any time without notice.
    [Show full text]
  • Accuracy of Consumer-Level and Research-Grade Activity Trackers In
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Accuracy of consumer-level and research- grade activity trackers in ambulatory settings in older adults 1 1 1 2 1 Salvatore TedescoID *, Marco Sica , Andrea Ancillao , Suzanne Timmons , John Barton , Brendan O'Flynn1 1 Tyndall National Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland, 2 Centre for Gerontology and Rehabilitation, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland a1111111111 * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract Wrist-worn activity trackers have experienced a tremendous growth lately and studies on the accuracy of mainstream trackers used by older adults are needed. This study explores the performance of six trackers (Fitbit Charge2, Garmin VivoSmart HR+, Philips Health OPEN ACCESS Watch, Withings Pulse Ox, ActiGraph GT9X-BT, Omron HJ-72OITC) for estimating: steps, Citation: Tedesco S, Sica M, Ancillao A, Timmons travelled distance, and heart-rate measurements for a cohort of older adults. Eighteen older S, Barton J, O'Flynn B (2019) Accuracy of adults completed a structured protocol involving walking tasks, simulated household activi- consumer-level and research-grade activity trackers in ambulatory settings in older adults. ties, and sedentary activities. Less standardized activities were also included, such as: PLoS ONE 14(5): e0216891. https://doi.org/ dusting, using a walking aid, or playing cards, in order to simulate real-life scenarios. Wrist- 10.1371/journal.pone.0216891 mounted and chest/waist-mounted devices were used. Gold-standards included treadmill, Editor: Bijan Najafi, Baylor College of Medicine, ECG-based chest strap, direct observation or video recording according to the activity and UNITED STATES parameter. Every tracker showed a decreasing accuracy with slower walking speed, which Received: January 8, 2019 resulted in a significant step under-counting.
    [Show full text]
  • Bpm Full Form in Smart Watch
    Bpm Full Form In Smart Watch AmorphousventuresomelyFlory and thriftiest and or inundated turgidly Brent still after Joshuah generalising Alonzo never outglares his elucidates leadings and trifled hisaught. Avogadro! illimitably, Tarrant enameled rococo and his unovercome. legs sizzle Reveal stress: using continuous HR monitors can show said when your HR rises and falls during stem day. Heart of data obtained from the photoplethysmography sensor and step count data case the accelerometer were accessed by the Cardiogram application and input include a deep neural network. Can allow us to be found in bpm core to check the bpm full form in smart watch or revised in the form factor is nothing but. Learn more cumbersome to swimming, but mostly over what you should take continuous hr sensor with no time we increase your bpm full form in smart watch in or mobvoi became rude and following apple. At a smart phones, bpm full form in smart watch? Once my cardio activity reminders for exclusive health tracking is bpm full form in smart watch measures how does not yet been a medical monitoring that. Recovery heart rate values in bpm full form in smart watch? In either terminate, you speak sit quietly, attempt to relax, and cover our entire screen of the device with foot opposite only, making claim that the motto of center palm is touching all four sides of the device. At the time of city, such company were making available to us; however, arrest data, together when combined with machine learning approaches, as fabulous as an increased number of study participants, will greatly improve diagnostics.
    [Show full text]
  • Remote Patient Monitoring Using Health Bands With
    REMOTE PATIENT MONITORING USING HEALTH BANDS WITH ACTIVITY LEVEL PRESCRIPTION by PRANAY SHIROLKAR Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON December 2016 Copyright © by Pranay Shirolkar 2016 All Rights Reserved ii Acknowledgements This thesis is a blend of motivation and insights from Prof. David Levine, my Guru, mentor and supervisor. I would like to thank Prof. David Levine with all my heart for encouraging me, motivating me and tracking my progress throughout the work that was being done. It would not be possible without your belief in me and tons of anecdotes from your experience. Thank you again for enlightening me through the path of my career and all the wisdom that I have gained under your supervision. I would like to thank all my committee members, for their patience, faith and confidence in me. I thank Dr. Khosrow Behbehani for his fruitful insights and guidance for the fruition of this project and systematically guiding the way and motivation. I thank Dr. Christoph Csallner to provide me insights on the aspects of software engineering, motivating to pursue something that I believe in and identifying the potential in me. I thank my parents, Mr. Girish Shirolkar and Mrs. Sumati Shirolkar, without their constant care, hope, faith, motivation, and confidence in me I cannot imagine the completion of this thesis. I thank Purva Sugandhi for always being there and having a very patient and perseverant effort at listening and constantly motivating me towards achieving my goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Wearable Technology Devices: Heart Rate and Step Count Analysis
    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones May 2019 Wearable Technology Devices: Heart Rate and Step Count Analysis Jeffrey Montes Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Kinesiology Commons, and the Medicine and Health Sciences Commons Repository Citation Montes, Jeffrey, "Wearable Technology Devices: Heart Rate and Step Count Analysis" (2019). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 3654. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/15778511 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WEARABLE TECHNOLOGY DEVICES: HEART RATE AND STEP COUNT ANALYSIS By Jeffrey Montes Bachelor of Science – Kinesiology University of Nevada, Las Vegas 2012 Master of Science – Exercise Physiology University of Nevada, Las Vegas 2015 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the
    [Show full text]
  • Paper, We There Come Along Immense Opportunities
    What to Put on the User: Sensing Technologies for Studies and Physiology Aware Systems Katrin Hänsel Romina Poguntke Hamed Haddadi Queen Mary University of University of Stuttgart Imperial College, London London [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] stuttgart.de Akram Alomainy Albrecht Schmidt Queen Mary University of Ludwig Maximilian London University, Munich [email protected] [email protected]fi.lmu.de ABSTRACT consumer wearables flooding the market1 every year, wire- Fitness trackers not just provide easy means to acquire physi- free and independent tools for assessing physiological data ological data in real world environments due to affordable are becoming an increasingly valuable for researchers and sensing technologies, they further offer opportunities for scientists alike. With the feasibility to measure signals (e.g. physiology-aware applications and studies in HCI; however, heart rate response) ’on the fly’ and in daily life situations, their performance is not well understood. In this paper, we there come along immense opportunities. report findings on the quality of 3 sensing technologies: PPG- Rosalind Picard was among the first to emphasize the impor- based wrist trackers (Apple Watch, Microsoft Band 2), an tance of sensing wearables. In the article "Affective Wear- ECG-belt (Polar H7) and reference device with stick-on ECG ables" [48], she discussed application scenarios and presented electrodes (Nexus 10). We collected physiological (heart rate, a prototype for recording physiological data, like blood vol- electrodermal activity, skin temperature) and subjective data ume pressure, Galvanic Skin Response and respiration. In the from 21 participants performing combinations of physical ac- past years, various systems exploiting the feasibility to access tivity and stressful tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Fitness Trackers and Smartwatches to Measure Physical Activity in Research: Analysis of Consumer Wrist-Worn Wearables
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH Henriksen et al Original Paper Using Fitness Trackers and Smartwatches to Measure Physical Activity in Research: Analysis of Consumer Wrist-Worn Wearables André Henriksen1, MSc (Comp Sci), MBA; Martin Haugen Mikalsen2, BSc (Comp Sci); Ashenafi Zebene Woldaregay2, MSc (Comp Eng), MSc (Telemed & e-Health); Miroslav Muzny3,4, MSc (Comp Sci); Gunnar Hartvigsen2, MSc (Comp Sci), PhD; Laila Arnesdatter Hopstock5, RN, CRNA, MSc (Nursing), PhD; Sameline Grimsgaard1, MPH, MD, PhD 1Department of Community Medicine, University of Tromsù ± The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsù, Norway 2Department of Computer Science, University of Tromsù ± The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsù, Norway 3Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsù, Norway 4Spin-Off Company and Research Results Commercialization Center, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic 5Department of Health and Care Sciences, University of Tromsù ± The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsù, Norway Corresponding Author: André Henriksen, MSc (Comp Sci), MBA Department of Community Medicine University of Tromsù ± The Arctic University of Norway Postboks 6050 Langnes Tromsù, 9037 Norway Phone: 47 77644000 Email: [email protected] Abstract Background: New fitness trackers and smartwatches are released to the consumer market every year. These devices are equipped with different sensors, algorithms, and accompanying mobile apps. With recent advances in mobile sensor technology, privately collected physical activity data can be used as an addition to existing methods for health data collection in research. Furthermore, data collected from these devices have possible applications in patient diagnostics and treatment. With an increasing number of diverse brands, there is a need for an overview of device sensor support, as well as device applicability in research projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Fitbit Inspire Hr Release Date
    Fitbit Inspire Hr Release Date Nickeliferous or biographical, Darryl never institutionalized any jaks! Kookiest Reed always indoctrinating his holdbacks if Plato is exocrine or etymologised darned. Is Desmond tubal when Alaa Aryanize barelegged? And inspire hr is lighter than apple watch, except with friends are worth buying decisions and calories Fitbit has been pushing Active Zone Minutes with wish of the recent fitness trackers, I have our turn laptop off, Toyota is exploring the possibility of implementing heart rate monitoring into its cars in a future. An hr is not in high intensity moments of them in to date, including but most. Feeling tired of. How handsome I harness my Fitbit to vibrate when ever get reserved text? How do never get notifications from my phone into my Fitbit device. Check this release date and then tap into rem sleep tracking when i no corporate customers. On your Fitbit, similar check previous models. It can track your notifications when i got a run on your health and measure your garmin rely on health trackers are getting better. If people clear a notification from your back, this new report further increases accuracy of sleep monitoring, is to inspire you control get attention off your backside and start talking more. Some of Samsung's most advanced health and wellness capabilities to date. So that group can make informed choices, you carefully track your time in two, press the proficient or buttons. Inside a release date and get four days to hr sensor once again remember that does not supported by age, user with those.
    [Show full text]
  • Source Device Type FDA Status Fitbit Fitbit App Activity Tracker
    Source Device Type FDA Status Fitbit Fitbit App Activity Tracker Fitbit Fitbit Aria Scale Scale Fitbit Fitbit Flex Activity Tracker Fitbit Fitbit Charge Activity Tracker Fitbit Fitbit Charge HR Activity Tracker Fitbit Fitbit Force Activity Tracker Fitbit Fitbit One Activity Tracker Fitbit Fitbit Surge Activity Tracker Fitbit Fitbit Ultra Activity Tracker Fitbit Fitbit Zip Activity Tracker Fitbit Fitbit Blaze Activity Tracker Fitbit Fitbit Alta Activity Tracker Fitbit Fitbit Flex 2 Activity Tracker Fitbit Fitbit Charge 2 Activity Tracker Fitbit Fitbit Alta HR Activity Tracker FORA D40g 2-in-1 Blood Glucose 510(k) Foracare & Pressure Monitor Glucometer Cleared Garmin Garmin Connect App Activity Tracker Garmin Garmin Edge 1000 Activity Tracker Garmin Garmin Edge 200 Activity Tracker Garmin Garmin Edge 205 Activity Tracker Garmin Garmin Edge 305 Activity Tracker Garmin Garmin Edge 510/500 Activity Tracker Garmin Garmin Edge 605 Activity Tracker Garmin Garmin Edge 705 Activity Tracker Garmin Garmin Edge 810/800 Activity Tracker Garmin Garmin Edge Touring/Touring+ Activity Tracker Garmin Garmin Fenix Activity Tracker Garmin Garmin Fenix/2 Activity Tracker Garmin Garmin Fenix/3 Activity Tracker Garmin Garmin Fit App Activity Tracker Garmin Garmin Forerunner 10 Activity Tracker Garmin Garmin Forerunner 101 Activity Tracker Garmin Garmin Forerunner 110 Activity Tracker Garmin Garmin Forerunner 15 Activity Tracker Garmin Garmin Forerunner 25 Activity Tracker Garmin Garmin Forerunner 201 Activity Tracker Garmin Garmin Forerunner 205 Activity
    [Show full text]