DOCSLIB.ORG

Sun Belt Conference Champ

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sun Belt Conference Champ Tournament Results: Sun Belt Conference Champ. Sun Belt Conference Champ. LPGA International Daytona BeachFL Tournament Dates: 04/18 - 04/20, 2021 Par: 72 72 Daily Low Round Yardage: 6193 6193 Daily Leader Both Fin Team Round: 1 Round: 2 Total 1 Coastal Carolina U. 284 278 562 -14 2 Texas State University 279 291 570 -6 3 Georgia Southern U. 292 297 589 +13 4 South Alabama, U. of 295 302 597 +21 5 Troy University 301 297 598 +22 6 Arkansas State Univ. 297 302 599 +23 7 Little Rock 304 299 603 +27 8 Louisiana Monroe 302 302 604 +28 9 Appalachian State U. 303 302 605 +29 10 Georgia State University 315 293 608 +32 11 UT Arlington 319 303 622 +46 Fin Name School Round: 1 Round: 2 Total 1 Sophia Carlsen Coast. Car 69 68 137 -7 2 Nicole Abelar Coast. Car 73 66 139 -5 T 3 Julie Hovland So Alabama 70 70 140 -4 T 3 Noramol Nuchsila TX State 69 71 140 -4 5 Sasikarn Somboonsup TX State 69 72 141 -3 T 6 Geraldine Wong TX State 70 72 142 -2 T 6 ShaeBug Scarberry Troy 73 69 142 -2 T 6 Tiffany Arafi Coast. Car 69 73 142 -2 9 Frantiska Lunackova Coast. Car 73 71 144 E T 10 Carlota Garcia So Alabama 71 74 145 +1 T 10 Savanah Satterfield GA Southrn 72 73 145 +1 T 12 Alberte Thuesen GA Southrn 75 71 146 +2 T 12 Nicole Lorup Troy 72 74 146 +2 T 14 Elise Schultz Ark. St. 74 73 147 +3 T 14 Marine Griffaut TX State 71 76 147 +3 COPYRIGHT ©, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, Bloomington, IL GOLFSTAT.COM Tournament Results: Sun Belt Conference Champ. Fin Name School Round: 1 Round: 2 Total 16 Malena Austerslatt LittleRock 76 72 148 +4 T 17 Agatha Alesson LittleRock 76 73 149 +5 T 17 Alessia Mengoni ULM 75 74 149 +5 T 17 Chantal Dueringer ULM 73 76 149 +5 T 17 Ella Ofstedahl GA Southrn 74 75 149 +5 T 17 Mahina Leveau Georgia St 79 70 149 +5 T 17 Olivia Schmidt Ark. St. 74 75 149 +5 T 17 Petra Duran Georgia St 77 72 149 +5 T 17 Sarah Hardin App State 73 76 149 +5 T 25 Emma Bell GA Southrn 72 78 150 +6 T 25 Siti Shaari So Alabama 73 77 150 +6 T 27 Grayson Gladden Ark. St. 73 78 151 +7 T 27 Melany Chong App State 76 75 151 +7 T 29 Abby Bolt App State 76 76 152 +8 T 29 Kayla Burke Ark. St. 76 76 152 +8 T 31 Carrie Catheri Ganim App State 78 75 153 +9 T 31 Eva Bjornsdottir ULM 76 77 153 +9 T 31 Romina Gonzalez UTA 79 74 153 +9 T 34 Fed Tavelli-Westerlu TX State 76 78 154 +10 T 34 Maria Blasco Georgia St 79 75 154 +10 T 34 Shani White ULM 78 76 154 +10 T 34 Viktoria Krnacova LittleRock 73 81 154 +10 T 38 Abby Newton GA Southrn 74 81 155 +11 T 38 Madigan Murray UTA 80 75 155 +11 T 38 Sydney Scraba LittleRock 79 76 155 +11 T 41 Anna Claire Little Troy 77 79 156 +12 T 41 Elizabeth Caldarelli Troy 81 75 156 +12 T 41 Jahaanvie Walia ULM 80 76 156 +12 T 41 Kayla Ward App State 78 78 156 +12 45 Kelly Strickland Georgia St 81 76 157 +13 T 46 Courtney Lewis Georgia St 80 78 158 +14 T 46 Kellie Gachaga LittleRock 80 78 158 +14 T 48 Abigail Adams UTA 83 76 159 +15 T 48 Elisabeth Preus Troy 79 80 159 +15 T 48 Sydney Garber UTA 78 81 159 +15 COPYRIGHT ©, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, Bloomington, IL GOLFSTAT.COM Tournament Results: Sun Belt Conference Champ. Fin Name School Round: 1 Round: 2 Total T 51 Caitlin Evans-Brand Coast. Car 80 80 160 +16 T 51 Kate Tran UTA 82 78 160 +16 53 Sydni Leung Ark. St. 85 79 164 +20 54 Caroline Berge So Alabama 81 84 165 +21 55 Nele Mattner So Alabama 85 81 166 +22 Round: 1 Round: 2 Total TEAM STATISTICS: Average Score: 299.18 296.91 298.05 Rounds Below Par: 2 1 3 Rounds Even Par: 0 0 0 Rounds Above Par: 9 10 19 PLAYER STATISTICS: Average Score: 75.91 75.33 75.62 Rounds Below Par: 8 8 16 Rounds Even Par: 3 4 7 Rounds Above Par: 44 43 87 COPYRIGHT ©, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, Bloomington, IL GOLFSTAT.COM.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Louisiana Men's Basketball Sun Belt Tournament History
    Louisiana Men’s Basketball Sun Belt Tournament History 2000 Sun Belt Conference Tournament SUN BELT CONFERENCE TOURNAMENT CHAMPIONS Coach Jesse Evans Quarterfinals - Alltel Arena (Little Rock, Ark.) March 5 - (2) Louisiana 55, (7) New Orleans 35 Semifinals - Alltel Arena (Little Rock, Ark.) March 6 - (2) Louisiana 73, (3) Louisiana Tech 58 Championship - Alltel Arena (Little Rock, Ark.) March 7 - (2) Louisiana 51, (1) South Alabama 50 2001 Sun Belt Conference Tournament Coach Jesse Evans Quarterfinals - Mitchell Center (Mobile, Ala.) March 4 - (W2) Louisiana 63, (E3) Louisiana Tech 56 Semifinals - Mitchell Center (Mobile, Ala.) March 5 - (E1) Western Kentucky 82, (W2) Louisiana 75 2002 Sun Belt Conference Tournament SUN BELT CONFERENCE TOURNAMENT RUNNER-UP Coach Jesse Evans Quarterfinals - Lakefront Arena (New Orleans, La.) March 2 - (W1) Louisiana 74, (E4) Arkansas State 59 1992 Sun Belt Conference Tournament Semifinals - Lakefront Arena (New Orleans, La.) SUN BELT CONFERENCE TOURNAMENT CHAMPIONS March 4 - (W1) Louisiana 67, (E2) Arkansas-Little Rock 53 Coach Marty Fletcher Championship - Lakefront Arena (New Orleans, La.) Quarterfinals - Mississippi Coast Coliseum (Biloxi, Miss.) March 5 - (E1) Western Kentucky 76, (W1) UL 70 March 6 - (2) Louisiana 73, (7) New Orleans 69 (OT) Semifinals - Mississippi Coast Coliseum (Biloxi, Miss.) 2003 Sun Belt Conference Tournament March 7 - (2) Louisiana 64, (6) UALR 61 Coach Jesse Evans Championship - Mississippi Coast Coliseum (Biloxi, Miss.) Quarterfinals - E.A. Diddle Arena (Bowling Green, Ky.) March 8 - (2) Louisiana 75, (1) Louisiana Tech 71 March 8 - (W5) Denver 72, (W1) UL 68 1993 Sun Belt Conference Tournament 2004 Sun Belt Conference Tournament* Coach Marty Fletcher Coach Jesse Evans Quarterfinals - Mississippi Coast Coliseum (Biloxi, Miss.) Quarterfinals - E.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Letter to Big West Conference Re
    June 26, 2020 Commissioner Dennis Farrell Big West Conference 2 Corporate Park Suite 206 Irvine, CA 92606 Dear Commissioner Farrell, We are a consortium of advocates for women and girls in sports. Access to and participation in sports improves the lives of all students, and that is particularly true for girls and women. During this time of COVID-19, we are writing to remind you of your institutional obligation to uphold Title IX.1 We understand that these are trying times for collegiate institutions, including athletics departments. In response to financial pressures, we have become aware that some universities are considering program cuts to their athletic programs.2 As the commissioner of the 1 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1688. 2 Sallee, Barrett. “Group of Five Commissioners Ask NCAA to Relax Rules That Could Allow More Sports to Be Cut.” CBS Sports, April 15, 2020. Available at: https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/group-of-five- commissioners-ask-ncaa-to-relax-rules-that-could-allow-more-sports-to-be-cut/. (Five Conferences—American Athletic Conference (AAC), Conference USA, Mid-American Conference (MAC), Mountain West Conference, and the Sun Belt Conference—formally requested the NCAA to lower the minimum team requirements for Division 1 membership. The NCAA subsequently denied their request.) See also: Hawkins, Stephen. “Slashed St. Ed's: Reeling School Cuts Teams, Breaks Hearts.” ABC News. ABC News Network, May 7, 2020. Available at: https://abcnews.go.com/Sports/wireStory/slashed-st-eds-reeling-school-cuts- teams-breaks-70563956. (Saint Edward's University cuts six varsity teams.); Keith, Braden.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Letter to ASUN Conference Re COVID Title IX Ted Gumbart 6 26
    June 26, 2020 Commissioner Ted Gumbart ASUN Conference 3301 Windy Ridge Parkway Suite 350 Atlanta, GA 30339 Dear Commissioner Gumbart, We are a consortium of advocates for women and girls in sports. Access to and participation in sports improves the lives of all students, and that is particularly true for girls and women. During this time of COVID-19, we are writing to remind you of your institutional obligation to uphold Title IX.1 We understand that these are trying times for collegiate institutions, including athletics departments. In response to financial pressures, we have become aware that some universities are considering program cuts to their athletic programs.2 As the commissioner of the 1 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1688. 2 Sallee, Barrett. “Group of Five Commissioners Ask NCAA to Relax Rules That Could Allow More Sports to Be Cut.” CBS Sports, April 15, 2020. Available at: https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/group-of-five- commissioners-ask-ncaa-to-relax-rules-that-could-allow-more-sports-to-be-cut/. (Five Conferences—American Athletic Conference (AAC), Conference USA, Mid-American Conference (MAC), Mountain West Conference, and the Sun Belt Conference—formally requested the NCAA to lower the minimum team requirements for Division 1 membership. The NCAA subsequently denied their request.) See also: Hawkins, Stephen. “Slashed St. Ed's: Reeling School Cuts Teams, Breaks Hearts.” ABC News. ABC News Network, May 7, 2020. Available at: https://abcnews.go.com/Sports/wireStory/slashed-st-eds-reeling-school-cuts- teams-breaks-70563956. (Saint Edward's University cuts six varsity teams.); Keith, Braden.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Georgia Southern Women's Tennis Postseason
    2021 GEORGIA SOUTHERN WOMEN’S TENNIS POSTSEASON GUIDE 2021 SUN BELT CONFERENCE TOURNAMENT CHAMPIONS 2021 Georgia Southern Women’s Tennis. Kneeling (l-r) Nadja Meier, Sonja Keranen. Standing (l-r) Sophie Wagemaker, Sara Barriendo, Hannah Daniel, Paula Boixader, Charlotte van Diemen, Elizabeth Goines, Paula Hijos, Mila Hartig. 2020-21 GEORGIA SOUTHERN WOMEN’S TENNIS ROSTER NAME YEAR HOMETOWN Sara Barriendo Freshman Santander, Spain Paula Boixader 5th Year Barcelona, Spain Hannah Daniel Junior Watkinsville, Ga. Elizabeth Goines Junior Atlanta, Ga. Mila Hartig Senior Pretoria, South Africa Paula Hijos Sophomore Jaca, Spain Sonja Keranen Freshman Nurmijarvi, Finland Nadja Meier Sophomore Potsdam, Germany Olivia Rothfeld Freshman Boca Raton, Fla. Charlotte van Diemen Senior Berkel and Rodenrijs, Netherlands Sophie Wagemaker Freshman Zuid-Scharwoude, Netherlands Head Coach: Sean McCaffrey (4th Season) Graduate Assistant Coach: Lena Lutzeier (First Season) Volunteer Assistant Coach: Elena Tendero (First Season) Location ......................................................................Statesboro, Ga. Head Coach ............................................................................Sean McCaffrey Founded ..................................................................................... 1906 Record at Georgia Southern................................................ 56-32 / 4 Years Enrollment ............................................................................. 27,459 Overall Record ..................................................................259-150
    [Show full text]
  • 2015-16 EM Cup Results
    LABORATORY FOR THE STUDY OF INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS 8th Annual Excellence in Management Cup Final Results 8/17/2016 This document holds the Laboratory for the Study of Intercollegiate Athletics research findings on which athletic departments are most efficient with their finances in terms of championship wins. For more information, visit lsia.tamu.edu. What is the Excellence in Management Cup? The Excellence in Management Cup was established by the Laboratory for the Study of Intercolle- giate Athletics (LSIA) at Texas A&M University in order to address the question of: Who is the most economically efficient athletic department in Football Bowl Subdivision (formerly Division I-A)? The unique, yet simple, scoring system awards more points to athletic departments that win con- ference and national championships while efficiently allocating money to win these championships. Other championship cups do not address natural competitive advantages given to universities that have higher operating budgets and play more sports (thus, more opportunities to win champion- ships). The Scope and Purpose of the EM Cup The purpose of the EM Cup is to bring awareness about NCAA athletic departments that are max- imizing fiscal resources leading to championship victories. In other words, when less money is spent winning championships will lead to a higher score in the Excellence in Management Cup. How are the EM Cup scores calculated? Due to athletic departments being unique in size, economic strength, and number of opportunities available to win championships, the EM Cup results are calculated using a formula that will even the playing field. A database was created to tally the following information in the scoring system depicted below pictorially.
    [Show full text]
  • NCAA Division I Conference Composition, 2017-18
    APPENDIX A NCAA DIVISION I CONFERENCE COMPOSITION 2017-18 America East Conference Binghamton University University of Maine University of New Hampshire, Stony Brook University University of Maryland, Durham University at Albany – State Baltimore County University of Vermont University of New York University of Massachusetts, University of Hartford Lowell American Athletics Conference (American) East Carolina University University of Central Florida University of South Florida Southern Methodist University of Cincinnati University of Tulsa University University of Connecticut Wichita State University Temple University University of Houston Tulane University University of Memphis Atlantic 10 Conference Davidson College La Salle University University of Massachusetts, Duquesne University St. Bonaventure University Amherst Fordham University Saint Joseph's University University of Rhode Island George Mason University Saint Louis University University of Richmond George Washington University of Dayton Virginia Commonwealth University University Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC) Boston College North Carolina State University of Notre Dame Clemson University University University of Pittsburgh Duke University Syracuse University University of Virginia Florida State University University of Louisville Virginia Polytechnic Institute Georgia Institute of University of Miami and State University Technology University of North Carolina Wake Forest University at Chapel Hill Atlantic Sun Conference (ASUN) Florida Gulf Coast University New Jersey Institute
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Report 6/24/04
    Preliminary Report 6/24/04 UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT MONROE ATHLETICS DEPARTMENT “ASSESSMENT OF ULM ATHLETICS OPERATIONS” CARR SPORTS ASSOCIATES, INC. June 24, 2004 Preliminary Report 6/24/04 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................1 B. PROCESS .........................................................................................................2 C. OBSERVATIONS Policy Issues.................................................................................................2 ULM Athletics Profile .................................................................................3 Athletics Department Design and Operating Procedures ............................4 NCAA Legislation Involving Division I-A Membership – ULM Status ....4 Fiscal Issues .................................................................................................5 External Revenue Issues ..............................................................................5 Facilities.......................................................................................................6 Personnel......................................................................................................6 Support Systems Analysis............................................................................7 D. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.........................................8 E. COMPREHENSIVE CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .. 12 ATTACHMENTS 1 – 6 Attachment 1: Study Assumptions Attachment
    [Show full text]
  • MVC in the NCAA Tournament
    MVC in the NCAA Tournament Year-By-Year Record for Valley Schools in the NCAA Division I Championship NCAA Record & Appearances for Current Missouri Valley Conference Members 1939 (0) - MVC did not compete. The first national collegiate men’s basketball tour- Current Valley schools have a combined record of 40-59 nament was held. For the first 12 years, district in NCAA Tournament action while they’ve been league playoffs often were held with the winner entering an members. The following is a breakdown by school with eight-team field for the championship. The district the number of appearances in parentheses: games were not considered a part of the tourna- ment. The winners of the East and West regionals School -- Final Four -- Last were the only two teams to advance to the final site. (Appearances) Record 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Tourn. 1940 (0) - MVC did not compete. Bradley (6) 5-6 0 1 0 0 2006 Creighton (12) 4-12 0 0 0 0 2007 1941 (1) - Creighton defeats Wyoming, 45-44, for third place in Drake (4) 5-4 0 0 1 0 2008 Western Regional. Creighton loses its first game to Evansville (1) 0-1 0 0 0 0 1999 Washington State, 48-39. (Record: 1-1) Illinois State (6) 3-6 0 0 0 0 1998 1942 (0) - MVC did not compete. Indiana State (4) 5-4 0 1 0 0 2011 Missouri State (2) 2-2 0 0 0 0 1999 1943 (0) - MVC did not compete. UNI (5) 2-5 0 0 0 0 2010 1944 (0) - MVC did not compete.
    [Show full text]
  • More- for IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 John Baldwin Director of Championships 317-917-6222 TEAMS AND INDIVIDUALS SELECTED FOR 2021 NCAA DIVISION I MEN’S GOLF CHAMPIONSHIPS INDIANAPOLIS---The NCAA Division I Men’s Golf Committee has selected the teams and individuals to participate in the 2021 NCAA Division I Men’s Golf Championships. Six 54-hole regional tournaments will be conducted May 17-19. Thirteen teams and 10 individuals not on those teams will compete at each of three regionals while the other three regionals will have 14 teams and five individuals not on those teams. The low five teams and the low individual not on those teams from each regional will advance to the finals. Team and individual medalist titles will be decided May 28-June 2 at Grayhawk Golf Club in Scottsdale, Ariz. Arizona State and The Thunderbirds are the hosts for the 2021 championships. Listed below are the teams and individuals selected to participate in the championships. Teams winning automatic qualification are designated by their conferences in parentheses. The Sagamore Club – Noblesville, Ind. Hosted by Ball State and Hamilton County Sports Authority Teams (seeded in the following order): 1. Texas 2. North Carolina [Atlantic Coast Conference] 3. Tennessee 4. North Florida -more- NCAA NEWS RELEASE May 5, 2021 Page No. 2 _________ 5. Louisville 6. South Florida [American Athletic Conference] 7. UAB 8. Duke 9. UNCW 10. Arkansas State 11. Campbell [Big South Conference] 12. UT Martin [Ohio Valley Conference] 13. Loyola Chicago [Missouri Valley Conference] Individuals (seeded in the following order): 1. Ross Steelman, Missouri 2.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESS RELEASE for IMMEDIATE RELEASE | OCTOBER 23, 2020 CONTACT | Tony Fay PR, Tony Fay, 972.273.0794, [email protected]
    PRESS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE | OCTOBER 23, 2020 CONTACT | Tony Fay PR, Tony Fay, 972.273.0794, [email protected] ‘BOWL SEASON’ ANNOUNCED AS NEW NAME OF COLLEGE FOOTBALL’S POSTSEASON Logo and visual identity developed for the annual “Celebration of College Football” DALLAS, TEXAS (October 23, 2020) -- The Football Bowl Association is getting a new name and brand: Bowl Season. The debut of the name change, logo and website for the organization is part of a major brand overhaul announced today by Executive Director Nick Carparelli. The new Bowl Season tagline, “A Celebration of College Football,” embraces the grand tradition of the bowl system and its enduring value to student-athletes. Highlighting the broader university community, including spirit squads, marching bands, student athletic staff and fans, Bowl Season will work with all existing bowls to promote the benefits of the entire bowl system. Carparelli has collaborated over the last six months with leaders of the 44 bowl games, each of the 10 FBS conferences, media partners and other stakeholders to build consensus and solidify plans for the new brand. “For four decades, the Football Bowl Association has served as a staunch advocate of the bowl system,” said Carparelli. “But until now, it’s been a behind-the-scenes organization designed to facilitate conversation among bowl leadership and stakeholders. Since joining the organization last spring, I’ve listened to our membership’s clear desire for a new identity-- to rebrand the FBA to speak directly to those who love this sport.” “The stretch from mid-December through the first week of January marks one of the most endlessly entertaining times on the sports calendar,” Carparelli continues.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Basketball
    Sun Belt Conference Women’s Basketball WOMEN’SWOMEN’S BASKETBALLBASKETBALL Women’s Basketball Record Book 233 Sun Belt Conference Women’s Basketball YEAR IN REVIEW 2018-19 FINAL STANDINGS Conference Overall W-L Pct. PF PA W-L Pct. PF PA Home Away Neutral Last 10 Streak &*! Little Rock 15-3 0.833 64.4 53.1 21-11 0.656 61.4 56.8 10-5 9-5 2-1 7-3 L 1 *! UTA 15-3 0.833 71.7 59.1 24-8 0.750 70.6 59.6 12-3 12-4 0-1 7-3 L 1 ! Troy 13-5 0.722 82.4 74.6 22-9 0.710 82.3 72.4 12-3 8-5 2-1 6-4 L 2 ! Georgia State 11-7 0.611 64.9 62.9 17-14 0.548 63.3 63.4 10-4 7-9 0-1 5-5 L 2 ! Appalachian State 10-8 0.556 69.6 67.9 22-14 0.611 68.5 67.7 14-3 6-10 2-1 8-2 W 4 ! South Alabama 9-9 0.500 63.4 63.8 25-11 0.694 68.0 63.2 12-3 9-7 4-1 6-4 L 1 ! Texas State 9-9 0.500 60.4 60.5 14-17 0.452 62.5 62.0 7-7 7-8 0-2 5-5 L 2 ! Coastal Carolina 8-10 0.444 67.8 69.4 17-15 0.531 71.2 66.6 11-6 6-6 0-3 5-5 L 2 ! Arkansas State 7-11 0.389 69.3 73.6 12-18 0.400 67.7 72.6 9-5 3-13 0-0 4-6 L 1 ! Louisiana 5-13 0.278 62.3 68.8 7-23 0.233 61.9 70.7 5-9 2-13 0-1 1-9 L 6 ULM 4-14 0.222 53.2 63.1 10-19 0.345 55.8 61.0 6-8 4-11 0-0 3-7 L 1 Georgia Southern 2-16 0.111 62.2 74.9 7-22 0.241 62.2 73.6 4-10 3-12 0-0 1-9 L 8 ! - clinched tournament berth | * - clinched a share of regular season title | & - clinched tournament title SUN BELT TOURNAMENT RESULTS SUN BELT POSTSEASON RESULTS TUESDAY, MARCH 6 (FIRST ROUND) THURSDAY, MARCH 15 G1: Appalachian State 79, Arkansas State 68 WNIT FIRST ROUND G2: South Alabama 80, ULM 54 Texas State at Rice ...............................................................................................L, 60-71 G3: Coastal Carolina 74, Georgia State 55 G4: Louisiana 88, Georgia Southern 81 (3OT) WBI FIRST ROUND Stetson at South Alabama ..................................................................................W, 49-33 THURSDAY, MARCH 8 (QUARTERFINALS) G5: Little Rock 66, Appalachian State 34 SATURDAY, MARCH 17 G6: Troy 82, South Alabama 79 NCAA FIRST ROUND G7: Texas State 78, Coastal Carolina 69 G8: Louisiana 54, UTA 48 No.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012-13 EM Cup Results
    What is the Excellence in Management Cup? The Excellence in Management Cup was established by the Laboratory for the Study of Intercollegiate Athletics (LSIA) at Texas A&M University in order to address the question of: Who is the most economically efficient athletic department in Football Bowl Subdivision (formerly Division I-A)? The unique, yet simple, scoring system awards more points to athletic departments that win conference and national championships while efficiently allocating money to win these championships. Other championship cups do not address natural competitive advantages given to universities that have higher operating budgets and play more sports (thus, more opportunities to win championships). The Scope and Purpose of the EM Cup The purpose of the EM Cup is to bring awareness about NCAA athletic departments that are maximizing fiscal resources leading to championship victories. In other words, when less money is spent winning championships will lead to a higher score in the Excellence in Management Cup. How are the EM Cup scores calculated? Because athletic departments are unique from one another in size, economic strength, and number of opportunities available to win championships, the EM Cup results are calculated using a formula that will even the playing field. A database was created to tally the following information in the scoring system depicted below pictorially. National and conference champions are tallied for each NCAA and Conference-specific sanctioned sport and awarded to the winners. More value is placed upon the national championships than conference championships in the formula. Then, each the athletic department’s operating expenses and number of sports played at the university are entered into the database.
    [Show full text]