DOCSLIB.ORG

Us Taxation System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Us Taxation System US TAXATION SYSTEM Omri Yaniv International Tax Manager, PwC US Taxation System - List of Topic Basis of taxation Taxation of foreign corporations .US domestic law .US tax treaties .Types of U.S. entities .Check the box regulations Foreign tax credit US Anti-deferral Provisions: .Subpart F Rules; .Passive Foreign Investment Corporation (PFIC) Rules Transfer Pricing 2 US Taxation System - General The US taxation system is primarily a personal based taxation system. US tax residents are taxed on their worldwide income Determination of residency (under domestic law) – .Corporation - a corporation is considered a US resident if incorporated in the United States .Individual – an individual is considered a US resident if he/she is either a US citizen or meets the (i) permanent residency status test; or (ii) the substantial presence test 3 Taxation of Foreign Corporations – US Domestic Law The United States generally asserts only a limited taxing jurisdiction over foreign residents (e.g., foreign corporations). ."Foreign corporation" – a corporation incorporated under the laws of a country other than the United States. A foreign corporation pays US tax only on income that has sufficient nexus with the United States. In order to examine whether there is sufficient nexus, three variables need to be examined: .The nature and source of the foreign corporation's income, i.e., whether derived from sources within the US or whether from sources without the US; .The nature of the foreign corporation's activities, i.e., whether engaged in a "US trade or business"; and .The relation between the income derived and the US activities , i.e., whether the income is "effectively connected" with a "US trade or business" 4 Taxation of Foreign Corporations – US Domestic Law Variable I – nature and source of the income Source Rules – rules for determining the source of income for US tax purposes. In determining the source of an item of income the specific sourcing rule that governs that certain type of income must be identified, e.g.: .Royalties - sourced in the place of use of the property for which the royalties are paid .Rental Income - sourced at the location or the place of use of the leased property for which the rental income is paid .Gains from the sale of personal property – generally sourced by reference to the seller’s country of residence (several exceptions exist) 5 Taxation of Foreign Corporations – US Domestic Law Variables II & III – nature of US activities and the relation between the income and the activities .Whether the foreign corporation is engaged in a US trade or business: – No definition of the phrase in the Internal Revenue Code (case-by-case resolution based the facts and circumstances). – Fundamental distinction – regular commercial activity versus passive investment. .If the answer is positive, what portion of the income is effectively connected with the conduct of such US trade or business: – The mere existence of a US trade or business is not sufficient to subject the investment income to the normal tax rates. – The existence of a trade or business in the US does not affect the taxation of unrelated investment income 6 Taxation of Foreign Corporations – US Domestic Law Income effectively connected with a US trade or Business If the foreign corporation (i) conducts a US trade or Business, and (ii) The income derived is effectively connected with such trade or business, then the income will be taxable inthe United States ona net basis. Income not from a US Trade or Business If the foreign corporation (i) does not conduct a US trade or Business, or (ii) does conduct a US trade or business but the examined income is not effectively connected with such trade or business, then the income will be taxable inthe US onlyif considered to be sourced within the US. 7 Taxation of Foreign Corporations – US Domestic Law The operative US taxation result is dependant upon the source determination: .Income Effectively Connected with a US Trade or Business: – Subject to the provisions of any applicable treaty, a foreign corporation generally pays US income tax at the regular US rates on net income. .Income not from a US Trade or Business: – A foreign corporation is generally subject to US tax at a flat rate of 30% with respect to US-source gross income, subject to the provisions of an applicable tax treaty which may reduce tax imposed by the United States. – Such tax is usually collected by way of withholding by the US-based payer, on amounts received from sources within the US by a foreign corporation. 8 Taxation of Foreign Corporations – US Domestic Law Source Determination - Examples category of income If income is If income is not effectively connected effectively connected 1. Capital gains Net income taxed at No US tax regular corporate rate 2. Fixed or determinable Net income taxed at Gross income taxed at income (e.g., interest, regular corporate rate flat 30% rate dividend, royalties) 3. US real property Net income taxed at treated as effectively interest gains regular corporate rate connected income 4. Other income Net income taxed at treated as effectively regular corporate rate connected income 9 Taxation of Foreign Corporations – Income Tax Treaties Treatment of Business Income - General In general, the US does not tax business income of a corporation that is resident in the country of a treaty partner unless the business income is attributable to a Permanent Establishment (“PE”) of the foreign corporation located within the United States. .It is possible for a foreign corporation to be engaged in a US trade or business but not to be operating through a PE in the United States. 10 Taxation of Foreign Corporations – Income Tax Treaties Treatment of Business Income - Definition of the term PE Any fixed place of business through which a resident of one of the Contracting States engages in industrial or commercial activity – three conditions: .The existence of a place of business – Facility or other premises or, in certain instances machinery or equipment – The place of business does not necessarily have to be owned or leased. – Examples – Office, branch, factory, place of management .The place of business must be fixed – Fixed place - link between the place of business and a specific geographical point. – Fixed period of time – not for a temporary period (permanency). – Established at a distinct place with a certain degree of permanence. .The business is carried on is conducted through the fixed place of business – the enterprise must carry on its business (wholly or partly) through the premises. – A PE may exist even if carried through automatic equipment (e.g., vending machine) 11 Taxation of Foreign Corporations – Income Tax Treaties Treatment of Business Income - Definition of the term PE Status of a person acting on behalf of a non-US resident corporation in the US: .A person with the authority to conclude contracts in the name of the non- US resident corporation within the US shall be deemed to constitute a PE in the US, unless: – Such person is an independent agent of such non-US corporation; – The relevant contracts relate to such matters that even if concluded through a fixed place of business would not make the fixed place of business a PE under the treaty (e.g., purchasing of goods). .The activity of a non-US resident corporation in the US which is conducted through a broker, general commission agent or any other agent of independent status in the ordinary course of their business will not constitute a PE in the United States. – The independence has to be from both a legal and an economical perspective. – Strict supervision on the agent's activity and guidance are indication of a dependant status. – Bearing of economical risks by the agent is indication of an independent status. 12 Taxation of Foreign Corporations – Income Tax Treaties Treatment of Other Income Treaties which the US is a party to may: .modify the US domestic source rules; .Modify the taxation rules by providing for reciprocal reduction of rates for investment type income; or .Exempt certain types of income. Examples from US/Israel treaty: .Dividend – reduction of withholding tax rate to 12.5% in case of a 10% or more corporate shareholder (from 30%) .Interest – reduction of withholding tax rate to 17.5% (from 30%); 10% in the case of financial institutions .Royalties – reduction of withholding tax rate to 10%/15% (from 30%) 13 Types of entities for U.S. tax purposes There are various types of entities for U.S. federal tax purposes, under two main categories: . Separate entities for tax purposes: – C-Corporation; .Flow-Through Entities: – Partnership (general or limited- LP); – S- Corporation; – Limited Liability Company (LLC); The law poses different requirements with respect to each type of entity (e.g., Restriction on type or number of members/ shareholders). 14 Types of entities for U.S. tax purposes Flow through entities are not taxed identically. Close analysis is required before deciding which entity to use for a specific activity. The tax treatment of the different flow through entities differs in many respects, such as: .Limitation on losses deductible by owners; .Highest tax rate; .Basis for allocating income to owners; .Non-liquidating distributions to owners; .Reporting requirements and tax computations. .Tax treatment of change in entity status (e.g., “S” election). 15 Types of entities for U.S. tax purposes Basic details in regard to the taxation of different types of U.S. entities: .Partnership and LLC – not subject to tax. Owners in their separate capacity subject to tax on their distributive share of income. Partnership must have at least two owners (LLC – in some states may be owned by single member). .S-Corporation – Not subject to Federal income tax (except for certain built-in gains and passive income when present from C-Corporation tax years); .C-Corporation – Income subject to two-tier Taxation (corporate and shareholder level).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Owens: the Foreign Tax Credit
    REVIEWS THE FoREIGN TAx CREDIT. By Elizabeth A. Owens. Cambridge: The Law School of Harvard University, 1961. Pp. xxxi, 634. $20.00. THE foreign tax credit provisions of the Internal Revenue Code embody United States policy toward the taxation of the foreign source income of do- mestic taxpayers. By allowing credit for foreign income taxes paid, or con- sidered paid, by domestic corporations, citizens and residents, the United States asserts only a secondary claim to the foreign source income of such taxpayers. In other words, foreign governments are regarded as having the primary right to tax income arising from sources within their borders up to the burden im- posed by the United States. The foreign tax credit device thereby serves the dual purpose of eliminating double taxation and of maintaining tax equality between domestic taxpayers with only domestic source income and those with foreign source income. The credit system, however, does not work perfectly in all instances; the statutory provisions contained in five sections of the Code ' have been subject to considerable controversy and many unanswered questions remain. These questions of law and policy are the main concern of The Foreign Tax Credit. The scope of the work may be considered from a number of viewpoints. In the first place, it may be considered from the standpoint of how fully the prob- lems of the foreign tax credit have been developed. Second, the scope of the treatment of important collateral areas may be appraised. Third, the book may be examined in terms of the depth of its analysis of common as well as the heretofore neglected problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Foreign Tax Credit P.302 Structural Tax Options for an Outbound U.S
    Chapter 5 Foreign Tax Credit p.302 Structural tax options for an outbound U.S. enterprise in (1) foreign destination country and (2) any conduit country: 1) Branch (e.g., a disregarded entity) - current U.S. income taxation on profits & loss deduction availability in the U.S. 2) Foreign corporate subsidiary - income tax deferral of U.S. income tax & no possible U.S. loss utilization Is the entity decision controlled by (1) tax planning or (2) non-tax business considerations? 4/9/2013 (c) William P. Streng 1 Mitigating Possible Double National Level Taxation Possible double taxation exposure exists (1) since the U.S. income tax is imposed on a worldwide basis & (2) assuming foreign country income tax. Options for unilateral relief (as provided by U.S.): 1) a tax deduction for the foreign tax paid (not completely eliminating double taxation) 2) a (limited) credit for the foreign tax paid (primarily used by U.S.); limited to offsetting U.S. tax on taxpayer’s foreign income. 3) exemption under a territorial system (only 4/9/2013source country taxation)(c) William P. Strengand not in U.S. 2 Bilateral (i.e., Income Tax Treaty) Relief p.306 Double tax relief accomplished under a U.S. bilateral income tax treaty. See U.S. Model, Article 23 (2006). - possible shifting of the primary income tax liability from source location to residence jurisdiction. - but, a U.S. income tax treaty does include a “savings clause” - enabling the continuing worldwide tax jurisdiction of U.S. citizens, residents or corporations. 4/9/2013 (c) William P.
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Department of Revenue Regulations Title 86 Part 100 Section 2197 FOREIGN TAX CREDIT
    Illinois Department of Revenue Regulations Title 86 Part 100 Section 2197 FOREIGN TAX CREDIT (IITA SECTION 601 (b)(3)) TITLE 86: REVENUE CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE PART 100 Income Tax Section 100.2197 Foreign Tax Credit (IITA Section 601(b)(3)) a) IITA Section 601(b)(3) provides that the aggregate amount of tax which is imposed upon or measured by income and which is paid by a resident for a taxable year to another state or states on income which is also subject to the tax imposed by IITA Section 201(a) and (b) shall be credited against the tax imposed by IITA Section 201(a) and (b) otherwise due under the IITA for that taxable year. (IITA Section 601(b)(3)) b) Definitions applicable to this Section. 1) Tax qualifying for the credit. A tax qualifies for the credit only if it is imposed upon or measured by income and is paid by an Illinois resident to another state on income which is also subject to Illinois income tax. A) A tax "imposed upon or measured by income" shall mean an income tax or tax on profits imposed by a state and deductible under IRC section 164(a)(3). The term shall not include penalties or interest imposed with respect to the tax. B) A tax is "paid by an Illinois resident" to another state "on income which is also subject to Illinois income tax" only to the extent the income included in the tax base of the other state is also included in base income computed under IITA Section 203 during a period in which the taxpayer is an Illinois resident.
    [Show full text]
  • The Notion of Tax and the Elimination of International Double Taxation Or Double Non-Taxation”
    IFA 2016 MADRID CONGRESS “The notion of tax and the elimination of international double taxation or double non-taxation” Luxembourg national report Branch reporters: Chiara Bardini*, Sandra Fernandes** Summary and conclusions The concept of tax under Luxembourg domestic law is based on the basic distinction between compulsory levies that qualify as taxes (“impôts”) and other compulsory levies, such as fees (“taxes”). In general, the term tax can be defined as a compulsory monetary levy imposed by public authorities on the taxpayers in order to mainly raise revenue for which nothing is received in return. In Luxembourg, taxes can only be raised by the Luxembourg State and the municipalities in accordance with the principles of legality, equality and annuality. The Luxembourg tax system relies on the basic distinction between direct and indirect taxes. The Luxembourg direct taxes are levied on items of income and of capital. The main Luxembourg income taxes are the individual income tax, the corporate income tax and the municipal business tax. The net wealth tax, the real estate tax and the subscription tax are the most important Luxembourg taxes levied on items of capital. The Luxembourg notion of “tax” is crucial for the purpose of granting the domestic unilateral foreign tax credit, of applying the domestic participation exemption regime. As a rule, a foreign levy only qualifies for the purpose of such domestic provisions provided that such foreign levy is an income tax and that its main features are comparable to the Luxembourg income tax (i.e. a national income tax imposed on a similar taxable base.
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Implications of Foreign Direct Investment in U.S. Farmland
    Division of Agricultural Sciences U~IVERSITY OF C,\LIFOfu~IA 1_University ofCalifornia, Berkeley. ~ept. ofagricultural and resource economicsJ . ~orkirli\ Paper No, CO9J Working Paper No. 88 TAX IHPLICATIONS OF FOREIGN DlRECT INVESTNEl'I"T IN U. S. FARNLAND by Gordon C. Rausser, Andrew Schmitz, and Rowley Warner AUG 7 1980 California Agricultural Experiment Station Giannini Foundation cf Agricultural Economics .July 1980 TAX IMPLICATIONS OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN U. S. FARMLAND Gordon C. Rausser, Andrew Schmitz, and Rowley Warner* Gordon C. Rausser is professor and chairman and Andrew Schmitz is a professor in the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Berkelely; Rowley Warner is a Certified Public Accountant with Frederiksen and Company, San Francisco, California. Foreign direct investment in U. S. farmland has become a controversial subject. Several states have passed legislation which limits or prohibits nonresident aliens from purchasing farmland. At the national level, Congress requested the General Accounting Office to determine how much of U. S. farmland is cont- rolled by foreigners. The fact that there is opposition to ownership of farmland by non-U. S. residents is interesting, especially since the Uni ted States once encouraged such ownership. In 1791 Alexander Hamilton said: "Instead of being viewed as a riyal (foreign investment) ought to be considered as a most valued auxiliary, conducing to put in motion a greater quality of production labor, a greater portion 2. of useful enterprise, than could exist without.· l The press has publicized many of the larger farmland transactions often giving the impres- sion that the alien land-purchase phenomenon has reached crisis proportions.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Changes in Federal Income Tax Credits for Foreign Oil and Gas Payments John L
    Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 12 | Issue 1 1980 Proposed Changes in Federal Income Tax Credits for Foreign Oil and Gas Payments John L. Kramer Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation John L. Kramer, Proposed Changes in Federal Income Tax Credits for Foreign Oil and Gas Payments, 12 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 97 (1980) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol12/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Volume 12, Number 1, Winter 1980 Proposed Changes in Federal Income Tax Credits for Foreign Oil and Gas Payments by John L. Kramer* I. INTRODUCTION Q ECTION 901(a) OF the Internal Revenue Code" permits a taxpayer to claim a tax credit for income, war profits, and excess profits taxes paid or accrued to foreign countries or United States possessions. Pay- ments made to a foreign government in the form of a royalty, or a sepa- rate charge for a service or a benefit, can only be claimed as a deduction in determining the taxpayer's taxable income.2 The foreign tax credit per- mits a U.S. taxpayer to pay a net U.S. tax liability on his overseas activi- ties equal to the difference between his gross U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Tax Credits
    September–October 2008 Foreign Tax Credits By James A. Riedy The Evolving Technical Taxpayer and Voluntary Payment Rules here are three basic questions under Code Sec. 901 when addressing the treatment of a Tforeign levy: 1. Is the foreign levy an income tax? 2. Who is legally liable for the foreign income tax under foreign law? 3. Did the taxpayer pay more income tax than re- quired under foreign law? For years, the debate in the foreign tax credit area was usually over whether a foreign tax was an income tax. Putting aside the enactment of the fl at tax in Mexico1 and the cash deposit tax in Mexico,2 recently there have not been many interesting foreign levies to discuss. On the other hand, recent changes relat- ing to the technical taxpayer rule and the voluntary payment rule have exposed taxpayers to new chal- lenges. Set forth below is (1) a summary of the Code Sec. 901 voluntary payment rule, and (2) a recap of three developments relating to that rule that impact the technical taxpayer rule. Voluntary Payment Rule Under the voluntary payment or noncompulsory pay- ment rule, an amount of foreign income tax paid to a foreign government is not treated as an income tax for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes.3 Since such a pay- ment is not viewed as an income tax, no foreign tax James A. Riedy is a Partner in the Tax credit is allowed for the payment, although a deduc- Department of McDermott, Will & tion may be obtained for the payment.
    [Show full text]
  • The U.S. As Tax Haven? Aiding Developing Countries by Revoking the Revenue Rule
    The U.S. as Tax Haven? Aiding Developing Countries by Revoking the Revenue Rule Samuel D. Brunson* Abstract Over the years, many OECD countries, including the United States, have identified tax havens as a significant problem, and have acted to limit the ability of their taxpayers to use tax havens to reduce their taxes. The United States has implemented tax regimes, including subpart F and the passive foreign investment company rules, and disclosure regimes, such as the recently-enacted FATCA rules, to prevent U.S. taxpayers from taking advantage of tax haven jurisdictions. But the intersection of a number of U.S. tax rules, it turns out, makes the United States an attractive place for foreigners to invest—and hide—their money. Principal among these is the revenue rule, an eighteenth-century common law rule that prevents the United States from recognizing and enforcing foreign tax judgments. As a result, if a foreign taxpayer hides money in the United States and fails to pay taxes at home, her government has no recourse to satisfy the tax debt with the taxpayer’s U.S. assets. Such hidden money disparately impacts developing countries by reducing their ability to finance government through developing tax infrastructure, and instead forcing them to remain dependent on foreign aid. The revenue rule stands in stark contrast to the general default rule that U.S. courts will enforce foreign final judgments. But the revenue rule is not grounded in any compelling policy considerations. Moreover, to the extent that the U.S. revokes the revenue rule, not only will the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Owners of Foreign Corporations Face New Hurdles
    FEATURE: INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE By Carl A. Merino & James Murray U.S. Owners of Foreign Corporations Face New Hurdles The innocent found GILTI he Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) had a toward balancing U.S. and foreign tax considerations. As dramatic impact on U.S. owners of closely held the examples below illustrate, planning options depend T foreign corporations. TCJA overhauled many greatly on a taxpayer’s circumstances. For example, some international provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, options that may work for a U.S. citizen or resident living but few areas saw as many changes as the controlled for- in the United States may not be viable for a U.S. citizen eign corporation (CFC) rules. These changes were part living abroad who’s a tax resident of another country. of a broader constellation of provisions targeted at U.S. There’s no “one size fits all” approach that will work for multinational corporations that were intended to reduce everyone. incentives for U.S. companies to shift earnings overseas without putting U.S. companies doing business abroad Overview of CFC Rules at a competitive disadvantage. These provisions gener- U.S. shareholder and CFC status. A foreign corpo- ally operate to force the taxable repatriation of earnings ration is a CFC if it’s owned more than 50 percent (by from foreign subsidiaries (whether or not such earnings vote or value) by “U.S. shareholders.”1 A U.S. person is are actually distributed), but at reduced tax rates. a U.S. shareholder with respect to a CFC if he owns at U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Foreign Tax Credit, 00
    Corporate Foreign Tax Credit, 00 Data Release or 2002, corporations filing a U.S. tax return ending between July 2002 and June 2003. These claimed $42.4 billion in foreign tax credits. The returns were selected after administrative processing F foreign tax credit enabled these corporations but prior to any amendments or audit examination. to reduce their U.S. tax liability by 34.9 percent, The 2002 corporation income tax return sample in- from $121.5 billion to $79.1 billion. In percentage cluded approximately 138,000 returns sampled from terms, this represents the largest share of foreign tax over 5.3 million active corporate returns filed for this credits claimed against U.S. taxes since 1990 [1]. period. The corporate tax return forms included in Additional credits, including the general business this sample were Forms 1120, 1120-L, 1120-F, 1120- credit and the U.S. possessions tax credit, further PC, and 1120-REIT. reduced total U.S. tax to $70.3 billion. The foreign tax credit is provided under section The 4,767 corporations claiming foreign tax 901 of the Internal Revenue Code. Corporations re- credits for 2002 earned $343.9 billion of worldwide port the foreign income and taxes related to the credit taxable income and paid $121.5 billion in world- on Form 1118, Computation of Foreign Tax Credit-- wide income taxes. Of these amounts, 46.8 percent Corporations, filed with their income tax returns. ($160.9 million) of the income and 34.1 percent The statistics in this data release are based on infor- ($41.5 million) of the taxes were derived from for- mation reported on Forms 1118 and related corporate eign-sources.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Tax Alert the International Tax Provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
    International Tax | 6 November 2017 United States Tax Alert The international tax provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act On November 2, 2017, Kevin Brady (R-TX), Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, unveiled his opening bid on comprehensive tax reform - the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, H.R. 1 (the "Bill"). With respect to the International rules, the Bill would: • Enact a 100% deduction for dividends received from 10% or greater owned foreign subsidiaries after 2017, and tax (at up to 5% or 12%) foreign earnings that were still deferred as of those subsidiaries' last tax years ending before 2018 • Tax on a current basis half of a US shareholder's controlled foreign corporations’ (CFCs') "foreign high return amounts," attributable to CFC tax years beginning after 2017 • Cap interest deductions, in tax years beginning after 2017, by reference to the lesser of: o 30% of adjusted taxable income, or o 110% of financial reporting group net interest expense multiplied by the ratio of US EBITDA to group EBITDA. • Enact a excise tax and impose a 20% excise tax on amounts paid or incurred after 2018 by a domestic corporation to foreign corporate members of the payor's financial reporting group Background Congressional leaders and the Administration hope to enact the Bill before the 2018 election; ideally, before the end of December. Together with the Joint Committee on Taxation’s description of the Bill (the “JCT Description”), and the Ways and Means Committee’s section-by-section summary, there now are over 100 pages of statutory language to replace the three-paragraph description of “territorial taxation of global American companies” and “stopping corporations from shipping jobs and capital overseas” that appeared in October’s “Unified Framework” for tax reform.
    [Show full text]
  • IRS Tax Tips on Foreign Earned Income
    IRS Tax Tips on Foreign Earned Income If you are living and working abroad you may be entitled to the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion. Here are five important facts from the IRS about the exclusion: 1. The Foreign Earned Income Exclusion United States Citizens and resident aliens who live and work abroad may be able to exclude all or part of their foreign salary or wages from their income when filing their U.S. federal tax return. They may also qualify to exclude compensation for their personal services or certain foreign housing costs. 2. The General Rules To qualify for the foreign earned income exclusion, a U.S. citizen or resident alien must have a tax home in a foreign country and income received for working in a foreign country, otherwise known as foreign earned income. The taxpayer must also meet one of two tests: the bona fide residence test or the physical presence test. 3. The Exclusion Amount The foreign earned income exclusion is adjusted annually for inflation. For 2012, the maximum exclusion is up to $95,100 per qualifying person. See IRS Foreign Earned Income Exclusion for more detailed information. 4. Claiming the Exclusion The foreign earned income exclusion and the foreign housing exclusion or deductions are claimed using Form 2555, Foreign Earned Income, which should be attached to the taxpayer’s Form 1040. A shorter Form 2555-EZ, Foreign Earned Income Exclusion, is available to certain taxpayers claiming only the foreign income exclusion. 5. Taking Other Credits or Deductions Once the foreign earned income exclusion is chosen, a foreign tax credit or deduction for taxes cannot be claimed on the excluded income.
    [Show full text]