DOCSLIB.ORG

Report Card on British Columbia's Elementary Schools

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Studies in FRASER Education Policy I N S T I T U T E Report Card on British Columbia’s Elementary Schools 2018 by Peter Cowley and Stephen Easton COMPARESchoolRankings.ORG Report Card on British Columbia’s Elementary Schools 2018 By Peter Cowley and Stephen Easton Contents Introduction / 3 Elementary schools included in this report / 5 Key academic indicators of school performance / 6 Other indicators of school performance / 8 Notes / 9 Detailed school reports / 10 How does your school stack up? / 82 Appendix: Calculating the Overall rating out of 10 / 92 About the authors / 94 Publishing information / 95 Supporting the Fraser Institute / 96 Purpose, funding, & independence / 96 About the Fraser Institute / 97 Editorial Board / 98 2 Introduction The Report Card on British Columbia’s Elementary perform well or show consistent improvement are Schools 2018 (hereafter, Report Card) collects a variety of applauded. Poorly performing schools generate con- relevant, objective indicators of school performance into cern, as do those whose performance is deteriorating. one, easily accessible public document so that anyone This inevitable attention provides one more incentive can analyze and compare the performance of individual for all those connected with a school to focus on stu- schools. By doing so, the Report Card assists parents dent results. when they choose a school for their children and encour- The Report Card, however, offers more than incen- ages and assists all those seeking to improve their schools. tive: it includes a variety of indicators, each of which reports results for an aspect of school performance The Report Card helps parents choose that might be improved. School administrators who are dedicated to improvement accept the Report Card Where parents can choose among several schools for their as another source of opportunities for improvement. children, the Report Card provides a valuable tool for making a decision. Because it makes comparisons easy, Some schools do better than others it alerts parents to those nearby schools that appear to To improve a school, one must believe that improve- have more effective academic programs. Parents can also ment is achievable. This Report Card provides evidence determine whether schools of interest are improving over about what can be accomplished. It demonstrates clear- time. By first studying the Report Card, parents will be ly that, even when we take into account factors such as better prepared to ask relevant questions when they visit the students’ family background, which some believe schools under consideration and speak with the staff. dictate the degree of academic success that students will Of course, the choice of a school should not be have in school, some schools do better than others. This made solely on the basis of any one source of informa- finding confirms the results of research carried out in tion. A tour of each school of interest and an interview other countries.1 Indeed, it will come as no great sur- with the principal can be useful. Parents who already prise to experienced parents and educators that the data have a child enrolled at the school can provide another consistently suggest that what goes on in the schools point of view. And, a sound academic program should makes a difference to academic results and that some be complemented by effective programs in areas of schools make more of a difference than others. school activity not measured by the Report Card. Nevertheless, the Report Card provides a detailed pic- Comparisons are the key to improvement ture of each school that is not easily available elsewhere. By comparing a school’s latest results with those of earlier years, we can see if the school is improving. The Report Card encourages By comparing a school’s results with those of neigh- schools to improve bouring schools or of schools with similar school and student characteristics, we can identify more success- The act of publicly rating and ranking schools attracts ful schools and learn from them. Reference to overall attention and can provide motivation. Schools that provincial results places an individual school’s level of 3 4 Report Card on British Columbia’s Elementary Schools 2018 achievement in a broader context. You can contribute to the Comparisons are the key to improvement: making development of the Report Card comparisons among schools is made simpler and more meaningful by the Report Card’s indicators, ratings, The Report Card program benefits from the input of and rankings. Comparisons among schools can be made interested parties. We welcome your suggestions, com- more easily by using the Institute’s school rankings ments, and criticisms. Please contact Peter Cowley at website, <http://www.compareschoolrankings.org>. [email protected]. Elementary schools included in this report This edition of the Report Card includes two types combination of two schools—grades 1 though 5 at the of elementary schools. The majority of the schools elementary school and grades 6 and 7 at the middle (656 out of 946) enroll both grade-4 and grade-7 school—with academic performance at Type-1 schools students. An additional 290 elementary schools that in the same and other districts. do not enroll grade-7 students (hereafter referred to Of course, the staff at Type-2 schools could argue as “Type-2 schools”) are also included. The students that, since they cannot influence the effectiveness of who attend these elementary schools generally move learning outside their own school, they cannot be to a middle school or junior high school after com- held responsible for the grade-7 results of their for- pleting the highest grade (usually grade 5 or grade 6) mer students now attending a middle school. To some that the school offers. Type 2 schools are identified in extent, this may be true. However, in many cases the the detailed school reports and in the ranking table Type-2 school has been responsible for the child’s aca- with double daggers (††) immediately following each demic development for five years and it is reasonable Type 2 school’s name. to assume that effective teaching during that period The procedure for determining the indicator val- would benefit students as they move through their ues, ratings, and rankings for the two types of schools studies at middle school. Further, it is likely that the is the same with one important exception. Because administrators in districts where middle schools are Type-2 schools have no grade-7 enrollment, they do established have developed liaison programs to ensure not generate the grade-7 level provincewide test results that student progress continues uninterrupted by the that are used in seven of this Report Card’s academ- transition from elementary to middle schools. ic indicators. However, students who were enrolled Further, we cannot be certain that all the grade-4 in Type-2 schools participate in the grade-7 test sit- students at a Type-2 school moved to the same school tings—usually at a middle school—a year or two after for grade 7. In some cases, students will have two or they have left their elementary school. The Ministry more middle schools from which to choose. Some stu- of Education provides grade-7 level data required for dents may move to private schools offering a greater the calculation of the indicators grouped by the school grade range. Still others may choose to attend a Type-1 at which the students were enrolled in grade 4 rather school in a neighbouring district. However, there is no than by the school at which the students had written reason to believe that the ability to choose from a vari- the grade-7 tests. We are, therefore, able to attribute to ety of grade-7 schools will effect a particular Type-2 each Type-2 school the grade-7 level test results of the school’s results systematically. students who attended grade 4 at the school. Readers reviewing the results for Type-2 schools We believe it is reasonable to make this attribution. should bear in mind that they reflect the combined In districts where Type-2 elementary schools operate, effect of both the elementary school and the middle parents are able to compare academic performance at a schools that its students subsequently attend. 5 Key academic indicators of school performance The foundation of the Report Card is an overall rating in reading, writing, and numeracy at the grade-4 and of each school’s academic performance. We base our grade-7 levels. Overall rating on ten indicators: Fundamental to the mission of elementary schools is teaching its students the basic skills of reading, 1. average Foundation Skills Assessment2 (FSA) writing, and mathematics. These skills are essen- score in grade-4 reading; tial building blocks for life-long learning. The tests 2. average FSA score in grade-4 writing; upon which the Report Card is based are designed to 3. average FSA score in grade-4 numeracy; achieve a distribution of results reflecting the differ- 4. average FSA score in grade-7 reading; ences in students’ mastery of the skills embodied in 5. average FSA score in grade-7 writing; the curriculum. Differences among students in abili- ties, motivation, and work-habits will inevitably have 6. average FSA score in grade-7 numeracy; some impact upon the final results. There are, how- 7. the difference between male and female students ever, recognizable differences from school to school in their average FSA scores in grade-7 reading; within a district in the average results on the FSA tests. 8. the difference between male and female students There is also variation within schools in the results in their average FSA scores in grade-7 numeracy; obtained in different skills areas and at different grade 9.
Recommended publications
  • Chretien Consensus

    Chretien Consensus

    End of the CHRÉTIEN CONSENSUS? Jason Clemens Milagros Palacios Matthew Lau Niels Veldhuis Copyright ©2017 by the Fraser Institute. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. The authors of this publication have worked independently and opinions expressed by them are, therefore, their own, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Fraser Institute or its supporters, Directors, or staff. This publication in no way implies that the Fraser Institute, its Directors, or staff are in favour of, or oppose the passage of, any bill; or that they support or oppose any particular political party or candidate. Date of issue: March 2017 Printed and bound in Canada Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Data End of the Chrétien Consensus? / Jason Clemens, Matthew Lau, Milagros Palacios, and Niels Veldhuis Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-0-88975-437-9 Contents Introduction 1 Saskatchewan’s ‘Socialist’ NDP Begins the Journey to the Chrétien Consensus 3 Alberta Extends and Deepens the Chrétien Consensus 21 Prime Minister Chrétien Introduces the Chrétien Consensus to Ottawa 32 Myths of the Chrétien Consensus 45 Ontario and Alberta Move Away from the Chrétien Consensus 54 A New Liberal Government in Ottawa Rejects the Chrétien Consensus 66 Conclusions and Recommendations 77 Endnotes 79 www.fraserinstitute.org d Fraser Institute d i ii d Fraser Institute d www.fraserinstitute.org Executive Summary TheChrétien Consensus was an implicit agreement that transcended political party and geography regarding the soundness of balanced budgets, declining government debt, smaller and smarter government spending, and competi- tive taxes that emerged in the early 1990s and lasted through to roughly the mid-2000s.
  • Rebalanced and Revitalized: a Canada Strong

    Rebalanced and Revitalized: a Canada Strong

    Rebalanced and Revitalized A Canada Strong and Free Mike Harris & Preston Manning THE FRASER INSTITUTE 2006 Copyright ©2006 by The Fraser Institute. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. The authors have worked independently and opinions expressed by them are, therefore, their own, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the supporters or the trustees of The Fraser Institute. The opinions expressed in this document do not necessary represent those of the Montreal Economic Institute or the members of its board of directors. This publication in no way implies that the Montreal Economic Institute or the members of its board of directors are in favour of, or oppose the passage of, any bill. Series editor: Fred McMahon Director of Publication Production: Kristin McCahon Coordination of French publication: Martin Masse Design and typesetting: Lindsey Thomas Martin Cover design by Brian Creswick @ GoggleBox Editorial assistance provided by White Dog Creative Inc. Date of issue: June 2006 Printed and bound in Canada Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Data Harris, Mike, 945- Rebalanced and revitalized : a Canada strong and free / Mike Harris & Preston Manning Co-published by Institut économique de Montréal. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0–88975–232–X . Canada--Politics and government--2006-. 2. Government information-- Canada. 3. Political participation--Canada. 4. Federal-provincial relations-- Canada. 5. Federal government--Canada. I. Manning, Preston, 942- II. Fraser Institute (Vancouver, B.C.) III. Institut économique de Montréal IV.
  • Curriculum Vitae RONALD W. MARX

    Curriculum Vitae RONALD W. MARX

    Curriculum Vitae RONALD W. MARX CONTACT INFORMATION Office College of Education University of Arizona 1430 E. 2nd Street PO Box 210069 Tucson, AZ 85721-0069 (520) 621-9640 (office) (520) 205-0404 (mobile) DEGREES Stanford University 1978 Ph.D, Educational Psychology and Child Development California State University, Northridge 1971 M.A., School Psychology California State University, Northridge 1969 B.A. (cum laude), Psychology CERTIFICATION State of California Life Credential, Pupil Personnel Services: School Psychology Community College Teaching Credential: Psychology Province of British Columbia Licensed Psychologist (lapsed) -2- 2 PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYMENT 2017- Professor of Educational Psychology Dean Emeritus University of Arizona 2003-2017 Dean Professor of Educational Psychology Paul L. Lindsey and Kathy J. Alexander Chair in Education University of Arizona 1990-2003 Professor, Educational Studies Program, School of Education University of Michigan 1984-1990 Professor 1983-1987 Director of Graduate Programs 1979-1988 Senior Researcher, Instructional Psychology Research Group 1979-1984 Associate Professor 1975-1979 Assistant Professor Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University Burnaby, British Columbia 1987-1988 Director of Research Learner's Group, British Columbia Royal Commission on Education 1982-1983 Visiting Scholar Department of Educational Psychology, University of Arizona 1977, 1979 , 1980, 1981 (Summers) Visiting Member Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education University of British Columbia 1975 Teaching
  • Fisherman Dec 2010

    Fisherman Dec 2010

    CEP SCEP UNION W LABEL VOL. 76 NO. 2 I DECEMBER, 2011 I VANCOUVER, B.C. 2000 $1 Season’s Greetings 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 4 R E B M U N T N E N I F M F I E R E G R N G A E A S – O T O H P N A M R E H S I F SHOREWORKERS THE FISHERMAN, DECEMBER 2011 2 FISHERIES ISA tests show need for monitoring CFIA, DFO downplay any problem despite positive samples found in wild salmon the Canadian Food gered Nov. 8, when Con Kiley, the University of Bergen’s refer - Molly Kibenge, wife of Fred The joint statement by envi - Inspection Agency and acting director of aquatic health ence lab in Norway by Dr. Are Kibenge from the PEI lab, carried ronmental groups, signed by DFO last month tried for CFIA, told a telephone news Nylund, who confirmed that one out the research between August Georgia Strait Alliance, David T to slam the lid on conference “there is no evidence of the samples had tested positive 2002 and April 2003 but the Suzuki Foundation, Coastal reports of a potential virus known that ISA occurs in waters off the for the European strain of ISA. results were never published. Alliance for Aquaculture Reform as infectious salmon anemia (ISA) coast of British Columbia.” Kiley, together with Peter Molly Kibenge e-mailed Jones and the UFAWU-CAW among in Pacific salmon. But officials had He was responding to reports Wright from DFO’s reference lab Nov.
  • Canada's Regulatory Burden

    Canada's Regulatory Burden

    About the authors Canada’s Laura Jones is the Director of the Centre for Studies in Risk and Regulation at The Fraser Institute. She joined The Fraser Insti- tute in 1996 to develop the Institute’s policy Regulatory Burden on the environment. Since joining the Insti- tute, she has edited Fish or Cut Bait! The Case for Individual Transferable Quotas in the Salmon Fishery of British Columbia, Glo- How Many Regulations? bal Warming: The Science and the Politics and Safe Enough? Managing Risk and Regu- lation. Ms Jones has also published articles in Fraser Forum, The Vancouver Sun, the At What Cost? Ottawa Citizen, and the Financial Post. She is the author of Crying Wolf? Public Policy on Endangered Species in Canada and was a co- author of four editions of Environmental In- dicators for Canada and the United States, a by Laura Jones Fraser Institute Critical Issues Bulletin. She received her B.A. in Economics from Mount Holyoke College in Massachusetts, and her and Stephen Graf M.A. in Economics from Simon Fraser Uni- versity in British Columbia. Prior to joining the Institute, she taught economics at Co- quitlam College and is currently teaching Economic Issues at the British Columbia In- stitute of Technology. Stephen Graf holds a Bachelor of Busi- Contents ness Administration, with joint majors in business and economics, from Simon Fraser University (1999). He will enter his third year of study at the University of British Co- 3 Direct and indirect costs of regulation lumbia’s Faculty of Law in September 2001. Stephen participated in The Fraser Insti- tute’s Student Leaders’ Colloquium in 1998 7 What is regulation? and worked as an intern at The Fraser Insti- tute in 2000.
  • Head of School Opportunity

    Head of School Opportunity

    HEAD OF SCHOOL OPPORTUNITY WELCOMEWELCOME Founded in 1917, Vancouver Talmud Torah (VTT) is Canada’s largest elementary Jewish day school west of Toronto, serving more than 200 families and 440 students in preschool 3 through grade 7. VTT is an inclusive Jewish day school rooted in Jewish traditions, values and knowledge, and infused with the spirit of chesed and tikkun olam. VTT serves a socially, economically, religiously and academically diverse community through a robust dual-track general and Judaic studies curriculum built upon the principles of 21st century learning. Students are welcomed into a warm, supportive and innovative learning environment, rich with extra-curricular, performing arts, athletic and Jewish values-based programming. MISSION Vancouver Talmud Torah is an inclusive Jewish community day school committed to academic excellence and nurturing lifelong learners who engage the world through Jewish traditions and values. To learn more about VTT’s values, please click here. VISION Families in Greater Vancouver will recognize VTT as the premiere Jewish day school for students from a broad spectrum of Jewish practice and belief. The Jewish community in Vancouver will recognize VTT as a partner in educating Jewish students and an integral part of the fabric of Jewish life in the community. The Greater Vancouver community will recognize the active role VTT plays as a contributor to social justice in the community, across Canada, and around the world. THE OPPORTUNITY VTT presents an exceptional leadership opportunity for the next Head of School. VTT’s next leader will arrive at a particularly exciting time as the school completes the first year of its second century and prepares to appoint its first new HOS in 17 years following the planned retirement of current head, Cathy Lowenstein.
  • Tonic Water Retailers

    Tonic Water Retailers

    TONIC WATER RETAILERS ALBERTA STORM MOUNTAIN LODGE HIGHWAY 93 SOUTH BANFF AB BETTY LOU'S LIBRARY 20 LOWER LEVEL 908 17TH AVE SW CALGARY AB BRIDGELAND MARKET 1104 1 AVE NE CALGARY AB CAMBRIAN DRUG MART 9- 728 NORTHMOUNT DR. NW CALGARY AB GREEN AND NATURAL MARKET #100 10233 ELBOW DRIVE SW CALGARY AB SOBEYS STRATHCONA SQUARE #300, 555 STRATHCONA BLVD S.W. CALGARY AB SPRINGBANK CHEESE 304- 10816 McLEOD TR. SE CALGARY AB SUNNYSIDE NATURAL MARKET 10 - 338 10TH ST NW CALGARY AB TWO PENNY RESTAURANT 1213 1ST SW CALGARY AB NUTTERS CANMORE UNIT 1 - 900 RAILWAY AVE CANMORE AB RUSTICANA GROCERY 2 - 801 8 ST CANMORE AB THE SASKATOON FARM RR # 1 - 19 KM S. ON HWY #2 DeWINTON AB NATURAL ROOTS BUYING CLUB 10994 126ST EDMONTON AB RIVERSIDE GROCERY CROSSDOCK TO “PACIFIC NORTH FREIGHT” EDMONTON AB NUTTERS LETHBRIDGE #101 -920- 2ND AVE A NORTH LETHBRIDGE AB ZUCCHINI BLOSSOM MARKET & CAFE 62 3RD ST NE MEDICINE HAT AB SOBEYS OKOTOKS 201 SOUTHRIDGE DR. OKOTOKS AB NUTTERS RED DEER 20A - 5250 22ND ST RED DEER AB AMARANTH - ST ALBERT 101 RIEL DR ST ALBERT AB EDSON BUYING CLUB YELLOWHEAD COUNTY AB BRITISH COLUMBIA SAFEWAY - COQUITLAM 580 CLARKE RD COQUITLAM BC SAFEWAY - DAWSON CREEK 11200, 11216 - 8 STREET DAWSON CREEK BC SAFEWAY - FORT ST. JOHN 9123 - 100 STREET FORT ST. JOHN BC SAFEWAY - LANGLEY 6153 - 200 STREET LANGLEY BC SAFEWAY - NELSON 211 ANDERSON NELSON BC SAFEWAY - PENTICTON 801 - 1301 MAIN STREET PENTICTON BC SAVE-ON FOODS 300 - 20395 LOUGHEED HWY MAPLE RIDGE BC SAVE-ON FOODS 3510 BLANSARD ST VICTORIA BC SAVE-ON FOODS - WESTSIDE VILLAGE 100 - 172 WILSON
  • Deep Roots. Strong Communities. 2019 Regionaregionall Supply Chachainin Study

    Deep Roots. Strong Communities. 2019 Regionaregionall Supply Chachainin Study

    Deep Roots. Strong Communities. 2019 RegionaRegionall Supply ChaChainin Study COFI 2019 Regional Supply Chain Study 1 ABOUT THE STUDY The BC Council of Forest Industries (COFI) represents the majority of lumber, pulp and paper, and manufactured wood producers from across the province. Commissioned by COFI in early 2020, the 2019 Regional Supply Chain Study assesses the overarching economic and social benefits flowing from the B.C. forest industry supply chain to communities throughout the province. The study analyzed the 2019 supply chain spend and reach of 19 COFI member companies. The study was conducted by iTOTEM Technologies Ltd., an Indigenous- affiliated business based in Vancouver. 2 CONTENTS 4 Deeply Rooted in B.C.’s Communities 5 Forestry’s Economic Reach is Like No Other Industry in B.C. 6 MAP: ACTIVE SUPPLIERS SERVING B.C. FOREST INDUSTRY 7 TABLE: HIGHEST INDUSTRY SPEND ON SUPPLIERS 8 TABLE: HIGHEST NUMBER OF SUPPLIERS 9 Driving the Economy of B.C.’s Urban Centres 11 TABLE: SPEND AND NUMBER OF SUPPLIERS IN METRO VANCOUVER 12 B.C.’s Forest Industry — Anchoring Innovation and Technology Hubs 12 Urban Centres and Technology: Supplier Spotlight on FYBR Solutions 14 Forestry is Incubating Innovation in B.C.’s Manufacturing Cluster 15 Parts, Equipment and Service Providers 16 After Market Manufacturers: Supplier Spotlight on Daken Enterprises 18 Indigenous Communities Are Vital Industry Partners 19 Indigenous Partnerships Spotlight on 2019 Partnerships and Projects 20 The Future of Forestry: Technology Spotlight on the Forest Machine Connectivity Project 22 Contributing to Community Growth Through Investment 22 TABLE: COMMUNITY INVESTMENT RECIPIENTS 23 Community Investment Spotlight on the Heiltsuk Tiny Homes Project 24 Deep Roots to Support Our Future 25 More About the Study COFI 2019 Regional Supply Chain Study 3 Deeply Rooted in B.C.’s Communities The forest industry has been a cornerstone of British Columbia’s economy for over 100 years.
  • Healthy Incentives: Canadian Health Reform in an International Context

    Healthy Incentives: Canadian Health Reform in an International Context

    Healthy Incentives: Canadian Health Reform in an International Context © The Fraser Institute, 1996 © The Fraser Institute, 1996 Healthy Incentives: Canadian Health Reform in an International Context edited by William McArthur, M.D., Cynthia Ramsay and Michael Walker The Fraser Institute Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada © The Fraser Institute, 1996 Copyright © 1996 by The Fraser Institute. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embod- ied in critical articles and reviews. The authors of this book have worked independently and opinions expressed by them, therefore, are their own, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the members or the trustees of The Fraser Institute. Printed and bound in Canada. Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Main entry under title: Healthy incentives Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-88975-165-X 1. Medical care, Cost of. 2. Medical care, Cost of—Canada. 3. Medical policy. 4. Medical policy—Canada. 5. Health care reform —Canada I. Ramsay, Cynthia, 1969– II. Walker, Michael, 1945– III. McArthur, William, 1934– IV. Fraser Institute (Vancouver, B.C.) RA412.5.C2H42 1996 338.4’33621’0971 C96–910378–6 © The Fraser Institute, 1996 Table of Contents Preface ...............................vii About the authors ........................ xxi Part I: Health Care Systems in Europe and Australasia Britain’s NHS—Coping with Change............. 3 Working Class Patients and the British State: an Historical Perspective ................. 15 Lessons from Britain’s National Health Service ....... 27 What Can Europe’s Health Care Systems Tell Us About the Market’s Role? ............... 39 Sweden’s Health Care System ...............
  • Restaurant Locations Sorted by City - Updated March 2019

    Restaurant Locations Sorted by City - Updated March 2019

    Restaurant Locations sorted by city - updated March 2019 The Canadian Brewhouse and Grill E125 - 3122 Mt. Lehman Road Abbotsford V2T 0C5 Brodeur`s Bistro 3550 Mt. Lehman Rd. Abbotsford V4X2M9 Glenn Bar and Grill 36036 South Parallel Road Abbotsford V3G 2K4 Rendezvous Mt Lehman 3280 Mt Lehman Road Abbotsford V4X 2M9 Restaurant 62 106 - 2001 McCallum Rd Abbotsford V2S 3N5 S & L Kitchen and Bar 2070 Sumas Way Abbotsford V2S 2C7 The Keg 2142 West Railway Street Abbotsford V2S 2E2 Gunbarrel Pub 950 Strayhorse Road Apex V2A 8Z9 Bayside Marina & Grill 2509 Blind Bay Road Blind Bay V0E 1H1 Finz Bar and Grill 2001 Eagle Bay Road Blind Bay V0E1H1 Butchart Gardens Restaurant PO Box 4010 Brentwood Bay V8X 3X4 Brentwood Pub 849 Verdier Avenue Brentwood Bay V8M 1C5 Stem Japanese Eatery 5205 Rumble Street Burnaby V5J 2B7 Earls- Bridge Park 3850 Lougheed Highway Burnaby V5C 6N4 Earl`s Kingsway 4361 Kingsway Avenue Burnaby V5H 1Z9 Riverway Cafe 9001 Bill Fox Way Burnaby V5J 5J3 Cotto Enotecca Pizzeria 6011 Hastings Street Burnaby V5B 1R8 Hilton Vancouver Metrotown 6083 McKay Ave Burnaby V5H 2W7 Olove Greek Kitchen 5931 Hastings Street Burnaby V5B 1R7 The Gateway Casino 4331 Dominion Street Burnaby V5G 1C7 L`Artista Ristorante Italiano 3891 East Hastings Burnaby V5C 2H7 Baci`S - A Taste Of Italy 3728 EAST HASTINGS BURNABY V5C 2H5 The Keg 4510 Still Creek Ave. Burnaby V5C 0B5 Horizons 100 Centennial Way Burnaby V5A 2X9 Delta Burnaby Hotel 4331 Dominion Street Burnaby V5G 1C7 Sonora Resort & Conference 1340 Island Highway Campbell River V9W 8C9 Harbour Grill
  • Canadian STUDENT REVIEW

    Canadian STUDENT REVIEW

    Canadian STUDENT REVIEW BEWARE BOUTIQUE TAX CREDITS QUARTERLY STUDENT MAGAZINE STUDENT QUARTERLY SPRING 2021 Video Highlight: WHAT’S Essential Austrian Blog Post: INSIDE Economics: Tax reform should play crucial Student Article: Interventionism role in COVID recovery Manufacturing in Canada EDITORS Daniela Castillo, Ryan Hill LAYOUT AND DESIGN Carolina Wong PRODUCTION EDITOR Kristin McCahon PHOTO CREDITS iStock, Pexels To receive a subscription, or to write to us about articles you read in this publication, contact us at: Canadian Student Review 1770 Burrard Street, 4th Floor Vancouver, British Columbia V6J 3G7 TEL 604.688.0221 ext. 538 FAX 604.688.8539 EMAIL [email protected] Copyright © 2021, the Fraser Institute DATE OF ISSUE Spring 2021 ISSN 1707-116X (online edition) Canadian Student Review is sponsored by the Lotte & John Hecht Memorial Foundation. Canadian Student Review is published by the Fraser Institute. The views contained within are strictly those of the authors. Our mission is to improve the quality of life for Canadians, their families and future generations by studying, measuring and broadly communicating the effects of government policies, entrepreneurship and choice on their well-being. 2 FRASERINSTITUTE.ORG | CANADIAN STUDENT REVIEW Canadian STUDENT REVIEW TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 . Welcome Message 8 14 5 . Beware Boutique Tax Credits Student contributor William Dunstan explains why narrowly targeted tax credits unnecessarily complicate the tax system. 8 . Video Gallery SPRING 2021 This video from the Essential Austrian Economics series, uncovers the unintended consequences on the market of policy interventions. 9 . Manufacturing in Canada For Canada to build a strong domestic manufacturing industry, it will need to leverage its advantages to compete effectively, says student contributor Brennan Sorge.
  • The Price of Public Health Care Insurance 2020

    The Price of Public Health Care Insurance 2020

    FRASER RESEARCH BULLETIN August 2020 The Price of Public Health Care Insurance, 2020 by Milagros Palacios and Bacchus Barua SUMMARY Canadians often misunderstand the true mon Canadian family types, depending on the cost of our public health care system. This oc- type of family. curs partly because Canadians do not incur The 10 percent of Canadian families with direct expenses for their use of health care, and the lowest incomes will pay an average of about partly because Canadians cannot readily deter- $471 for public health care insurance in 2020. mine the value of their contribution to public The 10 percent of Canadian families who earn health care insurance. an average income of $65,522 will pay an aver- In 2020, preliminary estimates suggest the age of $6,627 for public health care insurance, average payment for public health care insur- and the families among the top 10 percent of ance ranges from $4,190 to $14,474 for six com- income earners in Canada will pay $39,731. fraserinstitute.org FRASER RESEARCH BULLETIN 1 The Price of Public Health Care Insurance 2020 Introduction ans cannot easily work out precisely what they The purpose of this research bulletin is to help pay to government each year for health care individual Canadians and their families better because there are many different sources of understand how much they annually contribute government revenues that may contribute to to Canada’s public health care system. funding health care, including income taxes, Employment Insurance (EI) and Canada Pension While Canadians may not be billed direct- Plan (CPP) premiums, property taxes, profit ly when they use medical services, they pay a taxes, sales taxes, taxes on the consumption of substantial amount of money for health care alcohol and tobacco, and import duties, among through the country’s tax system.