DOCSLIB.ORG

Intermediate Egret at Midway Atoll

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

first north american , hoto, ra, hic record Intermediate Egret at Midway Atoll SCOTT RICHARDSON* n 25June 1997 Jim Nestler awoke inthe field camp at Eastern Island,Midway Atoll NationalWildlife Refuge. Before sunrise, he set out on his shearwatersurvey route, winding throughthick standsof Golden Crown-beaM (Ver&esinaencelioides) and Ironwood trees(Casuarina equisetifolia). Along the way lira noticedan egret, registeredits defaultidentity•atfle--and returnedto surveying shearwaters.Only in full daylightwould the egret'strue identity becomeapparent. Threehours later and a coupleof milesto thewest, on Midway's SandIsland, lames Aliberti and Bart McDermottwere working in similarsurroundings when they, too, encountered an egret.It wasn't a Cattle Egret.Their tentativeidentification: Intermediate Egret ( Mesophoyxintermedia). I learnedabout the sightingsin lateafternoon, after many others had seenthe rarity,and went with a smallgroup of volunteersur- veyorsto find it. Aftersome anxious searching, we spied an egretfor- agingamong patches of leafyVer&esina. I studied it from 50 m away, using8-power Bausch & LombElite binoculars under an unbroken bluesky, and began taking notes: 25 lun 97 @ 1620.Small to medium-sized,not far from Cattle, probably,with paleyellow bill moreslender than Cattle(but notSnowy shape). At doserange, all-white plumage (including wingstretch) has peach or pinkcast when compared with the nearbyLaysan Albatrosses. Legs dark. Characteristic/habitual wiggleof neckside to sidenear base. Foraging in sunlightat 50 m. Peckingat shrubs,especially, and ground.Feathering on upperleg sleek.Nowhere on plumageis thereany plume-like adornment.Lores do not appearto contrastwith bill. After observingthe egret,1 consultedfidd guidesat the refuge office.I comparedBirds of Australia (Pizzey and Doyle 1980), Birds of ]apan(Wild BirdSociety of Japan1982), and Birds of Hawaiiand the TropicalPacific (Pratt et al. 1987).The lattertwo guidesmentioned a darktip to the Intermediate'syellow bill. Fewother hints to identifi- cation-and no warnings--wereissued by thesebooks. North Americanfield guides, of course,did not coverthe species. Refugemanager Rob Shallenbergerwas eagerto obtain docu- mentaryphotos of theegret, so I ledhim to thespot. We foundJames Aliberti alreadyphotographing the bird. As two camerasclicked, I resumednote-taking: Backw/Rob @ 1710.Head scratchshows black feet, maybe slightlypaler than legs. Bill tip dark.Iris yellow bright. As dose as 15 m. It isan IntermediateEgret. IntermediateEgret 25 June1997 on SandIsland, Hidway Atoll. Note the bird'sslender build and the gape line whichends * 29 KnoxLane, Be•wick, NE 03901 belowthe eye. Photograph/JamesAliberti VOLUME53 (1999), ISSUE4 441 '- HAWAIIAN ARCHIPELAGO MIDWAY ATOLL ,•' - ' "• ...SPIT '" .,,.: :_ff. .?' The HawaiianIslands with a detail of MidwayAtoll. ELIMINATION OF OTHER SPECIES Tenother heron species are all white,either always or asjuveniles or morphs(Hancock and Kushlan1984). Only one,the CattleEgret (Bubulcusibis), is likelyto appearat Midway(Pratt et al. 1987).In basicplumage, it islargely white with a yellowto paleyellow bill, but hasdull yellowto greenishblack legs. At 48-55 cm,it issmaller than an IntermediateEgret (65-72 cm), and its profile---heavy-billedand short-necked--also differs from the graceful form of the Intermediate. An adult LaysanAlbatross provides a size reference for an IntermediateEgret at MidwayAtoll 25 June1997. The GreatEgret (Egretta alba, sometimes Great White Egret)is The albatrossmeasures about 80 cm (32 in) from headto tail. mostsimilar to the Intermediate;they are sometimes inseparable in A GreatEgret, by comparison,would measure 85-102 cm the field (Ali and Ripley1968, Hancock and Kushlan1984). Con- (33-40 in) and wouldappear as longas or longerthan fusion can arise when birds are seen at a distance and without com- the albatross.Photograph/James Aliberti parativescale. Female Greats of the modestarace are saidto be the smallest,but at closerange any Great Egret (85-102 cm) oughtto impressan observeras large. Another feature eliminating modesta is I left Midwaya few dayslater without encountering the egret its bone-coloredtibia. An exaggeratedkink in the neck,a character again.It remained,however, for more than a month. In fact, Jim considerednoteworthy in the Greatby Hancockand Kushlan (1984), Nestlersaw two IntermediateEgrets on 27 and29 July.The lastsight- wasnot apparent in theMidway egret. The brownish bill tip provedto ing,of one individual,was on 31 July1997. be an unimportantclue; juveniles of bothspecies share this feature. Perhapsit is more characteristicof the Intermediate,as the Greats DESCRIPTION illustratedin Hancockand Kushlan(1984) are shownwithout it. The followingnotes refer to thefirst egret encountered, although the The mark that bestdistinguishes M. intermediafrom E. alba, secondcould be describedidentically. however,is the gape extension. On alba,a darkgape line extends well Size and Shape.A gracefulheron, structurally similar to Great behindthe eye,while on intermediathe line endsbelow the eye Egretor SnowyEgret, but nearerin sizeto the latter. (Hancock and Kushlan1984). This featurewas not known at the time Plumage.All white.A peachcast was noticed during early obser- of observationand wasnot noticed in the field. Photos,however, fail vations,but it disappearedin laterviews. A yellowishwash appeared to showan extendedgape line. on thebreast when it wasilluminated by directsun and seen at close Two other speciesare alwayswhite, but both SnowyEgret (E. range--possiblydue to reflectionof sunlightfrom the surrounding thula)and Swinhoe'sEgret (E. eulophotes)have yellow feet and, fre- grass. quently,black bills. Four other herons have white morphs: Reddish SoftPart•. Yellow bill with darkbrownish tip. Yellow lores closely Egret(E. rufescens),Great Blue Heron (Ardeaherodias), Eastern Reef resembledbill color.Bright yellow iris. Blackishlegs, with slightly Heron (E. sacra),and LittleEgret (E. garzetta).All four areeliminat- palertoes. ed by size,bill color,or legcolor. A ninth species,Little Blue Heron Vocalizations. None heard. (E. caerulea),is white in its first year,but at that stagehas a pale Movement/Behavior.Tended to remainin a relativelysmall area. bluishbill. Finally,the MalagasyPond Heron (Ardeola idae), besides Whileforaging, frequently "neck swayed" in themanner described by being extremelyunlikely at Midway, is all white only at its Kushlan(1978): a rapidside-to-side motion of the neck(and some- Madagascarbreeding colonies. timesbody) with the head held relatively stationary. "Walking quick- ly" (Kushlan1978) perhaps best described as prancing. Fairly rapid DISCUSSION and verticalascent when flushed;wingbeat rate moderate.Jim The IntermediateEgret ranges from Africaacross southern Asia to Nestlerdescribed the flightto be "not as choppyand bouncyas a lapan,Indonesia, and Australia. Three subspecies are recognized by Cattle,but smoothlike a Snowyor Great;' Hancockand Kushlan(1984), but onlythe nominaterace has dark 44Z NORTH AHERICAN BIRDS INTERMEDIATE EGRET tibia.The breeding range of M. i. intermediaincludes southeast Asia AmericanOrnithologists' Union (AOU). 1998.Check-list of NorthAmerican andJapan (Hancock and Kushlan1984). Birds,7th ed.American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. Brooks,A. 1923.A commenton the allegedoccurrence of Mesophoyxinter- Bothpost-breeding disperal and annual migrations occur in M. i. media in North America. Condor25: 180-181. intermedia.Birds breeding in Japantypically fly southto winterin Campbell,R. W., N. K. Dawe,I. McTaggart-Cowan,J. M. Cooper,G. W. Kaiser, the Philippines;one banded individual was recovered 3520 km (2200 andM.. C. E.McNall. 1990. The Birds of BritishColumbia, vol. 1.University mi) from its breedingcolony (McClure 1974, cited in Hancockand of British Columbia Press,Vancouver. Hadden,E C. 1941.Midway Islands.The HawaiianPlanters' Record 45: Kushlan1984). Althoughthis recoverysuggests that Intermediate 179-221. Egretsare capable of long-distancemovements, such a migrational Hancock,J., and J. Kushlan.1984. TheHerons Handbook. Harper and Row, path includeslarge land massesfor stopovers.Both the 4400 km New York. (2800mi) from Japanto Midwayand the 6100km (3800mi) from Kermode,E 1923.Notes on the occurrenceof the PlumedEgret (Mesophoyx the southernPhilippines to Midway are mostlyopen oceanwith intermedia)in BritishColumbia. Murrelet4: 3-5. [An identicalarticle was publishedthe sameyear in CanadianField-Naturalist 37: 64-65.] occasionalsmall islets and atolls.Stopovers on theseisolated land- Kushlan,J. 1978.Wading birds. In ResearchReport Z NationalAudubon formswould have been possible--perhaps necessary--for the egrets Society,New York. to havereached Midway, unless they were aided in theirjourneys by McClure, E. 1974.Migration and Survivalof the Birdsof Asia. U.S. Army vesselstraversing the Pacific. MedicalComponent, SEATO, Bangkok. IntermediateEgrets usually are found along water margins, but Pizzey,G., and R. Doyle. 1980.A Field Guideto the Birdsof Australia. PrincetonUniversity Press, New Jersey. they also frequent grasslandswith water nearby (Hancock and Pratt,H. D., P.L. Bruner,and D. G. Berrett.1987. The Birds of Hawaii and the Kushlan1984). The Midwaybirds were seen on mowedgrass with TropicalPacific Princeton University Press, New Jersey. adjacentshrubs and trees (specifically, at the parade grounds, below Pyle, E 1984.Observations of migrant and vagrantbirds from Kure and the watertower, and nearthe hangar).They were not observedat
Recommended publications
  • The Birds of Gag Island, Western Papuan Islands, Indonesia

    The Birds of Gag Island, Western Papuan Islands, Indonesia

    DOI: 10.18195/issn.0312-3162.23(2).2006.115-132 [<ecords o{ the rVcstCrJJ Australian Museum 23: 115~ n2 (2006). The birds of Gag Island, Western Papuan islands, Indonesia R.E. Johnstone Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welsh pool DC Western Australia 6'1S6 Abstract This report is based mainly on data gathered during a biological survey of C;ag Island by a joint Western Australian Museum, Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense and Herbarium Bogoriense expedition in July 1'197. A total of 70 species of bird have been recorded for Gag Island and a number of these represent new island and/or Raja Ampat Archipelago records. Relative abundance, status, local distribution and habitat preferences found for each species arc described, extralimital range is outlined and notes on taxonomv are also given. No endemic birds were recorded for Gag Island but a number of species show significant morphological variation from other island forms and may prove to be distinct taxonomically. INTRODUCTION undergo geographic variation for taxonon,ic, Gag Island (0025'S, 129 U 53'E) is one of the Western morphological and genetic studies. The Papuan or Raja Ampat Islands, lying just off the annotated checklist provided covers every Vogelkop of Irian Jaya, between New Guinea and species recorded, both historically and during Halmahera, Indonesia. These islands include (from this survey. north to south) Sayang, Kawe, Waigeo, Gebe, Gag, In the annotated list I summarise for each species Gam, Batanta, Salawati, Kofiau, Misool and a its relative abundance (whether it is very common, number of small islands (Figure 1). Gag Island is common, moderately common, uncommon, scarce separated from its nearest neighbours Gebe Island or rare), whether it feeds alone or in groups, status to the north~west, and Batangpele Island to the (a judgement on whether it is a vagrant, visitor or north-east, by about 40 km of relatively deep sea.
  • Innovative Foraging by the House Sparrow Passer Domesticus

    Innovative Foraging by the House Sparrow Passer Domesticus

    46 AUSTRALIAN FIELD ORNITHOLOGY 2005, 22, 46--47 Innovative Foraging by the House Sparrow Passer domesticus NEIL SHELLEY 16 Birdrock Avenue, Mount Martha, Victoria 3934 (Email: [email protected]) Summary This note describes an incidental observation of House Sparrows Passer domesticus foraging for insects trapped within the engine bay of motor vehicles in south-eastern Australia. Introduction The House Sparrow Passer domesticus is commensal with man and its global range has increased significantly recently, closely following human settlement on most continents and many islands (Long 1981, Cramp 1994). It is native to Eurasia and northern Africa (Cramp 1994) and was introduced to Australia in the mid 19th century (Biakers et al. 1984, Schodde & Tidemann 1997, Pizzey & Knight 1999). It is now common in cities and towns throughout eastern Australia (Biakers et al. 1984, Schodde & Tidemann 1997, Pizzey & Knight 1999, Barrett et al. 2003), particularly in association with human habitation (Schodde & Tidemann 1997), but is decreasing nationally (Barrett et al. 2003). Observation On 13 January 2003 at c. 1745 h Eastern Summer Time, a small group of House Sparrows was observed foraging in the street outside a restaurant in Port Fairy, on the south-western coast of Victoria (38°23' S, 142°14' E). Several motor vehicles were angle-parked in the street, nose to the kerb, adjacent to the restaurant. The restaurant had a few tables and chairs on the footpath for outside dining. The Sparrows appeared to be foraging only for food scraps, when one of them entered the front of a parked vehicle and emerged shortly after with an insect, which it then consumed.
  • Criteria 3 Annexure 3.5.1 Department of Collegiate and Technical Education Sri Mahadeshwara Government First Grade College Kollegal

    Criteria 3 Annexure 3.5.1 Department of Collegiate and Technical Education Sri Mahadeshwara Government First Grade College Kollegal

    Criteria 3 Annexure 3.5.1 Department of Collegiate and Technical Education Sri Mahadeshwara Government First Grade College Kollegal Collaborative Field work with Department of Zoology University of Mysore on survey of aquatic birds has been conducted during the year February 2016 -18 to give Awareness about the. 1. Methods used for survey of birds, 2. Equipment to carry while going for survey. 3. Habit and habitat of birds. 4. Develop the skill of using DSLR camera. Name of the collaborating agency with Name of the participants contact details Dr Sathish S V and Basavarajappa S, Professor of Zoology, students of B Sc. VI Semester University of Mysore. Manasagangothri, 1. Anil kumar B, Mysore. Mob.9449203241 2. Parashivamurthy, 3. Nithin B, 4. Roshan M R. Results obtained: Sl.No Birds observed Order Total mean Relative abundance 1 Common shelduck Anseriformes 0.16 0.02% 2 Cotton pygmy goose Anseriformes 1.77 0.31% 3 Ferruginous duck Anseriformes 1.33 0.23% 4 Garganey Anseriformes 2.5 0.44% 5 Greylag goose Anseriformes 1.27 0.22% 6 Lesser whistling duck Anseriformes 21.61 3.88% 7 Spot billed duck Anseriformes 36.77 6.60% 8 White winged duck Anseriformes 0.83 0.14% 9 Black tailed godwit Charadriiformes 140.72 25.27% 10 Black winged stilt Charadriiformes 35.55 6.38% 11 Bronze winged jacana Charadriiformes 5.61 1.00% 12 Common redshank Charadriiformes 3.11 0.55% 13 Golden plover Charadriiformes 1.38 0.24% 14 Green sandpiper Charadriiformes 9.16 1.64% 15 Marsh Sand piper Charadriiformes 15.72 2.82% 16 Red wattle lapwing Charadriiformes 11.33
  • Courtship and Pair Formation in the Great Egret

    Courtship and Pair Formation in the Great Egret

    COURTSHIP AND PAIR FORMATION IN THE GREAT EGRET Joca• H. Wt•s• THv. reproductivebehavior of the Ardeidaehas receivedconsiderable attention (Verwey 1930; Meanley 1955; Cottrille and Cottrille 1958; Meyerriecks1960 and in Palmer 1962; Baerendsand Van Der Cingel 1962; Blaker 1969a, 1969b; Lancaster 1970). Although Meyerriecks (in Palmer 1962) summarizedthe behavior and McCrimmon (1974) described two sexual displays in detail, the reproductive behavior of the Great Egret (Casmerodiusalbus egretta) remainsessentially unknown. This paper describescourtship and pair formationin this little studied species. STLTD¾AREAS AND METIIODS Most of the observations were made at Avery Island, Iberia Parish, Louisiana, 91ø 30' W, 29ø 30• N. Great Egrets nested on five bamboo platforms (ranging from 4 by 20 m to 7 by 35 m, approximate]y) 2 m above the water surface in "Bird City," a 5-ha freshwater pond in the center of the island. Short lengths of bamboo twigs were provided for nest material. The five bamboo platforms supported 430 •-• 15 nesting pairs of Great Egrets in 1974. This number represented a drastic decline from previous years (E. M. Simmons, pets. comm.) and coincidedwith the establishmentof a second heronry 1 km southeast of Bird City. Additional observationswere made at Headquarter Pond, St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge, and Smith Island, Wakulla County, Florida, 84ø 10' W, and 84ø 19• W, 30ø 05' N, and 30ø 03' N, respectively. At Headquarter Pond Great Egrets nested in willows growing in open water more than 0.6 m in depth. The number of nesting egretsdecreased from 38 pairs in 1971 to 9 pairs in 1972 (see below).
  • ISPL-Insight-Aussie-Backyard-Bird-Count

    ISPL-Insight-Aussie-Backyard-Bird-Count

    Integrate Sustainability 18 October 2019 Environment Unique Birds of Australia: The Aussie Backyard Bird Count Samantha Mickan – Environmental Specialist It’s that time of year again, time for the Aussie Backyard Bird Count (Backyard Bird Count). Now in its 6th year, the Aussie Backyard Bird Count is occurring between 21st till the 27th of October and is facilitated by Birdlife Australia. Over the course the week participants are encouraged to observe birds around them for 20 minutes using the Aussie Backyard Bird Count app. What is cool is you don’t have to stay in your backyard, you can visit your local pack, nature reserve or head to the beach. Who can’t find 20 minutes, to stop and observe bird occurring in your local area? Who is BirdLife Australia? Birdlife Australia is the largest, independent, non-profit bird conservation organisation in Australia. They run the Backyard Bird Count each year to obtain valuable data on bird communities throughout Australia. The trends extrapolated from this data can be used to get a glimpse into the changes bird populations are undergoing, and subsequently the environment, as Australia’s Unique changes in populations are a reflection of changes in the environment. The count is Birds held in October each year to capture migratory birds which are returning to Australia from the northern hemisphere for nesting, breeding and flocking. Many of these migratory birds are water birds that flock to our coasts where most human populations are situated, making it an ideal time of year for counts. Backyard Bird Count Results 2018 In 2018, 76,918 people in Australia counted 2,751,113 birds over the 7-days period.
  • Effects of Nest Characteristics and Black Rat Rattus Rattus Predation on Daily Survival Rates of Great Egret Ardea Alba Nest

    Effects of Nest Characteristics and Black Rat Rattus Rattus Predation on Daily Survival Rates of Great Egret Ardea Alba Nest

    Effects of nest characteristics and black rat Rattus rattus predation on daily survival rates of great egret Ardea alba nests in mangrove forest in the Hara Biosphere Reserve, the Persian Gulf Authors: Elnaz Neinavaz, Ahmad Barati, Jessi L. Brown, Farzaneh Etezadifar, and Besat Emami Source: Wildlife Biology, 19(3) : 240-247 Published By: Nordic Board for Wildlife Research URL: https://doi.org/10.2981/12-087 BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Complete website, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/terms-of-use. Usage of BioOne Complete content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/Wildlife-Biology on 04 Apr 2019 Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-use Wildl. Biol. 19: 240-247 (2013) Original article DOI: 10.2981/12-087 Ó Wildlife Biology, NKV www.wildlifebiology.com Effects of nest characteristics and black rat Rattus rattus predation on daily survival rates of great egret Ardea alba nests in mangrove forest in the Hara Biosphere Reserve, the Persian Gulf Elnaz Neinavaz, Ahmad Barati, Jessi L.
  • Great Egret Ardea Alba

    Great Egret Ardea Alba

    Great Egret Ardea alba Joe Kosack/PGC Photo CURRENT STATUS: In Pennsylvania, the great egret is listed state endangered and protected under the Game and Wildlife Code. Nationally, they are not listed as an endangered/threatened species. All migra- tory birds are protected under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918. POPULATION TREND: The Pennsylvania Game Commission counts active great egret (Ardea alba) nests in every known colony in the state every year to track changes in population size. Since 2009, only two nesting locations have been active in Pennsylvania: Kiwanis Lake, York County (fewer than 10 pairs) and the Susquehanna River’s Wade Island, Dauphin County (fewer than 200 pairs). Both sites are Penn- sylvania Audubon Important Bird Areas. Great egrets abandoned other colonies along the lower Susque- hanna River in Lancaster County in 1988 and along the Delaware River in Philadelphia County in 1991. Wade Island has been surveyed annually since 1985. The egret population there has slowly increased since 1985, with a high count of 197 nests in 2009. The 10-year average count from 2005 to 2014 was 159 nests. First listed as a state threatened species in 1990, the great egret was downgraded to endan- gered in 1999. IDENTIFYING CHARACTERISTICS: Great egrets are almost the size of a great blue heron (Ardea herodias), but white rather than gray-blue. From bill to tail tip, adults are about 40 inches long. The wingspan is 55 inches. The plumage is white, bill yellowish, and legs and feet black. Commonly confused species include cattle egret (Bubulus ibis), snowy egret (Egretta thula), and juvenile little blue herons (Egretta caerulea); however these species are smaller and do not nest regularly in the state.
  • Draft National Recovery Plan for the Australian Fairy Tern Sternula Nereis Nereis

    Draft National Recovery Plan for the Australian Fairy Tern Sternula Nereis Nereis

    Draft National Recovery Plan for the Australian Fairy Tern Sternula nereis nereis The Species Profile and Threats Database pages linked to this recovery plan is obtainable from: http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/sprat.pl Image credit: Adult Australian Fairy Tern (Sternula nereis nereis) over Rottnest Island, Western Australia © Georgina Steytler © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia, 2019. The National Recovery Plan for the Australian Fairy Tern (Sternula nereis nereis) is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. This report should be attributed as ‘National Recovery Plan for the Australian Fairy Tern (Sternula nereis nereis), Commonwealth of Australia 2019’. The Commonwealth of Australia has made all reasonable efforts to identify content supplied by third parties using the following format ‘© Copyright, [name of third party] ’. Disclaimer While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the
  • LOCAL ACTION PLAN for the COORONG FAIRY TERN Sternula

    LOCAL ACTION PLAN for the COORONG FAIRY TERN Sternula

    LOCAL ACTION PLAN FOR THE COORONG FAIRY TERN Sternula nereis SOUTH AUSTRALIA David Baker-Gabb and Clare Manning Cover Page: Adult Fairy Tern, Coorong National Park. P. Gower 2011 © Local Action Plan for the Coorong Fairy Tern Sternula nereis South Australia David Baker-Gabb1 and Clare Manning2 1 Elanus Pty Ltd, PO BOX 131, St. Andrews VICTORIA 3761, Australia 2 Department of Environment and Natural Resources, PO BOC 314, Goolwa, SOUTH AUSTRALIA 5214, Australia Final Local Action Plan for the Department of Environment and Natural Resources Recommended Citation: Baker-Gabb, D., and Manning, C., (2011) Local Action Plan the Coorong fairy tern Sternula nereis, South Australia. Final Plan for the Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Acknowledgements The authors express thanks to the people who shared their ideas and gave their time and comments. We are particularly grateful to Associate Professor David Paton of the University of Adelaide and to the following staff from the Department of Environment and Natural Resources; Daniel Rogers, Peter Copley, Erin Sautter, Kerri-Ann Bartley, Arkellah Hall, Ben Taylor, Glynn Ricketts and Hafiz Stewart for the care with which they reviewed the original draft. Through the assistance of Lachlan Sutherland, we thank members of the Ngarrindjeri Nation who shared ideas, experiences and observations. Community volunteer wardens have contributed significant time and support in the monitoring of the Coorong fairy tern and the data collected has informed the development of the Plan. The authors gratefully appreciate that your time volunteering must be valued but one can never put a value on that time. Executive Summary The Local Action Plan for the Coorong fairy tern (the Plan) has been written in a way that, with a minimum of revision, may inform a National and State fairy tern Recovery Plan.
  • Guidance for Time of Year Restrictions on Colonial Water Birds and Wading Birds

    Guidance for Time of Year Restrictions on Colonial Water Birds and Wading Birds

    Guidance for time of year restrictions on colonial water birds and wading birds Abatement Plan Because time of year restrictions likely cannot be avoided and the project area is within areas known to be occupied by nesting shorebirds, we recommend that a bird abatement plan be developed in coordination with the Service and the LDWF. The abatement plan should include a monitoring plan including pre-construction and construction monitoring, anticipated abatement procedures, a report outline of daily monitoring and abatement activities, and include a post- construction report. Brown pelican (For use when only pelicans are present; for all nesting shorebird species, see “Colonial Nesting Waterbirds” further below in this document) The proposed project may affect nesting habitat for the brown pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis), which was officially removed from the List of Endangered and Threatened Species on December 17, 2009. Brown pelicans nest in Louisiana from April 1 through September 15. Nesting periods vary considerably among Louisiana’s brown pelican colonies, so it is possible that this breeding window could be altered based upon the dynamics of the individual colony. The Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries’ Coastal and Nongame Resources Division (225/765-2811) should be contacted to obtain the most current information about the nesting chronology of individual brown pelican colonies. Brown pelicans are known to nest on barrier islands and other coastal islands in St. Bernard, Plaquemines, Jefferson, Lafourche, and Terrebonne Parishes. Current nesting locations include Raccoon Point on Isles Dernieres, Queen Bess Island, Plover Island (Baptiste Collette), Wine Island, Rabbit Island in Calcasieu Lake (Cameron Parish), and islands in the Chandeleur chain.
  • Summary on the Importance of Sumatra's East Coast For

    Summary on the Importance of Sumatra's East Coast For

    MAP 1 SURVEY AREAS ON THE IMPORTANCE OF SUMATRA'S EAST COAST FOR WATERBIRDS, 104° E with notes on the Asian Dowitcher Limnodromus semipa1matus. c; l e N By Marcel J. Silvius .,IJ\)0 ~ (First draft received 29 October 1987) ••• "'CJ SUMMARY G·"' % ~ Since 1984, three surveys were conducted along the east coast of Sumatra. Several coastal wetlands appeared to be of international importance for waterbirds (according to the criteria of the Ramsar Convention). More than 10,000 large waterbirds were identified, including large numbers { of Milky Storks Mycteria cinerea and Lesser Adjutants Tanjung Datuk Leptopti1os javanicus,, and over 100,000 migratory waders (28 species) were counted. The observation of a minimum total of 3,800 Asian Dowitchers Limnodromus semipa1matus indicates that the east coast of Sumatra is the main wintering area of the species. In areas of high 0 { conservation importance, data were collected on habitat and threats. Several of these areas face heavy reclamation pressure, which necessitates urgent conservation action. INTRODUCTION Prior to 1983 the coastal wetlands of eastern Sumatra had 10 received little ornithological attention, as is the case with most of Indonesia's coastal wetlands. Their importance to migrant and resident waterbirds remained undetermined as is illustrated by the most recent large­ JAMB I scale marine areas inventory (Salm and Halim, 1984), which lists no waterbird sites of importance on the east coast of Sumatra. Reserve It is only since 1983 that detailed information on the distribution of coastal waterbirds has become available. In that year large numbers of waders were recorded on the mudflats of the Berbak Game Reserve (Silvius, et.a7.
  • REVIEWS Edited by J

    REVIEWS Edited by J

    REVIEWS Edited by J. M. Penhallurick BOOKS A Field Guide to the Seabirds of Britain and the World by is consistent in the text (pp 264 - 5) but uses Fleshy-footed Gerald Tuck and Hermann Heinzel, 1978. London: Collins. (a bette~name) in the map (p. 270). Pp xxviii + 292, b. & w. ills.?. 56-, col. pll2 +48, maps 314. 130 x 200 mm. B.25. Parslow does not use scientific names and his English A Field Guide to the Seabirds of Australia and the World by names follow the British custom of dropping the locally Gerald Tuck and Hermann Heinzel, 1980. London: Collins. superfluous adjectives, Thus his names are Leach's Storm- Pp xxviii + 276, b. & w. ills c. 56, col. pll2 + 48, maps 300. Petrel, with a hyphen, and Storm Petrel, without a hyphen; 130 x 200 mm. $A 19.95. and then the Fulmar, the Gannet, the Cormorant, the Shag, A Guide to Seabirds on the Ocean Routes by Gerald Tuck, the Kittiwake and the Puffin. On page 44 we find also 1980. London: Collins. Pp 144, b. & w. ills 58, maps 2. Storm Petrel but elsewhere Hydrobates pelagicus is called 130 x 200 mm. Approx. fi.50. the British Storm-Petrel. A fourth variation in names occurs on page xxv for Comparison of the first two of these books reveals a ridi- seabirds on the danger list of the Red Data Book, where culous discrepancy in price, which is about the only impor- Macgillivray's Petrel is a Pterodroma but on page 44 it is tant difference between them.