DOCSLIB.ORG

Turning to God in Acts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TURNING TO GOD IN ACTS: INSIGHTS FROM THREE KEY CONVERSION NARRATIVES BY LUKE A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Charles Sturt University By Russell Warnken B Ec, M Div, M Th Charles Sturt University August 2018 ii Table of Contents Certificate of Authorship ............................................................................. v Acknowledgements ..................................................................................... vi Abstract ........................................................................................................ vii Abbreviations ................................................................................................ x Introduction ................................................................................................... 1 1. Methodology ........................................................................................... 11 1.1 The genre of Acts ............................................................................... 11 1.2 Narrative Criticism ............................................................................ 26 1.3 Textual Criticism ................................................................................ 61 1.4 The narrative unit chosen ................................................................. 63 1.5 Chapter outline ................................................................................... 68 Conclusion ................................................................................................ 68 2. Conversion in Context ........................................................................... 73 2.1 Conversion in Judaism ...................................................................... 74 2.2 John the Baptist .................................................................................. 92 2.3 Conversion in paganism ................................................................... 97 2.4 Conversion in philosophy .............................................................. 101 Conclusion .............................................................................................. 105 3. The Conversion of the Ethiopian Eunuch (Acts 8:26–40) ............... 109 3.1 The passage: setting, structure and development ....................... 109 3.2 The position of the passage in Acts ............................................... 115 3.3 Textual issues.................................................................................... 119 3.4 Divine agents .................................................................................... 121 3.5 Human involvement ....................................................................... 127 3.6 Baptism .............................................................................................. 146 Conclusion .............................................................................................. 153 4. The Conversion of Saul (Acts 9:1–30) ................................................ 157 iii 4.1 The passage: setting, structure and development....................... 157 4.2 Textual issues ................................................................................... 168 4.3 The conversion of Saul .................................................................... 171 4.4 Human involvement ....................................................................... 216 4.5 Divine agency ................................................................................... 228 Conclusion .............................................................................................. 239 5. The Conversion of Cornelius (Acts 10:1–11:18) ................................ 243 5.1 The passage: setting, structure and development....................... 244 5.2 Textual issues ................................................................................... 251 5.3 Divine agents .................................................................................... 258 5.4 Human involvement ....................................................................... 288 Conclusion .............................................................................................. 317 6. Conclusion: Reflections on Turning to God in Acts ......................... 319 6.1 The approach taken ......................................................................... 319 6.2 Divine agency ................................................................................... 323 6.3 Human agency ................................................................................. 332 6.4 The importance of the conversion experience ............................. 356 6.5 The church grows by conversions ................................................. 358 6.6 Wider implications .......................................................................... 359 In conclusion ........................................................................................... 366 Bibliography ............................................................................................... 371 iv Certificate of Authorship I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by another person nor material which to a substantial extent has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at Charles Sturt University or any other educational institution, except where due acknowledgment is made in the thesis. Any contribution made to the research by colleagues with whom I have worked at Charles Sturt University or elsewhere during my candidature is fully acknowledged. I agree that this thesis be accessible for the purpose of study and research in accordance with the normal conditions established by the Executive Director, Library Services or nominee, for the care, loan and reproduction of theses. Signature: Date: 11 July 2017 v Acknowledgements A part-time thesis is a long journey with many ups and downs. It is a journey that needs special companions to finish it. Two people deserve special mention in regard to this thesis. First of all, my principal supervisor, Dr David Neville, Head of the School of Theology, Faculty of Arts and Education, Charles Sturt University. This thesis would never have reached this stage without his generous support and encouragement, unflagging patience and scholarly counsel. I also need to thank my wife, Annette, for her continued encouragement and support, as well as her willingness to put up with an absent husband, isolated in his study over a long period of time. I also thank Dr Bernard Doherty, a colleague in the School of Theology, for his valuable assistance with chapter 2, and Reverend Professor James Haire for his contribution to the early chapters of my thesis. vi Abstract In this thesis I use narrative criticism, supplemented by features of historical and textual criticism, to examine Luke’s accounts of the conversions of the Ethiopian (Acts 8:26–40), Saul (Acts 9:1–30) and Cornelius (Acts 10:1–11:18). Narrative criticism was chosen as a methodology to concentrate on what Luke wrote and to avoid unresolvable historical-critical issues (for example, sources and reconciling the Paul of his letters with the Paul of Acts). The stance adopted is that of a present-day reader who uses various critical tools such as the latest Koine Greek text, textual criticism and historical analysis of the Lukan text to read, as far as possible, the passages in Acts as the Lukan reader might have read them. I propose that Acts 8:4–11:18 is a literary block which has a major theme of conversion and from which I have chosen to examine closely three conversion accounts: the Ethiopian eunuch, Saul and Cornelius. To better understand the Lukan narrative of Saul’s conversion in Acts 9 I have also looked at the Lukan Paul’s reflections on his conversion in Acts 22:1–16 and 26:1–23. vii To contextualize the three conversion accounts I survey conversion in Second Temple Judaism (including John the Baptist), Hellenistic paganism and philosophy. My aim is to understand the likely influences on early Christians that shaped their understanding of conversion and how those who heard the call to repent and be baptized understood it? I conclude that the strongest influence, but not the only one, was most likely Second Temple Judaism. While I consider how Luke structures his conversion narratives to create an impact, my main focus is on how Luke portrays the divine and human characters in each account. In the three narratives examined I find that the initiative in the conversion process is with divine agency, which also has a guiding role in the ensuing developments in each conversion. However, divine agency is manifested in different forms, including angels, visions, divine voices, providential ordering of events, the Holy Spirit, even a manifestation of the ascended Jesus. There is variety also in those who are converted and how they are converted. I further argue that despite its prominence divine agency does not overwhelm human involvement. Rather, it is played out in ways that allow the human characters to remain fully human. At the least, these characters have to cooperate willingly with the divine. The viii intersection of the divine and the human is most clearly seen in the act of baptism, which is common to all three conversion accounts. In baptism human agency responds to divine agency, the human embraces the divine and encapsulates
Recommended publications
  • Vergil's Nisus and the Language of Self-Sacrifice In

    Vergil's Nisus and the Language of Self-Sacrifice In

    Vergil’s Nisus and the Language of Self-Sacrifice in Paradise Lost LEAH WHITTINGTON Princeton University When the Son of God offers to die for mankind in book 3 of Paradise Lost (1667), readers who have been tempted to join the devil’s party for the first two books of the poem confront an unsettling dramatic scene: the assembly in heaven is staged as a mirror image of the demonic council at Pandemonium. The listening host suddenly grows quiet, and a solitary hero figure emerges out of the silence to take on the burden of raising the collective fortune. Placed beside the Son’s promise to atone for man’s sin with his death, Satan’s exploratory mission to earth comes into focus as a fallen reflection of self-sacrifice, a self-aggrandiz- ing perversion of the poem’s heroic ideal now articulated in the Son. This moment of internal self-reference has often been identified as part of Milton’s didactic strategy to confront the reader with proof of his own fallenness,1 but it is less often recognized that the Son’s speech to the angelic host makes use of an allusion that gives it a central place in the story of Milton’s engagement with classical epic.2 When the Son 1. See Stanley Fish, Surprised by Sin (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971). Fish famously argues that the heroic portrayal of Satan is part of a larger narrative strategy by which Milton provokes the reader ‘‘with evidence of his corruption’’ and forces him ‘‘to refine his perceptions so that his understanding will be once more proportionable to truth’’ (xiii).
  • Paul's Concluding Words Before King Agrippa

    Paul's Concluding Words Before King Agrippa

    Paul’s Concluding Words before King Agrippa So far in his defence before King Agrippa, the Apostle Paul has given his testimony of what happened to him until that day Jesus stopped him in his tracks on the road to Damascus. All of this was just background information, and didn’t really explain why Paul was seized by the Jews in the first place. Paul’s next few words briefly explain how he followed the leading of the Lord in his life from that day forward. Here is how he worded his defence: ACTS 26:19 Whereupon, C king Agrippa, I nas not disobedient unto the heavenly vision: 20 But shewed first unto them of Damascus, and at Jerusalem, and throughout all the coasts ofjudaea, and then to the Gentiles, that they should repent and turn to God, and do works meet for repentance. 21 For these causes the Jews caught me in the temple, and went about to kill ma 22 Having therefore obtained help of God, I con tinue unto this day, witnessing both to small and great saying none other things than those which the prophets and Moses did say should come: 23 That Christ should suffer; and that he should be the first that should rise from the dead, and should shew light unto the people, and to the Gentiles. Let’s look at these words a little closer. In verse 19 Paul wants to make sure King Agrippa is listening to this next, and most important part of his testimony as it pertains to the charges brought against him, so Paul directly calls King Agrippa to attention by stating: Whereupon, C king Agrippa, I was not disobedient unto the heavenly vision:..
  • NEGLECTED CHARACTERS of the BIBLE: ANANIAS Sermon

    NEGLECTED CHARACTERS of the BIBLE: ANANIAS Sermon

    NEGLECTED CHARACTERS OF THE BIBLE: ANANIAS Sermon Preached by the Rev. Dr. Lindley G. DeGarmo Union Church of Pocantico Hills August 30, 2020 Psalm 145:10-18 Acts 9:1-20 I am continuing this week with my series of sermons on neglected characters of the Bible. It’s based on the work of Bishop William Willimon while he was Dean of the Chapel at Duke University, and focuses on a number of the “little people” of the Bible— folks who arguably play a minor role in the story of God, and who therefore rarely receive much pulpit time. Last week, we talked about Rahab the prostitute from Jericho, who helped fulfill God’s promise to settle the people of Israel in the land of Canaan. Today, we turn to the newer testament and a man: Ananias of Damascus. The call or conversion of Paul is a dramatic event, etched indelibly forever in the Christian consciousness. He was not always known as Paul. In the Jewish community he was known as Saul of Tarsus, a devout Pharisee, a scholar and zealous adherent of the Jewish law. And, he was one of the first and fiercest foes of the young Jesus movement. He was convinced that these Jesus-followers were a dangerous cult, renegades within Judaism, and that they would irreparably damage Judaism with their blasphemous innovation, their claims of Jesus as Messiah. And so, Saul persecuted Christians. He was there when Stephen became the first Christian martyr. He held the coats of the elders who stoned Stephen, and Luke tells us “Saul approved of their killing him.”1 Saul was on his way to Damascus with official letters from the Jewish authorities giving him power to seek out and destroy Christian groups there.
  • PROMOTIONAL ORIGINAL (Un-Lim & A/B)

    PROMOTIONAL ORIGINAL (Un-Lim & A/B)

    The Official TLG Redemption® CCG Price Guide AUGUST 2018 V1.0 Job $20.00 Stillness $2.50 PROMOTIONAL John $2.50 The Serpent $20.00 Year: N/A Cards: 96 Set: $875.00* Includes Product & Tournament cards Jonathan, son of Joiada $5.00 The Tabernacle $30.00 *Price does not include (’__ Nats) cards Joshua (District) $4.50 The Watchman $5.00 ______________________________________________________________________________________ A Child is Born $4.00 Joshua (Settlers) $7.25 Thorn in the Flesh $4.00 Abram’s Army $26.00 King David $16.50 Walking on Water $4.00 Adonijah $2.50 King Solomon $5.00 Water to Wine $2.00 Angel at Shur $4.00 Laban $5.00 Whirlwind/Everlasting Ground$30.00 Angel Food $2.00 Laban (2018) $15.00 Windows of Narrow Light $2.00 Angel of the Lord (‘16 Nats) $75.00 Lost Soul $2.00 Wings of Calamity $2.00 Angel of the Lord (‘17 Nats) $75.00 Lost Soul 2016 $15.00 Zerubbabel $4.00 Angel of the Lord (‘18 Nats) $75.00 Love $2.00 Authority of Christ $7.75 Majestic Heavens $15.00 ORIGINAL (un-lim & a/b) Mary (Chriatmas) $2.00 Year: ’95/’96 Cards: 170 Set: $65.00 Bartimaeus $2.50 Sealed Box: $40.50 Pack: $.90 Blank (both sides) $2.50 Mary's Prophetic Act $2.50 Sealed Deck: $25.00 ______________________________________________________________________________________ Meditiation $2.00 Blank (w/ Redemption back) $4.00 Aaron's Rod $0.50 Michael (‘17 Nats) $75.00 Boaz’s Sandal $5.00 Abaddon the Destroyer $0.75 Mighty Warrior $2.00 Book of the Covenant $5.00 Abandonment $0.50 New Jerusalem $9.75 Brass Serpent $5.25 Abihu $0.25 Nicanor $4.00 Burial
  • THE HOLY ASCENSION ORTHODOX CHURCH Is the Washington, DC

    THE HOLY ASCENSION ORTHODOX CHURCH Is the Washington, DC

    HOLY ASCENSION PARISH NEWSLETTER, JULY-AUGUST 2011 Transfiguration of Our Lord, St Katherine’s Monastery, Sinai. THE HOLY ASCENSION ORTHODOX CHURCH is the Washington, DC, parish of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad (ROCA), under the omophor (or the conciliar leadership) of Metropolitan Agafangel (Pashkovsky), Bishop of Odessa & Taurida. The Holy Ascension Parish was organized on Ascension Day, 17 May 2007. BISHOPS & LOCAL CLERGY Metropolitan Agafangel, First Hierarch of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad, Metropolitan of Eastern America and New York, and Bishop of Odessa & Taurida Bishop Joseph (Hrebinka) of Washington Father John Hinton, priest Deacon Andrew Frick Seraphim Englehardt, subdeacon John Herbst, subdeacon ADDRESS 3921 University Drive, Fairfax VA 22030 703.533.9445. HOLY ASCENSION ORTHODOX CHURCH, JULY 2011 PART 1. OUR PARISH. The Holy Ascension parish welcomes all Orthodox people to its sacraments and all people with an interest in Christianity and the abiding Tradition of the Holy Orthodox Church. The immediate Holy Ascension parish background is Russian émigré and American, with many other English- speaking members. Members, visitors, and people in touch online come from all ethnicities. The Church is One. http://www.holyascension.info/ . http://ruschurchabroad.com/ http://sinod.ruschurchabroad.org/engindex.htm PART 2. NATIVITY OF ST JOHN THE BAPTIST, JULY 7. Christians have long interpreted the life of John the Baptist as a preparation for the coming of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the circumstances of his birth, as recorded in the New Testament, are miraculous. The sole biblical account of birth of St. John the Baptist comes from the Gospel of St Luke. St.
  • THE CESSATION of HEALING MIRACLES in PAUL's MINISTRY Τ Gary W

    THE CESSATION of HEALING MIRACLES in PAUL's MINISTRY Τ Gary W

    BIBUOTHECA SACRA 155 (July-September 1998): 299-315 THE CESSATION OF HEALING MIRACLES IN PAUL'S MINISTRY τ Gary W. Derickson .^L. his article addresses the issue of the cessation of the exer­ cise of the gift of healing by the apostle Paul on the basis of the historical-theological evidence of the New Testament record. Three lines of evidence suggest that Paul was unable to perform healing miracles near the end of his ministry. The first line of evidence comes from a study of Pauline literature. The second line of evidence is from an evaluation of the record of the three men Paul failed to heal, their circumstances, and arguments that Paul would have healed them if he could. A third line of evidence stems from Hebrews 2:3-4. These three areas of evidence indi­ cate that miraculous gifts of the Holy Spirit were no longer being distributed to the body of Christ by the end of the first century, but that the church was being given gifted individuals (Eph. 2:20; 4:11). Nonmiraculous spiritual gifts, of course, continued to be given to believers by the Holy Spirit. Further, even those who had previously had the ability to perform miracles were no longer able to exercise that gift as they had previously done. God's inter­ ventions through individuals gradually ceased in the waning years of the first century. MIRACLES AND MIRACLE WORKERS The range of opinion on the issue of miracle workers is spread between those who believe God continues to work miracles today in the same manner and number as in the first century1 and Gary W.
  • Lesson 7 – Saul's Conversion Text: Acts 9 Main Characters: God, Jesus

    Lesson 7 – Saul's Conversion Text: Acts 9 Main Characters: God, Jesus

    Lesson 7 – Saul’s Conversion Text: Acts 9 Main Characters: God, Jesus, Saul, Ananias, Barnabas, Peter, Aeneas, Dorcas (Tabitha) Key Passages: - Acts 9:15-16 – Saul had been chosen by the Lord to preach to the Gentiles and others. - Acts 9:18-20 – Once Saul had been healed of his blindness, he immediately obeyed and preached. Main Storyline: After Stephen was stoned, Saul became even more zealous to persecute Jesus’ disciples, whom he believed were blaspheming God. He asked the high priest for written permission to go to the synagogues in Damascus to arrest any disciples of Christ that he could find. He was granted his request, and he and some other men began the journey to Damascus to continue the persecution of the church. As Saul and the other men approached Damascus, suddenly, a light shone around Saul from Heaven. Saul was stunned, and he fell to the ground. Then he heard a voice which asked, “Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me?” Saul recognized the authority of the one speaking and asked, “Who are you, Lord?” The Lord responded, “I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting…” Saul trembled and was astonished when he heard Jesus reveal himself. He asked Jesus what he should do, and Jesus instructed him to go to Damascus for further instructions. The other men with Saul could not understand what was happening. When Saul got up from the ground, he realized that he had been blinded and could not see. The other men led him to Damascus, where he fasted for three days, still blind.
  • Virgil, Aeneid 11 (Pallas & Camilla) 1–224, 498–521, 532–96, 648–89, 725–835 G

    Virgil, Aeneid 11 (Pallas & Camilla) 1–224, 498–521, 532–96, 648–89, 725–835 G

    Virgil, Aeneid 11 (Pallas & Camilla) 1–224, 498–521, 532–96, 648–89, 725–835 G Latin text, study aids with vocabulary, and commentary ILDENHARD INGO GILDENHARD AND JOHN HENDERSON A dead boy (Pallas) and the death of a girl (Camilla) loom over the opening and the closing part of the eleventh book of the Aeneid. Following the savage slaughter in Aeneid 10, the AND book opens in a mournful mood as the warring parti es revisit yesterday’s killing fi elds to att end to their dead. One casualty in parti cular commands att enti on: Aeneas’ protégé H Pallas, killed and despoiled by Turnus in the previous book. His death plunges his father ENDERSON Evander and his surrogate father Aeneas into heart-rending despair – and helps set up the foundati onal act of sacrifi cial brutality that caps the poem, when Aeneas seeks to avenge Pallas by slaying Turnus in wrathful fury. Turnus’ departure from the living is prefi gured by that of his ally Camilla, a maiden schooled in the marti al arts, who sets the mold for warrior princesses such as Xena and Wonder Woman. In the fi nal third of Aeneid 11, she wreaks havoc not just on the batt lefi eld but on gender stereotypes and the conventi ons of the epic genre, before she too succumbs to a premature death. In the porti ons of the book selected for discussion here, Virgil off ers some of his most emoti ve (and disturbing) meditati ons on the tragic nature of human existence – but also knows how to lighten the mood with a bit of drag.
  • SSS 2019 Acts Handouts

    SSS 2019 Acts Handouts

    !1 MISSION IMPOSSIBLE? The Word of God and Evangelisation Today Holy Cross College 2019 Kieran J. O’Mahony www.tarsus.ie The First Christian History: the Acts of the Apostles Learning today from the very first generations Programme 1. Introduction to the Acts (p. 1) 2. Pentecost tableau (p. 8) 3. Speeches in Acts (p. 14) 4. Conversion of Cornelius (p. 18) 5. Paul in Athens (p. 23) 6. Paul in Rome (p. 28) 1. Introduction to the Acts • First of all • Two “big” stories • Getting started • History? • Date, authorship, location • Prayer / Conversation First of all… • The world of Acts • Our world(s)!!! • This is a rattling good story, full of excitement and drama. • Plenty of friendship • Plenty of conflict • Two “big” stories with lots of little stories around as well… • Two “big” stories: Peter and Paul • Two volumes: Gospel and Acts together • Starts in Jerusalem and ends in Rome. • Really the story of Peter and then Paul; Peter peters out. • Large biblical theology of history, found chiefly in the speeches. • About one third of Acts is made up of speeches. • The break with Judaism and the inclusion of the Gentiles. • The “we” passages in Acts. • The vast number of characters. • Certain scenes receive extensive treatment (Cornelius; the journey to Rome). • Ends happily, but strangely without closure. Two “big” stories Two volumes: Gospel and Acts together Preface Luke 1:1-4 Part I Luke 1:5-2:52 The time of Israel reaches its climax Part II Luke 3:1-Acts 1:26 The time of Jesus Part III Acts 2:1-28:31 The time of the Church www.tarsus.ie !2
  • The Preface to Luke and the Kerygma in Acts," W

    The Preface to Luke and the Kerygma in Acts," W

    A. J. B. Higgins, “The Preface to Luke and the Kerygma in Acts," W. Ward Gasque & Ralph P. Martin, eds., Apostolic History and the Gospel. Biblical and Historical Essays Presented to F.F. Bruce. Exeter: The Paternoster Press, 1970. Hbk. ISBN: 085364098X. pp.78-91. CHAPTER IV The Preface to Luke and the Kerygma in Acts A. J. B. Higgins [p.78] According to ancient tradition Luke both the Gospel and the Acts.1 While the identity of “Luke” is disputed, unity of authorship, including the “we” sections of Acts in their present form, is widely accepted on the basis of style and language.2 The Lukan writings also form a distinct theological unit within the New Testament, so that we can speak of the theology of Luke”.3 The most notable attempt to disprove unity of authorship on linguistic grounds was that of A. C. Clark,4 who tried to demonstrate that the linguistic differences between Luke and Acts are much more important than the resemblances; that they cannot be explained, as Hawkins thought, by the supposition that Acts was written considerably later than the gospel; and that they point, in fact, to different authors. But the complete unsoundness of Clark’s arguments was proved by W. L. Knox.5 The common authorship of the two Lukan writings may be regarded as established. I Does the Lukan preface (Luke 1:1-4) refer only to the gospel, or to both the gospel and Acts?6 The former view is supported by H. Conzelmann7 and E. Haenchen.8 [p.79] In 1953 R.
  • The Acts of the Non-Apostles Karen Kogler; July 1, 2006 Biblical Exegesis Class Concordia Univ., Irvine, CA; Dr

    The Acts of the Non-Apostles Karen Kogler; July 1, 2006 Biblical Exegesis Class Concordia Univ., Irvine, CA; Dr

    Churches Equipping Saints for Service The Acts of the Non-apostles Karen Kogler; July 1, 2006 Biblical Exegesis class Concordia Univ., Irvine, CA; Dr. Michael Middendorf The Acts of the Apostles , it is often said, would be more appropriately titled The Acts of the Holy Spirit . The Holy Spirit is the main character, “an almost tangible force, visible if not in itself, certainly in its effects” ( New Intl Dictionary of NT Theology , p. 698) in this story of the movement of God’s word. Luke tells this story primarily through the ministries of Peter and Paul, yet a great many other believers also populate the pages of Acts. This paper will focus on the non-apostolic people--people other than the 12 apostles and Paul--in the first 15 chapters of Acts, through the pivotal Jerusalem Council. While looking at the work of the Holy Spirit through these people, implications for the Spirit’s work through the people of today’s church will also be suggested. Non-apostolic believers in Acts encompass a wide variety of individuals. The church as a whole is frequently mentioned, as in 2:44, “All the believers were together and had everything in common” and 12:5, “the church was earnestly praying.” Luke’s periodic progress reports often reference believers, as in 6:7, “The number of disciples in Jerusalem increased rapidly,” and 9:31, “the church . grew in numbers.” Many non-apostolic believers are named, including the lowly and women, such as Jesus’ mother Mary (1:14), the paralytic Aeneas (9:33-35), and the servant Rhoda (12:13-15).
  • Governor Felix's Treatment of Paul

    Governor Felix's Treatment of Paul

    Governor Felix’s Treatment of Paul We have just looked at the doctrine of resurrection, which the Apostle Paul taught, and preached, and left us so much information. Three times in sermons, or speeches that he gave, the Apostle Paul wasn’t allowed to say any more after mentioning the resurrection of the dead. In ACTS 17 during his sermon on Mars hill, we read this concerning Paul preaching about Jesus: 31 ..whereof he hath given assurance unto all men, in that he bath raised him from the dead 32 And when they heard of the resurrection of the dead, some mocked: and others said, We will hear thee again of this matter. 33 So Paul departed from among them. We see here that the majority in Athens didn’t want to here the message about resurrected Jesus Christ. Again before the Sanhedrin council in ACTS 23:6 Paul’s final words he was allowed to speak unto them were: ...Men and brethren, 1 am a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee: of the hope and resurrection of the dead I am called in question. 7 And when he had so said, there arose a dissension between the Pharisees and the Sadducees: and the multitude was divided. 8 For the Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, neither angel, nor spirit: but the Pharisees confess both. 9 And there arose a great cry: and the scribes that were of the Pharisee? part arose, and strove, saying, We find no evil in this man: but if a spirit or an angel hath spoken to him, let us not fight against God.