Redalyc.A Scientic Approach to Life
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Año 20, Nº71 2 0
Dep. legal: ppi 201502ZU4650 Esta publicación científica en formato digital es continuidad de la revista impresa ISSN 1315-5216 Depósito legal pp 199602ZU720 Comité Científico Dep. legal: ppi 201502ZU4650 Directores Honorarios Nohan CHOMSKY Boaventura de SOUSA SANTOS (Portugal) Revista Internacional de Filosofía Iberoamericana Leonardo BOFF Franz HINKELAMMERT (Costa Rica) y Teoría Social Revista Internacional de Filosofía Iberoamericana Enrique DUSSEL Friz WALLNER (Austria) Universidad del Zulia, Maracaibo, Venezuela Gloria M. COMESAÑA-SANTALICES Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales y Teoría Social Raúl FORNET-BETANCOURT Constança MARCONDES CESAR (Brasil) Centro de Estudios Sociológicos y Antropológicos (CESA) Universidad del Zulia, Maracaibo, Venezuela Gino CAPOZZI Didier Le LEGALL (Francia) Año 20. Nº 71. Octubre-Diciembre, 2015 Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales Gianni VATTIMO Contenido Centro de Estudios Sociológicos y Antropológicos (CESA) Weinne KARLSSON (Suecia) Andrés ORTÍZ-OSÉS Año 20, N° 71 Portadilla Adela Cortina (España) Jens EVALD: Alf Ross – a life............................................................................................................................................................................... p. 7 Director-Editor Sara Beatriz Guardia (Perú). PRESENTACIÓN Alessandro Serpe................................................................................................................................................................................................. p. 13 Álvaro B. MÁRQUEZ-FERNÁNDEZ -
Alf Ross 1899–1979: a Biographical Sketch
MFK-Mendip Job ID: 9777BK--0033-5 3 - 661 Rev: 30-09-2003 PAGE: 1 TIME: 06:44 SIZE: 61,11 Area: JNLS OP: AB ᭧ EJIL 2003 ............................................................................................. Alf Ross 1899–1979: A Biographical Sketch Knud Waaben* Alf Ross was born on 10 June 1899 in Copenhagen, the son of a civil servant in a government department. He graduated from high school in 1917. His first choice was to study at the Technical University, but he left it after one term and turned to law. He finished his legal studies in the summer of 1922 with remarkable results, obtaining the rare distinction then called laudabilis et qvidem egregie. Following graduation, he took up employment in a barrister’s office, but the practical occupations of a trainee did not satisfy him and he preferred to devote his time to further studies in law. Ross was well deserving of the scholarship he received from the Law Faculty for studies abroad. These awards would normally enable a young lawyer to spend about two years in foreign universities, usually in Germany, France and England. In 1923, Ross set out on a study tour which lasted two and a half years. In this same year he married Else-Merete Helweg-Larsen, a student at the Faculty of Humanities, who later became a high school teacher. She was a member of Parliament in 1960–73, representing a small liberal party which held considerable influence over the formation of political majorities after general elections. Ross’ journey took him to France, England and Austria. He may have gone abroad, as many young people did, without a detailed plan of study, but rather with an open mind to learn all he could from foreign law, court visits and perhaps from discussions with professors. -
This Is the Author's Original Manuscript of an Article
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Helsingin yliopiston digitaalinen arkisto This is the author’s original manuscript of an article published in the Journal of Modern European History vol. 17, no. 4., 2019, pp. 500-518. https://doi.org/10.1177/1611894419880462 Author correspondence: Johan Strang, Associate Professor, University of Helsinki ([email protected]) Centre for Nordic Studies P.O.Box 59 00014 University of Helsinki Finland Title of article: The other European post-war democratic settlement? Scandinavian intellectuals contemplating the fragility of democracy in the wake of the Second World War Abstract: It is often argued that the Scandinavian post-war period was marked by a democratic optimism that contrasts with the deep concerns for the inherent dangers of popular sovereignty and the thorough moral reconsideration that took place on the European continent in the wake of the Second World War. This article seeks to balance this view by exploring what Scandinavian intellectuals believed had caused the collapse of democracy in Europe in the 1930s and what they saw as the main threats to democracy in the emerging post-war societies. Focusing on the fears of socialist planning, concerns about the position of individual rights and freedoms in modern societies, and the anxieties concerning the secular total state, the article suggests that the Scandinavian post-war democratic settlement was indeed built around a different set of ideas from those evident in many other places in Europe, but that it was no less informed by recent historical experiences, or concerns for the fragility of democracy. -
Bibliography
BIBLIOGRAPHY Aarnio, A. 1983. The Development of Legal Theory and Philosophy of Law in Finland. In A. Aarnio, Philosophical Perspectives in Jurisprudence. Acta Philosophica Fennica, 9–46. Helsinki: The Philosophical Society of Finland. Aarnio, A., R. Alexy, A. Peczenik, W. Rabinowicz, and J. Wolenski, eds. 1998. On the Coherence Theory of Law. Lund: Juristförlaget. Aarnio, A., and H. Tolonen. 1998. Oikeuden yleistieteet (Jurisprudence). In Oikeustiede Suomes- sa 1900–2000. Ed. U. Kangas, 171–84. Helsinki: Werner Söderström Lakitieto Oy. Abramovich, V., and C. Courtis. 2002. Los derechos sociales como derechos exigibles (Social rights as enforceable rights). Madrid: Trotta. Achterberg, N. 1984. Brücken zwischen Sein und Sollen: Autonome Determinante und modal in- differentes Substrat (Bridges between is and ought: Autonomous determinants and the mod- ally indifferent substrate). In Rechtssystem und gesellschaftliche Basis bei Hans Kelsen. Ed. W. Krawietz and H. Schelsky, 445–52. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Ackerman, B. A. 2009. My Debt to Mirjan Damaška. Yale Law Journal Pocket Part 118: 171–6. Adams, M. 2006. Recht en democratie ter discussie: Essays over democratische rechtsvorming (A discussion on law and democracy: Essays on a democratic making of law). Leuven: Universi- taire Pers Leuven. Adler, M. 1904. Kausalität und Teleologie im Streite um die Wissenschaft (Causality and teleology in the fight for science). Vienna: Wiener Volksbuchhandlung. ———. 1911. Mach und Marx: Ein Beitrag zur Kritik des modernen Positivismus (Mach and Marx: A contribution to the critique of modern positivism). Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 33: 348–400. ———. 1913. Marxistische Probleme (Marxist problems). Stuttgart: Fischer. ———. 1920. Der Sozialismus und die Intellektuellen (Socialism and the intellectuals). -
Strangfragileaom
This is the author’s original manuscript of an article published in the Journal of Modern European History vol. 17, no. 4., 2019, pp. 500-518. https://doi.org/10.1177/1611894419880462 Author correspondence: Johan Strang, Associate Professor, University of Helsinki ([email protected]) Centre for Nordic Studies P.O.Box 59 00014 University of Helsinki Finland Title of article: The other European post-war democratic settlement? Scandinavian intellectuals contemplating the fragility of democracy in the wake of the Second World War Abstract: It is often argued that the Scandinavian post-war period was marked by a democratic optimism that contrasts with the deep concerns for the inherent dangers of popular sovereignty and the thorough moral reconsideration that took place on the European continent in the wake of the Second World War. This article seeks to balance this view by exploring what Scandinavian intellectuals believed had caused the collapse of democracy in Europe in the 1930s and what they saw as the main threats to democracy in the emerging post-war societies. Focusing on the fears of socialist planning, concerns about the position of individual rights and freedoms in modern societies, and the anxieties concerning the secular total state, the article suggests that the Scandinavian post-war democratic settlement was indeed built around a different set of ideas from those evident in many other places in Europe, but that it was no less informed by recent historical experiences, or concerns for the fragility of democracy. Keywords: Scandinavia, democracy, post-war, militant democracy, legal realism, welfare state, social democracy, Christian Democracy Acknowledgements: The author wants to thank the other contributors to this special issue, and especially its editors Martin Conway and Johanna Rainio-Niemi, for valuable comments on draft versions of this article. -
Nordic Legal Mind 1 Nordic
Nordic Legal Mind Pia Letto-Vanamo and Ditlev Tamm Letto-Vanamo, University of Helsinki, Faculty of Law, Helsinki, Finland Tamm, University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Law, Denmark, Copenhagen Abstract 1 Nordic Law There is no such thing as Nordic law, but you may talk of a Nordic legal mind. The Nordic countries, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden (including the autonomous regions of Greenland, and the Faroe and Åland islands) all have their own law and their own legal institutions. However, to speak of Nordic law may be useful as we need a concept that covers those peculiarities and similarities which, with certain reservations, can be considered as such characteristic and common features in dealing with the legal systems of these countries, which constitute the Nordic legal mind. Comparative lawyers trying to grasp European legal systems have traditionally put the Nordic countries together as one legal “family” or group, or at least as a subfamily of the continental European so-called “civil law family”.1 This classification can at least partly be explained by reference to history. Still, the idea of “Nordic-ness” is more recent. In a comparative analysis, the peculiarities of development seen in the Nordic legal system(s) are often explained by reference to a certain historical delay in accepting such ideas and institutions which are considered as belonging to the “European mainstream”. We may also speak of the centre and the periphery, to which the Nordic countries belong due to their geographical position. However, only in the 19th century did the idea of a specific “Nordic law” become a current notion to substitute the old division between Danish- Norwegian law on the one hand and Swedish law (including Finland) on the other, and then especially as a tool to promote cooperation in the field of law. -
Esta Edición Fue Compartida Por Zulay Díaz, Directora De Utopía Y Praxis
A scientific approach to life On 14th July 1923 Alf Ross wrote a letter to his future wife, Else-Merete Helweg-Larsen, who was studying in Germany. The letter contained deliberations about the journey that he was about to undertake as part of his studies. His problem was his doctoral thesis. Alf Ross burned to study philosophy and philosophy of law, but found it difficult to get a handle on the subject. ‘In a way I am tempted by a subject in the philosophy of law because it is there that great thoughts, a philosophy of life, can be found and one does not just suffocate in details. But such a study has never been written in Denmark. It would, literally speaking, be a new passion here. Will anybody read it? It does not “lead” to anything either. Do I dare? Can I? Am I strong enough?’ wrote Alf Ross. Else-Merete helped to focus Alf Ross’ mind by assuring him that the philosophy of law was where he would best formulate a scientific philosophy of life. On 22nd July 1923 she wrote: ‘Isn’t a subject in the philosophy of law the best way for you to clarify your philosophy of life? So work for the idea and don’t work because you want a result in the shape of a job at the university. Maybe you are better equipped for a detailed doctoral thesis, but if you really have some new, big, bold thoughts then you must also dare to present them. Strong enough Alf? Of course you are strong enough!’ she wrote.