The Long and Short of It : from Aphorism to Novel / Gary Saul Morson

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Long and Short of It : from Aphorism to Novel / Gary Saul Morson THE LONG AND SHORT O F I T THE L O N G A N D SHORT OF I T FROM APHORISM TO NOVEL GARY SA U L MO R S O N STA NFO R D UNI VERSITY P RESS STA NFO R D , CAL I F O R N I A Stanford University Press Stanford, California © by the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system without the prior written permission of Stanford University Press. Printed in the United States of America on acid-free, archival-quality paper Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Morson, Gary Saul, – author. The long and short of it : from aphorism to novel / Gary Saul Morson. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ---- (cloth : alk. paper) — ---- (pbk. : alk. paper) . Aphorisms and apothegms—History and criticism. Wit and humor—History and criticism. Epigram. Literary form. I. Title. . '.—dc Typeset by Bruce Lundquist in / Minion FOR KATIE They were arguing about something complex and important, and neither one of them could convince the other. They did not agree about anything, and that made their dispute all the more engaging and endless. —Mikhail Bulgakov, The Master and Margarita ACK NOWL E DGM E N T S Some thirty years ago, my former teacher, the late Martin Price, commenting on my first book, remarked that my style tended to the aphoristic and sug- gested that I might someday examine the form systematically. Around that time, I attended classes and lectures given by the University of Pennsylva- nia’s Department of Folklore and Folklife and learned a great deal from Dan Ben-Amos, Barbara Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, and the late Dell Hymes. Along with two other scholars associated with that department, Phyllis Gorfain and Joanne Mulcahy, they taught me to appreciate proverbs, jokes, and folktales as much more interesting and complex than we usually suppose. The work of the late Thomas M. Greene helped me to understand the complexities of quo- tations, aphorisms, and their place in Renaissance literature. Caryl Emerson convinced me, but not well enough, that, as aphorisms must not be too long, so they must not be too plentiful. When I finally began writing this book in the mid-s, I discussed its key ideas with Robert Alter, Jonathan Brent, and Joseph Epstein. They remain the implicit addressees of many passages below. In my understanding of the great aphoristic philosophers, I benefited greatly from discussions and cor- respondence with Bracht Branham, Walter Jost, Kenneth Seeskin, Meredith Williams, and Michael Williams. Three times I co-taught a course with the late Stephen Toulmin, and my understanding of Wittgenstein developed under his guidance. Stephen’s influence on my thinking will be apparent to anyone who knows our work. I changed no less, but in different ways, from the profound and unique conversation of the late Aron Katsenelinboigen and from the wise and warm words of Kenneth Mischel. More recently, I had the pleasure of co-teaching a course using some ideas from this book with Morton Schapiro, who, in his role as president of North- western University, has fostered the spirit and atmosphere in which great re- xii A C KNO W L E D G M E N T S search and teaching thrive. His responses to my ideas inspired some changes of which he is still unaware. Perhaps Bud Bynack, Michael Denner, Dilip Gaonkar, Robert Hariman, Robert Louis Jackson, Richard Kieckhefer, Lawrence Lipking, Daniel Lowenstein, Kathe Marshall, Susan McReynolds-Oddo, Barbara Newman, Clara Claiborne Park, Janice Pavel, Helen Tartar, and Herbert Tucker are also not fully aware of all they contributed. Even more than my colleagues, my students revive, at painful moments of doubt, my sense of dedication and purpose. I know I will regret omitting some names which will come to mind only after this book has gone to press, but, notwithstanding that risk, let me record my gratitude to Lindsay Sargent Berg, Wendy Cheng, Nava Cohen, Andrew Gruen, Robert Gurley, Omar Hassan, John Mafi, Lori Singer Meyer, Matthew Morrison, Karthik Sivashanker, Trish Suchy, Andrew Thompson, Ryan Vogt, Christina Walker, Cindy Wang, and Annabel We. Robert Belknap and the late Wayne Booth not only taught me a good deal about aphorisms but also, and much more important, offered unselfish help and served as scholarly role models. When difficulties with this manuscript drove me to near despair, I knew I could count on Elizabeth Cheresh Allen, Henry Carrigan, Thomas Marullo, Robin Feuer Miller, William Mills Todd, and Andrew Wachtel. I cannot express enough gratitude for all they did and wanted to do. Northwestern University offered a congenial environment in which to think and work. As I wrote this book, I was always mindful of the support of Dan Linzer, the late Lawrence Dumas, and Marilyn McCoy. Nava Cohen, Catherine Grimstead, and Mark Ratner helped in ways that mattered more than they know. In his reading for Stanford University Press, and in subsequent correspon- dence, Frederick Crews showed me places where changes were needed. Thomas Pavel, in his reading and subsequent comments, suggested especially insight- ful ways to make those changes. The result, at least to my mind, is a better book. Emily-Jane Cohen’s confidence in this project ensured its completion and appearance. Steven Blumenkranz’s commentaries and advice have been a guide for some six decades. No matter how often I try, I am always at a loss to express all I owe, in so many ways, to Frances Padorr Brent and Jonathan Brent. Not a day goes by when I do not think of some conversation with Michael André Bernstein, who died while this book was in press. When I would forget important things about myself, he would remember. I know no one wiser. And I A C KNO W L E D G M E N T S xiii am always guided by his refrain that what really matters is “to keep the conversa- tion going.” As I worked on this manuscript over the past few years, I also learned to admire, and admire still more, all that Dalya Sachs-Bernstein does every day. It is hard to imagine saying what I have learned from Shirley Morson. Even ninety-three million years would be insufficient to express my care for Alexander Morson and Emily Morson. Could either brevity or length suffice to express what I owe to my wife, Katie Porter? A B BREVI A T I O N S D The Dumbest Things Ever Said, ed. Steven D. Price (Guilford, CT: Lyons Press, ). S Ross and Kathryn Petras, The Stupidest Things Ever Said (New York: Broadway, ). ABPE The Anchor Bible: Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, ed. and trans. R. B. Y. Scott (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, ). AE The Adages of Erasmus, ed. William Barker (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, ). The volume contains one introduction by the editor (ix–xlvii) and one by Erasmus (–), which first appeared in the edition. AIW Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland: Authoritative Texts of “Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland,” “Through the Looking Glass,” and “The Hunting of the Snark,” ed. Donald J. Gray (New York: Norton, ). AK Leo Tolstoy, Anna Karenina, the Garnett translation revised by Leonard J. Kent and Nina Berberova (New York: Modern Library, ). AWD/AWD Fyodor Dostoevsky, A Writer’s Diary, trans. Kenneth Lantz, vol. (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, ); vol. (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, ). BBA Bartlett’s Book of Anecdotes, ed. Clifton Fadiman and André Bernard (Boston: Little, Brown, ). BFQ John Bartlett, Familiar Quotations: A Collection of Passages, Phrases, and Proverbs Traced to Their Sources in Ancient and Modern Literature, th ed., ed. Emily Morison Beck (Boston: Little, Brown, ). xvi A B B R EVIA T ION S BK Fyodor Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov, trans. Constance Garnett (New York: Modern Library, ). BOG Gary Saul Morson, The Boundaries of Genre: Dostoevsky’s “Diary of a Writer” and the Traditions of Literary Utiopia (Austin: University of Texas Press, ). BOP The Book of Psalms: A Translation with Commentary, ed. and trans. Robert Alter (New York: Norton, ). BWA The Basic Works of Aristotle, ed. Richard McKeon (New York: Random House, ). C&P Fyodor Dostoevsky, Crime and Punishment (New York: Modern Library, ). CCAS Chinese Civilization: A Sourcebook, nd ed., ed. Patricia Buckley Ebrey (New York: Free Press, ). CEM The Complete Essays of Montaigne, trans. Donald Frame (Stanford: Stanford University Press, ). CHQ Cassell’s Humourous Quotations, ed. Nigel Rees (London: Cassell, ). CWA The Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. , ed. Jonathan Barnes (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, ). DAF Edward Gibbon, The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, ed. J. B. Bury (New York: Heritage, ). DD Ambrose Bierce, The Devil’s Dictionary (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, n.d.). DI M. M. Bakhtin, The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. Michael Holquist, trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist (Austin: University of Texas Press, ). DL/DL Diogenes Laertius, Lives of Eminent Philosophers, trans. R. D. Hicks, vols. and (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, ). DPQ A Dictionary of Philosophical Quotations, ed. A. J. Ayer and Jane O’Grady (Oxford: Blackwell, ). DSQ A Dictionary of Scientific Quotations, ed. Alan L. Mackay (Bristol, UK: Institute of Physics Publishing, ). A B B R EVIAT ION S xvii EPP English Prose and Poetry, –: A Selection, ed. Frank Brady and Martin Price (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, ). F&S Ivan Turgenev, Fathers and Sons, ed. Ralph E. Matlaw (New York: Norton, ). GSW Leo Tolstoy, Great Short Works, trans. Louise and Aylmer Maude (New York: Harper and Row, ).
Recommended publications
  • E-Notes on the Master and Margarita
    The Master and Margarita Author unknown e-Notes on The Master and Margarita From the archive section of The Master and Margarita http://www.masterandmargarita.eu Webmaster Jan Vanhellemont Klein Begijnhof 6 B-3000 Leuven +3216583866 +32475260793 Table of Contents 1. Master and Margarita: Introduction 2. Mikhail Bulgakov Biography 3. One-Page Summary 4. Summary and Analysis 5. Quizzes 6. Themes 7. Style 8. Historical Context 9. Critical Overview 10. Character Analysis 11. Essays and Criticism 12. Suggested Essay Topics 13. Sample Essay Outlines 14. Compare and Contrast 15. Topics for Further Study 16. Media Adaptations 17. What Do I Read Next? 18. Bibliography and Further Reading 1. INTRODUCTION The Master and Margarita by Mikhail Bulgakov is considered one of the best and most highly regarded novels to come out of Russia during the Soviet era. The book weaves together satire and realism, art and religion, history and contemporary social values. It features three story lines. The main story, taking place in Russia of the 1930s, concerns a visit by the devil, referred to as Professor Woland, and four of his assistants during Holy Week; they use black magic to play tricks on those who cross their paths. Another story line features the Master, who has been languishing in an insane asylum, and his love, Margarita, who seeks Woland's help in being reunited with the Master. A third story, which is presented as a novel written by the Master, depicts the crucifixion of Yeshua Ha-Notsri, or Jesus Christ, by Pontius Pilate. Using the fantastic elements of the story, Bulgakov satirizes the greed and corruption of Stalin's Soviet Union, in which people's actions were controlled as well as their perceptions of reality.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Accounts 2004/2005
    THE BFI PRESENTSANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2004/2005 WWW.BFI.ORG.UK The bfi annual report 2004-2005 2 The British Film Institute at a glance 4 Director’s foreword 9 The bfi’s cultural commitment 13 Governors’ report 13 – 20 Reaching out (13) What you saw (13) Big screen, little screen (14) bfi online (14) Working with our partners (15) Where you saw it (16) Big, bigger, biggest (16) Accessibility (18) Festivals (19) Looking forward: Aims for 2005–2006 Reaching out 22 – 25 Looking after the past to enrich the future (24) Consciousness raising (25) Looking forward: Aims for 2005–2006 Film and TV heritage 26 – 27 Archive Spectacular The Mitchell & Kenyon Collection 28 – 31 Lifelong learning (30) Best practice (30) bfi National Library (30) Sight & Sound (31) bfi Publishing (31) Looking forward: Aims for 2005–2006 Lifelong learning 32 – 35 About the bfi (33) Summary of legal objectives (33) Partnerships and collaborations 36 – 42 How the bfi is governed (37) Governors (37/38) Methods of appointment (39) Organisational structure (40) Statement of Governors’ responsibilities (41) bfi Executive (42) Risk management statement 43 – 54 Financial review (44) Statement of financial activities (45) Consolidated and charity balance sheets (46) Consolidated cash flow statement (47) Reference details (52) Independent auditors’ report 55 – 74 Appendices The bfi annual report 2004-2005 The bfi annual report 2004-2005 The British Film Institute at a glance What we do How we did: The British Film .4 million Up 46% People saw a film distributed Visits to
    [Show full text]
  • Ull History Centre: Papers of Alan Plater
    Hull History Centre: Papers of Alan Plater U DPR Papers of Alan Plater 1936-2012 Accession number: 1999/16, 2004/23, 2013/07, 2013/08, 2015/13 Biographical Background: Alan Frederick Plater was born in Jarrow in April 1935, the son of Herbert and Isabella Plater. He grew up in the Hull area, and was educated at Pickering Road Junior School and Kingston High School, Hull. He then studied architecture at King's College, Newcastle upon Tyne, becoming an Associate of the Royal Institute of British Architects in 1959 (since lapsed). He worked for a short time in the profession, before becoming a full-time writer in 1960. His subsequent career has been extremely wide-ranging and remarkably successful, both in terms of his own original work, and his adaptations of literary works. He has written extensively for radio, television, films and the theatre, and for the daily and weekly press, including The Guardian, Punch, Listener, and New Statesman. His writing credits exceed 250 in number, and include: - Theatre: 'A Smashing Day'; 'Close the Coalhouse Door'; 'Trinity Tales'; 'The Fosdyke Saga' - Film: 'The Virgin and the Gypsy'; 'It Shouldn't Happen to a Vet'; 'Priest of Love' - Television: 'Z Cars'; 'The Beiderbecke Affair'; 'Barchester Chronicles'; 'The Fortunes of War'; 'A Very British Coup'; and, 'Campion' - Radio: 'Ted's Cathedral'; 'Tolpuddle'; 'The Journal of Vasilije Bogdanovic' - Books: 'The Beiderbecke Trilogy'; 'Misterioso'; 'Doggin' Around' He received numerous awards, most notably the BAFTA Writer's Award in 1988. He was made an Honorary D.Litt. of the University of Hull in 1985, and was made a Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature in 1985.
    [Show full text]
  • "WHAT IS a SECT?" in EAST WEST Perspectivel Edward G
    THE SECTARIAN IN US. QUESTIONS ON THE QUESTION "WHAT IS A SECT?" IN EAST WEST PERSPECTIVEl Edward G. Farrugia, SJ Until before Vatican II the answer to the question what a sect is seemed to present, for many in the Catholic Church, no special difficulties. Whoever cut himself or herself off from the one true Church belonged, in ascending order of distance from the one true Church, to one of three categories: a) schismatics, b) heretics or c) sects. Schismatics had basically rescinded only communion while practically retaining the whole truth; heretics, while giving up some basic truths, had kept many others; and sects ];lad disfigured the truth to such an extent that they could hardly claim to be Christians any longer, in spite of some Christian elements in their new beliefs and could be described as a Christian sect primarily in view of the Christian Church from which they broke off. o. Formulating the problem Our concern here is to formulate a problem in view of a dogmatic aspect which has been insufficiently discussed - sects considered not in thems<:?lves, but insofar as they provide elements for a differentiation between East and West. Given such a methodological self-restriction, it cannot be the purpose of this brief contribution to discuss so many studies on the theme, much less so regarding the question of the definition of sect. The study of L. Greenslade, Schism in the Early Church: What light can the past throw? (London 1984) could here be mentioned, as representative. I. Abbreviations: ALGERMISSEN =K. Algermissen, Konfessionskunde, (Revised by H.
    [Show full text]
  • Quercus ×Coutinhoi Samp. Discovered in Australia Charlie Buttigieg
    XXX International Oaks The Journal of the International Oak Society …the hybrid oak that time forgot, oak-rod baskets, pros and cons of grafting… Issue No. 25/ 2014 / ISSN 1941-2061 1 International Oaks The Journal of the International Oak Society … the hybrid oak that time forgot, oak-rod baskets, pros and cons of grafting… Issue No. 25/ 2014 / ISSN 1941-2061 International Oak Society Officers and Board of Directors 2012-2015 Officers President Béatrice Chassé (France) Vice-President Charles Snyers d’Attenhoven (Belgium) Secretary Gert Fortgens (The Netherlands) Treasurer James E. Hitz (USA) Board of Directors Editorial Committee Membership Director Chairman Emily Griswold (USA) Béatrice Chassé Tour Director Members Shaun Haddock (France) Roderick Cameron International Oaks Allen Coombes Editor Béatrice Chassé Shaun Haddock Co-Editor Allen Coombes (Mexico) Eike Jablonski (Luxemburg) Oak News & Notes Ryan Russell Editor Ryan Russell (USA) Charles Snyers d’Attenhoven International Editor Roderick Cameron (Uruguay) Website Administrator Charles Snyers d’Attenhoven For contributions to International Oaks contact Béatrice Chassé [email protected] or [email protected] 0033553621353 Les Pouyouleix 24800 St.-Jory-de-Chalais France Author’s guidelines for submissions can be found at http://www.internationaloaksociety.org/content/author-guidelines-journal-ios © 2014 International Oak Society Text, figures, and photographs © of individual authors and photographers. Graphic design: Marie-Paule Thuaud / www.lecentrecreatifducoin.com Photos. Cover: Charles Snyers d’Attenhoven (Quercus macrocalyx Hickel & A. Camus); p. 6: Charles Snyers d’Attenhoven (Q. oxyodon Miq.); p. 7: Béatrice Chassé (Q. acerifolia (E.J. Palmer) Stoynoff & W. J. Hess); p. 9: Eike Jablonski (Q. ithaburensis subsp.
    [Show full text]
  • A Leibnizian Approach to Mathematical Relationships: a New Look at Synthetic Judgments in Mathematics
    A Thesis entitled A Leibnizian Approach to Mathematical Relationships: A New Look at Synthetic Judgments in Mathematics by David T. Purser Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts Degree in Philosophy ____________________________________ Dr. Madeline M. Muntersbjorn, Committee Chair ____________________________________ Dr. John Sarnecki, Committee Member ____________________________________ Dr. Benjamin S. Pryor, Committee Member ____________________________________ Dr. Patricia Komuniecki, Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo December 2009 An Abstract of A Leibnizian Approach to Mathematical Relationships: A New Look at Synthetic Judgments in Mathematics by David T. Purser Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts Degree in Philosophy The University of Toledo May 2010 I examine the methods of Georg Cantor and Kurt Gödel in order to understand how new symbolic innovations aided in mathematical discoveries during the early 20th Century by looking at the distinction between the lingua characterstica and the calculus ratiocinator in the work of Leibniz. I explore the dynamics of innovative symbolic systems and how arbitrary systems of signification reveal real relationships in possible worlds. Examining the historical articulation of the analytic/synthetic distinction, I argue that mathematics is synthetic in nature. I formulate a moderate version of mathematical realism called modal relationalism. iii Contents Abstract iii Contents iv Preface vi 1 Leibniz and Symbolic Language 1 1.1 Introduction……………………………………………………. 1 1.2 Universal Characteristic……………………………………….. 4 1.2.1 Simple Concepts……………………………………….. 5 1.2.2 Arbitrary Signs………………………………………… 8 1.3 Logical Calculus………………………………………………. 11 1.4 Leibniz’s Legacy……………………………………………… 16 1.5 Leibniz’s Continued Relevance……………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • University of Pittsburgh Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures
    University of Pittsburgh Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures Russian 0590: Formative Masterpieces of 19th Century Russian Literature Vladimir Padunov Fall Semester 2010 427 CL Tuesdays and Thursdays 2:30—3:45 624-5713 CL 139 e-mail: [email protected] Office Hours: Mondays and Wednesdays 10:00—11:00; Tuesdays and Thursdays 11:00—12:00; and by appointment I. REQUIRED TEXTS: Chekhov, Anton. Anton Chekhov’s Short Stories. Ed. Ralph E. Matlaw. NY: Norton, 1979. Dostoevsky, Fyodor. Crime and Punishment. Ed. George Gibian. Tr. Jessie Coulson. 3rd ed. NY: Norton, 1989. Gogol, Nikolai. The Overcoat and Other Tales of Good and Evil. Tr. David Magarshack. NY: Norton, 1965. Lermontov, Mikhail. A Hero of Our Time. Tr. Vladimir Nabokov. Woodstock, NY: Ardis, 1986. Proffer, Carl, ed. From Karamzin to Bunin: An Anthology of Russian Short Stories. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1969. Pushkin, Alexandr. The Complete Prose Tales of Alexandr Sergeyevitch Pushkin. Tr. Gillon R. Aitken. NY: Norton, 1996. Turgenev, Ivan. Fathers and Children. Tr. and ed. Michael Katz. 2nd ed. NY: Norton, 2008. II. RECOMMENDED SECONDARY SOURCES: Andrew, Joe. Writers and Society during the Rise of Russian Realism. Atlantic Heights, NJ: Humanities P, 1980. —. Russian Writers and Society in the Second Half of the Nineteenth Century. Atlantic Heights, NJ: Humanities P, 1982. Bloom, Harold, ed. Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment. NY: Chelsea House, 1988. Fanger, Donald. Dostoevsky and Romantic Realism: A Study of Dostoevsky in Relation to Balzac, Dickens, and Gogol. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1965. Frank, Joseph. Dostoevsky: The Miraculous Years, 1865-1871. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Science and Criticism in Coleridge and Peirce
    ABDUCTING THE IMAGINATION: THE METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATION OF SCIENCE AND CRITICISM IN COLERIDGE AND PEIRCE by Thomas Dechand A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland October, 2014 © 2014 Thomas Dechand All Rights Reserved Abstract The core the dissertation examines S. T. Coleridge’s writings on method and imagination from the 1815 composition of Biographia Literaria through the publication of the “Essays on the Principles of Method” in the 1818 Friend. I demonstrate how these writings clarify, develop, and indeed repair Coleridge’s earlier theory of imagination by articulating its role within a general theory of inquiry meant to comprehend the works of science and literature as methodical investigations. Whereas the Biographia fails in its attempt to ground the imagination within a conception of the self as intellectually intuited in a manner conceived by German Idealists such as Schelling, Coleridge’s “Essays on Method” explore the imagination through a theory of inquiry predicated on the discovery, analysis, and contemplation of relations. I argue that Coleridge aligns the operation of the secondary imagination to a logical function: the eduction of an “idea,” according to Coleridge’s precise sense of that term as a necessarily tautegorical relation – one that expresses the same subject, but with a difference. It is ideas, so conceived, that serve to guide inquiry. Coleridge’s refinement of the theory of imagination is done in serve of his argument that ideas are “constitutive” -- that is, they play a fundamental role in what it is, internal to our constitution and that of the world, that enables inquiry in the first place -- and should be seen as part of Coleridge’s answer to what he identifies as the highest problem of philosophy in the 1816 Statesman’s Manual.
    [Show full text]
  • War: How Britain, Germany and the USA Used Jazz As Propaganda in World War II
    Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Studdert, Will (2014) Music Goes to War: How Britain, Germany and the USA used Jazz as Propaganda in World War II. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) thesis, University of Kent. DOI Link to record in KAR http://kar.kent.ac.uk/44008/ Document Version Publisher pdf Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html Music Goes to War How Britain, Germany and the USA used Jazz as Propaganda in World War II Will Studdert Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History University of Kent 2014 Word count (including footnotes): 96,707 255 pages Abstract The thesis will demonstrate that the various uses of jazz music as propaganda in World War II were determined by an evolving relationship between Axis and Allied policies and projects.
    [Show full text]
  • The Best of Latvia in 6 Days 21-27 May 2016
    The Best of Latvia in 6 days 21-27 May 2016 We offer you: Organized by: The Baltic Rotary Club of Riga A comprehensive - Celebrating 7 years... tour of Latvia Guided visits to Dear Rotarians, selected places of Towards the end of May interest and sight- 2016, from the 21st to 27th, seeing (English The Baltic Rotary Club of speaker guides) Riga will host Rotarians Reserved luxury and their guests to an buses exciting and thrilling tour Lunch and dinners of the best in Latvia, as part included of its 7th Anniversary celebrations. We will guide Best Kept Secret”! and join us in celebrating Club 6th Anniver- you through the one of best (www.huffingtonpost.com/2 sary Gala evening country to travel in 2016 - our 7th Anniversary in www.lonelyplanet.com/ 014/03/24/lativa- style, friendship and best-in-travel - and its travel_n_4981083.html). comfort. capital: Riga, UNESCO An almost untouched natu- World Heritage Site, ral ecosystem and unforget- Proceeds from the event chosen as the prettiest table historical destinations European city by USA will be donated towards Costs: TODAY. Discover Latvia are waiting you. Come and the many charitable EUR 690/ person with us and it won't be witness this beauties during projects, of The Baltic EUR 1280/ Cou- anymore for you "Europe the summer of 2016. Rotary Club of Riga, for ple orphans and pensioners. (accommodation excluded) Reservations In the following pages please limited to 50 persons only find the sightseeing and at- Book early to avoid disap- tractions that will be seen pointment during the Tour, plus the Minimum number of persons events , subject to discretion- for the event to be conducted al changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Economies of Russian Literature 1830-1850 by Jillian
    Money and Mad Ambition: Economies of Russian Literature 1830-1850 By Jillian Elizabeth Porter A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Harsha Ram, chair Professor Irina Paperno Professor Luba Golburt Professor Victoria Bonnell Spring 2011 Money and Mad Ambition: Economies of Russian Literature 1830-1850 © 2011 by Jillian Elizabeth Porter 1 Abstract Money and Mad Ambition: Economies of Russian Literature 1830-1850 by Jillian Elizabeth Porter Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures University of California, Berkeley Professor Harsha Ram, chair This dissertation offers a sustained examination of the economic paradigms that structure meaning and narrative in Russian literature of the 1830s-1840s, the formative years of nineteenth-century Russian prose. Exploring works by Alexander Pushkin, Nikolai Gogol, Fyodor Dostoevsky, and Faddei Bulgarin, I view tropes such as spending, counterfeiting, hoarding, and gambling, as well as plots of mad or blocked ambition, in relation to the cultural and economic history of Nicholas I’s reign and in the context of the importation of economic discourse and literary conventions from abroad. Furthermore, I consider the impact of culturally and economically conditioned affects—ambition, avarice, and embarrassment—on narrative tone. From the post-Revolutionary French plot of social ambition to
    [Show full text]
  • Levels of Discourse in Leibniz's Metaphysics the Ontological Status of Bodies
    Levels of Discourse in Leibniz's Metaphysics The Ontological Status of Bodies: A Study of the Levels of Discourse in Leibniz's Metaphysics By SCOTT STAPLEFORD, B.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts McMaster University C> Copyright by Scott Stapleford, August 1998 MASTER OF ARTS (1998) McMaster University (Philosophy) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: The Ontological Status of Bodies: A Study of the Levels of Discourse in Leibniz's Metaphysics AUTHOR: Scott Stapleford, B.A. (Brock University) SUPERVISOR: Professor Wilfrid Waluchow NUMBER OF PAGES: iv, 169 ii Table of Contents Introduction 1 The Problem 2 Collateral Issues 3 Procedure Part I 4 Some Working Deftnitions 5 Phenomenalism 5.1 Linguistic Phenomenalism 5.2 Berkeleian Phenomenalism 6 Leibniz and Phenomenalism 6.1 Macintosh's Interpretation 6.2 Jolley's Interpretation 6.3 Wilson's Interpretation 111 Part II 7 Recapitulation and Procedure 8 Athenian and Darwinian Approaches 8.1 Woolhouse's Interpretation 8.2 Adams' Interpretation 8.3 Hartz's Interpretation 8.4 Loeb's Interpretation 8.5 Rutherford's Interpretation 9 Psychology and Ontology 9.1 Mind and Matter in Descartes and Locke 9.2 Leibniz's Analysis of Mind and Matter 9.2.1 The Primary-Secondary Quality Distinction 9.2.2 Physical Considerations 9.2.3 Metaphysical Considerations 9.2.3.1 Substance as Unity 9.2.3.2 Substance as Activity 9.2.3.3 Substance as Subject 9.2.4 Psychological Considerations 10 Levels of Discourse 11 Leibniz's Epistemological Realism 11.1 Requirements of the System 11.2 The Contrary Proposition 11.
    [Show full text]