"Super Derecho"
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
3B.2. Environment and early evolution of the 8 May 2009 “Super Derecho” Stephen F. Corfidi*1, Michael C. Coniglio 2, and John S. Kain 2 1 NOAA/NWS/NCEP Storm Prediction Center, Norman, Oklahoma 2 NOAA/OAR National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma 1. INTRODUCTION environment over the central plains on 8 May 2009. In particular, analyses from this event are compared This study documents the complex to those from other MCSs that have occurred over environment and early evolution of the remarkable much the same region and time of year. Although the derecho-producing convective system that crossed genesis and evolution of the MCV was a significant part of the central United States on 8 May 2009 (Fig. part of this event, the focus here is on the 1a). The derecho (Johns and Hirt 1987) severely environment and early evolution of the convective damaged buildings, utility lines, and trees over a system prior to the development of the MCV. We widespread area from western Kansas to eastern emphasize the system’s early evolution since it is Kentucky as a result of multiple wind gusts > 35 m s-1 likely that the ability to accurately predict convective and isolated gusts > 45 m s-1 (Fig. 1b). The systems of this type is strongly related to a detailed associated mesoscale convective system (MCS; understanding of the processes and environmental Zipser 1982) contained bow echoes (Fujita 1978) ingredients that can create such a system. during part of its lifetime, and an intense, long-lived mesoscale convective vortex (MCV; Davis and Trier 2007) developed during the latter stage of the MCS 2. DATA AND METHODOLOGY that was associated with very severe surface winds and tornadoes (Fig. 1). In addition, multiple Our analysis of the 8 May 2009 convective tornadoes and localized swaths of intense wind system makes use of radar data from the National damage occurred in association with strong meso-g Weather Service Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 scale (Orlanski 1975) vortices (Atkins and St. Laurent Doppler (WSR-88D) network. This analysis includes 2009) along the convective line, as found for other level II data from individual WSR-88D sites obtained extreme damaging-wind MCSs (Miller and Johns from the National Climatic Data Center, base 2000; Wheatley et al. 2006). reflectivity composites generated by Unisys, and composite (column-maximum) reflectivity derived from The 8 May 2009 MCS developed in a way the National Mosaic and Multi-sensor Quantitative that is common to similar systems that affect the precipitation estimation (NMQ) project (Vasiloff et al. central United States during spring. Convective 2007). In addition, this study uses surface and upper- initiation occurred along the eastern slopes of the air observations from a variety of platforms that were Rocky Mountains, and storms subsequently moved quality controlled by the NOAA Meteorological east to consolidate in a region of lower-tropospheric Assimilation Data Ingest System (MADIS) (see Fig. 2 warm advection, convergence, and conditional for site locations of the radiosonde, wind profiler, and instability in the exit region of a nocturnal low-level jet WSR-88D data used in this study). These data are (LLJ) (Blackadar 1957; Bonner 1968; McNider and used to document the complex development and Pielke 1981; Cotton et al. 1989; Laing and Fritsch early evolution of the convective event. 2000; Tuttle and Davis 2006). The development of a large, intense MCS resulted from a complex series of The MCS environment is further examined processes and mergers of several convective lines using the hourly RUC-model analyses provided on a and clusters over a relatively short time period, which 20-km grid and on constant pressure surfaces spaced is common for warm season MCSs (McAnelly et al. 25 hPa apart. To address the question of what was 1997; Jirak and Cotton 2003). unusual about the environment, the RUC analysis of the 8 May 2009 event is compared to those from 28 Routine surface and upper air observations MCSs obtained from the dataset described in Coniglio and analyses from the Rapid Update Cycle (RUC; et al. (2010) [referred to as C2010 hereafter]. This Benjamin et al. 2004) are used in this study to comparison dataset includes MCSs that occurred determine what, if anything, was unusual about the from early May to early June in the central U.S. and __________________________________________ that had a nearly contiguous reflectivity region ≥ 35 dBZ at least 100 km in length and embedded echoes * Corresponding author address: Stephen F. Corfidi, ≥ 50 dBZ for at least five continuous hours. Although NOAA/NWS/NCEP/Storm Prediction Center, 120 D. not all of the comparison MCSs produced derechos or L. Boren Blvd., Norman, OK 73072; email: [email protected] Fig. 2. Locations and names of the 915 MHz wind profiler sites (★ ),WSR-88D sites (▲), and radiosonde sites (●) used in this study. Figure 1. (a) Hourly composite reflectivity images from the NMQ project plotted at 1-hr intervals (UTC) and (b) severe weather reports associated with the derecho-producing MCS (hail ≥ 0.75 inches in open 3. ANALYSIS green circles, hail ≥ 2.0 inches in filled green circles, wind damage or wind gusts ≥ 26 m s-1, or 50 kt, in a. Environmental conditions preceding open blue circles, wind gusts measured or estimated development of deep convection ≥ 33.5 m s-1, or 65 kt, in filled blue circles, and tornado reports in red), from 0300 UTC to 2300 UTC 8 May Relatively dry conditions and few clouds 2009. covered much of the central High Plains in the early afternoon of 7 May (Fig. 3a) beneath moderately strong westerly mid to upper level flow (Figs. 4 and 5). A band of cumuliform clouds developed over far severe weather, all of them eventually transitioned northeast Colorado (Fig. 3a) near the western end of into a leading line/trailing stratiform structure (Houze a surface trough that extended from a weak low over et al. 1989; Parker and Johnson 2000) that resembled far eastern Nebraska. Cloud bases were relatively the mature structure of the 8 May 2009 MCS. high, atop a well-mixed, relatively dry boundary layer (Fig. 4). Nearby WSR-88D radars detected light In the C2010 study, changes in the precipitation (mostly < 35 dBZ) with this initial environment relative to the location and movement of cloudiness, much of which did not appear to reach the the MCSs are examined by producing composite ground. The low CAPE likely limited the strength of RUC analyses at several stages in the MCS lifecycle, the convection initially. including the pre-deep-convection environment (termed the “first storms” stage in C2010) and the Vertical motion and potential temperature environment ahead of newly developed MCSs fields in vertical cross sections (not shown) suggest (termed the “genesis” stage in C2010). The that mountain waves partially were responsible for the environments at the time of the first storms' and initial clouds and precipitation. Upstream conditions genesis stages of the 8 May 2009 MCS are compared in which strong mountain waves are likely to develop to the composite environments of the first storms’ and are evident in the observed soundings at Grand genesis stages for the 28 other MCSs in the C2010 Junction and Denver, Colorado (not shown), and in data set using standardized anomalies (as), where as the nearby RUC sounding (Fig. 4). These conditions = (xa - x)σs is calculated at each grid point, xa is a consist of (i) strong wind at mountain top level, grid point value of a variable x in the RUC analysis for increasing with height and oriented perpendicular to the 8 May 2009 event, x is the mean of x from the the mountain range throughout a deep layer, and (ii) a C2010 MCS data set, and σs is the sample standard relatively stable layer near mountain top height with deviation of x from the C2010 MCS data set. The first weaker stability at higher levels (Durran 1986). storms’ and genesis stages of the 8 May 2009 MCS Furthermore, a local maximum in low-level westerly are defined to be at 0300 UTC and 0700 UTC, flow over the terrain in far southern Wyoming appears respectively. Examination of the anomalies in this to enhance the convergence and upward motion manner allows an investigation of what was unusual locally over far southeastern Wyoming (not shown), about the environment of the 8 May 2009 derecho where the shallow convection first appears. compared to other MCS environments that occurred in a similar place and time of year. The northeastern Colorado/southeastern Wyoming/Nebraska border region also was under the right entrance region of a mid-level jet streak (Fig. 5), (a) 2215 UTC 7 May (d) 50° F 60° F 70° F (b) (e) H (c) H (f) Figure 3. Manual surface analyses, valid at the indicated times (UTC), for 7 - 8 May 2009. Synoptic scale fronts in solid blue/red; troughs and axes of low level warm advection dashed black and red, respectively; outflow boundaries dotted blue. Contours of the 50, 60, and 70°F isodrosotherms included in (a); contours of sea-level pressure (grey solid lines; every 2 hPa) in (b)-(f). Surface data plots conventional, with full wind barb = 5 m s-1 in (b) - (f). NMQ composite reflectivity mosaics are included in (b) - (f), and the 2215 UTC visible data satellite image in (a). which often is collocated with MCS development (Maddox 1983; Johns 1993; Coniglio et al. 2004). The flow is significantly ageostrophic in this region (Fig. 5), which may be the result of jet-streak dynamics (Uccellini and Johnson 1979) and lee-side flow deceleration associated with terrain-induced waves (Durran 1986). Furthermore, upslope flow and an associated “Denver cyclone” (Szoke et al.