Méthodologie De L'inventaire Des ZNIEFF Vise Surtout À

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Méthodologie De L'inventaire Des ZNIEFF Vise Surtout À Avifaune Gorgebleue à miroir blanc Mammifères modernisation de l’inventaire des Chat sauvage zzones nnaturelles d’iintérêt Batraciens éécologique ffloristique Triton alpestre et ffaunistique de picardie Reptiles Lézard des souches méthodologie de l’inventaire Odonates Cordulégastre annelé Décembre 2001 Lépidoptères Zygène de carniole Mission Réalisée par le Conservatoire des Sites Naturels de Picardie Orthoptères avec l’appui scientifique Criquet ensanglanté du Conseil Scientifique Régional du Patrimoine Naturel Bryophytes Aulacomnium palustre Avec le concours de : Picardie Nature Association Des Entomologistes De Picardie Conservatoire Botanique National de Bailleul / Centre Régional de Phytosociologie Flore vasculaire Osmonde royale Cours d’eau Brochet MINISTERE DE L’ECOLOGIE ET DU DEVELOPPEMENT DURABLE DIRECTION REGIONALE DE L'ENVIRONNEMENT DE PICARDIE CONSEIL REGIONAL DE PICARDIE UNION EUROPEENNE MODERNISATION DE L'INVENTAIRE DES ZONES NATURELLES D’INTERET ECOLOGIQUE FAUNISTIQUE ET FLORISTIQUE DE PICARDIE MÉTHODOLOGIE DE L’INVENTAIRE Décembre 2001 Coordination et réalisation : Conservatoire des Sites Naturels de Picardie Rédaction et coordination scientifique (par ordre alphabétique) : BARDET O., COPPA G., FLIPO S., FRANÇOIS R., HAUGUEL J.-C., PAGNIEZ P., SALVAN S. Coordination générale : PAGNIEZ P. Avec le concours de : 9 Picardie-Nature (L. GAVORY) : méthodologie « Avifaune », 9 Association Des Entomologistes de Picardie (M. DUQUEF) : méthodologie « Lépidoptères» et contribution à la méthodologie « Odonates ». 9 Conservatoire Botanique National de Bailleul / Centre Régional de Phytosociologie (V. BOULLET) : méthodologie « Flore vasculaire ». Autres contributions scientifiques et relectures par divers spécialistes cités dans le tableau page suivante. Validation scientifique du Conseil Scientifique Régional du Patrimoine Naturel. Illustration de la page de couverture : J. CHEVALLIER. SOMMAIRE INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................1 1. CRITÈRES DE SÉLECTION DES ZNIEFF.........................................................................................1 1.1. Evaluation par groupe taxonomique......................................................................................2 1.2. Evaluation globale ...................................................................................................................2 2. CRITÈRES DE SÉLECTION DES ESPÈCES DÉTERMINANTES.....................................................3 2.1. Critère de bioévaluation : le coefficient de rareté régional..................................................3 2.2. Critères d’interprétation..........................................................................................................3 2.3. Autres critères..........................................................................................................................4 3. CRITÈRES DE DÉLIMITATION DES ZNIEFF....................................................................................5 3.1. Démarche générale..................................................................................................................5 3.2. Milieux.......................................................................................................................................6 3.3. Harmonisation des contours ..................................................................................................7 3.3.1. Cohérence avec d'autres inventaires ...............................................................................7 3.3.2. Cohérence interrégionale .................................................................................................7 3.3.3. Révision / fusion des contours..........................................................................................7 4. CRITÈRES DE CHOIX DES TYPES (I ou II) ......................................................................................8 4.1. ZNIEFF de type I.......................................................................................................................8 4.2. ZNIEFF de type II......................................................................................................................9 4.3. Quelques exemples de choix de ZNIEFF de type I et de type II...........................................9 4.3.1. Département de la Somme...............................................................................................9 4.3.2. Département de l'Oise......................................................................................................9 4.3.3. Département de l'Aisne ....................................................................................................9 5. ÉLABORATION DES LISTES D'ESPÈCES DÉTERMINANTES .....................................................10 5.1. Avifaune..................................................................................................................................10 5.1.1. Remarques préliminaires................................................................................................10 5.1.2. Critères de sélection des espèces déterminantes ..........................................................11 5.1.3. Critères de sélection des sites........................................................................................16 5.1.4. Bibliographie...................................................................................................................17 5.2. Mammifères............................................................................................................................21 5.2.1. Remarques préliminaires................................................................................................21 5.2.2. Critères de sélection des espèces déterminantes ..........................................................23 5.2.3. Bibliographie...................................................................................................................25 5.3. Batraciens/Reptiles................................................................................................................26 5.3.1. Remarques préliminaires................................................................................................26 5.3.2. Critères de sélection des espèces déterminantes ..........................................................27 5.3.3. Quelques remarques complémentaires..........................................................................29 5.3.4. Bibliographie...................................................................................................................29 5.4. Odonates ...............................................................................................................................30 5.4.1. Remarques préliminaires................................................................................................30 5.4.2. Critères de sélection des espèces déterminantes ..........................................................30 5.4.3. Bibliographie...................................................................................................................32 5.5. Lépidoptères ..........................................................................................................................37 5.5.1. Catégorie de Lépidoptères concernés............................................................................37 5.5.2. Critères de sélection des espèces déterminantes ..........................................................38 5.5.3. Bibliographie...................................................................................................................39 5.6. Orthoptères ............................................................................................................................43 5.6.1. Remarques préliminaires et critères de sélection des espèces déterminantes.............................43 5.6.2. Bibliographie...................................................................................................................43 5.7. Bryophytes.............................................................................................................................45 5.7.1. Remarques préliminaires................................................................................................45 5.7.2. Critères de sélection des espèces déterminantes ..........................................................45 5.7.3. Bibliographie...................................................................................................................47 5.8. Flore vasculaire......................................................................................................................49 Préambule...................................................................................................................................................49 5.8.1. Signification des trois grandes catégories de critères.....................................................49 5.8.2. Nature et combinaison des critères pour la sélection des taxons déterminants............................56 5.9. Méthodologie appliquée aux cours d’eau............................................................................62 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................62 5.9.1. Données considérées.....................................................................................................63
Recommended publications
  • Spanish Pyrenees 15 – 22 June 2016
    Spanish Pyrenees 15 – 22 June 2016 Participants Sue and Peter Burge Elonwy and Peter Crook Helen and Malcolm Crowder Jackie and Ray Guthrie Ann Stearns Leader Chris Gibson, who also wrote this report. Our hosts: Melanie and Peter Rich at Casa Sarasa www.casasarasa.com Photos by Chris Gibson (CG), Helen Crowder (HC) and Peter Crook (PC), all taken during this holiday. At the end of this report there are photos of some of the non-British moths seen during the week. Front cover: enjoying Aisa valley (CG). Below: eating outside on the last evening (CG) and the green pastures of the upper Hecho valley (HC). This holiday, as for every Honeyguide holiday, also puts something into conservation in our host country by way of a contribution to the wildlife that we enjoyed, in this case for La Sociedad Española de Ornitología (SEO), the Spanish Ornithological Society, and its work in Aragón. The conservation contribution this year of £40 per person was supplemented by gift aid through the Honeyguide Wildlife Charitable Trust, leading to a total of £440 This donation brings the total given to SEO since the first Honeyguide holiday in Spain in 1991 to £16,745 (through all Honeyguide holidays, mostly the Spanish Pyrenees and Extremadura). As at July 2016, the total for all conservation contributions through Honeyguide since 1991 was £108,716. 2 DAILY DIARY Wednesday 15 June: The way there… What should have been a simple journey, Stansted to Biarritz then minibus to Berdún, had by 8pm turned out rather differently. After a series of delays due to thundery weather our flight eventually got onto French tarmac an hour late, where we were held on the plane because of the heavy rain, although any benefit from that was soon negated when we had to wait outside, in the continuing deluge, while another plane took off.
    [Show full text]
  • (Lepidoptera, Arctiidae, Arctiinae) Палеарктики И
    Åâðàçèàòñêèé ýíòîìîë. æóðíàë 3(1): 1124 © EUROASIAN ENTOMOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2004 Îñíîâíûå ïóòè ôîðìèðîâàíèÿ è ñòàíîâëåíèÿ òàêñîíîìè÷åñêîãî ðàçíîîáðàçèÿ ìåäâåäèö (Lepidoptera, Arctiidae, Arctiinae) Ïàëåàðêòèêè è ñîïðåäåëüíûõ òåððèòîðèé Major distribution routes for the formation of tiger moth diversity in the Palaearctic and adjacent territories (Lepidoptera, Arctiidae, Arctiinae) Â.Â. Äóáàòîëîâ V.V. Dubatolov Ñèáèðñêèé çîîëîãè÷åñêèé ìóçåé Èíñòèòóòà ñèñòåìàòèêè è ýêîëîãèè æèâîòíûõ ÑÎ ÐÀÍ, óë. Ôðóíçå 11, Íîâîñèáèðñê 630091 Ðîññèÿ. E-mail: [email protected]. Siberian Zoological Museum, Institute of Animal Systematics and Ecology, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Frunze str. 11, Novosibirsk 630091 Russia. Êëþ÷åâûå ñëîâà: ôàóíîãåíåç, Ïàëåàðêòèêà, Åâðàçèÿ, ìåäâåäèöû, Arctiidae, Arctiinae. Key words: faunogenesis, Palearctic, Eurasia, tiger moths, Arctiidae, Arctiinae. Ðåçþìå. Íà îñíîâå äàííûõ ïî èçìåíåíèþ ëàíä- ïîòîì ëåñàìè ñ ó÷àñòèåì øèðîêîëèñòâåííûõ ïî- øàôòîâ â íåîãåíå, ïëåéñòîöåíå è ãîëîöåíå, à òàêæå ðîä, îòñòóïèâøèìè äàëåêî íà þã âî âòîðîé ïîëîâè- èçó÷åíèÿ ñîâðåìåííîãî ðàñïðîñòðàíåíèÿ, ðåêîíñò- íå ïëèîöåíà, ê ýòîìó âðåìåíè ìîæíî ïðèâÿçàòü ðóèðîâàíû âåðîÿòíûå ïóòè ôîðìèðîâàíèÿ ìåäâå- èñ÷åçíîâåíèå êîíòàêòà ìåæäó íåìîðàëüíûìè ôàó- äèö Ïàëåàðêòèêè è ñîïðåäåëüíûõ òåððèòîðèé. Åñëè íàìè Ñåâåðíîé Àìåðèêè è Âîñòî÷íîé Àçèè, ïðè- äëÿ ïðåäïîëîæåíèÿ ãåíåçèñà ñîâðåìåííûõ âèäîâ âåäøåå ê îòñóòñòâèþ îáùèõ âèäîâ íà ýòèõ òåððèòî- ñëåäóåò èñïîëüçîâàòü òîëüêî äàííûå ïî ãîëîöåíó è ðèÿõ â íàñòîÿùåå âðåìÿ. Ïðîíèêíîâåíèå ÷åðåç âåðõíåìó ïëåéñòîöåíó, òî äëÿ âûÿâëåíèÿ ãåíåçèñà Áåðèíãèþ â îáîèõ íàïðàâëåíèÿõ àðêòè÷åñêèõ, áî- ðîäîâ è òðèá ñëåäóåò èñïîëüçîâàòü äàííûå ïî áî- ðåàëüíûõ è ÷àñòè÷íî òåìïåðàòíûõ ñîâðåìåííûõ ëåå äðåâíèì ýïîõàì íåîãåíó è êîíöó ïàëåîãåíà. âèäîâ íàèáîëåå âåðîÿòíî ïðîèñõîäèëî âî âðåìÿ îëå- Íà îñíîâå ñîâðåìåííûõ çíàíèé ïîêà íåâîçìîæíî äåíåíèé ïëåéñòîöåíà. Îáðàçîâàíèå òóíäðîâîé ôà- òî÷íî ïðåäïîëîæèòü ìåñòî âîçíèêíîâåíèÿ äàííîãî óíû íà÷àëîñü â ñâÿçè ñ ïåðâûì â êàéíîçîå âîçíèê- ïîäñåìåéñòâà, ðàñïðîñòðàí¸ííîãî âñåñâåòíî.
    [Show full text]
  • Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, Microsites and Traits of Noctuidae and Butterflies
    Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, microsites and traits of Noctuidae and butterflies Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 35 Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, microsites and traits of Noctuidae and butterflies Ken G.M. Bond and Tom Gittings Department of Zoology, Ecology and Plant Science University College Cork Citation: Bond, K.G.M. and Gittings, T. (2008) Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, microsites and traits of Noctuidae and butterflies. Irish Wildlife Manual s, No. 35. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover photo: Merveille du Jour ( Dichonia aprilina ) © Veronica French Irish Wildlife Manuals Series Editors: F. Marnell & N. Kingston © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2008 ISSN 1393 – 6670 Database of Irish Lepidoptera ____________________________ CONTENTS CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................................1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................2 The concept of the database.....................................................................................................................2 The structure of the database...................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Artigo / Artículo / Article
    ISSN: 1989-6581 Magro (2013) www.aegaweb.com/arquivos_entomoloxicos ARQUIVOS ENTOMOLÓXICOS, 8: 191-208 ARTIGO / ARTÍCULO / ARTICLE Atlas provisional de los lepidópteros heteróceros de Castilla y León, España: precisiones sobre la distribución del género Chelis Rambur, 1866 (Lepidoptera: Aganidae: Arctiinae). Rafael Magro c/ García Morato, 23, 9 Ñ. E-47007 VALLADOLID (ESPAÑA). e-mail: [email protected] Resumen: Se presenta un atlas provisional de los lepidópteros de Castilla y León en cuadrículas UTM (Universal Transverse Mercator). Las especies tratadas pertenecen a los táxones Chelis maculosa ([Denis et Schiffermüller], 1775), Chelis arragonensis (Staudinger, 1894) y Chelis simplonica (Boisduval, 1840) (Aganidae: Arctiinae). Se incluyen comentarios biogeográficos sobre el género. Además se estudia la variabilidad cromática y morfológica del habitus. Palabras clave: Lepidoptera, Aganidae, Arctiinae, Chelis, Castilla y León, España. Abstract: Provisional atlas of Lepidoptera Heterocera of Castilla y León, Spain: precisions on the distribution of the genus Chelis Rambur, 1866 (Lepidoptera: Aganidae: Arctiinae). A provisional atlas of the Lepidoptera from Castilla y León is presented in UTM (Universal Transverse Mercator) squares. The species dealt with belong to the taxa Chelis maculosa ([Denis et Schiffermüller], 1775), Chelis arragonensis (Staudinger, 1894) and Chelis simplonica (Boisduval, 1840) (Noctuidae: Arctiinae). Biogeographical comments on the genus are provided. The chromatic and morphological variability of the habitus is also studied. Key words: Lepidoptera, Aganidae, Arctiinae, Chelis, Castilla y León, Spain. Recibido: 15 de febrero de 2013 Publicado on-line: 1 de marzo de 2013 Aceptado: 22 de febrero de 2013 Introducción Este trabajo constituye la primera entrega de una serie sobre la distribución de los lepidópteros heteróceros de Castilla y León en mapas de cuadrículas UTM, que se publicará paulatinamente.
    [Show full text]
  • Noctuoid Moths (Lepidoptera: Erebidae, Nolidae, Noctuidae) of North-East Kazakhstan (Pavlodar Region)
    Ukrainian Journal of Ecology Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 2017, 7(2), 142–164, doi: 10.15421/2017_32 ORIGINAL ARTICLE UDC 595.786 Noctuoid moths (Lepidoptera: Erebidae, Nolidae, Noctuidae) of North-East Kazakhstan (Pavlodar Region) S.V. Titov1, A.V. Volynkin2,3, V.V. Dubatolov4, M. Černila5, S.M. Reznichenko6 & V.S. Bychkov7 1 The Research Centre for Environmental 'Monitoring', S. Toraighyrov Pavlodar State University, Lomova str. 64, KZ-140008, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Altai State University, Lenina pr. 61, Barnaul, RF-656049, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 3 Tomsk State University, Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecology, Lenina pr. 36, RF-634050, Tomsk, Russia 4 Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, SB RAS, Frunze str. 11, RF-630091, Novosibirsk, Russia E-mail: [email protected] 5 The Slovenian Museum of Natural History, Prešernova 20, SI-1001, Ljubljana, Slovenia. E-mail: [email protected] 6 Shcherbakty branch of the Republican methodical center of phytosanitary diagnostics and forecasts, Sovetov 44, KZ-141000, Sharbakty, Shcherbakty distr., Pavlodar Region. E-mail: [email protected] 7 Institute of Archaeology named after A. Kh. Margulan, 44 Avenue Dostyk, st. Shevchenko 28, KZ-050010, Almaty, Kazakhstan. E-mail: [email protected] Submitted: 02.04.2017. Accepted: 23.05.2017 The paper contains data on the fauna of the Lepidoptera families Erebidae, Nolidae and Noctuidae of Pavlodar Region (North-East Kazakhstan). The check list includes 480 species (100 species of Erebidae, 8 species of Nolidae and 372 species of Noctuidae), 393 species are reported for the region for the first time. The map of collecting localities and pictures of the main landscapes of the region are presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Premières Données Sur La Communauté De Lépidoptères
    Premières données sur la communauté de Lépidoptères nocturnes de l’île de Bagaud (archipel des Iles d’Hyères, Parc national de Port-Cros) Julie Braschi, Philippe Ponel, Jean-Pierre Hebrard, Marion Fouchard To cite this version: Julie Braschi, Philippe Ponel, Jean-Pierre Hebrard, Marion Fouchard. Premières données sur la communauté de Lépidoptères nocturnes de l’île de Bagaud (archipel des Iles d’Hyères, Parc national de Port-Cros). Scientific Reports of the Port-Cros National Park, Parc National de Port-Cros, 2018, pp.8. hal-01890139 HAL Id: hal-01890139 https://hal-amu.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01890139 Submitted on 8 Oct 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Sci. Rep. Port-Cros natl. Park, 32: 113-121 (2018) Premières données sur la communauté de Lépidoptères nocturnes de l’île de Bagaud (archipel des Iles d’Hyères, Parc national de Port-Cros) Julie BRASCHI1*, Philippe PONEL1*, Jean-Pierre HEBRARD2, Marion FOUCHARD3 1Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d’Ecologie marine et continentale (IMBE), Aix Marseille Univ, Univ Avignon, CNRS, IRD, Technopôle Arbois-Méditerranée, Bât. Villemin, BP 80, 13545 Aix-en-Provence cedex 04, France.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Taxonomy, Phylogeography and Conservation in the Genus
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Spixiana, Zeitschrift für Zoologie Jahr/Year: 2016 Band/Volume: 039 Autor(en)/Author(s): Ortiz Antonio S., Rubio Rosa Maria, Guerrero Juan José, Garre Manuel, Hausmann Axel Artikel/Article: Integrated taxonomy, phylogeography and conservation in the genus Chelis Rambur, [1866] in the Iberian Peninsula (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Arctiinae) 273- 286 ©Zoologische Staatssammlung München/Verlag Friedrich Pfeil; download www.pfeil-verlag.de SPIXIANA 39 2 273-286 München, Dezember 2016 ISSN 0341-8391 Integrated taxonomy, phylogeography and conservation in the genus Chelis Rambur, [1866] in the Iberian Peninsula (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Arctiinae) Antonio S. Ortiz, Rosa M. Rubio, Juan J. Guerrero, Manuel Garre & Axel Hausmann Ortiz, A. S., Rubio, R. M., Guerrero, J. J., Garre, M. & Hausmann, A. 2016. Inte- grated taxonomy, phylogeography and conservation in the genus Chelis Rambur, [1866] in the Iberian Peninsula (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Arctiinae). Spixiana 39 (2): 273-286. The taxonomy of Chelis, a genus distributed within the Palaearctic region, is re- vised based on morphological and molecular data (DNA barcodes) in the Iberian Peninsula. The neighbour-joining and maximum likelihood trees, combined with adult male genitalia and morphology, support the existence of three species indicat- ing two major lineages, one corresponding to mountainous taxa (Chelis arragonensis and C. cantabrica), with restricted distribution, and the other represented by Chelis maculosa, a taxon with a broad European distribution and a great number of in- fraspecific taxa. Haplotypic variation is highly concordant with species taxonomy; the variation at a continental scale reveals a significant geographic pattern of haplo- groups: C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Beech Forests As Reservoirs of Moth Diversity in Mediterranean Basin (Lepidoptera) Marco INFUSINO 1,*, Stefano SCALERCIO 1
    Fragmenta entomologica, 50 (2): 161-169 (2018) eISSN: 2284-4880 (online version) pISSN: 0429-288X (print version) Research article Submitted: October 2nd, 2018 - Accepted: December 5th, 2018 - Published: December 31st, 2018 The importance of beech forests as reservoirs of moth diversity in Mediterranean Basin (Lepidoptera) Marco INFUSINO 1,*, Stefano SCALERCIO 1 1 Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Forestry and Wood (CREA-FL) - Contrada Li Rocchi, 87036 Rende (CS), Italy - [email protected]; [email protected] * Corresponding author Abstract Study analyzes the macrolepidoptera assemblages in beech woodlands of the Orsomarso Mountains (Pollino National Park, Southern Italy) to assess the role of beech forests in preserving diversity in Mediterranean Basin. Research was run between 2015 and 2016 in 15 stands representative of the main successional stages of forest maturation, placed between 990 and 1,475 meters of elevation. Monthly- based sampling was performed using UV-LED light traps. A total of 33,957 individuals belonging to 410 species was collected. The community is rich and the most abundant and characteristic species (Eilema lurideola, Operophtera fagata, Campaea margaritata) are almost all trophically linked to broadleaves or lichens. The community structure appears fairly constant and recognizable in all stands over the two years of sampling. Young beech forests hosted the greatest number of species compared to other forest maturation stages, though the difference is small. The greatest differences in the community structure are found in the clearings, where generalist and/or related to the herbaceous layer species are mostly represented. Biogeographically widely distributed species prevail, 87% of them hav- ing European or Asian-European distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Driemaandelijks Tijdschrift Van De
    Macrolepidoptera from the steppes of Dobrogea (south-eastern Romania) Levente Székely, Vlad Dincă & István Juhász Abstract. Based on material collected during 2007–2009, we report 225 species of macrolepidoptera from the steppes of Dobrogea (south-eastern Romania). Besides numerous rare species with particular ecological preferences, we report Tarachidia candefacta (Hübner, [1831]) (Noctuidae) and Rhodostrophia discopunctata Amsel, 1935 (Geometridae) for the first time in the Romanian entomofauna. Several taxa of high zoogeographical significance for the Romanian and European fauna are commented. The conservation status and interest of the steppe areas from Dobrogea is brought into discussion. Samenvatting. Macrolepidoptera van de Dobrogea steppen (Zuidoost-Roemenië) Gebaseerd op materiaal verzameld tussen 2007 tot 2009, melden we 225 soorten Macrolepidoptera uit de steppen van Dobrogea (Zuidoost-Roemenië). Naast talrijke zeldzame soorten met specifieke ecologische voorkeuren, rapporteren we voor het eerst het voorkomen van Tarachidia candefacta (Hübner, [1831]) (Noctuidae) en Rhodostrophia discopunctata Amsel, 1935 (Geometridae) in de Roemeense entomologische fauna. Verscheidene taxa met belangrijke zoögeografische betekenis voor de Roemeense en Europese fauna worden besproken. De behoudsstatus en betekenis van de steppegebieden in Dobrogea wordt ter discussie gebracht. Résumé. Macrolépidoptères des steppes de Dobrogea (Sud-Est de la Roumanie) Sur base du matériel recueilli entre 2007 et 2009, nous mentionnons 225 espèces de macrolépidoptères des steppes de la Dobroudja (Sud-Est de la Roumanie). En plus de nombreuses espèces rares avec des préférences écologiques particulières, nous rapportons pour la première fois la présence de Tarachidia candefacta (Hübner, [1831]) (Noctuidae) et de Rhodostrophia discopunctata Amsel, 1935 (Geometridae) dans l’entomofaune roumaine. Un commentaire est fait concernant plusieurs taxons d’une grande importance zoogéographique pour la faune roumaine et européenne.
    [Show full text]
  • MALÉ GRANTOVÉ SCHÉMA Záchranné Programy Pro Zvláště Chráněné Druhy II EHP Fondy 2009-2014
    MALÉ GRANTOVÉ SCHÉMA Záchranné programy pro zvláště chráněné druhy II EHP fondy 2009-2014 Název projektu: Studie a příprava odborných podkladů pro ochranu přástevníků mařinkového (Watsonarctia casta) a svízelového (Chelis maculosa) v letech 2015–2016 Konečný příjemce: Společnost pro ochranu motýlů (SOM) (předkladatel projektu) Datum: 31.7. 2016 1 O D B O R N Á Č Á S T 1 – Základní údaje Záchranné programy pro zvláště chráněné druhy II Číslo Výzvy MGS: EHP fondy 2009-2014 1. výzva Studie a příprava odborných podkladů pro ochranu Název projektu: přástevníků mařinkového (Watsonarctia casta) a svízelového (Chelis maculosa) v letech 2015–2016 Společnost pro ochranu motýlů (SOM) Předkladatel: 1.2. 2015 - 30.4. 2016 Období pokryté zprávou: Do 30.4. 2016 Délka trvání projektu: 2 2 – Technická část studie 2.1 – POPIS PROJEKTU 1. Rešerše literatury a identifikace historických lokalit Plánované rešerše se předpokládaly ke zpracování literatury a základního fondu publikací vztahujících se k území České republiky a to v základním rozsahu. Současně byla provedena excerpce historických lokalit s následnou identifikací (pokud byly jednoznačně místopisně umístěny). Rešerše vznikla i z dalších relevantních zdrojů (odpublikované práce z vědecké a populárně-naučné literatury) a byla průběžně doplňována. Jejím prvním výstupem byly mapy podle mapových polí s vymezením historických nálezů a potencionálně vhodnými plochami pro mapování – monitoring mapovatelů. 2. Rešerše sbírkového materiálu a dat Proběhla a navázala na předchozí rešerši (bod 1). V rámci zpracování dat spolupracovala přímo s Entomologickým oddělením Národního Muzea v Praze (kustod motýlí sbírky Ing. J. Šumpich). Obdobně do současnosti probíhá kontinuální rešerše sbírkového materiálu, datových sad, kartoték členů společnosti (všech) a dále specialistů na skupinu, faunistiku (např.
    [Show full text]
  • EL10 005 Cumbria Biodiversity Action Plan 2001.Pdf
    BI DIVERS TY 1 Acknowledgments 1 This Biodiversity Action Plan is the product of the hard work In addition to those organisations and individuals mentioned and dedication of a great many people over a period of nearly above, the following have also contributed to the production of three years. It is truly a ‘team effort’. this action plan in various ways: The Steering Committee comprises representatives of the Organisations following organisations: Country Landowners Association, Agricultural Development and Advisory Service, Allerdale Countryside Agency, Cumbria County Council, Cumbria Local Borough Council, Ambleside Field Society, Barrow Borough Development Agencies Forum, Cumbria Wildlife Trust, Eden Council, British Association for Shooting and Conservation, District Council, English Nature, Environment Agency, Farming British Trust for Conservation Volunteers, Butterfly Conservation, and Wildlife Advisory Group, Forestry Commission, Friends of Carlisle Bereavement Service, Carlisle City Council, Centre for the Lake District, Glaxo Wellcome, Lake District National Park Ecology and Hydrology, Copeland Borough Council, Countryside Authority, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, National Alliance, Countryside Management Service (Arnside/Silverdale Farmers’ Union, National Trust, North West Water Ltd and Royal AONB), Cumberland Rivers Foundation, Cumbria Bird Club, Society for the Protection of Birds. Special thanks are due to the Cumbria Broadleaves, Cumbria Farm Link, Cumbria Sea Fisheries Chairmen of the Steering Committee:
    [Show full text]
  • Potential for Biological Control of Phragmites Australis in North America
    Biological Control 23, 191–212 (2002) doi:10.1006/bcon.2001.0994, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on COMMENTARY Potential for Biological Control of Phragmites australis in North America Lisa Tewksbury,* Richard Casagrande,* Bernd Blossey,† Patrick Ha¨fliger,‡ and Mark Schwarzla¨nder‡,1 *Department of Plant Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island 02881; †Department of Natural Resources, Fernow Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853; and ‡CABI Bioscience Centre Switzerland, CH-2800 Dele´mont, Switzerland Received September 15, 2000; accepted September 5, 2001; published online December 12, 2001 lis will require considerable dialogue. This decision Phragmites australis is a cosmopolitan plant that is needs to weigh the current negative ecological and undergoing a population explosion in freshwater and economic impacts of P. australis and the benefits and tidal wetlands on the east coast of North America. The risks of a biological control program. © 2001 Elsevier Science rapid spread of P. australis in recent years and the Key Words: biological control; Phragmites australis; virtual absence of native herbivores feeding on P. aus- common reed; Platycephala planifrons; Archanara tralis have led wetland ecologists to believe that ei- geminipuncta; Arenostola phragmitidis; Rhizedra lu- ther the species or more aggressive genotypes were tosa; Phragmataecia castaneae; Chilo phragmitella; introduced. The historical record of the occurrence of Schoenobius gigantella; Giraudiella inclusa; acciden- P. australis in North America and the scarcity of in- tal introductions; insect herbivores; invasions. digenous herbivores provide conflicting evidence for the status of the species as native or introduced. A comparison of P. australis populations from North America and other continents using advanced genetic INTRODUCTION techniques is underway to help determine the status of current and historic North American genotypes.
    [Show full text]