DOCSLIB.ORG

Following the Fire Garden Calendar

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Following the Fire Garden Calendar VOLUME 26, NUMBER 1 SPRING 2018 Also inside Replanting Guidelines Following the Fire Garden Calendar PHOTO: B. COLLINS SPRING 2018 Ironwood 1 DIRECTOR’S 1212 Mission Canyon Road MESSAGE Santa Barbara, CA 93105 Tel (805) 682-4726 sbbg.org Following Fire GARDEN HOURS n December 2017, the Thomas Fire Mar – Oct: Daily 9AM – 6PM Nov – Feb: Daily 9AM – 5PM caused us to close for two weeks. However, thanks to the heroic efforts REGISTRATION Ext. 102 I Registrar is available: M – F / 9AM – 4PM of firefighters, the fire was stopped more than a mile away from us, and the Garden GARDEN SHOP Ext. 112 Hours: Mar – Oct, Daily 9AM – 5:30PM suffered no damage. After having more Nov – Feb, Daily 9AM – 4:30PM than 70% of the Garden burn and losing GARDEN NURSERY Ext. 127 several structures in the 2009 Jesusita Fire, Selling California native plants to the we feel fortunate to have escaped —this public with no admission fee. time. Our only losses were financial. Hours: Mar – Oct, Daily 9AM – 5:30PM Unfortunately, many of our members Nov – Feb, Daily 9AM – 4:30PM and supporters were not so lucky. We DEVELOPMENT Ext. 133 extend our deepest sympathy to all those EDUCATION Ext. 160 FACILITY RENTAL Ext. 103 who lost loved ones, homes, and businesses MEMBERSHIP Ext. 110 due to the fire and floods. We know what they are going through VOLUNTEER OFFICE Ext. 119 and we understand the effort it will take to recover. It will not be easy but with community support, recovery will happen. Our open IRONWOOD | Volume 26, Number 1 | Spring 2018 spaces and wild lands will recover too, and with some rain, the ISSN 1068-4026 “fire followers” will bloom this spring and the coming years. EDITOR Flannery Hill DESIGNER Paula Schaefer Fire management and restoration are complex issues. In this edition of the Ironwood, we explore the role of fire in our environ- Ironwood is published quarterly by the Santa ment. What can we expect in the future, given climate change, Barbara Botanic Garden, a private nonprofit institution founded in 1926. prolonged extreme drought, and unprecedented fire and weather The Garden fosters the conservation of events? How can individuals, communities, businesses, and govern- California native plants through our gardens, ments best aid the natural fire recovery process? It is not as easy as education, and research, and serves as a role model of sustainable practices. Smokey the Bear led The Garden is a member of the American us to believe. We extend our deepest sympathy to all Public Gardens Association, the American There is much Alliance of Museums, the California Association of Museums, and the American Horticultural more to learn and those who lost loved ones, homes, and Society. ©2018 Santa Barbara Botanic Garden. understand about businesses due to the fire and floods. All rights reserved. how native systems recover from infre- BOARD OF TRUSTEES quent fire, as well what could happen if fires are more frequent CHAIR Peter Schuyler in the future. What might the central coast look like in 50 or 100 VICE-CHAIR Tom Craveiro SECRETARY John Parke years with more extreme weather events, leading to more frequent TREASURER Edward Roach fires and droughts? We don’t know yet, but we will be here to Samantha Davis help our native species and habitats make it through this time Lou Greer Frost Gil Garcia of change. The Garden conducts research and works to facilitate Elaine Gibson informed decisions on these big questions. Thank you for being a Sarah Berkus Gower part of this effort. Valerie Hoffman William Murdoch Gerry Rubin Sincerely, Kathy Scroggs Jesse Smith Susan Spector Susan Van Atta FOLLOW THE GARDEN! Steve Windhager, Ph.D. FACEBOOK.COM/SBGARDEN Executive Director YOUTUBE.COM/SBBGORG @SANTABARBARABOTANICGARDEN 1 Ironwood SPRING 2018 B. COLLINS Jute netting used for erosion control at the Garden WEED DON'T SEED PROPOSED GUIDELINES FOR REPLANTING AFTER THE THOMAS FIRE BY BRUCE REED, HORTICULTURIST The California Flora is good at responding after intense different environmental conditions than those in the wild 1 burning. The best choice for homeowners and land manag- and it is impossible to predict which genetic characteristics ers alike is to allow the natural germination of seeds and will be favored by these conditions. Whereas in developed resprouting of surviving perennial species. Perennial survi- areas adding commercially produced native seed is fine, vors, like oaks, California lilacs, chamise, and many others and even good for wildlife, doing the same in wildlands are very robust–often beginning to sprout before rainfall. may cause more harm than good. The seedbank—long-fallen seeds from past years buried in the top inch or two of soil—is a part of these plants’ coevo- Allow the natural vegetation to flourish and expand. It lution with fire, and will germinate, even with very modest 3 will do this best without interference. The best influence amounts of rain. Allow these natural dynamics to unfold. we can have is to watch for and remove young, resprout- Achieving 60% soil coverage in the first rain season after ing invasive plants. (See Cal-IPC’s site on plants invasive in a fire is common. And 90% or better in the second year is California, www.cal-ipc.org/plants/profiles). This may be also common. No added seeding is necessary in previously the most important action we can take in the first growing undisturbed or semi-wild areas. season after a fire. Adding seed is problematic for the native vegetation on Most rains we experience locally are small in quantity 2 two fronts. It risks the possibility of introducing plants 4 and quick. This pattern is perfect for natural revegetation that may become invasive (like the introduction of black of our foothills. However, long-lasting and heavy rainfall mustard decades ago to “control” erosion after fires) even if totals can happen. While a growing, resprouting hillside they are native elsewhere in the region and also may intro- is better than most man-made strategies for controlling duce species not present in your locale before, requiring erosion, this growth can take time. There are a number of surviving plants to compete. temporary erosion control methods that can be effective in On very disturbed sites where it is demonstrated that immediately stabilizing soils without reducing the regenera- the native seedbank is not adequate, the best choice is tion of native plants: to reseed with seeds collected locally. Many restoration- a. straw rolls, or wattles ists would consider “local” on the south coast to be seeds b. jute netting collected from Rincon to Point Conception, for instance c. air-dropped soil tackifiers, like paper mulch, intended and representing species already present on the site. It is to last through the first couple of rain events, do not inhibit seedling germination. However there are few often underappreciated how fragmented populations of studies demonstrating how effective they may be in our native plants are becoming because of development stabilizing bare soils. Note that no fertilizer or seeds and other land-use practices. It is common to have small should be included in such applications. populations of some species that are more vulnerable to a “swamping” effect when commercially grown seeds are Straw mats or plastic sheeting will impede seedling germination to planted nearby. Commercially produced seed is subject to different degrees and are not recommended. SPRING 2018 Ironwood 2 FOLLOWING THE FIRE by Sonia Fernandez THE RECENT THOMAS FIRE reminds those of us who live on Santa Barbara’s South Coast of the sobering reality that we live in a place where wildfires are a part of life. What started as a small brush fire some 40 miles away was joined by a second blaze ignited by a power line, and together they burned through both urban and wildland terrain for weeks. The fire ate up about 282,000 acres, and became the largest wildfire in California’s history. ll of us in Santa Barbara County JUST ADD WATER watched the blaze march west across However, before the trees and shrubs come back the foothills, aided by warm and dry to restore the hillsides, we can look forward to F. LAMBRECHT F. northerly offshore winds and fed by a bloom, as herbaceous flowering plants take Afuels that hadn’t burned in decades. In the end, advantage of the clearing and the release of nutri- C. 2000 BEFORE JESUSITA FIRE what remained was a charred landscape of ash ents into the soil to spring from seeds that have and blackened trees. lain dormant for years. But one community’s devastating disaster is “Botanists get pretty thrilled at the prospect another’s regenerating spark. The local coastal of a fire because there are certain wildflowers sage and chaparral are fire-adapted plant commu- that you see only after a fire,” Collins said. nities that have evolved to depend on fires to set It’s a well-orchestrated process that these the stage for their renewal. plants, called “fire followers,” have developed “Even though we view it as tragic, there's in response to their ecology, Collins explained. actually a great rejuvenating aspect to a fire,” Their seeds are tough enough to withstand said Betsy Collins, the Santa Barbara Botanic intense heat and they respond to temperature Garden’s Director of Horticulture. Because it's so and chemical cues brought on by fire, ash and dry in this region during the warm season there's smoke. Awakened by these cues, and moist- not a lot of decomposition the way there is in ened by the rains that come with California’s the wetter regions of the world, she said.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brief Communication: Meteorological and Climatological Conditions
    Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 3037–3043, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-3037-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Brief communication: Meteorological and climatological conditions associated with the 9 January 2018 post-fire debris flows in Montecito and Carpinteria, California, USA Nina S. Oakley1,2, Forest Cannon2, Robert Munroe3, Jeremy T. Lancaster4, David Gomberg3, and F. Martin Ralph2 1Western Regional Climate Center, Desert Research Institute, 2215 Raggio Parkway, Reno, Nevada 89512, USA 2Center for Western Weather and Water Extremes, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093, USA 3National Weather Service, Oxnard/Los Angeles, 520 N. Elevar St., Oxnard, CA 93030, USA 4California Geological Survey, 801 K St., Sacramento, CA 95814, USA Correspondence: Nina S. Oakley ([email protected]) Received: 20 June 2018 – Discussion started: 26 June 2018 Revised: 8 October 2018 – Accepted: 25 October 2018 – Published: 19 November 2018 Abstract. The Thomas Fire burned 114 078 ha in Santa rainfall intensity of 24 mm h−1 (USGS, 2018a; Fig. S1 in the Barbara and Ventura counties, southern California, during Supplement). December 2017–January 2018. On 9 January 2018, high- In the first significant rainfall event of the wet season on 9 intensity rainfall occurred over the Thomas Fire burn area January 2018, high-intensity rainfall occurred over the west- in the mountains above the communities of Montecito and ernmost portion of the Thomas Fire burn area between 11:30 Carpinteria, initiating multiple devastating debris flows. The and 12:00 UTC (03:30–04:00 LST).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C - Response to Science
    Ringo EIS Appendix C - Response to Science Appendix C – RESPONSE TO SCIENCE The following table summarizes the Forest Service consideration of publications that were provided during the comment period and which were directly referenced in the comments, or determined to either have some relevance to the analysis or indicate there is a difference of opinion within the body of the science. NEPA states that comments on the EIS shall be as specific as possible (40 CFR 1503.3 Specificity of Comments). Some of the following documents are considered non-substantive comments that do not warrant further response. In either case, the following table explains the consideration given by the Forest Service. Referenced Document Forest Service Consideration/Response Cited Science by Dick Artley Mr. Artleys Attachment #1- Scientists Reveal the Natural Resources in the Forest are Harmed (and some destroyed) by Timber Harvest Activities Al-jabber, Jabber M. “Habitat Fragmentation:: Effects and The picture in the Cascadia Wildlands Project publication shows clearcuts and talks Implications” about fragmentation and edge effects which results in crowding of the ark (Meffe et Clearcuts and forest fragmentation, Willamette NF, Oregon. al. 1997) where after logging, species all try to exist in the remaining patches of From: Cascadia Wildland Project, Spring 2003 unlogged forest. Clear cuts are not proposed for the Ringo project. There are http://faculty.ksu.edu.sa/a/Documents/Habitat%20Fragmentation%20Eff openings that will be created that are consistent with gaps and openings of at least 0.5 ects%20and%20Implication.pdf acres described in the Old Growth Definitions (USDA FS 1993, Region 6 interim Old Growth Definitions).
    [Show full text]
  • Original Draft CWPP
    DRAFT CITY OF SANTA BARBARA May 2020 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. Table of Contents SECTIONS Acronyms and Abbreviations ..........................................................................................................................................................v Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................................................... vii 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Development Team ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Community Involvement ................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.3.1 Stakeholders ................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3.2 Public Outreach and Engagement Plan ........................................................................................................ 4 1.3.3 Public Outreach Meetings .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity
    fire The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity s is evidenced year after year, the na- ture of the “fire problem” in south- Jon E. Keeley, Hugh Safford, C.J. Fotheringham, A ern California differs from most of Janet Franklin, and Max Moritz the rest of the United States, both by nature and degree. Nationally, the highest losses in ϳ The 2007 wildfire season in southern California burned over 1,000,000 ac ( 400,000 ha) and property and life caused by wildfire occur in included several megafires. We use the 2007 fires as a case study to draw three major lessons about southern California, but, at the same time, wildfires and wildfire complexity in southern California. First, the great majority of large fires in expansion of housing into these fire-prone southern California occur in the autumn under the influence of Santa Ana windstorms. These fires also wildlands continues at an enormous pace cost the most to contain and cause the most damage to life and property, and the October 2007 fires (Safford 2007). Although modest areas of were no exception because thousands of homes were lost and seven people were killed. Being pushed conifer forest in the southern California by wind gusts over 100 kph, young fuels presented little barrier to their spread as the 2007 fires mountains experience the same negative ef- reburned considerable portions of the area burned in the historic 2003 fire season. Adding to the size fects of long-term fire suppression that are of these fires was the historic 2006–2007 drought that contributed to high dead fuel loads and long evident in other western forests (e.g., high distance spotting.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of California Wildfire Evacuations from 2017 to 2019
    REVIEW OF CALIFORNIA WILDFIRE EVACUATIONS FROM 2017 TO 2019 STEPHEN WONG, JACQUELYN BROADER, AND SUSAN SHAHEEN, PH.D. MARCH 2020 DOI: 10.7922/G2WW7FVK DOI: 10.7922/G29G5K2R Wong, Broader, Shaheen 2 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. UC-ITS-2019-19-b N/A N/A 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Review of California Wildfire Evacuations from 2017 to 2019 March 2020 6. Performing Organization Code ITS-Berkeley 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report Stephen D. Wong (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3638-3651), No. Jacquelyn C. Broader (https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3269-955X), N/A Susan A. Shaheen, Ph.D. (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3350-856X) 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Institute of Transportation Studies, Berkeley N/A 109 McLaughlin Hall, MC1720 11. Contract or Grant No. Berkeley, CA 94720-1720 UC-ITS-2019-19 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period The University of California Institute of Transportation Studies Covered www.ucits.org Final Report 14. Sponsoring Agency Code UC ITS 15. Supplementary Notes DOI: 10.7922/G29G5K2R 16. Abstract Between 2017 and 2019, California experienced a series of devastating wildfires that together led over one million people to be ordered to evacuate. Due to the speed of many of these wildfires, residents across California found themselves in challenging evacuation situations, often at night and with little time to escape. These evacuations placed considerable stress on public resources and infrastructure for both transportation and sheltering.
    [Show full text]
  • Baer Survey Specialist Report Format
    Thomas Fire 2017-2018, Los Padres National Forest BAER Hydrology Report Resource Specialty: Hydrology Fire Name: Thomas Fires Month and Year: December 2017-January 2018 Author(s) Name and Home unit Name: Emily Fudge, Cleveland National Forest Objectives This assessment focused on evaluating possible post-fire hydrologic threats to potential values at risk for the Thomas Fire on the Los Padres National Forest, Santa Barbara County, California. Hydrologic post-fire threats include post-fire flooding, slope instability, and bulking of flows from sediment and debris. Potential threats also include avulsion on depositional fans and catchment outlets due to bulked flows (rapid relocation of channel location); braiding of channels, scour, and channel migration. I. Potential Values at Risk Initial potential Values at Risk (VARs) identified for evaluation for the Thomas Fire are listed below. See VAR spreadsheet in the 2500-8 for detailed list of evaluated values at risk (VARs). During preliminary reconnaissance, it was recognized that whole communities, major highways and roads, and privately owned infrastructure downstream/slope of the Thomas Fire could be affected by post-fire effects. A State Watershed Emergency Response Team (WERT) was tasked with conducting an assessment of VARs on non-FS lands including all these areas. This BAER assessment focuses on VARs owned by the Forest Service or located on FS lands. An initial BAER assessment considered VARs in the Ojai and Wheeler Ridge areas so these areas are excluded from this report. This assessment does not include assessment of post-fire impacts within the Adams Canyon, Harmon Canyon, Arundell Barranca, or Lower Ventura River HUC 6 watersheds.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Agenda Packet
    NOTICE AND AGENDA FOR REGULAR MEETING DATE/TIME: Wednesday, February 13, 2019, 1:30 PM PLACE: Board of Supervisors Chambers 651 Pine Street, Martinez, CA 94553 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Commission will hear and consider oral or written testimony presented by any affected agency or any interested person who wishes to appear. Proponents and opponents, or their representatives, are expected to attend the hearings. From time to time, the Chair may announce time limits and direct the focus of public comment for any given proposal. Any disclosable public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and distributed by LAFCO to a majority of the members of the Commission less than 72 hours prior to that meeting will be available for public inspection in the office at 651 Pine Street, Six Floor, Martinez, CA, during normal business hours as well as at the LAFCO meeting. All matters listed under CONSENT ITEMS are considered by the Commission to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless requested by a member of the Commission or a member of the public prior to the time the Commission votes on the motion to adopt. For agenda items not requiring a formal public hearing, the Chair will ask for public comments. For formal public hearings the Chair will announce the opening and closing of the public hearing. If you wish to speak, please complete a speaker’s card and approach the podium; speak clearly into the microphone, start by stating your name and address for the record.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Fire – After Action Review
    Thomas Fire 12/04/2017 – 12/22/2017 City of Ventura Emergency Operations Center After Action Review INTRODUCTION On December 4, 2017, the Thomas Fire started north of the City of Santa Paula. Driven by intense Santa Ana winds, the fire reached the City of Ventura within hours and damaged or destroyed 686 structures. At the time of final containment, the Thomas Fire would be classified as the largest fire in recorded California history. To assist with response efforts, the City proclaimed a local state of emergency and activated its Emergency Operations Center (EOC). Per the City’s Emergency Plan, the primary objective during the emergency was to provide for effective life safety measures, reduce property loss and protect the environment. As part of the EOC process, an After Action Review (AAR) began informally during activation and then formally commenced in June, 2018. During the Thomas Fire, over 140 persons served in the City of Ventura EOC. AARs focus on nationally established core capabilities (currently there are 32 core capabilities spanning 5 mission areas: Prevention, Protection, Mitigation, Response and Recovery). After a disaster, jurisdictions in California are required by statute (California Code of Regulations, section 2900[q]) to prepare an AAR to identify areas of improvement and corrective actions for each identified deficiency. As a compliance document focusing on improvement, the AAR does not focus on the successes but rather those areas that need to be improved upon. While interviewing staff from each EOC section, many successes were identified and discussed. The AAR captures some of these successes as strengths, but does not go into detail about the many successes that were experienced during this fire.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Supply Management Report 2018-2019 Water Year
    FINAL January 28, 2020 City of Santa Barbara Water Supply Management Report 2018-2019 Water Year Prepared by Water Resources Division, Public Works Department City of Santa Barbara Water Supply Management Report 2019 Water Year (October 1, 2018 – September 30, 2019) Water Resources Division, Public Works Department January 28, 2020 INTRODUCTION The City of Santa Barbara operates the water utility to provide water for its citizens, certain out-of-City areas, and visitors. Santa Barbara is an arid area, so providing an adequate water supply requires careful management of water resources. The City has a diverse water supply including local reservoirs (Lake Cachuma and Gibraltar Reservoir), groundwater, State Water, desalination, and recycled water. The City also considers water conservation an important tool for balancing water supply and demand. The City's current Long-Term Water Supply Plan (LTWSP) was adopted by City Council on June 14, 2011. This annual report summarizes the following information: The status of water supplies at the end of the water year (September 30, 2019) Drought outlook Water conservation and demand Major capital projects that affect the City’s ability to provide safe clean water Significant issues that affect the security and reliability of the City’s water supplies Appendix A provides supplemental detail. Additional information about the City's water supply can be found on-line at: www.SantaBarbaraCA.gov/Water. WATER SUPPLIES The City has developed five different water supplies: local surface water; local groundwater (which includes water that seeps into Mission Tunnel); State Water; desalinated seawater; and recycled water. Typically, most of the City’s demand is met by local surface water reservoirs and recycled water and augmented as necessary by local groundwater, State Water, and desalination.
    [Show full text]
  • Cal Fire: Creek Fire Now the Largest Single Wildfire in California History
    Cal Fire: Creek Fire now the largest single wildfire in California history By Joe Jacquez Visalia Times-Delta, Wednesday, September 23, 2020 The Creek Fire is now the largest single, non-complex wildfire in California history, according to an update from Cal Fire. The fire has burned 286,519 acres as of Monday night and is 32 percent contained, according to Cal Fire. The Creek Fire, which began Sept. 4, is located in Big Creek, Huntington Lake, Shaver Lake, Mammoth Pool and San Joaquin River Canyon. Creek Fire damage realized There were approximately 82 Madera County structures destroyed in the blaze. Six of those structures were homes, according to Commander Bill Ward. There are still more damage assessments to be made as evacuation orders are lifted and converted to warnings. Madera County sheriff's deputies notified the residents whose homes were lost in the fire. The Fresno County side of the fire sustained significantly more damage, according to Truax. "We are working with (Fresno County) to come up with away to get that information out," Incident Commander Nick Truax said. California wildfires:Firefighters battle more than 25 major blazes, Bobcat Fire grows Of the 4,900 structures under assessment, 30% have been validated using Fresno and Madera counties assessor records. Related: 'It's just too dangerous': Firefighters make slow progress assessing Creek Fire damage So far, damage inspection teams have counted more than 300 destroyed structures and 32 damaged structures. "These are the areas we can safely get to," Truax said. "There are a lot of areas that trees have fallen across the roads.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Hazards
    Burned Area Emergency Response (BAER) Assessment FINAL Specialist Report – GEOLOGIC HAZARDS Thomas Fire –Los Padres N.F. December, 2017 Jonathan Yonni Schwartz – Geomorphologist/geologist, Los Padres NF Introduction The Thomas Fire started on December 4, 2017, near the Thomas Aquinas College (east end of Sulphur Mountain), Ventura County, California. The fire is still burning and as of December 13, 2017, is estimated to have burned 237,500 acres and is 25% contained. Since the fire is still active, the BAER Team analysis is separated into two phases. This report/analysis covers a very small area of the fire above the community of Ojai, California and is considered phase 1 (of 2). Under phase 1 of this BAER assessment, 40,271 acres are being analyzed (within the fire parameter) out of which 22,971 acres are on National Forest Service Lands. The remaining 17,300 acres are divided between County, City and private lands. Out of a total of 40,271 acres that were analyzed, 99 acres were determined to have burned at a high soil burn severity, 19,243 acres at moderate soil burn severity, 12,044 acres at low soil burn severity and 8,885 acres were unburned. All of the above acres including the unburned acres are within the fire parameter. This report describes and assesses the increase in risk from geologic hazards within the Thomas Fire burned area. When evaluating Geologic Hazards, the focus of the “Geology” function on a BAER Team is on identifying the geologic conditions and geomorphic processes that have helped shape and alter the watersheds and landscapes, and assessing the impacts from the fire on those conditions and processes which will affect downstream values at risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Fuels, Fire Suppression, and the California Conundrum
    Fuels, fire suppression, and the California conundrum Eric Knapp U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station Redding, CA Bald and Eiler Fires - 2014; Photo: T. Erdody How did we get here? 2018: Most destructive wildfire (Camp Fire) Largest wildfire (Mendocino Complex) Most acres burned in modern CA history 2017: 2nd most destructive wildfire (Tubbs Fire) 2nd largest wildfire (Thomas Fire) Mediterranean climate = fire climate Redding, CA (Elev. 500 ft) 8 100 7 6 80 F) o 5 Wildfire season 4 60 3 Precipitation (in) 2 40 Ave Max.Temp. ( 1 0 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Precipitation Month Temperature • Very productive – grows fuel • Fuel critically dry every summer • Hot/dry = slow decomposition Fire activity through time Shasta-Trinity National Forest (W of Trinity Lake) 1750 1850 1897 Fire return interval 3 years 12 years No fire since 1897 Fuel limited fire regime | Ignition limited fire regime • Fire was historically a combination of indigenous burning and lightning ignitions • Aided travel, hunting, and improved the qualities of culturally important plants • Many early Euro-American settlers initially continued to burn • Forage for grazing animals • Lessened the danger from summer wildfires • Foresters advocated for Halls Flat, A. Wieslander, 1925 suppressing fire • “The virgin forest is certainly less than half stocked, chiefly as one result of centuries of repeated fires” – Show and Kotok 1925 • Believed keeping fire out would be cheaper than treating fuels with fire Burney area, A. Wieslander, 1925 Change in structural variability (trees > 4 in.) 1929 2008 Methods of Cutting Study – Stanislaus National Forest Lack of fire also changed non-forests A.
    [Show full text]