DOCSLIB.ORG

DSA) Reviews Design Conformance with CBSC Chapter 11 for Accessibility Requirements

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

32 00 00 - Exterior Improvements Division of State Architect (DSA) reviews design conformance with CBSC Chapter 11 for accessibility requirements. There are differences between this code and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The design professional is required to provide compliance to both the CBSC and the ADA. The University is accountable for compliance to both the ADA and the CBSC accessibility requirements. Drawings describing accessibility requirements provide the DSA reviewer with information that shows compliance to the provisions of CBSC Chapter 11B, as well as other related requirements applied to the project from federal and local agencies. When required, at least one accessible route shall be provided from public transportation stops, accessible parking and accessible passenger loading zones, and public streets or sidewalks to the accessible building entrance they serve. When applicable, at least one accessible route shall connect accessible buildings, facilities, elements, and spaces that are on the same site. The accessible route shall coincide, to the maximum extent feasible, with the approved main campus circulation routes. 32 01 90 - Operation and Maintenance of Planting Planting Guarantee: During the Guarantee to Repair Period specified in the General Conditions the Contractor shall be liable for damages to all trees covered by the provisions of this Section. Compensation to the University shall be as outlined below. Contractor will not be held responsible for damages due to vandalism or freak acts of nature during the guarantee period. Immediately report such conditions to the University's Representative. Protection and Preservation Procedures On any site survey map, all trees should be identified whose root systems are likely to be impacted by construction equipment, staging areas, proposed walks and roads, utility corridors, and any cut or fill activities. A tree protection zone (TPZ) shall be established to encompass the critical root zone (CRZ) and maintained for all trees to be preserved in a construction site. TPZ should be determined by the tree size, health, how the species responds to construction damage, and should be adjusted according to specific tree and site factors; calculated as 1.50’x the diameter at breast height (DBH) of the tree in inches. For example, a healthy California black walnut with a 30” diameter. = 1.50’ X 30” = 45’ radius TPZ. At no time should the TPZ be less than a radius of 6’. The TPZ must be clearly identified as an exclusion zone, where construction and equipment use is prohibited, and must be fenced before demolition to avoid damage. A barrier shall be constructed for each tree or grouping of trees to protect the trunk and root systems. Chain link 6’ fencing shall be the approved barrier material. No root raking shall be allowed within any tree protection zone at any time during clearing, grading, or construction of a project. No equipment or vehicle shall be parked or construction material stored, or substances poured or disposed of or placed within any tree protection zone at any time during clearing or construction of a project. Vigilance is required to protect trees on construction sites. Monitoring of tree health during and after construction on a regular, frequent basis shall apply to all trees intended for preservation. Monitoring shall be executed by a registered arborist or appointee and shall include watching for signs of tree stress, such as dieback, leaf loss, or general decline in tree health or appearance. Pruning Materials • Pruning materials shall be in accordance with current horticultural practices. • Pruning sterilant shall be Physan 20 Fertilome Type A, or diluted bleach. Fencing Fencing Materials: 11-gauge galvanized 6' high chain-link fence with galvanized steel posts at 10' o.c. minimum. A continuous 6' high temporary chain-link fence will be erected around trees with a caliper of 4" or larger at the dripline, in order to prevent soil compaction, limb damage, or the accidental introduction of toxic materials into the root zone. Fence can be erected around groups of adjacent trees where possible. Otherwise, fence to be erected around individual tree. The fence will be removed only at the end of construction, as approved by the University's Representative. Plant Material Protection: Provide protection for all plant materials designated to be retained. Contractor is responsible for replacing damaged plant life with approved equivalent. New and existing plant materials shall not be allowed to deteriorate and shall be maintained in a healthy and vigorous condition during the course of construction and maintenance period. During the course of construction the Contractor shall take all necessary precautions, as outlined herein, to protect existing plant materials to be preserved from injury and death. Protection shall be given to the roots, trunk, and foliage. The Contractor shall conduct operations continually to completion, unless weather conditions are prohibitive. Provide ample water supply of potable quality and sufficient quantity for all operations required under this Section. Trees subject to the provisions of this Section, which have been injured shall be repaired immediately by a certified Arborist. Repairs shall include removal of rough edges, sprung bark and severely injured branches as directed by the Arborist. Necessary measures shall be taken to maintain healthy living conditions for existing plant materials to be preserved. Such measures shall include monthly washing of leaves for the removal of dust, regular irrigation, root feeding, etc. Tree protection fencing shall be installed for the protection of existing trees to be preserved. No construction, demolition, or work of any nature will be allowed within the fenced area without prior written approval by the University's Representative. • Approval by the University's Representative for work within the fenced area shall not release the Contractor from any of the provisions specified herein for the protection of existing trees to be preserved. • During the course of construction of approved work within the fence area, no roots shall be cut without prior written approval by the University's Representative. During construction, the existing site surface drainage patterns shall not be altered within the area of the drip line of existing plant materials. Contractor shall not alter the existing water table within the area of the drip line of existing plant materials. Do not permit the following within the drip line of any existing tree or shrub to be preserved: • Storage or parking of automobiles or other vehicles. • Stockpiling of building materials, refuse or excavated materials. • Skinning or bruising of bark. • Use of trees as support posts, power poles, or signposts; anchorage for ropes, guy wires, or power lines; or other similar functions. • Dumping of poisonous materials on or around plant materials and roots. Such materials include but are not limited to paint, petroleum products, dirty water, or other deleterious materials. • Cutting roots by utility trenching, foundation digging; placement of curbs and trenches, and other miscellaneous excavation without prior written approval by the University's Representative. • Damage to the trunk, limbs, or foliage caused by maneuvering vehicles or stacking material or equipment to close to the plant. • Compaction of the root area by movement of trucks or grading machines; storage of equipment, gravel, earth fill, or construction supplies; etc. • Excessive water or heat from equipment, utility line construction, or burning of trash under or near shrubs or trees. • Damage to root system from flooding, erosion, and excessive wetting and drying resulting from watering and other operations. Excavation around trees • Excavation within the drip lines of trees shall be done only where absolutely necessary, under the direction of a Certified Arborist and with prior approval from the University's Representative. • Where trenching for utilities is required within drip lines, tunneling under and around roots shall be by hand digging. Main lateral roots and taproots shall not be cut. Smaller roots that interfere with installation of new work may be cut with prior approval from certified Arborist. • Where excavation of new construction is required within drip line of trees, hand excavation shall be employed to minimize damage to root system. Roots shall be relocated in backfill areas wherever possible. If large, main lateral roots are encountered, they shall be exposed beyond excavation limits as required to bend, and relocate without breaking. If encountered immediately adjacent to location of new construction and relocation is not practical, roots shall be cut approximately 6 inches back from new construction under the direction of a certified Arborist. • Exposed roots shall not be allowed to dry out before permanent backfill is placed. Temporary earth cover shall be provided, or roots shall be packed with wet peat moss or four layers of wet, untreated burlap and temporarily supported and protected from damage until permanently relocated and covered with backfill. The cover over the roots shall be wetted to the point of runoff daily. • Branching structure shall be thinned in accordance with National Arborists Association "Pruning Standards and Principles" to balance loss of root system caused by damage or cutting of root system. Thinning shall not exceed 30 percent of existing branching structure. Tree Trimming A Certified Arborist, shall
Recommended publications
  • Will Climate Change, Genetic and Demographic Variation Or Rat Predation Pose the Greatest Risk for Persistence of an Altitudinally Distributed Island Endemic?

    Will Climate Change, Genetic and Demographic Variation Or Rat Predation Pose the Greatest Risk for Persistence of an Altitudinally Distributed Island Endemic?

    Biology 2012, 1, 736-765; doi:10.3390/biology1030736 OPEN ACCESS biology ISSN 2079-7737 www.mdpi.com/journal/biology Article Will Climate Change, Genetic and Demographic Variation or Rat Predation Pose the Greatest Risk for Persistence of an Altitudinally Distributed Island Endemic? Catherine Laura Simmons 1, Tony D. Auld 2, Ian Hutton 3, William J. Baker 4 and Alison Shapcott 1,* 1 Faculty of Science Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, QLD 4558, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Office of Environment and Heritage (NSW), P.O. Box 1967 Hurstville, NSW 2220, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 P.O. Box 157, Lord Howe Island, NSW 2898, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected] 4 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AB, UK; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-7-5430-1211; Fax: +61-7-5430-2881. Received: 3 September 2012; in revised form: 29 October 2012 / Accepted: 16 November 2012 / Published: 23 November 2012 Abstract: Species endemic to mountains on oceanic islands are subject to a number of existing threats (in particular, invasive species) along with the impacts of a rapidly changing climate. The Lord Howe Island endemic palm Hedyscepe canterburyana is restricted to two mountains above 300 m altitude. Predation by the introduced Black Rat (Rattus rattus) is known to significantly reduce seedling recruitment. We examined the variation in Hedyscepe in terms of genetic variation, morphology, reproductive output and demographic structure, across an altitudinal gradient.
  • Studies on Phytoconstituents, in Vitro Antioxidant and Cytotoxity Activity of Harpullia Arborea Bark Extracts on Human Epidermoid Larynx Carcinoma Cell Line (Hep-2) R

    Studies on Phytoconstituents, in Vitro Antioxidant and Cytotoxity Activity of Harpullia Arborea Bark Extracts on Human Epidermoid Larynx Carcinoma Cell Line (Hep-2) R

    The International journal of analytical and experimental modal analysis ISSN NO: 0886-9367 Studies on Phytoconstituents, In vitro Antioxidant and Cytotoxity Activity of Harpullia arborea Bark Extracts on Human Epidermoid Larynx Carcinoma Cell Line (HEp-2) R. Rajeswari1, S. Murugesh1*, D. Jegadeeshkumar2, B. Prakash3, V. Vinoth kumar4 1Department of Botany, School of Life Sciences, Periyar University, Periyar Palkalai Nagar, Salem-636 011, Tamil Nadu, India. 2Chromopark Research Centre, Namakkal - 637001 Tamil Nadu, India. 3Department of Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Vels Institute of Science Technology & Advanced Studies, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 4Department of Microbiology, Sree Narayana Guru College, Coimbatore-641105, India. *Corresponding Author Email: [email protected] Phone: +91 9943364913 ORCID: 0000-0002-8382-8553 Abstract Cancer is major public issues and one of the leading causes of death in prosperous countries. Traditional plants are a valued source of novel cytotoxic agents and are still in performance better role in health concern. In the present study, the bark of methanol and chloroform extracts were subjected to preliminary phytochemicals screening was done using different biochemical tests. Among the 2 solvent extracts, methanol showed the highest number of phytochemicals, which extract was subjected to in vitro study of antioxidant activity by DPPH method and cytotoxicity activity against HEp-2 cell lines by MTT assay. Furthermore, DNA fragmentation and GCMS analysis were subjected. By the analsyis, following phyto-constituents like tannins, saponins, Steroids, Carbohydrate and Phenols, Flavonoids, Terpenoids, and quinine were observed. The methanol extract was found to be selectively cytotoxic in vitro to HEp-2 cell lines with IC50values was15.6 µg/ml.
  • Brisbane Native Plants by Suburb

    Brisbane Native Plants by Suburb

    INDEX - BRISBANE SUBURBS SPECIES LIST Acacia Ridge. ...........15 Chelmer ...................14 Hamilton. .................10 Mayne. .................25 Pullenvale............... 22 Toowong ....................46 Albion .......................25 Chermside West .11 Hawthorne................. 7 McDowall. ..............6 Torwood .....................47 Alderley ....................45 Clayfield ..................14 Heathwood.... 34. Meeandah.............. 2 Queensport ............32 Trinder Park ...............32 Algester.................... 15 Coopers Plains........32 Hemmant. .................32 Merthyr .................7 Annerley ...................32 Coorparoo ................3 Hendra. .................10 Middle Park .........19 Rainworth. ..............47 Underwood. ................41 Anstead ....................17 Corinda. ..................14 Herston ....................5 Milton ...................46 Ransome. ................32 Upper Brookfield .......23 Archerfield ...............32 Highgate Hill. ........43 Mitchelton ...........45 Red Hill.................... 43 Upper Mt gravatt. .......15 Ascot. .......................36 Darra .......................33 Hill End ..................45 Moggill. .................20 Richlands ................34 Ashgrove. ................26 Deagon ....................2 Holland Park........... 3 Moorooka. ............32 River Hills................ 19 Virginia ........................31 Aspley ......................31 Doboy ......................2 Morningside. .........3 Robertson ................42 Auchenflower
  • Origins and Assembly of Malesian Rainforests

    Origins and Assembly of Malesian Rainforests

    ES50CH06_Kooyman ARjats.cls October 21, 2019 11:31 Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics Origins and Assembly of Malesian Rainforests Robert M. Kooyman,1,2 Robert J. Morley,3,4 Darren M. Crayn,5 Elizabeth M. Joyce,5 Maurizio Rossetto,2 J.W. Ferry Slik,6 Joeri S. Strijk,7,8,9 Ta o S u , 9,10 Jia-Yee S. Yap,2,11 and Peter Wilf12 1Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales 2109, Australia; email: [email protected] 2National Herbarium of New South Wales, Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia 3Palynova UK, Littleport, Cambridgeshire CB6 1PY, United Kingdom 4Earth Sciences Department, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, United Kingdom 5Australian Tropical Herbarium and Centre for Tropical Environmental Sustainability Science, James Cook University, Smithfield, Queensland 4878, Australia 6Environmental and Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong BE1410, Brunei Darussalam 7State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources, College of Forestry, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530005, China 8Alliance for Conservation Tree Genomics, Pha Tad Ke Botanical Garden, 06000 Luang Prabang, Lao PDR 9Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla 666303, China 10Southeast Asia Biodiversity Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yezin, Nay Pyi Taw 05282, Myanmar Access provided by 118.208.177.216 on 11/06/19. For personal use only. 11Queensland Alliance of Agriculture and Food Innovation, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia 12Department of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Annu.
  • How Sympatric Is Speciation in the Howea Palms of Lord Howe Island?

    How Sympatric Is Speciation in the Howea Palms of Lord Howe Island?

    Molecular Ecology (2009) 18, 3629–3638 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04306.x How sympatric is speciation in the Howea palms of Lord Howe Island? WIESŁAW BABIK,*†† ROGER K. BUTLIN,† WILLIAM J. BAKER,‡ ALEXANDER S. T. PAPADOPULOS,* MATTHIEU BOULESTEIX,* MARIE-CHARLOTTE ANSTETT,§ CHRISTIAN LEXER,*– IAN HUTTON** and VINCENT SAVOLAINEN*‡ *Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, UK, †Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK, ‡Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK, §Centre for Evolutionary and Functional Ecology, UMR 5175, 34293 Montpellier cedex 5, France, –University of Fribourg, Department of Biology, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland, **Lord Howe Island, PO Box 157, New South Wales 2898, Australia Abstract The two species of the palm genus Howea (Arecaceae) from Lord Howe Island, a minute volcanic island in the Tasman Sea, are now regarded as one of the most compelling examples of sympatric speciation, although this view is still disputed by some authors. Population genetic and ecological data are necessary to provide a more coherent and comprehensive understanding of this emerging model system. Here, we analyse data on abundance, juvenile recruitment, pollination mode and genetic variation and structure in both species. We find that Howea forsteriana is less abundant than Howea belmoreana. The genetic data based on amplified fragment length polymorphisms markers indicate similar levels of variation in the two species, despite the estimated census population size of H. belmoreana being three times larger than that of H. forsteriana. Genetic structure within species is low although some weak isolation by distance is detectable.
  • Cunninghamia Date of Publication: April 2020 a Journal of Plant Ecology for Eastern Australia

    Cunninghamia Date of Publication: April 2020 a Journal of Plant Ecology for Eastern Australia

    Cunninghamia Date of Publication: April 2020 A journal of plant ecology for eastern Australia ISSN 0727- 9620 (print) • ISSN 2200 - 405X (Online) A Systematic Flora Survey, Floristic Classification and High-Resolution Vegetation Map of Lord Howe Island Paul Sheringham 1*, Peter Richards2, Phil Gilmour3, Jill Smith1 and Ernst Kemmerer 4 1 Department of Planning, Industry and Environment, Locked Bag 914 COFFS HARBOUR NSW 2450 2 17 Coronation Avenue, SAWTELL NSW 2452 3 523 Roses Rd, GLENIFFER, NSW 2454 4 Cradle Coast NRM, PO Box 338, BURNIE TAS 7320 * Author for correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The present study took advantage of the availability of high resolution ADS40 digital imagery to 1) systematically resample the vegetation of the Lord Howe Island Group (LHIG, excluding Ball’s Pyramid); 2) conduct a numerical analysis of the floristic data; 3) map vegetation extent and the distribution of vegetation communities and 4) compare the resultant classification and mapping with those of Pickard (1983). In July 2013, a total of 86 full floristic and 105 rapid floristic sites were sampled across the island, based on a stratified random sampling design. A hierarchical agglomerative clustering strategy (Flexible UPGMA) and Bray-Curtis dissimilarity coefficient with default beta, along with nearest neighbour analysis to identify anomalous site allocations, was used to analyze the floristic data. In total 33 vegetation communities were delineated and mapped: 19 mapping units from the full floristic analysis; 7 variants identified within five of the above 19 groups; 3 mapping units from analysis of canopy- only floristic data; and 4 mapping units recognised in previous studies that are mapped but were not sampled in this survey.
  • Green & Healthy Hawaii: Identifying & Introducing Alternative Ornamental

    Green & Healthy Hawaii: Identifying & Introducing Alternative Ornamental

    Final Report Green & Healthy Hawaii: Identifying & Introducing Alternative Ornamental Landscape Plants in Response to Invasive Species Issues By Dr. Andy Kaufman (PI) Dr. Richard Criley (CO-PI) Dr Linda Cox (CO-PI) Alberto H. Ricordi, M.Sc. (Graduate Assistant) Tropical Landscape and Human Interaction Lab Department of Tropical Plant and Soil Sciences University of Hawaii at Manoa Funded by a grant from: Hawaii Invasive Species Council (HISC) Green & Healthy Hawaii: Identifying & Introducing Alternative Ornamental Landscape Plants in Response to Invasive Species Issues Abstract ........................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 4 Problem statement .......................................................................................................... 6 Objectives ....................................................................................................................... 6 Goals ............................................................................................................................... 7 Materials and Methods .................................................................................................... 7 Selection of Invasive Species ...................................................................................... 9 Selection of Alternative Species ...............................................................................
  • Accepted Manuscript

    Accepted Manuscript

    Accepted Manuscript Plastid and nuclear DNA markers reveal intricate relationships at subfamilial and tribal levels in the soapberry family (Sapindaceae) Sven Buerki, Félix Forest, Pedro Acevedo-Rodríguez, Martin W. Callmander, Johan A.A. Nylander, Mark Harrington, Isabel Sanmartín, Philippe Küpfer, Nadir Alvarez PII: S1055-7903(09)00017-7 DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.01.012 Reference: YMPEV 3130 To appear in: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Received Date: 21 May 2008 Revised Date: 27 November 2008 Accepted Date: 23 January 2009 Please cite this article as: Buerki, S., Forest, F., Acevedo-Rodríguez, P., Callmander, M.W., Nylander, J.A.A., Harrington, M., Sanmartín, I., Küpfer, P., Alvarez, N., Plastid and nuclear DNA markers reveal intricate relationships at subfamilial and tribal levels in the soapberry family (Sapindaceae), Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (2009), doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.01.012 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Buerki et al. 1 1 Plastid and nuclear DNA markers reveal intricate relationships at subfamilial and tribal 2 levels in the soapberry family (Sapindaceae) 3 4 Sven Buerki a,*, Félix Forest b, Pedro Acevedo-Rodríguez c, Martin W. Callmander d,e, 5 Johan A.
  • I Is the Sunda-Sahul Floristic Exchange Ongoing?

    I Is the Sunda-Sahul Floristic Exchange Ongoing?

    Is the Sunda-Sahul floristic exchange ongoing? A study of distributions, functional traits, climate and landscape genomics to investigate the invasion in Australian rainforests By Jia-Yee Samantha Yap Bachelor of Biotechnology Hons. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2018 Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation i Abstract Australian rainforests are of mixed biogeographical histories, resulting from the collision between Sahul (Australia) and Sunda shelves that led to extensive immigration of rainforest lineages with Sunda ancestry to Australia. Although comprehensive fossil records and molecular phylogenies distinguish between the Sunda and Sahul floristic elements, species distributions, functional traits or landscape dynamics have not been used to distinguish between the two elements in the Australian rainforest flora. The overall aim of this study was to investigate both Sunda and Sahul components in the Australian rainforest flora by (1) exploring their continental-wide distributional patterns and observing how functional characteristics and environmental preferences determine these patterns, (2) investigating continental-wide genomic diversities and distances of multiple species and measuring local species accumulation rates across multiple sites to observe whether past biotic exchange left detectable and consistent patterns in the rainforest flora, (3) coupling genomic data and species distribution models of lineages of known Sunda and Sahul ancestry to examine landscape-level dynamics and habitat preferences to relate to the impact of historical processes. First, the continental distributions of rainforest woody representatives that could be ascribed to Sahul (795 species) and Sunda origins (604 species) and their dispersal and persistence characteristics and key functional characteristics (leaf size, fruit size, wood density and maximum height at maturity) of were compared.
  • WRA Species Report

    WRA Species Report

    Family: Arecaceae Taxon: Howea forsteriana Synonym: Common Name Kentia palm Sentry palm Questionaire : current 20090513 Assessor: Chuck Chimera Designation: EVALUATE Status: Assessor Approved Data Entry Person: Chuck Chimera WRA Score 3 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? y=1, n=-1 103 Does the species have weedy races? y=1, n=-1 201 Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If island is primarily wet habitat, then (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2- High substitute "wet tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" high) (See Appendix 2) 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2- High high) (See Appendix 2) 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 n 204 Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or subtropical climates y=1, n=0 y 205 Does the species have a history of repeated introductions outside its natural range? y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 y 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see y Appendix 2), n= question 205 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see n Appendix 2) 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see n Appendix 2) 305 Congeneric weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y=1, n=0 n 402 Allelopathic y=1, n=0 n 403 Parasitic y=1, n=0 n 404 Unpalatable to grazing animals y=1, n=-1 405 Toxic to animals y=1, n=0 n 406 Host for recognized pests and pathogens y=1,
  • (Arecaceae): Évolution Du Système Sexuel Et Du Nombre D'étamines

    (Arecaceae): Évolution Du Système Sexuel Et Du Nombre D'étamines

    Etude de l’appareil reproducteur des palmiers (Arecaceae) : évolution du système sexuel et du nombre d’étamines Elodie Alapetite To cite this version: Elodie Alapetite. Etude de l’appareil reproducteur des palmiers (Arecaceae) : évolution du système sexuel et du nombre d’étamines. Sciences agricoles. Université Paris Sud - Paris XI, 2013. Français. NNT : 2013PA112063. tel-01017166 HAL Id: tel-01017166 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01017166 Submitted on 2 Jul 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. UNIVERSITE PARIS-SUD ÉCOLE DOCTORALE : Sciences du Végétal (ED 45) Laboratoire d'Ecologie, Systématique et E,olution (ESE) DISCIPLINE : -iologie THÈSE DE DOCTORAT SUR TRAVAUX soutenue le ./05/10 2 par Elodie ALAPETITE ETUDE DE L'APPAREIL REPRODUCTEUR DES PAL4IERS (ARECACEAE) : EVOLUTION DU S5STE4E SE6UEL ET DU NO4-RE D'ETA4INES Directeur de thèse : Sophie NADOT Professeur (Uni,ersité Paris-Sud Orsay) Com osition du jury : Rapporteurs : 9ean-5,es DU-UISSON Professeur (Uni,ersité Pierre et 4arie Curie : Paris VI) Porter P. LOWR5 Professeur (4issouri -otanical Garden USA et 4uséum National d'Histoire Naturelle Paris) Examinateurs : Anders S. -ARFOD Professeur (Aarhus Uni,ersity Danemark) Isabelle DA9OA Professeur (Uni,ersité Paris Diderot : Paris VII) 4ichel DRON Professeur (Uni,ersité Paris-Sud Orsay) 3 4 Résumé Les palmiers constituent une famille emblématique de monocotylédones, comprenant 183 genres et environ 2500 espèces distribuées sur tous les continents dans les zones tropicales et subtropicales.
  • Conservation Issues for the Vascular Flora of Lord Howe Island

    Conservation Issues for the Vascular Flora of Lord Howe Island

    490 Cunninghamia 8(4): 2004 Auld & Hutton, Plant conservation on Lord Howe Island Conservation issues for the vascular flora of Lord Howe Island Tony D. Auld1 and Ian Hutton2 1Biodiversity and Conservation Science Section, Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) PO Box 1967 Hurstville NSW 2220, AUSTRALIA Email: [email protected] 2PO Box 157 Lord Howe Island, NSW 2898 AUSTRALIA Abstract: The flora of the Lord Howe Island Group (31°30’S, 159°05’E) comprises a unique mix of elements of Australian, New Zealand and New Caledonian floras. It is significant for its high degree of endemism and for its structural and biological (leaves, flowers, fruit) role in supporting a diverse array of fauna. Conservation of this flora is dependant upon: reducing current habitat degradation (mostly the result of exotic weeds); minimising any future impacts, in particular the effects of climate change on the unique cloud forests of the southern mountains and the continued introduction and spread of weeds and the pathogen Phytophthora cinnamomi. We provide a description of the nature of the major threats to the flora and suggest an area-based scheme, focussed on the relative conservation significance of remaining vegetation, as a mechanism for developing priorities for threat mitigation activities. While a number of threat control works are in place, eg. weed control, some re-emphasis is needed. In addition, some new initiatives are required including: reducing the rate of introductions of new exotics; a system to remove potential environmental weeds from the settlement area; phytosanitary guidelines; pathogen quarantine measures; search and removal of environmental weeds from remote areas; and ex situ initiatives for plant species restricted to the cloud forests of the southern mountains.