Early Microbial Evolution: the Age of Anaerobes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Early Microbial Evolution: the Age of Anaerobes Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on October 6, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Early Microbial Evolution: The Age of Anaerobes William F. Martin and Filipa L. Sousa Institute for Molecular Evolution, University of Du¨sseldorf, 40225 Du¨sseldorf, Germany Correspondence: [email protected] In this article, the term “early microbial evolution” refers to the phase of biological history from the emergence of life to the diversification of the first microbial lineages. In the modern era (since we knew about archaea), three debates have emerged on the subject that deserve discussion: (1) thermophilic origins versus mesophilic origins, (2) autotrophic origins versus heterotrophic origins, and (3) how do eukaryotes figure into early evolution. Here, we revisit those debates from the standpoint of newer data. We also consider the perhaps more pressing issue that molecular phylogenies need to recover anaerobic lineages at the base of prokary- otic trees, because O2 is a product of biological evolution; hence, the first microbes had to be anaerobes. If molecular phylogenies do not recover anaerobes basal, something is wrong. Among the anaerobes, hydrogen-dependent autotrophs—acetogens and methanogens— look like good candidates for the ancestral state of physiology in the bacteria and archaea, respectively. New trees tend to indicate that eukaryote cytosolic ribosomes branch within their archaeal homologs, not as sisters to them and, furthermore tend to root archaea within the methanogens. These are major changes in the tree of life, and open up new avenues of thought. Geochemical methane synthesis occurs as a spontaneous, abiotic exergonic reac- tion at hydrothermal vents. The overall similarity between that reaction and biological meth- anogenesis fits well with the concept of a methanogenic root for archaea and an autotrophic origin of microbial physiology. riting about early microbial evolution is a given that FeS clusters are basically minerals, Wdaunting task, so it was possibly unwise hence ancient, and that oxygen comes from cy- to agree to do it. At present, there is a lot going anobacteria, cyanobacteria in turn being too on—news to report and new things to think complex in physiology to be the most ancient about. Some of the current news has to do prokaryotes. In that view, life got off to an an- with phylogenetic trees. Trees tend to change aerobic start, with help from minerals, with ox- over time as new data and methods emerge. ygen being a biological invention that microbes Before there were trees (molecular phylogenies), gradually learned to live with. That is a reason- the study of microbial evolution was about put- able proposition. ting chemical processes in sequence. Eck and Before it was known that methanogens are Dayhoff (1966), for example, had iron–sulfur archaea, Decker et al. (1970) ordered the emer- (FeS) proteins like ferredoxin and strict anaer- gence of physiological phenotypes along a obes like clostridia early, a reasonable premise sequence from strict anaerobes via facultative Editor: Howard Ochman Additional Perspectives on Microbial Evolution available at www.cshperspectives.org Copyright # 2016 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; all rights reserved; doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018127 Cite this article as Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2016;8:a018127 1 Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on October 6, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press W.F. Martin and F.L. Sousa anaerobes to aerobes and from autotrophs and the early historyof life. That was the plan at least, fermenters to phototrophs and heterotrophs. and it would definitely work, as long as lateral Their scheme had clostridia and methanogens gene transfer (LGT), which genomes uncovered (having cobalamin) branching first, followed by as a powerful mechanism in prokaryote genome sulfate reducers (having heme), then by bacte- evolution (Ochman et al. 2000), had not scram- rial photosynthesizers (having chlorophylls) bled history too much (Dickerson 1980). The and diverse bacteria having respiratory chains, issue of how tree-like prokaryote evolution is including forms that use oxygen as a terminal or is not (because of LGT) is still simmering. acceptor. That is also a reasonable proposition. Some say that prokaryote evolution is tree-like (For illustration, we have based our scheme in (Ciccarelli et al. 2006; Boussau and Gouy 2012), Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 on data in Figure 11 in Decker some say that it is somewhat tree-like (Puigbo` et al. 1970.) et al. 2009), some say that “only 1%” is tree-like The rRNA revolution and the discovery of (Dagan and Martin 2006), some say that we can- archaea changed everything, of course (Woese not tell, so we should assume that it is tree-like and Fox, 1977; Woese 1987), and the evolution (Forterre 2015), while some say “can we just get of prokaryotes became something one could on with it” (Lawrence and Hendrickson 2003). investigate using trees. With ribosomal RNA se- Microbiologists always knew about LGT, quences, one could suddenly do trees, as accu- having even built a tolerance of up to 30% dif- rately as desired or as accurately as possible, sort ference in gene content between strains of the out the branches, plot characters across those same species into the species definition (Wayne branches—just like in vertebrate phylogeny— et al. 1987; Stackebrandt and Ebers 2006), there- and infer ancestral states so as to possibly read by fully anticipating the exciting findings from Anaerobes Aerobes Aerotolerant Obligate Facultative Obligate obligate Clostridia, Sulfate- Purple and green Lactobacilli and Enterobacteria, Pseudomonas, methane-forming reducing sulfur bacteria propionibacteria Athiorhodaceae Corynebacteria bacteria bacteria – Cytochrome oxidases + Oxygenases + Phorbin + Cytochrome oxidases + Porphin + Corrin Redrawn from Primordial anaerobes Decker et al. 1970 Figure 1. Biological steps in the evolution of microbial metabolism as posited 45 years ago. (Based on Figure 11 in Decker et al. 1970.) 2 Cite this article as Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2016;8:a018127 Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on October 6, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Early Microbial Evolution H2O H2O O2 Aerobic respiration Oxygenic Haloarchaea photosynthesis Anaerobic photosynthesis Other archaea Chlorophyll Cytochromes Anaerobic and respiration quinones Fermentations Fermentations Cytochromes and quinones Na+ Acetyl-CoA CH3-CoFeSP CH4 ADP + Pi CO ATP CoM-S-S-CoB Acetyl-P ADP ADP + Pi ATP HS-CoB 2 H2 + Pi CO2 CH3-THF CH -S-CoM 3 Fdox ATP NAD+ MtrA-H Acetate NADH 2– CH -H MPT Fd CH2-THF 3 4 NAD+ Na+ F Eha/ 420 Ehb H 2 H2 NADH 2 F420H2 H CH-THF CH -H MPT 2 2 4 2 Na+ Fdox F420 CH -CoFeSP Rnf H 3 2 F420H2 2– 2– + CO Fd Fd CHO-THF CH-H4MPT 2 Na+ ADP + Pi ATP CO NADH Formate CHO-MFR Acetyl-CoA 2 + 2 H Fdox Fd2– H2 CO2 CO2 Biosynthesis Bacteria Archaea (acetogens) (methanogens) Corrins LUCA (last universal common ancestor) Hydrothermal setting Figure 2. A possible sequence of events in early evolution starting from alkaline hydrothermal vents. (Legend continues on following page.) Cite this article as Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2016;8:a018127 3 Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on October 6, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press W.F. Martin and F.L. Sousa genomics that prokaryotes have pangenomes humans have no alternative but to report sub- (Lapierre and Gogarten 2009; Koonin 2010). jectively, based on their scientific background, With such a turbulent background for the study what they have learned and what they believe to of early evolution, hot debates were sure to fol- be true (what premises they embrace). That is low, most of which will never be resolved to particularly true for early evolution, because the everyone’s satisfaction, because there are so topic is so broad, and many of its central prob- many unknowns about early microbial evolu- lems underdetermined. Articles in Wikipedia tion, which makes it so interesting. are not signed by their authors, so we cannot Before going any further, a caveat is in order. see who wrote them; hence, we cannot begin The study of early evolution will always be a to wonder what schools and biases are behind controversial topic because it is so far removed the reporting. Scientific papers have author from today in time that we will never know names on them, making the nature of the (in- exactly (or perhaps even approximately) what nate) subjectivity more transparent. Truly ob- happened. But, scientists and the taxpayers jective reporting on early evolution is not pos- who fund science nonetheless generally want sible: the ideas are diverse, the literature is vast, to know something about early evolution and nobody knows all of it, and one cannot write have well-justified expectations that specialists about all of the ideas in one essay. The reader is (like us) should be able to report on the topic thus warned that we will be reporting from our in a readable form. It is perhaps unfortunate, particular viewpoint and that some microbiol- though, that many taxpayers and many scien- ogists generally agree with what we are saying tists will never turn to the scientific literature for here, while others do not, which is fine. information about early evolution, consulting For the purpose of this article, the term Wikipedia or some other web-based informa- “early microbial evolution” designates the phase tion storage and retrieval system instead. Why is of evolution from the emergence of life to the that unfortunate? Because Wikipedia, despite its divergence of the first microbial lineages. In the aura of objectivity, is written by humans and modern era (since we knew about archaea), Figure 2. (Continued) Simplified scheme of energy metabolism showing the similarities between acetate (left) and methane (right) formation from H2 and CO2 by acetogenic bacteriawithout cytochromes (the map shown is for Acetobacterium woodii, based on data in Schuchmann and Mu¨ller 2014) and hydrogenotrophic methano- genic archaea (from data in Buckel and Thauer 2013).
Recommended publications
  • 2003 Archaea: Ecology, Metabolism and Molecular Biology
    GORDON RESEARCH CONFERENCES frontiers of science P.O. Box 984, West Kingston, RI 02892-0984 Phone: 401 783-4011 Fax: 401 783-7644 E-Mail: [email protected] World Wide Web: http://www.grc.org founded in 1931 Nancy Ryan Gray, Ph.D. Director 2003 GORDON RESEARCH CONFERENCE on 2003 Archaea: Ecology, Metabolism and Molecular Biology FINAL PROGRESS REPORT DOE DE-FG02-03ER15432 The Gordon Research Conference (GRC) on 2003 Archaea: Ecology, Metabolism and Molecular Biology was held at Proctor Academy, Andover, NH from August 3-8, 2003. The Conference was well-attended with 150 participants (attendees list attached). The attendees represented the spectrum of endeavor in this field coming from academia, industry, and government laboratories, both U.S. and foreign scientists, senior researchers, young investigators, and students. In designing the formal speakers program, emphasis was placed on current unpublished research and discussion of the future target areas in this field. There was a conscious effort to stimulate lively discussion about the key issues in the field today. Time for formal presentations was limited in the interest of group discussions. In order that more scientists could communicate their most recent results, poster presentation time was scheduled. Attached is a copy of the formal schedule and speaker program and the poster program. In addition to these formal interactions, "free time" was scheduled to allow informal discussions. Such discussions are fostering new collaborations and joint efforts in the field. I want to personally thank you for your support of this Conference. As you know, in the interest of promoting the presentation of unpublished and frontier- breaking research, Gordon Research Conferences does not permit publication of meeting proceedings.
    [Show full text]
  • A Korarchaeal Genome Reveals Insights Into the Evolution of the Archaea
    A korarchaeal genome reveals insights into the evolution of the Archaea James G. Elkinsa,b, Mircea Podarc, David E. Grahamd, Kira S. Makarovae, Yuri Wolfe, Lennart Randauf, Brian P. Hedlundg, Ce´ line Brochier-Armaneth, Victor Kunini, Iain Andersoni, Alla Lapidusi, Eugene Goltsmani, Kerrie Barryi, Eugene V. Koonine, Phil Hugenholtzi, Nikos Kyrpidesi, Gerhard Wannerj, Paul Richardsoni, Martin Kellerc, and Karl O. Stettera,k,l aLehrstuhl fu¨r Mikrobiologie und Archaeenzentrum, Universita¨t Regensburg, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany; cBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; dDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712; eNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894; fDepartment of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520; gSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154; hLaboratoire de Chimie Bacte´rienne, Unite´ Propre de Recherche 9043, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Universite´de Provence Aix-Marseille I, 13331 Marseille Cedex 3, France; iU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598; jInstitute of Botany, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, D-80638 Munich, Germany; and kInstitute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095 Communicated by Carl R. Woese, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL, April 2, 2008 (received for review January 7, 2008) The candidate division Korarchaeota comprises a group of uncul- and sediment samples from Obsidian Pool as an inoculum. The tivated microorganisms that, by their small subunit rRNA phylog- cultivation system supported the stable growth of a mixed commu- eny, may have diverged early from the major archaeal phyla nity of hyperthermophilic bacteria and archaea including an or- Crenarchaeota and Euryarchaeota.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeal Concept and the World It Lives In: a Retrospective
    Carl R. Woese (center) with His Majesty Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden and Queen Silvia on the occassion of his receiving the 2003 Crafoord Prize, given by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. Photo credit: Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. Photosynthesis Research 80: 361–372, 2004. 363 © 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Personal perspective The archaeal concept and the world it lives in: a retrospective Carl R. Woese Department of Microbiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, B103 Chemical and Life Sciences Laboratory, 601 South Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL 61801-3709, USA (e-mail: [email protected]; fax: +1-217-244-6697) Received 9 July 2003; accepted in revised form 30 August 2003 Key words: archaea, evolution, genomics, molecular phylogeny, phylogenetic reconstruction, ribosomal RNA Abstract The present retrospective concerns the discovery and development of the archaea, the so-called ‘third form of life’ that no one anticipated and many did not, and still do not want. In its birth pangs, which the archaea had a plenty, the concept encountered biology unmasked; for it ran up against some of the key struts in the 20th century biological edifice. Consequently, the history of the development of the archaeal concept provides an excellent window on certain of the weaknesses in the 20th century biology paradigm, weaknesses that have now led that paradigm to a conceptual dead end. On the other hand, the archaeal concept has also provided us one of the pillars on which a new holistic paradigm for biology can be built. So, it would seem of value to retrace some of the twists and turns in the history of the development of the archaeal concept.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 of Discover the World of Microbes
    Some like it hot I.A.L. Diamond and Billy Wilder Chapter 6 Life in b oiling w ater The press most likely did not highlight the report of Thomas Brock (Bloomington, Indiana; later Madison, Wisconsin, USA) in 1969 on the isolation of a bacterium from a pond in Yellowstone National Park. This bacterium, Thermus aquaticus, grows at 70 ° C (nearly 160 ° F). Every molecular biologist or microbiologist is famil- iar with the enzyme Taq polymerase, which was isolated from T. aquaticus and has proved essential for the PCR technique used for analysis of trace amounts of DNA (see Chapter 25 ). Growth at 70 ° C s ounds p retty e xciting, b ut i t ’ s f ar from the 100 ° C (212 ° F ) at w hich w ater b oils! Just wait a few minutes. Brock then isolated an organism that grows at 80 ° C, Sul- folobus acidocaldarius . Among microbiologists, these reports aroused an interest in microorganisms growing at high temperatures, so sites in the immediate vicinity of volcanoes or geysers, where it spits and sputters, became the hunting grounds of microbiologists. Two German microbiologists from Munich, Wolfgang Zillig (1925 – 2005) and Karl Otto Stetter, were especially eager to isolate and characterize microorganisms growing in boiling water. First, they studied the sulfur - oxidizing Sulfolobus species from the Solfatara volcanic crater near Naples, Italy, then they concentrated on hot springs in Iceland. It is no easy task to take samples at such hostile sites and to then demonstrate in the samples the presence of living organ- isms that can be grown in cultures and are able to yield a suffi cient cell mass for detailed studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Genomic Characterization of Metabolic Pathways in Sulfolobus Solfataricus
    Post-Genomic Characterization of Metabolic Pathways in Sulfolobus solfataricus Jasper Walther Thesis committee Thesis supervisors Prof. dr. J. van der Oost Personal chair at the laboratory of Microbiology Wageningen University Prof. dr. W. M. de Vos Professor of Microbiology Wageningen University Other members Prof. dr. W.J.H. van Berkel Wageningen University Prof. dr. V.A.F. Martins dos Santos Wageningen University Dr. T.J.G. Ettema Uppsala University, Sweden Dr. S.V. Albers Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany This research was conducted under the auspices of the Graduate School VLAG Post-Genomic Characterization of Metabolic Pathways in Sulfolobus solfataricus Jasper Walther Thesis Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. dr. M.J. Kropff, in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Academic Board to be defended in public on Monday 23 January 2012 at 11 a.m. in the Aula. Jasper Walther Post-Genomic Characterization of Metabolic Pathways in Sulfolobus solfataricus, 164 pages. Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, NL (2012) With references, with summaries in Dutch and English ISBN 978-94-6173-203-3 Table of contents Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Hot Transcriptomics 17 Chapter 3 Reconstruction of central carbon metabolism in Sulfolobus solfataricus using a two-dimensional gel electrophoresis map, stable isotope labelling and DNA microarray analysis 45 Chapter 4 Identification of the Missing
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperthermophilic Microorganisms - Karl O
    EXTREMOPHILES - Vol. I - Hyperthermophilic Microorganisms - Karl O. Stetter HYPERTHERMOPHILIC MICROORGANISMS Karl O. Stetter Universität Regensburg, Lehrstuhl für Mikrobiologie, Universitätsstraße 31, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany Keywords: Thermophilic, hyperthermophile, extremophile, prokaryote, archaea, bacteria, primitive, phylogeny, physiology, autotrophic, heterotrophic, heat stability, protein, nucleic acid, biotechnology, biotope, volcanic, hydrothermal, geothermal, solfataric, abyssal, antarctic, extraterrestrial, Mars Contents 1. Introduction 2. Biotopes of hyperthermophiles 2.1. Terrestrial biotopes 2.2. Marine biotopes 3. Phylogeny of hyperthermophiles 4. Taxonomy of hyperthermophiles 5. Sampling and isolation of hyperthermophiles 6. Strategies of life and environmental adaptations of hyperthermophiles 6.1. General metabolic potentialities 6.2. Physiological properties of the different groups of hyperthermophiles 6.2.1. Terrestrial hyperthermophiles 6.2.2. Marine hyperthermophiles 7. Distribution of species and complexity in hyperthermophilic ecosystems 8. Basis of heat stability and the upper temperature limit for life 9. Conclusions: hyperthermophiles in the history of life Acknowledgments Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary Hyperthermophilic Archaea and Bacteria with optimal growth temperatures between 80 and 110° C have been isolated from geo- and hydrothermally heated terrestrial and submarineUNESCO environments. Small subunit – rR NAEOLSS sequence comparisons indicate great phylogenetic diversity among the 32genera
    [Show full text]
  • (1928-2012), Who Revol
    15/15/22 Liberal Arts and Sciences Microbiology Carl Woese Papers, 1911-2013 Biographical Note Carl Woese (1928-2012), who revolutionized the science of microbiology, has been called “the Darwin of the 20th century.” Darwin’s theory of evolution dealt with multicellular organisms; Woese brought the single-celled bacteria into the evolutionary fold. The Syracuse-born Woese began his early career as a newly minted Yale Ph.D. studying viruses but he soon joined in the global effort to crack the genetic code. His 1967 book The Genetic Code: The Molecular Basis for Genetic Expression became a standard in the field. Woese hoped to discover the evolutionary relationships of microorganisms, and he believed that an RNA molecule located within the ribosome–the cell’s protein factory–offered him a way to get at these connections. A few years after becoming a professor of microbiology at the University of Illinois in 1964, Woese launched an ambitious sequencing program that would ultimately catalog partial ribosomal RNA sequences of hundreds of microorganisms. Woese’s work showed that bacteria evolve, and his perfected RNA “fingerprinting” technique provided the first definitive means of classifying bacteria. In 1976, in the course of this painstaking cataloging effort, Woese came across a ribosomal RNA “fingerprint” from a strange methane-producing organism that did not look like the bacterial sequences he knew so well. As it turned out, Woese had discovered a third form of life–a form of life distinct from the bacteria and from the eukaryotes (organisms, like humans, whose cells have nuclei); he christened these creatures “the archaebacteria” only to later rename them “the archaea” to better differentiate them from the bacteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Extremophiles
    EXTREMOPHILES Concepts: environmental stresses and adaptation mechanisms, life in cold, dry, hot, acidic, basic, radioactive, sulfidic places, names for different extremophiles, animals in extreme environments Reading: Rothschild and Mancinelli, Nature, 409, p 1092, 2001 1 What you should know • Examples of ‘extreme’ environments • Some concepts of what is ‘extreme’ and why • A strategy for quantifying ‘habitability • Strategies that allow organisms to survive ‘extreme’ environments • Examples of pertinent research and its application to understanding limits of life in the solar system 2 Historical Perspective • Most early attention given to hydrothermal systems • 1881, first thermophile cultured • 1903, Setchell notices “algae” in Yellowstone hot spings • Very little attention given to “extreme” habitats prior to mid 20th C • 1977, deep-sea hydrothermal vents first discovered • 1977, the Archaea are “discovered” (Woese and Fox) • 1980-1990, the Archaea are slowly recognized as a legitimate group; the 3 domain system is proposed • 1985, PCR-based molecular methods first applied to hydrothermal systems • 1998-present, Astrobiology “boom”; search for Earth analog systems fuels rapid increase in studies of “extreme” environments 3 http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov 4 Curiosity at Gale Crater on Mars Image courtesy of NASA. 5 http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov 6 Defining Extremes 1 • Temp: -20 °C to 121 °C Arctic sea- ice / hydrothermal vents • pH: <1 to 13 acid mine drainage This image has been removed basaltic aquifers / groundwater due to copyright restrictions. • “Toxins”: Tutum Bay, PNG up to Junge et al., 2004 70,000ppm Arsenic in vent sediments This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions. This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Aplicação Para PCR Genomic Characteristics of Major DNA Polymerase Producing Microorganisms: PCR Application
    adolesCiência :: Revista Júnior de Investigação ARTIGOS Características genómicas dos principais microrganismos produtores de DNA polimerase: Aplicação para PCR Genomic characteristics of major DNA polymerase producing microorganisms: PCR application Darling de Andrade Lourenço Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Brasil [email protected] Altino Branco Choupina Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Portugal [email protected] Resumo O conjunto de enzimas denominadas DNA polimerases são responsáveis pela síntese e reparação de ácido desoxirribonucleico (DNA). Essa característica é muito útil para ensaios em biologia molecular nos quais há a necessidade de amplificar fragmentos de DNA, como na Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase (PCR). Na PCR, um fragmento de DNA delimitado por primers específicos é amplificado pela ação de DNA polimerase num processo com vários ciclos. Nos primeiros anos, a realização da técnica necessitava de grandes volumes dessa enzima, uma vez que a mesma não resistia as altas temperaturas. Após a descoberta das DNA polimerases em microrganismos termófilos e hipertermófilos, ou seja, resistentes à alta temperatura, a técnica de PCR foi refinada até chegar ao que é conhecido atualmente. Nesse sentido, o objetivo deste trabalho foi realizar pesquisas nas bases de dados de literatura científica PubMed e Science Direct e identificar os principais microrganismos produtores das DNA polimerases comercializadas atualmente. Foram escolhidos os seguintes microrganismos: Thermus aquaticus, Pyrococcus furiosus¸ Thermococcus litoralis e Thermotoga maritima. A partir da utilização do banco de dados de genoma do NCBI, as características de genómica estrutural e funcional de cada um são apresentadas, bem como a genómica comparativa entre os quatro microrganismos. As sequências de aminoácidos das DNA polimerases destes microrganismos foram alinhadas através da ferramenta ClustalW para caracterização filogenética.
    [Show full text]
  • Microorganisms in the Environment − Unique Adaptations, Basic Metabolism, and Evolution
    Microorganisms in the Environment − Unique Adaptations, Basic Metabolism, and Evolution Nova Acta Leopoldina NF 96, Nr. 356, 13–18 (2008) Hyperthermophiles – Life in a Hot and Inorganic Environment Karl O. STETTER ML (Regensburg) With 3 Figures Abstract Natural hot-water-containing environments harbor complex communities of hyperthermophilic archaea and bac- teria (optimal growth: 80 –106 °C), representing the upper temperature limit of life (maximal growth tempera- ture: 113 °C). Most hyperthermophiles are anaerobic chemolithoautotrophs, which obtain energy from inorganic redox reactions. In line with the scenario of a hot early Earth, hyperthermophiles cover the deepest and shortest branches within the phylogenetic tree of life. The earliest archaeal phylogenetic lineage is represented by mem- bers with extremely tiny cells belonging to the novel kingdom of Nanoarchaeota. Zusammenfassung Wasserhaltige heiße Gebiete beinhalten komplexe Gemeinschaften hyperthermophiler Archaeen und Bakterien (optimales Wachstum: 80 –106 °C), welche die oberste Temperaturgrenze von Leben repräsentieren (maximale Wachstumstemperatur: 113 °C). Die meisten Hyperthermophilen sind anaerobe Chemolithoautotrophe, die ihre Energie aus anaeroben Redoxreaktionen gewinnen. Alle kürzesten tiefsten Äste im phylogenetischen Baum sind von Hyperthermophilen besetzt, im Einklang mit dem Bild von einer heißen frühen Erde. Die früheste phyloge- netische Linie innerhalb der Archaeen wird von den extrem kleinen Mitgliedern des neuen Reiches der Nano- archaeota repräsentiert. On Earth, most known life forms are adapted to ambient temperatures within the range of 15– 45 °C. Among microorganisms, thermophiles growing optimally between 45 and 70 °C have been known for a long time. During the past decades, novel microbes exhibiting un- precedented optimal growth temperatures in excess of 80 °C have been cultivated.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Biologists
    Scientist Birth-Death Country Humayun Abdulali (1914–2001), Indian ornithologist Aziz Ab'Saber (1924–2012), Brazilian geographer, geologist and ecologist Erik Acharius (1757–1819), Swedish botanist Johann Friedrich Adam (18th century–1806), Russian botanist Arthur Adams (1820–1878), English physician and naturalist Henry Adams (1813–1877), English naturalist and conchologist William Adamson (1731–1793), Scottish botanist (abbr. in botany: Aiton) Michel Adanson (1727–1806), French naturalist (abbr. in botany: Adans.) Monique Adolphe ( born 1932), French cell biologist Edgar Douglas Adrian (1889–1977), British electrophysiologist, winner of the 1932 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his research on neurons Adam Afzelius (1750–1837), Swedish botanist Carl Adolph Agardh (1785–1859), Swedish botanist Jacob Georg Agardh (1813–1901), Swedish botanist Louis Agassiz (1807–1873), Swiss zoologist Alexander Agassiz (1835–1910), American zoologist, son of Louis Agassiz Nikolaus Ager (1568–1634), French botanist Pedro Alberch i Vié (1954–1998), Spanish naturalist Bruce Alberts ( born 1938), American biochemist, former President of the United States National Academy of Sciences Nora Lilian Alcock (1874–1972), British pioneer in plant pathology Boyd Alexander (1873–1910), English ornithologist Horace Alexander (1889–1989), English ornithologist Richard D. Alexander ( born 1930), American evolutionary biologist Wilfred Backhouse Alexander (1885–1965), English ornithologist Alfred William Alcock (1859–1933), British naturalist Salim Ali (1896–1987),
    [Show full text]
  • Genomic Insights Into the Unique Nanoarchaeum/Ignicoccus Association Patrick Forterre*†, Simonetta Gribaldo* and Céline Brochier-Armanet‡
    Minireview Happy together: genomic insights into the unique Nanoarchaeum/Ignicoccus association Patrick Forterre*†, Simonetta Gribaldo* and Céline Brochier-Armanet‡ Addresses: *Institut Pasteur, 25 rue du Docteur Roux, 75015 Paris, France. †Université Paris-Sud, Institut de Génétique et Microbiologie, CNRS UMR8621, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France. ‡Université de Provence, Aix-Marseille I, CNRS UPR9043, Laboratoire de Chimie Bactérienne, IFR88, 31 chemin Joseph Aiguier, 13402, Marseille, Cedex 20, France. Correspondence: Patrick Forterre. Email: [email protected] Published: 23 January 2009 Journal of Biology 2009, 8:7 (doi:10.1186/jbiol110) The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at http://jbiol.com/content/8/1/7 © 2009 BioMed Central Ltd Abstract The complete genome sequence of the crenarchaeon Ignicoccus hospitalis published recently in Genome Biology provides a great leap forward in the dissection of its unique association with another hyperthermophilic archaeon, Nanoarchaeum equitans. A unique association in the archaeal world membrane is separated from an outer membrane, which The discovery of Nanoarchaeum equitans in a hydrothermal has a distinct lipid composition and contains pores of vent off the coast of Iceland by the group of Karl Stetter in unique type, by a periplasmic space with a variable width of 2002 has been one of the most exciting findings of the past between 20 and 500 nm. The association between N. equitans decade in microbiology [1,2]. This tiny regular coccus and I. hospitalis is particularly interesting because it is the (400 nm = 1% of the volume of Escherichia coli) lives at the first (and so far the only) known example of a parasitic/ surface (equitans meaning ‘riding’) of its host, the crenarch- symbiotic partnership involving two archaea, and moreover aeon Ignicoccus hospitalis (hospitalis referring to the ability to two hyperthermophilic organisms [1].
    [Show full text]