DOCSLIB.ORG

En En Amendments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection 2020/0340(COD) 28.5.2021 AMENDMENTS 159 - 390 Draft opinion Sandro Gozi (PE691.362v01.00) European data governance (Data Governance Act) Proposal for a regulation (COM(2020)0767 – C9-0377/2020 – 2020/0340(COD)) AM\1232072EN.docx PE692.940v01-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_LegOpinion PE692.940v01-00 2/138 AM\1232072EN.docx EN Amendment 159 Maria Grapini, Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques, Leszek Miller, Marc Angel, Christel Schaldemose, Adriana Maldonado López Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (1) The Treaty on the functioning of (1) The Treaty on the functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’) provides for the European Union (‘TFEU’) provides for the establishment of an internal market and the establishment of an internal market and the institution of a system ensuring that the institution of a system ensuring that competition in the internal market is not competition in the internal market is not distorted. The establishment of common distorted. The establishment of common rules and practices in the Member States rules and practices in the Member States relating to the development of a framework relating to the development of a framework for data governance should contribute to for data governance should also contribute the achievement of those objectives. to the development of an internal market that allows the sustainable development of SMEs and micro-enterprises and fair competition. Or. en Amendment 160 Anne-Sophie Pelletier Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (2) Over the last few years, digital (2) Over the last few years, digital technologies have transformed the technologies have transformed the economy and society, affecting all sectors economy and society, affecting all sectors of activity and daily life. Data is at the of activity and daily life. Data is at the centre of this transformation: data-driven centre of this transformation: despite the innovation will bring enormous benefits for many risks involved, data-driven citizens, for example through improved innovation will bring enormous benefits for personalised medicine, new mobility, and citizens, for example through improved its contribution to the European Green personalised medicine, new mobility, and Deal23. In its Data Strategy24, the its contribution to the European Green Commission described the vision of a Deal23. In its Data Strategy24, the common European data space, a Single Commission described the vision of a Market for data in which data could be common European data space, a Single used irrespective of its physical location of Market for data in which data could be AM\1232072EN.docx 3/138 PE692.940v01-00 EN storage in the Union in compliance with used irrespective of its physical location of applicable law. It also called for the free storage in the Union in compliance with and safe flow of data with third countries, applicable law. It also called for the free subject to exceptions and restrictions for and safe flow of data with third countries, public security, public order and other subject to exceptions and restrictions for legitimate public policy objectives of the public security, public order and other European Union, in line with international legitimate public policy objectives of the obligations. In order to turn that vision into European Union, in line with international reality, it proposes to establish domain- obligations. In order to turn that vision into specific common European data spaces, as reality, it proposes to establish domain- the concrete arrangements in which data specific common European data spaces, as sharing and data pooling can happen. As the concrete arrangements in which data foreseen in that strategy, such common sharing and data pooling can happen. As European data spaces can cover areas such foreseen in that strategy, such common as health, mobility, manufacturing, European data spaces can cover areas such financial services, energy, or agriculture or as health, mobility, manufacturing, thematic areas, such as the European green financial services, energy, or agriculture or deal or European data spaces for public thematic areas, such as the European green administration or skills. deal or European data spaces for public administration or skills. __________________ __________________ 23 Communication from the Commission to 23 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the European Committee of the Regions on the European Green Deal. Brussels, 11.12.2019. Green Deal. Brussels, 11.12.2019. (COM(2019) 640 final). (COM(2019) 640 final). 24 COM(2020) 66 final. 24 COM(2020) 66 final. Or. fr Amendment 161 Andrey Kovatchev Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (3) It is necessary to improve the (3) It is necessary to improve the conditions for data sharing in the internal conditions for data sharing in the internal market, by creating a harmonised market, by creating a harmonised framework for data exchanges. Sector- framework for data exchanges. Sector- specific legislation can develop, adapt and specific legislation can develop, adapt and PE692.940v01-00 4/138 AM\1232072EN.docx EN propose new and complementary elements, propose new and complementary elements, depending on the specificities of the sector, depending on the specificities of the sector, such as the envisaged legislation on the such as the envisaged legislation on the European health data space25 and on access European health data space25 and on access to vehicle data. Moreover, certain sectors to vehicle data. Moreover, certain sectors of the economy are already regulated by of the economy are already regulated by sector-specific Union law that include rules sector-specific Union law that include rules relating to cross-border or Union wide relating to cross-border or Union wide sharing or access to data26 . This sharing or access to data26 . This Regulation is therefore without prejudice to Regulation is therefore without prejudice to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council (27 ), and in Parliament and of the Council (27 ), and in particular the implementation of this particular the implementation of this Regulation shall not prevent cross border Regulation shall not prevent cross border transfers of data in accordance with transfers of data in accordance with Chapter V of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 Chapter V of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 from taking place, Directive (EU) from taking place, Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council (28 ), Directive (EU) of the Council (28 ), Directive (EU) 2016/943 of the European Parliament and 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council (29 ), Regulation (EU) of the Council (29 ), Regulation (EU) 2018/1807 of the European Parliament and 2018/1807 of the European Parliament and of the Council (30 ), Regulation (EC) No of the Council (30 ), Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 of the European Parliament and 223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council (31 ), Directive 2000/31/EC of the Council (31 ), Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the of the European Parliament and of the Council (32 ), Directive 2001/29/EC of the Council (32 ), Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (33 European Parliament and of the Council (33 ), Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European ), Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council (34 ), Parliament and of the Council (34 ), Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (35 ), Parliament and of the Council (35 ), Directive (EU) 2019/1024 of the European Directive (EU) 2019/1024 of the European Parliament and of the Council (36 ), as well Parliament and of the Council (36 ), as well as Regulation 2018/858/EU of the as Regulation 2018/858/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (37 European Parliament and of the Council (37 ), Directive 2010/40/EU of the European ), Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (38 ) and Parliament and of the Council (38 ) and Delegated Regulations adopted on its basis, Delegated Regulations adopted on its basis, and any other sector-specific Union and any other sector-specific Union legislation that organises the access to and legislation that organises the access to and re-use of data. This Regulation should be re-use of data. This Regulation should be without prejudice to the access and use of without prejudice to the access and use of data for the purpose of international data for the purpose of international cooperation in the context of prevention, cooperation in the context of prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties. A horizontal regime for criminal penalties. A horizontal regime for the re-use of certain categories of protected the re-use of certain categories of protected AM\1232072EN.docx 5/138 PE692.940v01-00 EN data held by public sector bodies, the data held by public sector bodies, the provision of data sharing services and of provision of data sharing services and of services based on data altruism in the services based on data altruism in the Union should be established. Specific Union should be established. Specific characteristics of different sectors may characteristics of different sectors may require the design of sectoral data-based require the design of sectoral data-based systems, while building on the systems, while building on the requirements of this Regulation.
Recommended publications
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast

    European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast

    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
  • European Economic Congress 2015 Agenda

    European Economic Congress 2015 Agenda

    1 Agenda of the European Economic Congress 2015 Inaugural session 20 April 2015 10.00-18.00 The difficult Europe The effects of the crisis still impact the performance of economies and public finances of many European states. The spectre of stagnation is still there. Europe is burdened with unemployment and the lack of prospects for young people. The formally united European Community has to contend with a scarcity of actual cohesion. Internal contradictions hamper joint action, undermine the competitiveness of the economy and block free market mechanisms. Political instability around Europe hampers development planning and impedes initiative. The future of our Europe is a set of difficult questions. The European Economic Congress will attempt to answer them. 10.00-10.10 Opening of the Congress and reception of Guests: – Wojciech Kuśpik – Chairman of the Board, PTWP SA, Initiator of the European Economic Congress – Piotr Litwa – Voivode of Silesia – Wojciech Saługa – Marshal of the Silesian Voivodeship – Marcin Krupa – Mayor of Katowice – Jerzy Buzek – Member of the European Parliament, President of the European Parliament between 2009-2012, Prime Minister of the Republic of Poland between 1997-2001, Chairman of the Council of the EEC 10.10-10.30 Inaugural speeches: – Bronisław Komorowski – President of the Republic of Poland – Andrej Kiska – President of the Slovak Republic 10.30-12.00 300 billion for the new Europe. The large-scale investment programme of the European Union How to break stagnation in the economy? Demographic, political and economic risks The capital, regulations and leverage: the mechanics of the new financial vehicle More freedom and more responsibility: a comparison with previously used investment support mechanisms The role of the European Commission, financial market institutions and private investors The need for wise priorities.
  • 15.10.2020 A8-0200/1146 Amendment 1146 Asim Ademov

    15.10.2020 A8-0200/1146 Amendment 1146 Asim Ademov

    15.10.2020 A8-0200/1146 Amendment 1146 Asim Ademov, Daniel Buda, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Michaela Šojdrová, Balázs Hidvéghi, Jarosław Kalinowski, Michal Wiezik, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Siegfried Mureşan, Traian Băsescu, Vasile Blaga, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Gheorghe Falcă, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Eugen Tomac, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe-Vlad Nistor, Andrey Kovatchev, Andrey Novakov, Emil Radev, Eva Maydell, Alexander Alexandrov Yordanov, Radan Kanev, Krzysztof Hetman, Jarosław Duda, Andrzej Halicki, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Ewa Kopacz, Tomasz Frankowski, Adam Jarubas, Ivan Štefanec, Vladimír Bilčík, Tamás Deutsch, Enikő Győri, Andor Deli, Andrea Bocskor, Edina Tóth, Ádám Kósa, Kinga Gál on behalf of the EPP Group Atidzhe Alieva-Veli, Iskra Mihaylova, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Andrey Slabakov, Angel Dzhambazki, Carmen Avram, Adrian-Dragoş Benea, Rovana Plumb, Maria Grapini, Cristian Ghinea, Dragoș Pîslaru, Ramona Strugariu, Anna Fotyga, Anna Zalewska, Beata Kempa, Bogdan Rzońca, Dominik Tarczyński, Elżbieta Kruk, Elżbieta Rafalska, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Kosma Złotowski, Krzysztof Jurgiel, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Witold Jan Waszczykowski, Zbigniew Kuźmiuk, Leszek Miller, Bogusław Liberadzki, Łukasz Kohut, Martina Dlabajová, Dita Charanzová, Martin Hlaváček, Ondřej Knotek, Ondřej Kovařík, Alexandr Vondra, Evžen Tošenovský, Veronika Vrecionová, Ivan David, Kateřina Konečná, Roberts Zīle, Ruža Tomašić, Karol Karski, Robert Biedroń Report A8-0200/2019 Peter Jahr Common agricultural policy - support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States and financed by the EAGF and by the EAFRD COM(2018)0392 – C8-0248/2018 – 2018/0216(COD) Proposal for a regulation Article 132 a (new) Text proposed by the Commission Amendment Article 132a Transitional National Aid 1. Member States may continue to grant transitional national aid to farmers in any of the sectors authorised by the Commission in accordance with Article 132(7) or Article 133a(5) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 in 2013.
  • How Poland's EU Membership Helped Transform Its Economy Occasional

    How Poland's EU Membership Helped Transform Its Economy Occasional

    How Poland’s EU Membership Helped Transform its Economy Marek Belka Occasional Paper 88 Group of Thirty, Washington, D.C. About the Author Marek Belka is the President of the National Bank of Poland. After completing economic studies at the University of Łódź in 1972, Professor Belka worked in the university’s Institute of Economics. He earned a PhD in 1978 and a postdoctoral degree in economics in 1986. Since 1986, he has been associated with the Polish Academy of Sciences. During 1978–79 and 1985–86, he was a research fellow at Columbia University and the University of Chicago, respectively, and in 1990, at the London School of Economics. He received the title of Professor of Economics in 1994. Since the 1990s, Professor Belka has held important public positions both in Poland and abroad. In 1990, he became consultant and adviser at Poland’s Ministry of Finance, then at the Ministry of Ownership Transformations and the Central Planning Office. In 1996, he became consultant to the World Bank. During 1994–96, he was Vice-Chairman of the Council of Socio-Economic Strategy at Poland’s Council of Ministers, and later economic adviser to the President of the Republic of Poland. Professor Belka served as Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance on two occasions—in 1997, in the government of Włodzimierz Cimoszewicz, and during 2001–02, in the government of Leszek Miller. During 2004–05, he was Prime Minister of Poland. Since 2006, Professor Belka has been Executive Secretary of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, and since January 2009, he has been Director of the European Department at the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
  • 034499/EU XXVII. GP Eingelangt Am 09/10/20

    034499/EU XXVII. GP Eingelangt Am 09/10/20

    034499/EU XXVII. GP Eingelangt am 09/10/20 Council of the European Union Brussels, 9 October 2020 (OR. en) 11625/20 PE-QE 184 'I' ITEM NOTE From: General Secretariat of the Council To: Permanent Representatives Committee Subject: Replies to questions for written answer submitted to the Council by Members of the European Parliament – Examination by Coreper The Permanent Representatives Committee is invited to examine the draft replies to the questions for written answer set out in the documents listed in the Annex to this note. Pursuant to Article 12(2)(a) of the Council's Rules of Procedure, the Presidency intends to propose the use of the 'silence procedure' to adopt the texts of the replies to the abovementioned questions for written answer. 11625/20 PZ/vp 1 GIP.2 EN www.parlament.gv.at ANNEX Replies to questions for written answer submitted to the Council by Members of the European Parliament a) E-003883/2020 - Radka Maxová (Renew), Chrysoula Zacharopoulou (Renew), Dragoș Pîslaru (Renew), Klemen Grošelj (Renew), Jarosław Duda (PPE), Łukasz Kohut (S&D), Kateřina Konečná (GUE/NGL), Leszek Miller (S&D), Ville Niinistö (Verts/ALE), Olivier Chastel (Renew), Fabio Massimo Castaldo (NI), Salvatore De Meo (PPE), Miriam Lexmann (PPE), Elżbieta Kruk (ECR), Demetris Papadakis (S&D), Milan Brglez (S&D), Alex Agius Saliba (S&D), Manuel Pizarro (S&D), Karin Karlsbro (Renew), Robert Biedroń (S&D), Pascal Arimont (PPE), Magdalena Adamowicz (PPE), Marisa Matias (GUE/NGL), Viktor Uspaskich (Renew), Hilde Vautmans (Renew), Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska
  • Question for Written Answer

    Question for Written Answer

    Question for written answer E-002367/2021 to the Commission Rule 138 Łukasz Kohut (S&D), Terry Reintke (Verts/ALE), Cyrus Engerer (S&D), Leszek Miller (S&D), Manuel Pizarro (S&D), Olivier Chastel (Renew), Radka Maxová (S&D), Niklas Nienaß (Verts/ALE), Petar Vitanov (S&D), Andrzej Halicki (PPE), Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield (Verts/ALE), Ernest Urtasun (Verts/ALE), Robert Biedroń (S&D), Daniel Freund (Verts/ALE), Sylwia Spurek (Verts/ALE), Evelyne Gebhardt (S&D), Monika Vana (Verts/ALE), Lara Wolters (S&D), Vera Tax (S&D), Aurore Lalucq (S&D), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (The Left), Maria Grapini (S&D), Klemen Grošelj (Renew), Alexandra Geese (Verts/ALE), Sven Giegold (Verts/ALE), Magdalena Adamowicz (PPE), Marek Belka (S&D), Moritz Körner (Renew), Karen Melchior (Renew), Anna Júlia Donáth (Renew), Tineke Strik (Verts/ALE) Subject: Ensuring the availability of EU funding for final recipients – Regulation No 2020/2092 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget The Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation1 entered into force on 1 January 2021. Recital 19 of the Regulation states that: ‘It is essential that the legitimate interests of final recipients and beneficiaries are properly safeguarded when measures are adopted in the event of breaches of the principles of the rule of law ...Taking into consideration that in shared management payments from the Commission to Member States are legally independent from payments by national authorities to beneficiaries, appropriate measures under this Regulation should not be considered to affect the availability of funding for payments towards beneficiaries ...’ Further, pursuant to Article 5(5) of the Regulation: ‘on the basis of the information provided by the final recipients or beneficiaries ..
  • 17.3.2021 A9-0033/1 Amendment 1 István Ujhelyi, Cláudia Monteiro De

    17.3.2021 A9-0033/1 Amendment 1 István Ujhelyi, Cláudia Monteiro De

    17.3.2021 A9-0033/1 Amendment 1 István Ujhelyi, Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar, Elena Kountoura, Johan Danielsson, Giuseppe Ferrandino, Josianne Cutajar, Isabel García Muñoz, Benoît Lutgen, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi, Rovana Plumb, Sylvie Guillaume, Vera Tax, Andreas Schieder, Andris Ameriks, Sara Cerdas, Petar Vitanov, Klára Dobrev, Attila Ara-Kovács, Maria Grapini, Dominique Riquet, Csaba Molnár, Sándor Rónai, Ismail Ertug, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Clara Aguilera, Marcos Ros Sempere, Heléne Fritzon, Victor Negrescu, Inma Rodríguez-Piñero, Alexis Georgoulis, Alfred Sant, Erik Bergkvist, Carlos Zorrinho, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, César Luena, Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Cristina Maestre Martín De Almagro, Rosa D’Amato, Evin Incir, Marc Angel, Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques, Pedro Marques, Valter Flego, Katalin Cseh, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Seán Kelly, Ignazio Corrao, Isabel Santos, Alicia Homs Ginel, Robert Hajšel, Nacho Sánchez Amor, Javi López, Alex Agius Saliba, Demetris Papadakis, Marc Tarabella, Sergei Stanishev, Paolo De Castro, Anna Júlia Donáth, Nora Mebarek, Leszek Miller, Margarida Marques, Adriana Maldonado López, Lina Gálvez Muñoz, Eva Kaili, Juozas Olekas, Isabel Carvalhais, Hannes Heide, Márton Gyöngyösi, Estrella Durá Ferrandis, Monika Beňová, Pina Picierno, Dietmar Köster, Agnes Jongerius, Miroslav Číž, Günther Sidl, Pietro Bartolo, Ibán García Del Blanco, Jytte Guteland, Mónica Silvana González Report A9-0033/2021 Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar EU strategy for sustainable tourism (2020/2038(INI))
  • Uef-Spinelli Group

    Uef-Spinelli Group

    UEF-SPINELLI GROUP MANIFESTO 9 MAY 2021 At watershed moments in history, communities need to adapt their institutions to avoid sliding into irreversible decline, thus equipping themselves to govern new circumstances. After the end of the Cold War the European Union, with the creation of the monetary Union, took a first crucial step towards adapting its institutions; but it was unable to agree on a true fiscal and social policy for the Euro. Later, the Lisbon Treaty strengthened the legislative role of the European Parliament, but again failed to create a strong economic and political union in order to complete the Euro. Resulting from that, the EU was not equipped to react effectively to the first major challenges and crises of the XXI century: the financial crash of 2008, the migration flows of 2015- 2016, the rise of national populism, and the 2016 Brexit referendum. This failure also resulted in a strengthening of the role of national governments — as shown, for example, by the current excessive concentration of power within the European Council, whose actions are blocked by opposing national vetoes —, and in the EU’s chronic inability to develop a common foreign policy capable of promoting Europe’s common strategic interests. Now, however, the tune has changed. In the face of an unprecedented public health crisis and the corresponding collapse of its economies, Europe has reacted with unity and resolve, indicating the way forward for the future of European integration: it laid the foundations by starting with an unprecedented common vaccination strategy, for a “Europe of Health”, and unveiled a recovery plan which will be financed by shared borrowing and repaid by revenue from new EU taxes levied on the digital and financial giants and on polluting industries.
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Results

    European Parliament Elections 2019 - Results

    Briefing June 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Results Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 7 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 3 seats 2 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Heinz Christian Strache 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide 6. Alexander Bernhuber 7. Barbara Thaler NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 1. Maria Arena* Socialist Party (PS) Christian Social Party 3. Johan Van Overtveldt 2. Marc Tarabella* (S&D) 2 seats (CSP) (EPP) 1 seat New Flemish Alliance (N-VA) 1. Olivier Chastel (Greens/EFA) Reformist 2. Frédérique Ries* 4 seats Movement (MR) (ALDE) 2 seats 1. Philippe Lamberts* 2. Saskia Bricmont 1. Guy Verhofstadt* Ecolo (Greens/EFA) 2. Hilde Vautmans* 2 seats Open Flemish Liberals and Democrats (Open 1. Benoît Lutgen Humanist VLD) (ALDE) 2 seats democratic centre (cdH) (EPP) 1 seat 1. Kris Peeters Workers’ Party of 1.
  • Question for Written Answer

    Question for Written Answer

    Question for written answer E-003868/2020 to the Commission Rule 138 Radka Maxová (Renew), Chrysoula Zacharopoulou (Renew), Klemen Grošelj (Renew), Dragoș Pîslaru (Renew), Jarosław Duda (PPE), Łukasz Kohut (S&D), Kateřina Konečná (GUE/NGL), Leszek Miller (S&D), Ville Niinistö (Verts/ALE), Olivier Chastel (Renew), Fabio Massimo Castaldo (NI), Salvatore De Meo (PPE), Miriam Lexmann (PPE), Elżbieta Kruk (ECR), Demetris Papadakis (S&D), Milan Brglez (S&D), Alex Agius Saliba (S&D), Manuel Pizarro (S&D), Karin Karlsbro (Renew), Robert Biedroń (S&D), Pascal Arimont (PPE), Magdalena Adamowicz (PPE), Marisa Matias (GUE/NGL), Viktor Uspaskich (Renew), Hilde Vautmans (Renew), Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska (PPE), Katrin Langensiepen (Verts/ALE), Cindy Franssen (PPE), Sylvie Brunet (Renew), Ádám Kósa (PPE), Izaskun Bilbao Barandica (Renew), Laurence Farreng (Renew), Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó (NI), Antoni Comín i Oliveres (NI), Clara Ponsatí Obiols (NI), Atidzhe Alieva-Veli (Renew), Marianne Vind (S&D), José Gusmão (GUE/NGL), Krzysztof Hetman (PPE), Miriam Dalli (S&D), Jadwiga Wiśniewska (ECR), Alviina Alametsä (Verts/ALE), Brando Benifei (S&D) Subject: Disability focal points Already in 2015, the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) in its Concluding Observations recommended that disability focal points be appointed in all Commission Directorates-General (DGs) and agencies, in all EU institutions, together with the establishment of an interinstitutional coordination mechanism. The recommendation also forms part of several European Parliament resolutions 1 , and it has also been made by the European Economic and Social Committee. In spite of this, disability focal points have not yet been established. The only exception to this is the Commission’s UN CRPD in the Disability Unit of DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion 2 .
  • Poland's Civil Liberties Rating Improved from 2 to 1 Due to the Deepening Of

    Poland's Civil Liberties Rating Improved from 2 to 1 Due to the Deepening Of

    Page 1 of 4 Print Freedom in the World - Poland (2005) Ratings Change Political Rights: 1 Civil Liberties: Poland's civil liberties rating improved from 2 to 1 due to the 1* deepening of EU integration trends, resulting in greater Status: conformity with EU human rights standards. Free Population: Overview 38,200,000 GNI/Capita: Poland achieved its long-standing goal of joining the European $4,570 Union (EU) on May 1, 2004. However, the government declined Life Expectancy: in popularity over the course of the year. The prime minister, 75 Leszek Miller, announced his resignation in March, but this did Religious Groups: not stop his ruling party from suffering a major defeat in the Roman Catholic (95 percent), other European Parliament elections in June under his caretaker [including Eastern successor. Orthodox and Protestant] (5 percent) From the fourteenth to the eighteenth centuries, Poland and Ethnic Groups: Lithuania maintained a powerful state that Prussia, Austria, and Polish (96.7 percent), German Russia destroyed in three successive partitions. Poland enjoyed a (0.4 percent), other window of independence from 1918 to 1939, but was invaded by [including Byelorussian and Germany and the Soviet Union during World War II and was Ukrainian](2.9 forced into the Communist sphere at the end of the war. Polish percent) citizens endured decades of Soviet rule until 1989, the year Lech Capital: Walesa and the Solidarity trade union movement forced the Warsaw government to accept democratic reforms. Freedom in the Fundamental democratic and free market - oriented reforms were World 2005 introduced during the 1989-1991 period.
  • Protokół Posiedzenia W Dniu 27 Listopada 2019 R. (2021/C 203/03)

    Protokół Posiedzenia W Dniu 27 Listopada 2019 R. (2021/C 203/03)

    28.5.2021 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej C 203/155 Środa, 27 listopada 2019 r. PROTOKÓŁ POSIEDZENIA W DNIU 27 LISTOPADA 2019 R. (2021/C 203/03) Spis treści Strona 1. Otwarcie posiedzenia . 157 2. Debata nad przypadkami łamania praw człowieka, zasad demokracji i państwa prawa (ogłoszenie złożonych 157 projektów rezolucji) . 3. Przedstawienie kolegium komisarzy i ich programu przez nowo wybraną przewodniczącą Komisji (debata) 158 4. Wznowienie posiedzenia . 159 5. Oficjalne powitanie . 159 6. Głosowanie . 159 6.1. Wybór Komisji (głosowanie) . 160 6.2. Uruchomienie Funduszu Solidarności Unii Europejskiej w celu udzielenia pomocy Grecji 160 (głosowanie) . 6.3. Uruchomienie instrumentu elastyczności na sfinansowanie natychmiastowych środków budżeto- wych służących do rozwiązywania bieżących problemów wynikających z migracji, napływu 160 uchodźców i zagrożeń bezpieczeństwa (głosowanie) . 6.4. Uruchomienie Funduszu Solidarności Unii Europejskiej w celu zapewnienia środków na wypłatę 161 zaliczek w budżecie ogólnym Unii na 2020 r. (głosowanie) . 6.5. Procedura budżetowa 2020: wspólny projekt (głosowanie) . 161 7. Wyjaśnienia dotyczące stanowiska zajętego w głosowaniu . 161 8. Korekty oddanych głosów i zgłoszenia zamiaru oddania głosu . 162 9. Wznowienie posiedzenia . 162 10. Zatwierdzenie protokołu poprzedniego posiedzenia . 162 11. Akty delegowane (art. 111 ust. 2 Regulaminu) . 162 12. Środki wykonawcze (art. 112 Regulaminu) . 163 13. Składanie dokumentów . 163 14. Przesunięcia środków i decyzje budżetowe . 164 15. Ingerencja innych państw w nasze procesy demokratyczne i wyborcze (debata na aktualny temat) . 164 C 203/156 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej 28.5.2021 Środa, 27 listopada 2019 r. Spis treści Strona 16. Sytuacja w krajach sąsiedztwa wschodniego (debata) . 165 17. Sytuacja w Izraelu i Palestynie, w tym w osiedlach żydowskich (debata) .