The New York Environmental Lawyer

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The New York Environmental Lawyer NYSBA SPRING 2009 | VOL. 29 | NO. 2 The New York Environmental Lawyer A publication of the Environmental Law Section of the New York State Bar Association Message from the Chair Greetings from Albany as we ✔ revamped the Section Journal, which will debut in approach summer! I hope that this 2009-10; message conveys the gratitude that ✔ instituted a “Track B” program for newer attor- I feel toward the many people in neys at the 2009 Fall Meeting; the Section who helped to achieve what can only be termed as an ex- ✔ created guidelines for written materials for tremely successful Section year. Section programs—which reduces paper and pro- motes sustainability; 2008-09 Section ✔ hosted renown physicist Dr. James Hansen to Accomplishments speak at Annual Meeting Climate Change pro- gram; If you will allow me to toot the Section’s horn for a moment, here Joan Leary Matthews ✔ co-sponsored the NYSBA Task Force on Global is a list of the many accomplish- Warming and provided signifi cant support for ments that together we achieved: the Task Force’s work in Albany; ✔ established a blog; ✔ engaged in signifi cant outreach for new members; ✔ established the Classroom Project; ✔ offered law students Section benefi ts, including free membership and registration at programs; ✔ began a Section webinar series; ✔ commented on key legislation—Bottle Bill and ✔ partnered with the International Section to SEQRA Standing; present additional webinars; (continued on p. 4) Inside From the Editor ...................................................................................... 2 Tribute to Dorothy Miner (Kevin Anthony Reilly) Dorothy Miner Defended Our Architectual Heritage ...............24 Historic Preservation (Philip Weinberg) Historic Preservation Law 101 for New York Lawyers ...............5 Dorothy Miner Award ................................................................... 25 (Christopher Rizzo) (Leonard Koerner) Two Recent Cases Highlight Concerns About the Dorothy Miner Obituary ............................................................... 26 New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission’s (David W. Dunlap) Management of the Designation Process .............................. 13 (Susan M. Stern) Clean and Green: Remediating Contaminated Sites More Sustainably ............................................................................ 27 Landmarks and Sustainability ......................................................17 (Walter Mugdan) (John Weiss) Recent Decisions in Environmental Law ..........................................33 Historic Preservation at a Crossroads: The 2009–2013 New York State Historic Preservation Plan........................... 20 (Amy E. Facca) From the Editor The present issue features draws our attention to those ideas and experiences, some Historic Preservation, an area uniquely American, but many of older vintage and with that too often seems marginal wider cultural resonances. When we sacrifi ce that which to environmental law and is un- we can see, feel and physically experience, we risk los- derappreciated as an important ing sight of the less tangible components of who we are component of public policy. I which, in the forward rush of everyday life, may become am suffi ciently old-school to be as spectral as yesterday’s myths. convinced of the centrality of the I would like to thank Chris Rizzo, of Carter Ledyard humanities, generally, and espe- & Millburn, who gathered the articles in this issue that cially history, to our cohesion as a address Historic Preservation. Chris authored an article society. Even if historical themes that provides a primer on Historic Preservation Law in and lessons remain relatively Kevin Anthony Reilly New York. The article starts with an overview of the rel- unarticulated in our modern me- evant federal law, then digs into an excellent exposition dia culture, I deeply believe it to be a fact that the web of of New York State preservation law and New York City’s historical associations provides the fi laments that hold us Landmarks Law. Chris’s article not only interweaves the together, providing an underlying strength and—if care- several statutory structures but also discusses illustra- fully examined—an orderly way of understanding and tive case law, before fi nally marching the reader forward explaining ourselves. into history with projections of where preservation ef- Certainly, history as a discipline incorporates more forts seem to be heading. As always in life, tax credits tensions that it did a half century ago. Scholars reach may prompt behavior where other efforts fail, and Chris for more subtle explanations of events and social issues, discusses the tax ramifi cations of some preservation en- people and groups are being analyzed who in the past deavors. fell beneath the proverbial radar screen of traditional nar- Susan Stern, an architect who is also a newly minted rative history, and the net of causation and explanations lawyer, focuses her article on the New York City Land- gathers information and data that generate new and even marks Law. Susan examines two recent cases that turned controversial ways of looking at people and events. If the on procedural considerations which, as employed by the fi eld of history is more contentious, though, it also is that Landmarks Preservation Commission, seemed to un- much richer. It follows that Historic Preservation, some- dermine the protection of New York City’s cultural and times defi ned as preservation of the built environment, historical resources. John Weiss, Deputy General Counsel should also take on newer and deeper meaning. Its im- of the Landmarks Preservation Commission, explains the portance lies not in cultural fetishes nor only as a means LPC permitting process, then addresses his article to the to enshrine staid exhibits, but as a means to bring into the sustainability aspects of preservation, notably where pres- immediacy of the present the ideas, sensations, thoughts ervation efforts intersect with energy conservation. Final- and dreams that animated prior generations, and which ly, Amy Facca, Preservation Planner at New York State’s welded together diverse peoples and cultures and built Offi ce of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation, a unique polity. History, and its motivating ideas and concludes by analyzing Historic Preservation at a Cross- experiences, can be better appreciated when its artifacts roads, the 2009-2013 New York State Historic Preservation and cultural reference points can be looked at, felt, and Plan. Amy’s discussion, and the underlying document, pondered. both broaden and deepen how we view preservation as However, just as historical studies sometimes get rel- an ideal, and she analyzes how preservation should be egated within academia to the ideological margins, and implemented operationally in a far more comprehensive within our culture historical persons and events survive manner. The article provides guidance as we grapple with too often as caricature, so, too, Historic Preservation is be- how to understand and preserve the past, in the future. ing drained of its richer possibilities. When the planning It is sad, but strangely coincidental, that my pre- for historical structures, monuments and locations is con- liminary discussions with Chris about this issue of this sidered, it seems that the choice comes down to Disneyfy- journal occurred in the wake of Dorothy Miner’s passing. ing our past or, alternatively, bulldozing it to make way Dorothy, from her perch in the New York City Landmarks for the glittering baubles proudly displayed by America’s Preservation Commission, and at Columbia University, truly impressive commercial dynamo. As Henry Adams was an early voice—some suggest she was a force of presciently observed a little more than a century ago, nature—for Historic Preservation, which she pursued that dynamo inevitably consumes our past and with it over the years with an ethos and a zeal that can best be our deeper sense of a national identity that, in its bet- described as an intellectual crusade, in the best sense. ter expression, is linked to formative ideas and experi- Her voice strengthened as the public’s appreciation for ences. Historic Preservation, then, also has value when it 2 NYSBA The New York Environmental Lawyer | Spring 2009 | Vol. 29 | No. 2 the monuments of its past ripened during the 1960s and The Peter A. Berle Environmental Integrity Award 1970s, and she provided backbone for preservation efforts was recently established by the Century Foundation in as political leaders championed real estate development New York City, in cooperation with the National Audu- in later decades. In recent years, Dorothy was affi liated bon Society, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the with Nick Robinson’s bailiwick in Pace University’s En- Environmental Defense Fund, our Environmental Law vironmental Law program. A memorial service was held Section, and friends of Peter Berle. Lou Alexander was recently at Columbia University which was well attended the Section’s representative on the Award Selection Com- by many people involved with preservation efforts, pro- mittee. Steve Kass, Peter Berle’s former partner, was cen- fessionally as well as locally, and several Section mem- trally involved in creating the award and in developing bers. The service was followed by a reception at the near- the selection process. The inaugural award was jointly by Cathedral of St. John the Divine. The New York Times presented on May 3 to the eminent climate scientist James wrote
Recommended publications
  • Historic Preservation Robinson Green Final 00 1/30/18 11:11 AM Page Ii Robinson Green Final 00 1/30/18 11:11 AM Page Iii
    robinson green final 00 1/30/18 11:11 AM Page i Historic Preservation robinson green final 00 1/30/18 11:11 AM Page ii robinson green final 00 1/30/18 11:11 AM Page iii Historic Preservation Law and Culture Cases and Materials Nicholas A. Robinson Gilbert and Sarah Kerlin Distinguished Professor of Environmental Law Emeritus Pace University, Elisabeth Haub School of Law Shelby D. Green Professor of Law Pace University, Elisabeth Haub School of Law Carolina Academic Press Durham, North Carolina robinson green final 00 1/30/18 11:11 AM Page iv Copyright © 2018 Nicholas A. Robinson Shelby D. Green All Rights Reserved ISBN 978-1-5310-0484-2 eISBN 978-1-53100-485-9 LCCN 2017957017 Carolina Academic Press, LLC 700 Kent Street Durham, North Carolina 27701 Telephone (919) 489-7486 Fax (919) 493-5668 www.cap-press.com Printed in the United States of America robinson green final 00 1/30/18 11:11 AM Page v We dedicate this casebook with gratitude in honor of Dorothy M. Miner. Nicholas A. Robinson and Shelby D. Green New York Preservation Archive Project robinson green final 00 1/30/18 11:11 AM Page vi robinson green final 00 1/30/18 11:11 AM Page vii Dedication Dorothy Marie Miner 1936 –2008 Dorothy Miner taught Historic Preservation Law at the Columbia University’s School of Architecture and at Pace University’s School of Law, for each of the fourteen years before her death. She curated many of the materials included in this casebook. For nineteen years before her academic life, she served as the first General Counsel to the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER No. 138 March 2009
    Professional Archaeologists of New York City, Inc. NEWSLETTER No. 138 March 2009 Table of Contents: 1 Meeting Minutes 2 Correspondences 5 Related Articles/Fun Stuff 10 Events 12 Membership Information 14 Next Meeting: March 11, 2009 Neighborhood Preservation Center 232 East 11th Street New York, NY 6:30pm Newsletter Editor: Christopher Ricciardi 4110 Quentin Road Brooklyn, New York 11234-4322 Phone/Fax: (718) 645-3962 Email: [email protected] PANYC GENERAL MEETING MINUTES November 19, 2008, 6:30 P.M. Neighborhood Preservation Center (NPC) 232 E.11th Street Notice of upcoming meeting, January 21, 2008, 6:30 pm Neighborhood Preservation Center, 232 E. 11th Street, NYC Present: Stone, Spritzer, Linn, MacLean, Schuldenrein, Rakos, Pickman, M. Smith, Wall 1) Treasurer’s Report: Nothing has changed since last report in September. 2) President’s Report: 1) Amanda Sutphin continues to look for repository funding. If anyone knows of a granting organization willing to support such a project, please contact her. 2) No response has been received from our letter to the Department of City Planning, but Stone will follow-up. 3) Final vote on developers parking garage project Riverside Houses, Brooklyn Heights Historic District was held November 18th. Landmarks approved project. Developer, for a second time, has misrepresented archaeology in his public comments by announcing he had “hired Geismar to monitor” archaeology. Stone will confirm that neither Geismar nor LPC recommended monitoring and will write another letter about this issue. 4) Still exploring “re-introduction” letter to Governor Paterson. Cantwell is unable to locate original PANYC award letter, but Geismar has photographs of actual award and Paterson receiving the award from Wall.
    [Show full text]
  • Interviews with the Former Chairs of Nyc's
    LEADING THE COMMISSION: INTERVIEWS WITH THE FORMER CHAIRS OF NYC'S LANDMARKS PRESERVATION COMMISSION The Reminiscences of Gene Norman © 2011 New York Preservation Archive Project PREFACE The following oral history is the result of a recorded interview with Gene Norman conducted by Interviewer Liz McEnaney in 2011. This interview is part of the Leading the Commission: Interviews with the Former Chairs of NYC's Landmarks Preservation Commission oral history project. The reader is asked to bear in mind that s/he is reading a verbatim transcript of the spoken word, rather than written prose. The views expressed in this oral history interview do not necessarily reflect the views of the New York Preservation Archive Project. Gene Norman began working in government while studying architecture. He came to the Landmarks Preservation Commission [LPC] from the Harlem Urban Development Corporation where he’d had dealings with the LPC while renovating landmarked, city-owned buildings. As chairman of the Commission, he worked to improve the day-to-day workings of the LPC, such as dealing with the backlog of Certificate of Appropriateness hearings. He shares his experiences working with Mayor Edward I. Koch’s administration and within the city government. During his tenure, he restructured the LPC, creating the survey department, and worked to make the Landmarks Commission’s dealings with the public transparent. He also established a way to clarify the significant features of landmarked buildings in designation reports, to later aid in hearings for renovations or alterations of the site. During his tenure, several important issues were arose, including St. Bartholomew’s Episcopal Church’s push to demolish the community house, the Flynn-Walsh Bill was proposed, and the Broadway Theaters began being designated.
    [Show full text]
  • Interviews with the Former Chairs of Nyc's
    LEADING THE COMMISSION: INTERVIEWS WITH THE FORMER CHAIRS OF NYC'S LANDMARKS PRESERVATION COMMISSION The Reminiscences of Laurie Beckelman © 2011 New York Preservation Archive Project PREFACE The following oral history is the result of a recorded interview with Laurie Beckelman conducted by Interviewer Liz McEnaney in 2011. This interview is part of the Leading the Commission: Interviews with the Former Chairs of NYC's Landmarks Preservation Commission oral history project. The reader is asked to bear in mind that s/he is reading a verbatim transcript of the spoken word, rather than written prose. The views expressed in this oral history interview do not necessarily reflect the views of the New York Preservation Archive Project. Laurie Beckelman first became involved in preservation while working for Kent Barwick at the Municipal Art Society. She continued her career of advocacy, as the executive director of New York Landmarks Conservancy before being appointed to chair the Landmarks Preservation Commission [LPC] in 1990. She speaks about the challenges facing the LPC at this time, such as maintaining itself as a separate agency. When setting her agenda as LPC chair, she emphasized designating Modernism, raising public awareness of preservation, and preserving areas and neighborhoods that had previously been overlooked, such as the Jackson Heights neighborhood in Queens. She also describes the change to working with the New York City Council, after the New York City Board of Estimate was dissolved, and the new issues it raised. She involved the LPC in several high profile cases, including Dvorak House, the African Burial Ground, and the Trans World Airlines Terminal.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Indicators of Success for Contentious Preservation
    Indicators of Success for Contentious Preservation Campaigns Ryan Walsh Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for a Master of Science in Historic Preservation Graduate School of Architecture, Planning, and Preservation Columbia University May 13, 2013 1 Thesis Advisor Kate Wood, Former Executive Director, LANDMARK WEST! Reader Anne Van Ingen, Chairman, Preservation League of New York State 2 ABSTRACT Title: Markers of Successful for Contentious Preservation Campaigns Advisor: Kate Wood Success of contentious campaigns advocating for the preservation of a threatened building is characterized by six indicators: (1) leadership, (2) conductivity, (3) numinosity, (4) publicity, (5) legal acuity, and (6) capital. This thesis identifies and defines the indicators through three case studies [Grand Central Terminal, City & Suburban Homes, and 2 Columbus Circle] and examines their future role in an evolving presimosphere. These six indicators can be used as a checklist, rubric, or quantitative estimator, thus offering campaign leaders additional information to aid in the development of their strategies and communication plans. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 5 THE POLITICS OF PRESERVATION ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Through the Legal Lens: Interviews with Lawyers Who Shaped NYC’S Landmarks Law
    THROUGH THE LEGAL LENS: INTERVIEWS WITH LAWYERS WHO SHAPED NYC’S LANDMARKS LAW The Reminiscences of Virginia Waters © 2016 New York Preservation Archive Project PREFACE The following oral history is the result of a recorded interview with Virginia Waters conducted by Interviewer Will Cook on December 11, 2015 and Liz H. Strong on July 11, 2016. This interview is part of the Through the Legal Lens: Interviews with Lawyers Who Shaped NYC’s Landmarks Law. The reader is asked to bear in mind that s/he is reading a verbatim transcript of the spoken word, rather than written prose. The views expressed in this oral history interview do not necessarily reflect the views of the New York Preservation Archive Project. Virginia Waters has had a lifelong interest in preservation. She began her professional career working for New York City, specifically in preservation law. As a young lawyer, she worked closely with Dorothy Miner, a prominent figure in the early days of preservation. Through her work with the Landmarks Preservation Commission, she helped to develop key strategies for Landmark Preservation Commission relating to demolition by neglect and the calendaring of buildings and districts. She explains the uniquely New York policy of Transferrable Development Rights (TDR) and it’s impact on preservation, particularly in Penn Central Transportation Co v. City of New York, as well as in the cases surrounding the Broadway Theaters landmarking process. Inspired by her love for historic preservation and landmarking, Virginia Waters shifted from a career in employment discrimination law to preservation law. Working alongside early preservation movement figures such as Dorothy Miner, Waters collaborated with the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission and the New York City Law Department to develop key strategies to counter demolition by neglect.
    [Show full text]
  • Enforcement and the New York City Landmarks Law: Past, Present, and Future
    ENFORCEMENT AND THE NEW YORK CITY LANDMARKS LAW: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE Benjamin Baccash Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree Master of Science in Historic Preservation Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation Columbia University May, 2010 ENFORCEMENT AND THE NEW YORK CITY LANDMARKS LAW: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE Benjamin Baccash Advisor: Anthony C. Wood This thesis hopes to improve the enforcement procedures of the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission (LPC) and further the protection of the historic resources under its regulation. Using the evolution of enforcement at the LPC for context, this thesis will examine how enforcement functions today. This examination will be complemented by a selection of case studies to further an understanding of the system. This thesis will then look to the enforcement methods of a selection of federal environmental laws and local preservation ordinances to inform recommendations to the historic preservation community which hope to improve enforcement of the New York City Landmarks Law. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the cooperation, help and generosity of the many people I corresponded with and interviewed over the seven months it took to research and write it. Anthony C. Wood, my advisor, provided me with invaluable guidance, introductions and criticisms. Without him, this thesis would not be nearly as coherent or comprehensive. Kate Wood of Landmark West! and John Weiss of the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission were members of my thesis jury and I thank them for taking the time to meet with me, respond to my many e-mails and read and critique my work product in addition to providing me with insider knowledge and information which without, this thesis would not have been as informed or worthwhile.
    [Show full text]
  • Interviews with the Former Chairs of Nyc's
    LEADING THE COMMISSION: INTERVIEWS WITH THE FORMER CHAIRS OF NYC'S LANDMARKS PRESERVATION COMMISSION The Reminiscences of Jennifer Raab © 2011 New York Preservation Archive Project PREFACE The following oral history is the result of a recorded interview with Jennifer Raab conducted by Interviewer Liz McEnaney in 2011. This interview is part of the Leading the Commission: Interviews with the Former Chairs of NYC's Landmarks Preservation Commission oral history project. The reader is asked to bear in mind that s/he is reading a verbatim transcript of the spoken word, rather than written prose. The views expressed in this oral history interview do not necessarily reflect the views of the New York Preservation Archive Project. Jennifer Raab was the Chairwoman of the Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) from 1994-2001 under Mayor Rudolph Guiliani. During her time on the LPC, she worked to streamline the appeal process and placed a high value in working with developers to preserve historic buildings. To that end, she advocated for a tax break for owners of landmarked buildings to encourage them to maintain them, and raised awareness of the financial benefits to landowners who own historic buildings. Some of her notable preservation accomplishments were landmarking Governor’s Island, the renovation of the Brooklyn Museum, and the addition to Hearst Tower. Jennifer Raab was chair of the Landmarks Preservation Commission from 1994 to 2001 under Mayor Rudy Giuliani. Arriving from spheres of public administration and private litigation, Raab entered the world of historic preservation as an outsider. Prior to the LPC, Raab worked as special projects manager for the South Bronx Development Organization, and as director of public affairs for the New York City Planning Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER No. 139 May 2009
    Professional Archaeologists of New York City, Inc. NEWSLETTER No. 139 May 2009 Table of Contents: 1 Meeting Minutes 2 Correspondences 5 2009-2010 PANYC Board 6 2009 Public Program 7 Related Articles/Fun Stuff 9 Events 12 Membership Information 13 Next Meeting: TBD Newsletter Editor: Christopher Ricciardi 4110 Quentin Road Brooklyn, New York 11234-4322 Phone/Fax: (718) 645-3962 Email: [email protected] PANYC GENERAL MEETING MINUTES January 21, 2009, 6:30 P.M. Neighborhood Preservation Center (NPC) 232 E.11th Street Notice of upcoming meeting, March 11, 2009, 6:30 pm Neighborhood Preservation Center, 232 E. 11th Street, NYC Present: Stone, Geismar, Pickman, Rothschild, Spritzer, Cantwell, and Wall Secretary’s report: Two corrections to the minutes of General Membership meeting. In #4, the word Aids should be Aides. In #5, it’s Therese Braddick not Terese. It was voted to accept the minutes Treasurer’s report: We have 46 members (1 complementary), and 3 subscribers (1 complementary). We have $3622.12 in the bank President’s report: a) Stone received letter from Therese Braddick saying that archaeological RFP’s will be tailored for specific projects in future. Geismar said she received two RFPs’ for which this was not the case. Geismar will send Stone information to use in preparing a letter to Braddick pointing this out. b) Re: Brooklyn Navy Yard, the MAS and others have proposed alternatives to save Admirals’ Row Houses, but the National Guard Bureau has not altered plans that we know of. PANYC has not yet been contacted for additional meetings, although this is expected.
    [Show full text]
  • Undoing Historic Districts
    A Report from the Society for the Architecture of the City UNDOING HISTORIC DISTRICTS JUNE, 2017 1 THE SOCIETY FOR THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE CITY Ronald J. Kopnicki, President, Matt McGhee, Treasurer, Christabel Gough, Secretary. The Society for the Architecture of the City is an all-volunteer historic preservation advocacy group, and can best be reached though the Secretary, at 45 Tudor City Place, #1815, New York NY 10017 or by email at [email protected]. We have been monitoring the Landmarks Preservation Commission since 1983, and were the publishers of Village Views, a journal commenting on historic preservation issues, 1984 – 2006. 2 CONTENTS AND SUMMARY Undoing Historic Districts is a discussion of the ideal of the historic district as originally imagined. Is the current administration of preservation law moving away from the original conception? I. Designation Report Antics in New York City………4 The recent Sullivan/Thompson Historic District Designation Report incorporates novel procedures and terminology leading to expedited demolition, while its adoption of a Statement of Regulatory Intent may violate the City Administrative Procedure Act. II. “What did the dog do in the night?”……………..20 The Sullivan/Thompson Historic District designation, long demanded by advocates, but dead in the water for a decade, appears to have been suddenly revived in tandem with an unrelated and governmentally expedited real estate deal. III. Keeping a Difficult Balance…………………….25 Conflicting property interests have been problematic from the first, but other administrations have avoided or limited certain damaging initiatives to weaken historic districts now enshrined in the Sullivan/Thompson designation report, such as vertical and horizontal expansion potential created by guaranteed demolition of adjacent smaller buildings, and abandonment of modern buildings regardless of quality through arbitrary cut-off dates—disincentives for harmonious additions to historic districts and adaptive re-use of historic buildings and sites.
    [Show full text]
  • COLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL Magazine Winter 2009
    COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK Columbia Law School 435 West 116th Street, Box A-2 Columbia Law School New York, NY 10027 Magazine LAW.COLUMBIA.EDU/MAGAZINE MILLER’S TIME Bankruptcy attorney Harvey Miller ’59 COURTING brings his immeasurable CONTROVERSY talents to Faculty experts talk to bear on the Adam Liptak about the challenges of Supreme Court’s use of foreign legal precedent an economic downturn PARTNERS IN CHANGE The Law School celebrates 100 years of the NAACP Winter 2009 60602_cvr.indd 2 4/15/09 3:36 PM Up NEXT: THE INTERNATIONAL LAW ISSUE Arriving this spring CHECK OUT OUR NEW WEBSITE law.columbia.edu/magazine ON THE WEB Exclusive photos, commenting, web-only content, and more WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU! Send us an email and tell us what you think at [email protected] 60602_cvr.indd 3 4/15/09 3:36 PM From thèDean On February 6, 2009, Dean David M. Schizer spoke at the 60th annual Winter Luncheon, where he honored both JEROME GREENE ’28, ’83 HON and STEVEN EPSTEIN ’68 with the Law School’s highest award: the Medal for Excellence. An edited version of those remarks appears below. “Since 1964, Columbia Law School’s most distinguished School. It’s a name familiar to every graduate and alumni have been recognized with the Medal for Excel- professor who has graced our halls over the past two lence. The medal is awarded to those whose professional decades: Jerome L. Greene. I regret never having gotten achievements reflect the qualities of character, intellect, to know Jerry personally, as our school, our university, and social and professional responsibility fostered by and our city suffered a profound loss on May 27, 1999, Columbia Law School .
    [Show full text]