The Creation of Women from the Perspective of Mufassirun and Muhaddithun Between Past and Present Scholars

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Creation of Women from the Perspective of Mufassirun and Muhaddithun Between Past and Present Scholars MATEC Web of Conferences 150, 05064 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815005064 MUCET 2017 The Creation of Women from the Perspective of Mufassirun and Muhaddithun Between Past and Present Scholars Roshimah Shamsudin1,*, Aiza Maslan Baharudin 1Universiti Sains Malaysia Abstract. The creation of women is under constant debate, not only among the Islamic scholars but outspreads to feminists both from the west as well muslims.This debate stems from the differing views of the preceding and contemporary scholars in interpreting the texts from the Quran and the Hadiths on the creation of human particularly Eve as the first woman created by Allah. The majority of the mufassirun and hadith scholars in the past pioneered the view that the origin of human; that Eve was created from the rib of Adam a.s. This view was regarded by the feminists as derogatory to women. The contemporary mufassirun and muhaddithun are however of the opposite opinion whereby Eve’s creation was equal to that of Adam’s a.s; thereby indicating that creation of Eve did not originate from Adam a.s. Hence this study was undertaken with the aim of reviewing the opinions of the tafsir and hadith figures by comparing the views between the past and present scholars in interpretation of Quranic texts as well as hadiths pertaining to the origin and creation of women. This study also extends to examining the arguments on which the opinions of each group were deduced.In order to achieve the above objectives, this qualitative form of study will employ data collection method, conducted through library research to obtain data relating to the origin of creation of women, in particular turath literatures in tafsir for example Tafsir Ibn Kathir and tafsir works by the leading tafsir scholars in the like of Syed Qutb; in addition to the past and present books on syarah hadith. The findings of this study show that the previous and present scholars of tafsir or hadith took different methodology in understanding both textual authorities.Unlike the previous scholars of tafsir and hadith, some of the contemporary scholars’ understanding is that the texts are not to be construed literally; instead the texts need to be understood as parables and allegories thereby indicating that the creation of women is not from the ribs of Adam a.s. 1 Introduction Halimah Basri is attributable to the concept that women are not created equal to men, and to top it off was The issue of creation of women is not spared from created out of men as opined by certain mufassirun. In intense discussion, particularly in the context of this context, she did not only associate this creation women’s position to that of men.The issue stems from issues with the texts from hadiths alone but also links to the view that women creation was derived from the rib the Quranic texts that were interpreted by past scholars of Adam. Wan Siti Nur Haini argues that the above view which had long been inherited and permeated into the psyche of most Muslims implicates the status of women 2 Materials and Methods which generally are regarded as second class citizens. This qualitative study relies solely on library research. The idea was reinforced by the existence of texts that This means data was collected from primary scriptures – show women were created from the ribs as evidenced by from the books of tafsir and hadith. From the works of an authentic hadith narrated by Al-Bukhari and Muslim tafsir, data was taken from principal books of tafsir whose narrations form the two major hadith written by earlier scholars such as Tafsir Ibn Kathir, compilations that are consensually agreed upon by the Tafsir al-Tabari, Tafsir al-Maraghi, books written by hadith scholars as authentic, second only to the holy al- other contemporary tafsir scholars such as Muhammad Quran. Thus it is not unfathomable on why this women Abduh and Rashid Redha and reference books of creation idea has lasting influence in the Islamic Tafsir written by a number of scholars from the traditions. archipelago such as Hamka, M. Quraish Shihab and Unfortunately, the notion that women was created Ahjmad Sonhadji. Data are also taken from key books of from Adam’s rib compromised women of their rights hadith such as Sahih al-Bukhari, Sahih Muslim and from various aspects such as religion, politics and social Jami' al-Tirmidhi and commentaries of hadith such as [25]. The denial of the rights of women according to © The Authors, published by EDP Sciences. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). MATEC Web of Conferences 150, 05064 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815005064 MUCET 2017 Fath al-Bari, written by bn aar and Sharh Sahih Ibn athir aso concurs with a-Tabari and a-azi Muslim, authored by a-awawi. The data were then on the origin of Eve from Adam’s rib. As a eader anayed using the inductie deductie and comparatie eegesist who mastered the science of adiths, bn method. athir did not negect to produce arguments from the hadiths to support his interpretations as is the case with 3 Results a-Rai and asserts that since the hadith was narrated by uslim thereby it indicates its authenticity in addition to In the context of creation of women, Halimatussa’diyah having a sahih status and recorded in the grand hadiths opines that the sources are mosty from the Israilliyyat compiation books. n addition, bn athir does not Torah, ibbe and Tamud compared to the a-Quran eaborate on the creation of ve as does he on the itsef, whereby the atter does not een hae cear creation of man from cay without a mother and a father, absoute passages as eidence thereof. There are creation of esus from only his mother without a father neertheess three uranic verses that ed to the story of and creation of mankind other than Adam, ve and esus creation of women. or instance, erse 1 Al-Nisa’; verse through the process of pregnancy. This discussion 189 surah A-A’raf and verse 6: surah Al-Zumar. signifes that the creation of man can be understood from owever erse 1 of surah Al-Nisa’ is more often quoted arious dimensions based on its formative eements [10]. b mufassirun to prove the origin of women. The same can be said of uyuti who seems to have simiar iews to the schoars preceding him. oweer though the editor of his tafsir book by the name ah a- َ in opines that the hadith pertaining to the creation of يَا أيُّ َها ال َّنا ُس اتَّ ُقوا َربَّ ُك ُم ا َّل ِذي َخ َل َق ُكم ِ من َّن ْف ٍس َوا ِح َد ٍة Eve is indeed authentic however, the texts are in the َو َخ َل َق ِم ْن َها َز ْو َج َها َوبَ َّث ِم ْن ُه َما ِر َجا اًل َكثِي ارا َونِ َسا اء ۚ form of tamthil or parabes to showcase the stubbornness َواتَّقُوا َّ�َ ا َّل ِذي تَ َسا َءلُو َن بِ ِه َوا ْْلَ ْر َحا َم ۚ إِ َّن َّ�َ َكا َن of women compared to men [22]. bn Asyur too is found َع َل ْي ُك ْم َرقِيباا eaning mankind, reerence your guidence to hae supported the notion that nafs wahidah to be Lord who created you from a singe person, referring to Adam from whose rib ve was created as can be deduced from the word minha [8]. created of ie nature his mate and from them twain scattered countess men and women. owever a-araghi from amongst the ancient schoars have a dissenting iew from the consensus of There are three words that form the basis of the creation mufassirun. To him mufassirun jumhur’s interpretations of women namel wahidah, minha, and zaujaha a of are not based on the uranic passages but instead are which are gien different interpretation by the made on a natura basis that Adam is the father of mufassirun [6. The differences had sparked humankind as mentioned in Torah. e howeer does not disagreements among schoars of eegesis themselves. affirm whether he denies of concurs with this beief. e The ancient schoars in the ies of at-Tabari itera presents his eegesis by bringing in the opinions of a interprets min nafs wahidah to be referring to Adam number of schoars who opine that nafs wahidah does whie the word zaujaha refers to his spouse Eve. n not mean Adam but instead it means one singe sef or other words the verse according to him shows that from one singe type. The word zaujaha means wife or spouse a singe Adam, ve was created from his eft rib to be and the dhamir “ha” that is found in the word minha” his spouse. Al-Tabari further brings in the story of Eve’s refers to nafs wahidah which is defined as one type or creation from Adam’s rib while he was asleep as from that ery one type that the spouse of Adam was narrated by a-Suddi [23. created and thereby means Adam and ve were created A-Tabari’s view is supported by a prominent from the same materia that is cay [13]. mufassir such as a-Rai who not only opines that the The view of a-araghi is in ine with the iews of creation of Eve was from Adam’s left rib, but he aso certain present mufassir figures ie Muhammad Abduh.
Recommended publications
  • Exploring Methodological Aspects of Linguistic in the Quran and Its Tafsir
    EXPLORING METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF LINGUISTIC IN THE QURAN AND ITS TAFSIR Ferry Muhammadsyah Siregar∗ Abstract: Tulisan ini menelaah makna bahasa dan teks yang digunakan dalam Al-Qur’an. Dalam mengajarkan Islam, pada dasarnya berdasarkan dua sumber fundamental, yaitu Al-Qur’an dan tradisi Nabi. Bagi muslim, Al-Qur’an adalah Wahyu Ilahi. Al-Qur’an merupakan perkataan dari Tuhan dan kehadiran Ilahi pada ruang dan waktu sejarah. Melalui penyelidikan terhadap interpretasi sejarah berdasarkan aspek linguistik dalam Al- Qur’an, sebuah usaha dilakukan untuk meningkatkan definisi yang jelas mengenai tafsir dan bagaimana Al-Qur’an itu diinterpretasikan dalam sejarah Islam. Berdasarkan pada contoh-contoh tersebut, tulisan ini membahas tentang pendefinisian kembali tafsir dilihat dari bentuk khusus yang berhubungan dengan interpretasi Sarjana Muslim sebagai penterjemah dan aturan mendefinisikan karakteristik budaya berdasarkan tafsir dan termasuk penekanan dalam memahami aspek linguistik dan kemanusiaan, serta tahapan interpretasi yang harus dilakukan. Tulisan ini juga bertujuan untuk mendiskusikan metode interpretif dan hubungan dialektika terhadap teks Al- Qur’an dan konteks linguistik Al-Qur’an. This paper explores the meanings of language and text used in the Holy Scripture (the Quran). In Islam, its teachings are based essentially on two fundamental sources, the Qur’an and the prophetic tradition. For Muslims, the Qur’an is Divine Revelation. It is the very word of God and the presence of the Divine in space and time of the history. Through an examination ∗ ICRS-Yogya, the Graduate School, Gadjah Mada University 2 RELIGIA Vol. 15 No. 1, April 2012. Hlm. 1-13 of the historical interpretation based on linguistic aspects of the Quran, an attempt is made to develop a clearer definition of tafsir and how the Quran is interpreted in the history of Islam.
    [Show full text]
  • The Garment of Adam in Jewish, Muslim, and Christian Tradition
    24 The Garmentof Adam in Jewish, Muslim, and ChristianTradition Stephen D. Ricks Although rarely occurring in any detail, the motif of Adam's garment appears with surprising frequency in ancient Jewish and Christian literature. (I am using the term "Adam's garment" as a cover term to include any garment bestowed by a divine being to one of the patri­ archs that is preserved and passed on, in many instances, from one generation to another. I will thus also consider garments divinely granted to other patriarchal figures, including Noah, Abraham, and Joseph.) Although attested less often than in the Jewish and Christian sources, the motif also occurs in the literature of early Islam, espe­ cially in the Isra'iliyyiit literature in the Muslim authors al­ ThaclabI and al-Kisa'I as well as in the Rasii'il Ikhwiin al­ ~afa (Epistles of the Brethren of Purity). Particularly when discussing the garment of Adam in the Jewish tradition, I will shatter chronological boundaries, ranging from the biblical, pseudepigraphic, and midrashic references to the garment of Adam to its medieval attestations. 1 In what fol­ lows, I wish to consider (1) the garment of Adam as a pri­ mordial creation; (2) the garment as a locus of power, a symbol of authority, and a high priestly garb; and (3) the garment of Adam and heavenly robes. 2 705 706 STEPHEN D. RICKS 1. The Garment of Adam as a Primordial Creation The traditions of Adam's garment in the Hebrew Bible begin quite sparely, with a single verse in Genesis 3:21, where we are informed that "God made garments of skins for Adam and for his wife and clothed them." Probably the oldest rabbinic traditions include the view that God gave garments to Adam and Eve before the Fall but that these were not garments of skin (Hebrew 'or) but instead gar­ ments of light (Hebrew 'or).
    [Show full text]
  • Hadith and Its Principles in the Early Days of Islam
    HADITH AND ITS PRINCIPLES IN THE EARLY DAYS OF ISLAM A CRITICAL STUDY OF A WESTERN APPROACH FATHIDDIN BEYANOUNI DEPARTMENT OF ARABIC AND ISLAMIC STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW Thesis submitted for the degree of Ph.D. in the Faculty of Arts at the University of Glasgow 1994. © Fathiddin Beyanouni, 1994. ProQuest Number: 11007846 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 11007846 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 M t&e name of &Jla&, Most ©racious, Most iKlercifuI “go take to&at tfje iHessenaer aikes you, an& refrain from to&at tie pro&tfuts you. &nO fear gJtati: for aft is strict in ftunis&ment”. ©Ut. It*. 7. CONTENTS Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................4 Abbreviations................................................................................................................ 5 Key to transliteration....................................................................6 A bstract............................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Concept of Islamic Sufism
    Journal of Education & Social Policy Vol. 1 No. 1; June 2014 Understanding the Concept of Islamic Sufism Shahida Bilqies Research Scholar, Shah-i-Hamadan Institute of Islamic Studies University of Kashmir, Srinagar-190006 Jammu and Kashmir, India. Sufism, being the marrow of the bone or the inner dimension of the Islamic revelation, is the means par excellence whereby Tawhid is achieved. All Muslims believe in Unity as expressed in the most Universal sense possible by the Shahadah, la ilaha ill’Allah. The Sufi has realized the mysteries of Tawhid, who knows what this assertion means. It is only he who sees God everywhere.1 Sufism can also be explained from the perspective of the three basic religious attitudes mentioned in the Qur’an. These are the attitudes of Islam, Iman and Ihsan.There is a Hadith of the Prophet (saw) which describes the three attitudes separately as components of Din (religion), while several other traditions in the Kitab-ul-Iman of Sahih Bukhari discuss Islam and Iman as distinct attitudes varying in religious significance. These are also mentioned as having various degrees of intensity and varieties in themselves. The attitude of Islam, which has given its name to the Islamic religion, means Submission to the Will of Allah. This is the minimum qualification for being a Muslim. Technically, it implies an acceptance, even if only formal, of the teachings contained in the Qur’an and the Traditions of the Prophet (saw). Iman is a more advanced stage in the field of religion than Islam. It designates a further penetration into the heart of religion and a firm faith in its teachings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quranic Bases of Magic Prevention in Islamic Jurisprudence
    J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res., 3(3)1215-1223, 2013 ISSN 2090-4304 Journal of Basic and Applied © 2013, TextRoad Publication Scientific Research www.textroad.com The Quranic Bases of Magic Prevention in Islamic Jurisprudence Dr. Seyyed Mohammed Reza Ayati, Seyyed Mehdi Ahmadi Divinity & Philosophy Faculty ,Department of Law & Jurisprudence, Sciences and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran ABSTRACT The occult sciences which magic has a share in it has always been one of the challenging and convoluted subjects in all religions especially in Islam. The divisions taken from magic and witchcraft and the exceptions existent in the zone mentioned all imply prevention and make sentencing any divine law about the subject difficult. The merciful Quran has not said anything clearly about the prevention but there are some evidence and quotation in some verses that according to the interpreters in some cases which refers to wizardry, it is prevented by the merciful book. In other cases the merciful book knows God's will the only source of natural traverse in the universe. It considers no real basis for wizardry and when it is so, there would remain no place for prevention. On the other hand, it is seen in some quotations that some parts of the aforementioned subject is admissible thoroughly. KEYWORDS: Occult Sciences, Wizardry, Witchcraft, Quran, Spells INTRODUCTION Wizardry has an old background in religions and human history. Maybe we can know magic in a view the beginning of human sciences especially medicine. There were witches who cured spiritual and physical illness by special methods. They held the religious rituals in privacy.
    [Show full text]
  • God Gave Adam and Eve a New Son, Seth. Genesis 4:25
    God gave Adam and Eve a new son, Seth. Genesis 4:25 © GCP www.gcp.org Genesis 4 35 OK to photocopy for church and home use God gave Adam and Eve a new son, Seth. Genesis 4:25 Let’s Talk ASK Adam and Eve sinned against God. But God made a promise to take care of their sin. What did God promise? SAY He promised to send a Savior. God had a wonderful plan to send someone many years later from Eve’s family line who would pay for Adam and Eve’s sin and the sin of all God’s people. SAY First, God gave Adam and Eve two sons, Cain and Abel. Abel trusted God, but Cain did not. Cain killed Abel. ASK Some time later, God gave Adam and Eve a new son. What was his name? SAY God gave Adam and Eve a new son named Seth. Many years later, Jesus, God’s promised Savior, was born into Seth’s family line. God always keeps his promises! Let’s Sing and Do ac Bring several baby blankets or towels to class. Give each child a blanket. Do tr k Preschool these motions as you sing to the tune Here We Go Round the Mulberry Bush. 46 Vol. 2 CD 1 God made a promise to Adam and Eve, 2 Adam and Eve had baby Seth, Adam and Eve, Adam and Eve. Baby Seth, baby Seth. God made a promise to Adam and Eve— Adam and Eve had baby Seth— He promised to send a Savior! God would keep his promise! (wave blanket overhead, like a praise banner) (spread blanket, lay picture on it) 3 Through Seth’s family, Jesus came, 4 We believe God’s promises, Jesus came, Jesus came.
    [Show full text]
  • Eve's Answer to the Serpent: an Alternative Paradigm for Sin and Some Implications in Theology
    Calvin Theological Journal 33 (1998) : 399-420 Copyright © 1980 by Calvin Theological Seminary. Cited with permission. Scholia et Homiletica Eve's Answer to the Serpent: An Alternative Paradigm for Sin and Some Implications in Theology P. Wayne Townsend The woman said to the serpent, "We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, but God did say, `You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die. "' (Gen. 3:2-3) Can we take these italicized words seriously, or must we dismiss them as the hasty additions of Eve's overactive imagination? Did God say or mean this when he instructed Adam in Genesis 2:16-17? I suggest that, not only did Eve speak accu- rately and insightfully in responding to the serpent but that her words hold a key to reevaluating the doctrine of original sin and especially the puzzles of alien guilt and the imputation of sin. In this article, I seek to reignite discussion on these top- ics by suggesting an alternative paradigm for discussing the doctrine of original sin and by applying that paradigm in a preliminary manner to various themes in the- ology, biblical interpretation, and Christian living. I seek not so much to answer questions as to evoke new ones that will jar us into a more productive path of the- ological explanation. I suggest that Eve's words indicate that the Bible structures the ideas that we recognize as original sin around the concept of uncleanness.
    [Show full text]
  • The Muslim 500 2011
    The Muslim 500 � 2011 The Muslim The 500 The Muslim 500 � 2011 The Muslim The 500 The Muslim 500The The Muslim � 2011 500———————�——————— THE 500 MOST INFLUENTIAL MUSLIMS ———————�——————— � 2 011 � � THE 500 MOST � INFLUENTIAL MUSLIMS · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · All rights reserved. No part of this book may be repro- The Muslim 500: The 500 Most Influential Muslims duced or utilised in any form or by any means, electronic 2011 (First Edition) or mechanic, inclding photocopying or recording or by any ISBN: 978-9975-428-37-2 information storage and retrieval system, without the prior · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · written permission of the publisher. Views expressed in The Muslim 500 do not necessarily re- Chief Editor: Prof. S. Abdallah Schleifer flect those of RISSC or its advisory board. Researchers: Aftab Ahmed, Samir Ahmed, Zeinab Asfour, Photo of Abdul Hakim Murad provided courtesy of Aiysha Besim Bruncaj, Sulmaan Hanif, Lamya Al-Khraisha, and Malik. Mai Al-Khraisha Image Copyrights: #29 Bazuki Muhammad / Reuters (Page Designed & typeset by: Besim Bruncaj 75); #47 Wang zhou bj / AP (Page 84) Technical consultant: Simon Hart Calligraphy and ornaments throughout the book used courtesy of Irada (http://www.IradaArts.com). Special thanks to: Dr Joseph Lumbard, Amer Hamid, Sun- dus Kelani, Mohammad Husni Naghawai, and Basim Salim. English set in Garamond Premiere
    [Show full text]
  • Cumulative Merit List
    Cummulative Merit List of Shifa College of Medicine (Session: 2020-2021)- Dated: 5th February 2021 After completion of interview process following is the merit list of all the students who appeared in the interviews. The first 100 students will be offered admission in MBBS at SCM in first list. Deadline for fee submission is 4:00 pm on Monday, February 8th, 2021. After lapse of deadline, the remaining vacant seats would be offered to the students next in the merit list. Errors, omissions accepted till 10am on 8th February, 2021. PMC S.No applicationnu Name Father's Name Merit # mber 1 21623 HAMZAH NAUSHAD SIDDIQUI NAUSHAD ABID 93.200 2 14752 MARYAM RAUF Muhammad Rauf 91.632 3 22652 Amal Shahzad Khan Shahzad Khan 91.180 4 28526 MUHAMMAD UMAR RAFIQUE MUHAMMAD ZAFAR RAFIQUE 91.036 5 20640 Talha Rasool Sajjad Rasool Chaudhary 90.282 6 18267 EESHA RIZWAN RIZWAN AHMED 90.045 7 12964 Umar Fakhar Nawaid Fakhar 89.890 8 19618 Raveen Fatima Syed Asif Abbas Bukhari 89.850 9 13475 Syed Ali Turab Syed Sajjad Hussain Shah 89.755 10 31173 Muhammad Ahmed Bajwa Muhammad Farooq Bajwa 89.650 11 13678 MUHAMMAD MEHDI ALI ASAD ALI 89.577 12 21597 Aliza Syed Syed Nadeem Sadiq 89.559 13 15152 Muhammad Sajeel Turab Abu Turab 89.514 14 12109 Manahil Imran Imran Khalid 89.494 15 30637 Zuhayr Arif Jabbar Khan Arif Jabbar Khan 89.477 16 11849 Muhammad Muneeb Warriach Adnan Akbar 89.464 17 13779 MUHAMMAD AMMAD SALEEM MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAVAID 89.427 18 26793 Fatima Usman Usman Khalid 89.354 19 17319 Sayyeda Farooq Bajwa Farooq Amin Bajwa 89.323 20 13675 Alizeh Naeem
    [Show full text]
  • Another Look at Cain: from a Narrative Perspective
    신학논단 제102집 (2020. 12. 31): 241-263 https://doi.org/10.17301/tf.2020.12.102.241 Another Look at Cain: From a Narrative Perspective Wm. J McKinstry IV, MATS Adjunct Faculty, Department of General Education Presbyterian University and Theological Seminary In the Hebrew primeval histories names often carry significant weight. Much etymological rigour has been exercised in determining many of the names within the Bible. Some of the meaning of these names appear to have a consensus among scholars; among others there is less consensus and more contention. Numerous proposals have come forward with varying degrees of convincing (or unconvincing as the case may be) philological arguments, analysis of wordplays, possi- ble textual emendations, undiscovered etymologies from cognates in other languages, or onomastic studies detailing newly discovered names of similarity found in other ancient Semitic languages. Through these robust studies, when applicable, we can ascertain the meanings of names that may help to unveil certain themes or actions of a character within a narrative. For most of the names within the primeval histories of Genesis, the 242 신학논단 제102집(2020) meaning of a name is only one feature. For some names there is an en- compassing feature set: wordplay, character trait and/or character role, and foreshadowing. Three of the four members in the first family in Genesis, Adam, Eve, and Abel, have names that readily feature all the elements listed above. Cain, however, has rather been an exception in this area, further adding to Genesis 4’s enigmaticness in the Hebrew Bible’s primeval history. While three characters (Adam, Eve, and Abel) have names that (1) sound like other Hebrew words, that are (2) sug- gestive of their character or actions and (3) foreshadow or suggest fu- ture events about those characters, the meaning of Cain’s name does not render itself so explicitly to his character or his role in the narrative, at least not to the same degree of immediate conspicuousness.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazing Facts Study Guide-02 Did God Create the Devil
    Amazing Facts Study Guide 2 - Did God Create the Devil? Most people in the world are being deceived by an evil genius bent on destroying their lives - a brilliant mastermind called the devil, or Satan. But this dark prince is much more than what you might think... many say he's just a devious mythical figure, but the Bible says he's very real, and he's deceiving families, churches, and even nations to increase sorrow and pain. Here are the Bible's amazing facts about this prince of darkness and how you can overcome him! 1. With whom did sin originate? "The devil sinneth from the beginning." 1 John 3:8. "That old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan." Revelation 12:9. Answer: Satan, also called the devil, is the originator of sin. Without the Scriptures, the origin of evil would remain unexplained. 2. What was Satan's name before he sinned? Where was he living at that time? "How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning!" Isaiah 14:12. Jesus said, "I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven." Luke 10:18. "Thou wast upon the holy mountain of God." Ezekiel 28:14. Answer: His name was Lucifer, and he was living in heaven. Lucifer is symbolized by the king of Babylon in Isaiah 14 and as the king of Tyrus in Ezekiel 28. 3. What was the origin of Lucifer? What responsible position did he hold? How does the Bible describe him? "Thou wast created." Ezekiel 28:13, 15. "Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth." Ezekiel 28:14.
    [Show full text]
  • PROGRAM NOTES the Classical Master Josef Haydn and The
    Program Notes The Classical master Josef Haydn and the idiosyncratic minimalist Arvo Pärt may seem like a musical odd couple, but this afternoon’s pairing brings to- gether two composers who share some fundamental characteristics. Both are men of a deep personal faith which is often reflected in their music. And both were unafraid to reference contemporary events in their music. Haydn’s title Missa in Tempore Belli (Mass in a Time of War) was his own, and refers to the Napoleonic wars, which were played out in large measure on Austrian soil. Pärt dedicated his 2008 Symphony No. 4 “Los Angeles” to Mikhail Khodoro- vsky, the Russian oil magnate, philanthropist, and vocal critic of the Putin government, whose imprisonment was widely thought to be politically mo- tivated, and his selection of the text for Adam’s Lament is his response to the ongoing tensions between Islamic and Christian worlds. Estonian-born Arvo Pärt (b. 1935) reinvented his compositional style after making an early name for himself as an avant garde composer. His early com- positions were fiercely atonal and serial, but he also experimented with aleatoric music, where he might indicate the range of pitches for a given voice but not specify discrete pitches, rhythms or durations, and collage music, in which he layered phrases of music from composers like Bach onto his own 12- tone music. The premiere of Pärt’s 1968 Credo, a choral collage piece, caused something of an uproar. The use of the liturgical text had not been approved by the Soviet composers’ union and the work was subsequently banned in the Soviet Union.
    [Show full text]