Daily Situation Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Daily Situation Report CIVIL DEFENCE COMMISSION Thomas Road, Thomas Lands, Georgetown, Guyana. Phone: (592)226-1114, 226-8815, 225-5847, 226-1027; Fax: 592-225-0486 Website: http://www.cdc.gy; E-mail: [email protected] SITUATION REPORT # 4 as of 1000 hours, May 10, 2012 SUBJECT: Flooding in several regions of Guyana. 1. EVENT As a result of heavy and continuous rainfall over the last 72 hours, several areas in all ten (10) Regions of Guyana were reported to be flooded. The water levels at the four (4) locations in the East Demerara Water Conservancy (EDWC) have been recorded as follows: Location May 08, 2012 May 09, 2012 May 10, 2012 Rainfall Water Level Rainfall Water Level Rainfall Water Level Lama 56:75 6.1mm 56.70 13.9mm 56.70 Flag Staff 26.3mm 57.15 4.6mm 57.10 57.10 Land of Canaan 10.8mm 57.10 1.1mm 57.10 55.65 Mahaica Creek 54.60 54.70 54.80 2. PROGNOSIS: The Hydrometrological Services predicted cloudy to overcast skies with occasional showers and intermittent rain over all regions across Guyana. Occasional outburst of thunder can be expected on the coast and inland areas of region 2 to 6 and 10. Rainfall is expected to be between 0.5mm and 40.0mm today, May 10, 2012. 3. IMPACT: Total loss and the total number of persons affected to date are yet to be determined. 4. AREAS AFFECTED a. Region 1 - BARIMA-WAINI: Nothing further to report. b. Region 2 - POMEROON-SUPENAAM: Nothing further to report. c. Region 3 - ESSEQUIBO ISLANDS-WEST DEMERARA (1) The water level in the Boarasirie conservancy remains critical at 61.50 GD. Additionally, it was reported that the communities of Uniform, Cane Field, Clairmont in Leguan were inundated with approximately 12 inches of water and Wallers’ Delight on the West Coast and Goed Fortuin on the West Bank Demerara with about 2 inches. (2) However, no further information was available with regards the breaches at Stanleytown and Leguan. d. Region 4 - DEMERARA-MAHAICA: Nothing further to report. One people. Prepared. Protected. e. Region 5 - MAHAICA-BERBICE: Nothing further to report. f. Region 6 - EAST BERBICE-CORENTYNE (1) The flood water continues to recede in the affected areas. Details on the severity of the flooding in this region are remains unavailable. (2) The RDC reported that the pump at the Ordnance-Fortlands NDC is unserviceable. It was also reported that the sluice at Liverpool remains silted however, an excavator was deployed and work has commenced to clear the Liverpool outfall. Kilmarnock sluice is still to be repaired. (3) There were reports of damages to livestock, rice crops and cash crop in the Black Bush Polder NDC. g. Region 7 - CUYUNI- MAZARUNI: Nothing further to report. h. Region 8 - POTARO-SIPARUNI: Regional Executive Officer reported flooding in Chenapowu where seven (7) houses remains inundated in this region. Itabac, Kopinang and Monkey Mountain are reported to have high water. No report on the intensity is available. i. Region 9 - UPPER TAKUTU-UPPER ESSEQUIBO (1) The Regional Executive Officer reported that a Meeting was held on May 10, where a Regional Disaster Preparedness Committee was established to monitor the flood situation. Members of the committee were divided further into smaller committees viz Logistics, Communication, Shelter Management and Administration. 1 (2) It was reported that the water is rising at 1 /4 inches per hour in the Lethem area. It is envisage at this rate one of the GWI station will be shut down within the next 12 hours of the reporting time. Six (6) families were evacuated from Tabatinga and Culvert City. Sand Creek water is receded at approximately 1 inch per hour. (3) At Aranaputa in Annai three (3) houses are inundated, the families were evacuated to higher grounds. Further, it was reported that in Central 1 Lethem the water level is rising /2 inch per hour and is a threat to the GT&T building. GT&T presently working on buffers around it site. Cell phone services have not been affected. (4) GWI Station #2 is dependent on Lethem Power Company for power. A standby generator is to be sourced and move to site in the event of a Lethem Power Company shut down. (5) The approaches at Lethem/St Ignatius Bridge are inundated, and vehicles approaching from South Rupununi cannot traverse the Burro Bridge and approaches to the Kumu Bridge. The four (4) bridges and the access roads to Karasabai remain flooded and impassable to vehicles. Additionally, the Sari Sari Bridge at Toka and Surama Junction remain a threat to heavy vehicles. (5) The water level in the Takutu and Ireng Rivers continues to rise. J. Region 10- UPPER DEMERARA-BERBICE: Nothing further to report. 2 5. PUBLIC BUILDINGS UPDATE: No reports are available. 6. ACTIONS BY THE CIVIL DEFENCE COMMISSION : The Commission continues to monitor and assess the vulnerable communities and conservancies which are usually affected by the heavy rains. 7. ACTION BY OTHER ORGANISATIONS a. Ministry of Health: Assessments of all the affected areas are being conducted. b. Ministry of Agriculture: Assessments of all the affected areas are being conducted and representatives from the National Drainage and Irrigation Authority continue to monitor the pumps, sluices and conservancies in all the affected regions. c. Guysuco: Nothing to report. 8. NEEDS: The Commission has identified the following immediate needs: a. Damage Assessments to be conducted to identify and quantify the extent of the flooding in the regions. b. Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping of all the affected communities to determine the water level and to assist in decision making. 9. NATIONAL EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTRE (NEOC) Contact Information: a. Address: Civil Defence Commission, Thomas Road, Thomas Lands, Georgetown. b. Telephone No: (592) 226-1114, 226-8815, 226-1027 or 225-5847 24 Hours No: (592) 600-3000 c. FAX: (592) 225-0486 d. Email: [email protected], [email protected] 3 .
Recommended publications
  • Type of Agricultural
    Documentof The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized ReportNo: 18018-GUA PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT Public Disclosure Authorized ONA PROPOSED CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 6.8 MILLION (US$9 MILLION EQUIVALENT) TO THE CO-OPERATIVE REPUBLIC OF GUYANA FOR AN Public Disclosure Authorized EL NINO EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROJECT September 29, 1998 Public Disclosure Authorized Finance,Private Sector Development and InfrastructureSMU Caribbean CMU Latin Americaand the CaribbeanRegion CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Exchange Rate Effective: September 14, 1998 Currency Unit = Guyana D)ollar US$1.00 = G$162 FISCAL YEAR January 1 - December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND AClRONYMS CAS Country Assistance Strategy CDC Civil Defense Commission CTB Central Tender Board ENSO El Ninfo Southern Oscillation ESAF Extended Structural Adjustment Facility GOG Government of Guyana GS&WC Georgetown Sewerage and Water Commissioners GUYWA Guyana Water Authority RD Hydrometeorological Division MOA Ministry of Agriculture MOF Ministry of Finance MOH&W Ministry of Housing and Water MOW Ministry of Works NDIB National Drainage and Irrigation Board PCU Project Coordinating Unit PEU Project Executing Unit SIMAP Social Impact Amelioration Program Vice President: Shahid Javed Burki Country Director: Orsalia Kalantzopoulos Sector Director: Danny M. Leipziger Task Team Leader: Thakoor Persaud GUYANA El NifioEmergency Assistance Project CONTENTS A. Project DevelopmentObjective 1. Project development objective ............................................................... 2 2. Key performance indicators
    [Show full text]
  • Guyana: Unspoiled Wilderness | Species List January 30 – February 11, 2020 | Compiled by Dave Mehlman
    Guyana: Unspoiled Wilderness | Species List January 30 – February 11, 2020 | Compiled by Dave Mehlman With guides Ron Allicock and Dave Mehlman and 8 participants: David, Joan, Judy, Livia, Nate, Robert, Robin, and Steve (HO) = Distinctive enough to be counted as heard only (GO) = Seen by guides only (I) = Introduced Sites visited: Cara Lodge Hotel, Georgetown Botanical Garden, Mahaica River, Ogle Seawall, Kaieteur Falls, Surama Ecolodge, MYC Camp, Harpy Eagle Trail, Surama entrance road, Burro-Burro River Trail, Atta Rainforest Lodge & Canopy Walkway, Atta Cock-of-the-Rock lek, Atta White Sand Forest, Caiman House Lodge, Rupununi River, Karasabai, Manari Ranch, and Takatu River. Summary: 321 species of birds, 6 species of mammals, 5 species of reptiles and amphibians, 9 species of notable insects, and 1 species of fish positively identified. BIRDS (321 species recorded, of which 7 were heard only and 12 seen by guides only): TINAMOUS (Tinamidae) (2) Little Tinamou (Crypturellus soui): (HO), heard on both full days near Surama. Undulated Tinamou (Crypturellus undulatus): heard and seen by a few on the Rupununi River boat trip. DUCKS, GEESE AND SWANS (Anatidae) (4) White-faced Whistling-Duck (Dendrocygna viduata): seen, primarily at a distance and while flying, on the way to and around the savannas at Caiman House. Black-bellied Whistling-Duck (Dendrocygna autumnalis): small group observed in wetland on way to Narish’s house for Mahaica River boat trip. Muscovy Duck (Cairina moschata): seen at different places on 4 days, mostly small groups flying. White-cheeked Pintail (Anas bahamensis): at least 2 found at a distance at the Ogle Seawall (a lifer for Ron!).
    [Show full text]
  • Lisa K. Grund Phd Thesis
    AASENÎKON! MAKUSHI TRAVELOGUES FROM THE BORDERLANDS OF SOUTHERN GUYANA Lisa Katharina Grund A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2017 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/12167 This item is protected by original copyright This item is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence Aasenîkon! Makushi Travelogues from the Borderlands of Southern Guyana Lisa Katharina Grund Abstract This ethnographic account focuses on the conceptions and practices of movement, as narrated by the Makushi people who live along the triple frontier of southern Guyana. The journeys - individual experiences, in particular of women – depict visits to other Makushi communities, to their neighbours and cities in Guyana, Brazil and Venezuela. The travelogues disclose Makushi premises on knowledge and its acquisition: gender, age, temporality and alterity. Exploring these concepts in practice, the ethnography points out the value the Makushi attribute to their encounters with others, situations in which risk and unpredictability are creatively incorporated as part of their sociality. 3 Contents Acknowledgements 10 Introduction 12 Mobility in the Guianas 15 On Movement 18 Feminine voices 23 Fieldwork 24 The terminology of travel 26 Outline of chapters 28 Chapter 1 – Roads and Crossings: Experiences of Movement 30 The road 31 A line between poles 31 Through a line of
    [Show full text]
  • ENVIRONMENTAL CLUBS MAKUSHI YOUTH North
    Running head: ENVIRONMENTAL CLUBS MAKUSHI YOUTH North Rupununi Wildlife Clubs: Makushi Amerindians’ Perceptions of Environmental Education and Positive Youth Development in Guyana Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Presented to the Faculty of Education University of Ottawa 20 June 2016 Ph.D. Candidate: Julie Comber Director: Dr. Bernard W. Andrews Thesis Committee Members: Dr. Richard Maclure Dr. Nicholas Ng-A-Fook Dr. Giuliano Reis External Examiner: Dr. Lisa Taylor ©Julie Comber, Ottawa, Canada, 2016 ENVIRONMENTAL CLUBS MAKUSHI YOUTH II Abstract This doctoral research studied the North Rupununi Wildlife Clubs (NRWC), an Environmental Education (EE) Program for Makushi Amerindian youth in Guyana. The Club format for EE has become popular, and previous research on EE Club programs provide modest support for the hypothesis that EE Club membership increases pro-environmental attitudes and behaviour in children and youth. There is also increasing interest in the role EE Clubs can play in nurturing Positive Youth Development (PYD). This multi-site case study describes EE Clubs in three villages in the North Rupununi of Guyana. Data was collected from semi-structured interviews and focus groups with stakeholders (such as former Club members, volunteers with the Clubs, Elders, and village leaders). The researcher also kept a reflective journal. Findings suggest community members valued the positive impact they perceived participation in NRWC to have on youth and upon their community. Participants offered recommendations on how to improve the program. One of the original findings is that the Clubs may be a way to help reconnect indigenous youth with their elders and restore the transmission of Indigenous Knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Guyana Education Sector Improvement Project Public Disclosure Authorized
    SFG2984 Guyana Education Sector Improvement Project Public Disclosure Authorized Indigenous Peoples Plan Public Disclosure Authorized Ministry of Education Public Disclosure Authorized Government of Guyana February 4, 2017 Public Disclosure Authorized 1 Table of Contents 1) Project Objective and Description .............................................................................................................. 3 2) Legal and Institutional Framework Applicable to Indigenous Peoples and Education .............................. 4 3) Baseline Socio-Economic Information ....................................................................................................... 6 4) A Summary of the Social Assessment ........................................................................................................ 7 5) Results of the free, prior, and informed consultation with affected Indigenous communities and that led to broad community support for the project ....................................................................................................... 8 6) A framework for ensuring free, prior, and informed consultation with the affected Indigenous communities during project implementation .................................................................................................... 10 7) Action Plan to Ensure that Indigenous Communities Receive Social and Economic Benefits ................ 11 8) Mitigation of Adverse Impacts ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICIAL LIST of ELECTORS District: 9 UPPER TAKUTU/UPPER ESSEQUIBO
    OFFICIAL LIST OF ELECTORS District: 9 UPPER TAKUTU/UPPER ESSEQUIBO Date Of Issue: Monday, July 24, 2006 Page 1 of 390 OFFICIAL LIST OF ELECTORS District: 9 UPPER TAKUTU/UPPER ESSEQUIBO Division Name: ARAWAN-POWUA/BAIEWAU Division No.: 911112 Description: THIS DIVISION EXTENDS FROM THE UPSTREAM WATERSHED BETWEEN THE TRIBUTARIES OF THE TAKUTU RIVER AND THE SKABUNK RIVER, A RIGHT BANK TRIBUTARY OF THE TAKUTU RIVER, APPROXIMATELY 1 MILE DOWN STREAM OF THE ARAWANA FALLS, AT ITS NORTHERN EXTREMITY, TO THE DOWNSTREAM WATERSHED BETWEEN THE TRIBUTARIES OF THE TAKUTU RIVER AND THE RAADWAU RIVER, A RIGHT BANK TRIBUTARY OF THE THE TAKUTU RIVER,AT ITS SOUTHERN EXTREMITY , AND FROM AN IMAGINARY LINE ALONG THE WESTERN EXTREMITY OF SAWARIWAU AMERINDIAN VILLAGE FROM THE TALWEG OF THE PINNIYET RIVER AT ITS SOURCE TO THE WATERSHED AT THE TOP OF THE PINNIYET MOUNTAIN AND THE WATERSHED BETWEEN THE TRIBUTARIES OF THE RUPUNUNI AND TAKUTU RIVERS, AT ITS EASTERN EXTREMITY TO THE COMMON BOUNDARY BETWEEN GUYANA AND BRAZIL, ALONG THE TAKUTU RIVER AT ITS WESTERN EXTREMITY. Date Of Issue: Monday, July 24, 2006 Page 2 of 390 OFFICIAL LIST OF ELECTORS District9 Division Number: 911112 Division Name: ARAWAN-POWUA/BAIEWAU No. Surname First Name Middle Name Address Occupation MRC No. 1 ALBERT CARMEN TAWARU SOUTH RUPUNUNIHOUSEWIFE 1599688 2 ALBERT CLEONIS MICHAEL KAITUER ARAWAN-POWUA / FARMER 2137902 BAIEWAU 3 ALBERT CLETUS SMALL SAND CREEKFARMER 1599513 4 ALBERT ERMALINDA KAITUER ARAWAN- HOUSEWIFE 2137905 POWAU/BAIEWAU 5 ALBERT GERALD FRANCIS DOG HILL SOUTH RUPUNUNI FARMER
    [Show full text]
  • Guyana National Report - English
    United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/35/GUY/1 General Assembly Distr.: General 10 January 2020 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Thirty-fifth session 20–31 January 2020 National report submitted in accordance with paragraph 5 of the annex to Human Rights Council resolution 16/21* Guyana * The present document has been reproduced as received. Its content does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations. GE.19-18019(E) A/HRC/WG.6/35/GUY/1 Introduction 1. Guyana considers the UPR as a beneficial process in engaging with other States to review and constructively assess its progress in recognizing and protecting fundamental rights and freedoms on its domestic plane. To this end, Guyana welcomes the third cycle of UPR and is pleased to present its national report for the period under review. Guyana confirms its continued commitment to this process. 2. Since the presentation of its report to the 2nd UPR, Guyanese have undergone historical political changes including the election of a coalition government immediately following a 23-year rule of the Peoples Progressive Party/Civic political party. Political history marched on when on 21st December, 2018, the coalition government lost a vote of no-confidence at the 111th sitting of the National Assembly. Having fully employed the judicial system to define the Constitutional requirements as the political system entered unchartered waters, General Elections have now been fixed for 2nd March, 2020. 3. In the midst of the exciting political developments, Guyana has remained firm in its commitment to ensure the continued and progressive enjoyment and protection of citizens’ human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT by the AMER.INDIAN LANDS COMMISSION
    GUYANA REPORT by the AMER.INDIAN LANDS COMMISSION AUGUST, 1969 Allerindi�n Lands Commission, 105 New Garden Street, Queenstown, Georgetown, Guyana, TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Par,agaphs � PART I Terms of Reference 6 - 7 2 Procedure adopted 8 - 23 3 Brief Geographical Note 24 - 29 8 Brief Historical Note 30 - 51 9 Interpretation of 'Amerindian• 52 - 60 17 Tribal Distribution 61 - 66 20 Freedons and Permissions 67 - 76 20 Land Use 77 - 86 25 INDUSTRI ES 1. .Agriculture 87 - 100 29 2. Cattle 101 - 128 33 3. Timber 129 - 139 41 4. Balata 140 44 5. Mining 141 - 144 44 Entitl enent 145 - 160 46 Local Government 161 - 172 53 Social Services 1. Education 173 - 179 57 2. Cor:1t1unity Developnent 180 - 182 59 3. Health 183 - 188 60 Integration 189 - 205 62 Legislation 206 67 Sw:imary of General Recornnendations 68 fl.RT II - SPECIFIC RECOMMEND.i\.TIONS General Remarks 207 - 220 71 1. W�]2ishana Cor:1I!lunities: ) 221 - 230 74 ) Achiwib: Karaudanawa ) Af.shalton: Awariwaunau ) ) 77 Mururanau: Shea ) Sand Creek: Sawariwau ) Potarinau. ) Paragraphs 2. Macusi Co:mnunities: 231 - 241 94 ) Shµlinab: St. Ignatius ) Moco-Moco: Nappi: Parishara ) ) Yupukari: Massara ) Annai: Toka ) 97 ) Ya.karinta: Aranaputa ) Karasabai: Taruka ) Kanapang: Itabac. ) 242 - 249 115 3. Patruaona Communities: ) Monkey Mountain: Kato ) Farama.katoi: Kurukabaru ) ) 117 Kopinang: Waipa & Sandhill ) Kaibarupai: Ka.mana ) Chenapau: Maikwak ) Mahdia-Kangaruma: Tunatunari � .Akawaio-.Arekuna Communities 250 - 258 130 ) Kamarang Keng: Wara!!ladon ) Jawalla: Morowta ) Phillippai,
    [Show full text]
  • By Benjamin Palmer Fry
    Navigating the complexities of Community Monitoring, Reporting and Verification (CMRV) By Benjamin Palmer Fry A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of London /Imperial College London April 2014 Centre for Environmental Policy Imperial College London South Kensington London SW7 2AZ 1 Abstract Under REDD+, the UNFCCC’s financial tool for the preservation of the world’s tropical forests, the necessity to monitor performance as well as involve local people is made clear in the policy documentation. Community Monitoring Reporting and Verification (CMRV) combines these two policy needs to create a concept that delegates the responsibility of ground-level monitoring to local communities. This is a deeply complicated model to implement, balancing local, national, and international needs, incorporating divergent stakeholder opinions, as well as livelihood issues, political dynamics, natural resource management and systemic change. Within this field, I identified three research areas, namely how CMRV fits into the REDD+ MRV policy context, how local people might engage with social, or ‘wellbeing’ monitoring, and the sustainability of CMRV as a local and national institution. There are only a handful of CMRV projects occurring throughout the world, building on the foundations created by locally-based monitoring, and I have been involved in facilitating CMRV in the North Rupununi region of Guyana with traditional Makushi Amerindian communities. This provides the study site for a number of the research chapters. The thesis starts by reviewing how CMRV might synergise with REDD+, particularly looking at the pros and cons of using local people instead of professional scientists for monitoring tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Tourism Enterprise Development in the Rupununi a Blueprint
    Community Tourism Enterprise Development in the Rupununi A Blueprint Conservation International Guyana 2010 ©Conservation International Foundation Guyana Inc., April 2010 Conservation International Foundation Guyana Inc. is a not-for-profit Non-Governmental Organization working in Guyana for more than 20 years linking human development with the conservation of the earth’s living natural heritage. The Mission of the organization is: “Building upon a strong foundation of science, partnership and field demonstration, CI empowers societies to responsibly and sustainably care for nature, our global biodiversity, for the well-being of humanity.” Cover photo by Eduardo Nycander Funding for the preparation of this document was provided by the Inter-American Development Bank. This document is funded in part by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. Community Tourism Enterprise Development in the Rupununi A Blueprint Contributors Eduardo Nycander Chuck Hutchinson Judy Karwacki Vibert Welch Curtis Bernard Gillian Albert April 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Figures iv Lists of Tables v List of Acronyms vi Acknowledgements vii Foreword vii Executive Summary 1 Section 1: Introduction 3 1.1 Sustainable Tourism – A necessary and Integral Part of Guyana‟s Green Economy 5 1.2 Trends in Tourism Today 5 1.3 Guyana Tourism Trends 7 1.4 Competitive Destinations 9 1.5 Tourism as a Sustainable Community Development tool 10 1.6 Community Participation 10 1.7 Education and Interpretation 11 Section 2: Community Profiles 12 2.1 Surama 15 2.2 Rewa 17 2.3 Nappi
    [Show full text]
  • R-Package) Georgetown, 3 August 2020 (Revised: 9 Nov 2020; 11 & 24 Dec 2020; 7 March 2021)
    Guyana REDD+ Readiness Package (R-Package) Georgetown, 3 August 2020 (Revised: 9 Nov 2020; 11 & 24 Dec 2020; 7 March 2021) Page 2 of 139 List of acronyms and abbreviations CIFOR: International Centre for Forestry Research COP: Conference of the Parties EPA: Environmental Protection Agency ER: Emissions Reduction ESMF: Environment and Social Management Framework FCMS: Forest Carbon Monitoring System FCPF: Forest Carbon Partnership Facility FRL: Forest Reference Level GCF: Green Climate Fund GFC: Guyana Forestry Commission GHG: Green House Gas GLSC: Guyana Lands and Surveys Commission GPC/LULUCF: Good Practice Guidance/Land Use, Land Use Change, and Forestry GRIF: Guyana REDD+ Investment Fund GRM: Grievance and Redress Mechanism GSDS: Green State Development Strategy HFLD: High Forest Low Deforestation (country) IDB: Inter-American Development Bank IPCC:: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Iwokrama: Iwokrama International Centre for Rain forest Conservation and Development JCN: Joint Conept Note LCDS: Low Carbon Development Strategy MNR: Ministry of Natural Resources MoA: Ministry of Agriculture MoF: Ministry of Finance MoIPA: Ministry of Indigenous Peoples Affairs MRVS: Monitoring, Reporting and Verification System MSSC: Multi-Stakeholder Steering Committee NCCC: National Climate Change Committee NDC: Nationall Determined Contributions Page 3 of 139 NFMS: National Forest Management System NREAC: Natural Resources and Environment Advisory Committee NSCCFO: National Steering Committee of Community Forest Organisations NTC: National
    [Show full text]
  • Source: Adapted from Gazetteer of Guyana, Published by Lands and Surveys Department and the German Agency for Technical Cooperation, Georgetown, 2001)
    PLACE NAMES ALONG GUYANA’S ROADS (Source: Adapted from Gazetteer of Guyana, published by Lands and Surveys Department and the German Agency for Technical Cooperation, Georgetown, 2001) 1. ESSEQUIBO COAST ROAD Northwards from Supenaam River Place Name Kilometres Miles Supenaam River 0 0 Good Hope 1 0.6 Spring Garden 2.5 1.6 Good Intent 3.5 2.2 Aurora 4 2.5 Makeshift 5.5 3.4 Warousi 6 3.7 Three Friends 6.5 4 Dryshore 6.6 4 Hibernia 7 4.4 Fairfield 8 5 Vilvoorden 9 5.6 Middlesex 10 6.2 Huis T’Dieren 10.5 6.5 Pomona 11.5 7.1 Ituribisi River 12 7.5 Riverstown 12.5 7.8 Adventure 14.5 9 Onderneeming 16.5 10.3 Belfield 18 11.2 Maria’s Lodge 18 11.2 Johanna Cecelia 19 11.8 Zorg 20 12.4 Golden Fleece 21 13 Perserverance 22 13.7 Wastelands 22.5 14 Bremen 23 14.3 Cullen 23.5 14.6 Unu River 24 14.9 Abram’s Zuil 24 14.9 Annandale 24 15.5 Zorg en Vlygt 25.5 15.8 Hoff van Aurich 26 16.2 L’Union 27 16.8 Degeraad 27.5 17.1 Queenstown 28 17.4 1 Mocha 28 17.4 Westfield 28.5 17.7 Alliance 29 18 Taymouth Manor 29.5 18.3 Affiance 30.5 18.9 Columbia 31 19.3 Aberdeen 31.5 19.6 Three Friends 32 19.9 Land of Plenty 32.5 20.2 Mainstay 33 20.5 Reliance 34 21.1 Bush Lot 34.5 21.4 Anna Regina 35.5 22.1 Henrietta 36.5 22.7 Richmond 37 23 La Belle Alliance 38 23.6 Lima 38.5 23.9 Coffee Grove 39.5 24.5 Danielstown 40 24.8 Fear Not 40 24.8 Sparta 40.5 25.2 Cape Batave 41 25.5 Windsor Castle 41 25.5 Hampton Court 42 26.1 Devonshire Castle 43.5 27 Walton Hall 44.5 27.6 Paradise 45 28 The Jib 46 28.6 Exmouth 46.5 28.9 Eliza 47 29.2 Dunkeld and Perth 48 29.8 Dartmouth 48.5 30.1 Westbury 49.5 30.7 Bounty Hall 50 31 Phillips 50.5 31.4 Chandler 51.5 32 Better Success 51.5 32 Andrews 51.5 32 Better Hope 52.5 32.6 La Resource 54 33.5 Maria’s Delight 55 34.2 Opposite 55.5 34.5 Evergreen 56.5 35.1 Somerset - Berks Canal 57 35.4 Berks 57 35.4 2 Somerset 57.5 35.7 Amazon 61 37.9 Charity 61 37.9 Charity Jetty 61.5 38.2 Pomeroon River 61.5 38.2 2.
    [Show full text]