View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Anthropology Faculty Publications Anthropology, Department of 11-2010 Time Diary versus Instantaneous Sampling: A Comparison of Two Behavioral Research Methods Michael Paolisso University of Maryland - College Park,
[email protected] Raymond B. Hames University of Nebraska-Lincoln,
[email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/anthropologyfacpub Part of the Other Anthropology Commons, and the Social Statistics Commons Paolisso, Michael and Hames, Raymond B., "Time Diary versus Instantaneous Sampling: A Comparison of Two Behavioral Research Methods" (2010). Anthropology Faculty Publications. 87. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/anthropologyfacpub/87 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Anthropology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in Field Methods 22:4 (November 2010), pp. 357-377; doi: 10.1177/1525822X10379200 Copyright © 2010 Michael Paolisso and Raymond Hames. Published by SAGE Publications. Used by permission. Published online August 12, 2010. digitalcommons.unl.edudigitalcommons.unl.edu Time Diary versus Instantaneous Sampling: A Comparison of Two Behavioral Research Methods Michael Paolisso1 and Raymond Hames2 1 Department of Anthropology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 2 Department of Anthropology, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE Corresponding author — Michael Paolisso, Department of Anthropology, 1111 Woods Hall, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA; email
[email protected] Abstract The accurate collection of unbiased behavioral data is an important compo- nent of theory building and ethnographic research.