Algorithms Course Notes Binomial Heaps

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Algorithms Course Notes Binomial Heaps Algorithms Course Notes Binomial Heaps Ian Parberry∗ Spring 2003 Priority Queue Implementations • Bk consists of two copies of Bk−1. The root of one is the leftmost child of the other. • Binary heap (classic version) • Binomial heap (faster union) • Fibonacci heap (faster amortized) Bk Priority Queue Operations Bk−1 • makenull: make an empty priority queue Bk−1 • union: combine two of them • insert: insert a new element • min: return the smallest • deletemin: delete and return the smallest • decreasenode: decrease value in a node • deletenode: delete a node Running Times Examples The following figures are worst-case for binary and binomial heaps, amortized for Fibonacci heaps. Binary Binomial Fibonacci Operation Heap Heap Heap B0 B1 B2 makenull O(1) O(1) O(1) union O(n) O(log n) O(1) insert O(log n) O(log n) O(1) min O(1) O(log n) O(1) deletemin O(log n) O(log n) O(log n) decreasenode O(log n) O(log n) O(1) deletenode O(log n) O(log n) O(log n) B3 Binomial Trees A binomial tree Bk is defined recursively: • B0 is a single node ∗Copyright c Ian Parberry, 1992–2003. 1 Example B4 . B0 B1 B2 B k−2 B k−1 Proof by induction (pretty obvious). Corollary: the maximum degree of an n-node bino- mial tree is log n. Binomial Heaps Facts About Binomial Trees A binomial heap is a linked list of binomial trees The binomial tree Bk has: with the following properties: k 1. 2 nodes 1. The binomial trees are linked in increasing order 2. heightk of size. k i ≤ i ≤ k 2. There is at most one binomial tree of each size. 3. i nodes at depth for all 0 3. Each binomial tree has the heap structure: the valueineachnodeis≤ the values in its children. Proof: By induction on k. The base case is trivial (B0 is a single node). For the inductive step the key Binomial heap properties: facts are: • The root of each binomial tree contains the smallest element in that tree. 1. Bk consists of two copies of Bk−1,andsoby k−1 k−1 • There can be at most log n + 1 binomial trees the induction hypothesis, Bk has 2 +2 in a binomial heap with n nodes. That’s be- nodes. cause binomial trees only come in sizes that are 2. The maximum height of a node in Bk is one powers of 2, and n has log n +1bits. more than the maximum height of a node in the left-hand copy of Bk−1, which by the induction hypothesis is k − 1. Makenull 3. Let D(k, i) be the number of nodes at depth i in Bk. Then, An empty heap consists of an empty list. D k, i D k − ,i D k − ,i− Time O(1). ( )=( 1 )+( 1 1) k − 1 k − 1 = + Union i i − 1 k . = i • This is the hard one. • It’s used in all the other operations. Another Binomial Tree Property • In fact it makes all of the other operations triv- ial. • The root of Bk has degree k, which is the highest We’ll get back to it later. • O n degree in the tree, and Bk looks like this: The running time will be (log ). 2 Insert 2. Now we have something that looks like a binary heap except that we may have two trees of any given size. So we fix it by combining trees of 1. Make a single-node binomial heap containing duplicate size. the new value. 2. Union that with the other binomial heap. Step 1 can be done in O(log n)time.Buthowdowe Time O(1) for Step 1, O(log n) for Step 2. do step 2? First, how do we combine two binomial trees of the Min and Deletemin same size? It’s easy: make one root point to the other. Which one? The root with the larger value should point to the root with the smaller value. 1. Search the list of binomial trees for the one with smallest root m.Returnm.(Fortheminopera- Combining trees may make more duplicates. For ex- tion, stop here.) Remove the tree T containing ample, if we have trees of sizes 8,8,16 we can combine m from the binomial heap. Call the resulting the two trees of size 8 to get another tree of size 16. binomial heap H. 2. Delete the node containing m from T .Makea We want to avoid doing multiple passes through the binomial heap out of the children of the root by tree list. simply reversing the order of its children. Call this new binomial heap H. Perform a single pass along the tree list, combining 3. Union together H and H. any pair of trees of the same size into a new tree. The catch is that this may lead to three trees of the Time O(log n) for each step. same size. For example: Decreasenode Sizes 881616 Same as in regular heaps: repeatedly swap the value with its parent until it reaches a place where it is large than its parent. O n Time (log ). Combine two 8s to Deletenode get a 16 16 16 16 1. Replace the value in the node with −∞ and do a decreasenode. 2. Do a deletemin. Time O(1) for step 1, O(log n) for Step 2. Luckily there can be most three. Intuition: it’s just like binary addition: you only Now for Union need a single carry bit (in our case, “carry tree”). Since a binomial heap has O(log n) binomial trees in We put this off earlier. Two steps: its tree list, this operation takes O(log n)time. 1. Merge together the two lists of trees in order of The textbook CLRS makes a big deal out of this. size. Don’t get lost in the details. 3 Fibonacci Heaps Fibonacci heaps are just like binomial heaps except: • The trees don’t have to be binomial trees. • The tree list doesn’t have to be sorted in order of size. • There may be more than one tree of any partic- ular size. • There is an external pointer to the root with the smallest value. The main idea is that you don’t try to tidy up the data structure until deletemin or deletenode oper- ations are performed. This gives better amortized performance of the nondeleting operations. Unfortunately, the algorithm is not practical: it is mainly of theoretical interest. Easy Operations • makenull: make an empty list with a null min- pointer. • insert: make a new single-node tree and insert it into the tree list. If it is smaller than the min- imum element, adjust the min-pointer to point to it. • min: follow the min-pointer and return the value stored at that node. • union: concatenate the two lists. Make the min pointer point to the smallest of the two minima. Difficult Operations • deletemin • decreasenode • deletenode 4.
Recommended publications
  • Advanced Data Structures
    Advanced Data Structures PETER BRASS City College of New York CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521880374 © Peter Brass 2008 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provision of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published in print format 2008 ISBN-13 978-0-511-43685-7 eBook (EBL) ISBN-13 978-0-521-88037-4 hardback Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of urls for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. Contents Preface page xi 1 Elementary Structures 1 1.1 Stack 1 1.2 Queue 8 1.3 Double-Ended Queue 16 1.4 Dynamical Allocation of Nodes 16 1.5 Shadow Copies of Array-Based Structures 18 2 Search Trees 23 2.1 Two Models of Search Trees 23 2.2 General Properties and Transformations 26 2.3 Height of a Search Tree 29 2.4 Basic Find, Insert, and Delete 31 2.5ReturningfromLeaftoRoot35 2.6 Dealing with Nonunique Keys 37 2.7 Queries for the Keys in an Interval 38 2.8 Building Optimal Search Trees 40 2.9 Converting Trees into Lists 47 2.10
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Algorithms and Data Structures
    Introduction to Algorithms and Data Structures Markus Bläser Saarland University Draft—Thursday 22, 2015 and forever Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Binary search . .1 1.2 Machine model . .3 1.3 Asymptotic growth of functions . .5 1.4 Running time analysis . .7 1.4.1 On foot . .7 1.4.2 By solving recurrences . .8 2 Sorting 11 2.1 Selection-sort . 11 2.2 Merge sort . 13 3 More sorting procedures 16 3.1 Heap sort . 16 3.1.1 Heaps . 16 3.1.2 Establishing the Heap property . 18 3.1.3 Building a heap from scratch . 19 3.1.4 Heap sort . 20 3.2 Quick sort . 21 4 Selection problems 23 4.1 Lower bounds . 23 4.1.1 Sorting . 25 4.1.2 Minimum selection . 27 4.2 Upper bounds for selecting the median . 27 5 Elementary data structures 30 5.1 Stacks . 30 5.2 Queues . 31 5.3 Linked lists . 33 6 Binary search trees 36 6.1 Searching . 38 6.2 Minimum and maximum . 39 6.3 Successor and predecessor . 39 6.4 Insertion and deletion . 40 i ii CONTENTS 7 AVL trees 44 7.1 Bounds on the height . 45 7.2 Restoring the AVL tree property . 46 7.2.1 Rotations . 46 7.2.2 Insertion . 46 7.2.3 Deletion . 49 8 Binomial Heaps 52 8.1 Binomial trees . 52 8.2 Binomial heaps . 54 8.3 Operations . 55 8.3.1 Make heap . 55 8.3.2 Minimum . 55 8.3.3 Union . 56 8.3.4 Insert .
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 6 — February 9, 2017 1 Wrapping up on Hashing
    CS 224: Advanced Algorithms Spring 2017 Lecture 6 | February 9, 2017 Prof. Jelani Nelson Scribe: Albert Chalom 1 Wrapping up on hashing Recall from las lecture that we showed that when using hashing with chaining of n items into m C log n bins where m = Θ(n) and hash function h :[ut] ! m that if h is from log log n wise family, then no C log n linked list has size > log log n . 1.1 Using two hash functions Azar, Broder, Karlin, and Upfal '99 [1] then used two hash functions h; g :[u] ! [m] that are fully random. Then ball i is inserted in the least loaded of the 2 bins h(i); g(i), and ties are broken randomly. log log n Theorem: Max load is ≤ log 2 + O(1) with high probability. When using d instead of 2 hash log log n functions we get max load ≤ log d + O(1) with high probability. n 1.2 Breaking n into d slots n V¨ocking '03 [2] then considered breaking our n buckets into d slots, and having d hash functions n h1; h2; :::; hd that hash into their corresponding slot of size d . Then insert(i), loads i in the least loaded of the h(i) bins, and breaks tie by putting i in the left most bin. log log n This improves the performance to Max Load ≤ where 1:618 = φ2 < φ3::: ≤ 2. dφd 1.3 Survey: Mitzenmacher, Richa, Sitaraman [3] Idea: Let Bi denote the number of bins with ≥ i balls.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Structures Binary Trees and Their Balances Heaps Tries B-Trees
    Data Structures Tries Separated chains ≡ just linked lists for each bucket. P [one list of size exactly l] = s(1=m)l(1 − 1=m)n−l. Since this is a Note: Strange structure due to finals topics. Will improve later. Compressing dictionary structure in a tree. General tries can grow l P based on the dictionary, and quite fast. Long paths are inefficient, binomial distribution, easily E[chain length] = (lP [len = l]) = α. Binary trees and their balances so we define compressed tries, which are tries with no non-splitting Expected maximum list length vertices. Initialization O(Σl) for uncompressed tries, O(l + Σ) for compressed (we are only making one initialization of a vertex { the X s j AVL trees P [max len(j) ≥ j) ≤ P [len(i) ≥ j] ≤ m (1=m) last one). i j i Vertices contain -1,0,+1 { difference of balances between the left and T:Assuming all l-length sequences come with uniform probability and we have a sampling of size n, E[c − trie size] = log d. j−1 the right subtree. Balance is just the maximum depth of the subtree. k Q (s − k) P = k=0 (1=m)j−1 ≤ s(s=m)j−1=j!: Analysis: prove by induction that for depth k, there are between Fk P:qd ≡ probability trie has depth d. E[c − triesize] = d d(qd − j! k P and 2 vertices in every tree. Since balance only shifts by 1, it's pretty qd+1) = d qd. simple. Calculate opposite event { trie is within depth d − 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter C4: Heaps and Binomial / Fibonacci Heaps
    Chapter C4: Heaps and Binomial / Fibonacci Heaps C4.1 Heaps A heap is the standard implementation of a priority queue. A min-heap stores values in nodes of a tree such that heap-order property: for each node, its value is smaller than or equal to its children’s So the minimum is on top. (A max-heap can be defined similarly.) The standard heap uses a binary tree. Specifically, it uses a complete binary tree, which we define here to be a binary tree where each level except the last is full, and in the last level nodes are added left to right. Here is an example: 7 24 19 25 56 68 40 29 31 58 Now, any binary tree can be stored in an array using level numbering. The root is in cell 0, cells 1 and cells 2 are for its children, cells 3 through 6 are for its grandchildren, and so on. Note that this means a nice formula: if a node is in cell x,thenitschildren are in 2x+1 and 2x+2. Such storage can be (very) wasteful for a general binary tree; but the definition of complete binary tree means the standard heap is stored in consecutive cells of the array. C4.2 Heap Operations The idea for insertion is to: Add as last leaf, then bubble up value until heap-order property re-established. Insert(v) add v as next leaf while v<parent(v) { swapElements(v,parent(v)) v=parent(v) } One uses a “hole” to reduce data movement. Here is an example of inserting the value 12: 7 7 24 19 12 19 ) 25 56 68 40 25 24 68 40 29 31 58 12 29 31 58 56 The idea for extractMin is to: Replace with value from last leaf, delete last leaf, and bubble down value until heap-order property re-established.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Notes of CSCI5610 Advanced Data Structures
    Lecture Notes of CSCI5610 Advanced Data Structures Yufei Tao Department of Computer Science and Engineering Chinese University of Hong Kong July 17, 2020 Contents 1 Course Overview and Computation Models 4 2 The Binary Search Tree and the 2-3 Tree 7 2.1 The binary search tree . .7 2.2 The 2-3 tree . .9 2.3 Remarks . 13 3 Structures for Intervals 15 3.1 The interval tree . 15 3.2 The segment tree . 17 3.3 Remarks . 18 4 Structures for Points 20 4.1 The kd-tree . 20 4.2 A bootstrapping lemma . 22 4.3 The priority search tree . 24 4.4 The range tree . 27 4.5 Another range tree with better query time . 29 4.6 Pointer-machine structures . 30 4.7 Remarks . 31 5 Logarithmic Method and Global Rebuilding 33 5.1 Amortized update cost . 33 5.2 Decomposable problems . 34 5.3 The logarithmic method . 34 5.4 Fully dynamic kd-trees with global rebuilding . 37 5.5 Remarks . 39 6 Weight Balancing 41 6.1 BB[α]-trees . 41 6.2 Insertion . 42 6.3 Deletion . 42 6.4 Amortized analysis . 42 6.5 Dynamization with weight balancing . 43 6.6 Remarks . 44 1 CONTENTS 2 7 Partial Persistence 47 7.1 The potential method . 47 7.2 Partially persistent BST . 48 7.3 General pointer-machine structures . 52 7.4 Remarks . 52 8 Dynamic Perfect Hashing 54 8.1 Two random graph results . 54 8.2 Cuckoo hashing . 55 8.3 Analysis . 58 8.4 Remarks . 59 9 Binomial and Fibonacci Heaps 61 9.1 The binomial heap .
    [Show full text]
  • Problem Set 2 1 Lazy Binomial Heaps (100 Pts)
    ICS 621: Analysis of Algorithms Fall 2019 Problem Set 2 Prof. Nodari Sitchinava Due: Friday, September 20, 2019 at the start of class You may discuss the problems with your classmates, however you must write up the solutions on your own and list the names of every person with whom you discussed each problem. 1 Lazy Binomial Heaps (100 pts) Being lazy is nothing to be proud of, but occasionally it can improve the overall execution. In this exercise, we will see how delaying the work of the Union operation in the binomial heap can improve the runtime of several operations of the binomial heap. Delete and Decrease-Key operations in the lazy binomial heap will remain unchanged. To implement the new Union we will store the list of roots as a circular doubly-linked list. That is, every node in the linked list has two pointers left and right, including the head and the tail of the list, such that head:left = tail and tail:right = head: We will also maintain the number of elements stored in the heap as a field Q:n (accessible in O(1) time). Consider the following description of Union(Q1;Q2). It simply appends the root list of Q2 to the right of the root list of Q1: function Union(Q1, Q2) if Q1:head = NIL return Q2 else if Q2:head 6= NIL tail1 Q1:head:left; tail2 Q2:head:left . Pointers to the tails of Q1 and Q2 Q2:head:left tail1; tail1:right Q2:head . Link head of Q2 to the right of the tail of Q1 Q1:head:left tail2 ; tail2:right Q1:head .
    [Show full text]
  • Part C: Data Structures Wayne Goddard, School of Computing, Clemson University, 2019
    Part C: Data Structures Wayne Goddard, School of Computing, Clemson University, 2019 Data Structures 1 C1.1 Basic Collections . 1 C1.2 Stacks and Queues . 1 C1.3 Dictionary . 2 C1.4 Priority Queue . 2 Skip Lists 3 C2.1 Levels . 3 C2.2 Implementation of Insertion . 3 Binary Search Trees 5 C3.1 Binary Search Trees . 5 C3.2 Insertion and Deletion in BST . 5 C3.3 Rotations . 6 C3.4 AVL Trees . 6 Heaps and Binomial / Fibonacci Heaps 9 C4.1 Heaps . 9 C4.2 Heap Operations . 9 C4.3 Binomial Heaps . 11 C4.4 Decrease-Key and Fibonacci Heaps . 12 Hash Tables 14 C5.1 Buckets and Hash Functions . 14 C5.2 Collision Resolution . 14 C5.3 Rehashing . 15 C5.4 Other Applications of Hashing . 16 Disjoint Set Data Structure 17 C6.1 Disjoint Forests . 17 C6.2 Pointer Jumping . 18 Chapter C1: Data Structures An ADT or abstract data type defines a way of interacting with data: it specifies only how the ADT can be used and says nothing about the implementation of the structure. An ADT is conceptually more abstract than a Java interface specification or C++ list of class member function prototypes, and should be expressed in some formal language (such as mathematics). A data structure is a way of storing data that implements certain operations. When choosing a data structure for your ADT, you might consider many issues such as whether the data is static or dynamic, whether the deletion operation is important, whether the data is ordered, etc. C1.1 Basic Collections There are three basic collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Binomal Heaps and Queues Node
    EECS 311: Data Structure and Data Management Lecture 21, 22 Binomial Queues Binomial Queues & Heaps Reading: Chapter 6 (except 6.4–6.7); Chap- binomial tree structure: ter 11, Sections 2 and 4. • n is power of 2. • n = 1: binomial tree is a single Binomal Heaps and Queues node. • n =2i two 2i−1 node binomial trees, binary heaps based queues may be improv- make one a child of root of other. able. Example: 1. perform some operations faster? • One node trees: 2. binomial queue 2 . 9 • O(log n) merge. • Two node trees: 3. redundant binomial queue 2 5 • O(1) insert 9 7 • Θ(log n) delete-min, reduce-key. • Four node trees: 4. Fibonacci heaps 2 1 • O(1) insert, reduce-key 9 5 6 3 • O(log n) delete-min 7 8 • Dijkstra’s shortest paths + fi- conacci heap ⇒ Θ(n log n + m). • Eight node tree: Binomial Heaps 1 Def: a binomial heaps is a tree that satis- 6 3 2 fies 8 9 5 heap order: key at node is smaller than keys of children. 7 1 Def: a binomial queue is 1. make k into single-node queue Q′. ′ • a list of binomial heaps. 2. merge Q and Q . • for each i, at most one heap of size 2i. Runtime: merge = Θ(log n) Algorithm: delete-min Algorithm: binomial heap merge Input: Q Input: H1 and H2, two n node binomial i heaps. 1. find heap with min key ⇒ Hi, size 2 ′ • Make tree with greater root-key child of 2. remove heap Hi ⇒ Q root of other tree.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 Today's Goals • Mergeable Heaps – Review Binary Heaps
    ToDay’s&Goals& • MerGeable&Heaps& – Review&Binary&Heaps& – LinkeD2lists& – Binomial&Trees& – Binomial&Heaps& • ReD2Black& h<p://recursivelyrecursive.wordpress.com/& – Prove&balance& Heaps&O’&Fun& – Look&at&insert&/&Delete& CS&140&HMC&2&Jim&Boerkoel& Binary&heap&representaPons& ExtractMax& 16&&&14&&&10&&&8&&&&&7&&&&&&9&&&&&3&&&&&2&&&&&4&&&&&1& Return&anD&remove&the&larGest&element&in&the&set& 1&&&2&&&&3&&&&4&&&&5&&&&6&&&&7&&&&8&&&&9&&&&10& 16& 16& 14& 10& 14& 10& 8& 7& 9& 3& 8& 7& 9& 3& 2& 4& 1& 2& 4& 1& ExtractMax& ExtractMax& Return&anD&remove&the&larGest&element&in&the&set& Return&anD&remove&the&larGest&element&in&the&set& ?& 1& Heapify- 14& 10& 14& 10& 8& 7& 9& 3& 8& 7& 9& 3& 2& 4& 1& 2& 4& ExtractMax& ExtractMax& Return&anD&remove&the&larGest&element&in&the&set& Return&anD&remove&the&larGest&element&in&the&set& 14& Heapify- 8& 10& 4& 7& 9& 3& 2& 1& MerGeable&Heap& Binary&heaps& A&merGeable&heap&is&any&Data&structure&that&supports&the& followinG&five&operaPons,&in&which&each&element&has&a&key:& • MakeHeap()&2&creates&anD&returns&a&new&heap&containinG&no&elements.& • Insert(H,x)&2&inserts&element&x,&whose&key&has&already&been&filleD&in,&into& heap&H.& • Minimum(H)&2&returns&a&pointer&to&the&element&in&heap&H&whose&key&is& minimum.& • Extract:Min(H)&2&Deletes&the&element&from&heap&H&whose&key&is&minimum,& returninG&a&pointer&to&the&element.& • Union(H1,-H2)-2&creates&anD&returns&a&new&heap&that&contains&all&the& elements&of&heaps&H1&anD&H2.&Heaps&H1&anD&H2&are&“DestroyeD”&by&this& operaPon.& • ALSO:&Increase2Element,&Delete& MerGeable&heaps&
    [Show full text]
  • Binomial Heaps Supports the Following Operations
    Priority Queues (heaps) Heaps in Action Dijkstra's Shortest Path Algorithm Binomial Heaps Supports the following operations. Insert element x. HeapInit () /*Initialized Priority Queue */ Return min element. for each v ∈∈∈ V Return and delete minimum element. d[v] ←←←∞∞∞ ; Decrease key of element x to k. HeapInsert (v) CLRS, Chapters 6, 19 Applications. d[s] ←←← 0 Dijkstra's shortest path algorithm. while (! HeapIsEmpty ()) u = Heap_Extract_Min () Thanks to Kevin Wayne for Prim's MST algorithm. the slides. for each v ∈∈∈ V(G) s.t (u,v) ∈∈∈ E(G) Event-driven simulation. if d[v] > d[u] + w(u,v) Huffman encoding. Heap_Decrease (v, d[u] + w(v,w)) Heapsort. . 2 3 Priority Queues Binomial Tree Binomial Tree Binomial tree - definition. Heaps B Useful properties of order k binomial tree B k. Recursive definition: 0 Bi Operation Linked List Binary Binomial Fibonacci * Relaxed k Number of nodes = 2 . make-heap 1 1 1 1 1 Bi is created from two Bi-1 by Bk connect the root of the Height = k. insert 1 log N log N 1 1 Bi-1 +1 find-min N 1 log N 1 1 larger key is a child of the Degree of root = k. Bi-1 delete-min N log N log N log N log N second. Deleting root yields binomial B1 B B0 union 1 N log N 1 1 2 So the degree could be trees Bk-1, … , B 0. Bk decrease-key 1 log N log N 1 1 rather large. delete N log N log N log N log N Proof.
    [Show full text]
  • Binomial Heaps
    Binomial Heaps Where We’re Going ● Binomial Heaps (Today) ● A simple, flexible, and versatile priority queue. ● Lazy Binomial Heaps (Today) ● A powerful building block for designing advanced data structures. ● Fibonacci Heaps (Tuesday) ● A heavyweight and theoretically excellent priority queue. Review: Priority Queues Priority Queues ● A priority queue is a data structure that supports these operations: ● pq.enqueue(v, k), which enqueues element v with key k; ● pq.find-min(), which returns the element with the least key; and ● pq.extract-min(), which removes and returns the element with the least key. ● They’re useful as building blocks in a bunch of algorithms. Priority Queues ● A priority queue is a data structure that supports Kilimanjaro these operations: 5,859 ● pq.enqueue(v, k), which enqueues element v with Mt. Sidley key k; Mt. Giluwe 4,285 ● pq.find-min(), which 4,368 returns the element with the least key; and ● pq.extract-min(), which removes and returns the element with the least key. Pico de Orizaba ● They’re useful as building blocks in a bunch of 5,636 algorithms. Binary Heaps ● Priority queues are frequently implemented as binary heaps. ● enqueue and extract-min run in time O(log n); find- min runs in time O(1). ● These heaps are surprisingly fast in practice. It’s tough to beat their performance! ● d-ary heaps can outperform binary heaps for a well- tuned value of d, and otherwise only the sequence heap is known to specifically outperform this family. ● (Is this information incorrect as of 2021? Let me know and I’ll update it.) ● In that case, why do we need other heaps? Priority Queues in Practice ● Many graph algorithms directly rely on priority queues supporting extra operations: ● meld(pq₁, pq₂): Destroy pq₁ and pq₂ and combine their elements into a single priority queue.
    [Show full text]