DOCSLIB.ORG

Analyse De Mpack Et De La Bluepill (Septembre 2007)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analyse De Mpack Et De La Bluepill (Septembre 2007) 7 BRE 200 L’ACTU SÉCU 16 SEPTEM LES “UNE MENACE NOMMÉE MPACK” Le hacking devient un jeu d’enfant... SOMMAIRE DOSSIER SPÉCIAL PACK : LES ROOTKITS VIRTUELS “BLUEPILL” ARTNERS.COM MPACK et TORPIG LES VULNÉRABILITÉS DU MOIS ICEPACK LES OUTILS LIBRES .XMCOP FISHING_BAIT SHARK WWW © XMCO Partners - 2007 [1] Ce document est la propriété du cabinet XMCO Partners. Toute reproduction est strictement interdite. 7 BRE 200 L’EDITO SEPTEM Les packs spécial rentrée... Vous avez certainement vu le film tions, nous plongeons pour vous Michel Sardou et de Johnny Hal- « The Matrix » : le monde dans au cœur des menaces du moment lyday contrôlés par une backdoor lequel nous vivons ne serait pas pour les décortiquer et ainsi vous (voir l’interview de LCI de Marc réel, nous serions en fait endormis aider à vous en protéger. Behar sur notre site). pendant qu’une machine nous ferait vivre dans un monde virtuel L’Actu Secu continue d’évoluer et et utiliserait notre énergie vitale ne manquera pas de présenter pour se nourrir. des sujets d’actualité comme : l’ISO27001, la sécurité Bluetooth, Cette fiction est la toile de fond de l’Ajax ou encore les risques liés à ce 16ième ActuSécu. Fort de nos la technologie RFID… 1000 téléchargements pour son numéro consacré aux Botnets, Bonne lecture nous vous présentons pour cette rentrée 2007 les menaces qui font L’équipe XMCO vous souhaite et feront parler d’elles : MPACK, une bonne rentrée IcePack, la BluePill, Torpig, Des menaces d'ailleurs présentes Shark… dans l’actualité du mois d’août : les clients du Crédit Mutuel atta- Avec le même souci de clarté qui qués par le trojan Banker « Tor- nous anime lors de nos presta- pig » ou encore les ordinateurs de AOUT 2007 Nombre de bulletins Microsoft : 9 Nombre d’exploits dangereux : 20 Nombre de bulletins XMCO : 103 Le TOP des Menaces du Mois 1. Netsky 2. Mytob 3. Zafi 4. MPACK Dossier Spécial “PACK” PART I.................................................3 Les rootkits virtuels : “Blue Pill”..............................................14 MPACK, le premier framework d’exploitation de vulnérabilités. Présentation des nouveaux rootkits basés sur la virtualisation Dossier Spécial “PACK” PART II................................................7 Attaques et alertes majeures....................................................17 ARTNERS.COM ICEPACK, comme un goût de déjà vu. Description et analyse des attaques les plus importantes du mois. Dossier Spécial “PACK” PART III...............................................9 Outils Libres...............................................................................20 Fishing_bait : le kit de Phishing. Découvrez les outils les plus efficaces. .XMCOP Dossier Spécial “PACK” PART IV.............................................12 Shark, le générateur de cheval de Troie. WWW © XMCO Partners - 2007 [2] Ce document est la propriété du cabinet XMCO Partners. Toute reproduction est strictement interdite. PART. I : MPACK, le premier fra- DOSSIER SPECIAL “PACK” mework d’exploitation de vulné- rabilités des navigateurs... DES KITS DE HACKING A LA PORTEE DE TOUS... De plus en plus de kits destinés aux pirates en herbe fleurissent Septembre 2007 Septembre sur la toile. La commercialisation de chevaux de Troie ou de kits de Phishing n’est pourtant pas nou- SÉCU velle. En revanche l’utilisation massive de ces derniers devient peu à peu un fléau difficilement contrôlable. L’ACTU L’ACTU Cet article tentera de vous pré- senter les dernières menaces de ce type découvertes sur Internet. Nous vous expliquerons simplement les méthodes d’infection et les risques engendrés par ces outils à la mode. Nous analyserons ainsi les outils ou packs : MPACK, ICE- PACK, un kit de création de Phish- ing (Fishing_bait) ainsi qu’un générateur de cheval de Troie bap- tisé Shark. Commençons par le plus connu de tous : MPACK... XMCO | Partners Depuis quelques mois, plusieurs de packs ont été souligne l’aspect pro- développés et distribués par de véritables pirates. Ces fessionnel de la derniers ont été largement relayés par la presse, mais commercialisation de n’ont jamais été clairement défini. Certains assimilent leur outil. MPACK à un Cheval de Troie sans savoir ni connaître Pour les besoins de son fonctionnement réel. D’autres diffusent des infor- notre article, nous mations erronées sans jamais entrer dans le vif du nous sommes procu- sujet. Pourtant ces nouvelles menaces mettent en rés MPACK afin d’expliquer le fonctionnement de ce danger tous les internautes et par la même occasion dernier. l’intégrité des Systèmes d’Information des entreprises. Principe de fonctionnement Description MPACK : un succès inattendu MPACK est tristement célèbre depuis les différents La diffusion du MPACK fut un véritable succès. Les événements survenus au mois de mai 2007 sur des pirates ont utilisé différentes astuces pour arriver à serveurs web italiens. MPACK est un framework d’ex- compromettre près de 500 000 internautes en quel- ploitation de vulnérabilités web. Ce dernier est vendu ques jours. Campagnes d’email, achats de noms de par des pirates russes pour 700 dollars environ sur les domaines ressemblant à des sites légitimes ou encore forums spécialisés. publicités Google, tous les moyens furent bons pour attirer un grand nombre d’internautes victimes vers ARTNERS.COM Ce pack se compose d’un ensemble de pages PHP des pages malicieuses de MPACK. capables d’exploiter les failles de sécurité des naviga- teurs web (Internet Explorer, Mozilla, Opera, …). Dès le mois de mai 2007 et en exploitant diverses failles de type PHP, des pirates se sont infiltrés sur un .XMCOP MPACK est livré sous la forme d’une archive. Ses au- grand nombre de serveurs web Italiens (près de teurs proposent même un support d’un an, ce qui 10 000). WWW © XMCO Partners - 2007 [3] Ce document est la propriété du cabinet XMCO Partners. Toute reproduction est strictement interdite. Ces infiltrations avaient pour objectif d’insérer des 3. En fonction du navigateur client, une page php est balises HTML iframes piégées au sein du maximum alors appelée et exploite une vulnérabilité du naviga- de pages web possible : c’est la phase préliminaire de teur. la première attaque MPACK. 4. Un malware est téléchargé et exécuté à l’insu de la Ces balises iframes étaient transparentes pour les victime. internautes et avaient pour unique fonction de pointer 5. Ce malware infecte les pages web accessibles de- vers un des sites hébergeant le MPACK. puis le poste de la victime. Septembre 2007 Septembre Ainsi, dès qu’un utilisateur visitait un site infecté par ces balises iframes, celui-ci était silencieusement redirigé vers un serveur web hébergeant la page SÉCU PHP d’attaque de MPACK. Une fois sur cette page, différentes attaques visant à exploiter les failles de sécurité du navigateur de la victime sont enchaînées. L’ACTU L’ACTU Si le navigateur est vulnérable (ce qui est fort proba- ble), celui-ci se retrouve contraint de télécharger et d’exécuter un petit programme appelé downloader. Ce dernier a pour but de rechercher, sur la machine de la victime, toutes les pages HTML (.html, .htm, …) et d’y insérer la balise iframe. La boucle est alors bouclée. Nous verrons plus loin que ce downloader peut éga- lement contenir d’autres charges utiles… Contenu du pack MPACK est livrée sous la forme d’une archive contenant un en- semble de pages PHP. Mpack étant payant, la plupart DEFINITION... des versions disponibles sur In- ternet ne sont pas opérationnel- les immédiatement. En effet, Iframe : après avoir mis en place la base de données SQL (création de la Une iframe est une balise HTML permet- tant de regrouper plusieurs pages web en base avec la table user) sous-ja- une seule. Elle permet donc à un pirate çente, il faut appeler un script qui d’intégrer une page malicieuse au sein générera les tables nécessaires. d’une page légitime. La taille de cette Dans un second temps, il faut se dernière est paramétrable (1 pixel) et plonger dans le code PHP afin peut donc paraître invisible à la vue d’identifier les erreurs laissées des victimes. par les internautes qui ont publié gratuitement ce pack. La modification d’un fichier PHP Exemple : suffit pour pouvoir utiliser plei- <iframe name="" SRC= nement MPACK. "http://www.xmcopartners.com" scrol- ling="yes" height="1" width="1" FRAME- Une fois les petites modifications BORDER="yes"></iframe> apportées au code, MPACK est prêt à compromettre les visiteurs pris au piège. Scénario d’attaque ARTNERS.COM La base de données SQL Le scénario est le suivant : Etudions à présent les différentes tables utilisées par MPACK. Ces dernières sont créées par le script 1. L’internaute visite un site légitime vérolé. .XMCOP « maketable.php ». Ces tables permettent de générer 2. Une balise iframe redirige l’utilisateur vers un site des statistiques et de donner aux pirates une vision hébergeant MPACK des différentes victimes de MPACK. WWW © XMCO Partners - 2007 [4] Ce document est la propriété du cabinet XMCO Partners. Toute reproduction est strictement interdite. Dans notre cas, nous avons choisi le mot « stat » qui Les différents scripts PHP sert à dériver les autres noms des tables. Passons à présent aux composants PHP qui caracté- Voici les tables SQL : risent MPACK. -stat_fs contient les champs statid (identificateur de la victime), a2 (non défini), country (pays de la victime) Plusieurs d’entre eux (crypt.php, crypt_of.php, et count (compteur de victime) crypte.php, cryptor.php) sont utilisés afin de chiffrer, -stat_fs_all contient le champs « data » (qui définit déchiffrer ou encoder les urls. Septembre 2007 Septembre l’adresse IP de la victime) Le fichier setting.php permet de définir la configura- -stat_fs_br contient un champs « browser » qui défini- tion des connexions à la base SQL et inclue égale- ra les caractéristiques du navigateur de la victime et ment une fonction de géolocalisation à partir de l’IP SÉCU un champs count. source de la victime afin de déterminer le pays origine -stat_fs_refs contient un champs referrer (pour déter- de l’internaute.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Malware and Social Engineering Attacks
    chapter 2 Malware and Social Engineering Attacks After completing this chapter, you will be able to do the following: ● Describe the differences between a virus and a worm ● List the types of malware that conceals its appearance ● Identify different kinds of malware that is designed for profit ● Describe the types of social engineering psychological attacks ● Explain physical social engineering attacks 41 42 Chapter 2 Malware and Social Engineering Attacks Today’s Attacks and Defenses Successful software companies use a variety of strategies to outsell their competition and gain market share. These strategies may include selling their software at or below a com- petitor’s price, offering better technical support to customers, or providing customized software for clients. And if all else fails, a final strategy can be to buy out the competition through a merger or acquisition. These strategies are also being widely used by attackers who sell their attack software to others. Approximately two out of three malicious Web attacks have been developed using one of three popular attack toolkits. The toolkits are MPack (the most popular attack toolkit, which has almost half of the attacker toolkit mar- ket), NeoSploit, and ZeuS. These toolkits, which are bought and sold online through the underground attacker community, are used to create customized malware that can steal personal information, execute fraudulent financial transactions, and infect computers without the user’s knowledge. The toolkits range in price from only $40 to as much as $8,000. The developers behind these attack toolkits compete fiercely with each other. Some of their tactics include updating the toolkits to keep ahead of the latest security defenses, advertising their attack toolkits as cheaper than the competition, and provid- ing technical support to purchasers.
    [Show full text]
  • Security of Personal Identifiable Information
    https://doi.org/10.48009/2_iis_2008_634-638 SECURITY OF PERSONAL IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION Jack D. Shorter,Texas A&M University – Kingsville, [email protected] Karen A. Forcht, North Carolina A & T University, [email protected] Alicia Aldridge,Appalachian State University, [email protected] Daphyne S. Thomas, James Madison University,[email protected] Abstract impacted if Google’s merger with DoubleClick is completed? In today’s fast moving world, the use of technology has become a part of everyday life. Whether it is DoubleClick is one of the fastest growing digital using a computer to access the Internet, sending marketers, and the amount of user data that could be email, or using cell phones to contact friends and provided to them from Google would be phenomenal. family, technology is found in almost everything. At issue is whether Google can be trusted with users’ Technology provides many conveniences such as PII at its disposal. Armed with this information online banking, renewing a driver’s license, making a DoubleClick could target consumers with a method known as “retargeting.” This type of practice was consumer purchase, or conducting research. th However, using technology has its pros and cons. On one of the topics discussed at the 17 annual the positive side, conducting personal business online Conference on Computers, Freedom & Privacy in is convenient, saves time, and is economical. May 2007. This method uses ads and serves them to However, with the pluses, there are usually minuses users based on their Web surfing behaviors. [4] as well. In the case of an online consumer purchase, one may find price deals, but may discover a lack of A user uses a search engine such as Google to find a quality or poor customer care.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Exploit Kit and How Does It Work? [1]Ade Kurniawan, [2]Ahmadfitriansyah [1][2]Department of Informatics Engineering, Universal University,Batam, Indonesia
    International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Volume 118 No. 20 2018, 509-516 ISSN: 1314-3395 (on-line version) url: http://www.ijpam.eu Special Issue ijpam.eu What is Exploit Kit and How Does it Work? [1]Ade Kurniawan, [2]AhmadFitriansyah [1][2]Department of Informatics Engineering, Universal University,Batam, Indonesia Abstract— In the Year 2016 to mid-2017, the analysts have claimed those years as the years of Malware especially Ransomware. The number, spread, infection and impact of malware have caused many users, businesses, governments, and organizations to be anxious, one of the tools to spread it by using exploit kits. A popular method of mass distribution used the perpetrators of cyber criminals is using the exploit kit. Exploit kit has become more effective, cheaper and sophisticated tools to spread malware to their victims. Therefore, in this paper, we provide this research using the Network Forensic Method. The results which are done will explain the chain of events about what the exploit kit is and how the exploit kit works, including actors, campaigns, payload, and terminology involved in the spreading of malware Index Terms—Exploit Kit, Payload, Malware, Ransomware, and Chain of events. I. INTRODUCTION In our digital era, everything is connected and Network Forensics Method. Network forensics is a everyone is vulnerable. The development, part of Digital Forensic conducted with scientific dependability, and complexity of computer software methods to identify, analyse and reconstruct events have brought immediate implications for global based on digital evidence/logs from the network safety and security, especially physical objects such [14][15][16].
    [Show full text]
  • Crimeware on the Net
    Crimeware on the Net The “Behind the scenes” of the new web economy Iftach Ian Amit Director, Security Research – Finjan BlackHat Europe, Amsterdam 2008 Who Am I ? (iamit) • Iftach Ian Amit – In Hebrew it makes more sense… • Director Security Research @ Finjan • Various security consulting/integration gigs in the past – R&D – IT • A helping hand when needed… (IAF) 2 BlackHat Europe – Amsterdam 2008 Today’s Agenda • Terminology • Past vs. Present – 10,000 feet view • Business Impact • Key Characteristics – what does it look like? – Anti-Forensics techniques – Propagation methods • What is the motive (what are they looking for)? • Tying it all up – what does it look like when successful (video). • Anything in it for us to learn from? – Looking forward on extrusion testing methodologies 3 BlackHat Europe – Amsterdam 2008 Some Terminology • Crimeware – what we refer to most malware these days is actually crimeware – malware with specific goals for making $$$ for the attackers. • Attackers – not to be confused with malicious code writers, security researchers, hackers, crackers, etc… These guys are the Gordon Gecko‟s of the web security field. The buy low, and capitalize on the investment. • Smart (often mislead) guys write the crimeware and get paid to do so. 4 BlackHat Europe – Amsterdam 2008 How Do Cybercriminals Steal Business Data? Criminals’ activity in the cyberspace Federal Prosecutor: “Cybercrime Is Funding Organized Crime” 5 BlackHat Europe – Amsterdam 2008 The Business Impact Of Crimeware Criminals target sensitive business data
    [Show full text]
  • Dissecting Web Attacks
    Dissecting Web Attacks Val Smith ([email protected]) Colin Ames ([email protected]) Delchi ([email protected]) Bios Valsmith – Affiliations: • Attack Research • Metasploit • cDc – Work: • Attack Techniques Research - History • Pen Tester/ Exploit • Founder Offensive Computing developer • Speaker • Reverse Engineer - Blackhat • Malware Analyst - Defcon - Shmoocon Bios Colin Ames – Security Researcher, Attack Research – Steganography Research – Penetration Testing – Reverse Engineering – Malware Analysis The Problem THESE GUYS (For Real?) AND THESE GUYS (Who says so?) AND THESE GUYS ? WANT YOUR AND WILL USE YOUR TO GET THEM While this happens you are: I n t r o d u c t i o n Introduction • Attackers are using the web in various ways to: – Push users to their malicious sites – Gain access to computers – Steal information • They use many technologies – Java/Javascript HTML – Iframes Encoding/Obfuscation – Spam Injection Introduction • For this talk we analyzed different types of attacks – Blog Spam – Web site injection • We dissect the attacks piece by piece to analyze and show – Source code Commands – Network traffic Attack Goals – Binaries Attackers Blog Spam • Analysis process – View victim blog, locate malicious comments – Trace back all A HREFs in comments – WGET code from attacker site • Follow any links • Decode obfuscated instructions • Debug javascript – Firebug, Venkman • Decompile Java Applets – Lookup owners of domains / IPs – Reverse any exploits / binaries Blog Spam • 1st Stage of the attack – Uses comments to sites – Blogs such as Drupal & Wordpress • Comments: – Usually in response to valid post – Splice together random but legitimate phrases from sources such as wikipedia – Contain several linked words to various sites – Will be added en mass to many disparate posts – Often will have non-English embedded words such as Italian, German, Russian Shows some comments added to a legitimate post.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Chuck Norris Botnet
    Embedded Malware – An Analysis of the Chuck Norris Botnet Pavel Celeda,ˇ Radek Krejcˇ´ı, Jan Vykopal, Martin Drasarˇ Institute of Computer Science Masaryk University Brno, Czech Republic {celeda,vykopal,drasar}@ics.muni.cz, [email protected] Abstract—This paper describes a new botnet that we have new botnet threat using infected device as man-in-the-middle discovered at the beginning of December 2009. Our NetFlow- to compromise Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) connections. based network monitoring system reported an increasing The paper is organized as follows: After a short intro- amount of Telnet scanning probes. Tracing back to a source we have identified world wide infected DSL modems and home duction and related work, we describe the botnet discovery. routers. Nowadays, various vendors use Linux in this kind Then we analyse the botnet internals and how the botnet of devices. A further investigation has shown that most of behaves. We present our botnet extension to attack HTTPS deployed SoHo (small office/home office) devices use default connections. Finally, we conclude by summarizing its size passwords or an unpatched vulnerable firmware. Some devices estimation and impacts of the Chuck Norris botnet. allow a remote access via Telnet, SSH or a web interface. Linux malware exploiting weak passwords allows fast propagation II. RELATED WORK and a virtually unlimited potential for malicious activities. In comparison to a traditional desktop oriented malware, end With new electronic devices like smartphones, game decks users have almost no chance to discover a bot infection. We and all other kinds of intelligent home electronic devices, call the botnet after Chuck Norris because an early ver- malware also started to expand to these new platforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Malware Analysis Bahcesehir University Cyber Security Msc Program
    Course Syllabus Introduction Mobile Malware Industrial Systems IoT 01-Introduction CYS5120 - Malware Analysis Bahcesehir University Cyber Security Msc Program Dr. Ferhat Ozgur Catak 1 Mehmet Can Doslu 2 [email protected] [email protected] 2017-2018 Fall Dr. Ferhat Ozgur Catak 01-Introduction Course Syllabus Introduction Mobile Malware Industrial Systems IoT Table of Contents Mitigations 1 Course Syllabus 4 Industrial Systems Syllabus Scada Reference Books Scada Attacks Grading Industrial Systems Malware 2 Introduction Shodan Basic concepts Modbus Definition Stuxnet Target Systems Duqu 3 Mobile Malware 5 IoT Mobile Malware Definition InstaAgent IoT Platforms AceDeceiver IoT Applications BankBot Mirai Acnetdoor Bashlite Dr. Ferhat Ozgur Catak 01-Introduction Course Syllabus Introduction Mobile Malware Industrial Systems IoT Table of Contents Mitigations 1 Course Syllabus 4 Industrial Systems Syllabus Scada Reference Books Scada Attacks Grading Industrial Systems Malware 2 Introduction Shodan Basic concepts Modbus Definition Stuxnet Target Systems Duqu 3 Mobile Malware 5 IoT Mobile Malware Definition InstaAgent IoT Platforms AceDeceiver IoT Applications BankBot Mirai Acnetdoor Bashlite Dr. Ferhat Ozgur Catak 01-Introduction Course Syllabus Introduction Mobile Malware Industrial Systems IoT Syllabus Expected Syllabus, subject to change I Week 1: Introduction I Memory management analysis I Main concepts I Intro to CPU architecture I x86 registers I Malware: definition, aim and analysis requirements I Instruction sets I General analysis methods I Week 5: Code Analysis I Week 2: Basic Static Analysis I IDA Pro, GDB I Debuggers I Basic Static Analysis I Static analysis for Windows I Week 6: Static Analysis and Linux OS Blocking Methods I Packers I Week 3: Behaviour Analysis I Definition I Week 7: Dynamic Analysis Blocking Methods I Tools I Process I Debugger blocking I Week 4: Assembly I ...
    [Show full text]
  • The Architectural Dynamics of Encapsulated Botnet Detection (EDM)
    Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science 2(4): 1-8, 2018; Article no.AJRCOS.46652 The Architectural Dynamics of Encapsulated Botnet Detection (EDM) Maxwell Scale Uwadia Osagie1* and Amenze Joy Osagie1 1Department of Physical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Benson Idahosa University, P.M.B. 1100, GRA, Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria. Authors’ contributions This work was carried out in collaboration between both authors. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript. Article Information Editor(s): (1) Sasikumar Gurumoorthy, Professor, Department of Computer Science and Systems Engineering, Sree Vidyanikethan Engineering College, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India. Reviewers: (1) Jose Ramón Coz Fernández, University Complutense of Madrid, Spain. (2) Enrico Cambiaso, Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche (CNR), Italy. (3) Robiah binti Yusof, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia. Complete Peer review History: http://www.sdiarticle3.com/review-history/46652 Received 22 October 2018 Original Research Article Accepted 30 January 2019 Published 27 February 2019 ABSTRACT Botnet is one of the numerous attacks ravaging the networking environment. Its approach is said to be brutal and dangerous to network infrastructures as well as client systems. Since the introduction of botnet, different design methods have been employed to solve the divergent approach but the method of taking over servers and client systems is unabated. To solve this, we first identify Mpack, ICEpack and Fiesta as enhanced IRC tool. The analysis of its role in data exchange using OSI model was carried out. This further gave the needed proposal to the development of a High level architecture representing the structural mechanism and the defensive mechanism within network server so as to control the botnet trend.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTENTS in THIS ISSUE Fighting Malware and Spam
    APRIL 2009 Fighting malware and spam CONTENTS IN THIS ISSUE 2 COMMENT ROGUE TRADERS Flooding the cloud Rogue anti-malware applications have been around for several years, 3 NEWS conning and causing Ghostly goings on confusion among users as well as posing problems for anti-malware Internet fraud complaints rise vendors. Gabor Szappanos takes a look at a piece of anti-virus scamware. page 9 3 VIRUS PREVALENCE TABLE APPLE CATCHER Mario Ballano Barcena and Alfredo Pesoli take 4 TECHNICAL FEATURE a detailed look at what appears to be the fi rst real attempt to create a Mac botnet. Anti-unpacker tricks – part fi ve page 12 VB100 ON WINDOWS XP MALWARE ANALYSES VB’s anti-malware testing team put 9 Your PC is infected a bumper crop of products through their paces on Windows XP. Find out 12 The new iBotnet which products excelled and which have some more work to do. page 15 15 COMPARATIVE REVIEW Windows XP SP3 36 END NOTES & NEWS This month: anti-spam news and events; and John Levine looks at message authentication using Domain Keys Identifi ed Mail (DKIM). ISSN 1749-7027 COMMENT ‘An even better mutated variations of malware in large volume. While this strategy won’t work against all technologies solution is to be (for example it is ineffective against HIPS, advanced proactive in the heuristics, generic detection etc.), it is well worth the cloud.’ effort for its ability to evade signature detection. I was interested to fi nd out whether these explanations Luis Corrons could be verifi ed by our detection data – for example Panda Security to see for how long each threat was active.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Art Botnet-Centric Honeynet Design
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Texas A&amp;M Repository STATE OF THE ART BOTNET-CENTRIC HONEYNET DESIGN A Thesis by JOHN SYERS III Submitted to the O±ce of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial ful¯llment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May 2009 Major Subject: Computer Science STATE OF THE ART BOTNET-CENTRIC HONEYNET DESIGN A Thesis by JOHN SYERS III Submitted to the O±ce of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial ful¯llment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Approved by: Chair of Committee, Udo W. Pooch Committee Members, William M. Lively Alexander Sprintson Head of Department, Valerie E. Taylor May 2009 Major Subject: Computer Science iii ABSTRACT State of the Art Botnet-Centric Honeynet Design. (May 2009) John Syers III, B.S., University of Houston{Downtown Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Udo W. Pooch The problem of malware has escalated at a rate that security professionals and researchers have been unable to deal with. Attackers savage the information technol- ogy (IT) infrastructure of corporations and governments with impunity. Of particular signi¯cance is the rise of botnets within the past ten years. In response, honeypots and honeynets were developed to gain critical intelligence on attackers and ultimately to neutralize their threats. Unfortunately, the malware community has adapted, and strategies used in the early half of the decade have diminished signi¯cantly in their e®ectiveness. This thesis explores the design characteristics necessary to create a honeynet capable of reversing the current trend and defeating botnet countermea- sures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Malware Ecosystem
    The Malware Ecosystem Hrvoje Dogan IronPort Systems Engineer, Emerging Markets Cisco IronPort Systems, LLC Presentation_ID © 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential 1 Agenda 1. Recent Stories USAid Website Hacked Digg.com Serving Malicious Codecs Conficker/Downadup Worm Scareware Spyware 2. Threat Landscape 3. Web - #1 Threat Vector 4. A Bit of Good News 2 Presentation_ID © 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential Recent Stories 3 Presentation_ID © 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential azerbaijan.usaid.gov 1. The Azerbaijan section at the US Agency for International Development (azerbaijan.usaid.gov) became another well-known legitimate web site compromised. (usaid.gov has approx 86K visitors a month*) 2. The Website was embedded with malware and exploits serving scripts sometime around the 1st of March. 3. Upon successful exploitation a Trojan Downloader was installed on the 4 Presentation_ID user’s© 2009 Cisco Systems,computer Inc. All rights reserved. (Windows Cisco Confidential only). Multiple Malicious Redirections . The malware infection showed three malicious redirections; cs.ucsb.edu.4afad2ceace1e653.should-be.cn/jan10.cn 1 orderasia.cn/index.php 2 orderasia.cn/iepdf.php?f=old 3 . The malware then “phones home”; . fileuploader.cn/check/check.php . The malware’s phone home location is a domain that was exclusively used by the Russian Business Network (RBN) back in January, 2008. 5 Presentation_ID © 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential Digg.com Serving Malicious Codec's 1. On February 11, a surge of false stories with popular social news subject lines were created by malware writers as an attempt to bait users into clicking links which lead to malware.
    [Show full text]
  • The Decline of Exploit Kits As an Exploitation Strategy
    The Decline of Exploit Kits as an Exploitation Strategy Ma, Zicong [email protected] Abstract Exploit kit is a software kit, which normally runs on web servers. It identifies the vulnerabilities in the client machines by communicating with it through the browser, then using malicious code to exploit the vulnerability to deliver and execute malicious software on the victim’s machine. The first form of exploit kits started appearing in 2006, then it slowly became more and more popular. With the introduction of the Blackhole exploit kit, it became one of the most used cyber-criminal strategy in 2012. However, following some arrests to the dominant exploit kits’ author, the growth trend of exploit kits was successfully stopped. We analysed data on blogs and twitters from the year of 2016 and 2017 to get a better picture on the most recent trend of the exploit kits. Through several graphs and tables that we produced, we concluded that the exploit kit landscape is in a state of decline and predicts that this trend will carry on unless there is some explosion in the effectiveness of exploit kits. 1. Exploit Kits Background on Drive-by Malware There were days where you would have to click on something on the webpage to download a software onto your device. Nowadays, opening any website can put you at risk of getting malicious programs installed onto your computer because of “drive by” malwares, as suggest by its name, when you visit a website or simply “drive by” it, the malware and malicious scripts can download and execute in the background without you noticing it.
    [Show full text]