DOCSLIB.ORG

~©~~Bulletin No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
~©~~Bulletin No International Council of Scientific Unions ~©~~bulletin No. 122JULY1996 Meeting of the SCAR Executive Committee, Siena, Italy, 16-20 September 1995 p 1 Antarctic Protected Areas: Annexes to the Measures adopted at the XIXth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting, Seoul, Korea, 8-19 May 1995 p 6 Published by the SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON ANTARCTIC RESEARCH at the Scott Polar Research Institute, Cambridge, England INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC UNIONS SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON ANT ARCTIC RESEARCH SCAR BULLETIN No 122, July 1996 Meeting of the SCAR Executive Committee Siena, Italy, 16-20 September 1995 Present: Professor AC Rocha-Campos, President; Profes­ The Group had also submitted a recommendation to sor Z Dong, Professor PG Quilty, ProfessorO Orheim, the Executive that SCAR should encourage the Joint Vice-Presidents; Professor K Birkenmajer, Secretary; Global Ocean Flux Study (JGOFS) and Southern Ocean - Dr R Schlich, Chairman of the Finance Committee; JGOFS to continue the study of C02 flux in the Southern Professor A Karlqvist, Chairman of CO MNAP; Dr PD Ocean. This recommendation was adopted for passing to Clarkson, Executive Secretary. the Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research (SCOR) Dr RM Laws, Past-President, was unable to attend. (see page 5). The Executive Committee was welcomed to Siena by 2.2 SCAR Programme Office Professor CA Ricci of the University of Siena, who had The Group of Specialists also reported that the SCAR kindly undertaken to organize the meeting. The President Global Change Programme Office had been established in expressed the gratitude of the Executive to Professor Ricci the Antarctic Cooperative Research Centre at the Univer­ for enabling the Committee to meet in the Accademia sity of Tasmania in Hobart. The appointed Programme Fisiocritica in Siena and for making available the facilities Coordinator had been forced to withdraw from the ap­ of the Department of Earth Sciences. pointment on account of technical difficulties obtaining a work permit. I D Goodwin had since been appointed and 1. Adoption of the Agenda was now undertaking the duties of the post. The draft agenda and timetable were adopted, with the 2.3 Relations with START, JGBP and WCRP addition of Agenda Item 4.3. The Group of Specialists continued to maintain links with. 2. Global Change and the Antarctic the System for Analysis, Research and Training (START), the International Geosphere-B iosphere Programme (IGBP) 2. I Group of Specialists and the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP). It The Executive recalled that the Group of Specialists on was noted that GLOCHANT Planning Group 2 was hold­ Global Change and the Antarctic (GLOCHANT) had held ing a joint meeting with the Past Global Changes (PAGES) its third meeting in Tokyo during April 1995. The report programme ofIGBPto discuss developments and plans for of the meeting had not yet been received but the Convenor future ice-core drilling in the Antarctic. and I F Allison had communicated the outline of a draft initiative proposed at the meeting. The Group proposes to 3. Antarctic data establish a Task Team that will develop a programme 3.1 SCAR-COMNAP ad hoc Planning Group on investigating Antarctic Sea-ice Processes, Ecosystems Antarctic Data Management and Climate (ASPECT). The intention is to design the Following XXIII SCAR, invitations had been issued si­ programme to close the gaps that were identified to exist multaneously by SCAR to National Committees and by in both physical and biological studies across the broader the Council of Managers ofNational Antarctic Programmes scale sea-ice environment between the Southern Ocean - (COMNAP) to Managers of National Antarctic Pro­ Joint Global Ocean Flux Study (SO-JGOFS), Southern grammes for proposals to host an Antarctic Master Direc­ Ocean - Global Ocean Ecosystems Dynamics Research tory (AMD) and to identify National Antarctic Data Cen­ (SO-GLOBEC) and Coastal and Shelf - Ecology of the tres (NADCs). One offer had been received to host the Antarctic Sea-Ice Zone (CS-EASlZ) programmes. The AMD and, after due consideration of the proposal, the programme should also strengthen the links between SCAR Planning Group had recommended to the SCAR and and these other programmes. The Executive encouraged COMNAP Executive Committees that the New Zealand the Group of Specialists to prepare a detailed science and proposal from the International Centre for Antarctic Infor­ implementation plan while taking note of the decision at mation and Research (ICAIR) in Christchurch should be XXIIJ. It is hoped that a final version will be available for accepted. Once the funding for the AMD by a consortium consideration by the Delegates at XXIV SCAR. of New Zealand, France, Italy and the United States, had SCAR BULLETIN NO. 122 been satisfactorily agreed the two Executive Committees 4. COMNAP and SCALOP confmned acceptance of the ICAIR proposal. Many, but not all, member countries had now identified their NADCs 4.1 SCALOP Workshop to the Planning Group. The Executive Secretary gave a brief report of the SCALOP It was reported that the ad hoc Planning Group consid­ Air Transport Networks Workshop held in Washington ered that its task had now been completed. The Planning DC, USA, during April 1995 and tabled a copy of his Group envisaged one more meeting, at XXlV SCAR, to Chairman's report of Working Group I on Air Support for recommend closure of the Group. Major Science Programs. Under the guidance of Dr DH 3.2 Antarctic Master Directory (AMD) Bromwich, Chairman of the SCAR Working Group on Physics and Chemistry of the Atmosphere, a recommenda­ A Memorandum of Understanding had been drafted by the tion had been developed to encourage operators to ensure SCAR-COMNAP ad hoc Planning Group for joint signa­ that in-flight weather reports were appropriately archived ture by ICAIR, SCAR and COMNAP. After some minor to increase the areal cover of opportunistic meteorological revisions, the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) data in the Antarctic. was signed by all three parties in July 1995 and the Antarctic Data Directory System (ADDS) was put into 4.2 SCAR-COMNAP Environmental Monitoring effect at ICAIR. The Executive expressed its thanks to Workshops ICAIR and the members of the funding consortium for The second circular for the first of the two SCAR-COMN AP offering to undertake this essential function. Environmental Monitoring Workshops was tabled for A condition of the MOU, that was inserted at a late information. The Workshop will be held in Oslo, Norway, stage, was a statement of the proposed method of operation during October 1995. It is expected that the report of this of the AMO Steering Committee. A preliminary statement workshop will form the basis for the agenda of the second was provided by ICAIR to the SCAR Executive, outlining workshop to be held in College Station, Texas, USA, the proposed modus operandi. This was accepted by the during March 1996. These workshops will develop advice Executive. The proposal that SCAR should be represented on environmental monitoring to be presented by SCAR by Mr A Clarke, co-chairman for SCAR of the ad hoc and COMNAP to XX! Antarctic Treaty Consultative Planning Group, was also accepted and the financial Meeting (A TCM) during 1997. commitment agreed. The Steering Committee is expected 4.3 SCALOP Sub-group to meet annually at the beginning of the Antarctic field season when representatives of the organizations forming The SCALOP Sub-group on Human Resources Manage­ the consortium may be expected to be passing through ment will be chaired by Dr RB Heywood. A joint meeting Christchurch, New Zealand, en route for Antarctica. with the SCAR Working Group on Human Biology and Tne meeting expressed concern that not all National Medicine will be held in conjunction with XXIV SCAR. Committees had identified their NADCs; the Executive 5. Groups of Specialists Secretary was asked to remind National Committees of their obligations to ensure the success of the AMO and to 5. I Environmental Affairs and Conservation request that the information should be sent directly to (GOSEAC) ICAIR. The Executive welcomed the Report of the GOSEAC VII The Executive also reviewed a proposal from ICAIR to Meeting held in Christchurch, New Zealand during June establish a SCAR Home Page on the World Wide Web. 1995. Some suggestions were made to clarify the text in This would provide essential information about SCAR some parts and it was noted that the draft checklists for that would be accessible to interested parties world-wide. some common activities were lacking introductions. These It was agreed that this was an essential service for SCAR were to be examined by the relevant SCAR Working but that it should start in a modest way and would need to Groups for comment before acceptance by GOSEAC and be carefully monitored. The Executive Secretary was recommendation to SCAR. Members agreed on the im­ asked to prepare a proposal forthe Executive to review and portance of the GOSEAC report for SCAR to frame to obtain a costing from ICAIR for the service. responses to the Antarctic Treaty requests for advice on An additional proposal from ICAIR to establish a specific scientific matters. The progress of the Manage­ secure, electronic communications network for the SCAR ment Plan Handbook for Antarctic Specially Protected Executive was also discussed. A Karlqvist advised that, Areas (ASPAs) was noted and the concern of GOSEAC based on his experience of the Antarctic Managers Elec­ that some future ASPAs may include some Historic Sites tronic Network (AMEN), this was probably unnecessary and Monuments (HSMs) that are not a matter for SCAR. for such a small group. However, it was recognized that it The Executive advised that the Handbook should simply would have value, particularly if it could be extended to mention that an ASPA may include an HSM and that include all National Committees and, ideally, Associate SCAR should request guidance on this point at XX A TCM.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Antarctic Primer
    Antarctic Primer By Nigel Sitwell, Tom Ritchie & Gary Miller By Nigel Sitwell, Tom Ritchie & Gary Miller Designed by: Olivia Young, Aurora Expeditions October 2018 Cover image © I.Tortosa Morgan Suite 12, Level 2 35 Buckingham Street Surry Hills, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia To anyone who goes to the Antarctic, there is a tremendous appeal, an unparalleled combination of grandeur, beauty, vastness, loneliness, and malevolence —all of which sound terribly melodramatic — but which truly convey the actual feeling of Antarctica. Where else in the world are all of these descriptions really true? —Captain T.L.M. Sunter, ‘The Antarctic Century Newsletter ANTARCTIC PRIMER 2018 | 3 CONTENTS I. CONSERVING ANTARCTICA Guidance for Visitors to the Antarctic Antarctica’s Historic Heritage South Georgia Biosecurity II. THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT Antarctica The Southern Ocean The Continent Climate Atmospheric Phenomena The Ozone Hole Climate Change Sea Ice The Antarctic Ice Cap Icebergs A Short Glossary of Ice Terms III. THE BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT Life in Antarctica Adapting to the Cold The Kingdom of Krill IV. THE WILDLIFE Antarctic Squids Antarctic Fishes Antarctic Birds Antarctic Seals Antarctic Whales 4 AURORA EXPEDITIONS | Pioneering expedition travel to the heart of nature. CONTENTS V. EXPLORERS AND SCIENTISTS The Exploration of Antarctica The Antarctic Treaty VI. PLACES YOU MAY VISIT South Shetland Islands Antarctic Peninsula Weddell Sea South Orkney Islands South Georgia The Falkland Islands South Sandwich Islands The Historic Ross Sea Sector Commonwealth Bay VII. FURTHER READING VIII. WILDLIFE CHECKLISTS ANTARCTIC PRIMER 2018 | 5 Adélie penguins in the Antarctic Peninsula I. CONSERVING ANTARCTICA Antarctica is the largest wilderness area on earth, a place that must be preserved in its present, virtually pristine state.
    [Show full text]
  • Thirty Years of Marine Debris in the Southern Ocean Annual
    Environment International 136 (2020) 105460 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Environment International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/envint Thirty years of marine debris in the Southern Ocean: Annual surveys of two island shores in the Scotia Sea T ⁎ Claire M. Waludaa, , Iain J. Stanilanda, Michael J. Dunna, Sally E. Thorpea, Emily Grillyb, Mari Whitelawa, Kevin A. Hughesa a British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK b Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources, 181 Macquarie Street, Hobart 7000, Tasmania, Australia ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Handling Editor: Adrian Covaci We report on three decades of repeat surveys of beached marine debris at two locations in the Scotia Sea, in the Keywords: Southwest Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean. Between October 1989 and March 2019 10,112 items of Marine debris beached debris were recovered from Main Bay, Bird Island, South Georgia in the northern Scotia Sea. The total Plastic mass of items (data from 1996 onwards) was 101 kg. Plastic was the most commonly recovered item (97.5% by Scotia Sea number; 89% by mass) with the remainder made up of fabric, glass, metal, paper and rubber. Mean mass per − − Antarctic item was 0.01 kg and the rate of accumulation was 100 items km 1 month 1. Analyses showed an increase in South Georgia the number of debris items recovered (5.7 per year) but a decline in mean mass per item, suggesting a trend South Orkney towards more, smaller items of debris at Bird Island. At Signy Island, South Orkney Islands, located in the southern Scotia Sea and within the Antarctic Treaty area, debris items were collected from three beaches, during the austral summer only, between 1991 and 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 78/Tuesday, April 23, 2019/Rules
    Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2019 / Rules and Regulations 16791 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require Agricultural commodities, Pesticides SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The any special considerations under and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978, as Executive Order 12898, entitled requirements. amended (‘‘ACA’’) (16 U.S.C. 2401, et ‘‘Federal Actions to Address Dated: April 12, 2019. seq.) implements the Protocol on Environmental Justice in Minority Environmental Protection to the Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., Populations and Low-Income Antarctic Treaty (‘‘the Protocol’’). Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, Director, Office of Pesticide Programs. Annex V contains provisions for the 1994). Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is protection of specially designated areas Since tolerances and exemptions that amended as follows: specially managed areas and historic are established on the basis of a petition sites and monuments. Section 2405 of under FFDCA section 408(d), such as PART 180—[AMENDED] title 16 of the ACA directs the Director the tolerance exemption in this action, of the National Science Foundation to ■ do not require the issuance of a 1. The authority citation for part 180 issue such regulations as are necessary proposed rule, the requirements of the continues to read as follows: and appropriate to implement Annex V Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. to the Protocol. et seq.) do not apply. ■ 2. Add § 180.1365 to subpart D to read The Antarctic Treaty Parties, which This action directly regulates growers, as follows: includes the United States, periodically food processors, food handlers, and food adopt measures to establish, consolidate retailers, not States or tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • 1- 7555-01 NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Notice of Permit Applications Received Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/28/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-24522, and on FDsys.gov 7555-01 NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Notice of Permit Applications Received Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978 AGENCY: National Science Foundation ACTION: Notice of Permit Applications Received under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978, P.L. 95-541. SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish a notice of permit applications received to conduct activities regulated under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. NSF has published regulations under the Antarctic Conservation Act at Title 45 Part 670 of the Code of Federal Regulations. This is the required notice of permit applications received. DATES: Interested parties are invited to submit written data, comments, or views with respect to this permit application by [INSERT 30 DAYS FROM DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. This application may be inspected by interested parties at the Permit Office, address below. ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Permit Office, Room 755, Division of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Li Ling Hamady, ACA Permit Officer, at the above address or [email protected] or (703) 292-7149. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Science Foundation, as directed by the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978 (Public Law 95-541), as amended by the Antarctic Science, Tourism and Conservation Act of 1996, has developed regulations for the establishment of a permit system for various activities in Antarctica and designation of certain animals and certain geographic areas a requiring special protection.
    [Show full text]
  • The Antarctic Treaty
    ! ! ! ! ! ! The Antarctic Treaty ! ! ! ! Measures adopted at the Thirty-ninth Consultative Meeting held at Santiago, Chile 23 May – 1 June 2016 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty November 2017! Cm 9542 © Crown copyright 2017 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at Treaty Section, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, King Charles Street, London, SW1A 2AH ISBN 978-1-5286-0126-9 CCS1117441642 11/17 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty!s Stationery Office MEASURES ADOPTED AT THE THIRTY-NINTH ANTARCTIC TREATY CONSULTATIVE MEETING Santiago, Chile 23 May – 1 June 2016 The Measures1 adopted at the Thirty-ninth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting are reproduced below from the Final Report of the Meeting. In accordance with Article IX, paragraph 4, of the Antarctic Treaty, the Measures adopted at Consultative Meetings become effective upon approval by all Contracting Parties whose representatives were entitled to participate in the meeting at which they were adopted (i.e. all the Consultative Parties). The full text of the Final Report of the Meeting, including the Decisions and Resolutions adopted at that Meeting and colour copies of the maps found in this command paper, is available on the website of the Antarctic Treaty Secretariat at www.ats.aq/documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Antarctic Treaty Handbook
    Annex Proposed Renumbering of Antarctic Protected Areas Existing SPA’s Existing Site Proposed Year Annex V No. New Site Management Plan No. Adopted ‘Taylor Rookery 1 101 1992 Rookery Islands 2 102 1992 Ardery Island and Odbert Island 3 103 1992 Sabrina Island 4 104 Beaufort Island 5 105 Cape Crozier [redesignated as SSSI no.4] - - Cape Hallet 7 106 Dion Islands 8 107 Green Island 9 108 Byers Peninsula [redesignated as SSSI no. 6] - - Cape Shireff [redesignated as SSSI no. 32] - - Fildes Peninsula [redesignated as SSSI no.5] - - Moe Island 13 109 1995 Lynch Island 14 110 Southern Powell Island 15 111 1995 Coppermine Peninsula 16 112 Litchfield Island 17 113 North Coronation Island 18 114 Lagotellerie Island 19 115 New College Valley 20 116 1992 Avian Island (was SSSI no. 30) 21 117 ‘Cryptogram Ridge’ 22 118 Forlidas and Davis Valley Ponds 23 119 Pointe-Geologic Archipelago 24 120 1995 Cape Royds 1 121 Arrival Heights 2 122 Barwick Valley 3 123 Cape Crozier (was SPA no. 6) 4 124 Fildes Peninsula (was SPA no. 12) 5 125 Byers Peninsula (was SPA no. 10) 6 126 Haswell Island 7 127 Western Shore of Admiralty Bay 8 128 Rothera Point 9 129 Caughley Beach 10 116 1995 ‘Tramway Ridge’ 11 130 Canada Glacier 12 131 Potter Peninsula 13 132 Existing SPA’s Existing Site Proposed Year Annex V No. New Site Management Plan No. Adopted Harmony Point 14 133 Cierva Point 15 134 North-east Bailey Peninsula 16 135 Clark Peninsula 17 136 North-west White Island 18 137 Linnaeus Terrace 19 138 Biscoe Point 20 139 Parts of Deception Island 21 140 ‘Yukidori Valley’ 22 141 Svarthmaren 23 142 Summit of Mount Melbourne 24 118 ‘Marine Plain’ 25 143 Chile Bay 26 144 Port Foster 27 145 South Bay 28 146 Ablation Point 29 147 Avian Island [redesignated as SPA no.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 218/Monday, November 14, 2005
    69098 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 218 / Monday, November 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations * * * * * unless authorized by permit as well as hereby designated as Antarctic Specially [FR Doc. 05–22466 Filed 11–10–05; 8:45 am] the ACA’s blanket prohibition on Protected Areas (ASPA). The Antarctic BILLING CODE 6560–50–P damaging, removing or destroying a Conservation Act of 1978, as amended, Historic Site or Monument. No public prohibits, unless authorized by a permit, comment is needed the addition of these any person from entering or engaging in NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION areas or sites merely implements activities within an ASPA. Detailed measures adopted by the Treaty Parties maps and descriptions of the sites and 45 CFR Part 670 at various ATCM meetings. complete management plans can be Finally, these amendments correct obtained from the National Science Conservation of Antarctic Animals and typographical errors in the names and Foundation, Office of Polar Programs, Plants numerical listings of several specially National Science Foundation, Room protected areas previously published in AGENCY: National Science Foundation. 755, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, § 670.29. Virginia 22230. ACTION: Direct final rule. Determinations ASPA 101 Taylor Rookery, Mac. SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Antarctic NSF has determined, under the Robertson Land, East Antarctica Conservation Act of 1978, The National ASPA 102 Rookery Islands, Holme criteria set forth in Executive Order Science Foundation (NSF) is amending Bay, Mac. Robertson Land, East 12866, that this rule is not a significant its regulations to designate additional Antarctica regulatory action requiring review by Antarctic Specially Protected Areas ASPA 103 Ardery Island and Odbert the Office of Management and Budget.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Map of the South Orkney Islands (1:150 000 Scale)
    46°10'W 46° 45°50' 45°40' 45°30' 45°20' 45°10' 45°W 44°50' 44°40' 44°30' 44°20'W 60°30'S 60°30'S 12 1 Scale: 1:150 000 15 5 21 kilometres 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 10 10 5 0 2.5 5 1 miles 1 1:150 000 Scale 3 10 2 1 5 5 10 2 C O 2 Geological Map of the South Larsen Islands R O 1 60°35' 60°35' N 28 20 A 40 T I O Orkney Islands 2 2 N Saddle Island 3 3 6 I 42 37 A S 20 L 1 40 5 10 A Monroe Island 3 N BAS GEOMAP 2 Series, Sheet 3, Edition 1 2 (3) Triassic 2 30 D 1 1 10 1 43 38 1 40 2 2 55 37 50 5 Weddell Islands Geological interpretation and map compilation by M.J. Flowerdew, T.R. Riley and C.E. Haselwimmer. Geological cross sections compiled by 30 3 80 Rayner Point 63 3 5 5 15 22 30 M.J. Flowerdew and C.E. Haselwimmer. Data preparation, digital cartography, design, and layout by C.E. Haselwimmer. Geological mapping 34 1 10 10 2 and digital map production was undertaken as part of the BAS Environmental Change and Evolution (ECE) programme. 3 10 50 35 5 1 2 Gibbon Bay Base map data for coastlines, rock outcrops, and ice shelves from the Antarctic Digital Database. The Antarctic Digital Database is copyright 10 40 5 15 © 1993-2006 Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices Physico-Chemical
    http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/ Research Commons at the University of Waikato Copyright Statement: The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). The thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: Any use you make of these documents or images must be for research or private study purposes only, and you may not make them available to any other person. Authors control the copyright of their thesis. You will recognise the author’s right to be identified as the author of the thesis, and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate. You will obtain the author’s permission before publishing any material from the thesis. An Investigation of Microbial Communities Across Two Extreme Geothermal Gradients on Mt. Erebus, Victoria Land, Antarctica A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master’s Degree of Science at The University of Waikato by Emily Smith Year of submission 2021 Abstract The geothermal fumaroles present on Mt. Erebus, Antarctica, are home to numerous unique and possibly endemic bacteria. The isolated nature of Mt. Erebus provides an opportunity to closely examine how geothermal physico-chemistry drives microbial community composition and structure. This study aimed at determining the effect of physico-chemical drivers on microbial community composition and structure along extreme thermal and geochemical gradients at two sites on Mt. Erebus: Tramway Ridge and Western Crater. Microbial community structure and physico-chemical soil characteristics were assessed via metabarcoding (16S rRNA) and geochemistry (temperature, pH, total carbon (TC), total nitrogen (TN) and ICP-MS elemental analysis along a thermal gradient 10 °C–64 °C), which also defined a geochemical gradient.
    [Show full text]
  • Part II Partie II
    Vol. 137, No. 25 Vol. 137, no 25 du Part II Partie II OTTAWA, WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 3, 2003 OTTAWA, LE MERCREDI 3 DÉCEMBRE 2003 Statutory Instruments 2003 Textes réglementaires 2003 SOR/2003-363 to 384 and SI/2003-176 to 184 DORS/2003-363 à 384 et TR/2003-176 à 184 Pages 2830 to 2972 Pages 2830 à 2972 NOTICE TO READERS AVIS AU LECTEUR The Canada Gazette Part II is published under authority of the Statutory La Gazette du Canada Partie II est publiée en vertu de la Loi sur les textes Instruments Act on January 1, 2003, and at least every second Wednesday réglementaires le 1 janvier 2003, et au moins tous les deux mercredis par la thereafter. suite. Part II of the Canada Gazette contains all ‘‘regulations’’ as defined in the La Partie II de la Gazette du Canada est le recueil des « règlements » Statutory Instruments Act and certain other classes of statutory instruments définis comme tels dans la loi précitée et de certaines autres catégories de and documents required to be published therein. However, certain regulations textes réglementaires et de documents qu’il est prescrit d’y publier. and classes of regulations are exempted from publication by section 15 of the Cependant, certains règlements et catégories de règlements sont soustraits à la Statutory Instruments Regulations made pursuant to section 20 of the publication par l’article 15 du Règlement sur les textes réglementaires, établi Statutory Instruments Act. en vertu de l’article 20 de la Loi sur les textes réglementaires. Each regulation or statutory instrument published in this number may Il est possible d’obtenir un tiré à part de tout règlement ou de tout texte be obtained as a separate reprint from Canadian Government Publishing, réglementaire publié dans le présent numéro en s’adressant aux Éditions du Communication Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • (ASPA) No. 121 CAPE ROYDS, ROSS ISLAND
    Measure 2 (2014) Annex Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area (ASPA) No. 121 CAPE ROYDS, ROSS ISLAND Introduction Cape Royds lies at the western extremity of Ross Island, McMurdo Sound, at 166°09'56"E, 77°33'20"S. Approximate area: 0.66 km2. The primary reasons for designation are on the grounds that the Area supports the most southerly established Adélie penguin (Pygoscelis adeliae) colony known, for which there exists a long time series of population data that is of unique and outstanding scientific value. In addition, the Area has important terrestrial and freshwater ecological values, including the most southerly observation of snow algae, the type locality for original descriptions of a number of species of algae, and the unusual presence of a form of Dissolved Organic Matter that is almost entirely microbially-derived. The Area was originally designated as Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) No. 1 in Recommendation VIII-4 (1975) after a proposal by the United States of America. The SSSI designation was extended through Recommendation X-6 (1979), Recommendation XII-5 (1983), Resolution 7 (1995) and Measure 2 (2000). A revision was adopted through Recommendation XIII-9 (1985). The site was renamed and renumbered as Antarctic Specially Protected Area (ASPA) No 121 by Decision 1 (2002). A revised management plan was adopted through Measure 1 (2002), and then through Measure 5 (2009) when the size of the marine component was reduced. The Area is situated within Environment P – Ross and Ronne-Filchner based on the Environmental Domains Analysis for Antarctica and within Region 9 - South Victoria Land based on the Antarctic Conservation Biogeographic Regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesozoic Tectonic Evolution of the South Orkney Microcontinent, Scotia Arc, Antarctica
    Geol. Mag. 134 (3), 1997, pp. 383–401. Copyright © 1997 Cambridge University Press 383 Mesozoic tectonic evolution of the South Orkney Microcontinent, Scotia arc, Antarctica R.A. J. TROUW*, C. W.PASSCHIER†, L. S.A. SIMÕES‡, R. R.ANDREIS* & C. M.VALERIANO§ * Departamento de Geologia, I.GEO, UFRJ, 21910-900,Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil † Institut für Geowissenschaften, Gutenberg Universität, 55099 Mainz, Germany ‡ Departamento de Geologia, UNESP, 13506-900,Rio Claro, SP, Brazil § Departamento de Geologia, UERJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil (Received 6 June 1996; accepted 13 January 1997) Abstract – The South Orkney Islands are the exposed part of a continental fragment on the southern limb of the Scotia arc. The islands are to a large extent composed of metapelites and metagreywackes of probable Triassic sedimentary age. Deformation related to an accretionary wedge setting, with associated meta- morphism from anchizone to the greenschist facies, are of Jurassic age (176–200 Ma). On Powell Island, in the centre of the archipelago, five phases of deformation are recognized. The first three, associated with the main metamorphism, are tentatively correlated with early Jurassic subduction along the Pacific margin of Gondwana. D4 is a phase of middle to late Jurassic crustal extension associated with uplift. This extension phase may be related to opening of the Rocas Verdes basin in southern Chile, associated with the breakup of Gondwanaland. Upper Jurassic conglomerates cover the metamorphic rocks unconformably. D5 is a phase of brittle extensional faulting probably associated with Cenozoic opening of the Powell basin west of the archipelago, and with development of the Scotia arc.
    [Show full text]