Marquette Sports Law Review Volume 17 Article 4 Issue 1 Fall Did Major League Baseball Balk? Why Didn't MLB Bargain to Impasse and Impose Stricter Testing for Performance Enhancing Substances? Michael J. Cramer James W. Swiatko Jr. Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/sportslaw Part of the Entertainment and Sports Law Commons Repository Citation Michael J. Cramer and James W. Swiatko Jr., Did Major League Baseball Balk? Why Didn't MLB Bargain to Impasse and Impose Stricter Testing for Performance Enhancing Substances? , 17 Marq. Sports L. Rev. 29 (2006) Available at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/sportslaw/vol17/iss1/4 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. ARTICLES DID MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL BALK? WHY DIDN'T MLB BARGAIN TO IMPASSE AND IMPOSE STRICTER TESTING FOR PERFORMANCE ENHANCING SUBSTANCES? MICHAEL J. CRAMER * & JAMES M. SWIATKO, JR.** I. INTRODUCTION The period of 1994 through 2002 has been called a myriad of things by commentators, fans, baseball personnel and players when referring to this time period in baseball history. Unfortunately, not many of the names used or applied are complimentary, at least by those who are not part of the Major League Baseball (MLB) hierarchy. Names such as "Baseball's Watergate" or "Selig's Watergate,"' the "Tainted Era,"2 the "Non-Drug Testing Era," the "*ERA" or simply the "Steroids Era"3 have been suggested. Conversely, MLB commissioner Bud Selig has called this period a "renaissance" for baseball and "baseball's Golden Age." 4 As can be seen by these few examples of opinions about the subject time period, a wide gap exists in the perceptions of those who have expressed opinions on the subject.